Chip 'N Dale Rescue Rangers is References: The Movie

The Brand New Chip 'N Dale Rescue Rangers Movie just released, and I've been seeing a lot of people praise it, not only for the references but also for being a good movie in general, which left me wondering; Is Chip 'N Dale Rescue Rangers Good or Bad?
🙌 / lsmark_​​
😃 / lsmark​​
#Chip'NDale #RescueRangers #UglySonic
The Forgotten Fairly OddParents Crossover - • The Forgotten Fairly O...
Remember Game Grumps AWFUL KZbin Red Show - • Remember Game Grumps A...
Edited By - / _croey
Outro Music - / ls-mark-outro

[@LSMark]

What did you think of Chip 'N Dale Rescue Rangers if you've seen it 🤔

[@johnny_the_halfender]

Meh

[@newfoundbland]

Loved it

[@Pl-lineas]

🦞

[@Meme_Man_]

Loved it honestly

[@CloverDoesJunkStopMotion]

It was an alright film.

[@ComicalRealm]

"It’s good to know that this movie is taking a Who Framed Roger Rabbit and a Once Upon a Time in Hollywood approach. I was worried that this movie was going to be like the live-action Alvin and the Chipmunks movies. I also like the idea that 2D characters can have a surgery done to make them 3D, as it helps to set up the rules of this world. " - Winnie The Pooh

[@JimJom]

Hate to spread spoilers but looks like you've seen it so. Wouldn't it have been better if flounder got the surgery? What would've changed if he did, would they be able to erase his mouth.

[@scr0ngle108]

when did Winnie the Pooh say that

[@draculaura_keyblade]

@@JimJom what do you think they did to nemo? i mean,,, izzy's way home, finding jesus

[@orance2526]

thanks xi jinping

[@KeybladeMasterAndy]

@@scr0ngle108 I don't know. Maybe Jim Cummings said it recently?

[@BugsyFoga]

I would honestly say I t’s the kind of film I wish Space Jam a new legacy was with how it leans more with the self aware tone and its commentary on the animation industry, and I say that as someone who enjoyed a new legacy.

[@GreenBunny.]

Agreed

[@LuckyLeverVIEJO]

@no way back finally it isn't here

[@RedeIVT]

That already sort of existed: it was called Back in Action.

[@melaniedrobinson]

I thought that Movie was terrible. No offense.

[@BugsyFoga]

@@melaniedrobinson thats ok

[@ShockzNDrawe]

My friend described this movie as being "A risky idea played out in the safest possible way" and I honestly don't think I could think of a better description for it if I tried.

[@_Iscream]

Exactly. The whole movie felt off, like they were relying on formula. I never actually ended up liking any of the characters.

[@mihailos8701]

I agree, it does fits description

[@scottyb8392]

I’m actually glad you mentioned the Peter Pan actor. That really rubbed me the wrong way, as soon as I saw the trailer I was like… no WAY are they actually doing this. Bobby tried to stay clean after getting out of prison and became interested in art, but because he was already weak from drug use, he died of a suspected heart attack, alone, in an abandoned building, and wasn’t discovered to be dead until over a year later when his mother, having already lost her husband that year, was finally informed that her only child was buried in an unmarked grave on Hart Island, where they still are, because obviously they couldn’t find them at that point. But yeah I’m glad Disney thinks it’s funny when child actors have a negative self image because they were more valuable at the age of 11 and then are deemed disposable due to “acne”

[@sunnisideupplz3920]

Agreed! It was in really poor taste. Really wish they would have used another character or created their own.

[@justice8718]

Vampires simply hate us and our children.

[@scottyb8392]

@@justice8718 …yeah?

[@justice8718]

​@@scottyb8392 Do you what vampires are based on? It's the same group everyone hates, from ancient Japan to europe. Unforgivable child fuckers.

[@carlycrays2831]

I feel two things about this. Mostly, I do feel disgusted, especially since we see no redemption or chance for Peter Pan. It feels like the writers knew the story about Briscoll and thought it would be funny. However, I also think it was pretty ballsy for this to be included at all. It has been considered one of the darker things Walt Disney ever did, but for decades only big film and animation fans knew. Now it's out in the open and we can talk about it. However, I wish they had given Peter a happier ending.

[@MegaSoulHero]

Roger Rabbit is still the best example of how you do an IP crossover movie. It managed to do it flawlessly.

[@TheRealNTM]

In fact, this movie is basically a shittier version of Roger Rabbit. I got that from the first trailer.

[@DeadHandtheSurvivor]

@@TheRealNTM Not "shittier", like if you want that go watch Spacejam 2, at least this movie tries to poke fun at the animation industry like Roger Rabbit did. I would say it's a more modern but not as good version of Roger Rabbit.

[@bababooty928]

@@DeadHandtheSurvivor Nah its shittier

[@DeadHandtheSurvivor]

@@bababooty928 Shittier applies that it's bad quality in every way, and from what I have seen? Not really. Don't get me wrong, nothing will top Rogar Rabbit. But for what it is? I think it's a decent attempt at what could've been a great modern Roger Rabbit, but it could've been way better. It's more like a water downed version of Roger Rabbit. Not bad, but eh, you rather watch the OG movie.

[@iraford5788]

@@DeadHandtheSurvivor I agree with you.

[@StinkyBlueRat]

They really should’ve added a bear in the big blue house reference… maybe by adding a certain blue mouse?

[@SketchG]

Oh my God! It's the blue Doobus Goobus!

[@chiefspartan02]

RAT

[@piranhalettuce]

@@SketchG Boobus Goobus

[@katkat895]

Blue mouse? Sonic the hedgehog?

[@hypernova_119]

AYO IT'S CRISP RAT

[@falconizer642]

I wish they did something different with Peter Pan considering the story of his voice actor Bobby Driscoll, who was pretty much abandoned by Disney after he grew older and died penniless and a substance abuser. It just seems in poor taste making him the villain and having the same backstory.

[@callmepsycho3132]

Wait, what?

[@Bomp..]

@@callmepsycho3132 yeah the original actor died

[@carlycrays2831]

They even make a reference to why he was fired from Disney, which was for excessive acne. I just wish they had done more to either redeem Peter or play into his very tragic story.

[@dcscruz2970]

@@carlycrays2831 imagine in a old script have Mickey look like himself but with a weird grey beard (like dr house) with a cup of obviously chocolate in a whiskey glass and the duo talk on why he didn’t do anything for pete and have him deliver a speech: “Back then we only cared about what’s the next project. I never noticed how our constant line left so many behind without much to do. With Peter… he continues to be a mistake of my past. Everyday I pay for it. I make sure no one of my acts gets pushed aside. Show new art ever imagined! But the toll on having to check every single thing. As to not repeat the past. I grew from it. He didn’t. And I will never forgive myself. But that’s business for ya. It never stops. You know that don’t you buddy?” As he looks at dale.

[@carlycrays2831]

@@dcscruz2970 Not that this is a bad idea, but I think the greater issue here is that it's a moment for Disney to be given a chance of retrospective and growth, not a moment for Peter Pan. I think a better moment for Peter Pan would be him directing a play for the prison or in group therapy with other characters. You know, either finding that creative spark in a helpful way or him digging into his own pain.

