“Catastrophic engine failure”. Southwest B737 returned to Phoenix after departure. Real ATC

[@pchris6662]

I fly SWA all the time and have for decades, and this is exactly the kind of talent and professionalism I’ve come to expect. Thanx for all you do, and ATC and fire crews too.

[@karlhungus1569]

I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you.

[@redshirt5126]

(crashing sounds) I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you.

[@BogWraith1]

And don't call me Shirley!!😎

[@jasonwillis4819]

...and don't call me Shirley.🤣

[@douglasw6474]

Roger Rodger... Over Under... under done

[@alextheis1123]

The automatic pilot….it’s deflating!

[@111456y]

I was on this flight with my 6 month old daughter and it was terrifying. Loud boom with the abrupt sound of the turbine tapering off. Some people thought they saw sparks. I didn’t personally. Glad to see the professional side of this was handled so well. No matter how rare it is I’m gonna be scared of flights from now on 😂.

[@Charlie-gs8or]

southwest flight out of PHX last year ruined me for flying as well. some type of engine failure. can barely fly now

[@isocarboxazid]

Glad you are both ok, really hard to have experiences like that. If you struggle with symptoms, trauma therapy can help.

[@constantinetzavaras7668]

I was your Captain. Thanks for your patience and remaining calm during a very stressful situation for you. Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance. Warmest regards.

[@joshuafcenters]

Did the pilots reachout to Let you know what was going on? How were the flight attendants?

[@joshuafcenters]

@@Charlie-gs8or you had an engine failure too?

[@jgilchristmusic]

These videos show just how safe air travel is with the measures in place when things go wrong.

[@rona4960]

It was safer with 4 engines

[@owenrich6235]

@@rona4960 That’s debatable, sure 4 engines is quite a lot of insurance but with modern jet engines two is plenty for a passenger jet. We still use 747-400 and -800’s here at DHL and they’re aging poorly compared to these newer 777’s. Did you know some of our 747’s go out at close to a million pounds? Again for a passenger jet there’s really no need for four engines in this day and age, the redundancies and procedures and safety measures in place are miles better than they used to be.

[@RickyisSwan]

I still don’t want to be in that plane.

[@bilyonarelifestile2226]

actually it shows how air travel is going to shit, from pilots that don’t listen to shitty ATC like that dude in Austin or the one in Hawaii, to shitty maintenance, to inherently dangerous airport layouts and systems

[@bilyonarelifestile2226]

it also shows the reluctance of US pilots to call MAYDAY or PANPAN. At most they say we are thinking of declaring an emergency.

[@cessnaflyer172]

I was flying in that day for SkyWest, they slowed us down to 190 kts when we were 100 miles from the airport. Solid work southwest pilots!

[@collectorguy3919]

Always accept an offer from ARFF to escort your aircraft to the gate.

[@foxw875]

You gotta look cool with all the flashing lights vehicles escorting you in!

[@JP-qz9uz]

Can't say enough about the awesome professionalism demonstrated by all parties involved in this episode, the pilots, the ATC and the Fire command. 😀

[@GardenGuy1942]

The plane was blowing up, nothing about it is professional

[@IgorFioli]

That captain is a true gentleman.

[@judymarlene3414]

@SpadesPlusYT58 And I’ll bet nobody ever calls him Shirley.

[@akrogirl32]

I got my PPL there and, depending on the time of day, Phoenix can be very busy. Plus, there is a lot of GA traffic, as well as traffic from the many flight schools in the area.

[@VictoryAviation]

Everyone did an amazing job, but I especially liked the clear dictation and cadence of the tower ATC. That was crystal clear. Also I'm super happy about the ground emergency incident commander repeating back to the tower what was told to him to confirm. I don't think enough ground ops do that and sometimes it makes things confusing because they aren't understanding the radio communication or the overall situation correctly.

[@YouCanSeeATC]

👍

[@rotcmaverick]

PHX controllers are some of the best in the business.

[@caseydykes117]

I wouldnt be suprised if ground emergency crew were previous highly experienced commercial pilots by the clarity of transmissions and the quality of the comms. He knew what the pilots needed above and beyond what I've normally seen before they requested. Very on top of the process and proactive in his directives/information provided. Amazing

[@SandeepSingh-ki2fp]

This is pretty standard fire ground communications amongst firefighters, repeating orders is a way to ensure the accuracy of information is received appropriately. Great work by everyone involved in this incident.

[@cupcakemcgee3175]

This video along with others show how well the aviators are trained and how well these guys and gals are under pressure. It’s not a video game and you get multiple tries. Great job!!!

[@spacecoastmed]

If I was in an emergency situation needing help, that ATC is the voice I would want to hear, hell of a job.

[@CLipka2373]

6:17 - That captain sounds like he has waited all his flight career for this one moment to say "emergency aircraft".

[@flightwife1828]

Regardless of how some feel about SWA, their pilots & FAs are the best in the business. I may be a little bias but I stand by my statement. ❤️💛💙

[@nuclearrabbit1]

Now, imagine this situation with 1 pilot onboard as Congress is considering allowing. These guys are busy.

[@equallyeasilyfuqyou]

There’s way too many pilot incapacitations to allow a single pilot, all of those would end up in a total loss!

[@Lee-n2n1t]

I don’t ever see that happening. They can try they won’t win! 2 pilots is a MUST on commercial aircraft’s.

