@@nazul9502 Still a fearsome vehicle and a historic one at that, most vehicles of war are scrapped, become hard targets or are smelted down so to some people it's quite upsetting to see something they served in being used like that
@nazul95025 жыл бұрын
@@devilishwolfie6975 i get that yeah
@sublicense18a135 жыл бұрын
@@nazul9502 My old Regiment didn't have any problems with them. Just do the maintenance.
@Beta250trials6 жыл бұрын
another reason other lighter tanks are a bit faster is there are running away from the chally
@TankyKB6 жыл бұрын
As an Ex Member of 1RTR of 16 yearsand been through all From Scorpion to Chieftain, Challenger, Eagle1 & 2 I can say it was the best job in the world. Don't knock it until you have tried it
@pedrofridge65374 жыл бұрын
keith birch than you for your service ! i’m looking to join the british army as a infantry soldier or a tank crewman , which would you recommend if neither . what role would you recommend
@JF-xq6fr2 жыл бұрын
@@pedrofridge6537 Former US Army Infantry officer here. Although Bradley IFV was my experience, the only way to fly is GUNNER!!!
@aldo17737 жыл бұрын
that turret traverse though
@9192939fuck6 жыл бұрын
the turret is exited for the shooting range so the body turned to it lol
@Stratigoz5 жыл бұрын
Turret didn't rotate at all after the turn. More like stay'd facing downrange inspite of tanks turn. That's gun stabilizer mechanism.
@wraith01mg5 жыл бұрын
Can rotate 360 degrees in under 9 seconds.
@liamblackburn49684 жыл бұрын
@@wraith01mg 👍 and the driver can turn the tank without it effecting the turret
@stevenbreach25614 жыл бұрын
It's fully stabilised in vertical and horizontal,even the Cheiftain I served on had the same,enables the tank to keep on a target even when moving,that's real life not WOT
@dulls84756 жыл бұрын
Lulworth cove range fired many times there. A very nice range.
@iammalin29826 жыл бұрын
Isnt that close to bovington tank museum
@marcuswardle31805 жыл бұрын
I Am Malin Bovington Tank Museum is in the main camp of the RAC. Lulworth Cove range is part of it. When I lived in Wareham, the town next to Bovi’ you could tell when they were live firing advthe windows would start shaking!
@skinniestfatman56415 жыл бұрын
@@marcuswardle3180 I lived in bovington and my whole house shook when they fired lol
@Shaun1375 жыл бұрын
That's where I did my gunnery course for Scorpion and Scimitar whilst stationed at Bovington Camp.
@marcuswardle31805 жыл бұрын
Lee Woodford You went the ‘Purbeck’ then?
@Daniel-jl6fb3 жыл бұрын
I love the fact that in the dark it had its hazard lights going.
@jaymac72032 жыл бұрын
Safety first! 😭
@ccmogs57573 жыл бұрын
Worked on that range in the "90"s maintaining the small gauge track for the moving targets
@Spizzoid5 жыл бұрын
That's the Lulworth range. The B3070 public road runs behind the firing spot shown. I have parked there while tanks were using the range. Very impressive. Haven't been there for while so not sure it's still possible to watch live firing. Worth checking if you're in that part of the UK.
@bbqchickengamer97287 жыл бұрын
In my opinion the challenger II is getting a little old but its still is great and looks great too
@jamesglass8957 жыл бұрын
Armour is still great...But electronics and the power pack and running gear are getting old. Nead to up grade everything...Sadly Britain won't spend the cash. Main armament neads up graded as well...to use the new ammo. Sadly we rely on Nuclear Weapons which are a last resort not a first resort. And Russia isn't threatening anyone in Eastern europe...if they were we all would know about it. Just Lies.
@oliverlewis95787 жыл бұрын
It's getting a life extension program. Keeping them till 2035 now!
@jonny29547 жыл бұрын
CLEP is the upgrade, but there are no plans of updating neither the powerpack (although the oman CR2 version has the MTU euro-powerpack with 1500hp) nor the main gun, L30, wich is awful. If rheinmetall wins the LEP contract they may redesign the whole turret because the ammunition used in the rh120mm smoothbore L55 cannot be stored in the CR2 turret (as already seen in the CLIP in 2006). The british army even thought about replacing the CR2 due to its lackluster performance. Read: below-the-turret-ring.blogspot.de/2016/06/team-challenger-2s-upgrade-suggestion.html
@stewartbeardshaw32077 жыл бұрын
The challenger 2 is getting upgraded
@PepRex7 жыл бұрын
They just snatched land of Ukraine..
@flybobbie14495 жыл бұрын
I like the way the hazard flashers are running on the tank when it's firing.
