It's actually sad that this was not up an running over 10 years ago. Canada is always so slow to get it's act together.
@cdpond3 ай бұрын
You can thank your current federal government for those delays. If the Liberals had been supportive rather than introducing barrier after barrier, both the construction costs and the commissioning date could have been far less and far sooner. As your taxes increase, you can thank Sockboy and his team for all of this boondoggle.
@allannantes85833 ай бұрын
We should have three more of these projects approved and fast tracked. Can’t wait for a change of government in Canada so we can get the world to switch from coal to natural gas thus making a real change in green house gas emissions.
@IMGreg..3 ай бұрын
@cdpond Sure, but not the previous one. Small-minded much. We've had the same problem with oil. 3rd largest reserves, but we, for decades chose to ship it all south. Now Alberta is crying because the US, BC, and QC won't allow pipelines through their territory so there is limited chance to take advantage of high prices. Late, preceeded this government by 30 to 40 years
@IMGreg..3 ай бұрын
@@allannantes8583You may have missed the part about it being private the only government that may have held it up would be the BC government, unless it falls on tribal of federal land.
@dannymcnamara25543 ай бұрын
Liberal socialist policies holding back our potential!!
@john_doe_not_foundКүн бұрын
Canada needs 10 more of these, and more on the East Coast to service Europe. Canada is always so slow to act, because environmental assessments and bureaucracy crush Canadian entrepreneurialism and private investment.
@kenenns1943 ай бұрын
It should have been started 20 years ago.
@SuperReznative13 сағат бұрын
politicians are members working for World Economic Forum, to destroy the countrie's economy.Which is working for the U.N.for dominance world wide to depopulate , and make slaves out of the rest of the peasants.
@dereksmith50193 ай бұрын
The first plant in Kitimat is nearly finished . The second plant at WoodFibre Howe Sound is just starting , and the pipe line to feed the plant is also under construction .
@louisg23906 күн бұрын
And WHY does the China produce this processing plant and NOT CANADA ????????????????
@dezshane864 күн бұрын
As a Canadian I think it is a great idea Europe can be a great market now that Russia is out
@mitchellmitchell52682 күн бұрын
This long is almost all going to Asia . A bit to italy
@moehunter7 күн бұрын
LNG CANADA Kitimat's facility is a joint venture between Chevron & Australia's Woodside Energy. As of September 12, 2024 the project is 95% complete & is on track to deliver its first cargo of LNG by July 2025.
@donfitzsimons55324 ай бұрын
Kitimat had a plant that used that BC natural gas to produce an environmentally benevolent fuel METHANOL. Short sighted stupidity led to the closing of that plant and its subsequent disassembly and sale to China. Kitimat was a very important place for me and 150 of my colleagues. Watch out for corporate greed and stupidity. I will keep my fingers crossed.
@Maudit_Anglais3 ай бұрын
I an not hopeful.......
@davelewis94399 күн бұрын
Yes, our government is soo much better at developing natural gas than any private company. You would almost think trudy has an agreement with putin to crush our industry
@Global_MegaProjects4 ай бұрын
Canada can export natural gas to Asian countries, and it will take another 50 years before hydrogen and solar energy can fully replace this energy source.
@grahamkearnon66823 ай бұрын
BS, 29 yrs tops for China to go total renewable, already the coal power station permits are sitting unused.
@Shirley-v3g3 ай бұрын
50 years to put hydrogen up and running ? - who’s your source ? - I’m sure this issue was examined - before plunking down $40 billion CAD in investment dollars… / it takes natural gas to produce hydrogen - making this choice much more costlier and complex - rather then sticking with natural gas…
@SPLITSLEEVE3 ай бұрын
No, they will go with Russia or Iran
@jabom993 ай бұрын
@@Shirley-v3g Solar has been around for over 50 yrs and has proven to be a complete failure.
@happycamper34552 күн бұрын
@@jabom99 Solar and Wind can never work in Canada .. Nuclear power is the only way to go.
@jamesholt59633 ай бұрын
You can't make fertilizer, plastics and other synthetics out of wind.
@ronlagace73479 күн бұрын
It’s about time that we start taking control of our energy resources. 🇨🇦
@agaragar212 күн бұрын
Hot enough for you yet.....Grow a Brain !