[@johnroscoe2406]

@@Lee-n2n1t Don't put anything past this magatard congress.

[@MarcF.Nielssen]

How many flights have had a pilot who became incapacitated? How many people would have died if he'd been alone?

[@braedan51]

​@@MarcF.Nielssen I have 25 hours in DCS World, put me in coach. I'm ready to fly. 🛩

[@creamdelacreme]

ATC: “no rush, but getting a little close to the Supes, might want to start thinking about making that turn here soon” lol all jokes aside, one heck of a job by all involved. As smooth as it could have been. Love the upbeat attitude of the pilot.

[@larryfisherman6449]

Superstitions woulda been in the other direction but funny nonetheless

[@WalkingEng]

Incredibly professional by the pilots, air traffic control and emergency crews. Excellent outcome.

[@markandrews7701]

I'm always amazed at how calm everyone sounds during these situations. I understand that training takes over but I would still expect some level of stress in the voices. "...we're gonna roll this baby out as far as we can...How about we shoot for like maybe B10?" So casual in his voice. You could imagine that same tone when making plans for lunch with a friend. "Oh, let's shoot for noon at O'Malley's OK?"

[@daftvader4218]

@@markandrews7701 What is calm about calling a contained engine failure "catastrophic ". The Controller then wants to give the plane immediate return vectors. ....which are all denied with all that chat... A click bait failure.??

[@jlcsr9163]

The pilot is so calm I'd be going nuts

[@libertyforoneandall]

@@daftvader4218 It's meant to imply they won't be attempting a re-start. In our checklists it's referred to as " severe damage" but it means the same thing. The long vector is because there a number of checklists that need to be run in order to secure the engine and prep the airplane for a return at much higher approach speeds.

[@cochrancd]

@@daftvader4218 A catastrophic failure is a sudden and total failure from which recovery is impossible. The good news is they have another one, so they have checklists they are required to run before landing for safety reasons. There's no clickbait here.

[@slayer8actual]

I've noticed on a couple of these emergency landing transcripts that even though nothing dangerous or catastrophically broken was found on the aircraft after inspection by Fire Command, that the pilots always took the offer for an escort to the gate. That is some good captain work there. It would be foolish not to take the offer of an escort during taxi even if nothing is smoking or on fire, because that ONE TIME you refuse the offer, is the time the plane will explode in a ball of flame moments after the fire trucks pull away. That is how shit goes.

[@flythebus]

It's one thing to experience an engine failure in the sim. Hats off to the crew for their professionalism. Job well done.

[@georgepaiva7496]

I have to say pilots are a different breed of person unbelievable calm and control wow

[@skittles5347]

EVERYONE did one heck of a job! This makes me almost tear up with pride listening to how professional everyone was. Gosh..what an incredible job!

[@caseydykes117]

Absolute peak performance by all involved. This recording is a goddamned piece of art

[@skittles5347]

@@caseydykes117 Amen!

[@peterbondy]

Almost?! 😁

[@daftvader4218]

You must be joking. ... Just an engine failure turned into a drama with just too much chat from the ground and air...

[@caseydykes117]

@@daftvader4218 how familiar are u with SOP's?!?!?!

[@NautiGrandpa]

Southwest pilots are always so calm, chill about things. SW: Southwest 123 Tower? Tower: Southwest 123 go ahead. SW: Yeah our wing fell off may need to return.

[@clqudy4750]

😂🤣

[@EdOeuna]

His first two transmissions were utter garbage.

[@judymarlene3414]

Joey ,do you like movies about gladiators?

[@triciac1019]

​@Ed Oeuna well that is to be expected. He calmed himself down.

[@EdOeuna]

@@triciac1019 - not to be expected from a professional airline pilot. They practice this stuff in the sim enough to be able to initiate an emergency call without waffling and failing to get anything of relevance across.

[@caseydykes117]

PHENOMENAL work by all involved here. I cannot imagine the massive workload on both pilots and ATC cleaning traffic but they all got in and got it done. Also emergency crews on coms getting intentions in advanced really clearly and concise isn't something done well very often but God they were fantastic.

[@dalydegagne1839]

Great communication all around - very classy! This is how it should be done - with competence, courtesy and gratitude. Kudos to Southwest, ATC, and the emergency services for jobs well done!

[@EdOeuna]

That first call from SW was appalling. And the second. What a waste of breath.

[@daftvader4218]

@@EdOeuna Ed....I totally agree with you... Pathetic. . What is a "catastrophic "engine failure. ????

[@jacquesleroux5069]

Classy? You probably meant to say professional.

[@EdOeuna]

@@jacquesleroux5069 - utterly unprofessional and highly suspect. You couldn’t get away with that “quality” anywhere else.

[@31Alden]

Amazing coordination by everyone, executed with polite precision.

[@richardslocum3782]

Very calm and professional handling from all parties involved, nice job!

[@iowaredneck9416]

Anything can happen at any time, even with proper maintenance and prep. The key to surviving any emergency is to stay calm and move logically. This applies to any situation from a broken ankle on a hike to a car accident to flying. I will only fly southwest because of how relaxed and professional the crews are. Aside from that, their customer service and flight times are generally top rated in my experience

[@MatSpeedle]

Exactly the sort of people you want running the show all round. Superb professionalism to ensure the best outcome.

