Can Ben Wikler Fix The Democratic Party?

[@elliot7678]

The only time I’ve felt a sense of hope since Bernie’s run in 2020 was when Tim Walz was calling Republicans weirdos and Elon Musk a dipshit. Whoever the next candidate is, they need to bring that energy. And it needs to be the frontrunner, not the vice president.

[@brettcollins7041]

Very true

[@AnonymousAnonymous-fm9iw]

yep and then kamalas genius campaign put Walz to the side so whe could campaign with liz cheney.....genius

[@Damacles9]

Some free $peech is more equal than 300+ million Americans.

[@Kain5th]

@@AnonymousAnonymous-fm9iw that was Kamala listening more to the Clintons, the dnc over her own campaign aides. The time before the DNC was the best of that campaign

[@AdultThirdCultureKid1971]

@@AnonymousAnonymous-fm9iw I blame Hillary Clinton's old campaign team for putting Walz to the side during Kamala's campaign. 😡

[@billmack3588]

If he won't budge on corporate/superPAC money in primaries, it is going to be really really hard to fix the brand. The money will not let the Dems be popular.

[@briancfield]

10000% democrats have lost so much trust

[@JohnCarterRocks]

The democratic brand is fine. The wuss philosophy of allowing republicans to break the rules while democrats adhere to them has to stop. Get dirty or get the F .. out of the way.

[@rwick45]

Exactly.

[@LelouchVi572]

he also said campaigning with chenny wasn't a bad idea

[@billmack3588]

@@LelouchVi572 eesh. Not a good sign..sigh

[@tonygomez4966]

Y’all should get Ben to come on the show. I would be curious to see his pitch to progressive voters who are disillusioned with the Democratic Party.

[@jet-fury]

He was on BP with Ryan grim

[@capdyn735]

He was on the Bulwark with Sam Stein as well. I'd love to see him on the majority report or Kulinski's show answering questions from a progressive organisation though.

[@JamCliche]

NATION. WIDE. PERMANENT. CAMPAIGN.

[@Cettywise]

Sounds expensive 🫰😏

[@BWSC81]

Fighting to un-gerrymander states has got to be at least a top 10 goal. Would totally switch up federal and state congresses and propel the country into a much more democratic place.

[@blankblank2370]

And RCV!

[@joshieecs]

we need to do gerrymandering accelerationism. blue states should pull out the stops and gerrymander red districts to oblivion. if we can pass universal, national bans on gerrymandering then I support that. but unilateral anti-gerrymandering is just handing power to the GOP we need to go further and add a bunch of new blue states. no less then 10 Californias. every NYC borough it's own state. etc no rule against it, the constitutional path is actually really simple too

[@brettcollins7041]

I’m done with TYT. Full on with Majority Report. Way better

[@picahudsoniaunflocked5426]

Welcome. Left is best!

[@deanmoriarty6015]

a wise decision

[@boomieboo]

TYT is like the WWE version of Sam and the Majority Report. For Cenk and Ana being progressive is just a performative act and a mask you wear when the cameras are on. For Sam and Emma, it's the real thing. They're the MMA fighters in the ring while TYT is just going over scripted choreographed fights with their "opponents" who are their friends in real life.

[@ruen971]

😂😂😂

[@rlcmza6705]

TYT is just a grifter channel now like so many. I can't count how many KZbinrs have went right for money. Those guys have no conviction.

[@captainhowdy9845]

The campaign for 2028 has to start now.

[@track1949]

Oy ... the midterms in 2026 are next

[@USS_Sentinel]

No, the one for 2026 has to start now. Make it a blue wave like 2006 was.

[@drewspods]

@@track1949 You can do 2 things at once

[@tbowden49]

@@drewspods most of the people in these comments won’t even vote in the primaries, I would prefer not getting ahead of things

[@jacobquackenbush2981]

People hate politics left or right. We need to run a campaign that is a love letter to America rather than a barrage of policy. We need to make people fall in love with our candidates

[@caymuscairns6845]

Unless the 50 state strategy includes addressing wealth inequality, he wont be able to change anything.

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

It's basically the only issue the democrats should run on

[@corvacopia]

If you have a 50 state strategy, it’ll be harder to run without at least some of the candidates taking that up as an issue

[@maxrobespierre9176]

The Democratic Party is not reformable as long as anyone who has been part of the problem holds any power.

