Canon EF to RF Adapters / Which One is Best for You?

[@callmelil]

Your sound editing is great, every "click" sounds so smooth

[@DeputyNordburg]

As a sports photographer I shoot 90% of the time Manual with Auto ISO. There is not much I adjust frequently. I am a big fan of the basic adapter. I bought one each for my 3 big expensive lenses, and they just stay on 100% f the time. That seems a little overpriced, but I am not buying a new 400mm F2.8 for $13K.

[@nataliemcallister151]

Do you like shooting an RF body with your big EF lenses?

[@ballerunivers5232]

Thank you so much i’m a sports photographer aswell

[@iforchrist6528]

I have Canon m50 mark ii and i just bought 100-400mm rf lens...so what Adapter should I use?

[@madonna816]

@@iforchrist6528there isn’t one. Upgrade to R50.

[@cameronmeetze8153]

I’m so glad I pulled the trigger on the adapter. I’ve got an R6 and didn’t realize how expensive RF lenses were

[@alexcostafotografia]

Old video I know... but my time to upgrade is here so.... Todd... I have to say... amazing video... I was in a middle of gear buying rush... you just convinced me to buy the cheapest one lol... for anyone reading comments before watching the video.... that man knows his stuff and he has like several good points! Watch it to the end!

[@MartinLisius]

Very in-depth information about the EF-RF adapter. Thanks for posting, Todd.

[@user28495]

Really good point on the clear filter and the extra cost associated with that

[@SanyaJuutilainen]

One filter version positive missed is that for some bulbous low focal length objectives, this can actually be a cheaper option - going to EF lenses like some 15mm, 11mm, 8mm or even lower, it can be very hard to impossible to get a filter, and those that you can get are often more expensive than this adapter.

[@Stan_the_Belgian]

And the filter is very protected

[@MohondhaY]

I’m honestly really happy with using EF L glass on my Canon mirrorless body. I won’t be buying any RF L glass anytime soon, due to ridiculously higher prices. 😊

[@fledermausi2048]

is the adapter fast enough for you?

[@MohondhaY]

@@fledermausi2048 Yep, absolutely no issues.

[@colorist_tommy4247]

Love your Cons points. Shows you have thoroughly understood the product you are reviewing. Next EF-EOS R adapter to review would be Mieke Variable filter adapter, which for the price of a regular Canon adaptor gives you so much more...

[@cogs2937]

That drop in filter ring sounded so good until you listed the drawbacks. The extra money for the clear filter was bad but Not compatible with RF lenses was a deal breaker. Thanks for the great review. I'll be going with the basic model.

[@okaro6595]

Well shouldn't ne obvious that it is not compatible with RF lenses. You do not need an adapter with them.

[@sinon0959]

This honesty saves you so much money. I came from a older 700d model to the newer r6 mark 2 and don't make enough money from this to purchase the newer Rf lenses.

[@UP209D]

This gentleman has an underrated channel

[@rayb3000]

Lets not forget that the drop in filters add a barrier between your lens and the sensor to protect it from dust.

[@terrymorganphotography]

I'm at that stage of trading in some gear (EOS bodies and lenses(?) ) to go for a mirrorless Canon...probably R6 as the R5 is expensive and I'm not sure whether the £1500 price differential is justified. So, having found your video about EF to RF adapters is very timely and useful. So thank you.

[@PreInception]

Shocked at the low subs which I just subscribed! Must be a new channel. Great review and look forward to more reviews!

[@dominey]

Thanks Wayne. It’s hard starting from zero! :)

[@LukeZalvino]

Filter adapter sounds really useful except for when I go to put my rf lens on instead of ef

[@usfireman]

Thank you so much for the in depth comparison. A nice, simple breakdown that was very helpful.

[@izoyt]

canon actually did a good homework with this adapters, imo.

[@kylecallahan6756]

Great video. I'm looking at finally diving into the world of Canon mirrorless cameras (an upgrade from my 10-year old Canon Rebel). The basic adaptor seems to make the most sense for me. Excited about upgrading and learning all that the latest Canon cameras/lenses can do!

[@braintonique]

I was in the same boat, I went from 500D to R10, so far the camera is good, planning to get the adapter for my older lenses.

[@THRILLHOUSEV]

Great video. It shouldn't be a surprise that Canon wouldn't include the clear filter though; that just seems like a very Canon thing to do.

