Canon EOS R10 and R7 First Impressions Review (From Orlando!)

[@spritual_enlightenment]

They didn't over-heat at Florida. That's a good sign.

[@ME2K23]

No, only Canadians do (overheat in Florida) 😉

[@martinXY]

It's not the heat, it's the humidity.

[@ThaexakaMavro]

@@ME2K23 you never been in quebec lol 😂

[@ME2K23]

@@ThaexakaMavro 😀 Actually yes! Quebec may be warmer than Alberta but its much colder than florida, that's why I said they would overheat over there (joke)... I know some Canadians like to go there in the winter, but I guess they are still more cold resistant than heat resistant 😉

[@aryadwitama]

You have no idea what i have been through living in asia.

[@Yupppi]

The rolling shutter effect on football was amazing. It made real life look like the NES game Nintendo World Cup back in the 80's/90's with supershots where the ball would warp to an ellipsoid.

[@asmaisgatas100]

Im impressed. R7: - two card slots - ibis - weather sealed - digic x - dual pixel af II - 32mb -1499 seems good 👍

[@MichaelGazeley]

Really strange there’s no battery grip option. Why did Canon do this?

[@alkevinzmedia]

Wonder if they will make a RF 10-18mm IS Lens

[@kenduejones]

Hope so

[@tysonator5433]

The deal breaker is the R7 price is pretty good as the eos 7dii was apx £1,400 on launch. As I am 7Dii owner the R7 makes a lot sense and would be a great upgrade. Before the this event the only option I had wax R6 at £2,500not a very affordable route. Most canon user I meet at events are 7Dii users so I suspect there will be a lot of 7Dii hitting the used are very soon !

[@gary_michael_flanagan_wildlife]

The R6 is fantastic for wildlife, birds. I am really impressed with it. Plus it doubles as a great landscape portrait camera too. It took me a little while to get used to full frame, as you feel like you are losing something but you really aren’t in reality. I am hoping the R7 shares the image quality of the full frame and I would definitely pick one up and move my R6 over to just macro, landscapes and portraits only. I do miss those APS sensors for sure!

[@davidwallace258]

It’s not weather sealed, so till it is I’ll stick with my 7DMK2.

[@krisdeaglephotography4539]

@@davidwallace258 the R7 is

[@davidwallace258]

@@krisdeaglephotography4539 if I’m not wrong R7s weather sealing is to the same level as the D90 which has had issues reported on this front. The 7Dmk11 is much better weather sealed which you need for wildlife photography in the uk. I would expect that the weather sealing on the R3 and R5 to be as good as on the 7Dmk11

[@krisdeaglephotography4539]

@@davidwallace258 that much, I do not know.

[@Richard_Bumblebee]

I was watching the EOS R6 Review last night from 2020. Jordan's Amadeus shirt has seen much better days.

[@JohnArmwood]

Please compare these cameras to the EOS Mark 6 II.

[@brianmiller921]

OMG you guys are right down the street from me. I live in Celebration. I wish I new you were here. I would love to meet you.

[@pertang630]

To me, this is to just get the low end, beginner market again, especially with the R10. I can't see them fleshing out the APS-C RF lens line-up, just as they didn't do a lot with the DSLR APS-C lenses. The R7 could be useful for birders and people that need the extra reach of the crop though.. I have a Canon 70D, and will be going to Full frame as soon as I can scrounge enough money to make the transfer with a couple of lenses, but it's most likely going to be Sony Full Frame. I may consider something like a R10 as a replacement for my 70D as a short term upgrade, (if it is an upgrade for me) but here in Australia, The R7 is only $100 less than a Sony A7III, so I wouldn't want to spend that kind of money for a stop gap camera, I would just spend the money on going full frame.

[@thebentzenable]

I am buying it for wildlife 🥰 thanks Canon.

[@ChowDownDetroit]

I would stick with full frame RP over the R7. Just my opinion.

[@jjproductions9538]

Tell Canon to make something like RF-S 15-55mm f1.8 IS USM lens to accomodate those specs in the R7. That would be like their RF 28-70mm f2 for APS-C mirrorless line-up.

[@TheAfricanChronicles]

Any idea if a battery grip will be available for the R7?

