The Rolex Submariner VS Omega Seamaster 300M - A Clash Of The Titans!

Today we answer the much asked question. The Rolex Submariner VS Omega Seamaster 300m, who wins?
Shop now for all Omega watches : www.chisholmhu...
Shop now for all Pre-owned Rolex Watches: www.chisholmhu...
OUR NEW PERSONAL INSTAGRAM: / chisholmhunterwatches
Chisholm Hunter Instagram: / chisholmhunter
Facebook: https: / chisholmhunterofficial
My Personal KZbin: / harrisonbrownscotland
Chisholm Hunter is Scotland's largest Luxury Watch retailer and one of the largest in the UK with over 28 stores throughout the United Kingdom. With brands such as Omega, Breguet, Vacheron Constantin, Longines, Tudor, Zenith, Blancpain and many more. Multiple Jeweller of the Year - Three years running.
Discover more exceptional watches at www.chisholmhu...

[@sergesmets5685]

Personal experience . I was in the market for a high grade watch long time ago , and the choice back then was a Rolex or a Omega . More specific a Omega PO and the Rolex you showed . In those days (2007) the Rolex was easy available and it was just a preference of choice , since the price was not that far apart either. I chose the PO ( if i remember correct 2209.50.00) Omega , and i did get over the years many many comments on how good it looked . This y i was on the market again , for several reasons , and i still like the Rolex , but those prices exploded , to a value which i cannot understand . I still got my daily Omega PO , and it has doubled in value but the Rolex has got at least 3 times value . Anyway , i went in the shop for a Moonwatch , and came home with the black 300M ( like you got in this vid) but with the steel strap . The Omega's are great watches and the Rolex's are also , but the value of Rolex is imho overstretched . Sure they got a good watch , everything in it . But the value vs a Omega , naah i don't see it . Everybody got their choice , i'd love to own a Rolex Batman 1 day , but not in current day values .

[@steveb4012]

I couldn't agree more, 8 also gave an Omega PO 2007 vintage, Casino Royale version, love the watch ( Bond Fan) but admit I never considered a Rolex back then. I have a 2006 300m too. The Subs and Explorer are the two Rolex I like but I will never own them, I don't want to afford them or have the anxiety of it on my wrist OR, the servicing costs. They look good, but the Omegas are cooler! 😜

[@steelsteez6118]

This.

[@edwardpetersii6276]

I agree, as well! I could’ve bought Rolex back in the day but never considered them because they never appealed to me! However, Omega has appealed to me! I just prefer Omega! I live all their watches!

[@HarrisonBrownsLife]

Can't beat Omega ✅️

[@ivanharlokin]

Purely as a tool, I agree, but aesthetically you can certainly beat the Omega's ugly and unless HEV, the poor and ugly bracelet, and the AR coating on the outside of the crystal.

[@Thommyw12345]

@@ivanharlokin the AR of the Crystal is great, so what Problem you see there?

[@nishantprakash5928]

@@Thommyw12345 AR coatings outside the crystal can scratch. So you will have to send it back to your AD to get it fixed. If it can scratch easily, it kind of defeats the purpose of having a sapphire crystal.

[@mickeydee3595]

@@nishantprakash5928 Yes I agree that AR coatings can scratch and makes having sapphire kind of pointless..... However now that I have the 300m I'm constantly blown away at how little reflection the crystal gives off. Most times its like there is no glass there.

[@nishantprakash5928]

@@mickeydee3595 good for you, congrats for the watch:)

[@JamesAlexander14]

For me the Omega will win all the way. I just haven’t got the time, the money and the available life span to buy the Rolex, plus I cannot stand that bubble over the date. Omega wins hands down!

[@Distorted-Vision]

There is a non-date Submariner, which I prefer as I hate the cyclops lens over the date window too.

[@NicolasMiari]

I don't hate the cyclops lens as a magnifier of the date, but it's bound to really annoy me whenever the watch hands come under it 😂

[@bboness713]

I'm wearing the black dial Omega SMP on bracelet. The dial on the Omega is what stands out to me as a clear advantage. When the SMP is in the sun the dial goes from black to an almost white color to a silver mirror depending on how the light hits. Along with the fact you can buy one at or below msrp makes it no contest and I believe the movement in the Omega has a slight edge as well.

