Charlie Kirk Crushes Leftist 'Intellectual' Who Tries To Outsmart Him -

[@TopherToke]

Wow that girl that took the hat should be suspended form the college. These schools need to start taking student discipline seriously.

[@alextrabeck9143]

Screw that Charlie.... let them detain that idiot that ripped your hat off and press charges.... I am tired of turning the other cheek. That woman will continue to do that until there are consequences for her bad behavior!

[@patrioticz2858]

3:08 "let her have her emotions man" lol. She can have her emotions but it doesn't give her the right to assault someone, take and damage property.

[@tomm9493]

Exactly right.

[@kennethclark9157]

What has happened to people that they think there are no consequencies. Oh, because they're aren't. I would have decked anubody that did that to me!

[@stephenweir9871]

​@Typecast-L that's violence

[@patrioticz2858]

@stephenweir9871 he isn't saying it isn't, he is just saying if he got a taste of his own medicine

[@stephenweir9871]

@patrioticz2858 Taste of his own medicine Wait, so who's face did Charlie hit, for that silly woman to attack and assault him define what you mean by taste of his own medicine

[@bodyxcount22]

Hmmm...out of that whole interaction, I wonder who has family here illegally. Maybe the reasonable young woman who assaulted him for wearing an ICE hat? Forget the fact they go after terrorists and human traffickers, all she cares about is her friends and family who got caught here illegally.

[@iloveTRUMP]

If you had grabbed a hat off HER head she would have laid down in the road and screamed for the police that she hates!!! 😂😂😂

[@jaimepebley3490]

Yup. How much you wanna bet her name is Karen? LOL! 🤣

[@sadoldgit313]

Ah! The faux intellectualist strategy of keep on talking so your argument cant be refuted!

[@danielkrause1357]

I have a coworker like that.

[@jaimepebley3490]

One of my top pet peeves. God gave us two ears and only ONE mouth. I don't think that is a coincidence. Stop talking over people and listen! Ugh!

[@chrisparker7815]

Oh the "Tolerant Left".. So welcoming of others views..🤢🤮

[@edenseal]

So based on the guy talking to Charlie... we're judged by the sins of our ancestors? We're screwed.

[@Mojojojo335]

Wait until he finds out his ancestors sold other blacks into slavery

[@moose5204]

If that dude was an intellectual, Then I'm a Kryptonian ....

[@seasonedbeefs]

So yeah let's look at the crime rate and put all their children in jail too

[@usedcarsokinawa]

As a Christian, why would your color or race matter? The bible says he doesn't pick one race over another.

[@Xani13]

Exactly. We are all the same in the eyes of God.

[@Steven9567]

it does matter otherwise why he separated us?

[@Xani13]

@@Steven9567 Simple: To prevent our reunification creating another Babel incident.

[@williamsaldanah3554]

This reminds me of the jailhouse scholars, trying to sound educated but fail miserably when they open their mouths.

[@paulroberts7544]

I don't know whether he was trying to sound educated, but he was certainly talking sense. Charlie wasn't. The problem with Charlie is he is a religous fundamentalist. He bases everything on his premise that God exists. To the people that don't believe God exists - he sounds illogical and often deranged. Belief in God is subjective - a feeling. Belief in God is akin to a biological man FEELING that he is a woman trapped in a man's body. One day both might be proven right, but until we have hard evidence it's just a subjective belief.

[@patrioticz2858]

@@paulroberts7544 lol you thinking he was talking sense means you have nome

[@patrioticz2858]

@@paulroberts7544 and when that day comes it will probably too late for people like you 🤷‍♂️.

[@patrioticz2858]

@@paulroberts7544 also then the man was talking about the Bible, which he was kinda ignorant of, but Charlie refuted what he said by directly Quoeting and talking from scripture because the man was bringing up scripture.

[@koberino4872]

I guess the lady at the end is against the war on sex trafficking lol

[@BigggB3ar]

She was most likely an illegal.

[@bttr2brnout792]

She thinks rape trees are a part of life that needs to be gotten use to.

[@markalan3108]

that's some shit security if they are allowed to get that close

[@rutherfordBHAZED]

notice how the numskull was condoning the behavior of the hat snatching miscreant? SMH

[@BigggB3ar]

It's because he's probably in BLM. He probably participated in the summer of love in 2020. As long as you agree with his/their ideology, you're fine. That girl was probably illegal, that's why she swatted Charlie's hat. The left preaches tolerance when they're the furthest from it. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.

[@truthisthevictory9278]

'Political violence is tolerated.'

[@fastlanejunkygsxr9123]

That guy is a idiot, he said thats not right what the lady did but you have to let her have her emotions. 100% the dude was raised by his mother with no father around.

[@BigggB3ar]

The left is all emotions and no sense.

