Professor Brian Cox Speaker | Unravelling the Universe | Contact Agent

🔸 How To Hire Brian Cox as a Keynote Speaker
Please contact an agent at Champions Speakers for an official quote for your company event.
champions-spea...
Do not miss this new and exciting keynote speech from Professor Brian Cox, leading Physicist and expert on the Universe and space. Brian conducts an interesting and insightful speech discussing all things science, space and the physics behind it in a unique way that allows people of all levels to gauge an excellent understanding. Watch this video to find out more!
Subscribe to our KZbin channel to see our latest keynote speeches from top speakers, like Brian Cox!
🟠 SOCIAL LINKS 🟠
SUBSCRIBE to our KZbin Channel:
/ @championsspeakers
Follow us on Twitter!
/ champspeakers
Follow us on Instagram!
/ championsspeakers
🔸 Who is Brian Cox?
Famed physicist, Brian Cox, is the face of British science and broadcasting. He has presented several influential television programmes, educating and informing audiences of all ages. A hit with younger viewers, who gravitate toward Brian's eloquence and infectious passion for science, he is commonly booked to speak at schools. Embodying the wonders of discovery, Brian's onstage presence commands the stage, using his incredibly visual presentations to keep audiences hooked on every fact and theory. When booked for events, Brian reinvents that same magic on your stage, leaving your audience awe-inspired.
Brian is arguably best known for his programmes, which have become a staple of British television. Starting in 2005 on Horizon, he created the series Wonders of the Solar System, Wonders of the Universe and Wonders of Life, which exploded in popularity during the 2010's. Brian's programmes bridge the gap between science and the general public, increasing the accessibility of formerly complex topics, like physics and biology. His speeches follow a similar ideology, as Brian endeavours to inspire, rather than lecture, audiences through highly interesting anecdotes and facts.
Titled Science Britannica, Brian's BBC documentary further expands the reach of British scientific discoveries. In the show, he explores the contribution of scientists over the last 350 years, specifically the public's perception. In 2011, Brian presented Stargazing Live, an onstage exploration of the universe. It was co-presented by Dara Ó Briain, and featured celebrity guests who added a touch of glamour to the event. Brian is a regular TED Talk presenter, where he invites audiences to explore the universe's greatest discoveries, including the Large Hadron Collider.
Brian has provided an expert opinion on several modern current events, shining a factual, unbiased light through the fog of confusion. In recent years, he has vocally warned of the climate danger present on earth, inspiring many people to improve their lifestyle. In 2010, Brian was awarded the Institute of Physics Kelvin Medal and Prize, in celebration of his scientific programmes for the general public. He was later appointed OBE, followed by Best Presenter from the Royal Television Society. An event featuring Brian benefits from an award-winning, pioneering presenter, who is as entertaining as he is knowledgeable.
🔸 Who are Champions Speakers?
We are an industry-leading speaker bureau serving international clients in 66 countries worldwide. 18 years' experience has put us at the forefront of the marketplace, where we specialise in the supply of distinguished speakers.
Our KZbin channel is a hub of exciting interviews and exclusive footage of celebrities, sportspeople business leaders, public speakers and more.
We have worked with figures ranging from Dr Alex George, the UK's Youth Mental Health Ambassador, to Michelle Visage, the globally adored presenter - subscribe to our channel and stay up to date and see our latest videos!
This video was filmed on 2nd July 2017 and published in March 2024. The speakers featured on our channel are either managed by Champions, have worked with us in the past or are known to speak within the industry.
#briancox #professorbriancox #space #universe #blackhole #milkyway #galaxies #championsspeakers

[@championsspeakers]

Don’t miss your chance to hire Brian Cox for your event or conference! Simply contact Champions Speakers to secure your top speaker: champions-speakers.co.uk/contact

[@alessandrorossini8704]

The closing words from Feynman's book are so profound and true and beautiful... I'm speecless...

[@victoriarisko]

Wonderful lecture. Love BC

[@YouTubeAlex666]

I love our planet… and regardless of what we do to Earth and ourselves… ‘things can only get better’

[@PatHaskell]

That’s hilarious!!

[@paulmurphy8549]

You haven't watched the extended boxset of earth and solar system it don't end well

[@just.cruzin.]

