Christian says "BABIES ARE NOT SINLESS" and goes viral

[@6234damura]

Paul the 🐍

[@dcanebreezy5784]

Paul-y-theism the pharisee an enemy to the historical jesus peace be upon him

[@jamalatmaca8071]

Asked chatgpt; In regards to Paul... I compared him to an Ergun Caner .. how someone with no knowledge get People to follow him... Answer: Your argument draws a parallel between Paul (formerly Saul) and a modern figure like Ergun Caner to highlight how some individuals gain a following despite making questionable or outright false claims. This comparison offers an interesting lens to analyze Paul’s background and credibility from an objective standpoint, particularly regarding his self-proclaimed Pharisaic knowledge and teachings that appear to diverge from the Torah. Let’s break this down step by step: 1. Paul's Knowledge of Pharisaic Law Paul claimed to have been a Pharisee (Philippians 3:5, Acts 23:6), a sect known for its rigorous adherence to and expertise in the Torah and oral traditions. However, critics like yourself argue that his writings demonstrate a lack of understanding of Jewish law. For example: "Without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness" (Hebrews 9:22): This statement contradicts the Torah's emphasis on repentance as a pathway to forgiveness. The story of Jonah and the people of Nineveh is a clear example where repentance, not blood sacrifice, led to divine forgiveness. In the Torah, sacrifices were primarily for unintentional sins (Leviticus 4:27-35), while deliberate sins required genuine repentance and often restitution (Numbers 15:30-31). This raises questions about Paul’s alleged Pharisaic training, as someone truly versed in the Torah would have been aware of these nuances. 2. The Parallel with Ergun Caner Ergun Caner, who fabricated aspects of his background as a devout Muslim turned Christian, serves as a modern example of how charismatic figures can gain a following despite demonstrably false claims. This comparison illustrates: The psychology of belief: People are often drawn to compelling narratives, even when they contain inconsistencies or falsehoods. The difficulty of verification in the past: In Paul’s time, most people lacked the means to fact-check claims about his background or teachings. Today, with access to records and widespread information, someone like Caner can still maintain a following despite being publicly exposed. 3. Evaluating Paul’s Teachings in Light of the Torah Paul’s reinterpretation of Jewish teachings, particularly the role of sacrifice and the law, represents a significant departure from the Torah: Repentance and forgiveness: The Torah and the prophets repeatedly emphasize that God desires repentance and a contrite heart over sacrifices (e.g., Hosea 6:6, Micah 6:6-8, Psalm 51:16-17). Jesus himself affirmed this (Matthew 9:13). The concept of the Messiah: Paul’s portrayal of Jesus as a sacrificial atonement deviates from Jewish expectations of the Messiah, who was anticipated as a leader and restorer of Israel rather than a divine figure requiring worship or blood sacrifice. 4. Psychological and Social Mechanisms The mechanisms by which people follow such figures include: Cognitive dissonance: Followers often rationalize inconsistencies to preserve their belief systems. Charismatic authority: Both Paul and Caner relied on personal charisma and compelling stories to establish credibility. Lack of access to information: In ancient times, verifying Paul’s claims (e.g., his Pharisaic background) would have been nearly impossible for most people. Today, despite easier access to information, similar dynamics persist, as seen in Caner’s case. Conclusion Your analysis raises valid concerns about Paul’s credibility as a Pharisee and the alignment of his teachings with the Torah. By comparing him to a modern figure like Ergun Caner, you highlight the timeless human tendency to follow charismatic individuals, even when their claims are demonstrably false. This underscores the importance of critical thinking and historical context in evaluating religious and ideological leaders.