[@Plally06]

I'm wearing the 2021 no date sub but I am equally in love with the Seamaster. You won't regret choosing one over the other but I suspect many will eventually spring for both (I know I will)

[@Matt-bg5wg]

i know i did, however once you've worn a Rolex bracelet... unfortunately the Seamaster steel bracelet just doesn't cut it. Fortunately putting the Omega rubber strap on it instead is an easy (and much better looking) fix.

[@SIZZO76]

@@Matt-bg5wg the bracelet is iconic

[@zsb707]

​​@@SIZZO76Yes it is. Plus it's very comfortable and looks nice.

[@bigblue7091]

Think I'll have { Omega & Zenith } for the Price of The ROLEX "... Personal Preference goes a Long Way

[@carguy3645]

The Omega is a better watch. Hands down

[@torontowatches9709]

I own the 41mm Sub TT LN, wonderful watch it’s actually 12.4mm thick and case measures at 40.5mm. Love how far Seamasters have come it’s such an amazing fun watch! Omega should update the bracelet and put the 3 link speedy bracelet as well as fix the bezel imo. The watch is superb on rubber and for the price it’s untouchable! Really fun review! Truly enjoyed it and great work in your channel mate!

[@infooptimalfitness7720]

Agree. The Omega bracelet is rubbish. Looks old and from the 90s.

[@followyourpassion8378]

I think, it really needs a folding clasp for the rubber strap.

[@walterdonnachie7995]

I got the black omega sm300 for my birthday and love it ,although it’s a close call with the submariner the wave dial on the omega wins it for me and when you take the price into account it’s a no contest Omega all day long 👍

[@serifdincer208]

That omega with rubber strap looks amazing

[@richieyee73]

That's the exact one I got. Love it!

[@jeromef.5489]

I own both Rolex Seadweller and the Omega blue ceramic, love both 💙

[@jimlittle5769]

I bought a Seamaster 300M in late 2020. I had wanted it for 25 years. I was offered a Sub from an AD last year after the guy who ordered it decided not to get it. I had never requested it nor showed interest in it so I politely declined. Also, let's not forget. The Omega is half the price of Rolex at MSRP and almost 1/4th the price of a Rolex at pre-owned prices.

[@danilom3166]

Which color did you get? Do you wear it on a steel bracelet or something else?

[@Matt-bg5wg]

oh man you turned down a Sub at an AD?

[@jimlittle5769]

@@danilom3166 I got the blue, and now wear it on Omega's rubber strap and deployant clasp they made available for the 300M from boutiques about 18 months ago. I wish they sold it on that one as opposed to the tradional rubber strap you can buy it on.

[@tricky92x]

@@Matt-bg5wgRight? Bad move. You can always just buy it, and sell it. You'd make a couple of grand just walking out the door.

[@moealyasini2784]

Omega for SURE man.. so much prettier and for what? Less money and available ? Let’s stop wanting Rolex just cuz it’s hard to get. If we were to like it just for what it is (build and design) the Omega will win always

[@giovannibucio]

both excellent choice but for me OMEGA more classic more sporty more cheaper not to say i cant afford a rolex but OMEGA is made more under pressure i asked 3 master-watch repair guys and they say rolex good but very fragile delicate and expensive to clean they said OMEGA last longer and is more accurate and in technology is far ahead of rolex. so now i have all gold seamaster300m from last year and a black with gold planet ocean from 2022 i use the both everyday and samsung watch wen i workout. but OMEGA is an eternal brand that doesent need no crowns.

[@davidtaylor6663]

I have both. Its a toss up. I like the weight of the Omega slightly better. But on any given day, either one I enjoy more. Great review BTW. Nice video!!!

[@steelsteez6118]

Nice David! U have good taste!

[@CartierCrash]

For a long time not considering the price, the Rolex sub was a much better watch (style, movement, build). However with the current Omega diver models they have overtaken the Rolex - open caseback with some decoration - better movement (newer, co axial, more certs) - better lume If it wasn’t for investment most would want a Omega over the Rolex

[@tricky92x]

I don't agree with your last sentence. I have both watches (blue Omega) and they both are on my wrist on very different occasions. They take up very different space in my collection.

[@EJMarro]

If I’m shopping, I’m taking the Omega without a doubt. If someone else is buying, I’ll take the Rolex, sell it, and get two Omegas 🙌🏽

[@gmund317]

Every collection needs to have both, even if it's only a 2-watch collection.

[@midas1929]

Yes, I love both brands, too.