[@onnonugteren2935]

Very right buy first the adapter. And yes about the filter adapter: you are very right: hidden costs!

[@andymok7945]

Nuts. The adapter with the filter should include a blank insert at no charge.

[@patmcbride9853]

As handy as it may be to have a polarizer in place with any lens, I usually have one on the lens as a protective measure, which came in handy once when I dropped the camera.

[@CalvinWongg]

Just the get basic one will do. I have been using the basic adapter since day one, all good and works perfectly.

[@djaa7]

I was here for general info but mainly to see if there was other drop in filter options. Glad there is and should be even more now, 3 years later.

[@razvanpopescu5252]

Interesting the "new" control ring. For some of us remebering settimg everything on the lens with separate rings: shutter speed, aperture, white balance is basicaly like "back to the future" Thank you for the great review

[@m_sh_oh]

Hi! I found your channel through this video. I like your video style--calm, going through everything thoroughly step-by-step. Thanks!

[@MacOSTen]

Greetings from the (UK). Just come across your channel as looking at these RF adaptors. What a very informative video. Cheers. Subscribed. 👍

[@rayspencer5025]

The drop in filter would be very useful for my wide lenses that can't accept screw on filters due to bulbous front element.

[@Dstonephoto]

I wonder how smart of an idea it is to use a rear mounted polarizer n the optical path, as we’re potentially introducing additional reflections into the mix.

[@AndreyKrepkih]

Good day! I use an adapter with a ring, assigned a temperature change in Kelvin to this ring. I often shoot reports and there are very difficult conditions, when in one room there is a diode light, in another there are classic light bulbs. And customers are asked to quickly give JPG files for posting on social networks. Therefore, this ring is very convenient for me!

[@tunintunin3417]

Thanks man, I almost clicked the filtered version, after your input, I opted out.

[@elisabethlafontaine8979]

What a great video! Thank you for all this information, I’m about to get an R6 and would not have thought of adapters till I got to the store!

[@Bad_Wolf_Media]

I currently use the 7DII, with the two-dial controls, with the ISO controlled with a separate button to activate, so I don't know that I'd need the control ring. However, looking at the placement, I can see that being potentially useful, especially if you can reach/move it with a finger on the right hand wrapped around the grip. In my head, I can see that being a quick way to flip the shutter speed (my main starting point of adjustment when needed in the moment).

[@joshualaird5303]

$100 for the basic is pretty cheap to use while saving up for RF glass IMO and it works flawlessly... at least for me

[@abhijithshivaswamy7962]

You mean, there is no compatibility or quality issues when compared to directly using a RF lens?

[@joshualaird5303]

@@abhijithshivaswamy7962 I haven't used an RF lens yet but I know my 16-35 (and my other lenses) works perfect with the adapter and the focusing is worlds better with the R6. No issues at all

[@pofrani]

Thank you. I needed to know exactly what these adapters are for as I'm planning on finally upgrading from my 5D 4 to an R3 but I'm keeping my EF lenses for a while

[@mrmosk2011]

I am glad you pointed out the lack of a clear filter. That's is a big miss for Canon. I think they should at least sell a cover for a much lower price.

[@esoxhu]

Exactly. Why do we need any extra filter (clear filter) if we don't need any filter. Only a cover should be attached.

[@nikoonikoo]

I use FD manual lenses occasionally and love the control ring idea on RF system.

[@nikoonikoo]

@@alcedo_kf I've got a cheap FD to RF adapter, works without a problem. I use the regular EF to RF adapter for my EF lenses. Thanks

[@TeddyCavachon]

I purchased the basic $99 Canon brand adapter and the $149 Meike VND adapter which I use for stills and video, respectively on my new R6mkII. I think the combination of the VND adapter + EF lens is actually more convenient for controlling video exposure than an RF lens with VND on the end of it.

[@garelbidi]

Hi ! Do we loose aperture by using this RF EF adapter ? If I use my 24-70 2.8 EF ?

[@TeddyCavachon]

@@garelbidi No loss of aperture with the non-filter adapter.

[@garelbidi]

@@TeddyCavachon thanks a lot. As I’m on a budget, I can’t afford 2k for the RF version. I was almost thinking of changing for the Sony A7iv, which has more affordable third parties lenses.