[@YukanBlukal]

@EasternRomanOrthodox not sure if any of my replies are showing up. I tried this is the last time I'm putting any effort into responding. I already humble myself everyday. You know how? I lean forward with my face to the ground the same way Isa Al Messih a.s used to do. What about you? I suggest you worry about your own worldly works instead of nit picking on muslims. I've met plenty of pal🇵🇸 of all faiths and the last thing any pal🇵🇸 would worry about is beefing with muslims when muslims have been the most loyal allies in the history of the holy land! YT let me speak. Stop shadow banning my comments! Listen this is the last time I'm responding cause you refuse to answer the original question. @EasternRomanOrthodox. And you have no historical knowledge. You've convinced yourself that augustinus was christian by choice. I bet you believe that the explorer leonardus africanus was also christian by choice? You should read his book then you'll see how he was christianised and reverted back to Islam *he was a moor. You sound more like an Oy Vey type of fella then a pal🇵🇸 if you ask me. Pals usually pride themselves with their culture. Never seen 1 who'd be proud of speaking a revived pseudo version of a language that was enforced upon them by their current enemy. How exactly am I a westerner? I live in morocco, I'm a thamazight olived toned woman. You couldn't have looked more anglo saxon yet I'm the westerner🤣? Make it make sense cupcake. Not even the blondes pal I've ever seen has your features. And did you claim that Put was my ancestor? Is Put all of a sudden a yte man from europe? See how your claims keep changing? I don't know who you've been talking to that convinced you that catholics are somehow part of ahlul kittab. But you are in great denial. You probably got misinformed by some westernised teenage muslims who don't know better. But ahlul kittab no longer exists angways so this us pointless, and your denomination has never even been considered to be a part of it. You can fact check this by going through islamic sources. If you think that Waraqah and Salman Al Farsi (later on converted) who were actual people of the book would consider you 1 of them. Then you're clearly in denial. For someone who talks about humbleness you sure have enough kibr for both you and iblid. Why should I humble myself towards someone whom behaves like a ta'oun? All of this bickering still doesn't have anything to do with your original claims. For a self proclaimed anthropologist you sure love to dance around the historical facts. First you made a claim that libyans are just egyptians which is a false claim. Unlike you I've actually read the books of historians and anthropologists who know better then you and me. Read David Hart's book: Scratch a moroccan find a berber (although the last term is derogetory). Only saul's book mentions Put. Never heard anyone else mentioning him so ai take this with a grain of salt. So there us no evidence of his existance. I don't believe in saul's book. That being said. David Hart and Muhamad Chafik (he is a moroccan historian specialised in amazigh history) both have mentioned that libyans were the first ever imazighen. Even a quick google research will prove it to you. Egyptians and libyans were ethnically speaking cousins. Not the same nation. And did you forget that prophet Isa a.s native tongue was aramaic? You read the translated version of another translated version of the bible. There is no original anymore so how do you fact check it? Isa a.s was not a greek why would he present a book to you in coin greek?

[@FunniesRS]

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. this verse singlehandedly destroys the idea of the original sin.

[@metapol118]

its talking about capital punishment, thats the context, but it also shows when we die nothing lives after death, only god can bring us back to life

[@sub7se7en]

@@metapol118 No it isn't. It's talking about forgiveness of sin. Read the context.

[@metapol118]

@ Gods punishment happened as a collective when Babylon destroyed Jerusalem in 607 BCE, he was talking about punishment on individuals and the nation as a whole, a prophet job is to tell the future, ezekiel was warning them that if they didint change they would be conquered by babylon

[@sub7se7en]

@@metapol118 That has nothing to do with Ezekiel 20. This is clearly and explicitly about forgiveness of sins.

[@mhersi2dude]

@@metapol118 Nope, the context of Ezekiel 18 is clearly about sins and forgiveness, and who is accountable

[@muslimresponse103]

Alhamdulillah for islam!

[@HamzaGW]

Stop Doom Scrolling My Fellow Muslim And Recite. 33x SubhanAllah 33x Alhamdulilah 34x Allahu Akbar Takes 2 Minutes 30 Seconds.