[@markwalker8374]

Is non-oversampled 4k 60p a hardware limitation on the R7 or could be added later software update? For a wildlife/sports camera good slow-mo video is needed, ideally at 4k 120p

[@ScottJWaldron]

Great job on the video guys. Looks like a fun trip! As an EF-M user I'm not thrilled to see the M5 Mark II released as an RF mount camera, but I get the whole wanting to match Sony/Nikon and please the one mount multiple sensor format people. It does hurt to see I'll never get the longer per clip video recording times in-camera on EF-M. Bought a Ninja V to do that with the M6ii (plus h.265 8-bit for storage savings). Maybe another used M6ii is in my future until I see what Sony and Nikon come up with moving forward. ;D Might as well buy only used EF-M gear at this point unless there is a big discount discontinuation sale. 9:15 battery oopsy. ;D I once made a video where I called "FOV" "perspective" instead. Still hurts me to this day because the video is one of my more popular ones lately, heh.

[@truthseeker6804]

m6ii records for 30 minute, this has no recording limit.

[@ScottJWaldron]

@@truthseeker6804 per clip

[@larissauemura8416]

Thank you for the review!

[@przybylskipawel]

At 1:28 the photo is really @6400ISO?? @1/160s?? Was it shot in a cave? It clean like glacier water. Wasn't it ISO640?

[@PhotoSportiv]

before I consider getting the R7, I'll have to check out the lists of compatable EF lenses that can shoot FULL fps in mechanical..if there is one.

[@Cotictimmy]

Would you go APSC R7? Maybe - if it proved to be Nikon D500 beater. (You can get a used D500 for $1200 - so the R7 will have to be fantastic. R7 vs D500 will be the comparison to see.

[@marcofabiocarosi2996]

I’d consider apsc niche cameras in the pro market. I would have preferred a stripped down ff.

[@truthseeker6804]

then go for eosrp or eosr

[@LucaBono.Studio]

Cool cameras! Now it's time for Canon to make a rangefinder style camera like the old Canonet with a fixed lens ❤️

[@NarodowySchab]

Thanks for good review! It is possible to turn-off this autofocus-small region select during filming 4k ? i want to catch wide range of nearest obiects like tires pile-2-3meters walking around without any bluring backgrounds and focusing ?

[@SquirrelHybrid]

That mechanical shutter sounds aggressive! 😄

[@wickie4801]

1 Why not buy fullframe R6/R7 directly? 2 The truth is Canon has ring the dead bell for APSC M-series. The formfactor of this - unless the unknown problems for years - is great. Easy to use, easy to carry around. Why buy the new ones? Only to have R-system compatibility and winning future.

[@wickie4801]

Thank you, but sorry vikings are not using instagram😅 Looking your videos for long time. No. 1📸 Kind regards, Chris

[@plasticphotochannel]

The ball is not round at 15:36? CMOS readout speeds too slow?

[@DerPhiL]

yes

[@Kevon420]

Once Canon make a equivalent to Fuji’s XF 10-24mm f4 and 33mm f1.4, the R7 will be *very* hard to resist. This camera has just about everything I can ask for in a APS-C camera. The video specs are really nice (not ultra deluxe, but I’ve seen other videos where the footage out of it is quite impressive) and the stills capabilities are wonderful. Definitely my next camera purchase and certainly the first mirrorless APS-C system (besides Fujifilm) that has impressed me in a long time.

[@muttishelfer9122]

No lenses, no interest.

[@albertomuniz7068]

You have the EF-s 10-18, very good and very cheap.

[@muttishelfer9122]

@@albertomuniz7068 i dont want to invest in old DSLR lenses, when there are plenty of new native options on other Systems.

[@NoRegret08]

For $100 more, I would rather get EOS R with RF 14-35 F4 for landscape photography.

[@paceyombex]

Goodbye EOS-M, it's nice to know you.

[@sylviezi9600]

Jared Polin is in the same place with the same gear! 😆

[@ronbyram3880]

any word why no Battery Grip? using the larger lens on the R7 and sports shooting Id hate to keep swapping batteries? I use the grip on my R6 and fire off 3k photos per sporting event.

[@shojunichi]

Wow! Can't wait to try them out!

[@Ponskippa]

Also.. M amount officially dead?

[@aditya_gupta]

Footage looks pretty good

[@PhotographerSen]

Finally after 8 whole damn years, the everlasting soul od Eos 7Dii can rest in peace...🙏🙏🙏 (or maybe not, depending on R7 price). You'll be remembered as a milestone, dear dslr... PS: And again....crippled! 🌚

[@orloaguilar]

It'll be $1499 body only

[@fabrian78]

I really thought I was hearing woodpeckers until I realized it was the shutter..