[@ianbrierley5671]

hi great video really useful to help decide. Can I ask is the clear drop in filter a UV filter? I dont like the idea of putting more glass infront of the lens esp as it may be inferior and affect the quality further?

[@Yassir_Saturno]

This was top quality my friend! So helpful!

[@Kristina-s9y4u]

A really good review and fair questions asked! Thank you!

[@dennisfahlstrom2515]

An aspect you didn’t mention is many photographers prefer keeping a filter like a skylight on the front of their lenses to protect them. The protection value is gone with this new concept. What about the value of my collection of different size and different use quality filters (skylight, polarizer, ND’s, vignette) designed to fit in front of the lens? Besides the overcharging, it seems like Canon blew the entire concept of this top end adapter design change. I went with the cheapest adapter which is consistent with my wanting to continue using my expensive and numerous EF “L” lenses rather than shelling out serious cash for these RF lenses. I like my R6 a lot but won’t be replacing my lenses until the new RF lenses come down very significantly in price …and even then, it will probably be on an ‘as needed’ basis since by that time the EF’s will have little value remaining. Between the 50mm f1.2, the 16-35mm f2.8, the 35-70 zoom and the 70-300 zoom and the 600mm (all Canon L) I have a lot tied up in lenses.

[@shutterbird13]

Thank you for this. While I like the idea of the drop in filter, at 3x the price of the basic, I think I'll stick with the basic and save the extra $ to put toward RF lenses.

[@tender.branson]

Drop-in filter also protects your sensor from dust and mechanical damage.

[@alidaoust3581]

I really liked the control ring on my old Pentax film camera but now you make a really good point about it being so close to the body.

[@dcairns61]

I got the $50 ebay special. Works great. No bells and whistles, just lets me use my EF lenses on my R8

[@itty_bitty_ginger]

This was so informative! I now know what I want and how it will affect my future purchases! Thank you so much for a good video! 👏🏻 👏🏻 👏🏻

[@CaravanMovies]

sir does it support only ef lenses or we also can use efs lenses using these adapters ?

[@nousvideobusiness]

Thanks for this!! Really well explained and very nice, coherent pacing

[@KaylaJohnson-j8r]

Thanks! Which adapter to use for the Canon R6 Mark ii with a Sigma Art lens?

[@julianns3238]

Will the kolari filters work in the canon adapter or do you have to buy the kolari adapter?

[@mdturnerinoz]

I have had all three adapters since my EOS-R; I now use them on my R5/R6. I find the control ring useless; I misuse it so often hitting the wrong setting(s) by accident I stopped using it on my adapters AND my 4 RF lenses. Maybe one day ... BUT I do like the drop-in model a lot for my 9 EF L lenses: I get a CPL and ND without messing with the front of the lens! Yea! Also, I started to sell my Lauwa EF Probe lens to get an RF version UNTIL it occurred to me that the EF version of the probe lens was better for my use because of the EF/RF drop-in adapter on my R5/R6; so, no RF probe lens needed.

[@andyh8239]

5D 3/4 allowed you to adjust ISO by holding OK and rotating top wheel. I assume all these controls carry over to R5 II ?

[@madbadger85]

The problem with the control ring adapter is trying to adjust it when you have a big lens on like a EF 70-200 upwards to a 500f4. You can’t lets the weight of the lens pull on the camera mount while you mess around with the control ring, you have to support the lens with one hand and that’s not gonna be your shutter button hand!! Setup your camera with custom function buttons.

[@coordinacion-flashesandsou3736]

Does the clear filter have any use really? Aside from filling that gap left, I mean... Maybe it protects the camera sensor from any dust the lenses could carry?

[@ReneKnoop]

Solid review! I use the ND adaptor on my R & R5 all the time, very useful when filming. (it even kind of hold me off from purchasing RF glass) Instead of buying the clear filter I just bought another basic adaptor for about the same price as a clear filter, so no messing around with the ND filter. Got me thinking though...do you need a clear filter when the ND is out? Would be useful to just have the outside part of the filter holder, it clicks right in.

[@ForeverYoung007]

I agree, what they should have done is included a blank dummy insert that contains no filter but seals the adapter: My assumption is that they include a `clear` filter to justify charging $129 for a plastic product that probably costs < 7$ to manufacture

[@chrisknight7822]

I just got my hands on an R7 and already the lack of three dials is frustrating me, so for the R7 I would say the control ring adapter is the essential choice.