@RLee-zs1ds5 сағат бұрын
Agreed 100%, We need at least one oil refinery ($10 billion) to refine Alberta's oil, so it can be sold to who ever is offering the best price. Another refinery on the East coast with pipelines across the country, so as to increase trade between provinces, plus a integrate energy line for electricty across the whole country. . Ideally the government should finance the oil refinery and bring a steady cash flow into government coffers.
@garyconners4663 ай бұрын
Seeing the list of companies building this project. Not one canadian company involved, this is another Canadian sell out.
@jigyjigy27493 ай бұрын
@@garyconners466 Even the pkant modules are build in China, so many STUPID people in the government and companies.
@MrBOOM5463 ай бұрын
Maybe look at the list of contractors?
@jabom993 ай бұрын
@@MrBOOM546 Yes of course the contractors on the ground, but so what.
@nolansacket34573 ай бұрын
Canadian companies have Trudeau's boot on their neck with the people egging him on. Investors here are punished. Trudy's new capital gain tax on 66% of your hard earned gains is just another kick in the nuts to Canadians.
@gragor11Ай бұрын
FIPA baby, FIPA. Now which government brought us that sellout?
@joeharvie83626 күн бұрын
I heard we need 10 of these to feed the world!
@paulbadics35003 ай бұрын
If it wasnt for trudeau this facility & several others would be up & running already on both coasts
@IMGreg..3 ай бұрын
Private investment moves at their own pace.
@JollyOldCanuck3 ай бұрын
No pipelines would have reached the east coast, the Quebec public are very resistant to any new pipelines being built.
@paulbadics35003 ай бұрын
@@JollyOldCanuckyes but they have no "resistance" to receiving "equalization payments" from the oil & gas revenue that Alberta has to send them & they are ok with tankers bringing in Saudi oil
@mat37143 ай бұрын
@@paulbadics3500So where's Trudeau in this shocking development of other provinces saying no ? My guess....it's in your head.
@paulbadics35003 ай бұрын
@@mat3714your not making sense..trudeau, ndp, quebec & others have opposed pipelines to provide energy to more canadians & to export to the world
@fedorbutochnikow53124 ай бұрын
Canada can export it for at least 50 years considering the fact that coal is still needed and when phased out, natural gas would be left as the only transitionary alternative.
@djb-w8m3 ай бұрын
they can sell it to Europe , duh
@gragor11Ай бұрын
" Canada can export it for at least 50 years . . ." That's pretty optimistic considering the volume of commodities used to produce the compressed fracked gas feed stock and power to run the trains. Ground water for fracking, sand for proppant. Did I say water, as in water in the Peace River basin for hydro power generation in times of decreasing snow fall and precipitation levels? Commodities consumed for constant building of well infrastructure and feeder pipelines all the way to the Yukon border. This is an industry that consumes for foreign profit. It will be interesting to see what energy process is dominant it in 2075. What I do know is that I won't be here to see it. Will it be the aftermath of rigid Extinction Rebellion dogma or the aftermath of heavy construction Industry having free rein due to rulings of Dispute Resolution Tribunals in FIPAs.
@agaragar212 күн бұрын
You can produce all the energy you need thru wind and solar and battery .....that's why Alberta BANNED Renewable Energy Plants.....you know cause they're a source of Visual Pollution ! The cheapest energy production is SOLAR !!!!!
@agaragar212 күн бұрын
@@gragor11 .........Thankyou for your LOGIC..........not sure why these guys can't see past they're noses out here, probably because theyve been indoctrinated by the Fossil Fuel industry SOLAR NOW !
@User-p7q7d6 сағат бұрын
Coal will never be phased out with all the wind and solar around. There's nothing else they can turn on and off to meet variability like that. It's the only way to fill the many gaps.
@lloydjoseph92123 ай бұрын
Go Canada. SKB Massive
@BobLavoie-o3b8 күн бұрын
Make LNG in Newfoundland also two if possible on each coast whatever the cost is and tell Quebec to get ther act in gear with there oil companies to start drilling
@enriquearana20637 күн бұрын
It’s never too late
@tessietesoro74079 сағат бұрын
Canada will survive the tariff , the recession , not to worry, God is helping us Canadians. I pray for Canada everyday together with rest of church parishioners
@pekkatanninen289811 күн бұрын
Go for it. Nothing gained if not pursued to completion.😊
@rickschlosser67933 ай бұрын
This isn’t a $30 billion dollar facility. It is an $18 billion dollar facility. The other $12 billion is for drilling and facilities in NEBC. Then there was the money for CGL (which doesn’t start in Dawson Creek, it starts in Groundbirch) which is on top of that $30 billion.
