Celestron 10X50 Vs Vangaurd 12X50 Vs Skymaster 15X70 Vs Nikon 16X50 Binoculars - Which is the Best?

A side by side comparison of Celestron 10X50 Vs Vangaurd 12X50 Vs Skymaster 15X70 Vs Nikon 16X50 Binoculars.
#nikon
#celestron
#vanguard
#binoculars
Celestron Upclose 10X50 Binoculars: amzn.to/3X5ihOI
Vangaurd VEO ED 12X50 Binoculars: amzn.to/43O4o9J
Celestron Skymaster 15X70 Binoculars: amzn.to/43QjHi1
Nikon 16X50 Binoculars: amzn.to/3Njk4MO
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This video is for educational purpose
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Music : Steps by Anno Domini Beats
Source : KZbin Creator
License : free to use

[@umer111wani6]

Without saying a single word,you resolved the delima of first time binocular buyers.

[@science_sir]

You're welcome 🙏

[@emopunkrockerepr]

very well put. This - is quality work!

[@fauzulazim2993]

This is THE BEST review I've ever seen, Other KZbinrs talk a lot of trash and BS but here we are given actual vision. Thanks mate! 👍

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@larrydunn4626]

7:22. look at the stairs coming down on the left side of the 4 story building. With the Celestron 15x70 you can't even tell they're stairs... now look at the nikon. you get actual stairs.

[@strangerous1313]

Now look at the price tag.

[@larrydunn4626]

@@strangerous1313 yes, stairs are not cheap.

[@meenayadav5922]

All the stairs become visible Great Deductive skills u got there

[@ananda3166]

Indeed Nikon is the winner

[@AhmadFauzi-pd2tb]

I can see stairs too in celestron g2 10x50 , whats your point? This comparison cant be used as benchmark

[@farhankhan8938]

Excellent video. The best way to compare the features of different binoculars. This video has resolved my problem of buying the right binoculars. Many thanks.

[@science_sir]

Many thanks 🙏

[@Sir-Kay]

I currently own Nikon 12x50 Action EX & before I got this I had the 16x50 ones, have you noticed massive light reflection issues around the edges too due to the Multi-coated lenses as opposed to Fully Multi-coated that is supposed to eliminate that issue?

[@garyjones2582]

I have a smaller pr of Nikon's... They have great optics...

[@davidmorley7417]

Best example I've seen, now I know what I'm looking for, I'm a biginer, thank you 👍

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@evercarranza6863]

Me encanta de la forma en la q está explicado todo ,otros solo enseñan por fuera pero no demuestran lo q puede hacer el producto,

[@karamchand2211]

All Nikon models are best

[@delanglo2]

Nice test, thanks a lot!

[@science_sir]

You're welcome. God bless 🙏

[@emopunkrockerepr]

very good video. quality work. thanks a lot!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@elliotguerro7612]

El mejor video con la mejor explicacion de lo que cada producto ofrece. Yo uso los Celestron y me encantan pero creo que voy a comprar los Nikon. Muchas gracias por el video.

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@tdapple1]

My goodness. Absolutely beautiful Review. Thank you 🙏. Nikon 16x50 is in a league of its own. WoW.

[@DieTabbi]

Why?

[@elmoribeiro]

Do you find the 12x50 too unstable to use without the tripod?

[@Bender-Zadunaysky]

Был у меня Nikon 16X50 это лучший бинокль что у меня был. Просветленная оптика, в сумерках видно как днем.

[@aleksandrmorozov2678]

Какое стекло у бинокля,соответствует ли BAK 4?

[@theicebreaker1198]

Excellent content

[@IqbalLone-bm2bj]

Canwe adjust zoom?