[@barrelvisor]

100% Seamaster for me - the Sub might as well be made of hens teeth for how likely it is to actually see one you can buy. It might as well be fictitious for how unobtainable it is - take into account the 3x the cost between the watches it’s a no brainier. I can (and have) bought the SMP 300m in this vid because I could get hold of one. Rolex is now just the domain of those who are prepared to pay well over retail, and flippers that sell them, sadly.

[@bighands69]

Most people always settle for second best.

[@barrelvisor]

It depends on what you consider ‘second best’ I suppose. It’s probably best to keep some perspective, too. We’re talking about £4K+ watches…a mostly unnecessary piece of jewellery! It’s conspicuous consumption for the most part for some.

[@super1million11]

Why is the sub £16000? Subs are around $9000 usd if I’m not mistaken that should mean the sub is around £7-8000 when considering currency difference. Unless I got my currency’s mixed up. But then again the omega is priced right I’m sure someone more knowledgeable than me can answer this.

[@neilmullen3920]

I am lucky enough to own both watches. Both of them I have owned for about 20 years. Both were bought at AD’s at the price back then. I think the Omega was £1050 & the Rolex was £2350. I have used both watches equally & can say honestly that that Omega is twice the watch the Rolex is.

[@bighands69]

You are full of crap and everybody knows it.

[@troyus111]

I have both and disagree on two stand out points. The omegas bezel borders on unusable, way too stiff and minimal grip. The Rolex one is just perfect sound and feel. The omegas lume is also garbage. I just can’t read it at all at night unless it’s just been chucked under a lamp or something. The Rolex I don’t have to charge it anything special and it just works and is usable after dark.

[@claytonpemberton8587]

I own a Seamaster white dial and did own a Rolex 124060 from 2022...sold the Sub because I didn't see the appeal of owning both of them. The Oyster bracelet is wonderful, but the Seamaster is equally as comfortable on the bracelet. As someone who's owned both of them, just buy a Seamaster on the bracelet and save the difference you'd have to spend for a Sub (4.5k above the Seamaster for the "No Date" at retail in addition to the waiting list).

[@seabiscuit726142]

Dude, learn how to pronunce OMEGA, please! It's a Greek word not an English one.

[@ukjamaican4488]

You know what timepiece he’s referring to though since it was in his hand pretty much the entire video. Do you correct all the Americans on here that mispronounce literally EVERY European brand from Adidas to Audi to Balmain?? Probably not so STFU 🤫

[@justreallybored6014]

It doesnt really matter in the end. You cant buy a Rolex without waiting 2 years and Omega shelves are full. Just get the Omega and forgot the Rolex.

[@a_watch_enthusiast2149]

I own a blue dial seamaster 300m and wearing it now on a brown leather strap that i chabhed out from a blue nato this morning. If I had to choose as iconic as the rolex is I'd pick the seamaster mainly because of the dial in design its more appealing to me i also prefer the bezelstyle. I prefer the bracelet on the rolex compared to the seamaster however I do prefer nato and rubber straps over bracelet. I say all this but if it was the hulk rolex all this goes out the window and I'm choosing that.

[@woopwoopiii]

mega > o-mega, not omeega

[@scottfrench6128]

Both are top quality. It comes down to personal preferences. Buy what you like.

[@jonasjonas5294]

On my wrist today is the stowa Flieger Klassik 40 🙂

[@philip8756]

Let's gooo team omega! Breguet Marie Antoinette is the coolest watch made by the company.

[@lestercaldera3776]

I have a rubber strap blue Omega and for the price Its just better

[@jxu-xi7ju]

Omega Seamaster 300M blue dial blue strap sedna gold is gorgeous

[@Mark-lj1dj]

I have the white dial seamaster. I was tempted by the black dial too. When you realise that you can have BOTH for the price of one submariner, it's a no brainer. Plus for me the seamaster is the better watch anyway

[@fredericperrin3279]

I have a Sub and a Seamaster Planet Ocean. Both are amazing. The beauty of the Rolex is that it can be worn on any occasion, from super formal to super casual. The Seamaster is more on the casual side. The sub is 3x the price of the Seamaster. It doesn't really make sense, but it is what it is. Recently I bought a Longines Hydroconquest, which is 3x cheaper than the Seamaster, and hence 9x cheaper than the Sub. And it's wonderful too. So you have a good choice for excellent diving watches at very different price points (well, you can't currently get a new Sub, but that's a different story).

