Oh Boy! that engine start sound after fuel introduction is very very satisfying!
@cavsh00ter5 жыл бұрын
All I know is this guy has done very well for himself and has shared with us his passion, thanks
@johnroche25935 жыл бұрын
Zz
@C172Pilotdude5 жыл бұрын
I have been in love with the 210 since high school and when I discovered the Silver Eagle, I was enamored.
@22floridacat6 жыл бұрын
Dude those two Landings I seen our excellent Landings! Oh my God you can't do it no better than that, soft soft touch down way to go. I'm Impressed.
@cheeseman17726 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite aircraft because it's a 210 but with a turboprop and the 210 is already pretty cool
@akbarshoed2 жыл бұрын
This is my favorite airplane video on KZbin. You just accomplish so much in this video. So well done.
@Alex-us2vw5 жыл бұрын
Perfect airframe for a turbine upgrade! Must be a joy to fly.
@Glen.Danielsen6 жыл бұрын
Beastie turboprops! Just their sound is music to the ears. Beautiful video!
@believeachieve28472 жыл бұрын
INCREDIBLE video!! Terrifying landing into valley! Fantastic airmanship!
@josephdupont4 жыл бұрын
There is money and then there is money. But this is an amazing machine what is the range of This Plane? What a beautiful machine I wish everybody could afford one
@rogeliolopez21904 жыл бұрын
I think it had a 1,000 nautical mile range!
@TralfazConstruction4 жыл бұрын
Ah, the fruits of patience, hard work and higher education. What a beautiful aircraft! Well done.
@asimsherzai3 жыл бұрын
Classic Cessna Beautiful countryside with a relaxing view
@RenegadeADV5 жыл бұрын
Man that thing is such a freaking hot rod!
@easttexan29335 жыл бұрын
TO/Landings were incredible. The views out the window is second to none. wonderful video. I hope you have a good maintenance schedule for that nose wheel suspension. Not sure it was designed for repeated rough field TO/Landings.
@bigmac30065 жыл бұрын
Wow, i expected the wings to rip off on take off !! What a wonderful sound on startup.
@nemo2275 жыл бұрын
Thousands of viewers began smiling when we heard the turbine winding up and igniting.
@johnp.3090 Жыл бұрын
Just love that startup sound
@OscarTUANIS5 жыл бұрын
I love the turboprop. beautiful
@MasboyRC4 жыл бұрын
Awesome, the one of my dream plane. Thanks for sharing 👍
@afterburner28696 жыл бұрын
Someone has some very deeeeeeeeeeeep pockets!
@logoseven33654 жыл бұрын
Cool plane. Wild STC. The gear comes up pretty quick.
@bernardanderson75696 жыл бұрын
The P-210 Silver 🦅 is the most powerful singer engine Turboprop that you will ever need and to operate out of a grass strip is incredible
@Flightstar6 жыл бұрын
That engine sure does sing a sweet sound.
@UncleKennysPlace6 жыл бұрын
Naw. I need a Pilatus PC-12, which, I believe, has operated out of the very grass strip in the video.
@dasjung24594 жыл бұрын
Ammazing plane! Love the approach looks complicated...
@Siquemar16 жыл бұрын
This 210 is powerful ! Very Good ! Congratulations 😊😊😊👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
@odderotter89503 жыл бұрын
Makes me downright giddy to listen to that thing take off ! 🤣
@C172Pilotdude4 жыл бұрын
One of my all time favorites.
@glennllewellyn73696 жыл бұрын
Beautiful creation. Thank you for doing this.
@thebluegreengoose6 жыл бұрын
I still love my Cherokee 140, but I would not dream of flying it over those mountains.
@brandonandrew68445 жыл бұрын
What a sweet place you have there!
@realjohnald2 жыл бұрын
0:57 BEAUTIFUL sound
@joediamond21576 жыл бұрын
Spectacular video. Thank you. One question I do have is why so many P210 turbine aircraft including yours, does not have a full anti-ice/de-ice package on it given its altitude capability and performance and area you are flying in?
@cardinalflyer6 жыл бұрын
I had many of these radios in my prior panel, fun to see them still working in 2018. I see you never even launched the Argus, with it's 9 year old database. I even had the Argus and the Shadin fuel flow you have. I am curious about the VFR flight only placard: clearly that's appropriate for your home airport I'd think it would be useful for enroute or destination weather. Although, 30 GPH, 147 kts at altitude and what, 90 gallons without Flint tip tanks? You probably are not flying into many major weather systems in that distance. Fond memories for me and an outstanding package for the world you are enjoying. Very nice all around.