[@rgarciap7]

Is there a video recording limit for these new Canon cameras?

[@oj6503]

I so want the R7 , I mostly photo indoor sports. Will this camera work for me anyone who knows ? Currently using the Nikon D7200 but changing over to Canon.

[@onlyonecannoli3952]

Simple question. Will the straight out comera jpegs look as good as those coming out of an Iphone 13 or similar phone. Yes, I know, the bigger sensor will provide better ultimate resolution and image quality. However, most users of the R10 camera will not have the knowledge to get those type of results. For example, will and HDR photo look as good and be as seemless to take as it is with an Iphone? The R10 doesn't have IBIS, but my Iphone does. Will the camera embed gyro stabilization data for post production stabilization? Does the video metadata include information on the orientation so that video shot in portrait has the right orientation straight out of camera? Is there a seemless connection between my camera and phone, so that I may transfer photos and videos on the fly? Yeah, I thought not. Computational photography in phones will soon destroy the mirrorless market unless such features trickle down to camera bodies. Ease of use and connectivity is what this segment is looking for. No matter how nice the image quality is, this camera will flop if getting connected with your phone requires a degree. Basically, people want the easy of their Iphone, with many lens options, and bigger sensor of traditional cameras. R U Listening CANON!?

[@truthseeker6804]

although youre right, the camera companies dont care and neither should that bother you. learn the camera and buy what works for you.

[@unknownKnownunknowns]

Thanks for tis gents! Would you ( or anyone else here) upgrade to the R7 from a 5D MkIV for hybrid outdoor sports shooting?

[@philiphoskins7161]

Titgents .. (?) .. i'm going to get my glasses .. ..

[@JoeMaranophotography]

Please be cheap and please have great AF for wildlife! Us folks that don't want to pay £10k+ for a wildlife setup have it so hard right now lol

[@pjw2000]

Two Canadians in Florida. My condolences.

[@seantomlinson3320]

Canon may care about APS-C mirrorless? Excellent. Fascinating about the sensors.

[@truthseeker6804]

wow, im blown away. no cripple hammer! awesome! well done to canon.

[@burritobrosvideos8060]

4k60 is crippled. R10 won't close shutter to change lens. Crappy 10. R7 has crap 120p. Removed third dial in r7. Worse weather sealing in both cameras. No apsc lenses in existence other than slow kit lenses. No white balance quick select in video. Drops histogram in video. Very overpriced.

[@truthseeker6804]

@@burritobrosvideos8060 tell me which sony camera under 2000 has 4k60 and closes shutter? none. and dont mention panasonic or fuji their autofocus is crap. many people literally bought a7iv for cropped 4k60. btw objectively the a7iv is a better camera. just showing this is a good camera. youre going around hating these cameras. lol.

[@burritobrosvideos8060]

@@truthseeker6804 just because you don't like facts doesn't make them any less true. The canon cripple hammer has struck these down again. Oh canon, when will you learn?

[@truthseeker6804]

@@burritobrosvideos8060 you didnt answer my question. tell me which sony camera under 2000 has 4k60 and closes shutter? wheres your fact? the fact remains fuji and pannyboy autofocus is crap. thats a known fact.

[@burritobrosvideos8060]

@@truthseeker6804 unfortunately for canon, the fuji flagship model is coming out next week and everyone is going to buy that over this toy from canon. It's better in literally every way

[@rich060286]

No one has mentioned bird eye AF? Don’t think it’s carried down the r3, R5, R6 eye focus. Not surprising for cost but important to know

[@IAmR1ch]

It has, seen it on Jared Polin, he tested it, also he human eye and vehicle.

[@robertbohnaker9898]

Great cameras for entry level folks. Lots of features…good reviews guys. Now go back to the hotel and take showers . Phew ! 🤭

[@stalman]

Great to see Canon get into this space, now I just want to see some small lens options and I’ll pick one up right away!

[@vlcheish]

Repeat after me "we need open gate", "we need open gate" "we need open gate"!!!!

[@1fareast14]

Given how ef-s, dx, and Sony e went, I'm not optimistic

[@bngr_bngr]

Canon never had a large selection of APSC lens for its DSLR crops. I’m glad the new cameras can use RF/EF lenses.

[@jeni719]

In short term, need to buy the EF-RF adapter, and then can use all the EF-S glass. For people looking at the R10 price range, that is a great option.

