Can you win this endgame position as White?

[@pramodvora2067]

Brillianr as usual.Find your approach to solving very logical and fascinating! Thanks again.

[@YourAverageChessPlayer]

My pleasure!

[@charlescichowski7554]

Nice work ! I love these end game Ideas that you present. You break them down into an easy to understand way. Keep up the good work. Thank you so much

[@YourAverageChessPlayer]

Glad you like them!

[@drziggyabdelmalak1439]

I'd never think I could win that! Thanks for that!

[@leefields3658]

Very good!

[@YourAverageChessPlayer]

Glad you like it!

[@petersiegfriedkrug]

Why didn't you give the name of the chess composer of this chess study? That is the right thing to do, even if he is already deceased on 21.12.2022. After all, a painting is not published anywhere without naming the author. That is unfair. I believe that this study comes from a Dutch chess composer in 1969. I believe by the well-known Gijsbert Jan (Gijs) van Breukelen. Because he published exactly this starting position. I am a chess study composer and it is logical that I know thousands and thousands of chess studies by heart and also the composer´s name of this chess studies as well! - Apart from that, this chess study from 1969 has often been published on the Internet.

[@YourAverageChessPlayer]

Sir, the composer name is not mentioned in the book I am reading this from. I don't know if there is an easy way to find a composer of studies like this, if there is I would happily add the composer name. I did manage to add composer names in other videos where it was readily mentioned.

[@drziggyabdelmalak1439]

Why are you so bloody arrogant!

[@MrSyntheticSmile]

@@drziggyabdelmalak1439He has a valid point: if a the name of the composer’s name is known it should be mentioned. In this case it is ok, though, because the uploader now explains that he didn’t know the name.

[@gajendrabasavaraju]

the same position with black to play its draw.