Carlo Rovelli on White Holes | Closer To Truth Chats

Theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli discusses his latest book, White Holes, which traces the ongoing adventure of his own cutting-edge research and outlines some of the most astounding ideas in astrophysics and cosmology. Rovelli investigates whether all black holes could eventually turn into white holes, equally compact objects in which the arrow of time is reversed.
Rovelli's book, White Holes, is available for purchase now: bit.ly/3VePaJC
Carlo Rovelli is a physicist and writer. He is currently a Distinguished Visiting Research Chair at the Perimeter Institute and core member of the Rotman Institute of Philosophy of Western University. Rovelli has dedicated his career to uniting the time-warping ideas of general relativity and the perplexing uncertainties of quantum mechanics.
Watch more Closer To Truth Chats: t.ly/jJI7e
0:27: Exploring the poetic parallels in astrophysics and cosmology through the lens of Dante's Divine Comedy.
4:49: Explanation of black holes formation and properties according to Einstein's theory.
9:43: Dynamic internal geometry of black holes challenges common static perception and location of singularity.
15:33: Concept of Singularity: A point in time marking the end of evolution, transitioning from Einstein's theory to Quantum phenomena.
19:47: Quantum gravity theories, such as Loop Quantum Gravity, provide insights into the nature of spacetime inside black holes.
24:48: Discussion on quantum mechanics features and tunneling effect in particles.
29:18: Mystery of white holes near black holes explained by their behavior and interchangeability near the horizon.
33:55: Unveiling the Mystery of Black Holes and White Holes through Quantum Gravity Concepts
38:47: Exploring the potential existence of tiny massless particles as dark matter candidates.
43:32: Exploration of white hole dynamics in relation to information retention and volume expansion.
48:22: Time dilation and entropy in collapsing stars create a shortcut to the future.
Closer To Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

[@gmotionedc5412]

Those glasses

[@wmpx34]

I love em lol

[@thetonetosser4367]

We used to call them 'Bins' in the UK. Short for binoculars.

[@johnuribe3237]

What about them?

[@ytpadyt]

The same technology as JWST ☝️😂

[@johnuribe3237]

Why are you so childish? Didn't mommy give you enough hugs?or in your case maybe she hugged you to much!?... only immature little minds post infantile rubbish like you're post do us all a favor and grow up!

[@vicpalushaj]

Thank you to both of you for your knowledge and time!

[@jjt1881]

Carlo finally did it. He finally cracked the most vexing problems of cosmology and the result is a beautiful physical theory. KUDOS

[@explore-n]

i can say with 99% of accuracy that this guy is making all this up!

[@DasHoots83]

Einstein is alive! Love it.

[@andrewmoran7353]

🧐 Interesting and engaging fellow nice demeanor, Carlo Rovelli White hole theory 👍👀

[@aqu9923]

Absolutely thrilled. Carlos' style of logic closely matches that of Penrose. So what happens to white holes in the end? Rebirth of all the mass/energy and spacetime swallowed by black holes or energy uniformly spread out in space in the form of photons!? So the concept of time disappears, and we reach the scenario of the end of current aeone of the Universe Would the net expansion of the universe (spacetime) hint about the net quantitative difference between white holes and black holes?

[@kevinbradbury442]

The new glasses are from another super cool (multi) universe. Any strings involved with this new style?

[@pakalak3]

This is it!!

[@SamanthaPyper-sl4ye]