[@tbowden49]

That stupid, there are not many pieces that need to fall

[@jacobquackenbush2981]

As much as I love Joe Biden, I’m relieved that he’s not going to be the head of the party. We need younger people, like Pete Butigege and Andy Bashear. Bring out AOC every now and then to get people fired up, she’s a little to liberal for some people, not me, but some

[@ishanbhatt1123]

@@jacobquackenbush2981 we need a fresh face, not the same old politicians. AOC s great but idk if she wan win . We need a progressive outsider like John Stewart or someone like that

[@patchwurk6652]

@@jacobquackenbush2981 ...The fact you "love" Joe Biden leads me to believe you're wholly in favor of what keeps making the Dems fail.

[@simonkapadia7582]

There's no room for separation of messaging and policy. You need policies that are clear, bold, and tailored towards the majority of people. I'm describing policy like messaging because in context it is. When you're in power you do lots of things you never campaigned on, but the planks of your campaign have to be policies that speak to what your big ideas are, what your goals are, who you are trying to look out for, who you are serving. Trump can run on tariffs because they're a rorshach to most voters, who don't really understand them. So some of them think they're a cudgel to punish other nations, others think it's industrial strategy to build up american manufacturing, others think they'll raise money to help fund programmes. And if business complains, because, you know, it'll hurt everyone including business, that just sounds like elite interests don't like it. Tariffs were a genius move for a populist without any policy acumen. Bernie has often focused on healthcare because it's a proxy for class, who needs politicians to get them free healthcare? The people who can't afford it right now. It sends a clear message that he's for them, even before you hear him speak. It gives him a focus, a core he can build his message around. Student loan forgiveness is actually a pretty bad policy in this way, incidentally, in part because it's not an ongoing policy, it affects some people at some particular time to some given degree, if you already paid yours off it feels bad, if you never had one in the first place it feels bad, etc. Good policies are ones that clearly signal to the largest possible groups that you are for them, that you have a plan to help them, and that that is your priority. If the democrats are ever going to win, and admittedly, it's far too late to prevent generational damage. The damage Trump did in 2016 was pretty extensive, not least due to all the judges, and the damage he'll do now will be far worse. But if the dems are going to win they need a policy core to build their message around. And that's the single most important thing they need to focus on. Actually getting the party on board with such a policy. The messenger matters, the message matters, but the policy is core.

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

A brand new deal for the working class, need that FDR messaging

[@TheEvolver311]

​@itcouldbelupus2842 They would need to combat the 50 years anti-new deal propaganda. While individual ideas like universal Healthcare poll well, things like a new government program doesn't poll so well.

[@MrSwj2009]

The democratic party is the saddest political institution 😢

[@nutmegriot209]

its too infected to revive within 2 or 4 years. we all want something new for a reason

[@notaspeck6104]

Young people need to get into local politics and rebuild the party from the ground up.

[@JohnCarterRocks]

You need a mental evaluation. Democrats won elections in 2018, 2020, 2022. Democrats allowed Insurrectionist Criminal Trump decide that laws and rules don't apply to him. Democrats need to show a backbone and get dirty.

[@mx248]

​@@notaspeck6104 They won't.

[@Robbay363]

tbf this attitude is kinda why we're here. States in which progressives actually got involved with the democrats have seen big changes. This waiting around for something better to show up won't accomplish anything.

[@Buffaloguy1991]

The Dems will never let him near power

[@TimmyTheTinman]

He’s one of the front runners, actually a lot of left-wing people are the front runners

[@jccathc2640]

This is what I've been wanting from the Majority Report! Thank you for giving us some names and a positive message!

[@ishanbhatt1123]

everyone that's complaining about ben wikler not being a good candidate, needs to realize that he doesn't determine the perception of the democratic party. hes responsible for running campaigns, which he is already better at doing, given his track record in Wisconsin. the presidential candidate/demcoratic politicians are the ones that affect the perception of the dems. he's only there to provide dems the resources and permeant campaign needed to win. Democratic candidates are the ones that need to populist and change the dparty's perception among voters.

[@nothingtoseehere411]

To answer the question in the title: No.