@coreybacklun68463 ай бұрын
I worked at ground birch for the pipeline construction.
@fiddyscenttupacksaday33086 күн бұрын
Cost overruns have pushed this well above $40 billion. FLOUR woke construction policies!
@RLee-zs1ds4 сағат бұрын
Quebec should be the hyrodrogen capital of the world, considering Quebec has an abundance of water and electricity it can use electrolysis. Hydro-Québec’s generating fleet comprises 61 hydroelectric generating stations and 24 thermal plants with a total installed capacity of 37.2 GW. Its hydropower facilities also include 28 large reservoirs with a combined storage capacity of over 176 TWh, as well as 681 dams and 91 control structures.
@grahamkearnon66823 ай бұрын
I can guarantee this video maker hadn't been 1000 kms near to the plant, every 'fact' is vauge!
@darrenmarchand69913 ай бұрын
How are you going to guarantee that butthead your very vague shut up
@RebelWithACause-ts7deКүн бұрын
If the project sponsors of LNG Canada had assessed the energy landscape in 2021 instead of 2018, the changing landscape would have weighed much more heavily on their decisions.
@cdpond3 ай бұрын
The biggest challenge was being knee-capped at every turn by the Trudeau Liberal government. This project began a decade ago. It's certainly not the largest private sector investment in Canada (that record is held by the oilsands development in Northern Alberta)... but it is the largest single private investor project. If not for the Liberal government's hampering efforts, it would have been completed already. But to understand the true environmental benefit of this endeavour requires people to look beyond their own feet... much of the world needs cleaner sources of fuel, and LNG is a significantly better option than the use of coal. Therefore we, as Canadians, will help reduce global emissions by offsetting the use of coal. This video speaks to that, but unfortunately the creators of the video aren't as well versed in the global demands and ease of conversion from coal fired to LNG units. And the usual video segments showing cooling towers and plumes of steam... which the econutz seem to believe is some sort of chemical or petro emissions. Nope. Steam. Like you get from your tea kettle when you make your tea.
@brianschryver83143 ай бұрын
Funny thing is, while we were giving in to clowns protesting, the Americans set up several projects and got a big leg up on us in the market. Then we found out Canadian protesters were being funded by American interests. It all makes sense when you follow the money.
@gragor11Ай бұрын
You missed the ravages of fracking. Systematic blindness is the forte of all for and agin this project.
@agaragar212 күн бұрын
Our emission are GROWING !.....and the sale and use of Natural Gas will only accelerate and intensify climate change!........ From google: the Production and use of Natural Gas produces less CO2 by 30 % than Oil Here's the clincher, that proves how poor your thinking skills are : However, the extraction, transportation, and storage of natural gas can lead to significant methane emissions. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that's 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. Methane is 84 ties more potent a greenhouse Gas than CO2 (so in percent terms 8400 % better than CO2 at creating a GREENHOUSE around the earth) Stop with the straw-man arguments.......burning Fossil Fuels produces (liberates ) CO2 gas ....massive amounts So what happens when you kids or grand kids die walking to school?......that's happening in other parts of the world......wake up ! Fossil Fuels are accelerating climate change , at an accelerating rate......you can't live at higher than 600 ppm of CO2 gas in the atmosphere......were going to hit 500 ppm in 2 years ! CO2 levels haven't been this high since the last 150,000 years. and even then they take thousands of years to slowly go up then down.....on the chart we are going up vertically with ppm of CO2, its insane But your probably right, Cause your know Liberals lack common sense !.............buddy we look like certified geniuses compared to you ! Do your own research on independent truthful websites !
@michaelhenault144416 сағат бұрын
Advanced batteries will change the nature of the game for all the competitors mentioned.
@stevekraft42413 ай бұрын
Is this the facility that Trudeau gave the steel contract to Chinese steel firms?
@nolansacket34573 ай бұрын
Trudeau has nothing to do with that. The oil and gas companies contracted prefab sections to China. Why? Because they produce over 50% of the world's steel and got the job done. Canadians would still be bickering.
@PollyHowarth-u5y2 күн бұрын
I hope the Kiticatt projects succeeds although I think they started the project 25 years too late.