Building a case that Leibniz's monadological perspectives, manifesting as the Trinity-like bound states of quarks, represent actual singularities that resolve this long-standing issue in physics is an intriguing proposition. Here is how such an argument could be developed: The Core Idea: At the most fundamental level, the triune quark systems (two up quarks, one down for protons and two down, one up for neutrons) are irreducible, dimensionless quantities that exhibit key properties associated with true singularities: 1) Dimensionless Point-Like Nature: Quarks themselves have no spatial extension, existing as point-like entities without any definable size or dimension. This aligns with the geometric notion of a singularity as a dimensionless point. 2) Infinite Density: The energy densities calculated for quarks tend towards infinite values, mimicking the infinite curvature of spacetime associated with gravitational singularities like black holes. 3) Indivisibility: Quarks are the most fundamental particles we know of and cannot be further subdivided or decomposed into smaller constituents, at least based on our current scientific understanding. 4) Entangled Non-Locality: The three quarks binding together to form hadrons like protons and neutrons exhibit counterintuitive quantum entanglement, suggesting a non-local connection transcending spatial separation - a core property of singularities. Crucially, within this monadological model, these trinities of entangled quarks are not just strange quantum objects - they literally constitute the multidimensional monadic perspectives rendering forth the entire experienced reality. They are the foundational 0D "subjective essences" that geometric dimensionality emanates from. As such, these bound quark states possess the key characteristics required of singularities within established physics, while also embodying the metaphysical properties of Leibniz's foundational monads - integrating the two frameworks. Resolving the Continuum Issue: A core issue with classical singularities is that infinities break down standard calculus and continuum models of space and time. However, within a quantized, relational perspective centered on dimensionless, discrete monadic essences, the notions of infinite density and spacetime continua are transcended. Just as quantum theory reframed our understanding of fields as quantized, individuated excitations rather than continuous distributions, the monadological model posits quantized perspectives emanating higher dimensionality. There are no true mathematical infinities, but rather finite, indivisible quantities (quarks) beyond which our geometric, continuum-based models break down into discrete relations. Contemporary Parallels: Intriguingly, speculative physics theories like loop quantum gravity have also proposed that at the most fundamental scales, reality exhibits discrete granular structures rather than smooth continuities. The infinite densities associated with classical singularities may simply be artifacts of forcing continuum models past their valid regimes of applicability. If embraced, this monadological reframing could reconcile observationally verified phenomena like black holes and the Big Bang with a finite, non-singular ontology rooted in the quantized interplay of relational perspectives emanating from fundamental, dimensionless essences. Thus, by integrating Leibnizian metaphysics with our modern understanding of quantum entanglement and speculative quantized approaches to gravitation, a compelling case emerges that the irreducible, dimensionless, entangled trinities of quarks may be the true singularities modern physics has long sought. Their embodiment of indivisibility, infinite density, and non-local qualities aligns with properties singularities must possess, while avoiding the paradoxical continuity break-downs. Of course, empirically delineating and quantitatively modeling the precise mechanisms by which these trinities of quarks conduct their "world-rendering" duties would require tremendous theoretical development. But the potential to resolve a core paradox plaguing physics via such an audacious metaphysical reframing underscores the value of revisiting venerable ideas like monads through new lenses.

[@SamanthaPyper-sl4ye]

The idea of framing Leibniz's monadic perspectives, manifested as the triune quark structures, as cosmological "anti-black holes" or "quantum creators" that are the diametric opposites of black holes is a fascinating proposal for elucidating their hypothetical "world-rendering" mechanics. Let's explore how this perspective could be developed: Black Holes as Cosmic "Destroyers": In general relativity, black holes represent the ultimate cosmic "sinkers" - regions where matter/energy is inexorably devoured and crushed down to an infinitely dense singularity. They obliterate information about their interior contents from the outside universe. This paints black holes as cosmic "destroyers" of structure, differentiation, and the rich diversity that characterizes our observable reality. Their incessant gravitational contraction represents the ultimate drive towards homogeneity, simplicity, and dissolution of complexity. Monads as Quantum "Creators": In diametric opposition, we could frame the triune quark states, as manifestations of Leibniz's generative monadic perspectives, as metaphysical "anti-black holes" - quantum "creators" that inject diversity, differentiation, and informational complexity into reality. Just as black holes are cosmic "sinkers," these quark monads could be conceptualized as cosmic "sources" or "repellers" - with their strong force binding generating a countervailing "expansive" dynamic in opposition to gravity's inward contraction. Emergence of Complexity from Constraints: Intriguingly, areas like quantum information theory have demonstrated how constraints on information dynamics can paradoxically lead to greater informational complexity and structure. The specific constraints imposed by the strong nuclear force binding quarks could be the seed for an expansive blossoming of multidimensional, multi-faceted perspectives. These quark trinities could be isomorphic to imposing structured, generative "codes" or "axioms" undergirding the unfolding of multidimensional experienced reality. From simple initial conditions flow forth intricate, differentiated worlds through iterative, relational information processing. Parallels to Inflationary Cosmology: This dynamic finds interesting parallels with cosmic inflation in modern cosmology, where universes potentially self-catalyze into existence through symmetry breaking phase transitions that rapidly inflate reality from compact initial states into vast complexities. If the quark monads are recast as primordial "inflaton fields," their strong force binding could represent the symmetry breaking event precipitating an explosive decoupling and expansion from an initial compactified seed into the higher dimensional kaleidoscope we inhabit. Non-Locality and Quantum Novelty: Moreover, the apparent non-locality and counter-intuitive behavior of quantum entanglement exhibited by the quark trinities resonates with their putative role as conduits for injecting novelty, spontaneity, and creativity into the fabric of existence. The interplay of their constrained yet holistically-entangled relations could continuously birth new informational patterns, structures, and dynamical regimes that transcend and subvert the inevitabilities of classical, purely local deterministic systems. Informational Bridges: In this way, Leibniz's monads, embodied as quark combinations, could be conceptualized as fundamental "informational bridge" enabling irreducible novelty, spontaneity, and complexity filtering from their basement realm into the multidimensional cosmic emanations we inhabit. Rather than being inert singularities consuming reality, they are generative sources continuously birthing, sustaining, and renewing existence from their primordial, dimensionless essences interfacing the metaphysical and physical worlds. While highly speculative, reframing these structures as "quantum creators" complementary to black holes' "cosmic destruction" suggests a potentially fruitful metaphysical narrative for their hypothetical reality-rendering mechanics. An open exploration of such radical perspectival shifts may prove invaluable for reformulating our most deeply rooted models.