[@therando1165]

The fact Disney has enough money to even use characters from franchises that aren't even owned by Disney is terrifying.

[@witchingbrew3]

Finally someone says this! It's spooky

[@CalzoneStudiozOfficial]

be thankful they didn't buy all of them

[@neonthunder3261]

@@CalzoneStudiozOfficial Yet.

[@valletas]

"The fact that nintendo has enough money to use characters they dont even own in smash is terrifying"

[@therando1165]

@@CalzoneStudiozOfficial it's like their teasing us that they could do it.

[@TheCommenterDragon]

One of the things i liked most about the new Chip 'n Dale film is the number of cameos that were made by both Disney and non-Disney characters, especially Roger Rabbit. and i kinda both understood why Peter Pan became the villain of the film and at the same time saw that he should've just moved on like all the other celebrities that were once famous and then eventually tossed out like trash.

[@AlguienTeLlamoBuho]

Peter Pan was always a villain tbh.

[@mandalorianhunter1]

Some people just don't want to move on

[@TheCommenterDragon]

@@AlguienTeLlamoBuho Yeah, when it comes to Pan and Hook there are two sides of that story, Peter is the villain because he cut off a guys hand for no reason and possibly stole kids from their homes IE the lost boys and Hook is a villain because he's a pirate and you know pirates are naturally bad guys.

[@icarue993]

Aside from IRL voice actor of PP, the young kid that played Anakin in SW1 was als bullied and sent to jail. Child actors tend to have a LOT of abuse by either their parents or the studio. There are some interesting stories about Zack and Cody, Sam and Gibby (from iCarly), and Miley Cyrus (each different on their own way and explain different things from the industry).

[@SlyDante]

I dunno, on the non-Disney side of things, the cameos included have so little to actually do that you can actually hear the Disney executive whining "...FINE" whenever they appear, having been told that they needed non-Disney characters for this film to work, so they just sprung for the bare minimum. It fact, it's kind of telling that the only significant non-Disney cameo, Ugly Sonic, is basically just a giant joke about how much one of their competitors f*cked up.

[@paulmerviel1617]

No matter how many times they try, there will never ever be another Who Framed Roger Rabbit. It's honestly a miracle that that movie not only works, but is also a masterpiece that can never be replicated imho.

[@jakoblent4694]

WFRR is a beautiful movie that honestly it makes sense why the concept is so hard to replicate back then there were not really all that many different animation styles so the team could focus a lot on the 2d animation also they went all out for like practical effects the piano duel being the biggest example

[@ching-jungyang62]

In the Roger Rabbit movie, you can believe live-action and cartoon characters are actually interacting with each other. The Chip N' Dale movie feels like interacting with photoshop pics.

[@jakoblent4694]

@@ching-jungyang62 yeah they feel like actually being there having personalitys and Being animated so well

[@paulmerviel1617]

@@jakoblent4694 I don't actually think it's mainly because of the animation styles, that should be irrelevant imo. If you watch the behind the scenes of WFRR, you'll understand just how much work was put into the live action sections so that the animators could draw over that. The piano duel scene in particular was the most elaborate, they built a whole stage for people to walk under and carry poles with plates on top, and the animators would then draw the penguins in place. These days, however, that amount of effort and especially passion is so rarely found.

[@paulmerviel1617]

@@jakoblent4694 But there are of course more reasons other than the animation and production effort. The writing is probably the most important reason, with the story having so many layers, comparedbto everything these days being comparatively shallow (not to mention the overall horniness of the film too lmao). Then there's also the acting, I've rarely seen modern actors put in as much soul into similar roles to Bob Hoskins' and Christopher Lloyd's. And then of course there's the background corporate aspect. I mean, this was the only time we ever saw Donald & Daffy AND Mickey & Bugs together in the same scenes. I don't care how many references Chip 'N Dale has, WFRR was revolutionary for that reason.

[@pitcherfanciullo1003]

Having ugly Sonic in the movie was actually pretty genius, if it weren’t for him a lot of people wouldn’t wanna see it

[@carlycrays2831]

Not just being in it, but him essentially saving the day. That part was shocking, but appreciated.

[@roxanne_]

This is true, I was one of them.

[@IcyDiamond]

I had basically 0 interest in this movie before I heard Ugly Sonic was in it

[@howboutno412]

@@IcyDiamond same.

[@StarMarine1084]

ugly Sonic was legit the reason I even watched it lmao

[@catrass7515]

About the Simpsons thing: if all the cartoon characters are actors for their shows, why can't a Simpson character appear before the show aired? Wouldn't that just mean they haven't been cast yet?

[@k_n_c_y]

Yea I was thinking the same thing

[@cyanity1017]

That actually makes sense, considering we see the characters like ugly sonic who was uncasted including ones that were never casted at all like most of the non-series characters, and we do see the toons can have their own children [ which adds a few more questions ] and we see really older style toons that are seen in the background of some shots despite that style not being around for years.

[@MCMIVC]

It's just like the penguins from Mary Poppins being in Roger Rabbit.

[@xaviermaxime1319]

I think they are drawn by some magical pen or something idk

[@AlexLopez-xb3yn]

This movie succeeded expectations but when I saw the movie this is definitely in the Roger Rabbit universe. This is what Space Jam a new legacy trying to be but failed. The cameos and comedy are smart and literally shocking. Definitely the best Disney + movie that they put on the streaming service. But Who Framed Roger Rabbit is a masterpiece and way better than this

[@elijaharroyo4846]

Agreed. This movie exceeded my expectations. Yes, I still rank Who Framed Roger Rabbit above this one

[@andreafraustoz]

do you think Gargoyals revival possible

[@thephony1651]

Right? It’s not “Hiya everybody, it’s me, Buggs Bunny from Looney Tunes!” It’s “Hi everyone, I’m the rabbit that played Buggs Bunny in Looney Tunes.”

[@carlycrays2831]

I think the cameos worked because we weren't expecting them. No one predicted Ugly Sonic or the Randy Marsh cameo or the references to Nick cartoons.

[@bradfork6853]

@cherry fairy that's your opinion. It's a dogshit, wrong, and worthless opinion but it's yours nonetheless.

[@SrLuigi64]

I'm genuily curious if Peter Pan's backstory in this movie was just a mere coincidence. I really want to give the writers the benefit of the doubt, but its difficult since it's so similar to what actually happened to him . Besides that aspect and some other things, I enjoyed watching it and I would recommend it as well.

[@carlycrays2831]

I think it's impossible that they didn't know.

[@eyeconqueror1185]

It’s the obvious joke to make about Peter Pan, so it’s not really intentional, but it’s clearly in very poor taste and is not a creative gag at all

[@FireroseNekowolf]

As I see it, even if the writers or whoever didn't now, Disney itself sure as hell should have, so even if the writers aren't the blame, the company is for allowing it.

[@katie2275]

It would have been interesting if it was a character who nobody remembers who was mad that everyone was getting bootlegged and rebooted but nobody cares about them - like the kid from Sword and the Stone or Oliver and Company or something. Like he turns around his chair and he’s like “remember me?!” And Chip and dale are like “ahhh… yeah… you were in… Ah..”

[@CheatsythePimp2]

It’s also possible that while the writers didn’t know, the executives either didn’t bother to check or the executives knew but didn’t care since they make so much money.