[@DrWurzeli]

@@1fareast14 e-mount has amazing lenses from third party manufacturers for both aps-c and fullframe. after all you could also mount your ff glass on the aps-c bodys if you wanted to

[@marendradika]

Make a Comparison Photo and Video Result of Canon R7 vs Sony A6600 vs Fujifilm X-T4; and Canon R10 vs Sony A6100 vs Fujifilm X-A7 vs Nikon Z50 ...please...Thank you

[@scrapheap6031]

R7 being 10 bit really makes me think it could be a B cam to my R5C whenever I decide to get another camera

[@legendp2011]

R7 would be a perfect fit with the sigma 18-35mm f1.8, with the ef to rf nd adapter. IBIS, Nd, 10 bit, affordable (although no raw)

[@GHABAHIA]

@@legendp2011 As u said NO RAW!!

[@presise1620]

R7 only 10 bit in clog 3 where the R5c can do 10 bit in any mode or profile.

[@Aviciiz]

DR looks pretty poor tho

[@scrapheap6031]

@@Aviciiz true but tons of content have been shot on cameras with worse DR in the past it's workable

[@trym2121]

I doubt Canon will make any 'proper' apsc prime, RF already have 16 2.8 pancake, quite Compact 35 and 50 1.8, etc. That pretty much covered 24, ~50, and ~85. Maybe Canon will port the efm 22 to complete the list with 35mm eq

[@sophieedel6324]

Canon won't make any APS-C primes for these cameras. The goal is to get people to buy expensive full frame R lenses, it's the exact same goal as the Nikon Z50. I am sticking with my EF-S DSLR and EOS-M cameras. If Canon stops developing them, I am moving to Fuji. EOS R is too expensive and too bulky.

[@zegzbrutal]

@@sophieedel6324 you can always adapt your EF-S lens onto R cameras, they work well

[@craigman7262]

why spend development money on a market that has small profits

[@stevencrabtree1409]

I haven't seen how the elements are laid out but the 18-150 looks a lot like the EF-M version with a bigger flange to cover the RF mount. I suspect we'll see a couple of lenses ported over in the future, particularly the 11-22.

[@orangorill]

So the R10 is a considerably pricier and slightly heavier M50 II, with a kit lens that's 18mm at the wide end instead of 15mm? A little disappointing really. Hope they'll port over the M primes at least.

[@montagdp]

Agreed. The body itself is better than the M50 II, but it's also bigger, uglier (IMO), and more expensive. The kit zoom range is really limiting. A big no from me so far. If my M50 died today I'd be looking into other systems.

[@jeni719]

R10 has significantly better video with the full sensor 4K oversamples at 6K, plus get the RF mount which is definitely where Canon sees the future at. If you don't need the 4K uncropped video, then the M50 is still a great camera. M50 still sell very well in Japan!!

[@quickfilmmakingtips2870]

@@montagdp yeah Fuji and Sony are the only brands that haven’t disappointed me yet

[@jgooch99]

I guess I’m in the group of people who wanted an update of the Eos r and the rp. Better dynamic range, increased shutter speed, 10 bit 4K 60 with no loss in quality.

[@SDK2006b]

I love it when camera reviewers say 15fps mechanical isn’t much….. when just 10 years ago a Pro 1Dx was blazing fast at 11fps 🤣

[@jenesuispasbavard]

I hope they make smaller APS-C prime lenses in the same mount, instead of just recommending using massive full-frame RF lenses.

[@CodeTravelwithRizwan]

Fuji X-H2 and X-H2s will knock out this and all other APSC CAMERAS......😂😂😂

[@shaunak2781]

I love these cameras, but i just watch the videos to hear chris say... Blah blah blah BUT !!! blah blah

[@grdprojekt]

Still making my minds up for the camera themselves (though tbh happy to see APS-C with RF mount), but definitely disappointed by the RF-S 18-45mm kit lens. Canon mated the EF-S 18-55mm and the EF-M 15-45mm but take the shortest zoom range? It's not even that fast.

[@problemat1que]

F4.5-6.3 - "not that fast" is an understatement in a world where 18-55 F2.8-4 exists.

[@Clove_Parma]

@@problemat1que don’t forget canon’s old 17-55 f2.8 either!

[@EternalMedia]

I video shoot the R10 on a gimbal, so the lack IBIS isn't a problem. But what's the best approach to photo shooting with unstabilized lenses (like the RF 50mm1.8) without a tripod?

[@y34r]

People said Fuji still better option? How? If you need good AF , canon is much better choices. Ofc if you like film simulation , Fuji is better choice.