[@craftyourwaytopeace]

Charlie there has never been another perfect person but Jesus to walk this earth. Period!

[@marklewen9384]

I couldnt imagine what would happen to me if i moved to mexico ILLEGALLY, and trashed their law enforcement in a viral video?? I bet the Federales would just love it...

[@michaeloday466]

Try that in a Small Town.🤠

[@dongrub2810]

God's judgment is never wrong spoon.

[@ryanhaase1271]

'Intellectual' is quite a stretch..

[@kadimusbaratheon7352]

The fact we live in a world where women can do stuff like that and not get any consequences for it is the reason why I don't bother with people anymore. We should just watch the world burn.

[@jonanderson5809]

The poor dude on the left looks completely uncomfortable standing there supporting his friend.

[@elijahweems1315]

She was 9

[@Jeremy-Two]

I love you, Charlie Kirk. Jesus saves in more ways than one.

[@aj-2savage896]

To be fair, this was not a fair fight. Intellectually.

[@KenUbeleveit1]

When people cite portions of the Bible without differentiating between descriptive texts and prescriptive text. Usually it's people who act like they know a lof but this is one area where they like nuance.

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

So is this passage "descriptive" or "prescriptive"? 1 Samuel 15:1-3 (NASB95): 1 Then Samuel said to Saul, “The Lord sent me to anoint you as king over His people, over Israel; now therefore, listen to the words of the Lord. 2 “Thus says the Lord of hosts, ‘I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he set himself against him on the way while he was coming up from Egypt. 3 ‘Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.’ ”

[@KenUbeleveit1]

@@talibabdulhaqq7513 descriptive. Remember, not all narrative is normative. That passage is not a commandment to Christians.

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

@@KenUbeleveit1 so it was not a prescription from the Triune God worshipped by Christians to those that followed him at the time? Was it morally just for the Triune God of the Christians to order it, or was it not? Or was it a mischaracterization of what the Triune God of the Christians ordered at the time?

[@KenUbeleveit1]

@@talibabdulhaqq7513 perspective for those specific individuals (OT Israel) not for NT Christians.

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

@KenUbeleveit1 one of the points Charlie tried to make, though, was a comparison/contrast between the character of Jesus and Muhammad. If the Christian doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation are true, then does that not mean that Jesus himself ordered, in this passage, the active killing of nursing infants and other children? Wouldn't a fair comparison of the character of Jesus and Muhammad, from a Christian perspective, include this as part of that comparison? (Also, including the prophesied deeds of Jesus at the second coming in Revelation and other passages of the Old and New Testaments?)

[@MrSmurfnanne]

The problem I have is the lack of contemporary accounts of a Jesus the Christ...

[@speedymarvin]

Hearing people make these kinds of arguments about the Bible when they obviously have no idea what they're talking about saddens me to no end. II Tim. 2:15 - Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

[@craftyourwaytopeace]

Isn't that the truth!!!!

[@xxxchurch100]

A fool finds no pleasure in wisdom but delights in airing his own opinion ..proverbs

[@MikeAndDrewPranks]

Charlie is absolutely right about the new covenant. Also, the line of David to Christ were all sinners. However, that’s why the virgin birth is so important. To Show that Jesus Christ was not conceived in sin.

[@mbjay1994]

That’s him crushing it lol 😂

[@reddmendoza6765]

He's in college and says "axed" instead of "asked".

[@ABESW0RLD]

That's not that deep mate

[@BAR55825]

Just proves that college is NOT teaching, but indoctrinating!!

[@sonsofgod5044]

DEMONS Always manifest in people when preaching about JESUS. The light always covers the darkness in people.

[@mannypele3582]

muhhmad married a 6 year old to correct you there charle lol

[@curtisbrown5939]

A goat didn't eat Jesus' notes

[@patrioticz2858]

1:51 What about your forefathers and ancestors? Africa and the Middle East started slavery.

[@BigggB3ar]

That's just a little inconvenient truth that the left / black people don't like to talk about. There's still slavery going on all over the world to this day. Especially still in Africa. African-Americans should help their brothers and sisters in Africa instead of whining about something they never experienced. Yes, slavery was wrong. But we corrected our forefathers' mistakes. We just can't dwell on it forever. Yes, it's part of America's history, but we have bigger fish to fry right now than slavery of the past. The emergence of China and allies is one of them. There are plenty of others too. But the elites like to keep us distracted with nonsense like gender neutral bathrooms instead of the real threats, them.

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

Slavery existed in widely separated cultures across the earth, for thousands of years. Even some Native American peoples had it, and it was developed independently from what was happening the Africa and the Middle East.

[@patrioticz2858]

@talibabdulhaqq7513 Yes, but the concept of the actual Slave Trade started there. "Native Americans" didn't really sell their slaves.