@joshliu477413 сағат бұрын
Help other countries to use the clean fossil energy is more efficient to reduce the global warming.
@johnwinner85113 күн бұрын
How much would AB oil /gas,diesel plant cost. It would appear the market wants refined oil ???
@stevendblois692 күн бұрын
Apparently, squamish and prince rupert are startng up on lng builds.
@ardennielsen37613 ай бұрын
they have a hydro power dam used to make seasonal power, not burning gas to make LNG. and their is a lot more then CO2 in raw natural gas, some has traces of things like H2S or even Hydrogen as a radio decay product of Radon in relation to some quantification.
@richardgadoury84523 ай бұрын
It is being commissioned as we speak.....not 10 years..
@mrMacGooverКүн бұрын
Modules manufactured in China...that's big reason for concern.
@tomprovan508 күн бұрын
natural gas if the cleanest fuel you can get
@SanchezKirby3 ай бұрын
Right on
@airborne_12v3 ай бұрын
Still waiting here in Fort Nelson BC time for our gas to get to market
@adityagajjar31183 ай бұрын
Who are potential export customers ?
@jackbal76232 күн бұрын
The worlds energy use increases 10% per year. There is infinite demand in Asia. Kitimat has an advantage due to geography. Higher latitude means less loss of gas in transit compared to the gulf and also a shorter distance to Asia. The market is Asia not Europe.
@dannyboy21804 ай бұрын
Australia has 5 x $30+ billion dollar LNG plants
@dukezap14 ай бұрын
But lacks the Oil reserves
@fredflinstone86284 ай бұрын
But Canada has lacks Kangaroos, which is as relevant as heavy oil reserves when discussing LNG. Moreover, high cost of production heavy oil will be impacted earlier in the transition to renewables.
@Global_MegaProjects4 ай бұрын
woww
@brianschryver83143 ай бұрын
Canada is so far behind in the game, it’s pretty tragic when you break it down. Holding LNG back really doesn’t benefit much, it just encourages other countries to use more coal.
@mackendw3 ай бұрын
isn't this against sparkle socks carbon pollution stance?
@fredflinstone86284 ай бұрын
It's 14 million tonnes annually, which is a very small amount of worldwide exports. Yes it is still important but it isn't making Canada into a major LNG player. The problem is LNG is mostly a west coast supply location meaning sales to Asia after a long transportation route via the pacific ocean. Canada cannot compete against the US in shipping to Europe because the US gulf coast is always going to be a cheaper transportation route. This is further exacerbated by the large supply that has come on line in the US and the many more plants that are planned/in-progress in the US...whereas after this plant Canada has 3 small plants that have a combined throughput of 9 million tonnes that could actually be built and another one of 12 million tonnes. For comparison 2023 US exports approx 89 million tonnes. US projects approved approx 100 million tonnes. Canadian 2023 exports zero. LNG Canada plus the 4 other approved projects are 14 million +9 million ( 3 small) + 12 million= 35 million tonnes annually. Conclusion: 189 million > 35 million, therefore Canada does not have a plan to adequately compete with the US let alone dominate Global energy.
@jabom994 ай бұрын
Well put. Canada is always slow off the mark. When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, Obama signed a presidential order to fastrack LNG development in the gulf for Europe. Australia had LNG going many years ago. I am not sure if you are right about cheaper transportation to Europe from the Gulf coast though. Kitimat is actually quite close to Asia. Anyway, the incredibly long process of getting any approvals for development in Canada always leaves us in the dust.
@dixonpinfold25823 ай бұрын
@@jabom99 Following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Germany and Japan begged Canada to make long-term LNG supply commitments. PM Peter Pan turned them away without a millisecond's hesitation, falsely claiming that there's no business case for such arrangements.
@jabom993 ай бұрын
@@dixonpinfold2582 There were plans to pipeline natural gas accross the country. Quebec vetoed this and said NO, you cannot build that pipeline to the east coast. We all know that in this country QUEBEC runs the show.
@dixonpinfold25823 ай бұрын
@@jabom99 Going to Germany from the gas fields, Quebec is on the way. It's not on the way to Japan or anywhere else in Asia, e.g. South Korea, Taiwan.
@jabom993 ай бұрын
@@dixonpinfold2582 ok, duh.
@offgridwanabe3 ай бұрын
In 50 years it will look like all the abandoned mines BC already has some including whole towns.