[@1barnet1]

Because you can actually buy lenses for the fujifilms that fit the size of the respective bodies. With focal lengths you'd actually use. AF on fujifilm is pretty decent unless it's very dim. Eye detect isn't as good though. Never use it because of it's inconsistency.

[@PradyutBafna]

Would love a comparison of R7 with R6 for a casual wildlife photography enthusiast (if that’s even a thing!). Also, would love to understand the total cost of ownership with recommended canon and 3rd party lenses for each of these bodies. Curious about what body + lens combos makes best sense for someone who wants to use this as a primary camera (like for birthdays, family trips, weekend getaways, kids sports, kids portraits, fall photography, etc.) along with wildlife/sports oriented trip like birding, safaris, skiing, racing, etc. So hard to find this kind of a comparison online and I suspect this is the market Canon is targeting with the R7 and R6 (albeit for a more serious enthusiast).

[@SMGJohn]

R7 is cheaper than Fuji XT-4, really interesting! But the Panasonic S5 is always on sale and just getting cheaper, hard choice, amazing video features, best of the best IBIS versus an okay APS-C camera with the body of a freaking full frame camera and okay video features, damn.

[@Emilioh888]

S5 AF isn’t on par with competition but image quality is superb

[@adnan_velic]

The xt4 is a far superior camera to the R7. The fact that it is back side illuminating is a huge deal and ALONE worth paying a little extra for. Besides that fuji glass especially the 16-55mm f2.8 is so sharp that the xt4 can’t even take full advantage of it. Also 400mb bit rate in 4:2:0 10bit h265 is pretty nuts and all that in 4k60p.

[@SMGJohn]

@@adnan_velic Fuji XT4 has a lot of impressive specs but one thing it does not have is good ergonomics. The 16-55mm f2.8 is also interesting lens but its pretty old when compared to Samsung 16-50mm F2-2.8 considering the Fuji one is larger. Sony also has some really small f2.8 zooms for their APS-C's, and with stabilisation, if Fuji made a camera with a regular body with good grip and a F2.8 zoom with built in stab and small size, it be a killer system honestly.

[@SMGJohn]

@@Emilioh888 S5 AF is good if you tell it what to do, as long as you got light and contrast it can get the job done well, I agree its not perfect but its like, these days you buy a camera with compromises, its just matter of what compromises you can live with.

[@adnan_velic]

@@SMGJohn I got a small rig grip for mine. Fits perfectly and gives me additional benefits besides better grip. The Samsung lens is designed for a camera that is obsolete NX mount…. Sure there are better options in lenses but I’m saying if you’re looking at an R7 specifically this cannot compete with an xt4. Also that IBIS in the xt4 is really good at 5.5 stops. I had an S5 as well and I enjoy and prefer the image coming out of the xt4 much more. The dynamic range out of the x trans sensor is pretty damn impressive. Not as much as the S5 but certainly better than a canon R line camera.

[@MrGourd]

Decent cameras. But I wish Canon instead updated their R and RP since these cameras are full frame but also close in price to the R7 and R10.

[@yoginwidhi6676]

I agree

[@GrandHuevotes]

Agree we need an RP Mark II. Badly. I’d like one with an M6 style format with no viewfinder.

[@kenjiyamamoto423]

it will come soon,. trust me,.. i feel it will be on the spot of R8 (Eos R) & R9 (Eos RP) trust me dude this will be huge,.

[@bunmeng007]

I disagree. Canon needs R mirrorless apsc to capture the travel and wildlife photographers. Probably the mark ii of R and RP will be released later this year imo.

[@okaro6595]

Different cameras for different uses. If you wont full frame go for R3.

[@stubones]

The R7 is the logical upgrade for those of us still having to use a 7Dii for outdoor daylight sports. Paired with an adapter and my ef 100-400ii it would be perfect. I don't need even 15fps. 12 would be ideal.

[@DavidPetryk]

It would be if Canon had some kind of 150or 200-600mm lens for it but they don't so the r7 is useless.

[@4orrcountry]

"...still having to use..." one of the best cameras ever made - poor baby.

[@lesiakadam1977]

Rebel Rebel Rebel... It' would be ridiculous to keep two different naming conventions for different continents. R10/R7 make more sense.

[@ostettivictor]

Still waiting for nikon to put out that D500 repleacement

[@reccocon3442]

A bit hypersensitive of you, if you don't like the grip much esp those with shorter fingers. The point is, does it take awesome pics. ?

