I can't understand how can't you see a difference in picture between these two scopes? Hawke is visible sharper, more details can be seen. Less blur on enges.
@davidaearthy4 жыл бұрын
I agree, I took screenshots of the tree from both of The scopes to compare them. The Hawke is much sharper in my opinion. Also, wait till the light starts to drop and see how much you can see with that $100 scope... that objective lens size will make a huge difference in the amount of light. It’s simple physics.
@emmadaigle96033 жыл бұрын
He did say... to each his own.
@davidaearthy3 жыл бұрын
@@emmadaigle9603 yep, and I said “In my opinion.” If you wanna cheap out then it’s a personal choice. Just don’t expect to get anything the same and with a PCP, that think will rattle its self to pieces over time. Also, the light that think takes in will be minimal so your going to notice it when the sun starts to dip.
@Esoxlucius513 жыл бұрын
@@davidaearthy I agree with you,i was given a new remington springer c/w a centre point 3x9x40 on it,utter crap,could` not unscrew the eye bell enough without it falling off,so i bought a 3x9x40 a.o hawke for £70 uk.works perfectly. I wouldnt put a C .P on ANY of my pcps.
@airpowered22352 жыл бұрын
@@davidaearthy You obviously don't own a PCP or you'd know what you just said was just Dumb. PCP's don't rattle, your break barrel rattles. Don't comment if you don't know what your talking about.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Let it be said before anyone comments about accuracy....with the Centerpoint scope in this video I split playing cards and did bottle cap challenge @100yd with a Ruger 10/22 22lr ...1 shot
@Bob_Adkins4 жыл бұрын
Absolutely love my Centerpoint 4-16x50. It's bright, has Mil dot, AO, and is very rugged. I've shot 1000 rounds through a nasty springer and the POI has not changed. If it can take that beast, it can take a 300 Win Mag.
@keithwilliams88074 жыл бұрын
I have one and I love the reticle in the clarity on centerpoint is just so good
@man350z3 жыл бұрын
Where's the video? Talked cheap.
@STKO20113 жыл бұрын
@@man350z kzbin.info/www/bejne/eWmbgKBrbLCmoqM
@STKO20113 жыл бұрын
@@man350z kzbin.info/www/bejne/rmOWpKl4jreHkKc
@jadoncramer65123 жыл бұрын
If you look close in this video, look at the top of the electric pole. The object on top is clear with the Hawke and blurry with the Centerpoint.
@airpowered22352 жыл бұрын
I see what your talking about but, would you pay almost $200-$300 difference for a pellet rifle? I don't shoot mine at 600 yards. I do shoot just over 100 yards once in a great while but, at that distance it's not worth it to me.
@damsb.60783 жыл бұрын
I tested a Centerpoint scope on my friend airgun and I was quite satisfied by this little scope, I was quite surprised in fact to see all these negative reviews about this brand. Of course it's airgun and not a 'big caliber' but for the cost I think Centerpoint doesn't look like a bad choice. BTW I'm not an expert, so I think it clearly depend on which kind of gun you will install it.
@matrix51754 жыл бұрын
I always like to use my own quality mounts and rings to mount my scopes so I never use the rings that are provided with the scope anyway so that's a none issue for me in purchasing a rifle scope.
@2wheeleddemon9995 жыл бұрын
I've put a lot of food on the table with a center point scope. 120yds is the farthest shot I can take at my place and I only use 7.62x39 and 300BO so it works out well for me.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Right on!
@russnurse2b8074 жыл бұрын
I bet they were both made in the same factory. There's a way to do a little research and you could find out.
@mibi29994 жыл бұрын
I was going to make this exact comment. This happens with designer jeans, low and high end jeans are made at the same factory for under $5 a pair, then sold at the retail store for $40 and $400 respectively. It's a SCAM! 😂
@diawaprolite79672 жыл бұрын
Pretty much
@redrider864014 жыл бұрын
ok, since when does price dictate quality ? anyone ever use a .18 cent P38 can opener ?
