I have figured out a formula in order to calculate the area under the graph for these lines. I will explain it for the blue line, but this will work for the orange line as well. Step 1: Take the sum of the column '% of population'. Step 2: Multiply this number with 10. Step 3: Subtract 500 of this value. And now you have the same answer as in the example. With this method, you kind of integrate the area under the curve!
@dustiinde42162 жыл бұрын
could you please show this way of solution in a process in numbers? I just cant get it. thank you!
@mansinigam7888 Жыл бұрын
A Million Thanks to u Brother ...💯 I was literally wandering for the Concept Clarity 😭... [ Respect from India 🇮🇳 🙏]
@wrjazziel2 жыл бұрын
Thank youuuu so much!,... I needed this
@chutiyamimuhammad47346 жыл бұрын
Very easy and concise explanation. I really like it.
@joanafreire31884 жыл бұрын
So clear... thank you!
@pawanbhoir57385 жыл бұрын
Excellent and perfectly explain
@joaquinarribas87022 жыл бұрын
Sorry but, I have a question on how this method applies to my data. I am compiling information on income distribution of 30 countries and they don't offer me the possibility to form triangles in any spot. For example, here is the data for Burundi: (0;0), (10;0.3), (20;1.9), (30;5.2), (40; 9.2); (50; 4.7), (60; 20.2), (70; 27.7), (80; 37.3), (90; 53), (100;100). I don't have any point where there are straight lines so I can form traingles. How could I calculate the area of the lorenz curve in this situation? Thank you very much.
@hdllz5 жыл бұрын
OMG 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 thank you thank you thank you !!! this id sooo helpful !! God bless you
@coolramama96 жыл бұрын
Excellent Video.. Thank you.. and expecting some more videos
@abinashekka63143 жыл бұрын
great explanation .....so cleared .... thank u very much
@emiliapietrynek71612 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Great explanation !!
@ismaelt.25064 жыл бұрын
May Allah bless your mother
@tshepisoletsoalo5055 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for the video, it helped a lot
@han05n6 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This is so helpful.
@mannemendel86936 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation. I'm curious... Isn't A+B always 5000? Why then do we have do divide A with this static number, instead of just using A as our figure for comparison? (My guess is that while not necessary for comparisons it's more convenient and pedagogical to have a number between 0 and 1 instead of one between 0 and 5000 ?)
@erickkadoh7779 ай бұрын
That's also my question because 5,000+3,150=8150...gini index =22.69%
@123voorhees6 жыл бұрын
It seems silly to calculate the area of all the shapes under the Lorentz curve. Wouldn't it make more sense to do do power regression or exponential regression of the observed data and then integrate the function to find the area under the curve?
@liammalloy6 жыл бұрын
It might, if you have a function for the Lorenz Curve. But in the real world you will likely have data broken up by deciles or quintiles in which case calculating the area of triangles is going to be your best bet.
@123voorhees6 жыл бұрын
that makes sence. However, if the observations of the income of the population wasn't set in jumps from 10 to 20%, but rather 1 to 2%, then we would have a 100 observations, but most likely also a smoother curve, which would make it very tedious to calculate the triangles between every observation.
@liammalloy6 жыл бұрын
That's true. And, of course, for modeling purposes, you would want to have a smooth function that you could easily integrate. One of the interesting things that people who study this have discovered is that the income distribution for most people most closely resembles a log-Normal distribution while the income distribution at the very top is best modeled with a Pareto power distribution (as is wealth). Some physicists who have turned their attention to the question have viewed this as a natural law, but it seems more likely to be the result of human-made institutions.
@shynnaganeo2 жыл бұрын
why you start to 40 and not to 60 in gini coefficient
@delama16334 жыл бұрын
Thanks you, amazing!
@shynnaganeo2 жыл бұрын
can i ask? y u start to 40 and not to 60?
@theknowledgeofperfaction60742 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir,,❤
@ramakumaridubeycrn45242 жыл бұрын
Perfect
@Sugam-Academy6 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation...Thank u sir for clearing my doubts .
@miguelzuniga40282 жыл бұрын
I love u
@rachittyagiyoutube5 жыл бұрын
Sir any other way to find gini coefficient?
@liammalloy5 жыл бұрын
No, you need the Lorenz Curve to calculate the Gini coefficient. If you have equations describing (or estimating) the Lorenz Curve you can use calculus, but that isn't how real data works.
@rachittyagiyoutube5 жыл бұрын
@@liammalloy sir i was saying by using percentage data? Actually That are in the boxes, sir i am thinking that this method is bit difficult 😅😅 and . Ya I don't have equations.
@liammalloy5 жыл бұрын
@@rachittyagiyoutube You can use any data you have. Percentages, dollars, etc. You just need to make sure you use consistent units.
@rachittyagiyoutube5 жыл бұрын
@@liammalloy ok sir
@rohannaik62756 жыл бұрын
why didn't he just do it using trapeziums
@srkami9608 Жыл бұрын
Hekoed a kitm thanks!
@Potencyfunction Жыл бұрын
Sir we are not finace economs to make gini coefficients and the correlation between working places and amount of unemployment. We are just idiots in Parlament .
@amara12345543217 жыл бұрын
What did you use to make the graph
@liammalloy7 жыл бұрын
Ameerah, I just used excel. The key is that the values have to be the cumulative amount of income or wealth for the bottom 10%, 20%, 30%, etc.