@Brian.Martin3 күн бұрын
Not too late..other sources still 30yeaes away
@sandipaulson84754 ай бұрын
Who are the major investors??
@dixonpinfold25823 ай бұрын
It's 2024. Use a search engine. If you don't know how, ask your mom and dad.
@MarkPrice-gs9xh3 ай бұрын
Lol @@dixonpinfold2582
@andrewward42462 ай бұрын
its not going to be operational in a few years, I think they announce first shipments by Q1 2025
@sandorvarga74376 күн бұрын
.10.billion/dollar
@ricosuave65039 күн бұрын
We build 1 pipeline , Australia 3, America 10. Which one is the looser? Pipelines east should be our priority for our allies.
@darrenmarchand69913 ай бұрын
Great video!
@dixonpinfold25823 ай бұрын
This project is by world standards distinctly medium-sized. There's no grounds for claiming it's important to global LNG markets.
@arniewilliamson17675 күн бұрын
Long is important as we move away from ev vehicles to hydrogen ones.
@buckybucky85964 ай бұрын
Except we're not in the middle of an energy crisis.
@modero63703 ай бұрын
With current anti-fossil fuel initiatives allover the West, we will be in an energy crisis in no time. Here in Alberta this summer we already came very close to a provincial black out.
@buckybucky85963 ай бұрын
@@modero6370 But, 'we will be in an energy crisis in no time' ≠ 'we're in the middle of an energy crisis'
@brianschryver83143 ай бұрын
We’re in an idiot crisis. And a corruption crisis. Pretty much a clown show
@redman59453 күн бұрын
Ya but one contract could last a long time. That is the problem building it in China while people and Canada need these jobs.
@mikemcfarthing34994 күн бұрын
Fast yrack this!
@PeteSammarco-k6s7 күн бұрын
BC energy plan is good 😊
@alancadieux29844 ай бұрын
Wind and solar have already proven what failures they are, no competition for LNG there, hydrogen has potential, but isn't developed enough, this venture will be successful. Those mentioned doing this already are ahead of Canada 🇨🇦, including also Brazil, so there is the competition.
@jamesnasmith9844 ай бұрын
Funny idea of failure. What do you call an unliveable planet? Some like it hot.
@alancadieux29844 ай бұрын
@@jamesnasmith984 history has proven that economics will dictate what proceeds, LNG will. Wind is by far the most environmentally unfriendly violator, a fact much effort has been expended to cover up. Innovations in solar are moving ahead and the older stuff will result in a massive pile of unwanted garbage yet. No doubt big oil has bought off some things and mothballed them to prevent any competition. There will be some improvements yet that could prove helpful, it's just the morons like Trudeau pushing the wef green agenda worldwide in 2 years that are unrealistically annoying.
@jabom994 ай бұрын
@@jamesnasmith984 Yes failure. Solar and wind have been around for decades. If they were so awesome they would be dominating power production, they they have failed even with ridiculous government subsidies. At least attempt to think objectively and logically.
@tokertalk96483 ай бұрын
@@jamesnasmith984 ROFL you're one of those climate hoaxers. Grow up child and stop believing in fairy tales. You are embarassing yourself little one!
@wally61933 ай бұрын
@@jamesnasmith984 what? braindead?
@jigyjigy27494 ай бұрын
Canada can sell natural gas to Asian countries and we need another 50 years before hydrogen and solar replaces this energy use.
@agaragar212 күн бұрын
thanks BOT !
@rosecomeau-v4x3 ай бұрын
Who is paying for this? Tax dollars to send energy to Asia. Why is there no Canadian gas going to the East Coast?
@dixonpinfold25823 ай бұрын
For one thing, Quebec's refusal.
@paulbadics35003 ай бұрын
Quebec claims they dont need it..get it from mideast
@tara66643 ай бұрын
Your carbon tax dollars to help reduce a carbon foot print LOL what a pile of
@airborne_12v3 ай бұрын
Irving owns the east coast
@lisamarie10508 күн бұрын
Newbrunswick @@airborne_12v
@adamhodgson88513 ай бұрын
Seems like a good idea to me…. But …What me know?
@johngamerschlag70013 ай бұрын
Maybe Canada doesn’t need to rush to dump their Natural Gas at cheap prices to foreign countries. What we be our future needs when we also need natural gas.Once again big corporations are going to reap the benefits of our resource
@kipcoulter26413 ай бұрын
Electricity prices are going to spike in the future as demand surges.
