Chhewang Lama complains senior coaches for not letting him speak? Funny side of The Voice Kids

[@RatnaKumariMangerManger]

छेवाङ लामा कोच मा हुनैपर्छ ❤❤

[@kamalmagar3730]

Chhawang Lama best Singer ❤❤

[@jdentertainment4866]

Pramod sir Lai yeha Ali badhi nai naramro dekhaunw khojeko jasto lagyo pramod sir Kati cool and calm hununx vanne Kura sabailai thax very discipline person ❤❤

[@phurpulama100]

Ramro kura bhaniraxa dhekhinas

[@NaumaBudhamagar]

Ho ni bolna ta paunu paryo ni haina❤ chhiwang lama sirni

[@kamanamagar1901]

Dieheart fan chhewang lama ❤

[@pasang3743]

Nice bro love you 💝

[@pujapradhan5869]

Srishant ❤

[@buddhipakhrin-mw1uh]

my favourite chhewang sir❤🎉

[@tankagurung1311]

Yes he is gay no doubt

[@pratikking2272]

Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.

[@PrakashPradhan-e8l]

Melina mam is winner❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉😮😊😊😊😊😊😊🎉🎉

[@rohantamang3718]

My favorite jyojyo

[@Bik_Ram_3]

❤❤

[@royalramechhap7639]

Voicema pramod ra rai is king ko po khatra hunxa 2 janako

[@ramghartimagar]

❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@R.T.M-44]

❤

[@SundayRai-fi8my]

❤❤❤🎉🎉

[@gobinlimbu8338]

aru haina milan newar ko para chai pattakai man parena..kasailai bolnai didaina..

[@pratikking2272]

Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.

[@videogameing5755]

Derai sojo vayera ho

[@exosfangirl497]

all coaches cut eachother while commenting. turn by turn garda vaihalyoni kina hata jaile

[@pasang3743]

Behind photo ❤

[@samjanarai9471]

Battle Round ko ni Shout vaisakyo k hw

[@ibrai27]

🙏🙏🙏

[@kabintamang4252]

Biswa sir condovorce chalaune vo yespale

[@kamanamagar1822]

Raju lama ko xora ho ki xewang ?😂😂😂

[@pasang3743]

I lisan smal bro song today 😅

[@sonamtamang728]

Discipline mai basne ho bhane palai palo bhannu parchha. Tara yaha tachhad machhad nai chalchha Nepal praya thauma

[@rabinsuryabanshi5545]

Dnt try to make controvacy putting clip of whole interview for your benefit

[@NAGAMERTEAM45]

Ho vanako

[@Surajghartimagar143]

ᴄʜʜᴇᴡᴀɴɢ ᴊɪ ʟᴇᴢᴇɴᴅ ʜᴏ ᴋ

[@pasang3743]

King