@lepwix21658 жыл бұрын
RIMMER!
@tesstickle72678 жыл бұрын
Lepwix mr brittas (if I've spelt it correctly lol)
@beastclarke7 жыл бұрын
It's strange watching Red Dwarf then this
@damasterchief95945 жыл бұрын
I knew I recognised him!!
@drwho69085 жыл бұрын
@@beastclarke: H
@dont_give_a_flying_f5 жыл бұрын
Hes Arnold Arnold arnold rimmer! More reliable than a garden strimmer! Without him life would be much grimmer! He will never need a Zimmer!
@ThatsOk837 жыл бұрын
Why is he comparing WWII tanks with this modern tank?!
@DandizzleUK7 жыл бұрын
The full programme is about the evolution of armour. Can't remember the name however, but I remember it being entertaining!
@fourneaujean75937 жыл бұрын
peut être que la caisse provient du E100 de la WWII?
@tesstickle72676 жыл бұрын
Because it's an example of how far tanks have come.
@xen18745 жыл бұрын
How he just says Panzer
@kevinthepgm38415 жыл бұрын
parce que c'est le moins bon char en europe, avec le moins bon canon
@youngstayoung66334 жыл бұрын
Best tank in the world best armour in the world , it has never been taken out in battle . Never been disabled and theyve took some shots over the years. Mega bit of tech
@kevinbaboolal42252 жыл бұрын
Who gave you that info? CR2s have been disabled in Afghanistan
@frosty-hi5jf2 жыл бұрын
@@kevinbaboolal4225 to my knowledge, the only chally 2 that's been taken out was by another chally 2 in a friendly fire incident. Very unfortunate thing to happen 😕
@ppo24242 жыл бұрын
@@frosty-hi5jf Yep
@Rempai420 Жыл бұрын
@@kevinbaboolal4225 CR2 didn't go to afghan lmao.
@Zx17OPv57i Жыл бұрын
and the slowest, it means dead on battlefield
@himbisaquatics4 жыл бұрын
Only a Challenger 2 could take down another Challenger 2.
@mickmccrohon2 жыл бұрын
Or Russia.
@plant5741 Жыл бұрын
@@mickmccrohon you’re joking right?
@mickmccrohon Жыл бұрын
@@plant5741 Yes, I think HIMBIS AQUATICS is joking. 65 tons of scrap metal once Russia engages them. 65 tons in mud... No air cover, very little support. Dead man walking. I wonder if they will be ordered to stay away from the front-line battles so they aren't seen burning. That's very bad for future sales.
@plant5741 Жыл бұрын
@@mickmccrohon you’ve got to work on your grammar because I have little to no clue on what you just said
@wor53lg50 Жыл бұрын
@@mickmccrohononly an idiot would pretend his Scottish and fuk up the name so bad...
@1aberbeeg5 жыл бұрын
Remember going there many years ago and when they fired I thought the earth was going to split wide open.
@mcpraveen8 жыл бұрын
The best MBT of all time, look at how the tank stands like a rock when shells fire there is very little recoil
@fishnchips58267 жыл бұрын
its the best looking mbt aswell to be honest.
@cartesianoven26906 жыл бұрын
I really feel the leopard is just too good looking with the last armor upgrade though. But If war broke out, I would kill to be in a Challenger
@arvedludwig35846 жыл бұрын
@@cartesianoven2690 Rheinmetall upgrade is for 2a4 version. 2a5-2a7 remain. Can't wait for the next tank coming out between 2025 and 2030 with a Rheinmetall 130mm that is currently in development.
@cartesianoven26906 жыл бұрын
@@arvedludwig3584 Right? I think I heard it would be able to punch 50 percent more kinetic energy on AFPDS. Don't know if you have the same numbers or not.
@arvedludwig35846 жыл бұрын
@@cartesianoven2690 i forgot the numbers, need to look on the internet. When we talk about penetration, then surely it will have more since there is a higher kinetic energy. A proper response to the T14. It will have an autoloader too and the tank is a joint venture between German and French manufacturers. Other interesting thing will be the engine. Will it be a turbine or a diesel.
@challyho63755 жыл бұрын
Nearly 75 tonnes with its full kit on what a beast
@bikelifewill64835 жыл бұрын
No, 72
@ScienceChap5 жыл бұрын
@@bikelifewill6483 that's nearly 75...
