Can I Go To An SSPX Mass? Are Trad Priests Worse Then Ordinary Priests?

[@arialthor]

I've been baptized & receive my first comunion in SSPX... I fall in Love with Catholicism because of TLM thru SSPX🙏

[@matthewanderson9849]

I have been attending an SSPX mass for nearly 4 years now and I will never go to a No mass ever again. The SSPX mass is beautiful, its transformative. I feel something real, and it places me in a mindset where I cannot but know I am about to share in something amazing. Our Priests are so consistent in their actions, teachings and messages.

[@RickW-HGWT]

I think your experiencing holiness and reverence, that the NO lacks so often.

[@thomasmiller2657]

With the Archdiocese of Baltimore planning to close 40 of its 61 parishes, hopefully the SSPX can take over some of these with the hope that the TLM and traditional catholic teachings can bring a resurgence.

[@erinmarie99]

In our FSSP Church, we have confession happening for the duration of the entire mass or the end of line…whichever comes first.

[@DavGre]

I love that confession is so available that it guarantees that I can make sure to be in an absolute state of grace before receiving the body of Christ

[@benevenuto9794]

how disrespectful. confessions before/after Sunday mass fine but not during. this sounds like the sex obsessed young martin luther who would go to confession seconds before celebrating mass. if the confessor is not able to distinguish between sin and psychological obsession he is missing something.

[@DavGre]

@@benevenuto9794 it’s more important to be in a state of grace, and sometimes 30 minutes before mass is not enough time to get through every person in line, so they allow some time into mass for people to be in a state of grace by the time of communion. That’s more respectful than telling people who were last in line that they have to wait until the end of mass

[@benevenuto9794]

@@MoonTyphoon-j4u that is a parody of true religion. follow the pope not blind guides.

[@David-ep2hg]

You dont have to receive communion every time you go to mass. You can make a spiritual communion and actually attend mass instead of doing an examination of conscious.

[@Straitsfan]

The things they say about Lefebvre and what he did were said about Athanasius in the 4th century -- and he's a saint.

[@beatlecristian]

What did St. Athanasius do?

[@marcdecastella3454]

@@beatlecristian He saved the Church by resisting the terrible heresy of Arianism which threatened to engulf the Church in the Fourth Century.

[@beatlecristian]

@@marcdecastella3454 Wow, I mean well with my question but weren’t there also saints who supported antipopes?

[@marcdecastella3454]

@@beatlecristian Yes, the great St Vincent Ferrer unwittingly backed an anti- Pope during the Great Western Schism (1378-1417). In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, there were three claimants to the Papacy ; Gregory X11 (Rome ); Benedict X111(Avignon ); John XX111 (Piza ). The Council of Constance was convened on November 5th, 1414 to resolve the schism. After this Council forced the three Popes to resign, the Council elected Pope Martin V in 1417.

[@marcdecastella3454]

@@beatlecristian Yes, the great St Vincent Ferrer unwittingly backed an anti Pope during the Great Western Schism (1378-1417). In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, there were three claimants to the Papacy ; Gregory X11 (Rome) ; Benedict X111 (Avignon ) ; John XX111 (Piza). The Council of Constance was convened on November 5th, 1414 to resolve the schism. After this Council forced the three Popes to resign, the Council elected Pope Martin V in 1417.

[@trevwilliams2138]

I go to an FSSP run Mass. And I have 2 choices. One is about 10 minutes away, the other 30 minutes away. But I wouldn’t hesitate to go to an SSPX Mass. in fact I have. I have that opportunity. It’s about 40 minutes away.

[@Senor_spielbergo]

Wish had one 10 mins away, fssp for me is 45 mins away, and I think the sspx is close to an hour.

[@PrometheanKitchen96]

That's the same piece with me. The SSPX was the only Trad group available in the area where I live so therefore that made it the obvious choice and I had those concerns originally myself

[@Straitsfan]

It isn't just about the Mass, but everything that surrounds it: the catechesis, etc.