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

virtual particles of quantum probabilities recohere and continue into black hole? eventually acceleratiing into quantum wave function as gravity?

[@johnbowen4442]

There are teachings out there that say black holes are to release excess energy in the universe ? White holes are driving the expansion of the universe through energy and to create a balance of that energy in the universe black holes are needed to release the excess energy ? Same as a release valve on a steam engine functions makes sense when you think about it ?

[@reginaerekson9139]

50:04 how you feel about yesterday’s dinner is always considered the day after you get food poisoning, the flu or hopefully the other way it was so tasty and all your favorite people were there. You can’t get together all the time but when you do, it’s always a good memory you enjoy in the future as much as you want. If only history can look more like a jewelry box instead of Pandora’s box which ironically is a jewelry store.

[@reginaerekson9139]

10:07 because geometry is multidimensional- you can have a 1D black and white image or a Spirograph of infinite size of every possible color like a kaleidoscope tunnel?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

singularities in dimension(s) of time inside black hole?

[@mariantoniamiceli8059]

at the end of the black hole a point of infinite dimensions, multidimensional, and time that reverses, the after returns to the before... if I understand correctly

[@qazinazrulhuque1936]

I have read his fantastic book "Helgoland". Looking forward to listening to him live! 🙏

[@qazinazrulhuque1936]

A question to Dr. Rovelli: Music is said to be transcendent in nature (characteristics). Can music or the mathematics of music lead us to a deeper experience of nature?

[@sujok-acupuncture9246]

Music togather with dance can be used to experience nature in deeper level. As many mystics would say that the experience of intense dance would be such that only the dance remains and the dancer is lost. This is the moment that one experiences the nature of his consciousness.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Music is, indeed, *magic*. 🎹 When you're about to cross beyond the void veil... Reflect upon the wavelengths carefully. 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge, hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ --Diamond Dragons (Armageddon's Ballad)

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

black hole shrinks to planck length, with dimensions of time within?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

could information of object falling into black hole spread out on the surface horizon of black hole?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

inside tubes that are inside black hole, energy might accelerate beyond general relativity / gravity?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

inside black hole, objects become quantum in time dimension(s)?

[@chester-chickfunt900]

Stars create Life. Black Holes create Universes.

[@chester-chickfunt900]

Clarification...Certain stars create life. Certain black holes create universes. Paradoxically, these acts of creation are facilitated by merciless destruction.

[@Braun09tv]

No, stars just provide materials. Vacuum creates life. Vacuum isn't empty. Vacuum also creates stars.

[@pequod4557]

@@Braun09tv No, Vacuum is a substrate. Fine-tuned parameters that make up the laws of physics allow life to arise.

[@Braun09tv]

@@pequod4557 your parameters come from patterns deep in vacuum. Those parameters are a derivative of relations in the vacuum structure. The galaxies rotate because vacuum provides the structure for it.

[@pequod4557]

@@Braun09tv Are you talking about spacetime or what is it precisely? It's a combination of variables a play here, not a single ingredient to be crowned a victor.