Keep smiling Brian 😁👍

[@nellwhiteside3042]

Amazing - thank you.

[@alex79suited]

How many solar systems can we physically look at? Rings systems, EMFSYSTEMS. We'll get there eventually. There is no other choice as far as I can tell. If we want to travel in the infinite ♾️ vacuum space. Peace ✌️ 😎. Great talk, Brian is great at what he does, and we're lucky he shares with all of us.

[@jestermoon]

Absolutely 💯

[@Syv_]

Technically there’s only one solar system

[@andykear-zz3nh]

I have recently noticed that if you turn the famous light clock 90 degrees to the normal view, and explanation of time dilation, I.e. in the same direction as moving vehicle that time dose not slow down.... have you given this explanation any thoughts?

[@softshells]

We should take better care of this planet 🌍 it’s perfect for us.

[@carlogambino8109]

So if I run my four miles with a watch on my wrist and left behind a watch sitting in a chair outside for example,.then when I return from my run then the watch in the chair would have beat the time on my wrist?

[@knowledgerules2813]

@@carlogambino8109 absolutely correct. Only the difference would be so small you wouldn’t be able to see it on your watch. But use an atom-clock and in stead of running 4 mikes take a plane-flight for a couple of hours and you’ll see the difference.

[@isaqureshi7916]

Hear hear! Thank you so much for what you do Professor Cox. Absolutely brilliant and inspiring. One of your many true fans. From Canada 🇨🇦

[@ossiedunstan4419]

Cox is a liar nothing more and a hole lot more, I used to respect him until i spent 60 F`ing dollars on his creationist video called the Universe. Ask him for science on how hydrogen can form planets. NO other elements are needed as stated by him in his creationist video .

[@markrichter2053]

The argument of the ping pong ball bouncing on the table in a moving train doesn’t seem to me to demolish the concept of absolute space. This is because it’s merely a demonstration of how things are perceived differently by observers in different positions, simply as a function of their different perspectives. Their different viewpoints in no way invalidate the physical reality that the larger perspective trumps the smaller and the smaller perspective only works within the context of the larger. To suggest that the phenomenon that is merely a function of the limited perspective of observers in different viewpoints somehow changes the physical nature of space is a confusion of categories. One is about perception, while the other is about the actual shape of the physical universe regardless of how it’s observed.

[@CliffSedge-nu5fv]

Okay, where is the one true center of the universe that all observers must agree on?

[@willcarr3925]

@@CliffSedge-nu5fvgiven our limited perspective that is impossible to know. But if you had ultimate perspective, you could deduce that, assuming the universe is finite. Then you would also have knowledge of the true position of all objects

[@doc2590]

A moving clock shows that time slows down. So if that clock was moving fast enough then time would possibly or eventually stop. In that place of no time, we would have the realm, or dimension of infinity, no beginning and no end. Thats a bit of a mind blowing thought. No time means no beginning and no end. ummm interesting :)

[@MrSimonw58]

That's almost as long as my mortgage repayments

[@rhcpmorley]

Time is evidentially abstract. You can't 'slow down' an abstract.

[@doc2590]

@@rhcpmorley if it's abstract, how does gps systems work?

[@tinkiwhiskey]

There are only two ways to stop time. Through speed or through gravity. That's called time diltaion. But that doesn't mean that time stops for everyone and everything. That means tine only stops for u, because you are traveling at light speed or because you are inside a blackhole. But time still passes away for everybody else. That's why time is relative. So there would be a beginnig and an end, but not for you.

[@doc2590]

@@tinkiwhiskey wow, thx, great reply.

[@Kevin-hb7yq]

Amazing!

[@cheesecakej2840]

The galaxies started forming and cannot stop

[@Trystan3345]

What?

[@ohdearism]

Then how do explain entropy?

[@7350652]

thanks

[@Storbuki]

Hmm The question I have is if particles in a 3 dimensional plane can affect particles nearby on a 2 dimensional plane, then can't particles in a 4th dimensional space affect the particles in our 3 dimensional space? Could the measurment of dark matter actually be the measurment of how the 4th dimension is affecting our own?

[@hansgeerdink3843]

Thank you. Question: Why is the universe shown always as unidirectional after the " Big Bang", instead as omni directional?