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

It looks like, with video-on attached to the on-off switch, the R7 has 3 programmable custom modes for video as well as photo. That function is sorely lacking on the R6. I also presume that's a full-size HDMI port under that door. How did video nerd Jordan not touch on the HDMI since he's always complaining about mini/micro HDMI ports?

[@dpreview]

Micro HDMI port. Jordan is annoyed.

[@lewcehjitl3282]

Good to see canon AF finally surpass Sonys AF especially animal eye af. If canon starts to make small compact cameras they can take out Sony in the hybrid section to be honest image quality is superb and now video is getting better. My a7iv AF struggles with birds behind cages while the canon r6 grabs the eye right away. Kudos to canon.

[@wolfgangpetersun2730]

A very excellent First Impression Review ! After waiting for a Sony A7000 for so long (in December 2019 I had bought a Sony A6600 out of desperation) and thinking about a Sony A7 IV or a GH6 for the last few months, the R7 seems to be the closest to my needs , if the R7 together with the adapter works well with old EF lenses. So, besides Nikon FF (D800), MFT and Sony APS-C lenses, I have to think about joining the Canon system.

[@kaneclements7761]

I recently moved to Sony and got a used excellent condition A7R IV for a about £2000. Unless the weight is an issue the 60MP IV will give you an edge on quality over APS-C. If you are shooting wild life one has to get closer, use better glass and get more MP. I think going down the APS-C route can, note can, be a bit of a blind alley.

[@Dzaen2]

Like anyone is gonna buy a 1k R10 and the 3k 50mm f1.2 lens... shake my head sometimes with these tests.

[@-grey]

I really wish companies would cater to the snapshot and street shooter who likes quality. The M6II was great. Compact, flip up screen for waist-level shooting. The X-E4 too, but they seem to be fading out of priority for larger chunky tank bodies. And if they do make something like the A7C it's so hindered by bargain tech it's not really worth it, especially for the price.

[@gtaliano]

Street photography is moving fast towards Cell Phones.... sadly.

[@-grey]

@@gtaliano I've never seen a cell phone that could keep up with something like the Ricoh GR even. There's got to be a market for people who still print work.

[@gtaliano]

@@-grey i said sadly. Because of safety and convenience. Not Quality. I agree with you.

[@-grey]

@@gtaliano fair enough, my mistake. What do you mean by Saftey.

[@gtaliano]

@@-grey Safety,

[@BartechTV]

Used to shoot Canon 10 years ago. Long since switched to Sony, then Panasonic, and now Fujifilm. Can't see any compelling reason to switch back. Feels like Canon has been playing catch up for a decade now and still can't lift themselves out of third or fourth place.

[@jpprovost64]

i love my R7 i sold my 90D and i dont regret it ... think too sell my 1500 600 sigma for the 100 500 L Canon But $$

[@ProbablyAnAmateur]

did you get an adapter instead?

[@Ponskippa]

The R line is getting confusing

[@trevorhawkins1626]

I feel like these cameras are really meant for sports and wildlife where it's nice to have the extra reach and good auto focus, and they are a much cheaper alternative to the R5 or R6. I feel like the R7 will make a perfect pair for my EOS R.

[@oyedread]

I feel the R10 will make the perfect pair with my RP... made the choice cause of battery LP-E17

[@alansach8437]

Agreed.

[@Anonymous-iw4hx]

-S lenses again? seriously canon? seriously?

[@okaro6595]

A camera needs lenses.

[@Anonymous-iw4hx]

@@okaro6595 well its the RF mount, many RF lenses available

[@specer73]

I switched from a Canon 100D to a Sony A7 III and I'm thinking about switching back to get more lightweight lenses and Canon colors. I would love to get a 24mm pancake

[@f52023]

Thank you for the review. How does R10 with ibis hold against R7 for handheld photography?

[@ProbablyAnAmateur]

R10 doesnt have IBIS, it'll rely on Lens IS.

[@popcornparam]

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 I strongly believe that the R7 is not a flagship apsc r camera. It's not a fully weather sealed body. It dosen't have the 3 pin remote connector It dosen't have gps It dosen't have 3 dial wheels. It dosen't have a full size or a mini hdmi It dosen't have wifi 6 support or an inbuilt wifi transmitter. Dosen't have a top info display screen like the R5 It dosen't have an Ethernet port / it dosen't support the WFT battery grip even though it's the same battery. And it dosen't have a CF express card. No flash sinc port And it dosen't have high res view finder and a high res back screen even though Canon already dose it for the R5. This is a 90d successor and not a 7d mark 2 successor. I think canon will put it all these features in an other camera and call it a R9 and that it will come with a 2000$ price tag .

