Must What?

Рет қаралды 32,571

Chess Simp

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 137

@dudono1744 3 ай бұрын

Accidental drawback abuse from the first opponent, very rare.

@maze7050 3 ай бұрын

69th like, very rare.

@dudono1744 3 ай бұрын

@@maze7050 Technically only happens once per comment at most

@jeremyready8030 3 ай бұрын

From my experience it's very rare for your opponent to not abuse your drawback if revealed

@JB-my4pp 3 ай бұрын

@@jeremyready8030 That why I never reveal

@darkshoxx 3 ай бұрын

Jesus that last sequence was brutal 😆

@Mamenber 3 ай бұрын

I hope I'm not the only one who noticed that the decision to value the king as the most valuable piece cost Simp the first game, but gave him a free win in the third one.

@rydiafan1 3 ай бұрын

The drawbacks on this website absolutely are not balanced around being revealed.

@jeremyready8030 3 ай бұрын

They're also not necessarily balanced based on the scaling system itself

@EnverHalilHoxha1917 3 ай бұрын

Its cuz simps elo is high

@zranxsevengg652 3 ай бұрын

true testosterone

@canicalr 3 ай бұрын

It's almost as if you weren't supposed to reveal them!

@irgiefarras 3 ай бұрын

and he only play on this website by revealing his drawback

@gryllodea 3 ай бұрын

Wow that last game was clean

@nichodemus10 3 ай бұрын

The real comedy of it is that both challenges were ranked as very easy, while if revealed become about the most difficult you can have (evidenced by simp noting the inability to defeat an opponent who can get king to safety and also making each of his opponents moves forced)

@HeyBous13 3 ай бұрын

C4 is technically a bomb, not a volcano

@Drakojana 3 ай бұрын

I think the "active volcano" might be randomised, it just happened to be C4 in Simp's game lol

@tychozzyx9439 3 ай бұрын

You didn't hear about the automated bomb factory in the caldera? It went nuts and started spewing live munitions all around. Same difference, really

@littleladlarry 3 ай бұрын

fire comment

@roma540 3 ай бұрын

Now the question is WHO THE HELL DROPPED A BOMB INTO A VOLCANO?!

@mr.d8747 3 ай бұрын

*Love how in the third game he was able to use indormation he learned during the first game*

@EnverHalilHoxha1917 3 ай бұрын

I love indormation!!!!

@xelspeth 3 ай бұрын

He didn't learn it in the first game. The ruling that the king has higher value than the queen has been known for many videos

@Capzielath64 3 ай бұрын

Its probably specifically to avoid stalemates(or auto lose most likely) in drawbacks like the first game where if he lost his queen and then the opponent moved their queen he'd have no moves if the queen was the highest value.

@TlalocTemporal 3 ай бұрын

@@Capzielath64-- Specifically allowing kings in check to count for any movement drawback might work, or changing their value when in check. (A king in check is worth two in the castle).

@ipsylon9833 3 ай бұрын

I love how the king being considered the highest value killed your first game, but saved your last.

@aspzx 3 ай бұрын

I couldn't figure out what simp was doing at first in that last game but that was actually genius.

@scar6286 3 ай бұрын

1:50 The opponent could have moved only his king and taken all of Simp's pieces, while Simp would only have been able to shuffle his king back and forth.

@schwingedeshaehers 3 ай бұрын

he could have taken the king with the king xD

@1337foxs 3 ай бұрын

The third game was cyber bullying

@FoxSlyme 3 ай бұрын

The first game is basically a repeat of "How to FLEX in chess" from 5 days ago

@choco1101 3 ай бұрын

Looks like viewer copied from here.

@FoxSlyme 3 ай бұрын

@@choco1101 or the viewer could also have a similar idea with whoever made the drawbacks

@lmabacus404 3 ай бұрын

Though with the difference that the king is worth more than the queen, which makes a HUGE difference in gameplay. Also, the second game is an exact repeat of "You Need Good Computer For Chess" from three months ago.

@NimonoSolenze 3 ай бұрын

That second game was scary. If he dared to take your pawn with the knight and put your king in check, you would've lost had it given you any square that didn't allow you to move your king or queen

@Can-uj5pv 3 ай бұрын

That knight would not have been able to move to the king side to capture the king, due to his opponent's drawback though. But of course, Chess Simp did not know that.