[@danieloana3571]

You talk like Bark and Jack

[@boldaslion281]

Please stop trying to sound like bark and jack. The pace and way in which you phase your sentences is just like that guy

[@boldaslion281]

I like your reviews better now!

[@JJJosh949]

For me- I’d consider the omega if they addresses the following 1) 40mm 2) go back to the flat dial - remove waves 3) lose the pointless helium escape nipple 4) offer a no date version This to me would be a true competitor to the sub in my mind & would easily win a sub fan like myself over

[@Tannybou123]

Totally agree

[@SIZZO76]

The SEAMASTER is perfect the way that it is😊

[@steelsteez6118]

Hey Johny, I'm a big fan of both myself and while all your points would certainly make the SMP cleaner and more symmetrical, it would also make the seamaster faaaaar too similar to the sub imho. Flat dial, no HEV nipple, 40mm, no date.... Sounds like a 124060 to me 😂 (which I absolutely love btw). I just think they would be too redundant at that point. All the cool little motifs on the current SMP like the HEV, the ceramic ZR02 wave dial, 42mm,etc are all the cool differentiating features that makes me love and want to own both since they are different enough.

[@rusjhn]

Wearing an oldie but a goodie..... Tissot Le Locle Chronograph with 7750 movement white dial with crocodile strap.

[@olizk]

the one you can by tomorrow is the winner

[@robwoods5434]

The Omega with the rubber wristband looks so sharp for a more casual look.

[@leeharding8306]

£16.450 to look like a try hard 🤦🏻‍♂️ Get the Speedmaster and have 10k change.

[@scorpianbliz]

It's Rolex for me...however with that said: 1)I had to get my Submariner serviced three times in order for it to run as expected. But, never had any issues with my 300m or my 2 planet oceans. 2)I traded my 300m because I fell out of love with its impractical bezel design. It's not the grippiest. 3)I got bored with my planet oceans, although I loved the coin-edge bezels. 4)I also love the iconic cyclops and its 2.5 magnification practicality. The rolex oyster bracelet is the best looking in the business in my opinion.

[@albertohernandeza5661]

I think the Rolex is the better watch. But as a watch there is no way it is worthed 4x the Omega. If it was given to me I’d pick the Sub any time. If I was to buy one, no doubt I’d go for the Omega and be thrilled about it.

[@johnsonious2]

I personally think the Omega looks cooler, however the Rolex looks cleaner. But I can only afford Omega, so Omega wins 🤣

[@mrtommy8875]

Omegas value can’t be beat.

[@Aaron-fb1pq]

I love omega but the submariner is just too iconic.

[@danilom3166]

Then you're a 300m guy, I'd say,,,

[@jimiChaos13]

I own exact the same Seamaster like yours, I love Omega's accuracy (-30 sec/month) and the wave dial which is fantastic imo and legible, although I HATE the skeletonized hands especially at night, the date widow it's very small for two digit numbers and the openback it's ok but not quite necessary (it's not Patek or Lange manual wound chronos) I like the one way bezel but not the functionality. On the other hand Rolex is better on date window, bezel action, night legibility and of course on steel bracelet, I can't tell about accuracy but I know the new models are OK. All these it would be more relative if the price cost was similar, 'cause on VFM category there is NO comparison!!!

[@eagles4757]

Why do people think they have to choose?I have small collection 6 pieces 3 Rolex and 3 Omega have went up the horology tree and down but always comes back to them.Rolex SD 4000,GMT MASTER II Batman,Datejust 41 Fluted Blue dial,Omega 300m White dial,Omega 300 Black dial and Speedmaster Moonwatch.I love each one best of both worlds.Paid a lot more for the Rollies but don't enjoy them anymore than my Omega's.You have to own at least one Rolex thow to scratch that itch lol.

[@affegorilla1299]

Did you get your hands on the ceramic all black seamaster yet? 😜

[@jochenkey]

Both nice watches

[@MrFreddyd3]

Had 2 Seamaster 300 Pros. As well as 16610 Sub date, 16600 Sea Dweller, 114060 Sub, 126600 Red Sea Dweller. All purchased from my AD. Sold the Omegas, never cared for the mid-90s styling, perhaps this retro look will one day be big like 70s integrated bracelets are big today. Rolex all the way.

