Chhewang Lama complains senior coaches for not letting him speak? Funny side of The Voice Kids

For Business Inquiry: [e-mail] Mobile number: 9843456125
Follow Biswa Limbu on:
▶Instagram: / biswa.limbu
▶Facebook: / biswasamekham
▶Like Biswa Limbu's page here: Biswa-Limbu-...
▶ This channel is dedicated to you all. I will upload vlogs,interviews,short films and interesting videos.I am really blessed with your support and love for Mero Online TV. I have started this channel to entertain you in different way. I would love to listen you all. I really appreciate critical comments. Hope you guys support,love and give guidance to me. It’s been almost 15 years in media and I always got love and support through this journey. Audiences are god for me.Love you all.
Chhewang Lama complains senior coaches for not letting him speak? Funny side of Voice Kids

[@jdentertainment4866]

Pramod sir Lai yeha Ali badhi nai naramro dekhaunw khojeko jasto lagyo pramod sir Kati cool and calm hununx vanne Kura sabailai thax very discipline person ❤❤

[@kamalmagar3730]

Chhawang Lama best Singer ❤❤

[@NaumaBudhamagar]

Ho ni bolna ta paunu paryo ni haina❤ chhiwang lama sirni

[@kamanamagar1901]

Dieheart fan chhewang lama ❤

[@pasang3743]

Nice bro love you 💝

[@gobinlimbu8338]

aru haina milan newar ko para chai pattakai man parena..kasailai bolnai didaina..

[@pratikking2272]

Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.

[@SundayRai-fi8my]

❤❤❤🎉🎉

[@MYCULTURELIMBU2840]

❤❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏

[@ramghartimagar]

❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@ibrai27]

🙏🙏🙏

[@videogameing5755]

Derai sojo vayera ho

[@royalramechhap7639]

Voicema pramod ra rai is king ko po khatra hunxa 2 janako

[@pasang3743]

Behind photo ❤

[@44rajuthapamagar]

❤

[@pasang3743]

I lisan smal bro song today 😅

[@Bik_Ram_3]

❤❤

[@buddhipakhrin-mw1uh]

my favourite chhewang sir❤🎉

[@tankagurung1311]

Yes he is gay no doubt

[@pratikking2272]

Why the Indigenous Status of Limbus Should Be RevokedThe question of indigenous status in Nepal is a contentious issue shaped by historical, cultural, and political factors. The Limbus, a community claiming indigenous status, lack substantial historical and archaeological evidence to support this designation. This essay argues that the indigenous status of Limbus should be reconsidered due to their migratory history from Sichuan to Tibet and later to Nepal, lack of historical artifacts, and manipulation of documents with colonial assistance.Historical and Archaeological VoidUnlike other indigenous groups in Nepal, such as the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Newar, who possess rich historical records, architectural landmarks, and cultural artifacts dating back centuries, the Limbus lack tangible evidence of ancient settlements, palaces, temples, or significant archaeological finds that would substantiate their claim as indigenous to the region. The absence of such evidence raises doubts about their historical ties to the land compared to other established indigenous communities.Migration PatternsHistorical records indicate that the Limbus migrated from Sichuan, China, to Tibet in the 13th century, and subsequently moved to Nepal in the late 16th century. These migrations, marked by geopolitical shifts and cultural exchanges, highlight their origins outside the current borders of Nepal. Unlike indigenous groups with deep-rooted ancestral ties to the region, the Limbus' migratory history suggests a more recent arrival, challenging their claim to indigenous status based on continuous presence and cultural continuity.Colonial Influence and Fabrication of DocumentsDuring the colonial era, particularly under British rule, the Limbus reportedly fabricated documents to bolster their indigenous claims. This manipulation, facilitated by colonial authorities, enabled them to assert a historical narrative and gain recognition as indigenous in certain administrative contexts. Such historical revisionism and document forgery undermine the integrity of their indigenous status claim, especially when compared to the rigorous criteria and historical authenticity required for indigenous recognition in other regions.Contemporary Status in SikkimIn neighboring Sikkim, the Limbus have lost their tribal status, indicating a recognition shift that reflects deeper scrutiny of their indigenous claims. This precedent underscores the inconsistencies and challenges associated with defining indigenous identity solely based on self-proclaimed historical narratives and manipulated documentation.

[@kabintamang4252]

Biswa sir condovorce chalaune vo yespale

[@rohantamang3718]

My favorite jyojyo

[@sonamtamang728]

Discipline mai basne ho bhane palai palo bhannu parchha. Tara yaha tachhad machhad nai chalchha Nepal praya thauma

[@rabinsuryabanshi5545]

Dnt try to make controvacy putting clip of whole interview for your benefit

[@NAGAMERTEAM45]

Ho vanako

[@kamanamagar1822]

Raju lama ko xora ho ki xewang ?😂😂😂

[@pasang3743]

King