[@rohaanmanzoor3268]

so Canon m mount is effectively dead?

[@jamesseward9263]

I think the R7 should have been named the R8 and left open the R7 for a stacked BSI sensor, a CF Express card and controls of the R5 🤔

[@michaelstoeckel2954]

Yes, but I think either the RP or the R well be called R8 in the future

[@paullanoue5228]

They could have done all those things,but the body would cost $3,000 dollars. Not the market they were going for.

[@Joe-hm1zk]

I just think those kit lenses look so weird with the massive mount

[@drewhalton]

📸🔨Cripple hammer strikes again!

[@jaychristianson]

Canadians in florida- as a Brit I feel for you!!

[@JayanandSupali]

At last an APS-C mirrorless. I have been waiting for long. The R7 seems to to be the spiritual successor of 7D. And i love 7D. I have one. Hope to test and get the R7. Just one berry berry important Question. Does the evf blank out while using continues shoot mode???

[@mmhhlee99]

So now they're gonna ditch EOS M system?

[@abp1400]

yup...

[@dtibor5903]

I think no, they are for very different users. The M50 is still a bestseller, I hope they upgrade it as I have many M lenses. If not, i will buy an R10 and make an M mount for it (the lens protocols should be absolutely compatible)

[@jasontaycs7195]

Well, 8 EF-M lenses since 2012-2022, vs 24 RF lenses since 2018-2022, I think it is pretty clear. The last EF-M lens was back in 2018.

[@dtibor5903]

I think they released these cameras because there is some demand for it. Personally I used both FF and crop systems, these 2 bodies are for wildlife/sports shooters, they are not replacing the M system. These are huge compared to the tiny M bodies.

[@dtibor5903]

@@jasontaycs7195 the lineup is complete, it has everything what a traveler needs. I do not expect or want chunky 2.8 zooms.

[@bluejays5660]

Already preordered an R7, it should pair nicely with my 100-500 for wildlife and BIF photography. Along with my R6, I should be good to go for some time! Until the next great thing comes along. 😳

[@NoRegret08]

A very interesting comparison would be R7 vs EOS R with RF 14-35 F4 L

[@iseewood]

So what happens to Canon’s M-series cameras? It seems unlikely they would support two lens mounts for APS-C going forward. Are those in the M-mount system SOL for future camera and lens releases?

[@koolkutz7]

They look pretty solid cameras but I still like using my Nikon D7500 & Fujifilm X-S10. Plus I am waiting eagerly for the forthcoming Fujifilm announcements next week :-)

[@ridgefield]

Not sure which feature is better than X-S10 or X-T4 which uses now an old tech. Looks like Canon wants to sell full frame cameras more.

[@sgoody1]

I use a D7500 but just find it too lumpy for me. Struggling to find a smaller kit to replace it. The Sony a6400 sounds good but doesn’t have image stabilisation. Nothing out there seems quite right?

[@ridgefield]

@@sgoody1 Both X-T4 and X-S10 have in body image stabilization.

[@sgoody1]

@@ridgefield Thanks - will look into those. On my brief search - that X-S10 may be perfect for me.

[@marcp.1752]

Chris Niccols: "..:The R10 is affordable...." 979 EUR for a APS-C body only....is quite a lot, especially with only 2 native APS-C Lenses, two slow 18-45 and 18-150 Zooms, and "old" EF-S APS-C Lenses with adapter only. Just for the record, into September 2021, the Fullframe Nikon Z5 was 999 EUR only, with IBIS, with dual card slots, etc. Albeit not that fast (R10 - 15fps mech. shutter), but much better IQ & DR, and weather sealing like the Z6 & Z7 Series, according to Nikon, too. ;-) /edit text added.