[@jewelsdragonfly]

Despite how coincidental how Sweet Pete, compared to his late VA. Pretty effed up. I think the one character that would fit the role: Oswald the Lucky Rabbit. Oswald the Lucky Rabbit would be the one to kidnap characters and bootleg them. After getting the worst treatment, being Mickey's shadow. Driving him depressed after a series of rejections, eventually leading him to create bootleg versions of Disney films.

[@koichidignitythief7429]

originally Pluto was supposed to be the real villain and Pete was just working for him.

[@perfectswag8116]

@@koichidignitythief7429 That's not true, that's based off of a 4chan "leak" which makes no sense - the claim is that Gadget gets kidnapped, yet the entire movie revolves around Montrey Jack getting kidnapped - unless the 4chan guy somehow got a copy of a very early script, it'd mean that Disney somehow reshot nearly all of the movie (and added a whole subplot about the stinky cheese and cologne smell) and dubbed over all the lines from February until May - which is 3 months. Nah, sorry but that never happened.

[@Klonoahedgehog]

Man that would have made a lot more sense.

[@DarkenedCloud95]

That's ironic too cuz Oswald was supposed to be face of the company too he was first cartoon character created by Walt Disney

[@CaptainLumpycake]

@@DarkenedCloud95 thats literally what they just said

[@TheDouglasBarbosaShow]

I like it a lot! Ugly Sonic, all the cameos, the Lonely Island type of humor, the uncanny valley, really love this movie!

[@InvestmentIdea]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/onaYhmWaZtibeK8 Finally it's here

[@mushroomanjcc1954]

Dude, I cant tell if this guy is trying to meme or not

[@thequinlanshow3326]

I hope this is sarcasm because this kind of comment is exactly what this videos about lmao

[@PeterGriffin11]

@@thequinlanshow3326 I have no strong opinion on this film yet but why does it need to be sarcasm? If this individual really likes the whole movie just because Ugly Sonic is in it then so what? People have different standards and not everyone is a critic that can write an extremely detailed paragraph explaining why they like or dislike something.

[@CartoDarko]

@@PeterGriffin11 i think it was more aimed at the "you completely fell for the marketing ploy"

[@tylerr2016]

imo Officer Putty is my favorite character just due to being Jk Simmons just being an asshole and it works. Also the fact he did random grunts and noises just makes him work so well. I also loved the fact they implemented sock puppets, muppets, and I think during the scene before they meet the chef has an insanely clean design for the wig shop owner, it actually felt like 2D. Personally I was indifferent to it but I had a good time watching it

[@carlycrays2831]

I was really surprised at the twist with him. And it worked, especially since we saw just how brutal getting into a fight with a ton like him would be.

[@thetimetraveler7297]

@@carlycrays2831 I liked it as well. I kind of hate this somewhat trope of somebody having information on something or wanting to help but at the end surprise surprise a twist they help or become the main villain. I was a bit nervous with the cop lady that helped Chip and Dale was gonna to be a bad guy but she didn’t and actually just wanted to help solve the case.

[@NobodyC13]

Probably because Officer Putty is like the unholy fusion of J. Jonah Jameson and the T-1000.

[@Doofus_Productions]

I just kinda felt mixed on the entire movie. Being someone who kinda grew up with classic shorts featuring the two and a bit of the original Rescue Rangers show I thought it was one of the more unique ways to bring the two back into mainstream, note unique doesn’t equate to being great. I did end up enjoying some elements of the film. Mostly just the mixed media which at least looked decent for the most part, but generally I thought the overall movie was just okay. My main takeaway was that it was very reference heavy which should have made it bad but it somehow didn’t, at least not to the extent I thought it would. I think when stuff is just in the background and not supposed to grab the audience’s attention it doesn’t feel too bad because it’s not like they’re trying to fill in the actual runtime of the movie with references versus when stuff is just name dropped in dialogue where it is really in your face about it.

[@ching-jungyang62]

I've only seen the trailer, so I have to ask: Are the hand-drawn characters really that stiff? I watched a lot of classic cartoons, and the characters are always full of life. The way they talk, move, sing, or even just the facial expression can deliver so much charm, I feel like they actually exist even though I knew they aren't real. Chip in the trailer just doesn't seem right to me. He looks like he is made of porcelain, and his movement isn't as bouncy and energetic in the cartoons. I don't know if it got improved in the movie, I do hope it did.

[@BratzFelineDevine]

@@ching-jungyang62 The 2d characters aren't actually hand drawn unfortunately. It's CGI with 2D shaders to make it look handdrawn.

[@ching-jungyang62]

@@BratzFelineDevine WHAT THE HECK! The trailer implied Dale ugraded himself while Chip remained "traditional", does that mean Chip also had that 3D surgery but not completely? Or the surgery failed so terrible that made him quit show biz?

[@darkage9962]

It may just be me, but it seems like the decision to make the original rescue rangers canonically a Hollywood tv series undermines the premise of the original. The character and villain interactions and the unique episode ideas, along with the creative problem-solving being tacked up to a screenplay felt like a bit of a cop-out imo.

[@MatecaCorp]

I was surprised at how enjoyable this movie is. Like, it’s not really anything incredible, but like LS Mark said, there are some genuinely clever moments and interesting ideas, and the writers clearly did give a [crap] about the movie. I especially liked the story about Paw Patrol dogs mauling the swat team, because that one particularly felt like the movie was laughing with the audience, and they did a good job making sure not to blow it up into some big “HEY, YOU KNOW THE PAW PATROL?” type moment. My main complaints were the animation and the dialogue. The animation wasn’t great, especially on the “2D” characters. They almost looked rotoscoped somehow. Also, the dialogue was really clunky in places, especially with the human characters. Not a “good” movie, but a fun one nonetheless.

[@Moesaurus]

2D characters were definitely rotoscoped! So glad someone else commented on it. I feel like it lacked care with shadows/ambiance interaction with them 😩

[@chloenieuwsma4846]

How could little puppies maul a professional team down though? I don't recall Chase or Marshall being that bloodthirsty

[@t700e]

@@chloenieuwsma4846 It’s called “acting” 😂

[@MatecaCorp]

@@chloenieuwsma4846 The villain in the movie is literally Peter Pan tho lol

[@chloenieuwsma4846]

@@MatecaCorp I know I was talking about that specific line

[@Man-wolf-]

Im glad im not the only one who noticed ugly sonic was ironically the best animated one, everyone feels lik their on slow motion or jus- wrong but yet sonic looked fine animation wise Also yeah the cell shading is BAD they tried so hard to look edgy like beastars but didnt get why it worked there

[@neonthunder3261]

It reminds me of Hot Wheels World Race, in a good way.

[@colekiesler6218]

Despite all of your nitpicks about the movie I can definitely see your opinion about it, sometimes either we can like or not like something we may as well leave it in the middle but hey it was definitely better than Space Jam 2.

[@bastian8271]

@don't be surprised Just stop. You and everyone you love have no power. It's done for you. Just leave.

[@andygoldwoods170]

@@bastian8271 What is that person linking? I'm kind of nervous to click on it...

[@mechajay3358]

The Ugly Sonic making a appearance was a surprise, but having Peter Pan story based off his VA's was really done in poor tatse.