@gunfather835 жыл бұрын
Good comparison man. Even though the you dont see a lot of differences in the clarity of the 2 in broad daylight where you will see a huge difference is at dawn and dusk. The higher priced scope will let in a lot more light due to the difference in coatings of the glass and the arrangement of the lenses inside the optic. The higher priced scope will also have a more durable coating that will last far longer than the 99$ scope. They are both made at the Light Optics factory in China I'm sure and you can order a scope made to whatever spec you desire from them. You are also paying for more precision tracking in the turrets of the more expensive scope. You know me man I'm a scope snob so I pay a lot of attention to these things. Hey btw next month they harvest the fields down here if you want to come down and check out the new rig I just built.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Right on! I'll definitely plan for it
@CHOPERUS235 жыл бұрын
Those Center Point scopes look exactly like AGS scopes, they're crap too.
@jeremywill42724 жыл бұрын
It's sad we don't make anything anymore just imagine all the jobs if we made all of our own stuff here in the US
@pmang64 жыл бұрын
these would be 2000$ optics if they were us made. Our entire consumer economy stops making sense if we stop importing cheap goods.
@yaakov45494 жыл бұрын
I think we just like to rip our citizens off like we do with the pharmaceutical industry same pills in the Philippines cost 10 dollars but over here it 200. We can make our on stuff and charge a fair price, but the greed of our corporations won't let that happen. They have us thinking its the democrats or the Republicans fault, but in reality they both do the work for the lobbyists and we will continue to fall for it.
@ussling5 жыл бұрын
I have had a Crosman Nitro Venom break barrel with hardwood furniture for maybe seven or eight years now, with the included bare bones Center Point scope installed. For what it is, it does its job very well. A couple years ago I wanted a scope for my new Ruger 10/22, which I no longer have. I went to the gun and pawn shop in town to see what they had. I looked out the store window to across the street with each scope. Ho hum, all the same. Then he handed me a used Nikon. Wow! It was like HDTV! Nice as the Nikon was, I couldn't justify a used scope that would have cost much more than what I had paid for the rifle. I put a $30 Tasco on it before I sold the rifle some time later. Good video.
@rstlr732 жыл бұрын
nikkon is awesome though, had one , wish id kept it
@richardjones21515 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video buddy :-) I notice that the HAWKE that you have has the "AMX" style reticle.....This made me wonder if that particular scope from HAWKE is one of theirs that is rated (mechanically) for spring-piston air rifles. If so, these scopes are build to withstand the repeated harsh mechanical recoil characteristic that would cause many lower-end scopes to fall apart internally....that 'could' explain 'some' of the additional cost maybe
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@brettking28004 жыл бұрын
I agree. Videos on you tube support your hypothesis.
@brettking28004 жыл бұрын
Comparing apples to oranges
@petertomas36653 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Airmax series are specifically made to withstand the kicks of spring airrifles. Vantage series for example are for more general use though they are made for springs too but Airmax is obvious will last longer since they are more durable for that purpose.
@richardjones21513 жыл бұрын
@@petertomas3665 I ended up buying a Hawke Airmax for my entry-level remington springer rifle soon after watching this...I love the scope ....no regrets:-)
@bblossom1005 жыл бұрын
Good call bro. In the market for a scope for my Gamo Swarm Magnum right now myself.Looks like a pretty good match. Thanks for the heads up!
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Appreciate it thanks for watching!
@harrysmith35024 жыл бұрын
I wonder how/if the cheaper one tracks back to zero after playing with the adjusters?