[@gerhardusvanderpoll]

Well to make it look omnidirectional you will have to be placed at the centre of the model which shows you a panoramic omnidirectional perspective.....but everybody else will not be at your vantage point to see the omnidirectionality which presents itself relative to your position...therefore,for the presenter to give/present everybody watching the presentation an omnidirectional view,he would have to provide each viewer with his own unique omnidirectional view relative to each one's relative perspective and position...which is impossible for him to do,due to the very nature of the concept and meaning of relativity......

[@hansgeerdink3843]

@@gerhardusvanderpoll Thanks, that makes sense.

[@skeller61]

My first question, whenever I see that model of the universe and they tell us how much time elapsed when the universe first started expanding, is “Since time is relative to the observer, how can you give such time values (especially when they talk in very small fractions of a second.”). Where is the clock located when you say how long the dark ages lasted, for instance? Especially when it is espoused that time slows down drastically when entering a black hole.

[@knowledgerules2813]

Don’t tell me you believe the dark ages are moving relative to us here and now. Think again about perspective and relativity.

[@skeller61]

@@knowledgerules2813 I simply asked the question, since science lecturers frequently state what happened in the first fractions of a second after the Big Bang. What reference are they using for those time references, since we learned from Einstein that space and time are relative. I don’t believe the question has anything to do with the dark ages. I’m just wondering the observer’s position that would yield these extremely short time periods of such rapid expansion.

[@stonecoldfloors8200]

​@skeller61 the clock is the one that you carry with you. It's all relative to you. (and everyone else's clock is the same as yours relative to the rest of the universe because we're all bound to the earth).

[@skeller61]

@@stonecoldfloors8200 I understand the concept of time being relative to the observer, my question is, when scientists give presentations, they often talk about what happened in the first tiny fraction of a second after the “big bang”, , from what perspective are you witnessing that these events took place in this (extremely short) amount of time? We cannot be talking about “earth time”, since we can’t observe that time (at least now).

[@stonecoldfloors8200]

@@skeller61 I think we ARE talking Earth time. What other time can WE be talking..? I think that was my point. If you think I'm wrong you'll need to speak to someone who understands it more than me.. that's all I've got.

[@iamthewalrus7269]

This guy reminds me of the grate Carl Sagan

[@BradleyCoopertest]

Crazy to think that if we could move at (almost) the speed of light; we would live 500 thousand years. Time dilation is such a weird concept.

[@nem447]

Meanwhile garbage content gets hundreds of millions of views, so sad...

[@ciarandevine8490]

Maybe its just that the obvious is only obvious from how we see the universe. From your linear Space/Time experience, the perspective, that you have created with the experience of linear Space/Time you can create the idea that something comes before, then next, then after. This is an illusion. Your higher, open mind, experiences all your moments, all your lives at once. This means you can connect with other lives and other experiences because they all exist NOW. Only in NOW can you understand how life works. Einstein's theory of Space/Time, his mathematics is fantastic, GPS and everything else is based on it. But it has it limits and it all collapses at 10 to the minus of 33cm and 10 to the minus 43 seconds. Reality is way more complex and way more exciting than present scientists understand.

[@daisieb7547]

Actual it's just that distribution would drive me to study more which I cannot do in a vacuum...which is someone else's fault...

[@carolspencer6915]

💜

[@hyperhybrid7230]

Approx 36:20 the Cambridge analysis, that cliche again Subjective & Relative, relating to the famous boat race, those winning ladies had nice shaped legs and thighs in boots, is this true or false.

[@CliffSedge-nu5fv]

An opinion is neither true nor false.

[@janettempest716]

Black holes doorway to another universe 🤷‍♀️

[@nicolapage1131]

❤

[@daisieb7547]

Gosh I mean I believe u sorta.

[@grahamhill9770]

Every politician on this planet should be forced to watch this and questioned upon the subliminal message within.... If they fail to answer correctly they are stripped of all their ill gotten gains and cast out onto the streets with nothing....

[@daisieb7547]

Hey.... Mr.....mister..... what's gonna happen?

[@daisieb7547]

Bedone...

