Can OpenAI Sora Solve 3D Modeling? I Tried This...

[@TechCindy]

Text version available here: tiancaixinxin.medium.com/can-openai-sora-solve-3d-modeling-i-tried-this-47c1576a4e8d Mentioned works: [NeRF] kzbin.info/www/bejne/gKaraGx7bdeXgcU [COLMAP] github.com/colmap/colmap [SceneDreamer] scene-dreamer.github.io

[@Rolandfart]

I think that openAI could easily create a model specifically for text to 3D by applying what they know about Sora. Sora clearly is able to create 3D scenes, all that needs to change is the output method.

[@TechCindy]

Yup, we'll see :)

[@cosmicfissure924]

Excelente video Maestra, buen día.

[@TechCindy]

¡Gracias!

[@ScarletEternity-m2r]

This is crazy we could have games that build themselves in the future Like imagin playing gta and driving to another state and it just generates the world on the fly

[@TechCindy]

Love that you mentioned gta! I was thinking the other day, if there will be more games in a unlimited space in a realistic art style because of AI.

[@parallaxoldchannel]

"Can OpenAI Sora solve the problem of text to 3D?" It's not a problem, it's an industry with REAL artists that create 3D Models. We don't need anything "solving" our jobs. The only moment in which it becomes a "problem" that needs "solving" is when people who don't want to work want to produce. So, they don't want to invest time on learning how to 3D Model or developing 3D Models or art for that matter. They see it as something in the way of fulfilling their instant gratifications and thus think of it as a "problem" that needs "solving".

[@TechCindy]

My other video talks about why I think AI can't replace 3D artists. However I think my word choice here is overall appropriate. Is 1+1 a math problem? Yes. Do we have problem with it? No.

[@parallaxoldchannel]

@@TechCindy 1+1 is an equation, a formula with means to an end. If we are looking at the void of a viewport in any 3d software package as a "problem" then the solution is the 3D Modeler aka 3D Artist. The work involved is not a problem that needs solving. It's an equation with means to an end. What you are theorizing is an alternative workflow.

[@xitcix8360]

Think of where it will be in the future. AI will be better than humans at making videos. We will have simulations of the world that we can interact with. Imagine how incredible music and movies will be when they're 2X better than humans. Plus, movies and shows are controlled by greedy shareholders, this would give everyone the ability to make anything without restrictions from corporate greed

[@parallaxoldchannel]

@@xitcix8360 Having ambition, drive and the will to learn and create exists without "corporate greed".

[@parallaxoldchannel]

@@xitcix8360 By your logic, your life up until the implementation of current AI...has been 2x less enjoyable.