@sunnesonne3 жыл бұрын
Lol it probably doesn’t
@PiperX1X Жыл бұрын
Having some high end pcp’s and springers a while ago I picked up a cheap workhorse springer for £50 which is a hatsan mod 90 in 177 and I’ve been meaning to get a cheap budget scope for it and today I was in a U.K. shop called cash converters just browsing and my eye caught this Center scope 3-9x40 scope which was still with its box and looked unused and it was up at £25 so I took a chance on it at that price. So I’ve mounted it and zeroed it and it’s doing a cracking job. I’ve only got it dialled in at 25 yards but it’s putting pellet on pellet and I must have put over 100 shots through it and given the gun a knock or two to see if it’s holding zero and it is no problem at all. It’s a very clear scope and at that price for what I need it for it will do the job nicely.
@ManMak64 жыл бұрын
First of all just because both scopes are made in China does not that they are made with equal manufacturing techniques and materials. I have the very same CenterPoint. I shoot a lot and after using the CenterPoint for about 4 months, the adjustment turrets got loose and sloppy and the scope was not holding zero anymore, let alone track. I also have some Hawke, MTC, Aztec, and Athlon scopes that I had for years and they work just as well as when I first installed them on my rifles. Quality becomes apparent over time. You can also tell quality when you pick up a quality piece. Center Point is for casual shooter who keeps his rifle in the closet and brings her out once of twice per year!
@kevinpercival280z10 ай бұрын
I bought the center point scope. I agree there might not be much of a difference if the scope actually works properly! I bought mine directly from crosman Canada and the windage and vertical turret adjustments don't even work. Zero customer service and now I'm stuck with a piece of crap.
@LINAS_ALWAYS_2STEPSAHEAD4 жыл бұрын
I have a gamo swarm Maxxim went threw 3 scopes before I took the gamble on a center point, so far 1000+ pellets threw her and scopes still zeroed
@donwilson3504 жыл бұрын
All I know is only time will tell in the Hawke Scopes have always been known for giving top performance and long-lasting they have might have better internal parts in the Hawke then the center point scope the center point scope might look good but it could easily fall apart if it's not made as well as a hawk I have always use Hawke Scopes and they have always worked well for me right out of the box
@phillipmendiola12575 жыл бұрын
Now that was a great comparison review JAMES very intristing , all my scopes are less than 200 dollars and just as clear one of them is a Centerpoint on my 270 Rem never gave me any problems .
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks man!
@johnvall92014 жыл бұрын
I'm in the same boat I have 2 centerpoints one on a 30/06(same model in the video) and a 4-16x40 on my 7mm wsm haven't broke the scopes yet or any issues
@ohshoot4443 жыл бұрын
That Hawke is much clearer! But, $300 clearer I’m not sure. Thanks for the great video boss.
@headcrackersilentsniper91114 жыл бұрын
If you look in the distance past the 500yd light pole at the tree line you will see the difference in a $98 piece of glass compared to a $400 piece of glass. Not even comparable!
@michaelb.421123 жыл бұрын
Hi James. I'm looking forward to the video. We know Cyclops Joe HATES Centerpoint scopes. I know he was talking about the $50 one in particular, but maybe the $100 CP scope is better. If they are made in the same Chinese factory, that's a whole new discussion.
@redrider864014 жыл бұрын
I have a Center Point 3-12x44 MOA Lock Turret on my 30-06 and it shoots just fine
@sunnesonne3 жыл бұрын
Depends on how much you shoot it and at what distances, if it’s a 3 shot per year hunting rifle, sure, it’s ok
@Howardtripper4 жыл бұрын
The thing is how long will thi last on a springer air rifle
@markhaworth29935 ай бұрын
Dose the Counterpoint also come with a life time warranty ?
@edledoux2788 Жыл бұрын
It would be very helpful to show the 2 views side by side for a direct comparison. Some still frames of several images would be nice too, especially if the gun were sitting in a rest, to avoid camera shake.
@nicepojos8766 Жыл бұрын
Great ideas.
@yannisbossis71533 жыл бұрын
The view from the Hawke airmax seems a bit more crisp. Nothing spectacular though and definitely not at 4x the price. How much total adjustment (elevation and windage) does the Centerpoint has?