[@DerrickMapps]

David Deutsch he's the ma man

[@daisieb7547]

This better be real research. 😂

[@ciarandevine8490]

Brian, we love you, but time is not linear and space/distance is an illusion, but both are experienced as real in 3D. 🎉

[@petermurphy1484]

Pop scientist literally

[@MaryJones-d7e]

Davis Donald Garcia Karen Lopez Richard

[@eddyimpanis]

Consciousness is not emergent, it’s transcendent.

[@jennynormoyle9724]

Please explain.

[@gerhardusvanderpoll]

Consciousness is emergent...and after it has emerged transcendence follows...

[@eddyimpanis]

There can be no beginning without consciousness.

[@eddie1975utube]

@@eddyimpaniswhy not? I don’t know any law of physics that requires this. Sounds like BS.

[@CliffSedge-nu5fv]

Deepity nonsense.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Love your work Professor Brian, but Wheeler's One Electron Theory Wave-packaging is exactly what Feynman's Diagrams are in vertically integrated differentiates of temporal superposition thermodynamical relative-timing ratio-rates, vertices at Singularity-point holes in vortices nodal-vibrational holography-quantization. QM-TIME superposition identification of Electron-photon-phonon-Proton oscillation in Neutronic units of e-Pi-i omnidirectional-dimensional logarithmic condensation modulation, is self-defining explanation of what you see, "everything is connected Wave-packaging floating in Absolute zero-infinity Entanglement Aether Actuality. The "Hard" Mind-Body Problem is one resonance re-cognition of self in Self, a Timey-Wimey, superimposed line-of-sight image of Bose-Einsteinian Condensation, Hydrogen Atomic Structure Vortex. If it's fun to imagine why it's always all-at-once sync-duration holography dimensionality, only images of pulse-evolution coherence-cohesion objectives floating in flat-space, Singularity-point Lensing of Superspin orientation by i-reflection potential positioning possibilities, complex bio-logical re-evolution containment in No-thing. Simple to observe, not even slightly easy to analyze, which is why Math-Physics is the business.

[@kotsosttr8648]

There are still people who take this guy seriously??

[@DougDesHarnais]

And you read the Bible? 😂

[@kotsosttr8648]

​@@DougDesHarnaisYou don't?

[@holderoftheshares1257]

He It is a Hell of a lot smarter than you.

[@gregwilkes2936]

This guy is very brilliant and you should pay attention to what he has to say.

[@Dan-g3b4w]

Anyone with intelligence who doesn't believe in fantasy beings....yes

[@rhcpmorley]

Here's the quote from Brief History of Time that you should focus on, it is on page one '...Time, whatever that is...' Hawkin admits to not knowing what Time actually is. How do you build hypothesis on such dodgy foundations? The word Time and the word Space are both homonyms i.e. they both have more than one core meaning. If you can't /don't describe the different meanings, you literally don't know what you are talking about. Space references spatial position (hence xyz-axis), Time references change (and change is reference frame e.g. quantum specific). Hence Spacetime references changing spatial position aka (relative) motion. You think Time and Space are fundamental. They are not. Spatial position refers existence, mass, and change refers energy differential. Energy differential is fundamentally what 'is' everything. You're welcome.

[@kyriakoskitsios]

Many phisicists do not consider time as a dimension or physical quantity like x,y,z space dimensions. It is an invention so they can solve the equations. So time does not exist. Even in linear algebra there is no time.

[@danielpaulson8838]

Time is required for the movement through space. The universe is expanding which means it is always moving as are we. As that happens, time emerges as a by-product. We cannot travel through space without time emerging to do it. Time and space are certainly fundamental and we experience them both through simple observation.

[@rhcpmorley]

@@danielpaulson8838 'Time emerges' ?? What does it look like? What is it made of??

[@danielpaulson8838]

@@rhcpmorley It’s made of time. Thinking wasn’t even required on that.

[@rhcpmorley]

@@danielpaulson8838...clearly no thinking done. Define / describe precisely, unambiguously and empirically what you mean by the word Time, else you don't know what you are talking about. The only evidence of 'time passing' is change; quintillions of individual change events. Look around you. The evidence is ubiquitous and undeniable...

[@daisieb7547]

Yea but... u should color ur hair like a blonde streak in the middle front... that would be cool... then when ur talking I can pretend I'm interested in distribution my head doesn't go blank and I get distracted by what sort of chemical did u use ta color it... duh...