Honestly third game was worse for me, that poor random was a good sport and we get to watch Simp use that sportsmanship to devour his elo like a starving shark lol
@HiddenBush643 ай бұрын
The game is the game
@shanetalon37293 ай бұрын
Simp blundering mate in one on first game at 3:14 to bishop to b5 and Simp is forced to capture the pawn. Good thing opp timed out.
@tianyuema47973 ай бұрын
Dang, I didn't even see that. That drawback is too vicious.
@gloweye3 ай бұрын
And here I thought I was smart seeing the queen blunder before Simp did.
@benjaminpedersen95483 ай бұрын
In his normal videos, it wouldn't be, since he would not be able to make the capture when checked, however, you are absolutely correct here, though it is easy to forget.
@antonliakhovitch83063 ай бұрын
I saw it too! I never see these things
@OnDragi2 ай бұрын
White's a3 at 2:32 would have been a nice win for him too-Bxa3 is forced, white takes the queen, then Bxb2 is forced, white takes the king.
@Majima_Nowhere3 ай бұрын
"You play normally but with no queen" vs "you cannot capture anything ever unless your opponent develops knights." Sounds faaaaaaiiiiir.
@amongsus93223 ай бұрын
It probably would be fair, if both players decide to not reveal their drawback. Then the opponent would just unsuspectingly develop all their pieces, giving you counterplay. But simp just had to reveal it.
@theominouspigeon3 ай бұрын
the voice when he says "wakka wakka" 💀
@MoonGlow223 ай бұрын
At third game, opponents drawback was way harder when revealed Respect for him to reveal it back to simp
@yuujin81943 ай бұрын
Honestly, I don't think so. If his opponent actually played around simp's square restriction at all, or realized that the queen can basically solo scholar's mate and defended that, then he could've drawn the game out to his advantage fairly quickly. Sure, with simp knowing the drawback, defending the king gets harder, but kings usually don't have to move much until endgame aside from castling, meanwhile simp would've had to constantly watch which of his pieces were under threat at any time because they basically become undefended every other turn.
@yuujin81943 ай бұрын
Hell, even defending from simp's attacks is actually a lot easier since, aside from knights, the opponent could literally block attacks with undefended pieces simply by placing them on simp's restricted color for the turn.
@yuujin81943 ай бұрын
Still, it was fortunate for simp that his opponent had a drawback that restricted king movement though, since the enemy king could literally become invincible if it simply alternated tile color according to simps restriction.
@AlmightyJu23 ай бұрын
I can't believe how bad that first opponent was, I can only assume he didn't notice simps drawback, I would have made him maidenless right from the start
@RoundShades3 ай бұрын
I would have went for the king. Make a pawn chain, then dunk Queen onto King whilst a pawn is still discovered. Yeah, take that pawn while I commit mass regicide.
@himothaniel3 ай бұрын
I sometimes wonder if revealing the drawback gives the opponent twice as much to think about and panics them into making mistakes.
@williamwright48133 ай бұрын
I loved the sarcasm in the text-to-speech saying "very funny" to the Pac-Man reference!
@JohnofPA3 ай бұрын
Those first two drawbacks were brutal
@Milesprowerthegamer3 ай бұрын
Never before have I seen Simp blunder his Queen for so many moves in a row, that first game was wild
@IsleyNumber13 ай бұрын
Stressing at simp blundering his queen constantly to white h4 in the first game
@gas1323 ай бұрын
"winning is forced" is certainly one of the phrases of all time
@idonnow23 ай бұрын
Petition for a series of drawback chess without revealing the challenge
@forcecaptainoverlordsuprem29643 ай бұрын
Nah that'd be lame
@jefez753 ай бұрын
that second opponent's drawback is an antithesis to simp's
@danielwanger59193 ай бұрын
He said it, it's obvious, useless comment
@DrZaius31413 ай бұрын
Except that it also means his queen is useless. But as usualy, simp has no actual clue and plays drawback chess as if he's the only one with a drawback.
@jefez753 ай бұрын
@@danielwanger5919 i typed mine before he said it himself😅 chill my guy
@jefez753 ай бұрын
@@DrZaius3141 true, his drawback literally f'ed him up
@AlcyonEldara3 ай бұрын
@@DrZaius3141 an useless queen vs immortal pieces. Revealing makes it difficult.. Just look at this game, all his opponent had to do was to keep the knights on their home squares and unleash a bishop and a rook.