@kohnfutner96374 жыл бұрын
When you shoot it, maybe you'll find a difference?
@CyclopsJoeVideos5 жыл бұрын
Nice Video James
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks Joe appreciate it!
@CyclopsJoeVideos5 жыл бұрын
@@STKO2011 Me and You good from Now in Bro !!!! Zero Doubt
@liquidsteel5 жыл бұрын
I think the next step is, does it Hold and Track like Cyco Joe test them on his video ?
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
@@liquidsteel I wouldn't use it if it didn't....with the Centerpoint in the video I've split playing cards and bottle cap challenge @100yd with one shot from 22lr 10/22 so it definitely tracks and holds zero
@Robbydhjr Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video and thank you for the great idea of putting a plumbing coupling to make a scope camera🤣. I just got that centerpoint scope on clearance at Walmart for $39 and this video gives me great hope the scope will be decent!
@Georgeolddrones2 жыл бұрын
You did not mention the lifetime guarantee with the Hawk scopes .Hawk every time 👍
@williamevans21762 жыл бұрын
The Centerpoint I purchased has a lifetime warranty also.
@flavius224 жыл бұрын
1. Thanks for the review 2. Many ppl have rings. They dont like to pay for new ones everytime they buy a new scope (dont imagine they come for FREE they are INCLUDED. 3. Clarity cant be the same. Hawke is expensive EXCEPT for vantage series but they have awesome tracking and awesome glass. 4. You need a better camera sorry i know its expensive and everyone is on a budget. 5. Thanks for reading. Ah. 6. Hawke covers with worldwide waranty EVERYTHING except theft and intentional damage. Would i pay 400? No. Just making a point. But if i went to some competition? Maybe.
@larrywalden62610 ай бұрын
why would you mot done a shot comparison between the two on accuracy?
@MrDirtysteve754 жыл бұрын
So how did they hold up to recoil? How about the turrets? Are the clicks solid or mushy? Do they hold a zero? I have a old Simmons that looks good but cant hold zero to save my life.
@Steve-Cross Жыл бұрын
I think it’s probably down to its durability and build quality. I think the Hawke is fully waterproof, and either argon or nitrogen filled. Also, the reticle isn’t as detailed, for distance, shooting, as the Hawkes. It is nice they make cheap scopes, for novice shooters, though.😊
@rick318695 жыл бұрын
JAMES ,LAST YEAR ,I WAS AT A WALMART SEVERAL CITIES FROM WHERE I LIVE ,I SAW THEY HAD 6 OR 7 OF THESE SCOPES ON CLEARANCE FOR 25 A PIECE SO I PICKED UP TWO OF THEM. I WENT HOME AND PICKED UP A FEW AIR RIFLES AND WENT TO MY FAVORITE SPOT !!! ,AFTER QUICKLY ZEROING THE TWO SCOPES SEVERAL TIMES ON DIFFERENT AIR RIFLES I FELT SO BAD I DIDNT PICK THEM UP LOL . THESE SCOPES OR REAL NICE AND CROSMAN LATER HAD THEM FOR 150 ON THEIR SITES ! WELL LONG STORY SHORT ,I WENT BACK A FEW DAYS LATER TO HOPEFULLY GET THE REST AND THEY WERE GONE !!!!!!!!!!!
@lancestanford2265 Жыл бұрын
Would you happen to know much moa adjustment does the center point has I just bought 2 thanks
@breakingmoney30773 жыл бұрын
Problem is with both of these is durability. How do they stand up in a truck or car on a gravel or dirt road. Quality is key. In any scope.
@vansantsam3 жыл бұрын
All lenses, no matter if they are scope lenses or camera lenses are at their best at only one distance and one setting.. 95% of my shooting is between 30 and 50 yards, occasionally 75 to 100 and rarely beyond 100.. So if a scope is clear for me between 30-50 yards, even if it only cost $40 that is the one I would use..