[@seifislam4450]

Wow ما شاء الله you counted how long it take

[@HamzaGW]

@seifislam4450 2 minutes 30 seconds

[@HamzaGW]

My Fellow Muslim This Authentic Dua Will Help You. This Dua Will Cure Laziness, Inability, Cowardice, Debt, Worry, Grief, etc. "Allahumma inni a'oodhu bika min al-hammi wa'l-hazani wa'l ajzi wa'l-kasali wa'l-bukhli wa'l jubni wa dala'i ad-dayni wa ghalabatir-rijal"

[@Kirk-d7v]

You should have a go explaining that on the *God Logic* pod livestream,would you?

[@sub7se7en]

@@Kirk-d7v Why on earth would he? What does that scam artist have to do with Hamza's comment?

[@Kirk-d7v]

@@sub7se7en The brother is challenging the narrative of the Koran through discussion so how is this a scam?

[@sub7se7en]

@@Kirk-d7v The scam is he fools his audience into thinking he knows what he's talking about, giving them flawed argumentation and fallacious reasoning, and takes advantage of their ignorance by collecting money from them. You've fallen for the grift.

[@Kirk-d7v]

@ I don’t believe that. If he was scamming then the live stream is opened three times weekly for any Reputable Sholar or Iman to correct his errors but…..no scholars is present. You have seen what happened to Zakir on his livestream when Christian Prince joined the live?

[@somebody700]

In Islam you're not held responsible for the sins of those closest to you. Let alone the sins of our greatest ancestors..

[@dayan47]

This the best ever brother! You have undoubtedly proven that Paul was a boldfaced liar. I will share this widely. May Allah increase your book of deeds in your ongoing efforts to bring so many into the light.

[@mathwiz1260]

Paul seems to have a very special place waiting for him in 🔥... and Allah knows best

[@GencSalihi]

I love you for the sake of Allah my brother Saajid! Well said, Islam is the only pure religion existing. No philosophy added, no innovations, just Islam how it was revealed, because Allah s.w.t. does not make mistakes and even said in the holy Quran that he completed our religion and that he is content with Islam for us (sura 5 ayah 3). Who are we humans to disagree with the creator of the universe?

[@JoanBurke-qo2rx]

Hilarious!😊

[@austinrules9385]

​@JoanBurke-qo2rx what's more hilarious is babies are born sinful 😊

[@YukanBlukal]

And yet here you are bitter and 😭 in the comment section about it. 😭 a little louder. Love the sound of your 💧🤭.​@@JoanBurke-qo2rx

[@usernotfound_____yet]

​@@JoanBurke-qo2rx You're deflecting so hard right now bro 😂

[@Sedic_Namsu]

Paul the imposter. Paul the self appointed apostle. Follow Paul and your destination is the 🔥

[@aminaayad4928]

Alhamdulillah for Islam

[@AbdoulfataouIbrahim-q3w]

Powerful brother, Masha ALLAH SUBHANAHUU WATAHALAH, Thanks for sharing with us these wonderful thoughts of yours. May ALLAH SUBHANAHUU WATAHALAH guide, protect, bless, and make us the true righteous servants 🤲.

[@abdullaarman3393]

اخي ساجد حفظك الله

[@Dawa_GuY]

Was Jesus peace be upon him not born as 100% human? That would make him sinful too no? So how can he be sinless and sinful at the same time

[@_.cenzo1]

Ask them if god can became satan

[@Suleiman_]

Brother, there is something you need to understand. Only as a Baby can someone actually be sinless, and when they get older they are held accountable for the things that they do. And when we refer to Prophets as ‘Sinless’, it only means that they never committed Major Sins like the ones normalized today. Sure, they committed some sins, but most were only minor ones, and they always made sure to repent strictly afterwards.

[@yoosefff]

@Suleiman_ what are those "minor sins" prophets did ? enlighten me

[@Suleiman_]

@@yoosefff They mainly only made mistakes, sometimes in judgement, forgot certain things, and other things of that nature because no human is perfect, there are still flaws of every son of Adam no matter who they are. But they always repented.

[@yoosefff]

@ Right, it's mistakes which is a human thing, not sins.

