Canon 24-105mm f/4 | EF vs RF lenses

[@nes.torfernandez]

I had some high hopes about your video but your opinion is based on NDs but nothing about image quality, sharpness, AF performance, AF noise ( for video ) weight and balance for gimbal shooting. Anyone who is serious into video care about using NDs on matte box, screw on or in the back.

[@Tonic.Fusion]

Canon says that with EF on Mirrorless you are losing 3 axis of stabilization from the body..so, for video, I think RF is better choice.

[@nativesugarshack9328]

I chose the EF version for my R5 so that I can have ND behind the lens using the Canon adapter.

[@hardsayings2400]

Are you happy with your decision?

[@hardsayings2400]

Great comparison! I learned a lot.

[@максимт-ф5щ]

thanks for the video. can you tell me is there a noise of autofocus or stabilisation in rf or ef 24-105?

[@VideoGizmology]

Yes, there is noise with the EF, I think it's both IS and AF noise. There is no noise on the RF lens that I can hear.

[@максимт-ф5щ]

@@VideoGizmology thanks

[@nicolasmatu]

What would the photographic results of the rf version be like in one canon r50?

[@VideoGizmology]

It'll be solid. However, the advantage of the R50 is the compact size, so I would personally pair it with a compact lens. But if you don't mind a large lens, the RF 24-105mm is one of the better ones at f/4

[@dan323609]

Absolutely not the same. Rf better sharpness, better stabilizing, better quality, better size (without adapter), better weight (own + without adapter), control ring, absolutely silent and support optical + in body IS

[@jeremygray8272]

Which lens produced better photo results ?

[@VideoGizmology]

The RF 24-105mm produced better photos, but you can only use that lens on RF cameras.

[@FlatWaterFilms]

Got the Meike variable ND filter adapter for $160. Used on the 20-105 EF. Anyone who shoots video seriously knows ya got to have ND filters!

[@anaisjbeauty]

Excellent video!

Nice, thanks