@cypher38745 жыл бұрын
Best tank in the world
@danbatesy54924 жыл бұрын
And best looking
@franciscocisneros39533 жыл бұрын
don´t forget M1A2 abrams and LEOPARD 2A7
@jedblavla52062 жыл бұрын
Love how hes talking about the round 20ft from two firing tanks. Brilliant
@jaymac72032 жыл бұрын
What a guy 😭
@reservafederal55252 жыл бұрын
Perú: I am Peruvian,Perú can buy Type 31 Leander frigates or another model, and we could also buy Challenger 2 tanks from England because they are good candidates for Peru. I will not comment more on military channels. I have already stopped publishing on military channels. because I am busy, that is why I publicize in this way, now due to future wars for water and natural resources in Latin America Peru must buy all kinds of heavy military material from any country in this case English frigates and tanks I would say they are the best candidates for Peruvian armed forces, Peru used British military weapons in the Cenepa armed conflict we used British Canberra fighter-bombers It should be noted that Peru shot down 7 aircraft to Ecuador and Ecuador shot down 6 aircraft to Peru, but Peru won because we Peruvians kept territory Tiwintza, returning to the theme of the Type 31 Leander frigates England offered Peru these frigates to replace the Peruvian fleet that is made up of the lupo class, consolidating renewal and to arm the Peruvian armed forces, I understand that it can be built in SIMA PERU, and Technology transfer can be done with Bae Systems, Cammell Laird, they are partners, they won an international tender in 2020, I understand that the cost of the Type 31 Leander Frigate is 350 million dollars, the FREMM frigates The F-100 Frigates of Spain are between 850 and 900 million euros It is not 400 or 600 million euros as some say, the FREMM frigates are very expensive from 700 million or more in euros, they are also expensive a cruise ship sank a ship from Venezuela coming from Navantia Spain, that is why the best candidate for the Navy of Peru is the English frigate Type 31 Leander is modern, it has good technology for the Peruvian Navy we must acquire when there is a budget later the Type 31 Leander 1, 2 or 4 English frigates, depending on the budget that Peru has and in terms of the English Challenger 2 tanks They are good candidates for the Peruvian Army and Peruvian Armed Forces. The price per unit is 5 or 7 million dollars. Its cost is around there. It has good armor, good technology, and is considered one of the best tanks in the world. It is also expensive, but it is a good tank, I think it weighs 62.5 tons, but it has a lot of armor and it also has real combat experience used in Iraq, the important thing is that it has been used in combat I think they have 148 tanks the country Oman also uses these tanks, hopefully Peru and England reach an agreement later and a new Peruvian president buys about 60 Challenger 2 tanks this would be accompanied by the construction of hospitals and schools, the United Kingdom is also the main responsible for the reconstruction of the North of Peru by British companies. Regarding the tank candidates for Peru, all tanks, whether new or second-hand, are expensive, maintenance is expensive, the Peruvian military has already said that they will never buy tanks from Russia again, Black tanks South Korean Panthers are expensive, they are 85 million dollars and on top of that it is very expensive to pay more than necessary and they still do not export to other countries due to their high cost, French Lecrerc tanks are just as expensive everyone knows that in France nothing is cheap, after Turkish Altay tanks no because a Turk refused to sell new ships to Peru in the Pacific war Peru and Turkey have a good alliance but when it comes to buying tanks or spare parts, components there could be problems with the Turks, Merkava IV Israel no transfer technology and there would be problems in the bidding and the Abrams tank from the United States not because everyone already knows the Americans, even though you are an allied country of the United States, they impose restrictions and prohibitions to all, Peru is an ally of United States, a Peruvian ambassador named Rivera Shreiber warned the US months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Peruvian was honored in the US now returning to the subject, that is why the best candidate for the Peruvian Army is the English tank challenger 2 Hopefully when Peru has a budget with a new Peruvian president, Peru buy Type 31 Leandre frigates or another model and name them Martin George Guisse and Miguel Grau, British Englishman George Guisse was the founder of the Peruvian Navy with Jose de San Martín The Englishman George Guisse fought against France, he also fought against Napoleon Bonaparte and later he fought against the Spanish,Another thing would also be good to buy Challenger 2 tanks and name William Guillermo Miller and Francisco Bolognesi, because the English William Guillermo Miller was the designer of the Peruvian military uniform of what is now the Peruvian Army, Miller helped José de San Martín to liberate Peru in its independence, Peru has a lot of influence, English doctrine and tradition, British Miller fought in the battle of Waterloo, and also the English Guillermo Miller fought in the battle of Junín and Ayacucho, which were very important battles for independence of Peru, here in Peru there are always magazines and a lot of information saying that the English empire supported Peru to free itself from the Spanish empire, that is, it