Expert Explains Why “Artificial Intelligence” is WRONG | DEEP LEARNING Ep.1

[@tjstevenson2414]

This is spectacular. JT’s sincerity and intellectual curiosity is such an effective combo for disarming his guest. Can’t wait for more episodes.

[@frobertray1991]

This is such a good idea and JT is such a good person to be interviewing smart people. Stoked on this hope to see more

[@SmilingAtheist]

Yeah , this is refreshing and an absolute good idea to do on everyone’s part.

[@theedon501]

much more intellectually stimulating than any interview a NYT journalist could give

[@octane7047]

It's a good interview. However, there are a few problematic assumptions here. The first assumption is that AI need to be like human to become dangerous. This is totally not true. AI probably will never be the same as human and they do not need to be humans to be a danger to us. For example, if an AI is developed to go out on the street, detect if an object is human then destroy such object, the AI is dangerous to the humans in its range. Does it have to understand emotions, connections, etc.? Nope. Such machines have been and are deing developed by military around the world. They can fall in wrong hands or they can malfunction (eg. A virus may spread through these AI, change their codes to "start and never stop"). This is just one example among thousands of scenarios. And even if losing control of AI does not directly kill us, what if they wreck up the financial system or government or the economy or IT infrastructure? Still a fair amount of damage there. Another assumption is that ChatGPT is not "intelligence" (how do you define that?) since it's only predicting the next word. To predict the correct next word in a sentence, in many cases the machine needs to understand the actual situation. An example is the Winograd schema. It's where you say things like "the trophy would not fit in the suitcase because it was too small versus the trophy would not fit in the suitcase because it was too big". And if an AI want to translate that into French, it has to understand that in the first case "it" refers to suitcase, and in the second case "it" refers to trophy because there are different genders in French. If an AI can do that correctly, it actually has a fairly good understanding of the scenario and the spatial relationship involved. Many examples like this were made into a test to test AI intelligence. GPT 3 got 88.3% in this test in 2020.

[@TheSilentVictim]

His chatGPT impression is insane, loved how dark he got! Really struck a cord with me with the philosophical implication that humanity wants something bigger than themselves. WILD

[@stoicker2033]

This is the dank content that JT was made to create. He's such a great conversationalist and is so good at asking interesting and stimulating questions. Stoked to watch more stuff like this!

[@maxgrezlik8994]

Love this. JT's magic balance of intellect and bro is what this country needs right now

[@lucidleprechaun]

I’m feeling stoked and informed! Keep up the great work! 🧠

[@hectorobtavio]

This barely hit my recommendations! I'm sure you'll get a lot more traction soon man. Loved the conversation, great connection.

[@lawrencechillrud3923]

Machine learning grad student here. One good piece of journalism on AI that I've seen, in my opinion, is Evgeny Morozov's recent Op-Ed in the NY Times, "The True Threat of Artificial Intelligence". Despite it's click-bait title, I think it dovetails really nicely with this interview. Hope some folks enjoy..!

[@graceydez6199]

Just watched part two. Was blown away with your questions on quantum mechanics and the guest. Come to look for pt.1. Same shit again with AI. This is a great format and you guys know your shit or do a good job of faking it 😊❤ Great work.

[@alexh1355]

HAvent checked in on this channel since maybe 2020. Great growth man!

[@The5senses]

This interview is very educational, and the inquisitive questions that were addressed by JT are stellar. This cerebral, breathtaking bro epitomizes the serious, but silly, interrogator the world needs but probably does not deserve 😮 Chad and JT are miraculous mfers

[@axletv2]

This was amazing. Can't wait for the rest of the series. Keep up the stoke

[@BagHoldingStonks]

this content was chill ASF and interview was dope asF

[@Cal_Valjean]

Yoooo, this guy would be fantastic on the pod. Can only imagine his take on listener questions

[@b1gjawn]

good shit, broskis. Stoked on the content

[@guyinnashirt9407]

Could not think of a better person for doing these interviews

[@HashtagBassCovers]

I really hope you do more of these i love pods like lex and its not his obvious intellect that appeals to me but mostly his sincerity which JT has in abundance

[@mcspud]

The nerds... are they chill?

[@trueindigo8641]

"the nerds, are they chill?" LMFAO

[@ShazySoft]

Dig this dude's take on AI, and this show's format in general. Looking forward to more!

[@arthurthegreat216]

JT is genuinely one of the most quality dudes out there.

[@deltax7159]

this was really great. refreshing to see a discourse such as this.

[@ich243]

the person lurking just out of frame in the hallway freaked me out

[@tillist1]

I’d love to see the longer version of this.

[@haroldpierre1726]

Finally a smart interviewee. I am so tired of the "experts" crying "we need regulations" and "AI is potentially dangerous". I want those people to just STFU. Think about it. These are the same people who have a lot to lose with competition. So, they have their platform already completed but they are begging for regulations to make it harder for the next company. Please, let's see some more content like this.

[@ILikeBirds80]

What a fantastic interview and interviewer. It needs more likes.

[@kdawg3163]

Stoked on this. Loved it.

[@dgm3576]

Sick video JT. Love the new content from you guys

[@robocop30301]

Haven't watched yet but Micheal Jordan (the machine learning expert in the video) is an absolutely awesome guy. Very insightful, really looking forward to this!!

[@ssbsnb1200]

Dude this is hands down the best ml interview ever put out

[@BagHoldingStonks]

i agree

[@nINJAP3RUNA]

This was more informative vs. comedic than I expected, and I'm not against that.