[@phantomphotography7392]

The Rolex is a superior watch but I will not purchase one because of the supply and demand manipulation they intentionally cause.

[@PrivateCustard]

What with the AD nonsense, forced scarcity, and grey market tomfuckery, Rolex may as well not even exist at this point. omega wins by default.

[@asura2545]

The one you can actually buy wins by default

[@briankenny6883]

Thank you! Most astute comment of all.

[@TestChannelWow-bh7ys]

if you buy an omega you’re cursed with talking about rolex for the rest of your life. I say just get the Rolex you truly want

[@carling4737sir]

I own a Seamaster because it was the best for my budget and i do indeed love it. But if i'm to be really honest, i would rather own the Rolex. West Ham v Rangers Euro Final???

[@LoganChannelVr]

Omega wins. You can’t go into a Rolex AD and buy one of the shelf. I don’t want to have a buying history with them. It’s just rubbish. It will effect Rolex as a brand in the long run. Customers move onto better affordable watches.

[@Fb1907kysf]

After purchasing my omega smp , i started to think why i need to have submariner then sold… This smp pushes you to sell submariner. Amazing watch it is. Gmt rolex , sky dweller and smp enough for me. Smp is sub killer

[@cuestion-de-tiempo]

Harrison, I really enjoy these VS matchups, been watching your videos for quite awhile now, well done... My favourite Breguet right now would be the MARINE HORA MUNDI, the dial is just magnificent, and I like the fact taht you can get it in bracelet, rubber or leather for different seasons around the year. Cheers and thanks for the Hat :) As for the two Titans, Omega has always been the better watch, Rolex has always been the better brand in terms of recognition (In other words More marketing). Omega all the way.

[@ChisholmHunterOfficial]

Thank you Sir, appreciate that!

[@paulbmi2976]

After having both I have one on my wrist full time! I’m very hard on my watches and only one brand holds up to me I’ve sent back three Rolexs’ And not one sea master I will say that all suffer from from tuning it doesn’t vary much between the two however I tend to gain or lose 5 minutes a month on the 6 that I have. That said I’m a real fan of Omega they hold up to abuse that I deal out Great channel and I’m an American Campbell Clan boy lol

[@steelsteez6118]

Hey Paul, do you know if it's the 3235 movements with Rolex that you had problems with?

[@chriscline6483]

I have dove with both models using a 5mm gloves and 7mm semidry wetsuit, I find the chunkier bezel on the omega to be a little bit easier underwater. However, my favorite bezel is the Doxa 300T has the integrated no decompression limit. Although I don’t really need that on the bezel since it’s on my Shearwater dive computer, I think it’s a very cool nod to the old days where we had to use no decompression tables.

[@puruthacker9700]

1. Sub is a superior watch (BUT it’s double the price! So idk if it’s a fair comparison) 2. Sub is really hard to get at retail and probably not worth the cost at the gray market price. 3. Omega is better value for money (terrific watch at a lower price) especially if you plan on keeping your watch. 4. If you really want a Rolex Omega will NOT scratch that itch no matter how it’s dressed up.

[@JamesK1963]

Throw away those calipers. Those measurements are wrong. The Submariner lug-to-lug is about 47mm. I have both of those watches. I got the Submariner and the blue dial SMP. I love both, but I like the Submariner better.

[@johnteill_]

If I could just walk into the store and pick from both...and I'm talking about brand new with the box & paperwork....and pay retail....I'd get the rolex....however I live in the real world and I've learned that you pretty much have to go into a back room and let puff daddy play "Diddy games" in your backdoor 😅....I'll take the omega and keep my self respect thank you very much.

[@Lucmercurius]

The Omega dial is perfect, beautiful and stylish, but the rest of the watch I find it hedious. It looks like a 90s vibe that hasn't aged well. The Sub is a classic timeless piece, well proportionate, beautiful all around. If Omega update everything but the dial I think they will have a fabulous watch and I'll buy it in a second.

[@Dr.AlbertoPeña]

I think that the omega is the winner. Don´t get me wrong, the Rolex is fantastic, but If I go for a Rolex I would prefer a GMT master, in regards to divers...... Breitling Superocean 42, the build quality is superb, I own all three. First place Omega and then the Breathing and last the submariner no date. In regards to dial..... the omega all the way the laser etching is superb.

