Unfortunately, or fortunately, last November (2017) Britain was not represented in the ICJ for the first time that the 5 permanent members are not all represented in ICJ.
@rikybologna35795 жыл бұрын
The fact that the UNSC still having 5 permanent Members nowadays is so detrimental and demonstrates how much Ius Gentium needs to evolve itself even now.
@nazarkazmi92707 жыл бұрын
I translated the court introduction in Urdu language in December 2016. Please send me this video if anybody has.
@Xores2635 жыл бұрын
Great work thank you
@funsky775 жыл бұрын
Who calls the ICJ a "World Court"?
@PUBLICcfcUSA3 жыл бұрын
So what 😎👍
@moldiemort8 жыл бұрын
hand gestures on point!!
@lawwithghulamnabiabbasi78973 жыл бұрын
very Informative
@MrDevil001008 жыл бұрын
Great Job!!
@bantalee20027 жыл бұрын
So why doesn't the United States and other interested nations take China into this ICJ and settle the South China Sea dispute?. or did they and we were not told of the outcome?
@rikybologna35795 жыл бұрын
Each Atates should make a unilateral declaration to official recognise the ICJ rule. Just stated this, the USA made its own one affirming that customary international law should be applied to them only despite conventional one, that can be applied if all Parts of a treaty are the very same ones of a dispute. Overall, this may become an advantage or a disadvantage according to the particular dispute rulled. Thus, universal accepted customary international law (opinio iuris sive necessitatis + diuturnitas of the majority of Intermational Community's States) is not providing enough to solve what you mentioned about China probably.
@msrabiahealthcarecenterand20588 жыл бұрын
I seen an introduction to the international court of justice.