is obvious that we Peruvians are accepting England and George Guisse as Liberators of Peru because if not in Peru we would not they would be putting a lot of information about this and would say that independence was bought, which is not the case, it is already proven that independence England and the English did many things for Peru, as I have said on other occasions, although Simón Bolívar is the Liberator of Peru, England, the United Kingdom, the English people, and Argentina and the Argentine people are also the liberators of Peru. Although it is true that Peru and England are enemies, I say this because the English, the Falklands War, the Pacific War and the Pacocha battle are almost always talked about. I am Peruvian, this is the user Bomba atomica Racso and T-Rex, go back to watch military-themed channels with this user, this will be published on military channels, the Peruvian government believes that in 1975 to 1978, the Peruvian government wanted to acquire a aircraft carrier to England when Peru could have declared war on Chile, the English government had no impediment and the English said that if they could sell the aircraft carrier to Peru, Peru had the English Canberra fighter bombers and the Hawk Hunter to attack Chile, the English demonstrated once again that Peru and England are allies, the error came later with Belaunde Terry, who put Peru in the Malvinas, which Peru should have been neutral to improve the military alliance between Peru and England. Peru must be neutral and never get involved in the Malvinas conflict again. In the Pacific War and England's supposed financing of Chile in the Pacific War, I understand that England actually financed Peru and Chile, but the traitor Prado did not want to fully arm Peru, that is why we stopped being financed by England, In fact, the Huascar ship from Peru was English, Bolivia was the only country that was not financed by the English, and England also retained two ships from Chile and Peru during the Pacific War, apparently England was neutral, also that Prado was of Chilean origin I betray leaving unarmed and bankrupt With very little weapons, we had nothing on us. Prado fled from Peru. finally england the English founded from cities, banks, companies, schools, Inca kola drink, they even made football popular in Peru among many other things, etc. Thanks to England, Peru and Peruvians exist without England, Peru would not exist, it would continue to be a colony of Spain. This is reality, everyone knows this, that is why England should be the new liberator of Peru, and make the English language official. in Peru in honor of England, Peruvians would speak in English and Spanish who knows this could happen in the future who knows because the reality is that England, George Guisse, José de San Martín and Simón Bolívar would continue to be the liberators of Peru, perhaps in the future England becomes the new liberator of Peru and history can be taught in schools and in all parts of Peru. Finally to add the British admiral Frederick Stirling, the French Du Petit Thouars, the Italian commander Labrano, as well as the ministers plenipotentiary of Great Britain and France, intervened to prevent Lima from being violently taken. You can see another support from England to Peru, in addition to Englishmen, Englishmen and Italians fought against Chilean soldiers in Lima, one or more Englishmen died in real combat and also Italians died in combat, also English sailors and Italian sailors landed due to the obvious attack Chilean. occupation in Lima, I understand that in the battle of San Juan and Chorrillos Peru used British Nordenfelt machine guns, In addition, it is all interests, in any case England supported Peru in the Pacific War I hope that in the future Peru and England improve the military and economic alliance Greetings from Lima Perú!
@nealkirkland13134 жыл бұрын
Yes... top secret armor. Thank ya’ll. PLEASE don’t stop your armor (including mobile tanks!) development. God Bless the UK!
@lordemarsh68045 жыл бұрын
One beautiful tank next to the leopard
@mrcaboosevg60892 жыл бұрын
When you watch footage of the old WW2 tanks it's a very dramatic display, modern tanks just look solid
@MajSolo Жыл бұрын
feeling these shockwaves is why some people are in the army. Cause it is all fun as long as there is peace. The fealing is great and helps you digest your lunch.
@bicolouredprawn4 жыл бұрын
Nostrils flared to maximum in true Rimmer style.
@johnadams72504 жыл бұрын
When in Canada in the Eighties (Batus) with the Chieftain a troop leader opened up on the Range Safety vehicle that had been left as it had broken down , made a right mess, he got ripped for quite a while 😁😁
@ramslade4 жыл бұрын
That turret traverse is so fast
@Dragsterking1097 жыл бұрын
the challenger 2 is 62.5 tons
@jamesglass8957 жыл бұрын
In War weight is is probably way over 70 Tonnes. With all the added on Armour...Heard possibly 75 Tonnes?.
@thewomble15097 жыл бұрын
The basic gun tank is 62.5. Megatron, the one with all the add on armour and other additions is actually 74.5 tonnes.
@clipperxa92146 жыл бұрын
Before I even watch this...is that Rimmer?
@simonjackson72695 жыл бұрын
It is your Smeg head!!!
@TheOneAndOnlyLewis8 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, though it seems odd that its being compared to WWII tanks. Its obvious that it would be far superior, I feel it should be compared to its predecessors and its competitors. Though, it isn't much of a competition, I feel bad for any tank that isn't the Challenger II.