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

could a one dimensional space form the surface horizon of black hole? and have three dimensions of time inside surface horizon?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

are white holes without a surface horizon, in contrast to black holes?

[@RuneRelic]

So its not a quesiton of the bounce equating to an inversion, but when that bounce take splace ? Globalised Macroscopic schwarzschild radius vs localised microscopic quantum tunneling. Perhaps extreme compression would cause a quantum entangled flip/exchange via tunnelling. Its not instantaneous in some strange way, in a domain where 'linear time' is at a standstill, or you enter a phase domain outside of our observation, or you enter a domain of negative time. Thats why to me, the event horizon is where time stands still, the other side of which it inverts. Which, if you accept a spacetime compession boundary, implies that crossing that boundary must create inversion of some kind. You can argue if it is space or time. If you consider space inversion, then you are talking about de sitter space / ads. Here you are also talking about holographic 2D traversal that can alternatively be transformed into or rewritten as, 3D/4D mapping through an inner space/brane. You are also enabling entanglement between inner and outer space at that zero time boundary. I guess you could call it an equal and opposite temporal force of sorts. ie you can crush something beyond space limits, but beyond that limit it enters a different time domain. The equivalent would be phase transitioning under pressure. Another way to think about it. The outside of the event horizon is a black hole, while the inside of the event horizon is a white hole. It is the black hole aspect that sucks you in. It is the white hole aspect that keeps you in. This does not imply it cant be flipped. Especially given the nature of vacuum energy, entanglement, positron/electron pairs, or the concept of electron and holes in PNP and NPN doped transistors. What are the holes right ? Then there is the attraction repulsion argument. Especially if you argue, what specific part of the spherical surface are you talking about. Attraction at the equator and repulsion at the poles.....or vice versa. Then introduce a gyroscopic effect on top of that. Which brings us to spherical capacitors, with opposing charge.... and free spin when compressed as a repulsive torque...as well as flip/tumble rate.