@rraimundobruno 3 ай бұрын

Even if the knight got captured it would still be fine because I think the strategy there was to force the Queen out to maximize the number of random moves Simp was forced to make. Working around that drawback would still suck, tho

@mattevans4377 3 ай бұрын

The last guy just wanted you to feel better about the first match

@CommentPersonAndStuff 3 ай бұрын

"Do not attribute to genius what you can to pure chance." --Some GM (Probably)

@KudoShinichii1412 3 ай бұрын

0:25 that one episode of thus spoke kishibe rohan

@thaumaTurtles 3 ай бұрын

6:15 Gambler's Fallacy

@danieladmiraal9371 3 ай бұрын

Simp casually predicting the future with pawn e3 right before it became mandatory.

@BaconJake14 3 ай бұрын

Wow just as i was wondering where today's video was

@XGodXGod-nh8pb 3 ай бұрын

chess but you chose a piece or pawn after move 4, from move 5 on you are only allowed to move that piece or pawn if it is attacked and you can only move the king if it is not. you can move the chosen piece or pawn freely only when the opponent has equal or less points than you on the board

@MrJed87 3 ай бұрын

I love my beloved drawback chess.

@lmabacus404 3 ай бұрын

That checkmate came out of nowhere in the second game. I was so focused on how much material the random rolls were costing you that I completely missed the mate.

@dipperjc 3 ай бұрын

This was a beautiful video. The king being higher value than the queen was the theme; it screwed you in the first game, and saved you in the last. I feel like the structure of these three games would be a great outline for an action movie.

@CB-lh4ph 3 ай бұрын

Hedonic treadmill is an example of a drawback made almost impossible by the need to actually capture your opponents king. If you checkmate the opponent and they take the checkmating piece with their king, you cant take back. You can essentially only capture their king with yours, which is stupid. They should at least count the king as 3.5 for that drawback

@dartadeqso 3 ай бұрын

08:19 easy drawback in the last game??

@a.lollipop 3 ай бұрын

It's easy if you don't reveal

@dartadeqso 3 ай бұрын

@@a.lollipop yes, yes... I know that. What I am wondering is why does he get an easy drawback at 2000+ ELO

@Miky691 3 ай бұрын

@@dartadeqso because the opponent is very close to him in elo probably

@a.lollipop 3 ай бұрын

@@dartadeqso ah, well i dont think the difficulty of the drawbacks is affected by elo, it seems to be very random

@dartadeqso 3 ай бұрын

@@a.lollipop 00:20

@cathsaigh2197 3 ай бұрын

8:23 even without the king being more valuable you could win by protecting with the bishop.

@pncka 2 ай бұрын

The first guy was just playing atomic chess.

@ThenomalnoobGaming 3 ай бұрын

7:45 "lesser" lol

@djartur25 3 ай бұрын

You are very lucky that you haven't lost this speedrun yet

@tochoXK3 3 ай бұрын

First opponent seemed to not abuse your Drawback

@tochoXK3 3 ай бұрын

That third game was brilliant

@dmplague 3 ай бұрын

That last game was very powerful

@tkg49official 3 ай бұрын

That third game made me say „oh my god.“

@moderndayvampire1469 3 ай бұрын

The dev really should nerf that last drawback.

@EustachyTV 3 ай бұрын

imagine if the first guy castled right into your queen

@TheSmartboy64 3 ай бұрын

That first game you had can be summed up in one word. Ooooffff

@giedriusmalikenas320 3 ай бұрын

You must move, king

@illialidur8244 3 ай бұрын

Every “Good Noon, Everyone”, I have to double take

@San-lh8us 3 ай бұрын

1:43 is the king more valuable than the queen?!

@carquest3748 3 ай бұрын

Yes

@ecMathGeek 3 ай бұрын

lol Damn. That last sequence was so brutal.

@angelmihaylov6888 3 ай бұрын

You had the same 100 rated challenge as the first drawback 4-5 days ago

@IslanKleinknecht 3 ай бұрын

Shameless. Brutal. Moisturized.

@BeaglzRok1 3 ай бұрын

I feel like Simp just did Hedonic Treadmill as a viewer challenge just a few days ago, I hope the discord isn't stealing ideas from Drawback Chess.

@Modie 3 ай бұрын

I mean, I saw that the first game was already lost, because Qf1+ was also winning, but moving the king is even more of a chad move (even if it is accidental) and it's more safe since the drawback might have made him lose if Simp decided to take that pawn after the queen move.