[@mikehillier6441]

I was in B737 that blew the fuel manifold on #2 engine just as we took off from Las Vegas. Took a long trip over Lake Mead and then landed. You could see a a line of fuel all the way down the runway when we turned onto the taxiway.

[@Sushi2735]

Now that was one cool captain! Love it! Calm and collected in an emergency. It allows you to think clearly if you keep it together! Bravo 🎉

[@MarinaOslova]

These guys are very professional. Thanks

[@acm4213]

Consider: the engine design contained the failure as designed, the flight crew flew the plane, navigated and communicated, and the ATC and emergency crews did their duty. Kudos to all.

[@Sharky2901]

Thanks to ATC, fantastic guys ! And the pilots of course😊

[@garethtcollins]

The controller did the usual rabbit in the headlights thing of giving an instruction, asking a question and passing traffic information all at the same time during a period of high flight deck workload. I have one basic rule when a pilot reports an issue: "Roger. Report your intentions when able". Let them fly the aircraft, they will come back to you.

[@skipwood2059]

Excellent point for training of ATC controllers.

[@jasonwu350]

Absolutely right

[@JLynchJr86]

I was the controller working next to the controller who was working this aircraft. You have to realize how many things are going on in the room. Just as chaotic as it is in the cockpit, it’s the same in the control room. The controller had five different people asking him questions and making suggestions. Telling him to get information. The controller did a hell of a job coordinating everything.

[@garethtcollins]

@@JLynchJr86 I do realise as I am a controller myself. I was just observing the startle effect which can and does happen to us all.

[@daftvader4218]

The Controller was professional and excellent. The very poor, non standard initial radio calls were totally misleading.."CATASTROPHIC !!" The failure was NOT at all catastrophic. Not a MAYDAY !! NOT an imminent threat of loss of life It was a simple contained engine failure. More a PAN call maybe as there is some URGENCY to get an single engine aircraft on the ground. This poor initial non standard communication caused the Controller to give continuous expeditious return vectors and even a nearer alternative airfield. These were all ignored !! The crew did not at all convey the lower level of theat....and just flew on for mile after mile.. with terrain issues and other traffic from which they had to be protected. An excellent professional indeed. It's the crew that seemed to be the rabbits !!! Taking ages to complete the basic engine fire check...the descent and approach check. No need to do a runway performance check with such a simple failure. Any plane can return to a runway it just departed from .... with this level of failure. ... A great Controller indeed.

[@crashsector]

FO was understandably shaken, but the INSTANT that captain got on freq this became a slight annoyance and everyone calmed down. Amazing.

[@Ztbmrc1]

"...this baby..." This captain loves his plane, even when an engine has failed. :) Good job everybody!

[@YouCanSeeATC]

👍

[@raysutton2310]

Approach controller seemed to have his act together, nice job.

[@justinlord6194]

If MVA in that area was 4,800, how was traffic approaching at 4,400 @2:46?

[@8atc8]

It was VFR traffic, not talking to ATC, they are do not follow MVA restrictions as those are for IFR aircraft.

[@neomonk5668]

Thank you for the video, it is really well done.

[@YouCanSeeATC]

Thank you for watching 🙂👍😎

[@MauriR6]

Question - Why such a long time running checklists away from the airport? Would they not want to turn towards airport as soon as possible since on only 1 engine? Thanks :)

[@constantinetzavaras7668]

The engine has to be shut down, checklists run, flight attendants to communicate the plan to, run the landing weight performance, let dispatch know, inform the passengers, and have a ground game plan in case the motor decides to light on fire when we land. Yes, I was the Captain. Great question by the way. Thank you!!!

[@MauriR6]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 Thanks for the answer. Can you estimate the time it took from the moment of the engine failure to the time you were on the ground? Just curious :)

[@ryantunison5433]

One thing to think about is that 25 miles at 160 KTS (Probably Was Going Faster) is just over 8 minutes. That 25 miles goes by fast, especially when you’re dealing with the work load that they are.

[@daftvader4218]

Hi MaUriR6 Like the Controllers you are confused by the non standard RT . That is why they keep offering radar vectors which were then refused.They even offered an alternate field. All adds to the RT load. According to the FAA / ICAO an emergency should be defined to indicate threat. This emergency was a simple contained failure with no other aircraft systems effected. The level of emergency should be defined as a.... Mayday( immediate life threat ) or a Pan (urgent) Initial call.... PAN PAN X 3. SW 9010 #1 ENG FAILURE. 126 persons .....or standby number. FUEL 25 thousand lbs Then.... SW 9010 Request radar vectors to a 10 mile final runway O8 with emergency services on standby. In my 43 years of worldwide flying I have never heard so much superficial non standard chat. Eg.. I have never heard a Captain telling ATC that " he" is flying the "baby" even.... Most pilots just call "FINALS" Not my opinion... The facts are in FAA AIM 4-2-1 c. . Goggle it..... FAA AIM And yes..... I have had 8 engine failure /shut downs especially in the early days. The last one out of Bangkok was similar to this but I had to dump 100 tons of fuel . I didn't even declare a Pan or a Mayday as I still had three left on the good old 747-400. Thank you Boeing. ..

[@daftvader4218]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 Hi...I think you will find that any runway you depart from will allow a safe return landing with one engine failure and no other failure. .