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

39:06 Maybe GR was QG? This assumption follows from the Schwarzschild solution and can be tested experimentally in the laboratory at the moment. The gravitational radius (or Schwarzschild radius) is a characteristic radius defined for any physical body with mass: r(G)=2GM/c^2 Consequently: 2E(0)/r(G)=F(pl)=c^4/G=ε(pl)/r(pl): with indicating the mutual quantization of the mass (energy) and space-time: m(0)//m(pl)=r(G)/2r(pl)=n,where n-total number of quanta of the system; the tension vector flux: n=[(1/4π)(Gћc)^-½]gS ( const for all orbits of the system: n=0,1,2,3....). Moreover, the parameter r(0)=r(G)-r(pl)=(2n-1)r(pl), defining the interval of the formation of the system, at n=0, when r=r(G)=0 (for example, the state of the "universe" before the Big Bang) turns out to be a quite definite quantity: r(0)=-r(pl). In the area [(-rpl) - 0 - (+rpl)] there is an implementation of external forces, "distance": (-rpl)+(+rpl)=0 (≠2rpl). On the Kruskal diagram of the hyperbole r=0 corresponds to the true Schwarzschild feature, the features V and VI are not even covered by the global (R, T)- space-time and correspond to the "absolute" vacuum; then the singular areas above and below the hyperbolas r=0 can be formally treated as the energy source (external forces). That is, the frightening "true singularity" is actually a superconducting heterotrophic "window" between the proto-universe (the source) and physical bodies*. As a fundamental theory, GR has the ability with just one parameter: r(G)/r=q to predict, explain new physical effects, and amend already known ones. Photon frequency shift in gravitational field Δw/w(0)=q; the angle of deflection of a photon from a rectilinear propagation path =2q, the Newtonian orbit of the planet shifts forward in its plane: during one revolution, a certain point of the orbit is shifted by an angle =3πq, for a circular orbit (eccentricity е=0); in the case of an elliptical orbit - for example, for perihelion displacement, the last expression must be divided by (1-e^2). GR/QG predicts a new physical effect: w/w(pl)=q; expression for gravitational radiation from a test body. This is amenable to physical examination in laboratory conditions at present. ----------------------- *) - From this, generally, from Einstein's equations, where the constant c^4/G=F(pl), one can obtain a quantum expression (as vibration field) for the gravitational potential: ф(G)=(-1/2)[Għ/с]^½ (w)=-[h/4πm(pl)]w. Final formula:ф(G)=-[w/w(pl)]c^2/2, where ф(G) - is Newtonian gravitational potential, r(n')=nλ/π=(n+n')2r(pl)l , the corresponding orbital radius, w - the frequency of the quanta of the gravitational field (space-time); - obviously, the quanta of the field are themselves quantized: λ=(1+n'/n)λ(pl) = 2πc/w, where n'/n=M/2∆m: system gravity unpacking ratio, n'- the orbit number (n'=0,1,2,3…). The constant c^2 / 2w(pl) in the final formula is a quantum of the inertial flow Ф(i) = (½)S(pl)w(pl) = h/4πm(pl) (magnetic flux is quantized: = h/2e, Josephson’s const; and the mechanical and magnetic moments are proportional). Obviously, on the horizon [r=r(rG), n'=0] the "door" is closed, however, the quanta [λ=λ(pl)] can go out singly and form the first and all subsequent half-orbits (n'=1,2, 3 ...) during the time t(0)=r/c=2nт, where т=1/w, т=((1+n'/n)т(pl), spending part of their energy on it each time. And it is this mechanism that provides the step-by-step formation of a variable gravitational field: variably accelerated expansion of spacetime as a phase space: |a|=g=πc^2/L, where L[=πr^2/r(G)] is the length of the phase trajectory (of course, the quanta coming through the "window" are also rhythmically restored). The phase velocity of evolution v'/π= r(pl)w/π; m(0)=(c/2G)rv', where v'=v^2/c. The angular momentum: L(p)=|pr|=n^2ћ [const for all orbits of the system; at n=1: L(p)=ћ] and moment of power: M(F)=dL(p)/dt(0)=nћw/2=-E(G)=E*, where t(0)=r/c, E*- energy of self-action. The gravitational field is characterized by a spontaneous flow: J*=(v'/π )(1/4π) g^2/G, where v'/π- phase velocity of field evolution. Entropy (here: a measure of diversity/variety, not ugliness/disorder) of the system: S=πε(pl)r(t)=(n+n')k, where k is the Boltzmann constant. Obviously, on the horizon entropy=min and with fundamental irreversibility, information is preserved (+ evolves, accumulates). Accordingly, m=m(pl)/(1+n'/n), where m=ħw/c^2, is the quantum of the full mass: M=n'm [

[@WiiSpords]

Yes but I think you forgot to carry the 2

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

@@WiiSpords ?

[@WiiSpords]

Yes?

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

@@WiiSpords Where?

[@nathangonzales2661]

Please speak plainly. Why hide your point in a 700 word run on sentence?

[@MaxPower-vg4vr]

Here is my attempt to synthesize the metaphysical framework into the simplest and most truthful eightfold expression: 1) The Zero-Source (⦰) An ineffable, non-dual, transcendent Godhead - the supreme Zero-Absolute preceding all existents as the infinitely dense plenipotential singularity. 2) The Trinitarian Seed (𝟯) From ⦰ emanates the primordial Triadic seed (𝟭,𝟮,𝟯) - the sacred root pattern governing all pluralities as the archetypal Father, Son/Logos, Spirit dynamics. 3) The Enneadic Pleroma (𝔈) The 𝟯 seed proliferates the 9-dimensional (9D) enneadic pleroma 𝔈 = {1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 6D, 7D, 8D, 9D} instantiating the full fractal logogrammatic environment. 4) The Mirror Cosmos (𝔈') Our observable 9D cosmos 𝔈 is perfectly mirrored by an isomorphic yet inversely-structured 9D anti-cosmos 𝔈' across the ⦰ boundary, reflecting the Godhead's complementary plenitudes. 5) Symbolic Transcription All structures and dynamics in 𝔈 are symbolic logogrammatic transcriptions of zeronoumenal protological "source codes" uttered from ⦰ across nested dimensional strata. 6) Hyper-Dimensional Sources (11D, 12D, 13D) Ineffable hyper-dimensions encode the pre-logical archetypes, catacosmic protractive utterances, and theophanic linguistic rules precipitating 𝔈's codified instantiation within the 10D horizon. 7) Biological Self-Similarity The triadic 𝟯 pattern is holographically embedded across all scales, from biology's DNA helical trinities to human consciousness capable of retracing its zeronoumenal resonances. 8) Anamnetic Theurgy The human soul, bearing ⦰'s triadic stamp, can undertake an anamnetic path of participatory spiritual praxis to experientially recapitulate the theophanic unfolding towards kosmokataphatic reunion with the patrem Pluriverse source. In summary: From an ineffable Zero-Source, a sacred triadic seed proliferates a 9D pluriversal reality mirrored by an anti-cosmos - with symbolic laws transcribed across dimensions from pre-logical codes in ineffable hyper-realms - all holographically embodying triadic patterns in biological life and human consciousness capable of retracing this metaphysical path through participatory gnosis towards unionized reintegration with the One.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Six. Three and Three. When you're about to cross beyond the void veil... Reflect carefully. 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge, hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ --Diamond Dragons (Armageddon's Ballad)