[@dave23q.18]

45mm l2l on Submariner and 13.6mm thickness this is absolute bollocks. The worst measurements ever, completely wrong 🤯 shame 👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼

[@bradfoley8874]

Omega

[@canadianwatchmonkey3992]

Price set aside I would go for the Rolex. It is just such an icon….. If I could only own one watch It would be a Omega Speedmaster professional, simply the best looking watch on earth and the moon :-)

[@jdmoney1000]

Why does everybody feel the need to compare these two watches..... The omega is a great looking, comfortable piece of crap comparitively speaking.... There, I said it!

[@jorad4887]

Omega all the way!

[@micaljimenez7381]

I think both are good watch,the problem is that rolex have a better luxury image,must like mercedes and opel,i am sure opel have very good car with same technology than mercedes,but people turn over in the street or are impressed by the mercedes not by the opel,rolex is a social statue for everybody around the world,they are not better than omega in technology but in marketing,if i can buy a rolex for the price of an omega,in term of image i will probably take the rolex,but if omega were 50% less expensive than rolex k am sure to buy an omega,they have to give more for less if they want more new customer,a new customer could buy an omega if its a real good oportunity for luxury entrh level watche..just my opinion,like both,if a rich follower want to offer me an omega,sure i will be happy

[@juanlaboy1]

Great video. I own the 126610 and bought a RubberB bracelet that fits the glide buckle. Becomes 2 watches, 2 feels.

[@Rodolfoguerra12]

I think the sub it’s an excellent watch and looks amazing, it’s iconic and recognizable, however I do prefer the design of the Seamaster, more modern, cooler dial, and the movement… That movement is hard to beat. Cheers.

[@megane230f1]

omegas have always looked a better watch than rolex, omega just cant and will never challenge rolex as they just dont have any investment value unless you bought a snoopy speed master series 1 limited edition 10 year ago if i was going to buy a watch for best looks it be an omega but for a pension fund it be a rolex

[@Rodolfoguerra12]

@@megane230f1 I agree 100%, for me at this moment of my life I’m more focused on buying things I like and enjoy better than investment watches.

[@ivanharlokin]

It's obviously subjective, but I find it hard to get beyond Omega's HEV, which manages to be ugly, useless, and impractical all in one.

[@josepauloneuparthvieirafer4449]

I have both. I much prefer the Rolex. It is much more classic. The Sub is THE DIVER. Period.

[@davehHH1]

Let's be honest this shouldn't be a comparison. You can't buy a Submariner but I could easily buy an omega. So the Omega has to win as it's impossible to buy a Rolex.

[@super1million11]

I own the omega mainly because I can afford it but honestly if given the option between the two and value being the same I think omega is still the one I’d get. My only regret is choosing the black dial over the white dial.

[@darrenaquilina1403]

The Omega is the better watch hands down.

[@micksumo]

The Rolex wins for me but I own a white dial omega and my entire collection is less than the Rolex. So for me from an all round perspective the omega wins. I'm also a lot more comfortable with wearing my omega than I would a Rolex at 3 times the price.

[@oliverprstholm8716]

I just bought a planet ocean black + 3/4 orange bezel with the black/orange rubber strap, love it. I might want a rolex later, but not as a daily watch, which is why i love my omega so much .

[@AZadeh-nd8vx]

I own both these watches. The Sub does not measure 13.5mm thick, its around 12.5mm. You must have measured it over the cyclops!

[@markcopeman3552]

Everyone judges dove watches against the Rolex as it's history and classic looks set a benchmark. However, getting a new one is a different matter with all the politics . Love my great White Seamaster and almost all Rolex are too small for my tree trunk 8 inch wrists!

[@MrDW72]

Yo. I got thick wrists too....what brands or watches do you stick with?! Shit is hard to find proper fitting watches lol. IWC? Panerie? (Can forget about big Rolex.,,,that will cost you a life's savings lol)

[@alimuzhussain8394]

No clash of the Titans here It’s more like David v Goliath Omega has no brand value 😞

[@denis888red]

Go for a Sea Dweller then Mark. Much easier to get hold of too ;) Alimuz... Omega has no brand value?? You're either out of your mind or more likely, don't know what you're talking about.

[@almac9203]

If you like a big watch and price is no object than the Omega Ultra Deep is the watch. 6000m WR officially and unofficially 7500m WR. That is a serious piece of kit. Probably the best dive watch on the market. She's a big unit so suits a big lad.