[@staceygrahame2504]

Definitely great job by way of it landed and everyone was okay so that’s a successful landing! But - I kind of don’t see the ‘brilliance’ so many have commented about. Here’s why. (Be kind! 😅) ATC handled things beautifully….. I had a few gripes with the piloting though. ATC having to point out he’d vectored them to the airport but they weren’t actioning his requests, which were as a result of their request to return asap. Was clearly a fairly ‘fresh’ F/O who understandably panicked somewhat, it just would have been helpful that someone told the ATC their intentions so that they didn’t wonder what on earth was going on. I totally get it was ‘aviate, navigate, communicate’ - it just kind of left him hanging, asking for something then ignoring his solution. Again, I assume it will have been a new F/O who in that first moment, forget they needed to do a bunch of checklists before they could bring it back in…. But still. 😅 Also, what on earth was that declaration? 😶 ‘Catastophic engine failure’ got the poor ATC going wtf and having to question them. Mayday would have been a clear and immediate declaration of a problem and that’s all that ATC need to know at this point. Now they know exactly what to start putting into motion, instead of playing detective with the guy who’s also making requests then ignoring them. And not listening properly either. 3:10 ATC request a turn of 280 for terrain. F/O mishears and confirms ‘320’. Unfortunately ATC failed to notice too and inform of incorrect read back. And don’t get me started on ‘clear all aircraft’…… the heck he thinks ATC are going to do? Radio the Citation pilot and ask him to go shake the F/O’s hand at 4000ft?! 🤦🏼‍♀️ Leave the ATC’ing to the ATC controller! Can tell the ATC was being cautious by double checking they were still aiming for the runway requested and not changed their mind without telling him. He had to spoon-feed them to get them to confirm some of the basic, essential things he needed to know. I bet the Captain needed a beer after that. And the F/O a new pair of trousers. 🙈

[@constantinetzavaras7668]

Actually, I had a BOURBON that evening.

[@TangoDelta8111]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 gives me more confidence hearing you reply and knowing such quality people are doing their best to get us to our destinations. TYVM

[@daftvader4218]

Stacy. .....I totally agree with you.. Everyone can learn how to do it better next time..and make the situation more standard ... They all landed safely that's the main job !!!

[@ImJustFunSize]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 great job captain!! 😎

[@timmytimmy17]

Question for someone familiar with aviation... The captain mentioned the first officer was flying until he took over towards the final part. Is that typical in these types of events?

[@lavender-ox8mi]

Yes it can be, the captain during an emergency is running checklists, trouble shooting, making decisions and coordinating all of the flight crew for an emergency. The FO and him are executing and confirming with one another but having the FO fly this pattern and navigate back to the airport in this case makes sense. The plane lost engines but still flys well, he set them up for the approach and the captain took over for the final phase of flight.

[@bisbonian1183]

Captain has to fly the approach, if it is single engine. Captain will often let the FO fly up until the approach, allowing the Captain to make sure all the emergency procedures are taken care of, and the checklist is completed.

[@soccerguy2433]

generally what we do in the USAF.

[@timmytimmy17]

@@lavender-ox8mi thanks for such a thorough answer!

[@timmytimmy17]

@@bisbonian1183 makes a lot of sense. Thank you!

[@kennethjackson7574]

I am reminded of the charter flight departing Mecca, Saudi Arabia, decades ago. One (or more) tire blew and was on fire when retracted. As they were trying to return ATC told them “All runways will be available.” Everything would be available if they could get back. They didn’t.

[@mikecarbiener2137]

You do a great job with these vids!

[@goringo_]

Just being curious.. I know that in case of emergency a checklists need to be run, but while they run them, is it the most safe way to actually fly away from the airport? Would not be some circling nearby safer option? Again, only curious about what the procedure is. In the end it was an amazing job safely done.

[@ghostrider-be9ek]

0:37 - PERFECT example of why a MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY call should be used - NO confusion and 'say again' from ATC. Mayday implies SERIOUS immediate emergency. NO ambiguity. WHY does the rest of the aviation world understand this?

[@saxmanb777]

Because the US doesn’t train it like the rest of the world. It’s really that simple.

[@jetdriver747]

Correct, I cringe when I hear this absolute nonsense on the RT. However safely down which is the main thing I guess.

[@cageordie]

Right. There's a way of communicating an emergency and it's written in blood. First thing is to demand attention and priority by saying MAYDAY three times. Not once, or never, or dropping in "emergency aircraft" or setting the transponder to 7700 in the hope ATC notices. Expect runway 8? LOL! The MAYDAY aircraft tells you what its doing and what help it needs. And you stick MAYDAY on the start of the calls, not emergency aircraft on the end. ATC keeps approving, but in an emergency they aren't being asked, they are being told. But you won't get any love for telling them they aren't doing it right, so long as things turn out OK in the end.

[@N1120A]

You think the controller didn't understand this was an emergency?

[@antoineroquentin2297]

@@N1120A not just the controller need to understand it, but everybody who is on the frequency.

[@kellykathymcdaniel7834]

Why do some controllers ask for fuel in time, some weight, some gallons, etc?

[@gshenaut]

Listening to the communications between the fire crew and the pilot made me think of a question. English being the language of international aviation, ATCs in non-english speaking international airports are expected to be able to communicate with pilots in “aviation English”. But what about the emergency ground crews in those airports? Do they too have to learn at least some English?