[@daruekeller]

he's welcome to try, he will or he won't, but if he's to have much chance, he better be in peoples faces all the time with plans rather than criticism.

[@emma_green]

Ben Wikler is running? Great news!

[@PantherU]

If you want to capture the talent that made Milwaukee complete the assignment, you don't want Ben Wikler - you want Angela Lang.

[@Johnnyraftssmith]

Either one would be better than who's currently in charge

[@sorzin2289]

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result

[@drewspods]

I haven't watched this yet & have no idea who this guy is - But I'll venture a guess that no he can't lol.

[@codyyaw2537]

Too late. Not sure anything matters after 2016.

[@Halokon]

Nice try, Peter Coffin, I’m on to you!

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

Lol, it's pretty funny how hard that guy fell off

[@williammcfarlane6153]

But this highlights one of the issues I see as a whole.... We can complain about the Democrats all day long, but the reality is there is no real left-wing cohesiveness in our country either. We have so many different left-wing media ego projects but very few on the ground pushing for political, economic, or social power... When I went to vote there were numerous positions that a running Republican or Democrat was uncontested. So talking about what the Democrats did wrong and what they should do to fix it. This seems like mental masturbation when we can't even build the coalitions to be a challenge to and/or force the Democrats to change direction...

[@persianwingman]

Left-lib Sam will spend all day advocating for Democrats rather than acknowledge the fact that any left project has to be from the ground up and divorced from the Democrats and not just ‘better’ politicians winning safe seats in blue districts.

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

​@@persianwingmanI think Sam would be more than happy to acknowledge that fact. Call in and ask him if you are so confident

[@persianwingman]

@@itcouldbelupus2842since you like being the reply guy to everyone in this comment section, why don’t you call the show and tell us how great this generic Democrat is?

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

@@persianwingman That's not an opinion I have though

[@docholiday8029]

No. Billionaires own both parties. Our only HOPE is Divine intervention. Frodo lives

[@jan-willemvandijk3850]

Actually, it's Bilbo

[@mirasbrush4607]

Ron Howard Voice: "He couldn't."

[@rabidbigdog]

How does that tabloid rule of headlines go - "any headline that ends with a question mark can be answered with NO". Video title in this example.

[@foxstele]

The phrase "nation wide permanent campaign" gives me anxiety.

[@jet-fury]

Saw winklers interview on breaking points. Not impressed

[@Gramsciwastoo]

No.

[@fugazi225]

Thanks for info

[@tinoyb9294]

Meanwhile, the planet is on fire.

[@BWSC81]

I worry, for all the reasons that Ben is great, they are also reasons they won't pick him. I don't know much about those who vote for the position, but I fear they - at best - are subconsciously neoliberal as well, and so would prefer not to see him in that position.

[@SuperAsefasef]

Without Ben and Evers Wisconsin would be like Florida right now. He knows how to win and that’s what matters. He’s not a candidate, he doesn’t have message to run on, and amazing rhetoric. He’s an organizer. He knows how to fight from behind and claw back territory, and we are gonna need that now more than ever.

[@titussardonicus338]

You can't fix electoral politics in general. Elections are the laziest and least effective tool in the toolbox. By all means, keep using it, but let's talk about what else we're doing.

[@tbowden49]

Every billionaire appreciates you thinking this

[@titussardonicus338]

@tbowden49 I want you to think long and hard about what you're saying. Don't you think it's far more likely that billionaires love to have the public convinced that voting is their sole form of political action? Who do you think controls the electoral process in this country? This election featured two candidates heavily supported by the billionaire class. In fact, any alternative candidates are, without fail, primaried out of any meaningful race by monied interests. Honestly, you sound like a plant to me.

[@ashfox7498]

@@titussardonicus338 Reducing everything to "the billionaire class controls it, so don't bother wasting time" really giving out that college freshman who just heard about Marx 4 weeks ago vibes. Elections would not have allowed Trump to go anywhere near power, or cost billions of dollars to run if it was some complete illusion of choice from the loominati; but it is a nice way to cope with disappointing election results.

[@titussardonicus338]

@ashfox7498 i didn't think i was unclear, but i didn't say "don't bother voting". I said it's the laziest form of political action, and the least effective. If your only political activity is voting and condescending to strangers on the internet, you're less than useless.