[@stevenmccallan9202]

I was stuck in the Novus Ordo for 3 decades and finally in disgust, walked away. Thank God that He then led me to the traditional Mass and only attend it now. I will never attend another NO even if that means I can't attend a traditional Mass on Sunday. I'm at total peace with my decision. I pray God that one day, Holy Mother the Church gives an anathema to this protestant imitation service.

[@cruznature7545]

What was it that you didn't like about the NO?

[@TP-iv3os]

Excellent point on confession and Mass. It stands to reason that Francis would not say go to confession and then go find Mass elsewhere. It has always surprised me that Francis gave the faculties of confession to SSPX knowing the animosity he has toward TLM. However, I'm glad he did but I'm sure tougher times and more confusion are to come...like taking away the faculties, creating more scandal for the laity. I recommend a very well written book called, SSPX: The Defence.

[@henryvonblumenthal7307]

In Misericordia et Misera, the instrument by which Pope Francis granted faculties to the SSPX to hear confessions, he refers to Catholics who « for various reasons » (he evidently doesn’t care what reasons) go to SSPX Masses as « faithful ». Is it necessary to say more?

[@gemma950]

It's almost 3 years since I went to the SSPX chapel for the first time in my life. I really love the TLM and respect and cherish the SSPX priests and pray for them everyday. Since I found your channel about one month ago, I noticed that your videos are helpful to me in that they give a look from another layman of SSPX. I want you to make more videos regarding SSPX and TLM. Thank you for your effort and zeal. May Our Lady bless you abundantly.

[@bolapromatoqueejogodecampe8718]

Another week, another awesome video from I Miss Christendom!

[@RPlavo]

I grew up in the old Christendom where people were terrified of dying and meeting an angry Gof, not to mention all the child abuse that was going on and tolerated at every level

[@bolapromatoqueejogodecampe8718]

@@RPlavo In just a few words you were able to say so much nonsense that even Biden would be proud of you! Truly, you are a champion among modernists.

[@RPlavo]

@@bolapromatoqueejogodecampe8718 I lived it; Pius X was an iconoclast (upending nineteen centuries of tradition by putting first communion before confirmation). Just the facts Jack

[@bolapromatoqueejogodecampe8718]

@@RPlavo How old are you, 250 years old? Christendom went into a comma with the French Revolution. Cite a document demonstrating rampant abuse ( I will give you a pass here) before Vatican II.

[@AK_Catholic_Traditional]

My SSPX Chapel is the ONLY Traditional Latin Mass in my Country. And it’s a 5min drive. The choice is obvious…

[@TJBowman-vr1co]

I wish mine was 5 minutes away

[@rubenmartinez4346]

SSPX all day every day.

[@wildhunt3302]

I don’t have an fssp or sspx near me but I’m drawn to the tlm so I’m asking for clarification. From what I can find, they say it’s ok to go to sspx if you can’t make it to a regular diocesan mass. But you make it sound like you can go anytime. Not attacking, I genuinely want to know. I plan on joining the Catholic Church and want my first mass when I’m confirmed to be TLM.

[@ginomaietta2702]

I've been watching many if not all your videos and MANY other Catholic channels since December of 2023 (hundreds of videos and dozens of books). I've posted a few critical comments on some videos early on during my phase of learning more about the Catholic faith (spoiler alert). last month I signed up me AND my 2 adult sons in RCIA (now OCIA). I have attended the one diocesan Latin mass in town, I plan on attending an SSPX mass soon, and I was invited to a Maronite mass which I will gladly attend also. I'm 47, and having been a "protester" from the day I was born and now leaving that to become Catholic I don't have the heart or spiritual strength to start another "fight" although I agree with many of the issues you raise. I will randomly attend SSPX and diocesan Latin mass but I feel the need to be faithful to the church that made me convert and it's wonderful priest, and pray for the Catholic Church as a whole; it's ok to choose the Latin mass but some of the commenters on your videos sound like the fundamental baptists I just left. No point to any of this but to say thanks for the education.