[@dominey]

Interesting! Thanks Chris

[@vinjass]

I'm about to get the R/, what do you mean with lack of three dials? Are those the buttons to change the speed, aperture and iso? So are you recommending the control ring lens to help assign one of those to the lens?

[@chrisknight7822]

@@vinjass Yes I like to shoot in Manual on Auto-ISO, so need to be able to change shutter speed, aperture and exposure compensation quickly. The R7 means I have to dive into a menu to do exp.comp. which is annoying. On adapted lenses the control ring would be a nifty workaround.

[@vinjass]

@@chrisknight7822 aah I see!! This is very helpful, I've only used my old T4i so I'm used to using the shutter wheel and the button + wheel to move the aperture

[@boulx]

thinking about imelapses day time and the nd mounted looks like the best

[@hansbachtold1966]

Hi Todd, thanks for all the explaination to this adaptors. Was their any specific reason for Canon to change the connection to a new system ? I am changing to the Canon R10. I have about 6 EF-S lenses which i will not get rid of, because their are all in good shape.

[@diegograjales9764]

So how long was the wait? From the time u ordered... To the time received your adapters?

[@nixland]

Thanks for sharing. So the control adapter only give additional control ring as additional "button" or it gives more compatibility with Canon R camera system like AF etc.?

[@bkansara9]

Excellent comparison video. Very useful. It helped me deciding which adaptor to buy. Thanks.

[@vesimittari]

It is a pocket adapter. After you have only RF-lenses, what to do with this adapter? Your only possibility is to put it into your pocket. - I want to keep my trusty EF 50mm/1.2 lens as long as possible. It is now free, it looks good (the best looking Canon lens), it is sharp enough, it is small by size and I love it.

[@harrison00xXx]

I love to use modified inserts with astrofilters. Waited for a long time, even after i decided to get these EF RF adapter with PL filter i had to wait for my order about 3 months.

[@cerec69]

So, if your shooting in manual mode 100% of the time without a bracket is it a good buy until you upgrade to all RF glass?🤔

[@movax20h]

Nice video. How well do these adapters work with non-Canon lenses? Most of are full frame EF lenses from Tamron. But I also do have few Zeiss and Sigma lenses, and maybe few other esoteric ones (like Samyang, Rokinon, Lens Baby). (some do not have any electronics, some do have iris, some do auto-focus, image stabilization, etc). I think I only have one or two canon lenses (fixed focal length, one of the the pancake lens). Wish I could use them for example on R5 C. Thanks.

[@cre8ivecommerce]

Hi 🙂 Thx for vid! Question,,, these adapters do not alter the focal length,,, yes? Thx :-)

[@RynaxAlien]

Do these adapters work as well as native lens, fast and precise AF? Better than Canon EF lens on Sony E mount?

[@davecustance3423]

Great vid with some great advice thanks Dave

[@the.jonfernandez]

Awesome explanation! I’ve been stuck for a while on whether I should save up and invest in RF glass or get an adapter and buy cheaper EF glass and honestly think I’d prefer spending the extra money not to have to worry about having an adapter with me at all times

[@dominey]

I know what you mean. I just returned from a trip where I was constantly switching between two EF lenses and one RF lens and the whole adapter/no-adapter thing got pretty old. In some ways having all EF lenses would have been easier.

[@jaymills1720]

That’s a recipe For spending more money. Save the cash. Buy third party ef used and an adapter.

[@garyrowe58]

With only EF lenses, my adaptor stays on the body ALL of the time, and I can use a polarising filter with every lens - even when their lens hoods are on!

[@올리버1349]

Right, i'm sold, no control ring.

[@kevinvanvechten]

Would you recommend the canon r50 using one of these adapters.?

[@darkshaman7087]

I have been for sometime deciding what camera to buy next and it was either the Sony A7iv or the Canon R6ii and I have decided the Canon but I have many lenses as I use the older Canon 6D and mainly for astro landscape photoghrapy but I do like taking wildlife etc as well, but as I got many lenses for my 6D I will have to buy an adaptor and i'm just wondering how good they are and also I know the R6ii not got many choices of lenses out there and are expensive, so please could someone tell me how good are the adaptors?👍 cheers

[@ErickPacheco-l6x]

Any crop with these adapters? Either on a r10/r7 or r5/r6

[@sempringham3868]

Did you notice any deterioration in image quality in using the adapter?

