Рет қаралды 395
Some people think that old-style honkyoku players (think Tanikita Muchiku, Kobayashi Shizan, or even my own teacher Takahashi Suiko) are "out of tune" or "can't play tsu meri." It's true that chi and tsu (along with many other aspects of our playing) don't sound like they do in modern shakuhachi playing, but this is not because we're out of tune. In this video, I go into detail as to how and why our playing is different, exploring factors like
- the scale we use
- location in place and time
- the specific shakuhachi being played
- the player
- music theory, feelings, and other stuff.
We also discuss what my grand-teacher Toya Deiko writes on the subject in his book Komuso Shakuhachi Shinan:
“In Shakuhachi no Hi-gi published in 1921 by Kobayashi Shizan (student of Higuchi Taizan), he says ‘Chi, u, and tsu, concerning their meri tones - in many cases, when these are to be played meri, there is no meri symbol attached to them, so you just need to know that they are all meri.’ However, he also says ‘since chi, u, and tsu, in many cases must always be played meri, you put your finger along the flute so that it rests just above the hole, rather than covering half of it.’ If we trust this just as it is written, then chi should usually be fusho (Ab) - but old flutes are made so that chi, when played as-is, is too high, so if you shade it a little we could understand this to mean that it’s Oshiki (A) - so the meaning is unclear… The first hole on Kyu-han wari shakuhachi is low, so it’s easy to produce tsu chu-meri and meri. However, for shakuhachi players used to playing yosen [inakabushi] honkyoku, tsu meri [meaning tsu dai meri, Eb on a modern 1.8] isn’t used very much, and being unaccustomed to it their meri doesn’t go all the way down; players who learned gaikyoku in Kinko-ryu and Tozan-ryu would say ‘those honkyoku players can’t play tsu meri.’”