@TenthCrane27884 ай бұрын
95% completed
@TenthCrane27883 ай бұрын
@@chetcoyote89 "With the LNG Canada project now more than 95% complete overall, our CEO Jason Klein delivers our latest progress report"
@TenthCrane27883 ай бұрын
@@chetcoyote89 Lol Not sure how to use the internet?
@@chetcoyote89 You might not be in Kitimat The CEO Jason Klein gave a 2024 update
@jimmiller67133 ай бұрын
our emissios are the least of our problems 2024 hunting grounds in 2024 not really a concern go to the shopping market .
@darrenmarchand69913 ай бұрын
Thereis 4+lng facilities in Canada that are 30 billion operating
@Smalls9893 ай бұрын
now make a pipeline going to the east coast.
@jprej58363 ай бұрын
Fossil fuels is and will remain essential for all facets of our modern lifestyle. CO2 is essential for life on our planet.
@davidhick43033 ай бұрын
Why do I seem to be the only person that can’t stand these AI generated videos? They are so canned and useless just full of boring info spoken in a cyclical way taking 20 minutes to say what could have been said in 2 minutes.
@nolansacket34574 ай бұрын
I would like to thank all the fools who think the world will stop using hydrocarbons by 2035. No one alive today will see that end. There is no satisfactory technology to replace fossil fuels and definitely not the capital or resources to do so. Furthermore exploiting our energy resources would create capital to allocate towards green energy technology R&D. Canadians are oblivious to the fact that BC, AB and SK support the rest of the country...off energy production. Quebec alone costs the west 14 billion per year, so the west needs to crank production to deal with those leaches.
@albertaman63904 ай бұрын
fossil fuel.....?.....you think dead dino's and trees are responsible for oil......try a little logic........oceans of oil at thousands of feet below your feet/bedrock....you think it crawled down their and died.....?...carbon is rare as a gas,abundant in NATURE.........
@investguy464 ай бұрын
You had me until the Quebec thing. The fake info was drawn up by the National Post ten years ago and sadly, many western politicians still try and sell it to western constituents. Why? It causes division amongst us Canadians, it’s part of the UPC platform. It’s almost as fake as Quebec is going to separate. Oil prices world wide are tanking. Danielle Smith may have to rethink her speeches quickly. LNG growth, is a win for Canada.
@adityagajjar31183 ай бұрын
Who are potential export customers of the LNG produced ?
@albertaman63903 ай бұрын
@@adityagajjar3118 china,japan,asia,india
@nolansacket34573 ай бұрын
@@adityagajjar3118 From the east coast? Only all of Europe. German officials came over to ask Trudy to supply Europe nat gas. He flat out said no, there is no business case. The Netherlands definitely needs gas too. The LNG plant in Kitimat will be supplying nat gas to Asian markets at 4-5x what we get for it here.
@alex79suited3 ай бұрын
Canada is up for this business opportunity platform. Peace ✌️😎.
@PWlangford1Күн бұрын
Better late than never.
@silajoannie3 ай бұрын
Hopefully they(owns it.) don’t sell it…Watch Crispy Crème come along an buy it Ten years later?
@marvinstadnek74963 ай бұрын
As long as there’s cold weather there will always be need for lng
@brianschryver83143 ай бұрын
And we will always have cold weather, sounds like a safe bet.
@georgefirth45023 ай бұрын
Canada makes too many costly miscalculations.
@adamhodgson88513 ай бұрын
Canada made its most costly miscalculation on Nov 5th 2015 and we have been paying for it big time for almost 9 years now !!! 🤦♂ 🍁
@tyleroliver55713 ай бұрын
Why did China build the mods when we can build our own?
@dws59513 ай бұрын
Toured the Kitimat LNG site spring of 2024. Unbelievable in scope and complexity... Source ng from on the opposite side of the province...Fort St. John to the Douglas channel. An enormous undertaking
@dbennett47 күн бұрын
It's actually pretty rinky-dink compared to the oil sands. I was very underwhelmed when I saw it.
@peterparsons71413 ай бұрын
LNG Canada Development Inc. is an industrial joint venture established to construct a liquefied natural gas export terminal in Kitimat, British Columbia, Canada. The consortium is led by Shell and also includes Petronas, PetroChina, Mitsubishi, and Korea Gas. The world’s energy demands are growing, and that will continue for decades. More supply is needed. Hydrogen? Ahhhahahaha !