@Backin_Theday3 жыл бұрын
Have you found a good flip up scope cover that fits the back of the Center Point well? If I spend $400 or more on an Optic it's going to be American made Leupold.
@gmanneod80855 жыл бұрын
Hay James I'm looking at buying a $100 scope and considering this scope. Can you tell me about the tracking of the scope? Also is the visual opening easy to acquire? I wish you had covered these two areas for the negative Nancy's out here who always try to find something to criticize. Thanks for the great video!!!
@jacman11114 жыл бұрын
I just bought a bug buster for a summit np2. Should I send it back and try my 3 by 9 center point first? Thanks
@Mr_Boomstick_.30-064 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. I am buying a Centerpoint 4-24×44 to play with at the range. I hope to ding steel at 500+ yrds, so thank you for confirming that a budget scope is just as good as the high dollar scopes.
@STKO20114 жыл бұрын
Glad to help
@joshjamesguitar4 жыл бұрын
Except it really isn't I've spent more on cheap ass scopes and ended up just buying one decent one. Clarity is one thing, but the holding zero and consistent clicks/values and adjustment range is a whole other thing. Especially when shooting longer range. Cheap 24x scopes have 36 MOA adjustment, meaning if you're shooting 100 yards with a .22lr you run out of adjustment and can't zero it without a 20 Moa mount. Mid range have 50-65 this Hawke probably have 80 ish with the zoom it has.
@STKO20114 жыл бұрын
@@joshjamesguitar depends on the shooter, I'm not just the average either
@joshjamesguitar4 жыл бұрын
@@STKO2011 Not really if the scope doesn't hold zero or have consistent clicks or a good adjustment range lol
@STKO20114 жыл бұрын
@@joshjamesguitar ever thought maybe shooter error of it not holding zero? There's a big difference between knowing why it's not holding zero or just saying it's not...just because the shot/group isn't where you zeroed last doesnt really mean anything...alot of variables at play...cant, tilt , slant if you didn't measure...scope/eye alignment ...I can keep going but point is people say alot of things and I end up seeing what they're doing wrong ....I can also read targets and tell you why your group is doing what it's doing
@tasaman5 жыл бұрын
Most any scope looks good in bright sunlight. A low light test is where more expensive scopes pay off. That 300 might buy you a extra 4 or 5 minutes of shooting light. If you don’t need that, save your money.
@bennymanzo8023 жыл бұрын
Would it be good on a PCP rifle?
@camilogaston32284 жыл бұрын
Wich scope do you recomend me for 200-250usd with 4-16x44 or 50 aprox???
@neehooya4 жыл бұрын
STKO, thanks for the video. Went and got the scope, it’s a big improvement over my UTG. A question for you, which parallax wheel did you use? I can not find anything that fits. Let me know, thanks.
@STKO20114 жыл бұрын
Utg 30mm 3-12 x44 wheel
@martinpy14 жыл бұрын
Where can I buy it?
@KalimbaSpirit4 жыл бұрын
I have the CP scope and its Awesome but is it tough enough for a spinger?
@oscarvillalobos24534 жыл бұрын
How good are the center point 4-12 x 40?
@ausgunroy16872 жыл бұрын
I'm almost convinced this in an ad for Chinese Manufacturing, given how many time you've said 'Made in China'.
@coryjenkins41795 жыл бұрын
Both nice scoops. I have never had any issues with Center Point to be honest.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@mattio79 Жыл бұрын
Despite the clarity, the Centerpoint drifts when used on an actual firearm. Mine is going in the bin. Going with a trusted brand.
@tooks15094 жыл бұрын
Hawk is a pretty good grown-up adult scope.centerpoint is some cheap garbage that Walmart sells mostly for BB guns and airsoft
@RAM-195 жыл бұрын
Great vid......do you think a decent centerpoint scope would hold up to a fully tuned magnum .177 Springer???have ate 3 scopes in 4 months...