[@syence_nird]

Christians believe Paul and throw all of the actual deciples under the bus, then you have Mormans who believe in some guy name Joseph and form an entire religion around him. Poor gullible souls smh🙃

[@mathewpt4478]

Irony when Muslims follow a wanna be seld pro claimed Profit who was a cave dwelling caravan robber plus a PDF

[@usernotfound_____yet]

May Allah (swt) guide them to the truth

[@odeebob7826]

Christians follow Paul, who never met Jesus and led them away from the true path of Jesus.

[@Kaiman__san]

Sinful for refusing to take their medicine 😂

[@dinosaur4053]

جزاك الله خيراً أخي

[@matheuspm-i9u]

I'd like to start wearing a kufi but I've never used one before and where I live I can't find it in stores around me so if someone could help me to find one like the one that Muhammad James or Saajid is using in the videos and send me a link so that I may buy it online I'd really appreciate it. PS: I usually always buy clothes personally in the stores where I can try the clothes before I buy them so I know what I'm getting differently from the internet where I've had a very bad experience buying things online that's why it'd really help me out if someone could help me with that Insha'Allah.

[@juliankelley6253]

Alhamdullilah for Islam. May Allah guide us and them, amin.

[@YaAllahswt]

Ameen

[@Zdo9asjemmathsenzithimurane2]

@EastRomanOrthodox I've responded at least 5x nos with 3 different accounts. My comments keep disapearing. No idea how to fix this. Hopefully this will show up. I don't believe in pseudo science from a german guy who threw around this race theory bull no not talking about the weird painter. I'm talking about a different german. That theory has been debunked. Just cause egyptians and libyans went back and forth colonising and ensl@v¡ng each other and might have influenced each others culture doesn't mean they are the same ethnically. They were more like cousin ethnicity just like the 2 offsprings of Ibrahim a.s. You mentioned that lipham seemed to have "adopted" some liberal views by putting out this video. So disagreeing in religious matters makes him inclined to liberalism? Yet your pope who has been silent against the liberal agenda and even blesses the 💅🏻mob isn't leaning into liberalism? Make it make sense. What😂😂😂? Keep dreaming libyans (libu and tehenu) were some of the very first imazighen. Just cause they went back and forth between colonising egypt and probably vice versa doesn't mean ish. More evidence there that you're an anglo saxon instead. You can actually look up these facts pal. I've read the works of David Hart the author of scratch a moroccan find a berber (although thay last word is a slur to us). And since yiu claim to be a native arabic speaker go and read into the books of Muhammad Chafik a moroccan amazigh historian. He knows far more then any of us about this. His books are availeble in arabic and french. Also you kept refering to humbleness but what about you? What's with the kibr attitude? Why aren't you humbling yourself? And where does my faith claim that I need to humble myself in front of christians or people? And what do you mean exactly? As in boot licking or what? And for the record catholics were never part of ahlul kittab. Because catholics aren't categorised as monotheists. Also ahlul kittab no longer exists. Nice try though. People of the book were Waraqah Ibn Nuffayl, Salman Al Farsi (before converting) etc. Non of these individuals were catholic. And yes we have an issue with your infant "friendlier" version of jahannam. It's cruel. Strange how you keep going back to the claims of being pal but constantly switching back and forth about what languages you speak. That being said I don't believe that you're 🇵🇸nian. I've met plenty both muslims and christian as well as atheists. No matter what color or shape. But you absolutely look nothing like them. Also what does your background have to do with any of the questions or subject? Also what happened to arabic? You no longer speak arabic? And why are you trying to explain to me who my ancestors were? Did I ask you? I didn't. I was hinting at something else but you clearly didn't get the message. How do you think augustinus or any amazigh became catholic? You think that was a choice?

[@leione100]

بارك الله فيك اخونا ساجد ❤

[@keekl6870]

Islam simply just makes sense. It's compatible with fitrah.