[@imisschristendom5293]

No problem, glad I could help. Novus ordo is valid and licit. If thats what you want, its better than nothing. Just be careful with ocia, my experience is they dont really teach the Catholic faith. Im sure there are some good one though.

[@ginomaietta2702]

@@imisschristendom5293 Could you please elaborate? I've ordered the Catechism Ascension edition to start on my own asap, I read the compendium months ago and it helped me understand a lot for sure. Do you suggest the Catechism of the Council of Trent and is that what you are referring to at all? Thank you!

[@karlheven8328]

​@@ginomaietta2702Yes the Trent Catechism is great❤

[@charlesmarchiano9531]

I wouldn’t go to a Vatican ll sect church, the SSPX is measurably better.

[@longinusokorie7885]

"Measurable"? Better? SSPX is much more of a Catholic. Please SSPX Mass & Sacraments are very much valid, don't get confused by words thrown around today about the Society. If we know the magninity of offence to our Lord due alteration of Liturgy after Vatican II, it was a handful of Cardinals and bishops stood their ground that includes Archbishop Marcel Lefebver. I have attended diocesan TLM, FSSP and SSPX

[@Straitsfan]

Francis has raised the issue of the scope of papal power and authority, which has always been discussed throughout the centuries.

[@calebnwafor2549]

I will take the Mass anywhere i can take it, I come for the Eucharist not for anything else.

[@genemyersmyers6710]

I would go to latin mass regardless no pope or any man can tell me i cant!!!

[@RickW-HGWT]

Watch them pull the holy spirit card, the sad out of context quotes of saints and religious on obedience and alike. Sad that they cannot defend the liturgical abuses but for the pathetic reasoning of finding a reverent NO, why are they not all reverent ?. This imbecile in the chair of Peter surrounds himself with heretics, perverts and traitors.

[@markpesotski7151]

SSPX is the purest form of Catholicism

[@joelwren5718]

The misleading claim often made about the SSPX is that they are not in “full communion” with Rome. But being in communion with Rome is binary. Either you are or you’re not The SSPX is in communion with Rome.

[@lalagordo]

Can you please help me and tell me how and where the PCED said that? I need help proving it to someone

[@michaellamb5534]

@lalagordo It is in his other videos about SSPX.

[@luannputman9102]

I am very new to the Catholic faith, watched one of your previous SSPX videos and found a Church close (ish) to me. I am very curious to see the difference.

[@miracles_metanoia]

How was it? TLM, Ordinariate and eastern rites (byzantine, ukrainian, ruthenian, coptic, etc) are also very reverent and beautiful, and some modern NO churches have priests that are bringing back reverence as well.

[@MrJoebrooklyn1969]

I've never seen an SSPX chapel.

[@AnaMaria-lo3tk]

I love the SSPX❤

[@Spiritof76Catholic]

In my Diocese we are lucky to have the NO, a Diocesan TLM and a ICKSP TLM. I don’t have an SSPX chapel anywhere near me. On any given weekend I will frequently go to the NO and one of the TLM’s. I prefer the TLM for the reverence (no talking and gossiping) and for the high mass liturgical music but personally find the Latin difficult. Maybe I’m just not smart enough to deal with it. When it comes to the NO I think the Church needs liturgical reforms. Bring back more Latin, communion on the tongue only from the priest, communion rails, Catholic liturgical music and get rid of Eucharistic ministers and lay people walking all over the sanctuary and touching the sacred vessels and the tabernacle.

[@angelocastro6394]

I confess i am being tired of videos about sspx... please do about... other stuff haha

[@imisschristendom5293]

Yeah, i plan on it. Probably wont see an sspx video for a while

[@angelocastro6394]

@@imisschristendom5293 Thank you very much for your answer and i am ansious for your next videos

[@CountryCatholic]

Can you do a video on the rise of neopaganism? It seems to be increasing and I am curious to know your thoughts on this topic.