[@ironmaster6496]

I strongly agreed, i mean the company who ruined the life of a guy is now using THAT to base their freaking villain

[@frankman3045]

@@ironmaster6496 the company has the same name sure but (correct me if im wrong) this movie would have been made by entirely different people than the people who made peter pan and the higher ups have all changed as well so it doesnt really seem fair to say that

[@torytellstales]

Thats the reason I can't watch this movie, the whole Peter Pan being an adult thing is strange and if they did base the villains backstory off of that then that is disrespectful, if you're going to make Peter Pan a villain, keep him a kid

[@ironmaster6496]

@@frankman3045 Doesn't change the fact at all though its pretty tasteless nonetheless, since as far as i know this is the first time company even awkowledge it

[@tayzk5929]

Why do you feel like it's poor taste? I feel like it's making people aware of a sad reality that still exists to a large degree today.

[@steakdriven]

The fact they had Gadget and zipper in a relationship, a procreative one no less, is kind of a disgusting deal-breaker.

[@misterzygarde6431]

I find it interesting how they got so many Viacom owned characters in particular like Squidward and Randy. Maybe that’s why they were allowed to use a certain redesign. Hell it’s pretty neat that it got two characters from Dreamworks as well

[@petergriffinsbrother2499]

Patrick star is also seen

[@SonicXtreme99akaCreeperMario]

To anyone who hasn’t seen the film, squidward’s star of fame is the cameo’s he’s talking about

[@SonicXtreme99akaCreeperMario]

@@petergriffinsbrother2499 not as an actual cameo but a bootleg with a fraggle head

[@Person-wz6iy]

I thought the Snake was Rattlesnake Jake from Rango.

[@ArtseyHayton06]

Randy as in Randy cunningham 9th grade ninja?

[@ImperfectXIII]

"the two characters could have been replaced with any cartoon duo from the 90s and nothing would be different" THIS. This, in my opinion, is the movie's biggest sin. It's just NOT Rescue Rangers. Ugly Sonic was incredibly funny though.

[@senorapples1115]

I think people hated the meta aspect then the refs aspects when it was first revealed. People don't like how uneedlessy "woah look how self aware we are WOAH!" Media has become. Refs aren't necessarily meta due to how well it can be in a movie.

[@huntercool2232]

For those who claim Peter Pan’s story being similar to Bobby Discroll’s is just an accident by Disney I just wanna point out that the chances of that being true is next to none. They literally could’ve chosen any character to play the villain. Not only could it have been any Disney character, but literally any of the characters from all the film companies they bought for this movie. And why make him the villain?! Like that’s just messed up.. And even if it was an accident (Which it’s most likely not) the story is just still just way to similar and just gives you a bad vibes even if it wasn’t intentional.

[@chocomin5059]

I finished watching it and I gotta say, I really liked it. I thought It was pretty cool seeing different animation styles used, the jokes were pretty well done. I was worried that this movie would be kind of a disaster like Space Jam 2, but I’m really happy I was wrong about that. It was a really fun movie and would make for a nice rewatch, and also makes me want to watch the Rescue Rangers tv show

[@spideyguy3315]

It basically what Space Jam 2 should have been like

[@chocomin5059]

@@spideyguy3315 Yes exactly

[@SkullZie]

Same, i really want to rewatch this because of some specific scenes, i just really like this movie now 😂

[@KingNexusMOCs]

I see his nitpicks as just that. I don't think Mark made a lot valid criticisms of this movie.

[@vanessarodriguez1798]

The whale rap song killed me 😭😂

[@abrahamlincoln1217]

Me and my friend watched this movie and loved it but not for the references. We loved it for how baffling the plot was and the weird concepts and scenes. Like that cheese drug lab or the fact that Knock off gumby detective hade his head actually shredded. It honestly might be my new favourite movie for how odd it was.

[@carlycrays2831]

I think this weirdness worked because it fit within the world's logic.

[@waywardlaser]

Unlike Space Jam 2 or Scoob a lot of the cameos were blink-and-you'll-miss-it moments rather than being so heavily focused on. The mystery was obvious but I thought the villain's plan was really wacky and creative, and ties in well with the whole reboot theme. Had the potential to be better, but I still enjoyed it.

[@huntercool2232]

Disney 50 years later: “Hey Bobby, just wanted to let you know that we’re gonna be using the story of when we kicked you to the curb for getting old as the backstory for the villain in one of our new movies, who is also the most well known character you’ve ever played. Is that alright?” Bobby Discroll: **Literally lying in his grave** Disney: “Awesome! Thanks Bobby!”

[@AttemptedVoices]

That was a lie, LS Mark. Every tweet was about: UGLY SONIC! And I actually agree, it was an okay movie.

[@SonicTheCutehog]

Ugly Sonic is going to be the only thing people talk about

[@amtrakisveryepic4169]

Ugly sonic and B.O.B from monsters vs aliens finally making it to the big screen after 13 years automatically makes this a 10/10 lmao

[@BunnyStarTelevision]

I LOVED MvA as a kid and that made me really happy

[@baryardeni9731]

I must say: I love this movie, from the style, to the plot, to the surprising cameos, but there are still some questionable choices I had with it, and I’m not just talking about their voices. Which one to start…? SPOILERS 1. The decision to keep Dale in CGI - I don’t know, I think it kinda takes off a bit of their taste to keep one in 2D and one in 3D. As a stylistic choice it works, but not permanently. 2. Not turning back all the ones who has been bootleged - I know, maybe they did turn them back to normal, but it was never made clear enough asides from Chip and Monterey Jack. I think that "showing, not telling" was kind of necessary in here. 3. Gadget and Zipper ended up getting married and having with children - Really? these 2? I don’t know, I don’t feel so completed with it. Throughout the cartoon they didn’t have a lot of chemistry between each other, and… I don’t know… A mouse and a fly? Zipper was already showing interest in a Queen Bee that asked for their help in one episode, and Gadget did had much more chemistry with Chip and Dale. But I guess they did remember that both of them already had other girls who fell over them in the cartoon (Tammy on Chip and Foxglove on Dale), and that they’re also already sharing the same girlfriend (Clarice, according to "Two Chips and a Miss"), so I guess they had to do some next steps with Gadget, but still… Quite bizarre for me. 4. Peter Pan remaining evil - Same with #2. I honestly think it kinda ruined Peter Pan that many people loved. I think it could’ve work so much better if he by himself was a bootleg victim as well. I do think this movie is splendid 90%, but in 10% I still had some thought to get over.

[@MILDMONSTER1234]

The Peter Pan stuff is questionable considering it mirrors the real-life actor Bobby Driscoll to a t but maybe that's due the fact that allegedly the movie went through script rewrites and a different Villain at one point but overall The movies basically just a less funny version of Who Framed Rodger rabbit

[@Ghosssttttttt]

I personally really enjoyed the movie, Chip and Dale are interesting characters in my opinion I think their relationship/dynamic was nice and made the movie very enjoyable I like the scene where chip talked to Dale while he thought he was dead was very well handled I liked the mystery aspect of the movie nothing amazing but pretty good I would get this movie an 7 or 8 out of 10

[@DillonMaynard]

The movie definitely exceeded my expectations. I wouldn't mind seeing another movie in the same universe.

