2016 Ford Expedition Start Up and Review 3.5 L Turbo V6 Ecoboost

[@patalexander1965]

Nothing outdated here! It at true SUV ( truck) that stands alone. Big, bold and savvy! Much safety, much power, beautiful ride and has it all for the individual or the family!

[@ravenjames3873]

it's outdated just like you. most people drive pickup trucks now a days, and a crossover as the main family vehicle. it's not about being big and bold, and there not as safe as you think they are. id rather have the Chevy Traverse or Nissan pathfinder, your much better protected than you think you are. but no matter how protected you think you are you can still die in any vehicle, you just have to drive responsibly when your out on the road.

[@FordEscape12345678]

This jeep is definitely not outdated. It's updated, and it looks nice and new.

[@ksoriano9766]

Its amazing how much it looks the same as my 2008 expedition limited, it needs a refresh desperately

[@alessiabenedetto5278]

I also love the fact the expedition el has lots of room and comfortable seats.

[@alessiabenedetto5278]

I just traded my 2010 toyota camry for a used 2015 ford expedition el and I love it. I was very suprised with the excelleration. I gotta tell yah for a 6,000 pound truck, it can move. Awesome video!

[@Crazyevil_disturbing]

well i love big suvs they offer better protection against crashes

[@seanc6468]

2016 expedition xlt el. Well equipped with black interior and si!ver exterior. 3 Big teenagers and two dogs. Utilitarian is alright with me.

[@destruct919]

the body didn't change at all! old school! advice make the Ford Everest a big SUV! for future ford expedition....

[@vegacamilo18]

parking is not bad I drive a 2009 ford expedition el and I have no problem

[@temekamcgee]

we so need this car been sticking with 2013's need an upgrade 😀

[@stevenhooten4275]

I had a 2001 f150 2x4 with the 5.4l crew cab short bed and I got over 20 mpg highway on that truck the 5.4l on the expedition should get close to the mpg this gets I know it's not way lower I have a 2019 f250 6.2l crew cab long bed 4x4 and I get 14 to 16 mpg average and I get over 17 mpg highway

[@cadencaden8690]

Chevy will always win

[@ega0117]

What engine generation is the eco boost 3.5 engine??? 1 or 2

[@Kernalpanik]

This SUV desperately needs a make over... Outside needs slicks design front and rear lights it needs a new slick body design as as society moves on we have this demand for futuristic and modern looking vehicles and with that thought I would expect for to gain there demand for the expedition if they went all digital like every other automotive company is doing now and days along with slick design on the interior as a posed to all that bulky stuff they have on the interior... IMO a similar model to compare it to would be the Lincoln MKX

[@TheBasher-_-]

The gas mileage is the same always even though it has a 3.5L. My old 2002 expedition did 15.7 city and 21 going on the interstate at 65-70

[@spuddapotato2494]

I agree that the exterior styling is really dated - looks the same as they did in the early 2000s. Interior wise - it looks pretty well refreshed. You don't have any of that dark grey interior colors that ford was so infatuated with in the1990s and 2000s and the head unit and gauge cluster looks pretty modern.

[@spydoorman7583]

That petrol v6 sounds like a diesel!

[@seanc6468]

I have a 03. My wife just got a 16. Two different worlds...

[@ricovlogschannel4302]

Cameron do you drive a Ford Expedition?

[@hankm.4471]

Debating on this or the Lincoln Navigator which is better?

[@chrisb1040]

Navigator no doubt. More expensive. But more design. More modern. Better fuel economy and towing. Better for your money's worth when you get 80,000$ worth of stuff in a 70,000$ navigator. Instead of 40,000$ worth of stuff on a 60,000$ expedition.

[@mrperfecto2758]

Ford please make the excursion again with the new 6.7 diesel, with need those kind of suv

[@matthewyim1736]

But the Excursion has been discontinued, so why would you say you want the Excursion to come back?