[@vasjapremerl7270]

A standard for traditional priest is to be manly, hardent by fasting and disciplene. Therefore he is better equipet to fight his fallen nature, he knows about spiritual combat and all that. While NO priests in general dont concern with sin, dont wear uniforms, endolge in hobies and therefore are weaker and not alert about the evil ones snares. And most importantly they dont have the abondant flow of grace the TLM and traditional practisis give. Allso herecy (not saying that all NO priests are offcorse, but some sadly are) degenerates a person on all levels.

[@karlheven8328]

One should not be prideful about TLM vs NO though. This can lead down a rabbithole. TLM priests are not holier per se automatically, we need to not fall for neodonatism.in this. A lot of TLM priests are good due to correlation , and.them.being more inclined to say what traditionalists want to hear. But never put any priest on a pedastal.

[@vasjapremerl7270]

@@karlheven8328 It is not about pride or what somone wants to hear. it is not about the people. it is about truht and serving and pleasing God. I am not pridefull that i go to TLM, am im sad that 99% of Catholics go to NO wich slowly destroys their faith. I am sad that NO priests preach heresis and defile the Eucharists. So the whole buisness is a sourse of sorrow more than pride. If we say somthing to the NO catholics it is out of charity nt pride.

[@Hadtoleave15]

Can you please fix the title? It should read “than” rather than “then”.

[@ilovecatsijustlovecats3944]

SSPX is a Recognize and Resist (RR) Either he is THE pope or he isn't

[@nidusaquilae76]

If you have faculties you have facilities. If you knew canon law and the spirit behind it you would know that. Faculties for confessions prove we are Catholics who can validly and licitly exercise apostolate for the Church and several bishops and multiple officials in Rome have made it clear that SSPX Sunday Masses DO fulfill the Sunday obligation. Please look at what has actually been said and written. Don’t just come to your own view based on what you think.

[@gerardducharme2146]

I enjoy your program tonight to tell you the truth I was listening to one guy who lives in Poland. His programs were excellent right up until he started with the SSPX and he’s giving old news on the SSPX. He’s not giving any concrete stuff of what’s going on except mostly from the past about Pius, the fifth the council of Trent, what they would say about the SSPX and I’m just going Eman the church has gone through all that we know what the church has been doing. We know the heresies that were presented at that time and how the church dealt with it but now you have some people who come out and they’re all for the church they’re not Catholic And he defends the Catholic Church but and I say, but he’s trying to discredit the SSPX and he’s calling the SSPX this and that and I’m thinking we may have another Michael Lofton here so they tell you the truth. Avoid this guy. Tell me the program is pretty good when it deals with Islam and heresies, but on the SSPX and other people have went on his program and stipulated exactly like what I’m saying, so I’ll give you his first name Lloyd fill in the blanks, but he really really has a ask now to grind with the SSPX and I am not gonna be sitting and trying to get him to understand because he has gone down peoples throats over defending the SSPX and my two cents is not going to help to discredit what he has saying about it he will just block me and he’s done that with other people. i’m staying with the SSPX no matter what I can’t go back to where I was before it would be like me, cutting my nose off to spite my face. So I truly enjoy your program, sir. He was on Kennedy Hall’s program. And Kennedy Hall like myself we’re Canadians your program. Keep the faith and I’ll keep your daily in my rosary and with others, SSPX or not of the SSPX I pray for them nonetheless. I also pray for Mar Mari it was attacked earlier this week bye young, 15 or 16 year old Muslim. I pray for him to God bless.

[@oriongoa]

I think you're speaking about Lloyd de Jongh. I have just unsubscribed from his channel after watching all the nonsense on the SSPX. Mind you, I warned him about it after giving him some charitable advice about the SSPX

[@gerardducharme2146]

@@oriongoa yes, he’s going on the rampage

[@gerardducharme2146]

@@oriongoa I should likely say using AI to help him with his information, well, that’s gonna work against him, which it already has. Furthermore, as you see, it’s giving him the truth information he’s disseminating it’s not even up today. He still in the 1980s.