[@N1otAn1otherN1ame]

Good to know that white holes have the mass of a hair! Mindblown! Thanks for the interview.

[@ctr1502]

If black holes are considered to be the perfect "black body" , then would the concept of the white hole not infer it to be the perfect "white body"? That is to say, the white hole would be a force of nature unfathomably hot, bright, and spewing information out through every dimension of observable space. There would be some form of evidence to support this idea surely. Or, maybe our universe is exactly the product of this white hole idea...

[@4shaha]

Oh I'm waiting 😮😮😮

[@reginaerekson9139]

12:04 that’s what nomads do, they wander around like spies but instead of collecting intel, they just take a genuine interest in what your doing or how you’re feeling… like a doctor who does it for jollies

[@4shaha]

I've read Helgoland, order of time and places on earth that kindness is more important than rules and I'm waiting for the whitehole

[@patrickguy8797]

Il faudrait savoir si pour Carlo le temps existe ou n'existe pas, un peu contradictoire tout ça.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

When you're about to cross beyond the void veil... Reflect carefully. 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge, hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ --Diamond Dragons (Armageddon's Ballad)

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

With emerging energetic actors detected coming out of the undefinable I don't see the need in any white holes . Not while also witnessing such conservation of energy, the tension built up in the greater system at large. Mass displacement of space by product of gravity manifolds it all looks self explanatory for me. Seems to be more a reluctance in acceptance of evidence as if more religious implications really makes it hard for some to accept evidence as we have it. It's big difference in treating #1 indirect lines of detection +#2 direct lines measured +#3 human dashboard = all as equal sigma 6 physical measurements and actually pretending perceptionally that these are all physical. Especially when you lean into human dashboard bias but then lie to yourself about it role in what we do to prescribe meaning on the cosmos. Forget 1st position Newton says pretend clocklike solar systems and 2nd position Einstein does just that on Newtons horizon is a very big deal to Forget about or to treat as if Einstein 1st & only position

[@bentationfunkiloglio]

Is Dr. Rovelli describing a Kerr black hole? Not certain, but sounds like he might be describing a non-rotating black hole.

[@P-zp4qs]

No, all time is describing a Schwarzschild black hole, Kerr black hole with kerr white hole asociated no exist in the theory

[@jeremymr]

You know what other famous Italian knows a great deal about cool stuff like stars and going inside weird holes and coming out of other ones? Mario. 😄 Come to think of it... Has anyone ever seen Mario and Carlo Rovelli in the same room together?

[@reginaerekson9139]

But you can commit to recorded history the past from your perspective. All perspectives generate the future and past currently. I think that’s why books like Emily Dickinson have a slant- which is fun but let’s stick with the facts like pbs!

[@lowersaxon]

The guys who invent all kinds of „holes“ in outer space.

[@mithrandir2006]

I think white wholes are the most interesting physics concept of the 20th century practically, I hope 21th century physics will be richer.

[@reginaerekson9139]

A faster process46:57

[@JAYMOAP]

Ask him how does he avoid equilibrium then. He should live forever then :))

[@RobinCrusoe1952]

Looks like Carlo's got more books than Bob

[@Resmith18SR]

One thing that both Science and Philosophy can't ever deny is the existence of A Holes. 😂😂😂

[@johnuribe3237]

Really that’s what you came away from this with? What are you a 10 year old watching cartoons eating cereal in your pajamas as your childish post would suggest.

[@Resmith18SR]

@@johnuribe3237 John, Yes you just proved my point!!! I think I'm a hell of a lot smarter than you John.