[@freedomfan4272]

Hmm thats not Ernie on the radio aka flyingwithbigern. He posted a video a few a week or two ago saying he was going Burbank. I think he did two trips to burbank and then flew back to PHX as a passenger.

[@mikeL5183]

My first thought when I saw the departure airport!

[@williamwallace9427]

It was not “big ern”

[@seanwhite7532]

Wow! How incredibly professional and cool that captain and FO are! Yes, I know they train, and yes, I know there are procedures, but if those guys were not ahead of the airplane for even a second, all Hell could have broke loose. And when the captain jumped on the radio, he talked as though he was ordering from a menu.

[@SiliconValleyHighValue]

Whatever that pilot eats for breakfast…I’m eating it!!! Dude was hella calm!!

[@bunglejoy3645]

How many engines do a passenger plane have and what likelhood for all engines to have catastrobic engine failure what would cause it

[@GH-oi2jf]

Commercial passenger planes always have two or more engines. They must be able to fly on one engine well enough to get down safely after an engine failure.

[@valerierodger]

@@GH-oi2jf slight correction: not only must they be able to fly, they must be able to continue to climb

[@mikec5992]

So what does an announcement to passengers look like with something like this? Do the pilots explain what is happening?

[@LB-zc1hj]

Very professional, can someone answer this question please …mayday mayday in an event like this is always used to gain attention in the Uk does it not apply in USA?

[@mrhoffame]

Total pros!!! Thanks for doing such a great job getting us around safely!

[@YouCanSeeATC]

👍

[@ricardokowalski1579]

After Flight1380 Southwest pilots are not messing around 👍 Curious what indication prompted the " catastrophic" label. Was it a VIB engine vibration reading? and/or they also felt the airframe rattle? Not mentioned: Fire, oil loss, fuel flow, loss of thrust, ITT or EPR out of limits. In any case, loss of an engine in climb is enough reason to go back every day of the week, and twice as appropiate on a Fryday.

[@soccerguy2433]

startle factor for a new (les experienced?) FO?

[@RLTtizME]

Yes yes and yes and yes and yes you answered your own question.

[@ricardokowalski1579]

@@RLTtizME Thanks. 👍

[@williamwallace9427]

737’s don’t use epr

[@lharris428]

If you Google "southwest 9010" you'll see an uncontained engine failure. The engine didn't just fail... it tore itself apart.

[@flobie1kenobi]

Runs some checklists? What point does the checklist say get back within gliding range of the airport?!

[@williamwallace9427]

It doesn’t. Gliding range? You obviously don’t fly jets

[@poker_18rs92]

I love the calm demeanor of the captain….. I’d fly on his aircraft anytime.

[@ailivac]

Once it has a new engine, that is

[@constantinetzavaras7668]

I was the Captain. Hope to see you sometime!

[@daftvader4218]

Not for me or my worldwide world class seven star safe airline. As rated by Skytrax

[@jamescraig3121]

Great job by the crew. Simple question why is it that US pilots shy away from the international communication of emergency or distress. Saying Mayday X 3 or Pan-Pan X3 would taken care of a lot messy back and forth. Once said, they know your situation and will keep you clear of traffic and terrain and you’ll have priority.

[@daftvader4218]

James... Non standard jargon that is not the required professional standard... FAA AIM 4-2-1C

[@daftvader4218]

Makes you wonder about SW training standards....sounds like the first engine failure they ever had... Don't they get them in the SW simulator every six months. ..

[@peterjones7562]

AIM 6-3-1c

[@roylavecchia1436]

I am a former jet engine mechanic with the Marines during the 1980s, and then with TRAMCO in Everett, WA. At TRAMCO I worked on many SW Airlines planes. One of the biggest red flags to me while working at TRAMCO was that there was no tool control at all. Mechanics purchased their own tools and no inventory of tools was performed at the end of the shift, so if a mechanic dropped a tool somewhere in the aircraft or engine it would not be detected. In the Marines we would verify that every tool was accounted for to avoid such an incident. A loose tool somewhere in the airframe or engine could be catastrophic.

[@Jmotwa87]

So amazing to see how well this was handled. As scary as I’m sure this was, it makes someone like me, who really dislikes flying, feel better about it. Catastrophic engine failure seems like nothing my bad endings. Really good to see this.

[@gorak9000]

All twin engine planes can fly a surprisingly long distance on just one engine. One engine failure is scary, but not that bad overall. 2 engine failures... you're going to be having a bad day

[@joncoulthard9028]

I know and agree with all the comments on here but for all the guys in the cockpit were fully tasked they really didn't need to be further tasked by ATC to look out for the Citation? Surely ATC could have just redirected it without adding to the guys workload?

[@JeremyEllwood]

Th at captain was SO CHILL.. So yeah we're gonna roll this baby out to, oh i dunno... how about B10? LOL

[@adamw.8579]

Planned taxiway for clearing RWY.

[@TheNameOfJesus]

The words at 8:37 were "there's no smoke or anything coming from Engine One right now."

[@royal9848]

Sometimes you hear controllers that talk a lot, pilots are busy during emergencies. This controller was good, just spoke what was needed. The pilot was like a lot, laid back and cool, the first officer was excited.

[@kepeliwa]

What's your vector Victor?

[@masheroz]

What is it with US ilots and not using "mayday"?

[@rocky3993]

Wish poster would provide information on the details of the cause.

[@ShainAndrews]

Well junior... go dig through the report yourself.