[@tojesusthroughmary8932]

🌹🌹🌹🙏

[@alswann2702]

The question should be can I go to a Novo Grosso "Mass". I attend a ICKSP Traditional Latin Mass.

[@jayguevara6153]

You make some really great points here! One thing that gets on my nerves though is the obsession with how someone is dressed when it comes to *daily Masses.* (TLM OR NO) Nobody should be expected to show up to any daily Mass wearing their "Sunday best" but rather whatever they would normally be wearing that day. If it's their work uniform: fine. If it's what they wear casually during the week: fine. I can obviously see the case for "you wouldn't show up to see the King in your jeans!" for the vigil or Sunday, but nobody ought to be pharisaically expected to be in a state of constant forma dress when they are daily or near-daily communicants. This King, that wants you to receive Him in the Most Blessed Sacrament, did not expect this of any of His followers.

[@imisschristendom5293]

The chapel I go to has Sunday mass and first Saturdays. Everyone comes more casual to Saturday mass. Everyday clothes.

[@alswann2702]

I suppose under that logic you'd show up at a wedding in jeans and a star bores tee or a work uniform.

[@jayguevara6153]

@@alswann2702 No, if I was going to a wedding I would dress for a wedding. Also: I'm committed to not arguing with people online and wish you well in spite of what I believe is a bad read of my "logic." I'm guessing you don't attend Mass daily, and that's ok, but if you did you would better understand my logic I believe. Let me give you one example: if someone worked in a parish office they would likely dress the way they do for work in attending the daily Mass that precedes their work day. I can think of more but I hope you understand where I'm coming from now.

[@alswann2702]

​@@jayguevara6153I see. You respect a bride, groom, their family and friends enough to dress appropriately for the occasion. Our Lord's real presence at the Holy Sacrafice of the Mass not so much.

[@jayguevara6153]

@@alswann2702 respectfully, you're in no position to judge me or my respect for the Lord. I hope you find humility and peace, brother. Edit: I saw your other comment on this video about attending an ICKSP parish. I too often attend a diocesan ICKSP parish and nobody there goes to daily Masses dressed like they were going to a wedding: they're literally going about their days in the normal decent clothes they wear.

[@sethw7399]

Glad Pope Francis allowed it. Hopefully for more years.

[@johngreene9824]

What is sspx

[@mcnzefili]

Society of Saint Pius the 10th (X) is what the acronym stands for. A lot of people who attend it look down on the Novus Ordo mass. Then, some members of the Novus Ordo mass attacked members of the SSPX in kind. As for me, I think the fight is silly and it really annoys me. It's enough trouble dealing with the lies of Protestants then to watch Catholics attack each other in like manner. I don't even involve myself, but will definitely come with swords swinging against an anticatholic that's for sure, only because they lie all the time and don't want to correct their errors.

[@NemoVir]

“For the Jubilee year”, didn’t say forever more. Given Pope Francis track history, FSSP is safer.

[@juangarza5532]

This video is eight minutes long and contains not a word about what Christianity is all about ! Nothing about the risen Christ, or God's grace and the forgiveness of sins. Nothing about the free gift of eternal life.

[@redneckpride4ever]

Are you a Christian or a Protestant?

[@BrianBenson-rc9mu]