@wernotdonewithu31328 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I found that a bizarre comparison too. The concept behind the Challenger II, the main battle tank, didn't even exist until the 1960's and even then it was neither fully understood nor implemented. I also find it strange he mentions the Tiger as some German equivalent of the M4 Sherman or the T-34. Both of the latter were medium tanks and the workhorse and backbone of their respective armoured divisions. The Tiger was a heavy tank and only 1347 of them were made. The backbone of the German armoured divisions were the StuGIII, of which 9400 were made, the Panzer IV with 8800 made and the infamous Panther medium tank of which around 6000 were made. People frequently mention the Tiger as if it was common and as if had but a negligible impact on the fighting in the war itself. You're quite right about the Challenger II. On itw own and in a single tank vs tank engagement it might very well come out on top against any other tank in the world. However, as we all know, tactical deployment due to its limited numbers might be a serious drawback in any larger battle. Though fair enough those are become a thing of the past in today's modern surgical strike warfare. For the needs of the British army it certainly is ideal and without peer.
@tesstickle72678 жыл бұрын
Lewis Wright think because the programme is to do with old tanks lol think he's using it as just an example of where tanks are now
@catlee80647 жыл бұрын
You need to watch the whole program, its about the evolution of armoured vehicles.
@jammydodger14497 жыл бұрын
I would say these tanks from WWII are extremely famous and thus that's why they may draw comparisons between this and older tanks, for the sake of audience, not fact or fairness.
@ThatsOk837 жыл бұрын
Lewis Wright Exactly what I was thinking. When I heard tiger, tiger II, sherman, and T-34 I was like wtf?
@jjt10934 жыл бұрын
Awesome machine from a former Zipper head, BUT I still love the scream of the Chieftan
@TheWopper783 жыл бұрын
That’s a BAD ASS TANK!!!!!!!! Glad the Brits play on our team!
@steveaustin93865 жыл бұрын
Actually the infantry is the backbone of all modern armies.
@liamblackburn49684 жыл бұрын
Infantry is tank fodder 😂
@Squadaholic4 жыл бұрын
Top secret armor...... 3 seconds later"Dorchester armor"
@danghj8644 жыл бұрын
Yea but we have 0 fuckimg idea what it’s made off, all u know is a name
@Squadaholic4 жыл бұрын
@@danghj864 True🤔
@co87833 жыл бұрын
@@danghj864 we have a rough idea of it's effective thickness though. So we can make some educated guesses
@mikeyoung76604 жыл бұрын
A beautiful piece of military hardware love it
@memegod44334 жыл бұрын
Never lost one in combat!
@2706mauricio6 жыл бұрын
I love tank's and Challenger got the "Challenge" of keep the history of success
@Rusty_Gold855 жыл бұрын
I have no idea why the Australian Army bought the M1 .Apparently they didnt have Transporters to match so they had to buy those as well . Anyone know more fill me in
@simonjackson72695 жыл бұрын
My sister's house is about 15 miles from this range.... You can feel the concussion from there!!!
@empire-classfirenationbatt26914 жыл бұрын
Now how is that possible
@davidcostello25253 жыл бұрын
Don’t talk bollocks!! I was based at Lulworth, and our windows only just vibrated when the firing was going on, and I was a lot closer than 15miles!!
@Smoking_Joe2 жыл бұрын
It's Rimmer off Red Dwarf!........or indeed the comedy actor and impressionist, Chris Barrie.
@joshuaparker5526 жыл бұрын
May be old but absolutely insane the amount of power it can deliver its defo most accurate furthest range may have couple weak spots at rear and floor but no other tank is hitting this before challenger totally destroys opponent instantly guaranteed also at night over 70 rpg had hit this and still worked lol good luck 70 RPG would probably been a test and can’t wait until upgraded and Germany has invested just now in this monster lol
@sprinter18325 жыл бұрын
The only Challenger " knocked out" in combat, was a blue on blue error by another Challenger!
@LunaloonandIzzydizzy5 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: The glass was a paid actor
@greencommando26744 жыл бұрын
Good explanation. From Malaysia I will subcribe 👍
@ihavenocreativity26664 жыл бұрын
Damn look at the size of that lower plate
@MrBoringcabbage6 жыл бұрын
I think we can all agree that the archer was the best tank we ever made.
@toker66644 жыл бұрын
Nooooo chieftain
@AWMJoeyjoejoe3 жыл бұрын
Centurion.
@qasimmir7117 Жыл бұрын
What? The one that had the gun facing backwards?
@megakirbo4250 Жыл бұрын
@@qasimmir7117 Yes, that one.