[@patrioticz2858]

@talibabdulhaqq7513 also I brought up Africa and the Middle East because his ancestry would be from there

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

@patrioticz2858 the Transatlantic Slave Trade, perhaps; but there was slave trade long before that. There was extensive slave trade in ancient Rome and elsewhere in Europe and Asia Minor long before that.

[@Philzoid]

The my fairy tale is better than yours argument lol

[@memphisdaniels3218]

Very rare for Charlie to be wrong about something but Mohammed married Aisha when she was 5 and consummated the marriage when she was 9

[@Sayfullah570]

Different narrations on age. The youngest is 6 and consummated after puberty at 9

[@Destr0Beatz]

Audio is trash

[@dilligaf73]

All other religions you are either born into or marry into. Christianity is a faith, not a religion

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

That's simply false. You can convert to Judaism, Buddhism, and Islam, and many other faiths as well. In fact, the only religion that I know of that actually prohibits conversion (and only the conservatives in it prohibit it) is Zoroastrianism. And yes, those are *faiths* and *religions*. And unless you want to get rid of James 1:27, Christianity is a religion as well.

[@timber72]

1. Muhammed married a SIX (6) year old, not a 12 year old (Aisha.) He consummated the marriage when she was 9. 2. Jesus IS, not "was", divine.

[@490Believer]

Jesus IS Devine, not was.

[@truescotsman4103]

Bad hat.

[@BigggB3ar]

Good hat. What's so bad about ICE? Please explain yourself, Scotsman.

[@MrAgonizomai]

Please stop labelling these videos as “Charlie Kirk crushes/DESTROYS/HUMILIATES [etc.] [whoever]”. It’s not honest. He stands his ground and shows where they’re wrong and (as in this video, and others) quite often gets some mildly violent (often verbally, sometimes physically) opposition. It’s disingenuous and unnecessary to over-hype what’s happening. This could just as well have been titled something like, “Charlie Kirk assaulted by woman while arguing against leftist ‘intellectual’ who thinks he’s smarter” That would still grab attention. You just need to put a bit more thought into your titles. Don’t be lazily hyperbolic.

[@amberlayne4206]

I could be wrong but I think it’s a play on how people used to title Ben shapiros clips

[@BigggB3ar]

It's just click-bait. It's just to get views, and it works. Don't take everything so literally. Peace.

[@paulroberts7544]

There is no objective way to compare religions and determine which is 'better'. That is entirely subjective. Charlie THINKS christianity is better, but not everyone agrees. The leftist is right! No approach to life is inherently better than another, so no one has the right to foist their values and beliefs on others. We either fight to the death for dominance, or we agree to tolerate each other and stay in our own lane.

[@Xani13]

Just like how you THINK the Leftist is right but not everyone agrees. Js.

[@patrioticz2858]

The left isn't tho, what you brought up is a right point u idiot. Also it isn't. Christianity is what the Constitution was based off of, same with the West's ideals in freedom. Kindness was considered a weakness before Christianity came along. Tho you are obviously ignorant about what you are talking about. Left believes agree with me or else.

[@Darksylux99]

That's not exactly true. If Objective Truth does exist in this world (and it does), then either ONE of the religions is right, or they are ALL wrong, and the truth has yet to be found. In this hypothetical, if we discovered one of them is right, would that just inherently make it the "best" religion, seeing as its origin, doctrine, and beliefs are all validated? For that matter, if the God of that religion dictates or claims a way of life as best, then it would be, as they have been the moral authority of this world, and therefore have the right to decide that. In Christianity's case, it is the most consistent and balanced of all beliefs, and acknowledges the impossibility of any human to accomplish the standard of morals set by God. No other religion has anything close to that level of self-realization or humility. Beyond a reasonable doubt, it has enough evidence to suggest its validity in terms of historical documentation and authenticity. I'm pretty sure that the religion that's actually true is the better one to follow. That isn't a subjective point, its fairly logical. Who cares if everyone doesn't agree? What ACTUALLY the truth?

[@tonyputman3398]

All religions make truth claims. Their truth claims contradict the other religions truth claims. If we study the evidence, we can use our rational, logical minds to determine which evidence is strongest to support the truth claim.

[@Gen-XTex]

Can’t win an argument dealing with religion. I’m neutral on Christianity, meaning that most folks that worship it are generally good folks. I’m absolutely against islam (lower case on purpose) because they are stuck in the 16th Century, at least, and the way they treat women is enough to make me to want them stamped out figuratively, and literally! Note: nobody that lived a mere 2,000 years ago could walk on water. The Romans kept really good records. There isn’t a single record made by a Roman Sentry (cop) where they reported seeing some supernatural thing on any given day. There is a record of Pontius giving the local Jews permission to crucify a guy named Jesus, that’s outside of the Bible, but no record of him raising from the dead. Only IN the Bible does that exist. Are we going to start believing in David Koresh after the same amount of time (~320 years) that it took to legitimize Jesus? Koresh said he was the son of God, too.

