CHALLENGE: Beat a Grandmaster with 15% accuracy

[@chessbrah]

If you would like to learn more about the burbur saga, this is your video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fGLWm2mVr51lracsi=1Y4j5zloHk97g-aW The lifetime score currently stands at 33.5 - 1.5

[@Rieper47]

15% and 12% accuracy. Still a 2300 performance from both. Well played

[@OwenBlake-xl1vm]

Bro exposed how bad Game Review is.

[@MahG23]

The legendary battle between burbur and Aman continues

[@labestianegra6373]

Against burbur555 who intentionally plays badly against the dirty flagger Aman Hambelton? Really, that´s how you want to sell to us mastering this challenge? Pathetic. Don`t support these guys.

[@srenkristiansen2516]

How on earth did the analysis, rate you both 2300 for that game?

[@astrogersunited5389]

because the game review knows they are trolling

[@RG001100]

If you give the engine a game between Magnus and Fabi, but tell the engine it’s between two 400s, the engine will say “very good game, played like 1100s”. It’s relative to rating, not an absolute estimate.

[@potatoman80085]

Chesscum doesn't want people getting their ego hurt, by telling them they played like shit, to play on a different site.

[@elmad2153]

​@@RG001100 Thats too bad. It would be great if the engine rated the game without the elo.

[@user-wi6vkq21k9a]

@@elmad2153very true. But this just exists to make players feels good and doesn’t actually calculates the performance…

[@christianjanowicz7153]

on my last wasted game review i was proud of a blitz game and it told me i played like a 150. this guy is trying to play as badly as possible and still getting 2300

[@DeBert]

Games with burbur always deliver!

[@BramSekreve]

Hmm, 51 misses? Yeah, both these guys played like 2300's. Does the ranking not go lower then a certain set point from your ranking?

[@andrewwilson9123]

Yes, estimated rating is based on your rating. A good game will show higher than your rating and a bad game lower than your rating, but only by 400 points or so

[@JimmyKrochmalska-f7p]

@@andrewwilson9123 uhhhh me getting estimated 100 elo when im rated 800+

[@RyanLeBlanc-w3v]

@@andrewwilson9123I’ve had 2000+ rated games while rated between 1350-1400 (if someone plays directly into a book line I’ve studied). The variance is more than 400

[@GargantuanGouda]

"It's difficult to find bad moves..." bro... tag me in, I'll try to find a good move and we'll meet in the middle.

[@bewlulo]

53.9 accuracy and “estimated elo” of 2300 on that first game! As a 2300, I can attest to the fact that my games are indeed that bad 😊😅

[@MahG23]

Estimated elo of 2300 second game too somehow

[@peterjanbo657]

Same here. And i dont think i play that bad. But i guess i do. Need to study. But the play is the most fun.

[@TiberiusClarkwastaken]

I played 97% accuracy in one game and it said 2300😢

[@HN-md3ql]

Literally 0 blunders by both players last game

[@Travv0]

a miss is a blunder

[@YXalr]

Tbf your second opponent missed some moves.

where? seemed fine to me but I'm 230 on lichess

[@RG001100]

He probably noticed he hung M1 right after playing it, and hoped his opponent wouldn’t notice. Hate it when that happens.

[@wsemenske]

Burbur hates Aman, and tries to lose on purpose because Aman flagged him (or something else "unsportsmanlike"). He always plays fools fate to just accept a quick loss. And Aman always trolls him So in a way burbur is perfect for this challenge

@@wsemenske Nah man it was a pretty high level match

[@znemdez273]

You know maybe if we started trusting these guys more they would upload more.

[@LampshadeFunk]

I kinda admire how long burbur has doubled down on his pettiness, petty goals the finest hater could never aspire to.

[@dangerzone3106]

Aman: It's actually hard to learn to play bad moves Me: 👀

[@Subcomandante_lexi]

That second game looked like my games against worstfish

[@grindingchesspuzzles]

Felt like he got some help in the second game.

[@someoneunknown6894]

Nahh this is how top level chess looks like

[@phonex6918]

Ahh yes a usual 2300 game-

[@brettjones327]

I think the next viewer challenge should be KNVB losing to burbur555 via checkmate. Losing on time doesn't count. It could end being the channel's first impossible challenge, one that ultimately breaks KNVB.

[@DrStabkill]

omg lol

[@usualhumanxd353]

the legend Burbur himself :D i love it so much ahah

[@NarrativeCombat]

Gonna shed tears if joy when you pick up the GM tips series again 🙏🏻

[@shamank]

"It's actually difficult to find bad moves" well, let's start this journey of knowledge

[@redminote7334]

Second game is like two countries or lovers getting closer and closer to each other over time, trusting they wouldn't harm you, with the possibility of ever so profound damage to be done. Be careful who you let this close. Even if they never harm you but one of you depart this life earlier than the other, would the damage be on same levels, but in grief?

[@davidebellomo358]

Remember when "good" moves looked gray in the review and there was no thumbs up?

[@onursna2327]

Laughed thx for this one

[@izk3460]

OMG glasses are back, can't wait for more videos with glasses on.

[@BunniBuu]

Good opening knowledge let you exploit your opponent's positional misstep.

[@fantasticbeast2730]

You guys are the real 'OG' chess content creators.

[@joehanoun3008]

I need to see BurBur's face cam more than anything right now.

[@Knut_OSRS]

Awesome challenge idea, but the second game clearly didn't count. Your opponent was throwing from the very start. I think it's assumed that your opponent should be unaware of the challenge and trying to win for it to be valid.