[@peter1112211]

First, thank you for great review. And to Fuji for investing in better sensor and chip technology ! As far as portraits and landscape shots I really, really enjoy my Fuji X--T4 and older gear's results. Comments: 1. If we can screw on a fan why can't we screw on a modular screen? (i.e. have a flippy screen version and a X-T3 style screen which we can buy separately), So neither photographers nor videographers need to compromise for latest tech? 2. Instead of eliminating SS, ISO, and exposure dials, Why not have 3 tactile (clicky) dials each with LED on top (LED would display SS, ISO, Exposure) By making dials with displays, the quick settings C1-C7 would have maximum positive effect, and people who like dials (many people who buy Fuji for similarly to film cameras) I suppose something like that could be done on aperture ring as well: have infinite turn, with an LED F# on the lens: thus aperture settings can be set by camera or manually with. i.e. apparent trend to eliminate aperture ring is worrying. 3. While it is tactile, making the S,C,M switch a button gives the setting C1-C7 modes max positive effect, so I support this new design decision. Also S,C,M switch has always looked a little weak. 4. Having the back dial on the X-H2S not be clickable is fine with me: I find on my X-t4 it is hard to tell if the force I'm applying is going to click it or rotate dial. The larger focus nub looks good on the X-H2S. Standardize it! The suggestions above would reduce some of the parts needed between various X-T cameras. In a supply-chain constrained world, with a lot of camera competition, having fewer Fuji models would help Fuji's R&D efforts stay better focused. Where possible standardize on what makes fanbase passionate. 5. Even if my X-T4 doesn't have processing power of X-H2S, please backport improved AF algorithms. Adding even an additional slower mode (but much more accurate focus!!) would help those of us who want to do light sport shooting, or just take pics of graduations where there are a lot of people in picture. Promises were made about AF improvements in X-T4 that are merely incremental compared to Sony and Canon's order of magnitude improvements. Backport improvements where possible to maintain the brand PASSION that got you where you are. Keep at it Fuji on the R&D side: keep innovating and pushing what is possible on your cameras & lenses. -Ben

[@Jimmyageek]

No 4K Apeature or Shutter Video Mode ???? WTF

[@MrDvaz]

R7 does not accept a battery grip.....no sale!!!!! CANON wants these cameras to be for parents and grandparents taking pictures.....canon does not want pros to be buying these and lose sales of the higher priced cameras....as much as I love canon every time they announce a product I am getting closer to jumping ship and join the SONY system....ok cameras.....and plenty of third party lenses....I was looking for a third body to compliment my R5 AND R3....and canon failed me one more time!!!!

[@kevinheg8814]

The R7 in a Body of the M-System would be amazing. But I will not buy a new R APS-C Camera. There are no good APS-C RF Lenses. Could need years to bring out a solid lens lineup and than these cameras are outdated :D After Canon is going bad on the M-System I will not invest in any other R Camera. Also that they not allow Sigma and Tamron on the RF Mount is bad for the competition. Bye Canon, I guess you lose a lot of EOS M Owners. :)

[@bubuli]

they didn't even mention the elephant in the room: what this means for the EOS M format. yes, undoubtedly EOS M is essentially dead...but i guess you can't criticize Canon for yet abandoning another mount?

[@Wabajak13]

A more entry level consumer M line seems like something worth keeping alive. I doubt it'll get more love, but might keep it around just to keep some percentage of the market.

[@bubuli]

@@Wabajak13 i personally don’t care about what Canon does to their M mount as i use Nikon…my problem with these sponsored previews is that they’re forbidden to say certain things which makes this whole thing disingenuous at best. if i sunk $$$ on the EOS M mount i’d be livid watching this video because i’m a target audience it’s an expectation that it’s supposed to address my concern about that and they didn’t even mention it.

[@ezraestrada4992]

I'm coming from Canon 6D with 2 full frame lenses. I'm glad that I can still use my current lenses with this new camera. I'll order the Canon R7, this will help me introduce my self and my son to wildlife photography.

[@misterfilmguy]

I was born and raised in Orlando and really didn't expect to see you guys walking around Gator Land anytime soon. Great video as always!

[@dct1]

Both seem great cameras. I currently have a canon m6 mkii and the R7 with the IBIS sounds and looks amazing but is it worth the higher price over R10? I don't do much video. Also no way to use any of my EFM lenses is a bummer.

[@BEHZADONIS]

Canon always deliver clean, simple and powerful cameras 💯

[@sophieedel6324]

It's an overpriced Rebel at twice the cost.

[@zegzbrutal]

@@sophieedel6324 Rebel don't have a AF system close to R10/R7

[@Benjamin_Jehne]

@@zegzbrutal We are in 2022, just saying. So I think, Sophie isn't that far of with her point. But thats an industry problem.

[@zegzbrutal]

@@Benjamin_Jehne OM-1, Fujis raw specs are close to R7... Yet no one complained