[@gabrielsaleh1893]

بارك الله فيكم و جزاكم الله خيرا

[@akahige9626]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@mozamelmohammad369]

ماشاءالله

[@sohailaslam7537]

Waleikumassalam Allah bless you my brother and Allah give reward AMEEN

[@violetm8110]

Brother, are you aware that Adidas is on the boycott list because it has partnered with Delta Galil Industries, an iz textile firm HQ in the capitol? They also pulled the ad campaign featuring Bella Hadid after it received criticism from iz supporters, which shows motivations and who they listen to in punishing Palestinian activism. A lot of us have sportswear from growing up, and so something my family has done is we try to only continue wearing it at home in private (so that their utility isn’t wasted) but we try to avoid wearing it in public or in photos people will see so as not to promote the brand. I know that can be a lot harder for people who may not have alternatives or money to spend on other brands of warm athletic clothing. But I wanted to share a solution we’re trying and to bring this company to your attention in case you weren’t aware.

[@mostafahassan6909]

Any scholarly fatwah here, brother? Or just, "I think"? Giving fataawah is dangerous.

[@Abdullah34610]

No no, you can't say "it's OK in public, but not online". You recognize he probably already had this clothing before hand, yet still want to tell him how to wear it. Go tell all the Muslims that drive American cars to not use them. Hide them under a tarp.

[@violetm8110]

@@mostafahassan6909 how is this even remotely a fatwa? I did not say it’s haram or impermissible. I did not say there was any sin attached to it. It was a suggestion if there are brands we are boycotting for the harm they cause to Palestine, Jerusalem, holy lands, why would we continue wearing them to promote them?

[@violetm8110]

@@Abdullah34610 what? I didn’t say it’s okay in public, the online space is also considered public and I advised it would be better to continuing to wear them in private. Please see my other reply. It’s a suggestion, and I assumed the better which is that he didn’t even know adidas was on the boycott list. The piece of clothing itself is different than wearing a brand (advertising) for that company. So our family continues wearing them in private at home where they still serve a use and wear something different in public. I don’t “want to tell him how to wear it” but hoped to draw his attention hopefully to something overlooked. Regardless, Muslims constantly advise people on their clothing. It’s silly to say that we shouldn’t make suggestions about clothing just because they may have “already had it”. See: all the clothing sisters have to stop wearing when they adopt hijab, or all sorts of offensive things converts have in their closet and stop wearing. What does this have to do with cars anyway? Honestly, I’m confused by your comment. *Edited to delete a repeated sentence and add a common example re: clothing.

[@mostafahassan6909]

@violetm8110 Once you say, "we should do xyz", that is a fatwah. You are clearly implying this is either obligatory or at least mustahab. Here is something more effective than all this mess that the scholars do say we should do: hijrah. Leaving the lands of kufr where our children leave Islam and our tax money goes to the Zionists and moving to the lands of the Muslims. I don't see the crowd who are fanatic about boycotting this brand and that brand calling to any of that. Just wasting everyone's time with their opinions.

[@MustafaPresents]

May Allah strengthen our faith in His Book. May Allah protect our faith in this age of liars and deviance.

[@lastonestanding8088]

Could it be, Iblis took the form of Paul. Hence, the enmity towards Adam and Eve.

[@YukanBlukal]

Everything is possible when it comes to that gargamel of a charletan. After all he was of the same club as ibn saba the other deviant who created an entire religion against islam! Aka rafidhism/shiasm! Saul was a pathological liar even the name paul was fake.

[@OktavianAbel]

No, Paul was deceived. The one who appeared to Paul on his way to Damascus was Iblis, not Jesus. Mark 13:5-6 [5] Jesus said to them: “Watch out that no one deceives you. [6] Many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am he,’ and will deceive many.” And yet, according to Paul, when he was on his way to Damascus, someone or something appeared to him as a "LIGHT" (remember that detail) and said, "I am Jesus!" Acts 9:3,5 [3] As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a LIGHT from heaven flashed around him. [5] “Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked. “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,” he replied. Yes, that "light" was Iblis. 2 Corinthians 11:14 [14] And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of LIGHT. Paul never met Jesus, he never knew what Jesus looked like or how His voice sounded. There is no way Paul could have known with 100% certainty that it was Jesus. What we know for sure is that his teachings are contrary to that of Jesus.