@person80643 ай бұрын
First game both players missed the h4 push, winning Simp's queen
@Dape173 ай бұрын
Was thinking the same. Simp managed to blunder his queen on his first move. 😂
@drdilyor3 ай бұрын
it was mentioned at 2:20
@RowanxGhost3 ай бұрын
came here to say this
@redramone64883 ай бұрын
With a better opponent, Simp could have been absolutely humiliated. After his first knight move to c6, it was already checkmate. Opponent pushes the E pawn to e5 into forced pawn take by knight into queen taking knight + check into either bishop or queen forced block on e7, and all the opponent has to do is play pawn to a3, forcing the bishop/queen to take it, winning white a free king.
@Moshinoki3 ай бұрын
If only he'd mention it
@rogierownage3 ай бұрын
You actually got kinda lucky with the opponent's drawback in the second game. It stopped him from abusing his invulnerable queen to wreck your backline/king
@RoundShades3 ай бұрын
Really needs to consider only revealing the drawback 3 turns in, some of these drawbacks are relentless if revealed at start
@Psycho2507853 ай бұрын
“Now he’s gonna fork me”. Yeah, he forked you all right. :D
@m4ni0u3 ай бұрын
That first opponent was so bad it was painful to watch...
@Nutty313133 ай бұрын
In the second game, there was actually a slight benefit for Simp from the opponent's drawvback. Normally, his queen would be invulnerable and could just wreck havoc on his pieces with impunity until he had captured a rook. In this game, his queen couldn't exploit its invulnerability as much due to being restricted to king movement. Not that it made any difference to the outcome, as bishops and rooks are enough to annihilate the position if they can't be taken.
@theuseraccountname3 ай бұрын
Last game, they had Qd7, forcing your queen to move backwards onto a dark square, allowing them to untangle.
@TheL1meSt1ck-463 ай бұрын
Simp resigned. What a miracle.
@Jello_Criminal3 ай бұрын
2nd game, his queen could have came in and literally 3 move check mated you as you could not capture it, it could have just crashed into your pawn line and won. So when you said your drawback was completely countered by his you were wrong, his drawback is the only thing that stopped a 3 move checkmate.
@yuujin81943 ай бұрын
I think what he actually meant was that the opponent's drawback was completely countered by simp's. He said it wrong, but even though the opponent's drawback was basically "replace your strongest piece with another lose condition" simp's made both the king and the queen invincible so it didn't actually matter. There was no way for simp to use his opponent's drawback to his advantage. Sure, the opponent would've had an even easier time destroying simp with his queen, but with simp's drawback that would've just been overkill.
@theneoreformationist3 ай бұрын
8:00 opponent be like "Queen to F7 would be very unfortunate, but nobody plays like that... right?"
@andrewdarby88433 ай бұрын
There was an out for the player in the last game. Move the Queen to a safe space such as d6. Then, simp can't take the king due to his drawback and the king can escape to d8 next turn. The situation still looks bad, but knowing Simp's drawback, maybe they could have played out of it.
@yuujin81943 ай бұрын
knowing simp's drawback, they shouldn't have even let it get that far. it would've been fairly simple to block the queen's approach if the opponent had thought to take advantage of simp's drawback at all.
@tiresais3 ай бұрын
I'm surprised the queen check didn't end the game for you - you still CAN take the pawn in this format when in check, but you lost lose.
@GTron133 ай бұрын
There’s no pawn available for capture in that position. Rxd8 was a legal move.
@3141minecraft3 ай бұрын
If you didn't reveal your drawback on this video, you could had 300% winrate
@bboyJayTe3 ай бұрын
That second game was such a throw
@bajinglez3 ай бұрын
why did I immediately read the thumbnail in anya's voice 💀
@EuMarc3 ай бұрын
Waka waka, say nevermore
@well...59433 ай бұрын
bro got the common species and then the rare: "excited indigo bear", and then "energetic indigo bear"
@cupsdareal96323 ай бұрын
Gigachad opponents.
@gianlucatartaro13353 ай бұрын
That last guy was ridiculous bad wtf 😂
@kragast3 ай бұрын
in the first game 2. h4 by opponent would be destroying
@Penguin4096-si9fz3 ай бұрын
yo Pacman is my favorite drawback WAKKA WAKKA (but when you reveal your drawback)... your "wakka wakka" is mad cursed for Pacman, the hippo is ideal. that 2nd one... oof. the 3rd one was free.