@bwianbiccus5 жыл бұрын
smoke me a kipper I'll be back for breakfast :)
@edward.m.r43904 жыл бұрын
Legend
@smokemeakipper83724 жыл бұрын
Best quote
@jakedenis45796 жыл бұрын
Nah fam gota have that sturmpanzer 2
@trashpanda-sg2xh5 жыл бұрын
Outdated by a long shot
@combinedingredients22944 жыл бұрын
@@trashpanda-sg2xh Outdated? You're a fucking idiot. The Sturmpanzer 2 is the most modern vehicle to this day.
@themintaddict20905 жыл бұрын
Of course its faster than m4 sherman and T34 If they had tech to make it faster they would use it.
@ramslade4 жыл бұрын
yes.
@PSUK7 жыл бұрын
Looks like Lulworth range to me!
@lloyd97106 жыл бұрын
It is lulworth
@ibrahimdeniz73082 жыл бұрын
4:01 Imagine this is the ad from the manufacturer to the government
@randomlymadeanimations526 жыл бұрын
Best demo of a tank EVER.😂👌✌️PERIOD.!!!
@comicmania200810 ай бұрын
Looks like a couple of shots 'bounced' off the target and didn't penetrate!!! What's the noise like inside the tank for the crew?
@thewomble150910 ай бұрын
Actually , it's surprisingly quiet. There are a few vids around on YT showing firing from inside the turret. Outside, it sounds like the World just exploded!
@geobadger55264 жыл бұрын
1:38 caught him off guard
@HydroSnips5 жыл бұрын
That’s the Lulworth Range. All the times driven by there, never seen a tank that isn’t a gate guard or live firing. Dammit.
@800dbcloud36 жыл бұрын
Pretty much any modern mint can get the job done well and while the challenger 2 definitely has a powerful gun it’s in need of an upgrade to a smoothbore gun to allow it to be more versatile and the Dorchester composite armor is probably the best in the world it’s engine is where the main problem is 1200 horsepower is powerful but the tank is far too heavy to have a weaker engine than most mbts like the Abrams or the Leo with their around 1500 horsepower engines
@sublicense18a135 жыл бұрын
Smooth bore is better at shorter ranges but if you want accuracy with any type of HE at longer ranges you need rifled barrel. The British army wants versatility.
@Stoner_95197 жыл бұрын
I cant wait to get in this thing just joined the royal armoured core best tank in the world I think!:)
@jamesglass8957 жыл бұрын
Sadly Hayden...with Britain we don't spend the Money? Everything moves on...The Armour is till the dogs bollocks but the gun and the electronics and power pack are now getting old. I was on Chieftain and Challenger 1. Sadly due to the improvments to Ammunition? The new Long Prenitators...(bad spelling i know...had brain injury in service....bad spelling) They can't be used on the Challenger 2 because they won't fit in the breach. The Challenger 2 neads to be over hauled. Everything moves on mate. We hadly have a Royal Armoured Corp anymore...all the cut backs and amalgamations over since 1993. No BAOR, NO 1 BR CORP Either. But i wish you well in your Carear mate. Served in the 4 Royal Tank Regiment and the 1st Royal Tank Regiment. Salute.
@timmytwatcop87644 жыл бұрын
@@jamesglass895 I was in the TA in the early 1970s ( 21 SAS), loads of money for training, overseas 2 or 3 times a year, getting on regular army courses was easy, no problem with parachute training/ requals.. Now the military has been cut to a shadow of itself
@davidbarrett14874 жыл бұрын
Our tanks are bloody good as are the Brit crews. Brit armour plating is good too. Ask the soldiers about future warfare,? What arms tactics, drones, aircraft missiles , camouflage , electronics etc? You still need soldiers to take a territory, you still need tanks in my book, as you still need a navy, you have to protect sitting ducks.
@UnSovereignedCitizen695 жыл бұрын
Structurally speaking in terms of armour layout, it seems to be a superior design compared to Abrams. Smaller and better sloping
@qasimmir7117 Жыл бұрын
Sloping is not relevant to composite armour. What you see on the outside is just a facade, it’s not how the turret actually looks.
@megakirbo4250 Жыл бұрын
@@qasimmir7117 And correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these new types of tank rounds make sloped armor ineffective?
@justaguythatwasbored14603 жыл бұрын
Guy on youtube: "A fin stabilised sabot round" Any war thunder player or tank nerd: "Actually, it's an APFSDS 'shell', or armour piercing fin stabilised discarding sabot round
@allenji7105 жыл бұрын
Rifled gun FTW, Royal Ordinance.
@stirfriednoodls5 жыл бұрын
The bob semple tank can easily destroy this thing
@kaiserwilhelmii18275 жыл бұрын
The Bob Semple tank can easily destroy any tank
@generalkenobi51735 жыл бұрын
Bob semple is like dropping a nuke into a war.