@ericlozen96315 жыл бұрын
Very impressive piloting skills. It was also nerve-racking to watch.
@Kev3765 жыл бұрын
Ok how.many turbines do you have stuffed in that hanger???
@Treasureson78RPM3 жыл бұрын
Man this thing is bad ass. So much power in a small plane. Looks really fun to fly.
@azspotfree4 жыл бұрын
I love the sound of a gas turbine spooling up in the morning. It sounds like..... victory
@tuningsnow3 жыл бұрын
Locher airfield seems to have the most exquisite airplanes
@olekristoffersen92984 жыл бұрын
Nice convertion, The turbine engines are more powerful and lighter than a piston engine, and you probably get a higher payload and a realy nice climbrate. However the airframe probaly has a VNE limitation so any rocket except for climb performance ? Probably not.
@TRPGpilot3 жыл бұрын
@sk.fox2011 You are simply . . . stupid
@whymistamista56146 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful sound.
@iNSANEcOOkieMONstEr6 жыл бұрын
NonyaBusiness! Actually, what AEROMAGNUM TV might be trying to say in limited form expressing, "nope" is that although the Silver Eagle does burn 'JetA' as opposed to its counterparts insistence of 'Avgas', the previously installed Continental consumed(s) 23 gph, while the 250B17F/2 450 shp that weighs half of what the reciprocating engine weighed pencils out to about 22 gph (+/-). (Fuel consumption (gph): @ 12,000 ft: 24.0, @ 17,500 ft: 22.7, @ 23,000 ft: 19.5) The transformation is nothing short of phenomenal and can only be truly realized behind the yoke. Believe me, it IS phenomenal! And the SE can take off AND land in minimal space, usually 600ft. for landing/ 700ft. TO over a 50ft obstacle. That is something the OEM reciprocating hulk-of-a-machine could never do, let alone consider taking off from this mountainside. FYI: Even the best reciprocating P210R could never make it out of this Locher grass strip. In simplistic terms, it could never be said that it is "poor bang for the buck". A comment like this might be in consideration of VLJ options. But given the mountainous strip angles and terrain, I am pretty sure even the best of the best comparable 'very light jet' would end up in the owners warehouse with great loss. So, "Best Bang" for the owners strip,,, well dig a little more for the Pilatus PC-12. So, nothing could be further than the truth ... and like Ferris Bueller said, "It is so choice, if you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
@mariadelia7945 Жыл бұрын
26 gallons an hour X $7.00 a gallon of JetA= $182 bucks an hour at 216 kts X 1.15 = 248 MPH, 2 hour round trip, $364 bucks. How much do you need to have in cash to live comforably and be able to maintain the TP210? I'd say at least be completely out of debt and have 3 million in cash and an income of about 80K a year. What say you all?
@alexanderfederowicz Жыл бұрын
I think I would want to grab a few low mileage planes for parts... Good air frames with engines that were gone because of random parts failure... Strip out the Motors and keep them for parts... Also I would want to do a modern version of the Silver Eagle with a full glass panel for absolute minimization of engine operation issues... Also I would always fly it with a competent friend... I believe one should Fly like one Scuba Dives... Never Alone... There are Old Pilots, there are Bold Pilots... But there just are not many OLD... BOLD... Pilots.... The Alps Reach up to grab you real fast when a single like that has an Engine failure that can actually be righted... One to fly it and one to fix the problem... May I also suggest learning the Techniques that ATP Pilots do for these issues... Some days I feel a bit Old.... Some Days I feel a Bit Bold... But I make Sure I'm on Tera Firma when Both are a Happening thing...
@jimtheedcguy4313 Жыл бұрын
Literally no one has said cost of ownership of an airplane is cheap. You can’t just compare everything in life to a dollar amount without taking in the value aspect of it, otherwise we’d all just eat bread and drink water.
@BannedOnMain11 ай бұрын
The advantage of a silver eagle is that, aside from acquisition cost, its actually cheaper to operate than a piston P210. This is solely because the TSIO-520 they came with only had 1400hr TBO and the Allison is 3600. Yes the fuel burn is higher, but you climb at 2000fpm instead of 600 in the piston, you also dont have to step climb with the Allison. Typical flight plan for these is 25gph, but its more like 20 in reality.
@MattMorris48110 ай бұрын
Anyone with a plane like this makes more than $80k a year most likely a lot more.