What's wrong with Vatican II? FAQs 1. What is wrong with the Second Vatican Council? The Second Vatican Council taught doctrines which had been already condemned by the Church, and enacted disciplines which are contrary to the Church's teaching and constant practice. 2. What doctrines did it teach which were already condemned? There are four major errors concerning: (1) the unity of the Church; (2) ecumenism; (3) religious liberty; (4) collegiality. 3. What false doctrine does it teach concerning the unity of the Church? Vatican II teaches heresy concerning the unity of the Church, namely that the Church of Christ is not exclusively identified with the Catholic Church, but merely subsists in it. This heretical doctrine is contained principally in Lumen Gentium, and its heretical meaning is confirmed in statements of Paul VI and his successors, particularly in the 1983 Code of Canon Law, in the 1992 Statement concerning Church and Communion, and in the Ecumenical Directory. It is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Church, contained principally in Satis Cognitum of Pope Leo XIII, Mortalium Animos of Pope Pius XI, Mystici Corporis of Pope Pius XII, and in the condemnations of the "Branch Theory" made by the Holy Office under Pope Pius IX. 4. What false doctrine does it teach concerning ecumenism? The teaching of Vatican II concerning ecumenism, which states that non-Catholic religions are a "means of salvation," is overtly heretical. This doctrine directly contradicts the teaching of the Church that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, called by Pope Pius IX "a most well-known Catholic dogma." In addition, the ecumenical practices which have resulted from this heretical doctrine are directly contrary to Mortalium Animos of Pope Pius XI. 5. What false doctrine does it teach concerning religious liberty? The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty, contained in Dignitatis Humanae, nearly word for word asserts the very doctrine which was condemned by Pope Pius VII in Post Tam Diuturnas, by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos, by Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura, and by Pope Leo XIII in Libertas Praestantissimum. The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty also contradicts the royalty of Jesus Christ in society as expressed in Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI, and the constant attitude and practice of the Church with regard to civil society. 6. What false doctrine does it teach concerning collegiality? The teaching of Vatican II concerning collegiality alters the monarchical constitution of the Catholic Church, with which she was endowed by the Divine Savior. The doctrine of Vatican II, confirmed by the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which states that the subject (the possessor) of the supreme authority of the Church is the college of bishops together with the pope, is contrary to the defined doctrine of the Council of Florence and of Vatican I. 7. What is wrong with the disciplines which have emanated from Vatican II? The 1983 Code of Canon Law contains the heresy of Vatican II concerning the Church, mentioned above. It also permits sacrilege to the Blessed Sacrament, by approving of its reception by non-Catholics, which is a mortal sin, and permits communicatio in sacris (common public worship) with non-Catholics, which is a mortal sin. In addition, the Ecumenical Directory of 1993 permits ecumenical practices which have always been taught by the Church to be mortally sinful. 8. What does all this mean? It means that Vatican II and its subsequent reforms have given us a new religion, a religion which is substantially different from the Roman Catholic Faith founded by Christ. The reformers have substantially altered the three main components of religion: doctrine, worship, and discipline. The result is that the reformers are promoting a religion of ecumenism in place of the Roman Catholic religion, which has always taught that it alone is the one, true Faith, and that all other religions are false. The Vatican II religion teaches doctrines which have been condemned by the Church in the past. It has instituted rites and disciplines which are Protestant in nature. As a result, the religion which Catholics find in their local parishes and schools, although in name Catholic, is a new, non-Catholic religion already condemned by the Catholic Church. 9. Could it be that you are merely giving a bad interpretation to Vatican II? No. The heretical nature of this council is confirmed by: the doctrinal interpretation given to Vatican II by Paul VI and his successors in their decrees, encyclicals, catechisms, etc.; the series of abominations perpetrated by John Paul II against the First Commandment of God, in the form of ecumenical ceremonies which constitute false worship, even to pagan deities in some cases; the alteration of the Sacred Liturgy in such a way that the Catholic Mass has been replaced by a Protestant supper service; the tampering with the matter and form of the sacraments so that many of them, but most notably the Holy Eucharist and Holy Orders, labor under doubt or invalidity; the promulgation of disciplines, especially the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the Ecumenical Directory, which approve of sacrilege against the Holy Eucharist and the Sacrament of Matrimony, and which demonstrate heresies concerning the unity of the Church as their theoretical basis; the scandalous mockery made of the Sacrament of Matrimony by the granting of annulments for spurious reasons, constituting an abandonment of the sacred doctrine of the indissolubility of marriage; the fact that John Paul II is in communion with manifest heretics, has openly declared himself to be in communion with non-Catholic sects, and has recognized an apostolic mission in schismatic and Lutheran bishops, all of which destroys the unity of faith. He has even kissed the Koran, which explicitly denies the Incarnation and the Trinity. He has also publicly prayed that St. John the Baptist protect Islam.