[@jakoblent4694]

Its called Who Framed roger rabbit

[@getmario64]

I think it's a fine movie. It felt like a "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" follow-up where all cartoon characters from Toon Town existed in this weird universe and they liberate the entire live-action world so that cartoons could be free and do whatever they want. Chip N Dale in this movie worked okay and it's becoming like a buddy comedy film where two little critters which they based on Disney Afternoon and then go on a wacky crime adventure which worked just fine and I thought it will be weak they release two trailers so I went seeing it and they manage to make it nostalgia, fan-service, and homage moments like fans used to watch in Disney Afternoon. Some of the licensed cartoon characters were all random and some of them were in mend based on Disney characters that were properly well done with Easter eggs and they have changed with awkward moments that they exist with change purposes in the movie. Even Ugly Sonic looks weird and I didn't find that interesting or very funny to me and all of them just felt very forced like putting Batman Vs ET was pretty annoying. Would have a Marvel character to fight over Predator so why put Batman in it? At least they forced "Free Guy" to put Captain America shield in this 20th Century Studio because prop the party of Disney. Anyways it's a good movie and worth watching and I can see how they wanted to have a nostalgia fan service of Rescue Rangers and worked well than Space Jam 2. By the way, Zipper and Gadget's real relationship was soooooo odd when they mention and imagine Jessica and Roger Rabbits have their kids which it's strangely weird.

[@_Baku]

...was this written by an AI?

[@dcscruz2970]

I felt the last ship with gadget was weird as hell. Like we didn’t know (the fly) was their age until he spoke like??

[@KarlFrajja]

I can acknowledge that this is technically just a middle of the road film, but I got a lot of enjoyment out of it, but maybe for the wrong reasons. I found a lot of the stuff that I don't think was supposed to be really funny funnier than the stuff they thought would be hilarious. Though the funniest thing in the film imo was ugly Sonic lmao.

[@wadi_kazi]

The movie gets an automatic 10/10 for ugly Sonic let’s be honest guys

[@AttemptedVoices]

@no way back You don’t have a show with the FBI, Ugly Sonic! Stop trying to share the link!

[@ProGremlinPlayer]

chip n dale 2 should be ugly sonic's origin story

[@moth_luvrr]

agreed

[@soapbiter36577]

Sounds like the kind of person being described in the video.

[@maccamachine]

nope that doesn’t mean shit😐

[@Kalizoid]

I saw the movie with my friend last night. Going in blind, we just found to to be an enjoyable time. I feel like it’s best as one of those “shut your brain off” movies. Where you just have a good time and don’t really look for anything all too special. While I agree with it being mostly style over substance, sometimes it’s good to have a movie that can do just that but still be a good time.

[@yeoboseyoitsrebel-metaloid]

I’m glad to know I’m not the only one who found it kinda distasteful that they made Peter Pan’s back story almost completely the same as his original voice actor’s (y’know, minus the heroin overdose). That whole thing just really rubbed me the wrong way, I get what they were going for, but like c’mon, they *had* to have known.

[@Capsirus]

This movie was okay, but I really didn’t like how they did Peter’s story. For those who don’t know, in the film, Peter becomes basically a mob boss type character who bootlegs characters and uses them for those type of mockbuster films like Ratatoing. Admittedly, that’s an entertaining concept. How they handled it however, was not. Basically, after the first Peter Pan movie, Peter hit puberty, became a teenager and was no longer wanted as an actor for films. So he decided to kidnap other cartoon characters and bootleg them after he made a bootleg Peter Pan film. Sounds harmless right? That is until you realize that the Voice Actor for Peter Pan in the first movie was a child actor who hit puberty, became a teenager and while he did make more films as an adult instead of becoming a Mob Boss, he unfortunately died at the age of 31.

[@ironmaster6496]

Not only that but they made him the main villain that is beyond insulting

[@colekiesler6218]

You know there always can be a film where we can all give a chance for it and after seeing Chip n Dale was definitely no exception but I can see your opinion.

[@Klonoahedgehog]

I like the joke with Sonic, like i know it's just making fun of the movie design but him saying "Can't hurt my feelings if i'm in on the joke" feels like a jab at how Sega as a whole has treated the character over the past decade.

[@koichidignitythief7429]

Apparently Peter Pan was supposed just the henchmen for the real villain of the movie, in the first draft. THe real villain was Pluto and apparently Disney didn't liked that and wanted to back it up with a test screening.

[@keshiaanders6452]

That wouldn't be the first time Pluto did something very malicious. Examples: "Pluto's Judgement Day" The middle part of "To Lend a Paw"

[@Flip-a-dip-dip]

My favorite aspect of the movie is all the animation jokes. Especially the uncanny valley part. I love that the coke polar bear character was apart of it. I was also really shocked to see Randy marsh just chilling in a Disney movie.

[@huntercool2232]

The only thing that really bugs me is what they did to Bobby Discroll when introducing Peter Pan as the main villain. The fact that they made his backstory identical to the real life kid who played Peter Pan in the 1953 movie is tasteless. Disney threw Bobby Driscoll to the curb, and he ended up dying on the streets. And now, 50 years later, it's being used as a joke in a Disney movie. Apparently his actual worth meant nothing to them, but his story did. Real classy Disney.

[@misswonnykins9841]

I watched this with my sister, who's a bit of a Disney nut, and my best friend who's notoriously critical of movies. It was definitely a 'spot the reference' film, but we had a great time with it. Some of the cameo characters made us laugh so much (our favorites were Gucci Dobby and RIP Sora). I didn't mind the plot, honestly. It was very simple and you could see the twists coming (which the movie itself touched on a few times), but overall the whole Bootlegging thing felt kinda funny. It's something that does happen a lot and I thought the in-universe explanation was kinda clever. It's a fun time. Not amazing, but fun.

[@grapeshot]

They're probably never catch that magic of Who Framed Rodger Rabbit again.

[@kezottle]

I totally agree with your point. Having quirky and funny references doesn't automatically make the movie good

[@TheRibottoStudios]

This movie tries to make commentary on things like CG vs traditional animation when Chip himself IS ALSO CG animation just cel shaded to look traditional. It tried to talk about Peter's backstory but since the character of Peter pan has no sympathy it falls flat and just makes it look like Disney is patting itself on the back for even bringing it up. It tried to go both ball to the wall and take itself seriously and it failed at both. I'm so tired of this notion that newer tech = better animation. I'd rather watch a 30 second clip of Bugs and Mickey taking in Who framed Roger Rabbit a movie released in 1988 over this 2022 modern day film any day. Why? It isn't trying to make fun of either character. It's better animated. It isn't trying to be one thing or another. WFRR works where this fails because it focused on the actual story. The cameos are the icing on the cake, the cake being Eddie, Roger, Jessica, the villain and story. Here the story gets lost in the cameos and then tries to regroup but fumbles.

[@theGDmenace13]

Am I the only one that finds it incredibly weird that this is probably the biggest crossover in history but nobody cared and they kind of just Shadow dropped it let alone being Chip and Dale related

[@wowitsrg]

Oh wow, while watching the movie I didn’t even realize that Chip and Dale voluntarily jumped into that machine. That’s hilarious 😂

[@ledetbrothers9210]

I was surprisingly ok with this movie. It felt like a spiritual successor to Who Framed Roger Rabbit in some ways, especially in the flashback sequence at the beginning. I’m happy to see hand-drawn animation returning to movies at the very least.