[@voxomnes9537]

Savage​@@titussardonicus338

[@joeheart5506]

Experienced and has a clear plan based on past successes. He doesn't stand a chance.

[@fozzyozzy1030]

As a wisconsin Democrat no way the democrats here are holding on by a hair not making any crazy gains with voters.

[@corvacopia]

The only real hope I have that he could win is that a 50 state yearlong campaign provides job security for bureaucrats who get to vote in these things

[@Nathan-w5b2h]

Wikler's interview on Breaking Points was a bit disheartening. Seems to be more of the same. I think I am on team Martin

[@track1949]

He's not dynamic or interesting at all.

[@tonygomez4966]

⁠@@track1949im skeptical about his campaign too but does the guy pulling the strings behind the scenes need to be super dynamic or interesting? Shouldn’t his efficacy be what really matters?

[@avinashreji60]

@@tonygomez4966true, behind the scenes is not the same as campaigning

[@brandongers]

@@track1949I’ve met and interviewed him multiple times. This is a prerecorded message. He’s completely different in person.

[@patchwurk6652]

@@tonygomez4966 The person behind the scenes needs to prove they're actually good at being in that position first. And I'm about 99% certain the overwhelming majority of people's response to the name in the title of this video was "Who?"

[@zachmt6223]

Distribution of funding for state parties and local Democrats needs to be a priority! After Senate races like Jon Tester, the money dries up. Can't run a permanent campaign and have a well-oiled organizing operation every year with the current strategy and how it's being spent. Republicans in red states understand this very well.

[@RustyShackleford-s2o]

I quit the dnc the day after the biden debate for lying to us and stating he was "virile" and ready to win. This Wisconsin guy sounds like the right man at the right time. If they choose him I'll rejoin the party.

[@princessbailey4027]

long-time supporter. 53 yo black woman, please move on with solutions .... too negative, to me after this defeat. Talk Dearborn and why Latinos thought of themselves as other and voted for Trump. This is where the conversation starts..

[@petercollingwood522]

You won't like the answer.

[@fabienmerteuil6226]

Heard this guy on Chuck Todd. Talks like a politician and he can’t quit Kamala🤦🏻‍♂️

[@corvacopia]

He’s not someone who’d be running for office, what matters is how he runs a party and how he’s been doing that has been good

[@Andrew-of8uq]

@@corvacopiathis exactly

[@patchwurk6652]

@@corvacopia The current up-and-coming President and administration suggests otherwise, but okay.

[@ABC_Guest]

I was disappointed by Wikler in the Democratic primaries this year - he decided to only list Biden as a candidate, despite Phillips & Williamson being notable (even if uncompetitive) candidates running. Not super democratic of him. Phillips sued, and the WI Supreme Court agreed & ordered that he be added to the ballot.

[@Roofers-Nail-Hardest]

Nope

[@comments8742]

Ben Wikler was at a J Street conference. That doesn't excite me. In January of this year, J Street said there was no genocide in Gaza.

[@Drahkir9]

That thumbnail made me think Mr Beast was getting into politics

[@Effective_tool_of_Satan]

You mean turning the party into a worker's party? Nope

[@Garlicnautt]

The next guy has to come out RIGHT now. An indefinite campaign.

[@qwertyz212]

And let Trump win the state....thats usually called a "L"... Carry on...

[@Teemie123]

2:18 Add Florida's gerrymandering in and there would not be a Republican majority in the House

[@daricklapaglia4337]

No. They aksed him on breaking points if he would keep taking corporate money and he dodged the question.

[@greghodges2116]

Ben Wikler is on Bluesky

[@calvinware7957]

Martin O malley is just an ego maniac after a promotion. Dude was the literal inspiration for Carceti in the wire

[@gymrules27]

Ben Wickler would be an amazing chair of the Democratic Party for the next four years. Hopefully he can energize progressives, moderate Democrats, Independents, and some Republicans to vote for Democratic candidates in 2026 and 2028.

[@catrantery]

You're hired

[@lauriecraw5033]

Will Wixler get rid of the tired old Dem consultants? Will he get corporate money out of the party funding?