@firockfinion33263 ай бұрын
So with that math, if he does one of these videos, loses two games and wins one, then it's a 100% lose rate?
@chri-k3 ай бұрын
no, it's a failure, so the series ends
@tozzasque3 ай бұрын
This channel is so underrated
@totorizzz3 ай бұрын
8:19 , that one bishop in the moon:
@Wildflwers3 ай бұрын
The 2nd opponent could’ve really just moved their knight and simp wouldn’t have been able to do anything 😭
@Nape4203 ай бұрын
In the first game you blundered the queen on the first move. He could have went h4 and you would have to capture the pawn with the queen
@kragast3 ай бұрын
In the third game your opponent could easily win by moving his knight to the color you can't move to and by only moving this knight
@tamtam58763 ай бұрын
Bro blundered his queen on move 1
@yuvalne3 ай бұрын
their drawback rating is broken. even without revealing to the opponent, the second drawback can't have been easier than the third.
@intronizator77133 ай бұрын
Last game was fun. If only any less punishing drowback for enemy than he could literaly run down entire board with just a king alternating white and black squares making him unkillable :) [no diagonal moves]
@zagorakis7583 ай бұрын
At the end of game 1, isn't bishop B5 winning for white ?
@GTron133 ай бұрын
Oh dang it is. Simp hung mate in 2.
@tochoXK33 ай бұрын
Maybe th first opponent deliberatl ignored the revealed drawback
@dumbledorelives933 ай бұрын
At 6:25, could Simp have played Bishop takes F7 check, then king cant take back due to Queen guarding, so is forced to move King to F8, after which he could have taken the knight, leveling up?
@user-zj9rr6yc4u3 ай бұрын
You can move your king into check in drawback check.
@crawfy483 ай бұрын
7:31 imagine this: black captures d4, if white does not move to d3, black can safely move there next turn, and then to d2 if it's not blocked
@Chiberia3 ай бұрын
3:30 - opponent could have played into Simp's drawback at the end, if he cleared the fork. push c3, let the knight in (thinking it's a free shot at the rook), then push a3 - the knight is forced to take a3, which can let the rook out.
@TimPaler3 ай бұрын
I wanted to see how the second opponent bongclouds simp to death, boooo(
@valeckseimu31323 ай бұрын
Thumbnail remind me of Shakira...add a 3rd Wakka pls😂
@San-lh8us3 ай бұрын
shakira didn't sing 3 wakka's, "tsamina mina eh eh, *wakka wakka* eh eh", only 2 wakkas
@manstick643 ай бұрын
waiting for the day simps drawback is death wish and he forces himself to reveal drawback to opponent
@pyromancerforhire3 ай бұрын
What is that drawback?
@manstick643 ай бұрын
if you can move into check, you must
@pyromancerforhire3 ай бұрын
@@manstick64 Damn
@RGC_animation3 ай бұрын
The opponent could've played a3 at any time, so that the bishop would be forced to capture it, and since there is another pawn on b2, Shrimp is forced to waste another move, so the opponent can just bring his queen right next to the king and capture it.
@artemiskearney80193 ай бұрын
Since your winrate is always a multiple of 100%, you could just say "1 winrate" or "3 winrate"
@cathsaigh21973 ай бұрын
5:20 I don't think his plan was that specific. He just knew that the bishops would be unkillable if he holds his knights back so he brought them out as fast as possible.
@Mati-zc2ym3 ай бұрын
3:33 Bb5 is literally checkmate lmao
@TheAstronomer1003 ай бұрын
You should play King of the Bridge
@HenrikMyrhaug3 ай бұрын
Love how your first 6 moves all blundered your queen, and your last move blundered a knight, and still you won the first game SMH...0
@LouisPlaysDrums3 ай бұрын
A fun idea at 2:36 for white would have been b4. If pawn takes b4, Qd8 wins the game as rook is forced to take on a2. If you take the pawn with the knight, Qd8 still wins, as knight is forced to either A2 or C2. I can't think of a way to stop it, but I'm only 700 rated lmao. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
@redramone64883 ай бұрын
With a better opponent, Simp could have been absolutely humiliated in that first game. After his first knight move to c6, it was already checkmate. Opponent pushes the E pawn to e5 into forced pawn take by knight into queen taking knight + check into either bishop or queen forced block on e7, and all the opponent has to do is play pawn to a3, forcing the bishop/queen to take it, winning white a free king.