[@mrperfecto2758]

Matthew's Car Corner The Excursión with the 7.3 diesel Engine was one of best SUV if not the best SUV of all the time, space,durability,best mpg ,streng etc etc,

[@jasonkhan9616]

Hey how's it going? Its really funny macho imagine What's your opinion about it

[@harinramos4886]

esta excelente la nueva (2016)Ford expedition

[@SnapcrackerzTeam]

they should have made them duel exhaust let that motor breath

[@tee228]

everything looks good except the dip in the headlights. looks like its about to cry

[@FelNoobs]

is it same size with tahoe or suburban

[@TheKillerace900]

bigger

[@602liljr]

it's a bit bigger than the Tahoe but not the suburban

[@alexvideo33]

What is better an Еxpedition or Tahoe?

[@keino111689]

+Алексей Федин Infiniti QX80 or the new Armada

[@alexvideo33]

KEINOMADDONE I Hate Nissans

[@zacharycrocker7001]

Expedition, best in class towing, and just as great everywhere else.

[@keino111689]

Zachary Crocker i must disagree. when it comes to luxury, refinement, and fit and finish its a joke. that thing is so far behind the competition. everything inside is utilitarian, no refinement and look at it, the least aesthetically pleasing.....i mean that thing is a dinosaur.

[@zacharycrocker7001]

KEINOMADDONE Pulls like a dinosaur too. I would not call it utilitarian, I would call it pratical and easy to clean in everyday life which includes kids, school, sports, and so on. And it's plenty luxurious, just as many features, just rapped in a easy to clean family proof design. My dashboard gets really dirty, the plastic is a lot easier to clean and take care of, just wipes off, no leather treatment, doesn't stain. The QX80 has so many leathery, shiney, chrome surfaces inside that would look like shit dirty and are too hard to deal with. The bottom line is that he asked the difference between a Tahoe and expedition not Infiniti. Expedition is better.

[@TheKillerace900]

lincon navigator too??

[@onerebelbuddha]

He down plays the SUV the entire video

[@No_timezone77]

I actually find my Ford touch very easy to use

[@ravenjames3873]

my ford touch sucked balls, and it wasn't easy to use.

[@Crazyevil_disturbing]

and they r more confortable than a crossover

[@yahyaeraltay1574]

Where is the aux input i cant see ?

[@urielhernandezT150]

No aux input

[@noobeenaut]

Its in the center console

[@fazlkarimkhan5244]

Score For Expedition?

[@CameronsCarReviews]

+Fazlkarim Khan 4.5/5

[@hermit527]

+Camerons Car Reviews That's an awfully high score considering that you pointed out that the truck was dated.

[@CameronsCarReviews]

+Hermit527 Yes it's a 4.5 rating, but the Expedition is still one of the best in the Full Size SUV class because mainly of it's 3.5 L Twin Turbo V6 and it's independent rear suspension. It's still a great full size SUV mainly because of the fundamentals, but it's styling on the inside and out is just dated.

[@tallll70]

+Camerons Car Reviews Suspension definitely, but engine, no way...... I can't find one explanation why. Little more HP can't possibly make up for all points against, not to mention turbos will get you that HP only in less rpm range vs simple bigger displacement. You have overworking more expansive engine which can't possibly last same as v8 and more moving parts (each turbo costs 800 bucks), while you get same or worse fuel economy when towing. They say that you getting v6 millage, what a playing with words, every v6 fleet truck i used had worse mpg then v8s. I liked a lot our v6 fleet Ford truck and Fords in general, i just believe strongly that they screwed up with this engine. Turbocharged diesels are in different category, but they do make much more sense.

[@jedknutson8373]

dated interior you say, but yet a 4.5 star rating. can't take your reviews serious if you have flaws like that.

[@CameronsCarReviews]

+Jed Knutson Yes it's a 4.5 rating, but the Expedition is still one of the best in the Full Size SUV class because mainly of it's 3.5 L Twin Turbo V6 and it's independent rear suspension. It's still a great full size SUV mainly because of the fundamentals, but it's styling on the inside and out is just dated.