[@tonyputman3398]

I suggest you start at the beginning. Everything that has a beginning has a cause. What or who caused time, space, matter, energy to come into existence?

[@mjlvnv]

Look up the writings of Josephus. He wrote about Jesus and the things he did. Although far warning, he is rather on the boring side lol

[@Gen-XTex]

@@tonyputman3398 I fully and thoroughly believe in a Creator, I just don’t pretend to know him. It could be a dude on a cloud, it could be considered our sun. How would we know if a star is alive or not? They are born, have a lifetime, die, and in so doing, have offspring. It also enables our life to exist. We could be insignificant, barely conscious, dust swirling around in some pimple faced 9th graders’ Petrie dish experiment. I don’t know, but something larger than us certainly did all this. Most folks look in the garden for signs of God. They’ll never see him. When and if they realize that he IS the garden, they’ll at least know as much as I know.

[@Gen-XTex]

@@mjlvnv Can you chew that up a bit finer? Is it a book in the Bible that has now been removed from it at some point?

[@Gen-XTex]

@@tonyputman3398 Who are you suggesting to?

[@neeenonasser988]

Not true what he said about Islam!! And so out of context Come on Charlie you are smarter than that

[@johnowens5342]

So true, Mohammed's girl was 5 when married and 9 when he... well, we have a word for that.... I bet you know the word.

[@sfdoctorp]

WRONG --- Hinduism has exactly that. Krishna, a manifestation of God, came to us, and also died for our sins. Sorry Charlie, agree with you a lot, but you just ruled out a fellow monotheistic religion of 1 billion people. Hinduism holds many of same values --- and not only that, is the most tolerant as well. It's among the few that accept Christianity.

[@izzysnow4904]

Jesus said of Himself, "I am the Way, I am the Truth, and I am the Life. No one comes to the Father but through Me." Jesus will accept anyone who comes to Him. That's inclusive.

[@Steven9567]

and@@izzysnow4904

[@tosuchino6465]

@@izzysnow4904 No, you don't undersatnd. Hinduism is inclusive since it accepts christianity without provisions. Christianity always has one unavoidable provision for anyone to be included. You spelled out the provision yourself in your comment. That's not inclusive.

[@truescotsman4103]

Anybody who actually knows the Bible can destroy any apologist defending the Bible. Charlie Kirk shouldn't defend the Bible. He usually wins the debate but I would destroy him on religion.

[@izzysnow4904]

I doubt it.

[@truescotsman4103]

@@izzysnow4904 quite articulate. care to debate me?

[@peakyblunder4613]

​@@truescotsman4103I take it Izzy doesn't want to. 😂

[@truescotsman4103]

@@peakyblunder4613 "I doubt it".

[@abigailedwards3843]

​@@truescotsman4103 What do you have to say about religion?

[@truescotsman4103]

Charlie's arguments are so weak. I'm a patriot I'm an independent I'm conservative I agree with 99% of the stuff Charlie says. I'm atheist and I think some of the things he says about religion are absolutely absurd. It's time to actually wake up. You can't just kind of half wake up but still believe in religion. That's your Achilles heel.

[@izzysnow4904]

Your argument is weak, and btw he doesn't believe in religion, he believes in Jesus Christ.

[@truescotsman4103]

@@izzysnow4904 Many theologians believe "jesus" was a psyop created by the Romans to devalue and discount Judaism. Why are the Church's dogmatic propaganda beliefs being reinforced? We don't really know what happened back then but we know it was a shitshow. You can believe all you want I ask you to prove something to me and I'm the bad guy? Religion is completely backwards. It's a lie. Who's right?

[@rogerrabbit5014]

The difference between religion and Christianity is a religious person try’s to live by laws thus trying to earnGods grace and love, whereas a real Christian has a personal relationship with God thru His son Jesus Christ, and in the relationship God will show the things He wants you to leave behind as well the things He wants you to do or walk in. Easy Peasy

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

​@@izzysnow4904interesting. So you believe that James is teaching that religion is better than Jesus Christ? Or that people who follow Jesus need not visit widows and orphans or keep one's self unspoiled from the world? James 1:27 (NASB95): 27 Pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world.

[@talibabdulhaqq7513]

​@rogerrabbit5014 that's not what theBible says--it speaks highly of religion: James 1:27 (NASB95): 27 Pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world.

[@martinweber202]

remarried a 6 yr old had sex wither when she was 9 yrs old

[@BigggB3ar]

What a sicko. Maybe the dude was a pedophile. No one can defend that.

[@hugohernandez7953]

Dillusional, all about his hatred for a much cultured race of ppl.