@billjonesnation7 ай бұрын
500K + is my guess.@@MattMorris481
@edwardmarriott56722 жыл бұрын
Looking to buy a silver eagle.. Thank you for sharing quite Enjoyable..I owned a C210 long time ago…four sears not much of a pay load..nothing like this one.
@r0dnee2 жыл бұрын
Watch that hot start
@sherrysetliff25026 жыл бұрын
Gotcha. Was unaware of the upgrade on the eagle. Most 210's were the turbo but you have gone big with this. Beautiful plane. We had a 182 rg and it was a neat plane but I sure wish we had your prop. Simply awesome. One super single engine. Much better than most people realize.
@Vfh........y6 жыл бұрын
Wow.........now that's power. 25 gph..
@ryanslut56076 жыл бұрын
Two is what? Twice the fun or twice the trouble of twice the Maitnance. Lol turbine be fun tho
@ThePaulv126 жыл бұрын
Now this is what I call a conversion - what a great thing!
@ericcurry11194 жыл бұрын
Isn't this a 210? When I used to fly with Civil Air Patrol as a search and rescue pilot I remember doing a search for one of these that crashed. It turned out that the pilot flew through cumulus clouds and the wings were ripped off. Must have been really horrible riding that plane all the way down without a wing. I have always thought that really slick look was weaker than a traditional construction with a wing strut.
@Spec624 жыл бұрын
. . .but never strong enough to attempt to fly into a cumulus cloud.
@cavsh00ter4 жыл бұрын
ever looked at an MU 2 no struts two engines, and OMG no alerions,
@ericcurry11194 жыл бұрын
I did not know the MU2 did not have ailerons? Are you sure, seems odd to me. I'm not an aeronautical engineer but it sure looks like the MU2 's high wing is really tied into the fuselage with a lot more structural integrity, it looks to me as a non expert that the 210 is tied into the fuselage at a very thin section of the fuselage. What do I know...
@cavsh00ter4 жыл бұрын
MU 2 has spoilers on top, Really check it out, extream wing loading, same as a 210 theres more than it looks like, there is an AD to have the spair inspection done, I've flown 210s and the are tough birds, MU 2 s are my favorite, noisy Garret's and buddy it's a get up and go Plane
@ericcurry11194 жыл бұрын
I agree the MU 2 is a beautiful airplane. Thanks for making me smarter.
@envitech02 Жыл бұрын
Damn!!!! 2:06 That thing is loud as a rocket!! But absolutely beautiful plane! I checked it's a derivative of the 206, but w RG and w/o wing strut.
@tomkeating65 Жыл бұрын
Its a p210 with an Allison turboprop
@royalgreenlantern11 ай бұрын
I want one of these with full Garmin avionics
@DanielMorales-dz4nv6 жыл бұрын
That plane is amazing. It just lacks the glass cockpit.
@Truebluexpat5 жыл бұрын
My god that is the machine
@rogerstuder36805 жыл бұрын
Hill down landing, unpaved, wet, impressive.
@juteint40686 жыл бұрын
Great vid! Great plane 18000 ft, 190 kts, 24 gal, 1400 useful, 950 miles, but the 5 blades is it a plus???
@brianmcgee1156 жыл бұрын
The sound of the turbine is beautiful!
@socomon696 жыл бұрын
That airfield never fails to scare the shit out of me.
@arizonatumbleweeds6284 жыл бұрын
Love Cessna!!! Thank you for the video!!!
@somuchthingstosay37046 жыл бұрын
Man! what a beauty those Cantilever wings so clean no struts,I am jealous but, have FUNNNN.
@thedave77605 жыл бұрын
Bloody Hell that thing has some power, the noise is like a drag racer, or is that a V8 going down the road that I am hearing?
@mikeblackford9943 жыл бұрын
WOW! Fantastic plane and vid.
@HM-wu3gh6 жыл бұрын
I love that plane along with the Cessna 337
@NM-apache4 жыл бұрын
I was checked out in a C-210. Great plane.
@mmichaeldonavon6 жыл бұрын
I was curious about the Airworthiness Certificate being awarded in Feb 2018. Was that due to the installation of the new engine?Super nice airplane - but now, those "100 dollar Hamburgers" are much more pricey! :)Also, curious about the United States' Registration N-800LG (the "LG" is for you, right?) Is the airplane "TDY" (temporary duty) in Germany, or later on will have a German Registration?I see that you are an inventor - I would have loved to have had the mind to do that. Thanks for a nice video. Oh, and I loved all of those "Steam Gauges!" :) I worked on many aircraft with those identical indicators. Even though they are analog indicators, they were/are very accurate. Thanks.
