We will address your questions in our upcoming podcast "Let There Be Answers!" Please leave your questions below 🤩 kzbin.info/www/bejne/nanGgHZugtqFa5o
@ALavin-en1krАй бұрын
It is not so much a question as why Christianity, which was revolutionary then, and is at any time, had to be filtered by the Church. The Church likely had to do it as Christianity deals with consciousness; Christ Consciousness. Even today consciousness is referred to as ‘the hard problem’ by philosophers. What the Church had to convey had to be done symbolically in the ceremony of the Mass. The two things to be conveyed by Christ Consciousness were: Transubstantiation and Transfiguration. At any time, even at the cusp of a quantum age and with consciousness being ‘the hard problem’ these are difficult topics to convey, except symbolically. So it is symbolized in the Mass where ‘bread’ likely symbolizing the body and ‘wine’ likely symbolizing the blood are transformed and transfigured into ‘the body and blood of Christ’ which is likely both Transubstantiation and Transfiguration and deals with consciousness. Not consciousness itself, which if fundamental does not need transformation but human consciousness does. Christians see Christ as the one and only embodiment of Christ Consciousness; although in the East there are Avatars who have had, and have, a similar state of consciousness. There is plenty said about physical or elemental evolution and maybe a little about psychic evolution; but much less about the evolution of human consciousness; likely as what that means, or would mean, is not easy to comprehend; especially as consciousness itself is not comprehended; hence its designation as ‘the hard problem.’ The implications of this, as we are still material-age bound; although we are now in an automatic age, having left the material age behind with splitting the atom, and are moving towards a quantum age at some future time. Will Christianity still be relevant then? If it has to do with consciousness it will be, as we cannot think of an age when consciousness will not be relevant. In its absence there may be something but it would have no meaning without consciousness. Little wonder it is ‘the hard problem’ for philosophers.
@JamesBarry-j7mАй бұрын
It's interesting because he is a composite of several different belief structures he has been molded into something.
@JamesBarry-j7mАй бұрын
@@ALavin-en1krit's very interesting how Christ is a composite of so many different belief structures and that Christianity then fine tuned his outline
@ALavin-en1krАй бұрын
@@JamesBarry-j7m True. Christ consciousness; Krishna consciousness. Consciousness is universal. As I mentioned before it is ‘the hard problem’ for atheistic philosophy.
@ALavin-en1krАй бұрын
@@JamesBarry-j7m Post next to what I am responding to. Christ consciousness or awareness of consciousness not just in the body and environment but in the whole universe and is not a composite. Cosmic Consciousness or Christ Consciousness is; it is not a composite of anything as nothing exists outside it.
@ThatAustrianPrinceАй бұрын
I love John's style of delivery and abundance of knowledge. Many thanks to the Centre Place team for another great lecture!
@brotherjongrey937527 күн бұрын
Lol, started reading this thinking you were referring to John the biblical author.
@garymensurati1631Ай бұрын
Thank you John and Centre Place. As always, excellent content and delivery. Appreciate your time and efforts !
@fastballflakes5385Ай бұрын
Another wonderful Hamercopia of Knowledge tonight. Can't wait for the Q and A stream next week. See you then, Hamerheads!
@bard_of_dundeeАй бұрын
I love these videos too! Proud Hamerhead here 🙋♂️
@hamncheeАй бұрын
Hamerhead! Love it. Put it on some merch, I'll buy it!
@centre-placeАй бұрын
@@hamnchee oh that's an idea
@bard_of_dundeeАй бұрын
@@centre-place I'd buy it too!
@pebystrollАй бұрын
Thank you so much for the community you've helped build. I haven't missed a video in months 🎉
@mariom6982Ай бұрын
It's so much better without live audience which always use to interrupt the lecture instead of waiting till the end
@garymensurati1631Ай бұрын
Agree 💯👍
@austinhertell5634Ай бұрын
Yes
@hamncheeАй бұрын
Seriously, Covid was the best thing to happen to this channel, as insensitive as that may be to say.