[@apjgraphix]

I actually messed up a shoot because I was using the adapter with the ND filter and while I was changing I accidentally moved the dial and made my exposure darker, I also had my camera on auto ISO, so you can only imagine how noisy my final footage was😢.

[@joyceyxi11]

I just got the one with the control ring! Question- when you put the adaptor on the camera, is it supposed to be super stiff to turn into place? I find that using mine on my r6 Mkii, it feels so hard to turn compared to using an old ef lens on an ef body…

[@angelllacuna8889]

Can I adjust the exposure compensation with the control ring that comes with one of the models of the EF- RF adapter ?

[@jimgreulich7860]

Thanks for this great overview! I just started considering upgrading my old 6D to the R5 given the deals currently on and since I have 2 EF-L lenses, definitely will need 1 of these adapters. I was originally thinking of going the drop-in route, but you covered a couple of important cons I wasnt considering... especially the extra ridiculous cost of the glass insert! Furthermore, this spurred me to realize that I already have the polarizing & ND filters I need for my EF-L lenses, so this would literally be a huge waste of money in my situation since as you mentioned, you can't use the drop-in adapter with the new RF lenses (I'm also leaning towards getting the 70-200 f4 in your video). So bottom line, I will probably get the control ring version since it's available for $150 on sale now... probably would have went with the basic one if not for the sale but $50 seems much more easy to swallow than double @ $100 more. ;-)

[@gabriellechisholm5411]

Thanks Todd. That was very helpful. Great review......

[@dianelep]

This was SO helpful- thank you!

[@JoshySinger]

Very helpful review man, thank you so much for all the information!

[@jennicanela]

Thank you for explaining this so well!

[@michaelranger9104]

Sorry if this seems a silly question but is by using a adapter between the lens and the sencer not the same as using a extension tube,,, all be it changing the ring size?if this is the case I dont see any where what the equivalent tube rating will be? ...sorry if its a silly question.

[@davidbuljubasic2624]

Thank u for the review I love it I'm broke right now can't use any of my L series ef lenses on my eos rp so watching u talk more about it makes me want it more any of them lmao would work for me not so picky because I spent all saved money on mirrorless and rf 50mm 1.8 aperture lol but ur information helps alot

[@georgiawade6241]

what adapter would you need to connect RF lenses to a old DSLR camera?

[@przybylskipawel]

Does the control ring allow to adjust apeture? Would this adapters work with Sigma/Tokina glass for APS-C on R7?

[@RayHoth]

It does not add to the base focal length for EF glass, does it? Since technically it is further away from the sensor with the adapter on. I am new to photography and just got an R6 with the base adapter. I have an EF 70-200 and was wondering what the effect might be.

[@BrianLuenser]

I sure do thank you for this information! Just what I needed!

[@lizaderenchenko]

So I guess the variable nd filter doesnt start at a neutral clear setting ? I might have assumed that .... 0.o

[@lisalynnmarie]

That was so helpful!! Thank you so much!

[@Arkayem]

I have a viltrox with the control ring. I personally like having the ring closer to the body. With this I can control my entire exposure triangle on the fly with one hand never leaving the viewfinder

[@counterfit5]

You can do this without using the control ring on the R3-6. That does require your thumb to do double duty, though.

[@Arkayem]

@@counterfit5 I commented what I commented specifically because none of my fingers were pulling double duty.

[@boblarsen7984]

Todd are these adapters going to work on the new EOS R10?

[@nehemiahtidwell1023]

Question so if I have a ef mount camera I would need a ef-rf adapter?

[@wojtekbulski9955]

Hey ! Is it Canon "EF to RF" or "RF to EF" ? ;)

[@brianmorrison9937]

The adapter with the control ring did not adjust my apeture on my 70-200 L lens in manual mode. I must me apeture mode in order to make adjustments.

[@pigletsdaddy3052]

Thanks. Just what I wanted to know

[@naturebypamfitzpatrick2855]

Thanks for the great review! This was very helpful!

[@DethronerX]

Hello, I recently got a 25mm f1.4 cctv lens which came with a c mount for canon m, m2, m3, so which adapter should I get instead for 25mm to Canon 60D