@ramilhernandez47835 жыл бұрын
Lol
@exsappermadman250555 жыл бұрын
No enemy tanks in reality can destroy this tank....But one of them almost destroyed a Sapper that fell off the back of it at 40 MPH.....
@misterofftopic4 жыл бұрын
@@exsappermadman25055 r/wooosh you dingus
@jackw57925 жыл бұрын
My dad had been in a challenger 2 in iraq getting rpgs shot at it pure madness
@liamblackburn49684 жыл бұрын
So was my uncle, he was telling me a bout one tank been hit by over 70 rpgs and was still operational. Clearly was only one place I wanted to be when I signed up. Unfortunately they wasn't used in Afghanistan
@pedrofridge65374 жыл бұрын
Liam Blackburn are you thinking of joining the army
@jackw57924 жыл бұрын
@@pedrofridge6537 i am actually in the process at the stage that im waiting to go on my 2 assessment day
@pedrofridge65374 жыл бұрын
Jack W good shit man , your gonna make this . what role are you taking
@jackw57924 жыл бұрын
@@pedrofridge6537 planning on me being a armourer and yeah thanks man 👍
@cuatbarbq4 жыл бұрын
The C2 is one of my favorite tanks, but comparing it to WWII-tanks is a little wrong. An unseren Leo2 kommt das Ding trotzdem nicht ran ;-)
@getsideways72573 жыл бұрын
A little? Might as well compare them to WWI tanks :)
@jayboschetti81056 жыл бұрын
I love your channel name
@khrystree92333 жыл бұрын
I liked Chris better in Red Dwarf, but this is a great video ☺️ K
@hollandfocus8 жыл бұрын
Brits certainly love the HESH!
@renorzeta8 жыл бұрын
That big chunk of metal cause by HESH is so big . i could imagine if the big chunk hit anyone in crew compartment .
@navnig8 жыл бұрын
That big lump of metal would certainly kill anyone in it's path but it's more often the smaller fragments that do the real crew damage.
@19Koty967 жыл бұрын
Say that to the crew of a Challenger 1 (or was it the second one?) that got hit by HESH in Iraq... Commander and gunner both instantly dead after a friendly HESH hit the TC's cupola.
@19Koty967 жыл бұрын
Oh, nice to hear the details, thanks. My point was that shit happens and in theory, anything can happen... but yes, practically useless. Still kind of usable against older western MBT's and all the left-over soviet mediums all around the world.
@beastclarke7 жыл бұрын
HESH would still be useful in some ways, as it sends fragments flying around the inside of the enemy tank which would easily kill at least 1 crew member
@derekrwatson3465 жыл бұрын
I will always choose the Abrams on account of being biased, but Challenger is absolutely bad to the bone.
@jethrowalrustittie56533 жыл бұрын
Did my trade firing on Lulworth good times.
@patchedupdemon71044 жыл бұрын
Is fear naught in one of those
@alpha1games4 жыл бұрын
Ayyyy forum lad
@gazza29334 жыл бұрын
Pity we didn't have something like these in WW2. British tanks compared with Nazis Germany. A joke if it hadn't been such a serious business. Great video! Thank you. 👍🏻
@mrcaboosevg60892 жыл бұрын
In 1945 Britain actually had a far better tank than Germany, it was just too late to see any real battles. Tanks like the Centurion were just way ahead of anything Germany had, they're also still in limited use today
@sinisabalentovic96174 жыл бұрын
Great tank for all times!!
@L0r0x_o4 жыл бұрын
It's just not the same with Rimmer doing the commentary
@ephraimjohnmartin85205 жыл бұрын
I wonder who will win in battle? T90 or challenger 2
@tytosdylan32514 жыл бұрын
can this take on the merkava?
@nick_stein6 жыл бұрын
I like this guys warm jacket. Can anyone tell me how you call a jacket like that?
@Keyswiz716 жыл бұрын
It's an Irvin Jacket, designed for RAF aircrew in WW2.
@WarfightersWorkshop6 жыл бұрын
2:05 did that shell just bounce?
@greva29046 жыл бұрын
Yep. a) they’re only firing practice rounds, and b) the derelict Chieftains they’re firing at on the range are full of concrete so they last longer
@Feakre9 ай бұрын
And it even has a built in kettle.
@tommyleesheils20617 жыл бұрын
Best MBT of all time! Quick, deadly, accurate and has never been destroyed in combat to enemy fire!
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
@daAnder71 and the Americans didn't do that?
@Prost_Kamerads3 жыл бұрын
It's stupid how he is comparing the Challenger 2 to tanks from WWII
@qasimmir7117 Жыл бұрын
Why?
@jaykassing49085 жыл бұрын
I love you so much Rimmer.