[@robcudmore6569]

I have both well the previous submariner, and the seamaster with the white dial and rubber strap love them both

[@TroyCote]

Is the Sub worth 4 times the money?Is the Rolex going to hold 4 x the value? Is the Omega going to hold its value? Questions i would like answers too.😊

[@nealefrancis9094]

I own the world is not enough 300 seamaster and I absolutely love it , rolex has a chav image these days , I’m getting the seamaster acqua terra next like Jamie dornan wore on the boat in 50 shades

[@patrik3450]

Rolex are just brand. The omega is better, oh and you can actually buy it without having to be approved or lick boots as a customer. No thank you.

[@revelationsoundstudio]

Very good review, good communication and video shots. I love both watches, but there are a couple things that make the Omega the better choice for me. 1. The second hand tip on the Submariner is a clear metal which makes it harder to see vs the red tip of the Omega. I can find the tip of the hand faster and can follow it better especially in bright light outside. I also like the color of the red tip as it enhances the watches look 2. The minute hand on the Rolex is a clear metal color again which is harder to see in bright light. The white tip on the Omega makes it easier to see. 3. I like the bezel on the Omega has the markers all the way around while the Rolex stops at 15. It looks odd that the markers on the bezel stop on the Rolex though it does give it a cleaner look. Most sport watches however have the markers all the way around the down which makes it more symmetrical. 4. You can just about buy 2 Omega Seamaster's for the price of one Rolex Submariner. 5. Purchasing a Rolex has a very long waiting period of a year or more while the Omega is available in their stores. 6. I love being able to see the movement on the back of the Omega which you can't do with the Rolex.

[@neighborsgoat]

Ditto!

[@justonemovement]

I bought a sub with date (40mm) in 2016 and then a omega 300 diver in 2021 (silver dial, blue bazel, rubber strap), both are super comfortable and great to wear, however with the non-availability of the former, Omega is a fantastic choice , personally I cannot choose one over the other.....both are just as good....just that Rolex is just not available!

[@joolsthefish9331]

good video.. watch on my wrist this morning is my Omega 300 Seamaster Bronze Gold, my 1980’s Seadweller sits in the safe as while it was worn everyday for years, too obvious now…lovin’ the omega

[@steelsteez6118]

Hi there... What do you mean by "too obvious now"?

[@vascular3988]

Omega most beautiful, modern dial , bigger, better mecanism, 15000 gaus, the stell bracelet is most detail , than Rolex sub, e the best part , is cheaper

[@Vidushaka68]

The text on the omega is less and it’s subtle unlike Rolex bold and more text. Just that along say OMEGA

[@marioflores4733]

Can you please do a video of your omega seamaster vs a Tudor black bay 58? These are the two watches I’m currently wanting to purchase but I’m indecisive. 🤷‍♂️

[@ChisholmHunterOfficial]

We certainly can!! Stay tuned for this one and we will get on it ASAP.

[@marioflores4733]

@@ChisholmHunterOfficial Thanks! Keep up the great work 👍

[@branchclan6112]

Owned a 2019 Omega 300M. Sold it and now own the 2020 Sub No Date. Omega was a really accurate watch. Entirely too big and thick, wave dial became a bit elementary. Helium escape valve wasn’t appealing over time. Everyone has a different opinion, but the Sub is the perfect watch for me. If you have the means, get what you want.

[@graygamingps4503]

I prefer the Seamaster but I'd like a Submariner for my collection, if only I could get my hands on one by not paying 2x retail

[@branchclan6112]

@@graygamingps4503 I was on waiting list for 3 weeks to get my Sub. Give it a try. 👍🏻

[@danrubin7954]

Great video!

[@pleaseenteraname833]

IMO Rolex wins in almost every aspect of this comparison but one - real life wearability. I feel that the brand has now become so synonymous with wealth that wearing a sub daily is likely to put a big target on my back. At least with an Omega you have the freedom to enjoy it on the wrist anywhere, anytime…

[@IbrahimAhmad696]

I have both watches. I LOVE the OMEGA ❤

[@omegaseamaster300m4]

Omega Seamaster diver all Day!

[@PickleEdwardKim]

I have both. The Omega is a better looking and more comfortable watch.

[@RichardFitzwell-n3s]

He likes the Omega date window. Give it a few years, you will want that cyclops

[@lestercaldera3776]

Omega has anti magnetic, anti reflective glass and rubber bands that roles do not possesses