This is a great question coupled with a great response. I think you correctly identify the cognitive dissonance inherent in loving animals while eating them. It’s interesting to draw arbitrary lines between species, expressing horror at potentially eating dog meat while continuing to consume chicken. It makes sense though because speciesist attitudes are deeply ingrained in western culture, in which some animals are deemed worthy of moral consideration while others are objectified as food. I appreciate your honesty and your admission to continuing to consume meat primarily because it’s “delicious” and convenient, despite acknowledging the ethical issues. This prioritization of personal pleasure over recognized ethical concerns is a common barrier. I do think you mischaracterize vegan motivations. Your response assumes that people asking such questions are being judgmental or trying to “trap” others. This mischaracterizes many vegans’ genuine concern for animals and desire for ethical dialogue. You also suggest that questioning the ethics of eating animals is inherently antagonistic. This creates a false dichotomy between “militant” veganism and complacency, ignoring the possibility of respectful, nuanced dialogue. Don’t misunderstand me though, I think this video is rife with positive aspects and great self awareness. You acknowledge abstaining from meat is ethically superior, you recognize the problematic nature of animal ag, even done with apparent care for animal welfare, and admit that if personally required to kill animals for food you wouldn’t do it. I think your response is profound and I really appreciate you taking the time to think about this and share it with the community. I think love, in its truest sense, involves respect for the autonomy and well-being of the loved one, a desire to protect from harm, and valuing the other’s interests and life. Our physiological conflict arises from holding two beliefs/values, in this case: valuing animal life and well-being, and participating in a system that commodifies and ends animal lives for pleasure. I think all animals capable of suffering deserve equal moral consideration. Even at its most humane, animal ag involves separation of mothers and offspring, confined living conditions, and premature death, which are incompatible with any meaningful definition of love. In most developed countries nutritionally adequate plant-based alternatives are readily available, choosing to eat animals despite having other options demonstrates that taste preference is being prioritized over animal welfare. I also think true love is demonstrated through actions, not just feelings. Actively participating in a system that exploits and kills them contradicts any claim of love. If we consider history, humanity has gradually expanded its circle of moral consideration. Just as we’ve recognized the rights of various human groups over time, extending our compassion to animals is a natural ethical progression. Thanks for inspiring these thoughts with your video ❤.
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
Thank you for this really thoughtful comment.
@irakalina95024 ай бұрын
Hi Noah, I think what you thought was dog meat was the burger we both had in China. If that happened in Cuba then it was two places on your travels where the burger was not beef. I, too, was traumatized by the taste and texture of that thing. I think that question was a great one.
@SueCarole4 ай бұрын
Good question. And an even better answer. Please leave the tree leaning over the wall. It and the branch are perfectly positioned.
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
Thank you. Yeah. I probably will!
@BudParr4 ай бұрын
There's a wonderful (for fans of his) documentary about John Berger called Four Seasons in Quincy that for some reason interjects a section on this topic. I recall a family in the French countryside who had a deep relationship with the land and their animals, yet had no problem killing them for food. I think the question suggests false dichotomy. I think the real question is, instead, "Can you love and eat animals who have suffered through factory farming." I think not, even though that's difficult to do on a day-to-day basis. Michael Pollen's The Omnivore's Dilemma was a game changer for me in that regard.
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
I've read almost all of Pollen's books except for that one. I am putting it on the list.
@PlGGS4 ай бұрын
Definitely part of why I stopped eating meat
@deanpeterson_4 ай бұрын
Same.
@c-mon.re-arte4 ай бұрын
It ‘s really cool to see how the fog changes and the light change..I commented before pretty cool!! you are talking your mind out in one of your photo set, if you play with the timeline back and forth you can see the changes so cool, the photo is different every second
@teorec4 ай бұрын
I get that it's annoying, but I don't think it's wrong for someone to bring these things up. They're trying to make the world a better place, and the ugly truth is we really are part of the problem, and part of what they have to fight if they want to see real change in the world. It's uncomfortable, but it makes sense.
@CraigEmpson3 ай бұрын
...Peter from Germany would have known 😄 I do love animals , but I love eating them even more, of course animals we class as pets are off limits.
@maximoformanek4 ай бұрын
Nature is wild...
@edwardrow4 ай бұрын
title is sending me and I haven’t even watched the video yet
@edwardrow4 ай бұрын
watched the video, still sent, excellent experience 11/100
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@timtrautmann4 ай бұрын
I’m going to integrate this weather station with my home kit stuff. You think I can make it work? 15:42
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
Someone told me that it doesn’t work with HomeKit. I don’t know since I could never figure out how HomeKit works. I do know there are numerous weather stations that are HomeKit compatible.
@timtrautmann4 ай бұрын
@@NoahKalina I’ll let you know how it goes. I have plenty of time to hack on things these days.
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
definitely let me know.
@jonwaltermoceyhanton4 ай бұрын
i believe in you noah i believe you can go full vegan i believe you have the fortitude make it happen dude
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
When vegans consider farm raised eggs vegan (which they should) I will consider it!
@jaycarlson62914 ай бұрын
@@NoahKalina Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. If the chickens don't mind you eating their eggs, I say don't let it stop you. You'll be 90% vegan, saving much animal life, the climate, and your health!
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
@@jaycarlson6291 I think the health aspects of going vegan/vegetarian are dubious but if you find that you feel healthier that's great!
@jaycarlson62914 ай бұрын
@@NoahKalina For some people perhaps! BUT, the protective effects can pay out in spades as you age. AND, eating a whole food vegan diet has been PROVEN to prevent and reverse heart disease and many cancers. It's really a big deal.
@lmnk4 ай бұрын
Yes.
@jonathanmarks_photography4 ай бұрын
chickens are murderous eaters themselves, aren’t they? does that mean we can, as humans, be just as murderous? that is what I wonder. cows don’t, however, have the same murderous eating habits…unless you think grass has some sort of sentience…so eating them feels worse some how. such a heavy philosophical quandary. your thoughts are good.
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
Yeah. Lots of animals are brutal about what they eat. I guess we as empathetic humans should be held to a higher standard.
@samkingco4 ай бұрын
haven't watched the vid yet but the answer is no
@theguy35994 ай бұрын
First
@yayamusic5584 ай бұрын
I love animals as much as i love eating animals
@travisalexphoto4 ай бұрын
The caller is most likely posing you a vegan versus carnivore question. It's usually a common talking point amongst vegans, that ultimately, to eat meat, means you don't truly love nature or animals. If you truly love it, the only true path to them is going vegan. I respectfully disagree, I find that the majority of vegans are urbanites, who have not spent time with actual animals and nature And understanding ecom systems, or what it even means to live in a non-urban center to have access to food so privileged, enough to be to make that distinction, and most people who are more Progressive and conservationalism, as well as nature preservation, are those who are hunters, fisherman, and wild gamesman. There's no group of people that cares more about the conservation, protection, and well-being of nature and animals. Then people actually actively hunt them Because they want to be able to have those resources available for the next generation and their children's children. Just my two cents, but, I can't fully infer what they're asking either, so depending on what they're really trying to ask, I could should be talking on my ass.
@NoahKalina4 ай бұрын
This is a good comment. I think you are correct about a lot of these things.