@VindicatorJones4 жыл бұрын
Turbine with wings without struts.... hmmm.. I would be terrified to overspeed this thing, and I think it would be so easy to do.
@camdraper46444 жыл бұрын
Pilatus is a turbine without struts, tbm, Mitsubishi MU-2 ... whats your point here the 210 is a good airframe, its a different wing design it doesn't need struts
@Vulcancruiser4 жыл бұрын
I'm with Jones here.......love Cessna but no strut no go for me.......my son was a CFI (now 737 driver) years ago and taught a guy to fly in the 210. All was well until one day over the Rockies at 20,000ft the wings came off and the whole family cratered.........I have time in 152-172-182 and they are all great, even hit some severe in the 182 and it came through without a ruffle.........struts good.......
@TheAvenstar4 жыл бұрын
-- It IS easy to do! I watched video yesterday of a Draco -- modified with 600 hp turbine -- totaled out on takeoff as the left wing dipped slightly -- 3 seconds into the takeoff roll -- about a half second from being airborne, and then it was all over ...over a million dollars worth of modifications all over the place! Way too much power!
@TheAvenstar4 жыл бұрын
@@camdraper4644 A 737 doesn't have struts either ...
@z987k4 жыл бұрын
@@Vulcancruiser It's called a cantilevered wing. The vast majority of aircraft do not have struts.
@johnp.3090 Жыл бұрын
I definitely want one of these
@cavsh00ter4 жыл бұрын
love the plane, one of the most rugged planes there are.
@cavsh00ter5 жыл бұрын
Awesome plane, great airport,
@bernardanderson75696 жыл бұрын
I had to come back and watch your starting procedures and what was your rotation speed and climb out power on takeoff?
@aeromagnumtv15816 жыл бұрын
Great job....AWESOME....and a joy to watch!👍
@MrPilotflight5 жыл бұрын
what a fantastic sound...
@hogey746 жыл бұрын
Wow. Serious climb performance.
@jace2wheel7626 жыл бұрын
All this did was get me jazzed for my flight from Calgary to Kelowna in my 182t
@believeachieve28472 жыл бұрын
incredible scenery, but wouldn't you like to have a little more altitude over those mountains in case of an engine failure?
@dunxtonchexton1631 Жыл бұрын
The probability of a turbine failure is essentially 0 (mean time between failures is on the order of hundreds of thousands of flight hours), based on what he showed in the video he was flying as high as he could under visual flight rules. To go higher than 18,000 feet would have required filing an instrument flight plan which comes with ATC hefty fees in Europe.
@mecanictransmision6 жыл бұрын
Increíble! Precioso todo.
@johnprice57844 жыл бұрын
I wonder what Wilbur and Orville Wright would have made of that cockpit.
@MBCGRS4 жыл бұрын
Orville's last flight was in a Lockheed Constellation with Howard Hughes in April of 44. He would quite at home I would imagine.
@daveverster74835 жыл бұрын
Fantastic flying..this is a beauty!
@deanc.59846 жыл бұрын
How many aircraft do you own? All turbine? Very nice flying, keep posting. Thank you, Dean ..Cincinnati Ohio.
@alexpinto41183 жыл бұрын
Lindo avião, um sonho... Parabéns e Boa Sorte em seus vôos. 👏👏🤝🇧🇷
@allenkemp31243 жыл бұрын
Holy scheiße that's beautiful!
@uptightnonchalant18576 жыл бұрын
So you got to have an American registration number to operate this in Europe?
@inspiredartphotos4 жыл бұрын
How is this in hot weather? I used to fly a TurboStar converted 402. In high altitude hot conditions the regular 402 outperformed the TurboStar with the Allison’s. We were temperature limited. Nice looking Cessna! What variant Allison are you using?
@jeanjenner45105 жыл бұрын
Is that a Centurion with a turbine?
@Jay-hr3rh6 жыл бұрын
U have a nice and powerful airplane in ur backyard. I have a moped in mine. We should hang out sometime. 🤛
@sturvinmurvin94086 жыл бұрын
They also have a pc12, kodiak quest and a fast LSA called pocket rocket...now they have this...Locher is my spirit animal...