@secretagent863 ай бұрын
Boom. Lol. My father saw the Hindenberg fly over eastern canada once. We all know how that worked out
@garypike51304 ай бұрын
Very exied abut this whole system as it has many positives and is a great opportunity to feature Canadian expertise . This is far from the first ever system and negative poorly reasearshed videos like this are a real insult as opposed to a celebration.
@hockeyiscanada3 ай бұрын
I think this won't finalize because it crosses a indigenous land that was never giving up by treaties and has no moral or legal right doing as it has been refused by the indigenous of the territory just before Kitamat...
@stanmitchell337525 күн бұрын
Nukes can replace gas
@lukechan72323 ай бұрын
We in Calgary helped to design the first LNG project in 2012, before anyone did in Canada. Didn’t help Canada at all.
@loudlightning58693 ай бұрын
The only thing true about this is yes it’s for Asian markets and yes Canada doesn’t export to many countries other then the USA and they the project has ballooned in cost. The rest is BS.
@ValentineNina-v6g3 ай бұрын
Predovic Village
@VuNguyen-uc7xe3 ай бұрын
Libs will find a way to mess this up.
@BCBennyCAN23 ай бұрын
This December, first shit gets filled.
@PixieDust8-8-83 ай бұрын
What a horrible mess they are making to the beautiful landscape. It is so sad to see the beautiful mountains and forests in the distance and these hideous concrete stacks and razed forest floors like a disease on the environment. The fossil fuel dinosaur is on its way to extinction. If the US, Qatar, and Australia already have LNG set up, why were these billions not invested in renewables instead?
@freddiethompson583 ай бұрын
It will become obsolete by the time they built it! Siberian gas is much cheaper and closer to the Asian markets, and politically more reliable than Canada.
@Maudit_Anglais3 ай бұрын
BAD NEWS ! More polution !!!
@alainparent51654 ай бұрын
They don't want gaz in a new house and building after that built using gaz where is the joke exactly
@Helios39963 ай бұрын
There is a waste of 10 minutes of time I will not be getting back !
@LT-xo3dj3 ай бұрын
We need a new leader to help export this gas GO PC GO PC
@JPV-j8m3 ай бұрын
See you have to DRILL FOR LNG 🙄
@mtnphot3 ай бұрын
Did the maker just cobble video clips together? The subject is natural gas, however crude oil pumpjacks are part of the backdrop. The location is on the west coast yet there is footage from eastern north america. There is no discussion about the capacity of the project and how much gas is going to be required. I have heard estimates that this plant will use almost all the output of the gas fields leaving little for domestic supply. Another unspoken part is how that the gas is obtained by fracking which has huge environmental impacts on its own. Each well uses millions of gallons of water and chemicals that are poisoning water supplies and creating earthquakes. Who is going to clean up the mess when this is all done. Canada has sold itself to the lowest bidder.
@Nektaria110003 ай бұрын
In all probability the Major investor is China . China needs to ensure that its needs are not disrupted or blocked by US and NATO using sanctions , or have pipe lines blown up .A military blockade is not feasible as it involves direct confrontation. Alter Australia,s alignment with NATO, it no longer qualified as a reliable supplier. Canada does not always strictly follow US dictates because the politically the Citizens are more savvy and not easily influenced by propaganda. The political leaders dare not openly attempt to foist their personal preferences or sentiments on the Public . Under the circumstances it’s a good place to invest . The Citizens welcome Investors without any hidden or masked agenda .
@jackpeckford5 күн бұрын
This is why trump wants canada
@IMGreg..3 ай бұрын
Of course we're late we should be building green hydrogen plants to get ahead of the curve.
@Shirley-v3g3 ай бұрын
@@IMGreg.. - hydrogen at 3X the cost of natural gas ?
@brianschryver83143 ай бұрын
Hydrogen is still a question mark, storage is still a problem. While it’s a great energy source, dealing with the most reactive element we know is always going to present challenges.
@harrywood81963 күн бұрын
Whos funding it?
@gregorygray32833 ай бұрын
Owned built and managed by ccp
@andredurand17854 ай бұрын
🙂👍
@fusionlight5060Ай бұрын
Get the job down and build it as fast as possible. Forget all the Bullshit.
@bangun1723 ай бұрын
At least its not in alberta, they have too much power as it is