@panda42473 ай бұрын
The last opponent could have played Qd7 instead of moving their knight. Then you have to move to a dark square and then they can capture your queen, so you'd have to move Qf4 (the only dark square retreat with the Q)
@ShennaTheShinyEevee3 ай бұрын
on the first game, was bishop b5 an instant win for white as you are forced to Nxc2?
@a-be8nf3 ай бұрын
Wakka wakka
@joz5343 ай бұрын
2 win - 1 loss 200% -100% = 100% winrate.
@AlexMetamorphCamel3 ай бұрын
Shinmon benimaru
@JackVermicelli3 ай бұрын
At 6:10, why not Queen to G7, to take the Knight, to allow taking the Bishop?
@joshuahudson21703 ай бұрын
I want to know why the game plan wasn't pawn storm.
@004alexlalhmangaihzuala33 ай бұрын
Can you show ur oponents drawback at the begining for a short time with spoilers alert so its more funy for some of us
@jefferyanderson82363 ай бұрын
Bro game 1 u blundered your queen move 1 and he didn’t see it and you didn’t see it then it remained blundered until move 7
@RaceBandit3 ай бұрын
Why did they consider a Bishop to be stronger than a Knight?
@rezabela244343 ай бұрын
really don't like the idea of reveal the drawback to opponent
@smickothesmickest3 ай бұрын
But the testosterone of doing it and winning makes it all worth it, plus it's optional so if you're a coward you can choose not to anyway
@bobosaurus3313 ай бұрын
Seems like you’re a coward then
@Deathranger9993 ай бұрын
@@smickothesmickestI’d prefer if he didn’t do it. I feel the games would be a lot more interesting as a result. The second one just wasn’t fun to watch, but could’ve been if he didn’t reveal it. At the very least I think it would be a lot better to conditionally reveal the drawback based on how hard it is. The whole testosterone coward thing is a cute gimmick but I do think it actually makes the videos a bit worse.
@JustSomeGuyWithAMug3 ай бұрын
Really like the idea of reveal the drawback to opponent
@Alresu3 ай бұрын
@@Deathranger999 I mean, for that we have all the regular vids in which he does not reveal the challenge to the opponent. Or that there even is one.
@oicmorez41293 ай бұрын
3:20 you blundered a checkmate in 1 (Bb5, pawn capture is forced, BxKing)
@amazingfireboy18483 ай бұрын
Math ain't mathing
@3snoW_3 ай бұрын
Only simp is forced to capture pawns, not the opponent...
@oicmorez41293 ай бұрын
@@3snoW_ You made me realize I wrote Bb4 instead of Bb5
@3snoW_3 ай бұрын
@@oicmorez4129 oooh i see what you meant. Well spotted
@amazingfireboy18483 ай бұрын
@@oicmorez4129 You were correct the first time, but I still don't see the pawn you'd need to capture.
@kroeterichNo13 ай бұрын
No Kings were taken en passant in this video 😥
@washington_pc33063 ай бұрын
lol I love the 100% win rate math. It’s totally correct. I trust him because hes asian
@aurora8orialis3 ай бұрын
Good morning
@NoomStuff3 ай бұрын
Video 204 of asking simp to play fps chess
@dapperman32013 ай бұрын
0:53
@thomasfinch62923 ай бұрын
Really wish you wouldn’t reveal the drawback. Yes I get it, Testosterone move and whatever, but it kind of ruins the fun.
@madisonking80573 ай бұрын
Why is he so intent on revealing his drawback?
@snomcultist1893 ай бұрын
Eh eh
@CloudyWarth3 ай бұрын
No chance he hits 1500
@almicc3 ай бұрын
You're nuts for revealing your drawback on the second game, do you always reveal or would you decide not to if it's just that bad?
@makotohanazawa65603 ай бұрын
this asian really said good evening when i just woke up from a nap in the afternoon 😅
@rishabhaagarwal-cv5rd3 ай бұрын
23 minutes
@AmaiSimply-go3ob3 ай бұрын
If in the second game the queen was a king, does it mean that it’s a chess gay couple?
@squarerootofjess3 ай бұрын
day 3 of begging simp not to reveal drawbacks
@YourPalQWERTY3 ай бұрын
Good evening? The video is uploaded first thing in the morning here in the States.