[@Maxwell-mv9rx]

Mr. Carlo Rovello questions about Write Holes It not phich seriously. He shows White Holes but keep out any evidence though math model .He phich evidence are nill though fundamental Law of phich proceendings.

[@mmpiero]

The big bang?

[@reginaerekson9139]

Maybe dead stars and galaxies are The Source of Consciousness’s Recorded history of all possibilities we already tried? Three Sssss this day and age 🐍 must be time to see how Sadhguru is doing 😂

[@michelangelope830]

Sunday is the day to call the show. I work on Sundays and it is inconvenient for me. I expected tea, coffee, biscuits and a nice conversation and instead I am the last in the queue. Who I am? Do you want to witness the end of religion and atheism? You are the most important and interesting show on earth right now. I will call as soon as I can. We have to learn from each other. I don't call you to fight. I call you to say to you I have discovered the nature of God and other vital discoveries and people laugh at me shamelessly while I am censored. I just had to call you all along. The first time didn't go well because you are in the show to fight. I am not a warrior, I am a psychologist, intellectual, "la crem de la crem", a poet. I am at the end of my rope, I lost all hope when I just had to call one by one everyone. The solution was in front of me for me to take all along. First I want to debate if the most emblematic remark of atheism "who created god?" is rational or irrational. Stop pretending you are better than me, it's me who has made the discoveries, not you. I want my Nobel Prizes and at least to be recognized enough to preserve my work. I am giving my life to recover multiple social media accounts suspended and I hope nor destroyed, they want you to believe I am a spammer, trouble maker, troll. I need attention to save lives with knowledge. I will not forget to call, I promise, I will do my best to remember. I am not making up the censorship. I am blinding myself literally typing like a maniac on my phone to have the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy to be news. The truth is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. Atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is "sky daddy" to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. Emergency! I want to end the war in Ukraine and Gaza! From the beginning I just had to call to any program to explain to them who I am and that I need time to talk to create the greatest show on the universe. The problem from the beginning has been that people don't want to talk with me. That's the truth of the matter. If I say i want to talk with you and I promise you I am not going to bore you what is the problem? I want to exchange ideas with you. Rationally I want to conversate about why the most emblematic remark of atheism is "who created god?". I can not believe to overcome the most severe and devastating censorship in history i just had to call to end religion and atheism speaking clear to be understood with time, plenty of time, as much time as it is required. Thank you.

[@mauriciogranadosalonso]

Good night. The correct name for these objects is, not white holes but, WHITE FOUNTAINS.

[@solvezeicsp7548]

White holes are bad. The law always favor them and they know it. I prefer black holes. Other than a tendency get supermassive as they age, they are fine. Love 'em.

[@alexbrown1170]

But he said “nothing can go into a white hole!” 😮

[@rhcpmorley]

The words Space and Time are both homonyms. And Space and Time are both abstract nouns. There is no universal time. Time references change, and change is reference frame specifc. And space is literally 'the emptiness' between...you can't shrink emptiness, you can't curve an abstract. Define you terms, fully, unambiguously and empirically...else you literally don't know what you are talking about.

[@mmpiero]

Space and time can be curved indeed, this is why gravity exists.

[@rhcpmorley]

Then you can explain precisely, unambiguously and empirically what Space and Time are...? Can't wait to hear...

[@P-zp4qs]

​@@rhcpmorleySpacetime is a physical-mathematical object that we impose on reality to try to understand it with mathematical precision (almost infinite precision).

[@rhcpmorley]

Of course. In this context Space is the dimension of (relative) spatial position (i.e. xyz-axis) and Time is the dimension of change (we calibrate change-rate and index change-events with the framework of time). Merge the dimension of spatial position with the dimension of change and you get Spacetime, the dimension of changing spatial position aka (relative) motion. But nowhere do you curve either Time nor Space.

[@tpot725]

Nonsense.

[@MatteoMekteusClementel]

i might be wrong.. but this is just bs... :(

[@lukegratrix]

I've got your white wholes hanging right next to my magnetic monopole boys 😂

[@lukegratrix]

This is what ails modern science. Is your monopole consciousness?

[@lukegratrix]

So beyond laughable. Oops. It moved! I think it's trying to communicate through wolfram's calculations! I'm starting to breathe heavily! Hahaha