[@nathanstruble2177]

"I've spent my life working in politics" there's the death of that entire political campaign.

[@zacharyboblitt1244]

I agree someone having an experience in a field is bad. That's why I like my doctor to have no experience. My doc will then have fresh ideas like pulling my heart out of my butt. Such a smart take Nate!

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

Exactly, problems don't get solved by competent leaders, they get solved by outsiders coming in and shaking things up! Everyone knows that

[@kelechiaguocha6125]

A nationwide permanent campaign 💯👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@SusanBloodgood-o5s]

We need Ben Wikler, we witnessed the prequel to Project 2025 here in Wi in 2011 when these same Freaks were testing out their shiny new toy ( Citizens United) and have been fighting the good fight, it never ends, this same crap was done in other States as well, Ben Wikler knows how to fight the good fight 💪🏽🇺🇸

[@szahmad2416]

I saw him on breaking points. Nope, no he won’t. Won’t even pledge to throw out billionaire funding. Said Liz Cheney being sent to Michigan and Wisconsin was not a bad idea.

[@HupertBupkin]

Get real. You can just feel when someone isn’t going to SAVE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Y’all don’t even sound excited. Get real.

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

"the vibe is just off, you can feel it. Politics is all about vibes"

[@HupertBupkin]

@ What’s that from lmao I don’t know that IP, totally agreed though

[@ashfox7498]

@@itcouldbelupus2842 On the one hand the Democrats narrowly defeated Trump and lost to him twice and all three of the last Democratic candidates have been disappointing ho-hum candidates nobody on the left was really energized to vote for. That's a lack of vibe to notice. On the other hand the Republicans felt like a deflated balloon compared to 2020 and they still got basically the same amount of votes as back then; so maybe vibes are BS

[@patchwurk6652]

@@itcouldbelupus2842 You may laugh at that comparison, but the Party that got absolutely steamrolled by nothing BUT vibes from the GOP doesn't really get to act like it knows what it's doing.

[@tu4764]

This is great. It'll help with our media game. If we can't get a Rogan, we can start with a Cpac and Turning point alternatives. Maybe even prageru, like the Gravil Institute.

[@jesse_cole]

Who? No. There's no person who can fix the Dems. Stop wasting our time. Third party.

[@stevieweevyC]

Start getting ballot in every state

[@ashfox7498]

Third party is an even bigger joke than someone who was sincerely shocked Kamala wasn't a hyper progressive radical.

[@Eldeecue]

Pretty sure Gaetz can just come back and be sworn in in January. He resigned from the CURRENT Congress, not the next.

[@getaclew]

Lol. Nope 😂

[@Awntea]

We dont have to have a professional politico do we? Id rather have someone in the seat who isnt worried about keeping it. Someone like Shawn Fain. She was saddled with Biden staff. I don't think that helped. Neoliberalism and those connected to it are toast. Lots of folks understand organizing and many do it everyday for free. Im not sure focusing on 'skill set' is the right priority. 45 campaigned on disruption. Fain is someone unafraid to be disruptive.

[@jamesmassey356]

Can't fix liberalism as a political philosophy.

[@stevieweevyC]

Yes you can.

[@dr.primitiveradioangel3946]

Ken Martin all the way

[@gnostic268]

Ben looks very generic. Same old, same old. He doesn't even look excited about the Dem Party. Sleepy Ben. I can hear it now.

[@itcouldbelupus2842]

I see you think politics is mostly about vibes like republicans huh?

[@d_dave7200]

@@itcouldbelupus2842 It is though, whether we want it to be or not.

[@Damacles9]

500 plutocrats to convice? Psshaw!

[@emmma326]

Can you get Ben Wikler on the show?

[@andyprompt]

No

[@track1949]

His delivery is boring.

[@brandongers]

k

[@capdyn735]

The head of the DNC is supposed to manage the committee and its internal workings, not be charismatic for public appearances.

[@ThePalmer81]

Would it kill these people to have a personality? Lol.

[@EricDaMAJ]

No. Personality is for Republicans. The Democratic Party is too full of SJWs craving to virtue signal on anyone with a personality committing a speech crime for personalities.

[@donavanbremness4666]

you guys are wrong he is not the one who put Evers in or won supreme court.he is corp just like Tammy what is changing here is people are sick of right wing I know I live here

[@christopherneil8265]

I’m gonna guess no, based on his face and nothing else.