[@benjambreeg]

doesn't ATC normally ask for specific details on the nature of the emergency? like what exactly was the 'catastrophic' failure?

[@You.Tube.Sucks.]

No time. They need to know what the pilots need. ATC can't solve engineering problems. Pointless waste of time unless there is something known like an active fire.

[@jasonkirkland1304]

@@LazloNQ As a former flight instructor Aviate - Navigate - Communicate. - We drill that into you every time you go into the air

[@judymarlene3414]

But did anyone ask if Joey had ever seen a grown man naked?

[@daftvader4218]

All the Controller wants to know is MAYDAY (immediate danger of loss of life) or PAN (urgent situation ) and he will adjust the level of control. PAN PAN X 3 #1 ENG FAIL.. There is no other damage...it was a contained failure. No big deal !! FLY....and the Controller will navigate you if you then request a 10 mile final to runway 08. If you don't use standard worldwide statements you get a situation like here. The poor Controller giving return vectors which are ignored and offering alternative fields which are ignored. Cuts down all the totally unecessary totally non standard verbal rubbish and distraction . In a foreign country they would just not understand you.. They obviously didn't in the good old USA.

[@daftvader4218]

@@jasonkirkland1304 Exactly Jason COMMUNICATE. But do it in a standard way that indicates the level of emergency you are experiencing. Not like here. So non standard and confusing. Check out FAA AIM 4-2-1c Fact not my opinion. ...

[@RonPiggott]

And there is a push for 1 pilot in the cockpit? Wow

[@HapyLLIuTeJIb]

Yeah, that's globalists crap. Hopefully never gonna happen, as lots of their other "inventions" (15 minutes cities/ghettos, food made of insects, CBDC to name a few).

[@deew7014]

Unbelievable to me need two at all times imo

[@joshuawilliams5006]

That’s the third Southwest 737-700 to have a Number 1 Engine Failure after 1380! Or did I miss one?

[@MetalTeamster]

FO sounded a little rattled but not overwhelmingly so. Couple read backs were incorrect. Good experience, the Capt sounded like he let him handle ATC throughout most of it as a training experience

[@constantinetzavaras7668]

Bingo! I let him fly it and told him it would be a great experience for him and I ran the checklist. I had to do the landing by company policy. Textbook and outstanding training. We knew exactly what to do and with a positive outcome. Great work by everyone involved.

[@daftvader4218]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 It was not text book ... The RT was totally non standard. Eg Captain's side motor. You mean ...Number one engine. Never heard a Captain tell ATC who was landing the aircraft. !! Most just call FINALS. Please read the TEXT BOOK. FAA AIM 4-2-1c Facts not my opinion. You obviously don't listen to anybody......

[@wokeupandsmellthecoffee214]

Great teamwork to all concerned, textbook precision. Great content as always You can see ATC.

[@blackjackAY]

Watching these videos and seeing how ATC and pilots deal with emergency situations only makes me feel more comfortable and safe as a passenger. Obviously, these situations are rare, and the professionalism and stoicism show how well trained they are. Also, if you're scared of flying, consider the stats of driving fatalities compared to flying fatalities.

[@patrickallenbowen]

Why did the Captain hand off control of the aircraft to the co-pilot right before landing? Seems like odd timing.

[@wyc4934]

Mate this radio recording is so clear, like 100x clearer and most other ATC and plane radio recordings out there. In reality is it going to be full of noise or is the radio communication as clear as this video?

[@BRUtahn]

I'm confused. The ATC says min vectoring altitude is 4800 ft but then says there's traffic ahead at 4400 ft... is this because lower altitudes are permissible for a controlled approach?

[@hetherjj1]

Most likely on a published approach or visual into KPHX if they were opposite direction and not being vectored

[@YouCanSeeATC]

4800 was a minimum vectoring altitude and Southwest was flying IFR. Probably opposite traffic was flying VFR.

[@8atc8]

That is correct! It was a vfr aircraft not talking to ATC.

[@dshack4689]

Genuine questions for any actual airline crew - During the high workload of an emergency, I don't understand why ATC bombard you with questions like "souls on board" when surely they could get that info from the company and let you concentrate on your already high workload? And wouldn't fuel onboard also be known via the company? Or even the flightplan? Only ask you if they can't get it themselves, and keep the comms super short with "let us know when you have time for some questions" instead of listing off all the questions in the one comms? Isn't the mantra aviate, navigate, communicate? And to clear the other aircraft so that the emergency aircraft is only having to sight traffic that is beyond the local ATC's direction? The ATC in this recording sounds like he's thinking while he's talking instead of thinking first, prioritising only the barest information essential (like minimum safe altitude for terrain). I'm not being critical, all the above is a question from me not an assertion. I have a massive respect for ATC and I'm a huge believer in systems; I'm trying to learn not argue =)

[@8atc8]

This is a compressed audio of the events and not real time. Trust me many other aircraft were also on frequency but because of the compression it makes it seem like I am asking a question every 5 seconds.

[@dshack4689]

@@8atc8 absolutely context changes with the time compression, totally agreed. my question centres around isn't the PAX on board available via the airline rather than adding to pilot workload? and doesn't the flight plan or at least the company paperwork show fuel onboard? Its like CRM principles - offload non-core tasks to someone else that's available. I'm not arguing that this should have been done, I'm asking if in future this could be done? always total respect for ATC, each pilot might be talking to one ATC but each ATC juggling so many at the same time.