@stevelogan54756 жыл бұрын
I am a fan of cessnas, but you put a lot of confidence in your plane flying over that kind of terrain. In this instance, considering the terrain, i think i would feel quite a bit more comfortable with a super cub, with some good ol' big tires, but its your call and your plane, it is a nice cessna though
@idrisea32476 жыл бұрын
A twin would be best, but turbines are much more reliable than piston engines
@skippynj19796 жыл бұрын
That's the purpose of putting a turbine on this
@jjjjjjjjrifufjssjosskenf6 жыл бұрын
One turbine is more reliable than 2 pistons
@rpnobile5 жыл бұрын
beautiful plane awesome Allison.... who the F.. cares about the gauges..( and super soft touch on the grass) CONGRATULATIONS...
@yesode42016 жыл бұрын
This guy has very cool toys.
@toivevideo6 жыл бұрын
Danke für die immer wieder coolen Videos! Macht echt Spass!
@JcXtreme726 жыл бұрын
That landing was smooooth.
@robertlafnear48655 жыл бұрын
UP,...UP and away.... seems like a bit too much UP ,... na JUST RIGHT ......Thanks for sharing this .
@lebojay4 жыл бұрын
How do the running costs and performance compare to something more mundane (but quick), like a Cirrus or Mooney?
@DavidSmith-mk7qo5 жыл бұрын
I guess when compared in terms of hourly rates a 172 it AINT LOL. Kick the tires and light the fires lets get airborne.
@waynejones34286 жыл бұрын
I used to fly 172's n 210's,,,that's PHUKN KOOL !
@EyeForKnowledge.6 жыл бұрын
31 GPH AT less than 140KT’s??????? HOLY FUCK that’s a lot of fuel for such slow speed.
@Bartonovich526 жыл бұрын
140 knots indicated air speed with ISA + 11C on the ground. Air looks stable... so lapse rate is probably no more than standard. At 15,000 feet, 140 KCAS (I’m assuming minimal position error at cruise attitude) is 180 KTAS... a respectable speed considering the plane wasn’t really trimmed out for a long trip. Get it up into the low flight levels where fuel burn is even less and TAS much greater, and you’d see over 200 KTAS easily.
@superskullmaster6 жыл бұрын
Steve Protoss compare than to the Bell 206 which can’t even do 140kts with this same engine. Plus what the guy above me said.
@theRatchet8336 жыл бұрын
Look at the Garmin 430 at 3:11; the TAS (True Airspeed) at 15,100 ft; is 216kts. Look to the left at the same time; 29.9 GPH is the fuel consumption.
@UncleKennysPlace6 жыл бұрын
Because of the physics of a helicopter rotor, not because of power issues. The trailing blade can stall and the helicopter will roll over.
@sbuzzkill6 жыл бұрын
@@UncleKennysPlace It's definitely a power issue. Pulling max power will not get you even close to 140kts, maybe 120 KTAS on a really good day.
@davidduganne59396 жыл бұрын
What a gorgeous airplane.
@Mike-012343 жыл бұрын
What would be cool to see a Cessna 337 turbo prop
@mikestirewalt51934 жыл бұрын
Very nicely done.
@pilot30164 жыл бұрын
And people think money is evil... Some know what its for!
@bernardanderson75696 жыл бұрын
I love the Pilatus PC-12 that you have but unfortunately you came out with this Beautiful Beast with the 5 Blade prop that now I want a Demo flight along side you
@bernardanderson75696 жыл бұрын
I love it and I'll be there always for the next flight out
@mopar923 жыл бұрын
Jesus. Thing was at VNE still on the ground.
@bryonslatten31473 жыл бұрын
😂
@tedshredz585 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen a few interesting airplanes flying from that little grass field....
@wms16504 жыл бұрын
I agree. I think this is where the Super Hot turban homebuilt is located. I don't remember the name of the aircraft.
@leefithian37044 жыл бұрын
Edward Joyce yes , this person has all the toys , that Cessna is probably the smallest thing flown from there
@mseifried54 жыл бұрын
I love the jet props and want one, but you speak and show us nothing about the performance of the Eagle conversion. What airspeed do you climb at with what rate of climb? What speed do you like to cruise at, what altitude and fuel flow pounds an hour? What is your endurance with four pax and bags? Thanks.
@onenerdarmy5 жыл бұрын
LOL idle fuel consumption rate during checks on the ground is 11.6 gallons per hour...an older Cessna 182 consumes 11.9 gph at 135 kts TAS! But you get what you guzzle for, piston will never be as reliable as a turbine despite the lower fuel rates.
@TRPGpilot5 жыл бұрын
Not familiar with this particular type, I was wondering if it was actually calibrated in litres per hour?
@chucklesx4 жыл бұрын
20- 25 gallons per hour is normal fuel burn @ cruise speeds for this aircraft.