[@DM-bd1hn]

Are trad priests worse? Lol...no. speaking from experience

[@RPlavo]

SSPX is schismatic, they pick and choose what parts of tradition they want to follow, and defy Jesus call for unity

[@R75423]

Hmmm...question is is a sin go to NO knowing how it was created.

[@fschutt247]

On a technical level, the NO is a "schismatic rite", since Quo Primum (1570) states that anyone who promulgates another rite and missal other than the one of Pius V. is disobedient, therefore schismatic. Only rites that are at least 200 years old were allowed (Coptic, Eastern, Latin, etc.) and the NO is clearly a different rite that came later. See Fr. Hesse "On the Validity of Novus Ordo Sacraments". To "schism" mean to cut yourself off from tradition, not to be cut off by changes. So the argument of schism applies more to the NO than the SSPX. It is quite ironic to be accused of being in schism by people who are technically themselves attending a schismatic rite (being cut off from any tradition - they aren't schismatics, but the rite is). Levfebre always condemned the New Mass, because attending it means that you silently accept the Vatican II teachings on religious freedom, etc. The SSPX obviously recommends against it similar to how they treat Orthodox Masses. In the end, most people just fear being "too radical", so they rather attend FSSP, diocesan TLM or a conservative NO. Even the FSSP accepts heretical VII documents as truth and can't criticize Francis out of fear of losing their nice cathedrals. Problem is that that's just fear tactics and legalese and I think God cares more about not following heresy than not following hierarchy.

[@fschutt247]

EDIT: okay so I researched this question more and I have to revise my previous comment: yes, it is a sin, even showing approval, indifference, seeing it as an "alternative option", etc. Lefevbre was always against it, adhering to Quo Primum. No compromise with modernists, give them a finger and they'll take the entire arm. Even the SSPX is slowly tending to be more liberal after the 2012 split (with the SSPX-MC). You truly have to be on guard these days, no generation has had it this bad.

[@DJScootagroov]

Go to the FSSP. THE SSPX has never been given formal permission to conduct the mass.

[@flyingcamry]

6:06 ...The way you talk about the Novus Ordo mass in some of your videos could be mistaken for some of those tactics the enemies of God use on the Church as a whole. I love some of your content, especially the video on the falsehood of putting faith in elections, but instead of building the church as a whole it feels like you spend a lot of time trying to "own" all of the NO Catholics because some haters talk bad about tradition.

[@lydiaspencer3192]

Seems I’ve read there a problem with sex abuse in the SSPX.

[@BorisMarques14.88]

Where?

[@dr.parakletos7765]

For the full objective story, based on verified facts, see today's (4/19/24) IPeter5 Daily Digest.

[@RickW-HGWT]

There is as in any organization, it is worse when it is from the church, as the laity we need to be rapid in protecting our children and faith, we the laity pay for these evils. As an aside the justice department is going to pay 100 million for the failure of the fbi in the nassar abuse case , it is sad that children are taken advantage of by so many organizations. I have a special venom for the clergy and the apologists in this evil.

[@benevenuto9794]

are trad priest “worse” than ordinary priest…. the answer is yes they are. “ordinary priests” are obedient.. disobedience if the calling card of satan.

[@Thefloridarepublic]

The pope would say, go to a lutheran service to fulfill your obligation.

[@RickW-HGWT]

Look at his statue and stamp honoring Luther, this past January he hosted Anglicans at St. Peter's, and gave a pep talk to expletive communists in the Vatican, so your not wrong.

[@benevenuto9794]

@@RickW-HGWT please include posting this is a lie of detraction toward the roman pontiff.

[@benevenuto9794]

@@RickW-HGWT glad you are able to read hearts and intention. this again is a serious since of presumption against the roman pontiff