[@uditabhattacharya2824]

the change in the tension was very noticeable when the captain took over the radio

[@MagMan4x4]

they got it repaired and sent back out 3 days later! awesome.

[@ajs11201]

Everyone seemed to be on their A-game, and I especially appreciated ATC who seemed to go above and beyond.

[@MightyRob1]

Question for the group: What are the checklists they need to run? Why not land as soon as they can? Why fly 25 miles out on one engine rather than turn in closer and land as soon as possible?

[@constantinetzavaras7668]

First, as the Captain of this flight, we had to maintain aircraft control, and establish / review the initial flying game plan which we had briefed prior to the flight. Shutting down the engine first and foremost with the Quick Reaction Checklist and memory items. The First Officer was given control to fly and talk to ATC. Imagine them seeing us stopping our climb and leveling off / descending. I communicated with the Flight Attendants, Passengers, Dispatch, and then ran the actual long checklist in the Quick Reaction Handbook. It includes the engine cleanup items, air conditioning system (think smoke prevention here in the cabin), turning on the auxiliary power unit and generating electrics on the "bad side", performance data (we are heavy weight and need to calculate brake cooling etc). I need to also hear what the flight attendant sees on the wing. For example, the explosive sounds, initial yaw, overheating, bells and whistles get your attention. Had it separated? Etc. Then it's a base turn and establishment of the final approach and getting back to help the First Officer configure for landing. By policy, i must land the jet in a single engine situation. We also had to descend from 15000 feet. That took some time. Mind you, if we were on fire it would have been quicker and with a faster configuration to lose altitude and energy as we would have dropped the gear for drag. In this case, we could have been in a bad position taking the immediate turn when there is time to handle and run checklists. The jet flys fine on one engine. Developing a ground game plan (potential evacuation) must be communicated as well. We don't want a passenger playing hero and blowing a slide open if not necessary upon landing. Fire trucks encroach very quickly on an emergency aircraft. In this case, I brought the jet right to the fire equipment by rolling it out with little braking. They would have put out a fire instantly. But you always have to be prepared to evacuate and on which side it must be done for the safety of the passengers when the fire department is putting out that fire. That is on the fligjt attendants and they must maintain the control of our passengers. Lots to discuss, and a great question. The Captain.

[@MightyRob1]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 Thank you! I appreciate your time to explain as it gives a much more complete picture. When you said you needed a long roll-out I immediately thought of braking without thrust reversers (actually, do you use thrust reverser on the single side engine landing?) but I forgot about fuel load/landing weight. My question also stemmed from ATC asking a couple times if you were ready to turn, as you were low over dense population areas, so it seemed weird to declare emergency but then take (what seems like a long time) to line up to land. You always hear “we gotta run checklists” but it’s not really clear what those are any why they take so long. I really appreciate the straightforward answer without you being offended by the question-Thank you Captain

[@sfmc98]

@@constantinetzavaras7668 Can we just acknowledge that the captain of this very flight is apparently participating in the comments here? That's pretty cool. One of the things that I really appreciated was the direction to ATC as to what you were going to do. I've noticed that British pilots are very directive during emergencies as well, which is _the way it should be._ In many emergencies it's almost as if the pilots are seeking assistance from ATC or allowing ATC to basically fly the plane. You are in charge because you've got to land safely. I think it's actually better CRM to simply tell ATC what you need. It's an emergency, they don't have a choice.

[@cyberentomology]

Odd flight number here and not coming up in the usual places… charter/ferry flight?

[@credence7777777]

captain was almost having fun at the end :)

[@YouCanSeeATC]

😁

[@ryantunison5433]

“Tower, scratch B10. We’re taking B9 and going to swing by Starbucks for a coffee before going to the gate. Can we get you anything?”

[@janeosborne165]

I got goosebumps listening to how well everyone performed.

[@relentlesscactus]

Especially the engine, for failing so cleanly and not throwing parts into the fuselage or catching fire. Thanks, engine!

[@daftvader4218]

@@relentlesscactus Yes!! What IS catastrophic about that.

[@jemand8462]

they have the airport in sight at 5000ft 25miles away from it? is this even possible?

[@maanmohammad8459]

Second time in a short period excellent job by the Phoenix ATC

[@BigBear48]

I was on a plane taxiing in when this emergency aircraft landed and got to see all the emergency vehicles drive out to it. Was pretty cool.

[@You.Tube.Sucks.]

Yeah, watching a fire trucks go to a plane in case it blows up & people are burned alive is pretty cool. I'll bet you rubberneck by MVAs too. I treated a bunch of patients whose limbs were blown off when two pieces of shit bombed my city's annual marathon -- you know what I didn't think? "This is pretty cool".

[@eltomas3634]

​@@You.Tube.Sucks. Everything okay at home, bud?

[@ihateusernamesgrrr]

@@You.Tube.Sucks. Sounds like you need some time off work to chillax a bit my guy, the comment wasn't that serious, and nobody was hurt. Everybody needs a break, we all burn out, and burnout sucks dirty old balls, it can seriously wreck you if you don't get on it immediately.

[@richardlacey4923]

Ava also thinks he’s Ethel merman

[@mixeddrinks8100]

@@You.Tube.Sucks. mate you know that is not what he/she meant.