[@roxanne_]

Hate to break it to you fam, it ain’t hand drawn. It’s just cgi to make it LOOK hand drawn, that’s why it’s a little weird to look at. Disappointed that they won’t even pay or let 2D animators to draw anymore. It’s probably one of the things I didn’t like in this movie.

[@ledetbrothers9210]

@@roxanne_ I’m not talking about Chip and Sweet Pete, who are cel-shaded 3D models. I’m talking about the background characters that *are* hand-drawn.

[@SlyDante]

I came away from the movie thinking it was...fine. Just fine. Though annoyingly, it's one of those pieces of entertainment that, despite being passable, I have more to complain about or nitpick than actually applaud. It's kind of trying to be a hybrid of a modern Rescue Rangers adventure & a meta-style Who Framed Roger Rabbit? successor that, if it succeeds, is in SPITE of its combination rather than because of it. On the Rescue Rangers side of things, it fails because, as you mentioned, the Rescue Rangers barely have anything to do with the actually story. Hell, outside of opening flashbacks, Gadget and Zipper don't even appear until SEVENTY MINUTES IN, & what they did with those characters is...an abomination against god, to say the least. It's just really uninterested in actually looking at the Rescue Rangers, their personalities (Chip & Dale are basically little more than an '80s buddy cop duo), or what they mean to fans, despite the film's token human character being a massive Rescue Rangers fangirl (a character that sadly gives KiKi Layne barely anything to do). On the Roger Rabbit side of things, while it does have some clever ideas that would fit right in there, like the whole "bootlegging" setup being a twisted toon version of human trafficking or the Main Street USA expy being populated by wholesome-looking characters who actually used their images to cover up illegal activities, the Simpsons & Daria-styled characters in the opening school scene helping to imply this was before such characters got their big break, and a couple of others, you can always tell that The Mouse is clearly holding back when it comes to providing any crossover material (again, the only significant Non-Disney cameo is a giant joke about one of their competitors f*cking up, if anything). We don't exactly get any Donald vs. Daffy piano duets, to say the least. Pretty much the majority of the cameos are just...there. Just sitting or standing around, never speaking. And as such, it never really gives as big an illusion of this giant cartoon side of Hollywood as it should. Hell, it doesn't even reach Ready Player One levels of spectacle. there's not really much in the way of commentary either, just "Boy, reboots are silly & Hollywood is pretty unoriginal" (pot calling the kettle black there), mostly limited to one scene with Chip looking at posters on the street, including one gender-flipped film that I am sadly 100% convinced that Disney will try to make a reality. And I have one of the same complaints here that I did with Space Jam: A New Legacy: Where the hell are all of the modern cartoon characters?? A New Legacy had no Steven Universe, Adventure Time, We Bare Bears, et cetera, & Rescue Rangers has no Amphibia, Owl House, Gravity Falls, et cetera (allegedly a couple appear at the end, but A. if so, only for the briefest of moments, & B. they do so in off-model, unrecognizable forms). And yeah, that's probably me just mad at what could or should have been, but if this is supposed to a satire about modern entertainment, why the hell NOT do any actual satire about modern animation, the contrast between cartoons then & now, et cetera? Why act like absolutely zero cartoons of note existed in the 2010s & beyond, despite having some of the most notable animations productions in those years? And not just Rick and Morty, just a Rick and Morty nod doesn't count, and weird that BOTH movies went that route... There are other things that hinder the film, like the awful animation for the 2D characters mentioned in the video, the confusing rules as to how things work in this universe (like how a toon like Peter Pan can physically grow up, but Chip isn't seemingly any older after 30 years, and one of the Lost Boys DOESN'T grow up, & what about Return to Neverland or the Kingdom Hearts games...f*ck, the headaches are coming again, abandoning this), some groan-worthy jokes like the Modern Simpsons-style thing mentioned where they joke about certain cliches are lame but then do them anyway, but there are some good jokes that land as well, some decent action at times, a few clever bits, &...yeah, see what I mean? Okay film, but kind of tough to actually praise. 6/10, better than expected, but totally unimpressive in the areas where it counts.

[@SwaggyG_2102]

Funny that you mention how Peter Pan works more of a henchmen to an actual villain, considering how, according to leaks on 4Chan, the original villain was intended to be Pluto, but was changed due to a lackluster audience reaction while performing a stage screening.

[@CalvinChikelue]

I'm actually so glad to see a review that's closer to the same page as me. I had zero interest in this until the suggestions from a few reviews about how it's setting & premise kind of placed it in the position of a soft Who framed Roger Rabbit sequel. So I watched it seeing the praise but halfway through finally understood why 90% of the related YT vids were either "Return of Ugly Sonic!1" or "References Compilation #9956". From the premise to the use of mixed media it really has the tools to go somewhere but just doesn't and lands at moderately better than complete dreck like Space Jam 2 or Tom & Jerry. Like instead of getting the band back together from the jump they instead just rope in a paper thin human detective to help them with the case. They reference Zipper & Gadget but neglect to go to them immediately when the 5th member of their on-screen family is kidnapped into a torturous fate & the threat has been overwhelming? Really? Hell, in the scene where they're about to join forces with the human officer, they say the word "bonkers" & I 100 % expected the next beat to be them deciding to bring in a fellow Disney Toon alum, Bonkers to help them on the case whose entire show was about being a toon cop solving toon crime which would have been really fun. But no they just get the generic human lady to be their superfluous third wheel. That so much speaks to your point where it feels like it could have been any characters in the role rather than Chip & Dale. Another misstep I think was Peter Pan (beyond the gross allusions to the original VA's life) just being an old dumpy thug which is the the weakest direction they could have gone. Why not do the more interesting thing and just leave him as the eternal kid except having grown a sadistic streak that fit the darker aspects that the character actually has. I actually read a manhwa a while ago that was a horror series with the premise of Peter Pan being a type of boogeyman figure that was really cool & they could have done something close here but didn't. Like in the mythology of the film it doesn't seem that old cartoons either in color or B&W get absolutely ancient & retain their original designs through the years...but they decided to break that mythos specifically for the one character it doesn't make sense to break it for. Honestly by the time they reach Dale's garage with his Rescue Rangers memorabilia, instead of watching the rest of the movie, I just felt like turning it off and just re-watching the actual series & Disney Afternoon's other gems. I'm glad others enjoyed it & I'll probably pick at the rest of it till I finish it but it is not as stellar as so many reviews seem to suggest to me. It almost has it but like you said, references aren't a substitute for compelling writing. Did love the new remix of the Rescue Rangers theme.

[@arandomperson1046]

I loved how I agree with Mark that the movie is okay I feel like they put too much cameos,reference so people can get distracted

[@TheDigitalApple]

The ugly Sonic scenes have inspired me to start the #releasetheuglySoniccut for the first Sonic movie!

[@falendemo546]

Digital Apple --- #releasethenightmarecut is better than #releasetheuglySoniccut for me atleast.