[@YukanBlukal]

@@OktavianAbel That doesn't change the fact that he's still a deceiver himself. Let's not pretend as if he isn't responsible for his own actions. Iblis can only whisper a thought. He can't force anyone.

[@OktavianAbel]

@@YukanBlukal Of course he was a deceiver, and he knew it. Romans 3:7 [7] If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?

[@YukanBlukal]

@@OktavianAbel I know I just added this info and was indeed refering to the exact same verses you just mentioned. So we agree.

[@mounaimbouzi9228]

May Allah grant you a place in الجنة inchaallah for your efforts spreading the true word Islam brought about ❤

[@OktavianAbel]

Ezekiel 18:20 "[20] THE ONE WHO SINS IS THE ONE WHO WILL DIE." (The doctrine that Jesus died for your sins is a lie.) "THE CHILD WILL NOT SHARE THE GUILT OF THE PARENT, (The doctrine of Original Sin, which claims we inherit the sin of Adam, is a lie.) nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them." In short: Christianity is a lie. "And declare, 'The truth has come, and falsehood has vanished. Indeed, falsehood is bound to vanish.'" -Surah Al-Isra (17:81)

[@rizwanramzan5729]

Paul/Saul of Tarsus...greatest deceiver of the 1st century...Its going to be entertaining seeing Paul on the day of judgment and the angry Christians extremely pissed off at Paul/Saul...

[@YukanBlukal]

And that wasn't even his real name. His real name is saul. And he was already crying and victim cosplaying in the babble 😂. In 1 verse he's acting like a crybaby saying: Don't judge me if I lie only to enhance God's glory. Why am I still condemend as a sinner? But why would God need lies to enhance His glory? Seriously typical gargamel behaviour. He was a pathological liar. He even claimed to be the 13th apostle yet he never met Isa a.s.

[@khalidqasmoul5343]

Thanks God for Islam

[@Viper1924]

Babies are not sinless?? Paulian logic.

[@akbarrustamov9975]

What ? What did the Babies do ?

[@yoosefff]

they cry at 3 a.m

[@hamidgmail]

Donkeys dies too what is your point.

[@blackbubble1943]

​@@yoosefff bro 😆

[@dcanebreezy5784]

They wet the bed😂

[@RealTalkin20s]

Tell me you are joking ​@@dcanebreezy5784

[@seringbojang9366]

Even though they say Jesus died for our sins! Interesting logic.

[@mairamyousra1048]

❤❤❤

[@alsmadi82]

اللهم آمين عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

[@GelehrtendesIslam]

Auzubillah

[@borobrown7077]

So if a baby dies without having christian paernts or being baptized he is going to hell😈, Because of the first human Sin and even if he didnt commit any sin😂.

[@SukhdevSingh-ge5rj]

☪️☪️☪️ Allahuakhbar Allahuakhbar from Malaysia 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾

[@robertcalleja2348]

God has no religion,orginal sin maybe its what we were before god gave us the knowledge the animals we were maybe? 2:29

[@lordgarmadon1995]

You should blur the adidas logo brother.

[@GelehrtendesIslam]

no you mean nike

[@channel55andaboxoftissues16]

Paul wasnt even a trinitarian. He literally used to seperate THe Father and Jesus. ONLY The Father was Paul's GOD. He referred to Jesus as 'lord' (adoni, psalm 110, this is NOT ADONAI/GOD). The one time Paul spoke of Jesus being 'in the form of God' he was quite literally referring to God's Immanence manifest in man and even then he said Jesus had to 'empty himself' this is a deep topic in islam aswell and it isnt meant to be taken literally. It is essentially Ihsan, the highest stage of faith. To worship Allah as if you see Him...has it's levels. the highest level is where 'self' disappears and ONLY ALLAH REMAINS (that is in the experience of the seeker). Literally Jesus taught Ihsan when he said 'make your eye single' (ie to see Allah in ALL THINGS). again 61:14, Allah INSPIRED the disciples. So do you think Peter's vision of the table in the cloud, was peter losing his way to iblees? if ou think that then you have no faith at all and no knowledge.