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks! The individual sold CP scopes are rated for spring Airguns ...my question is though what pellets are you shooting? Same ones or always switching reason I ask is cause I studied break barrel vibrations and found shooting low resistant pellets are what caused scope damage
@RAM-195 жыл бұрын
@@STKO2011 I am using crosman piranha 10.5 grain.....they are shooting around 1100 fps on crono.....they very accurate in my gun....it is a crosman fire n.p.....I did a crap load of custom work to including custom GAS RAM....sanded barrel....cleaned up compression tube and barrel crown.....sanded seal...brass washers in barrel...r.c. bearing and screw in trigger....Moly grease...gun is a evil tack driver when it's not eating scopes....prob. shot 6000 plus rounds through it....looking for a bulletproof scope....lol
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
@@RAM-19 might try a Diana bullseye, are you using one piece? I use a Hammers 3-9x40 air Magnum scope my Crosman NP...the scope is a tank
@RAM-195 жыл бұрын
@@STKO2011 one piece mount....have been thinking bullseye mount....thanks for help...love the vids...watch all the time....keep them coming...D.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
@@RAM-19 no problem!
@Mr_Boomstick_.30-064 жыл бұрын
Correction...6-24×44!
@dandetande2885 жыл бұрын
Can we have a link for that specific scope, the center point one? And will you recommend a scope like that for my Benjamin 392s? Thanks in advance
huge difference lol.. the hawk is crystal clear compared to the other. you must need glasses
@briandady90304 жыл бұрын
I would say for the price difference the light transmission is better but not 4 times better. $ for $ if it lasts the less expensive optic might be the better value.
@daveremillard62574 жыл бұрын
No kidding. I dang near lost it when he said the cheap scope was crystal clear. Do you still believe the Easter bunny lays colored eggs?
@greg61624 жыл бұрын
Center point is usable and certainly more than enough for Air rifles but once you get out to longer distances there is a BIG difference in optics. Also check the POA and POI in that Center Point after a few shots and then you’ll see where your money went. You get what you pay for. A lot of ppl spend more on optics than the gun
@Leonardokite5 жыл бұрын
I noticed the Hawke had a battery compartment. Does it have an illuminated reticle? Either way, I cannot imagine that being worth 300 bucks LOL
@richardcampbell57625 жыл бұрын
The Hawke scope has an etched reticle and it does light up red and green.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
I didn't go into too much of specifications...but like I mentioned in the video both are similar both have etched reticles
@noahway133 жыл бұрын
Because of technology and use of robots, manufacturing is getting better world wide. I'm old enough to remember when MADE IN JAPAN was considered cheap crap. Now it is a sign of quality. Stuff made in China, with western supervision, is slowly turning the tide. I have several Leopold scopes, Bushnell, Barsika, and CP. I don't see much difference in any of them, not stuff that the general public would care about
@STKO20113 жыл бұрын
yep!
@kohnfutner96374 жыл бұрын
It's like the difference of watching TCL and Samsung. 😏 That's why I bought a TCL for half the price.
@richardcampbell57625 жыл бұрын
Good video brother. But I'll stick to my Hawke scopes. I've never had any luck with Center points. But I'm sure there are some good ones out there. 95% of the Scopes made are from China.... And if they say American-made. I guarantee they probably have Chinese glass in them. Good video brother Shoot Straight stay blessed. 👍🇺🇸🇺🇸✌
@Fister_of_Muppets5 жыл бұрын
Agreed, most scopes are made in China these days. Most glass is Chinese, some of the better ones use Japanese glass (Nikon, SWFA, etc). But I also would rather spend $X on a scope and have it all go into the scope rather than get "free" rings with it. I know who makes good rings and who doesn't.
@richardcampbell57625 жыл бұрын
@@Fister_of_Muppets I definitely agree brother.👍🇺🇸✌
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks...I just looked up my other scopes and my Nikon Prostaff is from Phillipines and Bushnell Trophy is from North Korea
@Fister_of_Muppets5 жыл бұрын
@@STKO2011 But the glass in the Nikon is imported from Japan. Not sure about the Bushnell, possibly Chinese glass. Still good though.