@mikecook8667Ай бұрын
I couldn’t agree more. 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
@dantallman5345Ай бұрын
For sure better now. I liked hearing the questions, some of them were very good. However, sound level was too variable and taking questions mid lecture disrupted the flow.
@paulastrange3343Ай бұрын
Missed it live but always catch up eventually.
@NealBonesАй бұрын
Fantastic stuff as always my friend 😁 cant wait for the new series with you and Leandro
@bgp001Ай бұрын
Would love to hear a lecture comparing and contrasting the Christian, Muslim and Gnostic versions of Jesus.
@FlapperjawАй бұрын
Top shelf presentation....thank you
@Steve-u9k4pАй бұрын
Superb as always. Thank you
@Incredabad1337Ай бұрын
Would love to see a lecture on Emanuel Swedenborg. As always this was excellent 👌
@bookiankhoo878626 күн бұрын
Thanks
@centre-place21 күн бұрын
Thank you for your support!
@justmoritz20 күн бұрын
@centre-place, I wish you had a playlist or database that can be sorted by date of lecture and topic. It's hard to find on KZbin and the website.
@venusjordan744019 күн бұрын
I would love to hear your thoughts on the Shroud of Turin given recent scientific findings.
@achristfollowingturnbullma823712 күн бұрын
If you read scripture it tells us that Yeshua had a face cloth so the Turin doesn’t fit in with the Bible verse
@VSP4591Ай бұрын
Mulțumim!
@centre-placeАй бұрын
Thanks for supporting our lectures
@austinhertell5634Ай бұрын
Hamer the homie !
@paperback10Ай бұрын
I look forward to Hamertime.
@joshuagrant3821Ай бұрын
In the questions you spoke about Joseph in the 'traditional' views and Mary being raised in the temple. From what source is that, if I wanted to read more? Thank you for the excellent lectures.
@FaceripАй бұрын
This content is like fine dining for me. Thanks!
@RadioFreeHammerhalАй бұрын
From what I have seen it appears that the Gnostic gospels primarily focus on cosmology and the knowledge of that being the source of salvation and don't seem to say much at all in terms of moral teachings. Is that an accurate interpretation, or is that just what gets talked about most because that's where the divergence is?
@ianharper3213Ай бұрын
Yes, you are correct. That's why they are not in the Bible.
@hamncheeАй бұрын
Early Christians had a lot of hot sects.
@NealBonesАй бұрын
😂👏
@DivoGoАй бұрын
Let’s hear it for hot Christian sects!!!! Yeah baybee!🤣
@superneko99Ай бұрын
I don't care if it rains or freezes, long as I got the gnostic Jesus
@kengemmerАй бұрын
In the Gospel of John, Jesus identifies with the light of pure conscious saying “I am the light of the world”. In saying 77 of the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus says he is the light over all and he is the All. This nondual not dualistic as is often claimed about the so called “Gnostics”
@konstantinNeoАй бұрын
John your analisis is great and I like these videos a lot. However the complete lack of a "non dualistic" view, limits understanding severely. A proper non dualistic model will integrate a lot of what the gnostics describe. If there is a need I could provide you with the basic non dualistic model.
@ramkittyАй бұрын
Anger magic the aggression applies the affect
@meditativehypnosen-dr.ho-oq7zqАй бұрын
1. Those who wrote the gospels and who never had met Jesus, belittled his disciples, although he chose them. Why? 2. They made up a story and the disciples knew the truth. 3. Story: Bodily resurrection. Truth: Resurrection is a spiritual event (Luke: heaven is within you).
@masada2828Ай бұрын
‘If the Christ be not risen, my faith is in vain & we are yet, in our sin’. Salvation revolves around a bodily resurrection.
@meditativehypnosen-dr.ho-oq7zqАй бұрын
@@masada2828 That is what they told you.
@juliusmanjengwa6465Ай бұрын
Paul did not experience a bodily resurrection
@meditativehypnosen-dr.ho-oq7zqАй бұрын
@@juliusmanjengwa6465 Although he reduced the message of Jesus to bodily resurrection. However, he had never met Jesus.