[@frequensea9434]

Your bad score can only go 400 below but can go like 800 above your rating based on accuracy

[@sebastiandierks7919]

I'd like to see two, say, 1000 rated players replay your first game and see what rating the game review gives them. It certainly won't be 2300.

[@wunknownbeatbox7980]

😂😂 "Qxh7 is the best move, come on!!" 💀

[@404-usernotfound6]

one day youre going to get cocky with burbur and hes going to strike back after years of conditioning you

[@timcannon5384]

This is a great video

[@peterjanbo657]

~Its actually difficult to find bad moves> well no its not! 😂

[@THEchrisse95]

Kramnik: "Let's start the procedure"

[@mikemcdonald2517]

55 the first game was impressive. Does anyone have any below 50 or below 40 games where they managed to win? I'd guess my lowest ever where I won was around mid 50s- I'd love to see some non-collusive games with really low scores

[@joshwong6575]

Can you guys do an accelerated dragon speedrun?

[@austenhaynes1006]

Someone send these games to Kramnik for analysis.

[@YueRandom]

I left to get a glass of water and I come back to see this 11:07, how in the...

[@kingrojin8009]

LMAOOOO I was just thinking about how weird the board looked that cluttered, I didn't even know it could look like that😭😭. Can't imagine what you'd think not knowing how it happened

[@sfr3806]

Great gameplay by Burbur in second game

[@theogantos2664]

All eight pawns pushed all the way LOL

[@GregTurismo]

That first game accuracy was disturbing. That second game was a farce and scandal 😂

[@kasparsmikelsons1549]

This was hillarious 😅😅

[@blakerussell4880]

Hold on, did he clip farm our boy burbur or did he find him in the pool?

[@IvanOleksandrovych]

stockfish vs stockfish plays the bad ever possible game... we saw this

[@P.sherman45]

I have a philosophtcal question is it ever possible to have more accuracy that you opponent and still lose the game? (except losing on time of course)

[@sebastien5048]

It's probably not that uncommon. Your opponent plays pretty well for the whole game (no blunders, no missed wins, nothing like that) and you blunder quite a lot. On the very last move of the game, your opponent blunders a backrank checkmate in one and so you win. You'd have a super low accuracy, his wouldn't be too bad (he just blundered once) and yet...

[@P.sherman45]

@@sebastien5048 yes, but if I blunder and my opponent don't punish me with good moves, it lowers their accuracy, too. I'm just curious because since I thought about it, it has never happened to me. when i win i have more accuracy and when i lose i have less accuracy.

[@sebastien5048]

@ what i'm saying is that you can easily imagine a game where you blunder a lot and your opponent does punish you every time you blunder. So their accuracy is very high. At some point they just make ONE blunder, but it causes them to lose immediately by mate in one.

[@michaelmcdaniel2742]

this was stressful af

[@1Onlyforward]

Clearly a paid actor in the second game. Didn't even watch it once he started shuffling the rook and allowing mate in 1. I guess every move that wasn't mate by a queen added to worse and worse accuracy. Now make that happen without paid actors

[@kellenblackman483]

That first game 😂

[@TheRealistAVD]

Dad! You have returned

[@JimmyKrochmalska-f7p]

new strategy, try to lose but apparently do really good

[@jacoblewis6616]

Our favourite customer returns!

[@ZacBelcher]

I feel like I just unlearned chess.

[@sam2725]

How in hell was the first game +50% lol

[@RG001100]

The first game is incredible. Chesscom really inflates accuracy, I guess.

[@theogantos2664]

53% even a blind squirrel....

[@aaronrossell6338]

This actually makes me angry.

[@mehome4163]

Burbur the man the myth the legendary sulky baby…😂😜

[@mikeskora7760]

I mean the second game wasn't real

[@jacksonhadden]

I like how Aman says 1200s win at sub50% and his titled opponent played at 12%

[@louayyahyaoui3616]

He was clearly trolling

[@CLRobbo91]

Hello Chess Lovers, I have started a KZbin channel where I analyse my competitive chess games, and break things down simply and easy to understand for beginners-early intermediate players. I would be grateful for any support, thank you!

[@Panicdream1]

The second game is so fake...

[@jayjay1drum1skate]

I don’t understand

[@daemonsoadfan]

13:07 how is that a brillant move ?

[@notlewisz3713]

it’s not - I imagine given how wild the position was (and how unlikely it is to be reached naturally) that the move triggered the conditions for a brilliant in a nonsensical edge case way (i.e. white sacrificed material, white can win the queen by force on the next move, evaluation for white is > +3 , etc)

[@mikeock2087]

What happened to chad aman who is this nerdy voice alter ego? Nah that aint it chief

[@frankcsacramone]

I think the game review recognized that Aman understood the position in spite of playing bad moves haha. It's like getting a 0 on the SAT's, you need to know all the right answers in order to get them all wrong!

[@binks2413]

Played like a 2300 in game 1. Gtfo 😂

[@binks2413]

Game 2 still a 2300 😂😂😂

[@SocietyIsCollapsing]

Slightly contrived lol

[@jonahlevi3178]

Yooo wtf how did it say you played like a 2300 😂😂😂😂 that is got to be so fake dude

[@llSlackingOffll]

So basically just play garbage chess lol

[@pj_18]

This is cheating 👎🏻

[@sfgethk7258]

pin this comment for no reason

[@chessbrah]

that would be a reason 🤔

[@allwynsjourney2225]

19 min ago and early also 5th comment, 29th like