[@Arklei]

Excelent video! Congrats mate!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@ananda3166]

Superb view from nikon 16*50 its worth the money. But is it true more magnification brings less light to the object. I am confused between nikon 10*50 and 16*50. Dont know which one to buy. My purpose is just casual watching, plane spotting and yeah at night for astronomy. Can you please suggest. Thank you

[@DarkAnonimOfficial]

16×50 by Nikon

[@sachinmore8938]

Awesome!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@anjachan]

thank you so much for the video and beautiful place in india. 💛

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@anjachan]

@@science_sir I ordered the skymaster.

[@science_sir]

All the best :)

[@Mas_JeEN]

Link harga?

[@ahmetkizmazz]

because its have extra ıphone 11 zoom ??

[@suddhashilmukhuty8836]

Nikon the best

[@yingcracker7513]

wow~ it very COO!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[@py3ltk]

Deduzo que o skymaster 25x70 deva ser interessante... tirando o peso

[@Jaberfra1]

Que bueno seria la relación de precios

[@swashington942]

200/1

[@GILSON300LBM]

Nikon é muito show de bola mas aqui no Brasil custa uma verdadeira fortuna 😢

[@juanmanuelJG]

¿16x50 es mejor?

[@rehanchaudhury2017]

How far is the distance ?

[@Noah-we6hm]

6.5 km or 4 miles

[@billlee2361]

Nikon 16X50 Binoculars best.

[@diwakarlohani5686]

Yes

[@jasskaur-uw2sr]

Nikon. 16×50.prize

[@tourjak]

Top.... 👌👌👌👌😎

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@user-hy9is3rz7g]

Ну что я понял, по краям картинки, ни на одном бинокле, качества нет.. и особенного ничего нет и по середине... А так в общем нормально... Представляю диссторсию по краям, если смотреть в оба окуляра, если в один и то, уже замыливания видно...

[@tahaiqbal427]

Was it really 6.5 kms straight line distance?

[@Joao-um2fc]

well, if not a straight line, it was still longer than 6,5 km, use trigonometry to find that out

[@ujwalapawar5990]

❤

[@hudson8074]

The 15x and 16x times looks like they were shot during an earthquake

[@mainmchoonjoismeayaahoon8922]

Canon is the sharpest?

[@joseramirollanosparrales8761]

En los últimos dos hace el acercamiento con el celular es falso que se vea así de cerca no queremos que nos engañes asta se ve que le acerca con el teléfono

[@TheLiveNature]

Hello , nice sharing , i liked this 👍 , new subscribe +🔔 & full watching 7:44 🎬, have a nice days ♻️☘️🍀✅🌳

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@huseyiny1358]

Greetings, I have a question for friends who are experienced in this field. As an amateur, I enjoy watching nature and the sky. To start, I was torn between Nikon Aculon 10x50 vs 12x50. Which one would you recommend and under what conditions?

[@user-fk5fh5dr2x]

اريد شراء كمية❤❤❤

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@sarthak6556]

Can't see any Fujinon binoculars in the comparison. Could you add them for a better understanding of the best ones?

[@user-kp4qm4gg1e]

Между 10 крат и 15, разницы не большая.

[@yuri_russo]

То что вы видите в 15х, вы увидите и в 10х. Изображение будет чуть меньше и меньше мелких деталей будет видно. В 15х хорошо видны автомобили, на 10х они едва заметны. Если в 10х можно наблюдать с рук, то в 15х желательно иметь штатив. Для панорамных наблюдений лучше 10х и меньшей кратности, для точечного наблюдения 15х и выше. Чем больше кратность, тем меньше поле зрения.

[@user-kp4qm4gg1e]

@@yuri_russo благодарю.

[@luispatricio5919]

Entre 10 e 15 vezes, você não nota diferença ??? Eu cá noto uma grande diferença. 🤔🙄🧐🥸

[@luispatricio5919]

Façam um teste com os Pentax Júpiter 16×50. 🥸

[@science_sir]

I will definitely try 🙏

[@luispatricio5919]

@@science_sir 😁😸🥸🙂

[@vadim_248]

👍👍👍👍

[@science_sir]

🙏