@gsr453519 күн бұрын
But as Bart Ehrman points out, if Jesus called himself "God" (in the flesh), why doesn't the earliest Gospel (Mark) mention this? How could Mark possibly not point this out? Suspicious.
@jefrolievertinitz7836Ай бұрын
Jon I'm asking for behavior advice. I was invited to Amish church tomorrow.
@maxhung69Ай бұрын
one of biggest ironies in western history is Paul's distortions of Jesus' teachings. without Paul, Jesus and his movement would have been a very minor sect of Judaism instead of the dominant religion of the western world
@BluesruseАй бұрын
The irony is that we might have it backwards: Paul's teachings distorted into Jesus'.
@jussikankinen9409Ай бұрын
Helping the poor is what modern christians hate
@garymensurati1631Ай бұрын
Sometimes seems that way unfortunately.
@hamncheeАй бұрын
Very true. Many of them want to outsource their charity to government.
@paperback10Ай бұрын
Big government small church!
@dbarker7794Ай бұрын
O God help you. 😮@@hamnchee
@noorzanayasmin7806Ай бұрын
Where did you get this source? From my experience, Christian are the one who seems to want to help the vulnurable the most. According to research, people who are religious or Christian tend to give more away in donation or what not to poor than atheist
@Eric777-71Ай бұрын
The disciples didn't understand because God didn't want them to understand 🙏
@WayneBraackАй бұрын
Well that seems like a bad plan
@Eric777-71Ай бұрын
@@WayneBraackit happened the way it happened.
@kylemaher4811Ай бұрын
I wouldn't want to be associated with Jesus either after he was arrested in a park with a naked boy (Mark 14:51,52). claiming not to be a pirate/human trafficker. And I think Pontius might have gotten it right, and when I revisit these stories with the perspective of Jesus being guilty person, who comes across as a highly educated in philosophy, with knowledge of medicine/drugs, seeing Jesus as a con man healer who manipulated the poor, the lost, the prostitutes and the sick with knowledge, secrecy, drugs and antidotes, the stories and miracles make more sense to me as plausible. So my question would be, is there any evidence that supports Pontius and his case? Super rough question I know but I can't help but wonder
@jussikankinen9409Ай бұрын
Who those asian soldiers in picture
@gabrielgarza2294Ай бұрын
Burn a piece of toast; I am there
@elyknavillus777Ай бұрын
Comment
@garymensurati1631Ай бұрын
When did the commercials start. 1st time in a year they appear for me.
@centre-placeАй бұрын
Unfortunately KZbin automatically adds tons of ad breaks as soon as the lecture ends. We go and remove most of them as soon as we can. We always leave 2 or 3 ad breaks per lecture because this is one of the main sources of income for the channel since we don't have a pay wall.
@BluesruseАй бұрын
*Original.
@jefrolievertinitz7836Ай бұрын
I'll look later. I'm serious
@jefrolievertinitz7836Ай бұрын
Ok I'll b unobtrusively graceful
@Chad2badddАй бұрын
Christ is LORD
@najamulghanikhanАй бұрын
Anger in Christ's response was due to the misplaced healing request. God Almighty is the sole source of power and healing. Inspite of His teaching folks were approaching him for prayers request. This dependency on others than God Almighty what Christ was looking to break
@sparrowthesissy2186Ай бұрын
Are you talking about the story where Jesus doesn't want to heal a little girl because of his prejudices against Gentiles?
@denaisaacthiswasgreat.thum7598Ай бұрын
No a leper.@@sparrowthesissy2186
@konstantinNeoАй бұрын
John, stop beating around the bush. Non dualistic Jesus is what you must explore.
@TheRataman1Ай бұрын
so wrong yeshua never was crucified read more
@kaudjarАй бұрын
Can you use punctuation please? Defining your sentence depends on it.
@Joshua_FroschauerАй бұрын
Creating Christ is a very compelling book/documentary
@benokaston1440Ай бұрын
This river to the sea Palestine will be free professor is confused about life, truth and consequences.
@JohnAllenRoyceАй бұрын
No, disagree. Sounds like you're upside down though.
@EdwardPalmer-u9rАй бұрын
I love Gnostic Jesus because he is evil and sinister