[@brandongers]

I’ve met and interviewed him many times, you’re wrong…

[@shinjuku1834]

Game manager

[@sonicblackhole3559]

Wikler for the win

[@Ish-k4l]

It can’t just be about a nonstop, year round campaign. Once you get into office you have to pass legislation that is impactful to the majority of working people. Otherwise we’ll just have this flip flop every 4/8 years like we’ve had my entire life. WWFDRD.

[@Dennis_The_Dude]

Nobody can. Stop lying to yourselves.

[@lushlife6864]

If by fix you mean give a new face to neo liberal Democrats then YES. I live here in Wisconsin. He's a good speaker representing the same old politics.

[@Lambda_Ovine]

how low must the bar be that's now progress because the establishment Dems won't even work on a good message anymore...

[@Catabogus]

Is this Zogby's guy?

[@Monthlyjune]

"if they democrats are serious about winning" lol

[@nh5739]

Why don't we just try the strategy that just won? Dancing on stage for 45 min, fighting with journalists, nonsensical rambling with 'tarriffs' thrown in from time to time??

[@Muse22sims]

Algorithm

[@ipadstuf]

Am I the only one that thought this was Mr beast

[@truegrit2060]

4:03 Except for the civil rights of American citizens with Japanese descent during world war II.😏

[@ajrimmer7231]

Actually, The Harris margin was .8 under Trump in Wisconsin. The best of all the swing states. Ben Wikler truly knows what he's doing.

[@JordanConley808]

Short answer, NO. Go Green!

[@bugviddump7397]

The only person who could "fix" the democratic party was called Robespierre.

[@awaisashai4374]

Wikler is aipac approved

[@brandongers]

Who’s Wicker?

[@awaisashai4374]

@@brandongerssry Wikler got autocorrected. His interview with Counter Points was not encouraging. Sounded very bought by all the big super pacs

[@tylerhackner9731]

He’s the best choice to

[@gregsvlogshow]

but but but he has to go on Joe Rogan, though. And invite Liz Chaney on the stage with him. Otherwise, how does he win?

[@brandongers]

He’s not running for President… he’s running for DNC Chair…

[@stitchcrafter]

YES, YES, YES, I'm all in on Ben Wikler!!!

[@TheJofurr]

I'm a Mac. And I'm an NPC.

[@gtitboij2586]

Theres nothing wrong with the democratic party

[@hyperbolic-time-chamber-strand]

He would be a good start Democrats need to stop trying to put all these women candidates on a pedestal just because. Look how well that turned out... Time for dems to go back to their roots.

[@EricDaMAJ]

Maybe if the Democrats had female candidates that weren’t garbage?

[@hyperbolic-time-chamber-strand]

@EricDaMAJ No women have dropped the ball so hard they need to try again in 100yrs or so maybe if that.

[@EricDaMAJ]

@@hyperbolic-time-chamber-strand The Democrats could've had Tulsi Gabbard.

[@gfys756]

​@@EricDaMAJ Ew. Tulsi the Russian asset and Assad toady? No thank you.

[@tbowden49]

@@EricDaMAJ Tulsi Gabbard is a literal psy-op intelligence agent who has been on active duty up until this past campaign for Trump and is a religious extremist. Naming her as not garbage means you are a moron.

[@charleslanphier8094]

The Dems need to either stop nominating women or get used to losing.

[@hwhack]

The problem is zombie corporate drones.

[@MF-ty2zn1]

What's your response to Gore, Dukakis, and Kerry losing? Harris missed by 43,000 votes in 3 states and statistically speaking Trump did not win all 7 swing states. Funny business going on with this election. Trump stated, "We have the swing states FIXED. We don't even need your vote. "

[@EricDaMAJ]

They could get women nominees that aren’t garbage.

[@Savalatte]

They've only nominated two and one of them won the popular vote. The other won a huge chunk of the vote. Many presidental nominees have done far worse.

[@RibblesMcSnoo]

​@@Savalatte neither one of them was nominated by the voters. Both were undemocratically anointed by the DNC.

[@txnmia8613]

Sadly i think it will be Rahm because of his association with Obama.