[@zackisawesome11]

+Camerons Car Reviews Everything is dated to you though. You say that a car that has only been produced for 3 years is dated. A car can't have a dated interior if it's only a few years old. Sorry bud.

[@TheKillerace900]

+Randy Wild but they good my mom has a 2003 eddi bower one and still works fine and in style .

[@ravenjames3873]

i disagree with that 4.5 star rating. that's the top of line platinum trim level. i could see if it was the xlt or something, cause i give that atleast 4 stars. but when the top of the line platinum has hard touch plastic on the dash and where you rest your elbows on the door is a fail in my book, especially when the truck is $67k. i does have leather seats, but that's about the only nice thing it has going for it. so for me it's a 3.5 star rating.

[@charger121212]

unfortunately, car has a lot of design drawback..for example, rear Door Belt Weatherstrips are not sealing, there is a gap which allows mud and water to enter leading to glass window to be scratched when lowering and lifting the glass.. other issue, moon roof rattles when driving on unpaved road also not sealed enough and area got rusted..

[@coureurdebois]

looks like its from the early 2000 in terms of design and the interior is simply disgustingly cheap and this is the top of the line trim as well, not to mention that eco boost TTV6 under load is disappointing getting worse MPG and less durable than the comparable V8... should have let customers option in the 5.0 V8.... under load those TTv6's simply get some of the worst MPG in class for those who use theirs for towing.

[@spydoorman7583]

+justin bouche The hate on the the good old indestructible v8 continues in America, fuck boosting.

[@coureurdebois]

Lord Aether i wish they would have let the 5.0 be a option at least : /

[@spydoorman7583]

justin bouche Yeah, the Ecoboost engines are only good for recreational driving.

[@coureurdebois]

Lord Aether not even recreational, they are good for doing MPG roller tests.

[@billpeirce7127]

Needs the 5.0l v8

[@seanc6468]

The EcoBoost is amazing. I have both a v8 and v6. My 8 is powerful but the 6 is fast. Wow fast. To each his own..

[@ozomini3400]

V6? DAMN, WE SAY MUSTANGS DONT NEED THEM

[@zachpittman1850]

If this engine was in the Mustang it would be stupid fast. Faster than the 5.0 Mustang GT probably. Stock, of course.

[@edmondsentertainmentllc3478]

Couldn't even get into it. O.P. Uploaded a lazy, half finished vid. Thumbs down for o.p.

[@syedabu6859]

cant beat the CHEVY

[@williejefferson9823]

the engine sounds like crap.67k.i don't think so.calling all idiots!

[@Notify57]

willie jefferson you look like crap fucking hater you prolly a trump supporter and if you don’t like this truck don’t complain and watch another video bitch ass broke 👦

[@Notify57]

So smd and stfu

[@williejefferson9823]

will not pay more than 40k . that's my final offer.

[@TheKillerace900]

these car last u long.

[@williejefferson9823]

So will a range rover.only an idiot will pay 67k for a ford.wake up people! Now i can see why we've got a muslim president that is from kenya africa.the U.S citizens are"for the lack of a better term"stupid!!

[@williejefferson9823]

***** no not kidding.a range rover will out last your great grandchildren.

[@jeremyashley1]

Consumer Reports Indicate this is a Typical Ford ---- unreliability, numerous mechican issues, new Transmission needed at 75,000 miles?

[@XuAlchemist]

崔 v 吧v 吧 v 次吧常常刺激經濟刺激刺激刺激次 v 呢，bkka

[@MeliorIlle]

Ew ghey

[@vitzrnik8142]

67000$????????? Only fool would buy this....

[@TheKillerace900]

no they wont .its there money and u will spend it how ever you want .

[@jedknutson8373]

this is one of the most over priced vehicles on the market...period...

[@DeadofWinter321]

So is the Tahoe and it's siblings... Highly overrated too.

[@TheKillerace900]

check the Cadillac escalade