[@gumballviking9102]

Honestly the more I think about it the more I realize how little sense Peter Pan makes as an antagonist, at least as someone who hasn't seen the movie yet (It might be explained in the movie so maybe I'm just missing something). From the looks of it, it doesn't seem like cartoon characters can even age visibly for the most part, so why would Peter be the exception? Also given how everything in this movie is a reference they probably made Peter the antagonist because of the tragic story of his voice actor for way back when. If that's the case that's downright heartless

[@Jean-Paul-Lane-Valley]

People keep comparing this to Roger Rabbit in terms of entertainment quality, yet I remember liking Roger Rabbit for presenting an interesting world with a fun story and some great animation, all three things being replaced by references in this movie.

[@snazzzzy]

i do wish we got a modern film based on the original rescue rangers series though 😔

[@KevinAlsephone]

I was kinda interested remembering the show. But what made me really want to watch it was the man,myth, and legend, Old Movie Sonic. As well as a redeeming end for a underrated Sonic. I never hated the old design, was more worried about the script at the time. But joyed to see the old design get some love at last. The movie over all is basic and enjoyable if you love Rodger Rabbit world, a fan of Chip and Dale. The usual stuff you'd expect with these kind of movies.

[@jesseallen2415]

Ok there is one problem that I have with the movie and that is how the actual fuck were chip and dale in Donald duck cartoons, made before the 1980's also weren't they in shows after rescue rangers, and another how is peter pan older when he is literally in a sequel to his original movie, oh and if cartoon characters age the shouldn't characters like Mickey, donald, goofy and especially scrooge have either been old as shit or dead

[@Ubylmoen]

You know its just refreshing to see a KZbin critic be so vocal about how much they don't like a popular, mainstream movie from a major corporation. Its just not something you see everyday. Definitely a unique video! Ten out of ten, would watch again!

[@LowellLucasJr.]

Honestly, I say the movies ok, even though there were great Easter eggs and cameos! My only problem was with Chip being a 3D model with a 2D artstyle graphed on! I found it rather odd Chip, of all people, were to talk about 'Silicon Valley' and saying how 'unnatural it looked'. Outside of that, I was pretty enjoyable! 80s properties merging with modern animation that's something not seen since Roger Rabbit/ Gumball!' Loved it!

[@HJF]

Chip and deal…

[@DimeUhDozen]

As for the 1980’s Simpsons cameo, I think I know how that could possibly make sense. Since the characters are actors in this universe, it’s possible that this was just them before they got the job and entered the spotlight. Although Chip and Dale were characters even before that so I dunno. I don’t think consistency was the first thing on the writers’ minds when making this film anyways. Cool that Roger Rabbit is canon to this movie though.

[@carlycrays2831]

I think the implication is that studios replace the actors with newer, more attractive ones

[@jakoblent4694]

@@carlycrays2831 or force them to go through surgery that makes them more "appealing" like the CGI surgery

[@RyderPlatinumWarpstar]

I thought it was okay. There was a lot of moments that made me eyeroll like when they acknowledge that people wouldn't like if they do something and then do it anyways, like the rapping thing or at the end of the movie where they talk about how people want to hear the original Chip 'n Dale theme instead of a pop-star version of it, but then play the pop-star version for the credits anyways. That and also Disney taking jabs at themselves, like when they included they referenced live action Lion King, it's like, yeah making fun of yourselves doesn't suddenly make live action remakes okay, Disney. Though it was funnier when they took jabs at things from other companies, like Ugly Sonic, which was actually kinda funny. But it was enjoyable for the most part. To be honest, even though I know it was the point, I honestly kinda wish all of the rescue rangers characters were just 2D looking. Not a bad movie imo. But I can't help but wonder if this movie is gonna become really dated in the future with all of the jabs at themselves.

[@neonthunder3261]

The self-jabs, if its as Mark described, seem more sad than of any value. Like a really bad attempt to be relatable, but they're also the ones perpetrating these constant reboots and mediocre revivals. Also peter pan is entirely distasteful.

[@DuelaDent52]

Between this and Once Upon A Time, what’s with Disney’s weird loathing of Peter Pan?

[@TurboPikachu]

I haven’t seen the film, but normal-sounding voices for Chip & Dale wasn’t a bad idea, just not executed particularly well (and the flip-flopping between normal and chipmunk effects, at best, is jarring). Ducktales 2017 knocked it out of the park with the casting for Huey, Dewey, and Louie. I would have **loved** a Chip & Dale 2D reboot series made by the DuckTales 2017 team, played straight with well thought out casting and no “chipmunk” effect at all, much like how the three nephews’ voices in DT2017 lost their “duckisms” but became very distinct from one another

[@SandwitchZebra]

It seriously is honestly shocking how many Disney deep-cuts they went for. Example: the tiger lady who speaks to Ugly Sonic is Tigra, a Marvel character. This version of her (and the pictures behind her) is directly ripped from the shitty first Avengers cartoon (United We Stand) from the 90’s, which has since become semi-obscure especially with Marvel’s recent mega-boom.

[@Dr.Sho_Minamimoto]

Honestly two things rubbed me the wrong way was the Peter Pan being the villain due to the history of Disney and them treating the original actor. The other was Gadget getting “ *FLYED* “ and the disgusting implications involved with a mouse birthing mutant fly-mouse hybrids. It makes it worse if you’ve been on the internet and have witnessed the “infestation” tag.

[@bradfork6853]

Every live-action/animation movie that has ever been made and all the future ones will forever remain under the shadow of Who Framed Roger Rabbit, a film that remembers that beneath all the fancy special effects and cameos what ultimately counts is having heart, great characters and an engaging plot. Why can't all these other ones do the same.

[@Its_Bam_Bam]

4:59, I hope they know silly puddy is still a thing lmao, u just grew up

[@J-leaf]

If you HAVE to like the movie, then you gotta love the aspect of forgotten cartoons never getting recognition or attention nowadays. I personally thought the movie was 6/10, the references was cool, never thought I'd say this but Ugly Sonic is the best character, the detective story was an eh? Didn't hate it or love it, it was just kinda there, and the whole aspect bootlegging being the worse form of punishment was kinda hilarious, just saying they should have kept the operation in China, they never would have guessed it. Again Subjectively the movie is 6 or 7 out of 10, Objectively.....probably a 5/10

[@klimmr]

7:05 Um, Rescue Rangers wasn't on the air either in 1982. This was BEFORE they all got their big breaks!

[@drakenastee]

I gotta say I genuinely enjoyed the film as sure there were tons of references in the film (one of which the whole internet won’t stop talking about which even then his portrayal was something that actually made people love the character) but they didn’t interfere with the flow of the movie and what they were going with, like the whole concept of Peter Pan as the main antagonist was a good concept and the whole idea for him to go forward attempting to make knock-off’s films to avoid licensing was genuinely a good twist then just “they dropped me so it’s revenge”, but for me after watching it I was more wondering how much licensing did they sign and agree too to green lit as the non-Disney characters being involved must of been difficult. Overall I’d say a solid 7.5/10, there was still things that it needed work on but I quite liked it a lot.

[@DrachonaTheWolf]

I just can't get over how bad the animation is. You would expect a movie that came out 34 years after Who Framed Roger Rabbit would look significantly better, not objectively worse. Even the cheap animation for He-Man from the early 80's looks better than their recreation of it.

[@maralmindeity5332]

I noticed that 2d animation for random characters looks better than main characters and villain

[@DrachonaTheWolf]

@@maralmindeity5332 Some of it is a little better. The cel-shading is terrible, but even some of the flat 2D characters look cheap. Not bad coloring or line-work, just weirdly animated. Also, the greenscreen bodysuit shots with actual actors is just uncanny.