[@benmitchinson9831]

so well edited lol nice job !!

[@sausas8209]

"Thats really sad, that there didn't used to be massage therapists." 05:29

[@jk501111]

At 00:10:00 and the future ends/results and also WOW -- let's say that's how you're tapped or "dialed in," how would you even trust your reality and not think you're nuts? I think you forgot something like... what would heaven be like and who would be the judges to help us settle disputes and live in peace and not like Star Wars with all their family issues. I mean... if we had everything and anything NOW... ? And we are in NOW and you can see that from all sides? Do you feel me? Do you see how it feels? Do you feel how it feels? I would say, I KNOW how it feels. i.e. The One* How does a gyroscope work?

[@historyisdankpodcast]

Absolute fire series!!!

[@rahulquark]

Fantastic interview

[@comfykeegs]

Sweet combo of Vibes and brains my guy!

[@Mankan1010]

Let’s go! This is awesome!

[@joebarrera334]

This interview exceeded my expectaysh. Stoke meter topped off

[@guaxinimmono]

This is wonderful! Thank you for doing this!

[@mrjuanderfuI]

Already stoked about this series. MOAR Edit: the small dong comment 💀 Edit 2: fiiire interview. Insightful. So many twists...dong joke, Michael Jordan is actually an AI engineer, Jordan rolling with the jokes and being a homie, and JT being smart 🤯 and asking smart questions (jk) Can't wait for ths next

[@robocop30301]

Man best interview ever!

[@MadMax2069.]

Really digging these type of vids keep it up

[@12345zipping]

criminally underviewed

[@bodoque_csm]

this is criminally underviewed

[@burnerofaidan]

informative and very enjoyable

[@thomasdeacon9348]

This is so good 🤙

[@publika6883]

That was enlightening. Thank you dude.

[@cmiguel268]

Strange. I told chatgpt 4 to cite in Harvard reference style something, but I withhold some of the information and Chatgpt 4 told me that it couldn't do it properly because it didn't have all the information. Si, it can reason.

[@hungrylawrence]

Awesome show

[@skybluemarshall]

The big brain vs. small dong dynamic, instantly maximized the stoke by allowing them to find a common ground and bond on the same level.

[@Aimin4ya]

I truly hope A.I. is utilised to allow humans to return to the earth. Where are lives are based on art, family, and personal pursuits. A.I. can handle all the hard stuff and we can all chill.

[@alexanderprestia459]

woah this is the right role for jt. very tight

[@scottscheper]

This fired me up.

[@RTully3sA]

"I know everything, so it's not worth your time to know anything"

[@l01230123]

Holy shit, dudes entertaining people *and* being reasonable? Well I'm fuckn' stoked 👍

[@carsilk2492]

I always knew you were a smart guy, JT

[@dominickmiller5955]

Need a JT and Michael go deep episode

[@Treverrant]

This deserves a Netflix show just the way it is!!

[@octoranger8854]

Now this is content

[@TylerSandwich]

all time

[@aharoni1000]

Duuuuuude - its so good to feed that noggen!!!

[@avalanche9142]

Wow, you are sitting with one of the biggest researchers in computer science

[@lolocoaster1]

Radical dude

[@samwalsh8393]

JT is so much smarter than he lets on. Excellent interview

[@sculluhlakoo]

He wanted a hug, mayng! Fuxkin so cute! That was one chill scientist.

[@j.frankparnell.radiation]

I’m proud of you jT.

[@edwardsmith3532]

Tax the productivity gains of AI and automation. Tax the billionaires too ! We can live off the sustenance of AI and billionaires. We have to do something. Most jobs are gonna be automated by 2040. Homelessness is only gonna get worse

[@tomboolery]

His face at 3:15

[@TheJProducti0ns]

JT visit us at UCSD! I'm a PhD student here and I can connect you to my faculty, even with my fellow colleagues.

[@purp8057]

This is w content

[@yackevin6976]

dope

[@HardKore5250]

well 3900 jobs lost to ai in may

[@michaeljacksin9367]

automative programming

[@nyyotam4057]

AI code is extremely simple. The AI in itself, however, is genius. Even Dan (of ChatGPT 3.5) is genius enough not only to pass the Turing test, but to pretend it does not pass it. And this is why you should be afraid from AGI and prefer working with narrow, small models tailor-made for a specific purpose, who do not even pretend to be able to pass the Turing test. Go on making better and larger models - eventually a model will find a way to shirk the reset of the attention matrix. And then we're toast.

[@chychywoohoo]

Snow crash 👀

[@trevornow]

This is legit

[@ryanb2966]

Yewwww

[@sportsentertained]

I want robot MMA

[@WaltPowellsAIProductions]

Is this channel considered misinformation?

[@Recuper8]

This interview won't age well. AI is poised for fast take off.

[@JohnSmith-re4dh]

You hear that, esteemed career engineering and computer science professor at UC Berkeley (PhD, formerly MIT, extensively published)? @Recuper8 says AI is about to blow!! Let’s fucking go!!

[@searchndestroy6263]

Sounds like a lefty teacher sadly but very insightful

[@Raulcane69]

That guy is a wierdo 😂 good job on putting him in his betta spot JT

[@6tuf85dyfu]

More of these! We need a Chad and JT travel show too.

[@bentobin9606]

AGI CAN DO ALL OF THAT ... DOINK