[@edgeg.708]

Now, that is how trained expert professionals respond to issues! BRAVO!

[@brentsummers7377]

I heard the fire crew say everything looked as it should on the L/H engine so at least it did not blow off the front of the engine cowling...

[@gchsbus]

That Citation was making me crazy. You think ATC would tell that Citation to get the hell out of the airspace temporarily, such as, "Citation N8543B, we have an emergency aircraft with engine failure. They are currently above you at your 1 o'clock. Please temporarily vacate Class Bravo airspace and turn right heading 360 without delay."

[@morganghetti]

You can't just start turning aircraft into other aircraft and terrain because someone else is an emergency. You have no idea what he had around those two.

[@gchsbus]

@@morganghetti You are correct that i had no idea but you sure can turn around everyone. That Citation was clearly a hazard for a plane in emergency because it was "sticking around". The ATC should have given instructions to the Citation, any instructions, to get the heck away from that plane. Seemed no matter what was going on with the emergency aircraft, here comes that Citation put-puting around. I am surprised the Citation did not land on the taxiway next to the runway at the same time the emergency aircraft was landing. Seemed that Citation was literally attached at the hip to that emergency aircraft. I know if is was me in that Citation, i would have requested vectors out of Class Bravo to hold until everything was figured out. It was almost like the emergency aircraft was getting an escort by the Citation. Great ATC here but that Citation needed to be anywhere but there at that particulatr time. An emergency aircraft with an engine failure should not need to keep looking around for other aitcraft jurking off in the airspace.

[@cassandratq9301]

Agree. Have no idea what SOP is, but getting that Citation out of the range of the SW's airspace seemed prudent but wasn't done. Felt like SW had the same opinion.

[@auburn587]

Is the captain @flyingwithbigern? Sure sounds like him!

[@HapyLLIuTeJIb]

Is "catastrophic engine failure" the right term? Cause, thankfully, there were no fatalities and even the nacelle seemed to be intact.

[@FlyingMaxFr]

Catastrophic means 'sudden great damage' so I think it is not meant to indicate here something more important than that. Indeed just indicating that the engine is down and cannot be restarted.

[@RLTtizME]

Yes and why not.

[@dalydegagne1839]

​@@FlyingMaxFr Makes sense if not sure whether catastrophic or not to declare as such in case it is.

[@rotcmaverick]

Probably heard a large bang and gnarly vibrations. That's enough to run the catastrophic engine failure checklist. Doesn't necessarily mean uncontained.

[@EmotionalWeather]

MAYDAY

[@le_th_]

As the ATC controller keeps talking to the First Officer, I keep thinking, "take a breath, calm down, and *let the man run through his emergency landing checklists*". I appreciate the ATC controller's clear voice, brief messages, and his presence of mind to ask for fuel and souls on board (in case of a crash, they need to let first responders know how much fuel will burn and how many bodies they need to account for). A solid, professional job by all parties. Just another day in the commercial aviation industry.

[@mk88200]

Well... the pilot(FO I'm assuming) said "catastrophic engine failure clear all aircraft". Then the airplane proceeded to fly another 20 miles west. So I'm assuming that is why the ATC didn't take a breath, he assumed they were turning in immediately based on what the pilot said.

[@8atc8]

Also you have to understand that this audio is compressed. There were many other aircraft the controller was working at the same time dealing with the emergency.

[@NeuroDeviant421]

Why do they give fuel “in time” rather than fuel in volume? It seems the fire rescue folks on the ground would be more concerned with volume of accelerants rather than total flight time.

[@williamwallace9427]

Because that’s how the faa tells us to tell atc

[@hotmetalslugs]

Due to the unskippable ads at 4:00, I had to stop the video. No way could I get back into the gripping story after that Ritz commercial. I assume they just couldn’t make it. RIP.

[@benjaminlewis671]

An abundance of caution by the fire crew and pilot. Makes me feel safe, because these guys knew the #1 engine could catch fire and kill people.

[@fomfom9779]

The reality of these situations always gets to me, when they ask about the number of souls onboard.

[@judgemarshall6127]

It's just part of the profession..... In my 32 years of flying I've heard those words directed to me in my headsets "Say souls onboard and fuel remaining in minutes" for a total of 5 times. Fortunately for me and pax all were uneventful. 😎👨🏽‍✈️✈🌍🏆

[@fomfom9779]

@@judgemarshall6127 I understand that. But it brings into focus they aren't just talking about a flying tube made of aluminum and composites.

[@judgemarshall6127]

@@fomfom9779 I too understand what you're saying...... When those words come directly out of the mouth of an ATC and are meant for you they are indeed instantly presumed Nonchalantly Cold, Uncomfortably Methodical, and Seriously lacking Empathy or Emotions as to the severity of the possible outcome of the flesh, bones, and life source of those occupants aboard. However, believe me when I say..... "It reminds you and makes you instantly remember that We play for keeps Up Here and you may not get a second chance....so do Everything as if your life Depends upon your next action and subsequent ones because They Do". 🎯👨🏽‍✈️✈🌍

[@wobblybobengland]

Do they really say 'roll this baby down' on coms?

[@YouCanSeeATC]

😁

[@daftvader4218]

Only in Hollywood. ..

[@jayytee8062]

Awsome ATC. Awsome pilots.

[@LockheedStarliner]

So much for the MADAY or PAN call..