@calbrabandt59675 жыл бұрын
Chinese glass? Leupold is the only company that's honest about it in saying that they have to use Chinese glass, because there's not a sufficient glass supply elsewhere in the world to even fill their orders! Sad, but I believe them.
@Leonardokite5 жыл бұрын
Just checked it out. You failed to mention one really important point. Lifetime warranty! That's pretty hard to beat. I was a little soured on Centerpoint Scopes when I got one with a Walmart air rifle. Of course they have to give you the absolutely cheapest one they can make. So I discount that as not typical of their normal scope.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Yeah the bundled scopes definitely don't justify their better scopes
@aronkoppold398118 күн бұрын
I wouldn't pay 400 for a scope that was not made in America myself
@mikein2105 жыл бұрын
Awesome video I got that CenterPoint on clearance for $25 that wheel makes it look really cool need to get me one
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@rodneykent80234 жыл бұрын
I'll stick with Hawke they are superior to Centerpoint in every way. It's not about how good you can see through them. It's about how they perform and how long they last. Hawke scopes are made to last I know this firsthand.
@MrLex872 жыл бұрын
Both scopes are made in china, Your not gonna see a big difference in quality buddy.
@rodneykent80232 жыл бұрын
@@favidjenden3612 They make Hawke scopes for all types of budgets though. I wouldn't dare choose a Centerpoint over a Hawke even if I had to sacrifice magnification or whatnot. I'm not knocking you for picking up a Centerpoint but I guarantee you could have found a Hawke within the same price range.
@aronkoppold398118 күн бұрын
I've had pretty good luck with the center point scopes myself
@JeffB19613 жыл бұрын
thanks for sharing your experience . i think i'll be getting that centerpoint for my 2001 diana 34 .177 . i already have the UTG drooper mount and weaver 30mm rings . take care dude .
@danc33673 жыл бұрын
I have a CenterPoint 3-9x40AO illuminated Mil-Dot And a Hawke 3-9x40AO Mil-Dot I paid a little over $100 for each IMO, the Hawke is the better scope.
@dazplas3 жыл бұрын
Think if you'd of set the camera up properly on the Hawke, instead of having it black out half the scope, set both reticles up so they wouldn't blur out, then you'd spot the Hawke would be much better optics. It was clear right from the beginning, that you were bias towards your cheap centerpoint.
@man350z3 жыл бұрын
I agree with you Darren, he does not know how to use the Hawke. I have a Bushnell and a Hawke of similar specs. I now buy Hawkes for my rifles.
@slowpokeairgunner40275 жыл бұрын
Really nice to see this, appreciate the video.
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks I thought it'd be a good comparison
@MrDirtysteve754 жыл бұрын
With anything made in China, it will be as tight or as loose with specs and quality as the company its being made for dictates. If Fender wants a budget Squier guitar, that's what will be built. If Chapman wants a high end guitar, thats what they will built. Both will probably be built in the same factory. Some times you get more or less than you pay for depending on who the importer is. A 1x30 belt grinder sold by Harbor Freight is a better by than the one offered by Grizzly. They are the same machine, but Grizzly charges 2 or 3x more than HF.
@nicedward75444 жыл бұрын
Which one comes with rings?
@DaDaDo6614 жыл бұрын
The center point
@jdmbraceyourself6952 жыл бұрын
Another great video
@jackle8420002 жыл бұрын
Same factory? Who cares if it is even? I can make a turd or eggs and bacon. Clarity is a small portion. How's the rest compare? I had one $100 Chinese scope that had nice clarity and I sent it back cause it claimed to be gas purged and all yet it wasn't. The fast focus eye piece would completely unscrew right off even with no apparent seal. How's the turrets? Do they track? Can you test it for recoil etc? Clarity looks fine but I'm interested in more info if you got it. Thanks for the clarity comparison but it's pretty well meaningless without the rest.
