Great project, how does the last part pick up the lids and stack them on the upper conveyor. Its not clear please explain the technology there......
@aan53933 жыл бұрын
Magnet
@raphaelmahumane16483 жыл бұрын
@@aan5393 Thanks. So it is round or in form of a wheel there?
@andrewyates55483 жыл бұрын
@@raphaelmahumane1648 yes the inside is a rounded profile for good surface contact with the discs so they stay parallel to the radius of the wheel, or close enough to it.
@raphaelmahumane16483 жыл бұрын
@@andrewyates5548 Thank you. This is an interesting piece of technology, especially the magnet component!!!! If we were to remove the magnet component, do you think there can be something else to serve the same purpose excluding magnet?
@fifaham3 жыл бұрын
Very nice - who made this machine? What is the location of the manufacturer?
@rajaramvishwakarma92343 жыл бұрын
Ji
@ghouadnimohamed66993 жыл бұрын
السعر
@fifaham3 жыл бұрын
@@ghouadnimohamed6699 بليرة و نص - تشتريها ؟ هههه
@donnielsen12532 жыл бұрын
Case Automation Corp in Corona CA USA
@RameshKumar-mt8jg3 жыл бұрын
Nice automation
@cangzhouqijinghardwareacce68503 жыл бұрын
very impressive
@alainfiguiere73313 жыл бұрын
Je ne comprends pas le rôle de cette machine. Les couvercles sont empilés dans 2 cylindres. Ils sont dépilés, pour aller sur un convoyeur qui va les ré-empiler. Il y avait qu'a les prendre tous déjà empilés !?
@mestrysmitesh3 жыл бұрын
What will be the cost of this . 👍
@QwertyCanada3 жыл бұрын
2grand
@aan53933 жыл бұрын
@@QwertyCanada great price for such a neat machine
@morinawaindonesia3 жыл бұрын
Good
@williamhuang53293 жыл бұрын
Hanzhen harmonic drive gear , robot arm gear reducer
@AYUSHJOD6783 жыл бұрын
🚨
@yagmedical413 жыл бұрын
interested please send me a quote
@raghibbustami19153 жыл бұрын
Noise level is to much high difficult for worker .
@raphaelmahumane16483 жыл бұрын
they will have to wear ear plugs...lol sorry man.
@markmerrill59763 жыл бұрын
80/20...that will be falling apart regularly.
@donnielsen12532 жыл бұрын
We have used A lex profile system for over 25 years. Nothing has fallen apart yet
@twestgard23 жыл бұрын
Imagine you had inspection/quality control problems, so instead of addressing the problems at their source, you invested the money to buy packages of unreliable material, transport that to a different location, and then the time and expense to build a complex machine to unwrap, de-stack, convey, inspect, restack, and repackage. Is this an incredibly stupid engineer or an engineer who has a terrible boss?
@andrewyates55483 жыл бұрын
Yes, if a consistent defect showed up they would find the cause and correct it. This machine is intended to make it easy and fast to inspect every single part that comes off the production line, not just the the ones in the batches that are flagged due to defects, ALL of them.
@twestgard23 жыл бұрын
@@andrewyates5548 I get that every part needs to be inspected and up to spec, but it’s still wildly inefficient to do it this way. Do the inspection where they are made and you avoid any need for this whole mess. A complicated, expensive, extra machine that you have to pay someone to operate and for that matter it takes up space and requires maintenance and training. It’s just so simple and obvious to correct the underlying problem that is effectively ballooning into the existence of this machine. To put it another way, if your supplier can’t deliver reliable product in spec, you try to get the supplier to fix it, or you switch to a different supplier who can produce adequate quality, or you make the part in house. There’s no scenario where you let your production line include jank scab machines that paper over a manufacturing defect higher in the chain. Not with all the wasted money of packaging and shipping.
@andrewyates55483 жыл бұрын
@@twestgard2 You've obviously never seen sheet metal punch machines. They make about 500-1000 parts/min for small parts like that. You think you can effectively inspect parts that fast be my guest but normal humans can't. They split the production into multiples of these unstackers so that they are moving slowly enough to actually look at them.
@twestgard23 жыл бұрын
@@andrewyates5548 I take your point with that, but the inspection is being done somewhere, sometime, by someone, so that’s the same. There’s still an extra stacking/de stacking step in here that could be eliminated by having an adequate inspection system the first time the parts are in a conveyor belt system.
@andrewyates55483 жыл бұрын
@@twestgard2 They come out of the machine in stacks, not on a conveyor belt. I totally understand your intention to make things more efficient, I'm the same way, but because of the way the punch machines works it just wouldn't make sense to remove them with a belt.