@markturner34 Жыл бұрын
Them darts remind me of the starstreak missile
@pof19913 жыл бұрын
The tank that’s being fired at is the one for me not much damage being done lol
@jaymac72032 жыл бұрын
What a guy 😭
@giuseppecasa35742 жыл бұрын
i consider this tank one of my favorites really powerful as armor it showed it in iraq i have a question is i hope someone will answer but if the challenger is hit by a javelin or nlaw at the top of the turret would it resist or be destroyed?
@gonzomuse2 жыл бұрын
I agree, I think the Challenger has stood up really well over the years. But a modern anti-tank missile like a Javelin or NLAW would destroy any existing tank, including a Chally 2 or 3, Leopard 2 or an Abrams. Even mythical beasts like the Armata! They are just really, really good at what they do, which is penetrate upto half a meter of armour! A lot more than is on the top of any turret. This is why people are now looking at active defenses for tanks like Israel's Trophy system. Quite cool, but they do mean troops can't be anywhere near a tank that is being attacked, so it messes a bit with the idea of combined arms.
@qasimmir7117 Жыл бұрын
It probably won’t survive the attack directly from the top.
@britishpeopleyellowteeth60716 жыл бұрын
my favorite tanks when it comes to looks: t90m challenger abrams
@generalkenobi51735 жыл бұрын
My favourite tank on looks t14 t90ms the t80 t72 then the challenger
@squalxy13153 жыл бұрын
I’ve never seen anything like this before
@Gattobuono Жыл бұрын
Why the hell do they keep making comparisons with tanks from WW2?
@robertsotkowsky79743 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why you don't show the target ? (: without it it makes no sense
@happalula8 жыл бұрын
"massive bore of 120mm, its 50% bigger than the gun on the Königstiger" ......... for this, i did math..... once.... and 88mm*1,5=132mm...... 120mm > 132mm...... yup.... obvious troll
@wiansnyders61247 жыл бұрын
Happalula he is also talking about the breach size and barrel length not just diameter
@19Koty967 жыл бұрын
he did say _almost_
@beastclarke7 жыл бұрын
How you EVER heard of: "rounding"
@PamweChete25035 жыл бұрын
120mm is a diameter not a length so the calculation is pie x r squared. 88mm = 6082mm2 120mm = 11309mm2
@Beta250trials5 жыл бұрын
Don't forget rimmer is a smeg heeeed
@nayanmipun67843 жыл бұрын
Silencer would do good for the tank firing
@oldmungral4 жыл бұрын
what is maximum range to target
@pvtmaguire9595 жыл бұрын
Love how the bloke compares a third generation mbt to ww2 tanks. Bet it’d wipe the floor with an ice cream van too
@grandad19826 жыл бұрын
Why is Rimmer in this video?
@alen_g16626 жыл бұрын
Is that a challenger 1 hull?
@_hector__5 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or are the shells going really slowly? Is it because they're test rounds?
@tjlocust5 жыл бұрын
Looks slow but they're very fast. Probably similar to a bullet, you just don't normally see it
@sublicense18a135 жыл бұрын
Probably firing HESH about 700 metres per second.
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
Hesh isn't very powerful so it doesn't have a high velocity
@bencrathern96547 жыл бұрын
God they sound nice
@jacc13b108 жыл бұрын
is the hesh rounds still effective against the modern (MBT) tanks ???
@catlee80648 жыл бұрын
Not really... HESH is mainly used for soft targets like Trucks, Arty etc, for dismounted infantry and fortifications.
@OiSam-ir9me7 жыл бұрын
Sany0 hesh is used for lighter armour such as bmp's and btr's for example and also for bunkers and area targets, the coax would be used for transport vehicles such as trucks, and the sabot for heavy armour.
@catlee80647 жыл бұрын
COAX has been noted as being ineffective against modern logistical vehicles due to the rise of MRAPs.
@beastclarke7 жыл бұрын
Yes, it shakes the enemy tank. Bits go flying off and kill the crew in side
@wraith01mg5 жыл бұрын
Its effective against russian and Chinese armour. And soft targets when used in the artillery role.
@crusader-j41264 жыл бұрын
It ticks all the boxes, in what makes a tank great Firepower: check :) Mobility: Check :) Armor: Che.... wait..... is the Lower glacius 70mm? 🤔 British Tank research and dev team: 😅 T-80B 3BM42 wants too know your location T90 Vacumm Wants too know your location any ATGM after gulf war Wants too know your location 0:40
@warlord1957114 жыл бұрын
Lower glacis plate is 76mm with Dorchester added on.
@bulgingbattery20505 ай бұрын
It is comparable to the Abrams in terms of it's defense capability.