@robtaylor8933 жыл бұрын
The view from my Volkswagen is no worse than the view from my Ferrari I guess that means the Volkswagen is better as it’s cheaper right?
@colinrecardo6452 Жыл бұрын
The Hawke will track much better plus the Hawke will ever lifetime guarantee no comparison.
@shottonfb2 жыл бұрын
Hawke compact 3-12x40 $420 you been conned $180 in wall mart
@rolandomartinez92994 жыл бұрын
One it’s 390 2 jt cuz you spend more doesn’t means it’s always gonna be the same they did that cuz not everyone is gonna use the mounts that come with the scope
@everythingairguns00072 жыл бұрын
great info, james!
@bartavaughan2953 жыл бұрын
It is comparing. Harley to Honda they both get your ass where your going. Ill stick with cheaper thanks.
@Donny_Juanny3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but compare them in low light. I betting the hawke does better.
@littledaddynesbit4193 Жыл бұрын
..if you're use to cheap optics, you can't compare. Try shooting them at a target, at distance, you'll soon understand the what you're paying the extra for...
@MrRockstar19683 жыл бұрын
The majority of scopes world wide are manufactured in China, soma are exceptional quality and some are appalling. It's pointless having a scope ready to go if it's an appalling quality with poor tracking etc. Fortunately for yourself that wasn't the case.
@LONGRANGEPRECISIONSHOOTING3 жыл бұрын
The Hawke scope was way clearer.
@aronkoppold19495 жыл бұрын
It looks like the 400 dollar one is worse than the center point
@hunter-jx4my5 жыл бұрын
Good comparison Jimmy in other words don't waste your money !!!
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tim!
@shottonfb2 жыл бұрын
Thumbs down as you forgot to mention 🤷♂️ The Hawke is Rimfire and Airgun recoil proofed the CP is for pcp only
@heithwatkins4 жыл бұрын
I guess you aren't sponsored by Hawk!😎😎😎😎
@taurushipointenthusiast13064 жыл бұрын
Doing some research myself I hear a lot of trash talk on Center Point, MOST is Illogical my "friend" said or an "Uncle", Next logical question I do ask is You Ever had one? the stench and looks I get 99% have not ever owned one. And are basing an opinion on nothing, Yes the Hawk is a little clearer distance wise pushing out past 300 yards or so, Even then one must realize 99% of all Shots for game in America is no greater than 100-150 yards. ALL REALISM involved, $500 scope and hardware for "HUNTING" Be a NO!!, However YES if I were what is called "PRIZE SHOOTING" long distance for cash/bragging sure the Hawk would be ideal. But then again Hawk owner bad day, or sick that day and lost to a Center Point. I would not want to be that guy
@fx4fxnytro Жыл бұрын
The Hawke is far better. I would not put a centerpoint on my .22lr lol.
@ratorgersen79383 жыл бұрын
i bet that centerpoint would last about 100 shots from my hw 90 before the internals fell apart....to all viewers>>>>>>DO NOT buy a centerpoint....DO NOT......
@Fister_of_Muppets5 жыл бұрын
Cool that CenterPoint sent you a Hawke scope to review 😂
@STKO20115 жыл бұрын
Actually Airgun Depot sent it me for making 381yd shot offhand which according to Travis's email it's the longest shot taken with an Umarex Gauntlet
@keithwilliams88074 жыл бұрын
Do you know the twist rate of the Umarex gauntlet in 25 caliber
@LONGRANGEPRECISIONSHOOTING3 жыл бұрын
I hate to bust your bubble but unless you spend over 1,000 dollars your scope is made in china
@ScentitarFragrance4 жыл бұрын
I thought the hawk looked far better
@dandetande2885 жыл бұрын
This is so true!!! Overpriced but same quality!!!
@brettking28004 жыл бұрын
Plastic centerpoint vs aircraft grade aluminum hawke. Hmmmmm.