[@TimmyDaTurtle]

I'm gonna be honest, I love how the movie makes fun of other movies being "uncanny" when there are scenes not even referencing it that feel uncanny. The movie's plot didn't really do anything new, rather they went "hey, do you remember this movie". There are other movies that pull off crossovers better, such as Rodger Rabbit. There were also a few adult animation references that I didn't get. Big mouth being in a movie being marketed as PG really makes me wonder "why is this a thing"

[@shacharlem4424]

I thought the movie was fun. I think it's world building has lots of potential. By the way, here are Some fun facts about the Hebrew cast: 1.Chip and Dale in the Hebrew dub are voiced by Danny Leshman and Dan Kiesler. Danny Leshman (Chip's Hebrew voice actor) is also the Hebrew voice of King (the Owl House), forky (toy story 4), timon (the lion guard and the lion king live action remake), flash (Zootopia) and Orson (the adventures of buck wild), while dan kiesler (dale's Hebrew voice actor) is the Hebrew voice of sonic (adventures of sonic the Hedgehog/wreck it Ralph), "why were you born" lovat (Coraline), Jay Gordon (Ninjago), bling bling boy (johnny test), Gideon gleeful (gravity falls), Eddie (ice age: continental drift and collision course), ron stoppable (kim possible), coby (one piece), blu (rio and rio 2), Rigby (regular show), Felix the cat (the twisted Tales Of Felix the cat), keroro (sgt.frog) and Theodore (ALVINNN!!! and The Chipmunks). 2. Sweet pete in the Hebrew dub is voiced by Gadi Levy, who is also known as the Hebrew voice of tom dupain (miraculous: tales of ladybug and cat noir), emperor belos, principal bump and Gilbert (all from the owl house), gus (rocket monkeys), Duncan MacDougall (Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore), chester v (cloudy with a chance of meatballs 2), discord (my little pony: friendship is magic), walter Jr. (Minions), Janitor Russ Poopatine (fanboy and Chum Chum), Leatherbeak (free birds), turner, rusty and abuelito (all from handy manny), Griffin the Invisible Man ((hotel Transylvania) along with the skeleton husband and a pilot), skully (jake and the Neverland pirates), Lorenzo Paguro (luca), dr. Randell mindy (don't look up) and would later become the Hebrew voice of Homelander (the boys).

[@XJoe360]

This is one of the most deplorable pieces of corporate slop Disney has ever produced

[@leonengine1768]

to answer your question at 3:51. No not really, I'm one of the few people out there who has seen the older series back then when it was on television, it was one of my favorite cartoons of all time when I was little, but this movie is nothing like how the older series was, the whole movie is basically a whole big ass shitpost film that, I should like it for what it is. but because of it's rushed plot along with so many characters from different franchises. it felt like it was trying too hard to be cool with how meta they could be. and that made me roll my eyes, if there's something good that I could say about the movie, it's that it's making me wanna go back and rewatch the older series again for nostalgia reasons haha

[@SimplySunky]

I didn't watch the Chip 'N Dale movie yet, but after watching the trailers, I knew this film is going to be remembered by the cameos and refences than the super mediocre plot.

[@carlycrays2831]

I didn't mind it, though. The plot was simple, but it felt like it made sense for the world.

[@angryferb1079]

This movie is why I'm glad Calvin and Hobbes will always be a comic strip from the 80s and 90s. Not something that can be made for $ like Snoopy, Garfield, or others.

[@hnaw1360]

I don't know... I think that you shouldn't give it points for being a big cross over, since it kind of felt like they were trying to be a Who Framed Rodger Rabbit 2. Kind of felt like they were forcing in references to other stuff, like different media's of animation and stuff to replicate it. With Rodger even appearing in the movie. Not sure though

[@juanletsplay1550]

Rest in peace to Peter Pan's voice actor.

[@trevorswims5754]

I hate the fact that movies with lots of cameos or character crossovers are seen as movie company cash grabs or just them flexing their properties in your face for an hour and a half. I actually really love movies that do those types of things, including movies that feature real humans interacting with two dimensional cartoon characters, as long as it's not done in a crappy way or done in a way where it doesn't make sense. The chip and dale movie wasn't bad, but it was good. I love how they tried to have a world filled with characters with all kinds of different animation styles.

[@carlycrays2831]

I definitely think a lot of time and care went into these cameos. It felt like a real love letter to animation as a whole

[@himdevil2391]

But that's exactly what they are half the time. Disney has done this before with wreck it Ralph 2. But don't worry, I'm sorry we hurt the million-dollar companies' feelings. I

[@trevorswims5754]

@@himdevil2391 I 100% agree with the fact that Wreck it Ralph 2 sucked ass.

[@brendanblair64]

I watched the movie when I woke up purely for Ugly Sonic and thought it was okay too. Fun premise, I just didn't think it was very funny. I thought it was weird when I saw exclusively praise on my timeline on Twitter. Like I'm happy people like it more than me, I just don't see it.

[@n19ntendods]

You’ve tackled Scooby-Doo, Alvin and the Chipmunks, The Smurfs, Detective Pikachu, Tom and Jerry, Sonic the Hedgehog…. Please give us a video on the Garfield movies! 🥺🥺🥺🙏🐈👑 I hate Mondays! 😒

[@SoranotRoxas]

Honestly, this is the best version of Ready Player One, and Space Jam 2. Also I give it credit for having a coherent story. It probably could of went to theaters and been fine. The only problem I have is the human characters...They're just not as good as Roger Rabbit ones

[@F1rebird09]

This movie is for new rockstars to stop every one second and point out everything there is

[@hlavco]

The movie was kinda fun, but I left with a few questions: 1. Why was Peter the only toon that aged? They showed one of the other kids from his movie in the modern day, and he was still a kid. 2. Why does the movie act as though Chip'n'Dale didn't exist before Rescue Rangers? They've been around longer than Disney's Peter Pan has. 3. If Peter's motivation for turning evil is dissatisfaction with his appearance, why didn't he just use that machine he owns that changes cartoon characters' appearances?

[@Na-mi3dx]

In a way, I appreciate that it isn’t just Disney properties like it was with the Warner crossover movies. It makes it feel a lot less like a company circle jerk.

[@popuied6688]

6:59 Nah this makes perfect sense. That Simpsons character wasn't in the show yet because like you said, the show didn't exist, it's because he's in school. It's the same for Chip and Dale, their show doesn't exist because they're just kids going to School. They just met each other there and the montage showed them building up to when they decided to make the show.

[@larpdude7308]

Peter doesn't even make sense as a villain. If we're supposed to believe it's the same universe as Who Framed Roger Rabbit, then how did he age in the first place? There's a whole scene in Roger where Baby Herman laments how he's an old man in a baby's body. Wouldn't that also happen to Peter? If not, why?

[@DranaisBotan]

Whooo! I’m a huge fan of the original series and you touched on all of my issues. But yeah I came out as meh. I’ll admit the references were fun but not enough for me to praise it. Also the Bobby Driscoll Peter Pan thing bugged me from his first trailer appearance and gadget and zipper fucking kept me grounded the entire time as I couldn’t look passed it.