@NickShelden 3 ай бұрын

First game blinded checkmate by back rank with queen just prior to the king moves

@lonelyPorterCH 3 ай бұрын

The first drawback was the same as a recent video, nice^^ Except that the king has more material value as a queen somehow

@arifezwan8893 3 ай бұрын

I think you could deal with the second drawback by keeping a closed position. Trade your bishops out. But you won anyway, so I guess everything worked out in the end

@sirspook4374 3 ай бұрын

I mean, didnt you blunder your king at #2:40 ? All your opponent has to do is move queen to the a file. Sure, you can do a queen desperado, but king move forces king move

@JackVermicelli 3 ай бұрын

1:39 the King's not worth 3.5?

@fromandtounknown6575 3 ай бұрын

So the first opponents drawback was basically an instant death to using the Queen as an ICBM on the pawn in front of the king?

@jonteSUPERcodMASTER 3 ай бұрын

2:39 isn't Qf1 mate here?

@rzim0dnar 3 ай бұрын

It is, but we didn't know that until after the game ended. Normally that would just be giving away the queen. Which would still have forced Simp to move his King, breaking up any other Botez gambit situation.

@jonteSUPERcodMASTER 3 ай бұрын

@@rzim0dnar why couldn't you know till after the game?

@Itz_Sophia19 3 ай бұрын

math is mathing

@notsauer 3 ай бұрын

I understand revealing the drawback at the beginning against noobs, but at what elo will this stop?

@pickaxe4248 3 ай бұрын

I feel like its dumb to reveal the drawback lol

@andrewyesin4765 3 ай бұрын

First one was 😮

@sashagornostay2188 3 ай бұрын

Day 3 of asking Chess Simp not to start a "Xiangqi Simp" channel

@kitebrethren 3 ай бұрын

Are you secretly Magnus Carlsen?

@Aynshtaynn 3 ай бұрын

Man that last game was unfair for your opponent. And it shows "easy". Sure buddy

@BigDBrian 3 ай бұрын

The difficulty rating is not based on the drawback being revealed. You can play a pretty much normal game of chess with that restriction, so it's not very hard if the opponent doesn't know about it.

@Drakojana 3 ай бұрын

Simp said it numerous times - you should never reveal the drawback to your opponent, because it makes even the easiest drawbacks almost impossible.

@3141minecraft 3 ай бұрын

@@Drakojana then why is he revealing his drawback every game?

@PoppySquidJr 3 ай бұрын

@@3141minecraftTestosterone

@Drakojana 3 ай бұрын

@@3141minecraft You must be new to the channel

@leonhard6327 3 ай бұрын

2:38 I like how you don't mention that you threw the game with that move because a queen move to the back rank would win for black edit: oh... or this way I guess..

@sorin_markov 3 ай бұрын

LOL! Neither drawback at the end is an easy one, esp not if you both reveal

@dragomaster2422 3 ай бұрын

You mean good morning!

@HeyBous13 3 ай бұрын

Complaint about testosterone

@C-Farsene_5 3 ай бұрын

“porn move”

@firstlast8085 3 ай бұрын

2/3 = 100% Win Rate

@psycho3144 3 ай бұрын

you should also lose elo if lose a game

@valeckseimu3132 3 ай бұрын

This value sistem Need a patch

@theguardianwolf7800 3 ай бұрын

Simp: Absolutely crushed the first drawback in a video 5 days ago. Also Simp when he gets the same challenge: "Absolutely Impossible" Edit: Also, that last game was fucking smooth.

@maxastro 3 ай бұрын

That's what a difference revealing the drawback makes. XD

@lmabacus404 3 ай бұрын

@@maxastro Nah, it's the difference between playing 100 elo and playing non 100 elo. I bet he can reveal that challenge is to his 100-elo opponents and it wouldn't make a difference; they probably wouldn't understand what the drawback even means.

@alexandrunastasia 3 ай бұрын

Imagine losing to a lucky noob, lol!

@Mati-zc2ym 3 ай бұрын

First game, this drawback was in 100 elo chess series recently. Really viewer, not so original...

@medexamtoolscom Ай бұрын

No, your opponent outsmarted you in the first game. He didn't move his king to get it away from his pawn out of fear of his own drawback, as if you knew what it was. You didn't know his drawback. Why would he ever expect you to take that pawn with your queen, you not knowing that would have ended the game in your favor, you not knowing his drawback was atomic bomb? That would be the worst move ever on your part, throwing away your queen, he's not going to be afraid of you making the worst possible move out of random hope that his drawback would save you. You're just trying to find an excuse for believing everyone else is stupid because of your arrogance. He defeated you in a humiliating way because you were arrogant enough to reveal your drawback. That was his real motivation. Simple as that. He could have defeated you in a number of ways. He could have moved his king earlier. But he wanted to set it up so that you had to move your king into check.