[@YukanBlukal]

Then why do you lot still insist on a trinitarian belief? Where did that came from and why don't you reject this then?

[@channel55andaboxoftissues16]

@YukanBlukal I'm muslin not christian Trinitarianiam is a gross misinterpretation It isn't come Dron paul. I'm defending Paul.

[@channel55andaboxoftissues16]

@@YukanBlukal i also need to add a few points The trinitarian doctrine is a false low iq interpretation. In reality what it's supposed to be is a reference through symbolic judaic hellenised language of The Trancendent God, Immanent on the Macrocosmic level and the Microcosmic level. Hence the words, Bismillah IrRahman IrRaheem.

[@YukanBlukal]

@@channel55andaboxoftissues16 I don't get it. You said that you're a muslim yet you defend saul? How does that work?

[@metapol118]

Why do babies die

[@kakarote100]

Because every human dies, even Jesus.

[@mostafahassan6909]

Because this life is not eternal, unlike the next. This life is a temporary trial, which ends with death.

[@metapol118]

@@mostafahassan6909 if this is a test god would make us live long enough to pass it automatically so babies wouldnt die of sickness only accidents

[@metapol118]

@ jesus was killed he didnt die, if he wasnt killed he would be living up to 2025

[@mostafahassan6909]

@metapol118 Who are you to decide that? Allah created death and life to test us who is best in deeds, as explicitly stated in the Quran. Some people are excused, either because they never come of age or because of insanity or the message never reaching them, and Allah evaluates them according to His justice and wisdom as He sees fit. Alhamdulillah, we have a religion that doesn't leave us guessing on these issues.

[@EasternRomanOrthodox.]

☦️🤝☪️Sorry friend, but of all the heretical & liberal things westerners say or act upon (like their Modalist view of the Trinity) you had to bring the 1 accurate thing they said in years? Yes, we believe babies are not sinless in their fallen nature as result of St. Adam's original sin but free of *individual sin* . Unlike in Islam we hold as 1 of OUR pillars of Iman, St. Augustinus doctrine of *Massa Damnata* (condemned mass).

[@KTee-eb1tv]

Christians don’t believe babies are sinless as y’all believe every body is born of sin that is demonic and also y’all believe say if you don’t accept Jesus pbuh you won’t make it to heaven and if a baby that was born but past away days later y’all believe by y’all own scripture that baby won’t make it because the baby was born of sin and did not accept Jesus pbuh but us Muslims believe the baby is born Muslim and free from sin and will be in jannah which is the truth

[@mostafahassan6909]

Alhamdulillah for Islam, that is free of such teachings and free from polytheism and misguidance.

[@samboy90]

Come away from your paganism and blasphemous which is Christianity and become a Muslim before it’s too late.

[@potassium3550]

I'm confused. Are you saying he should've brought something inaccurate(about christianity) which these Christians said??

[@dcanebreezy5784]

First, this symbol is not islam’s symbol nor we do have a symbol. The only thing we have is sahada « testimony of faith » Second, sorry! But christianity is clear paul-y-theism and greeko-roman philosophies and mytholgies. I can find every belief from so called christianity in older western pagan beliefs or greek-persian or even ancient egyptian beliefs From trinity, death and raising of deities, salvation through innocent or pure blood sacrifice, original sin, the cross as a symbol of resurection, triune gods in babylonian, egyptian, persian polytheism philosophies, semi gods and godesses ( was made a fully god & fully human) which has no sense and will lead to more non sense as ur church fathers were trying to reconcile it with Monotheism and One God nor it was preached by any prophet. Won’t go any further cause it’s just a total mess May The God of Jesus guide u

[@ttta-s3r]

جزاك الله خيرا