The 10 Sharpest Lenses I've Ever Tested 2015 (for Canon cameras)

[@azona1979]

Yeah Bro. It's true. You have put a lot of effort helping us all. If ever you feel discouraged by someone here in a negative post, please ignore them if they wont accept help. The major work you have posted here speaks for themselves! Basically all my lens and even Camera body that I have any questions on I come here to seek your advice. I am found now with Canon 70D, Canon Lens from 40mm, 10-18mm STM, 18-135mm STM. I travel to Yosemite National Park in California from time to time and I have to say, at times I am not enjoying the scenery because of the videos and pictures I work on to show family and friends. So I again I understand the countless hours you spent here to help us all with the right equipment to buy and save on things we could have wasted Time/Money/Effort. Thanks again Chris!

[@christopherfrost]

+Thiago De Almeida Thanks :-)

[@TylerNBPianist]

I'm not going to lie either. You're channel is going to be my #1 Go-To Resource when I am looking into lenses for my Canon T3 Rebel. I'm still a beginner, but after watching your reviews I get a better idea of what lenses I might want to eye for the future. You also helped me immensely with your reviews of the Canon kit lenses which came with my camera. I understand them and f/stop correlation with sharpness a lot better now. Needless to say, I have a lot to learn, but you definitely have my subscription and I look forward to learning more from your future videos.

[@manishbhoola]

I echo this sentiment too and let me say in a lighter way that Chris here has been the number one guy for spoiling me and spending the $$$$ I've invested so far in this fantastic hobby. :)

[@pappupappu3084]

A big liar.

[@DTMtarik]

"mortal human beings can afford" lol good one!

[@YourTechGuide.]

thank you for the review Mr. Frost. I always look forward to your videos. by far the best reviewer when it comes to camera lenses. thanks again my friend.

[@ivankjt]

Chris, I just want to give you props for your channel. I'll be honest here, I only subscribed to your channel for less than a month after researching photography and lenses. But, it's a very good feeling for me when I discover a quality channel like yours. Detailed and interesting videos which aren't too long, articulate, calm, and soothing commentary; finding your channel just feels like I'm getting invited into someone's cozy home, haha! Keep up the good work, I look forward to more of your videos.

[@apo1980]

Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS is a great sharp Lens

[@afsfitness2010]

Mr Frost I just want to say that I truly appreciate the time and effort you put into putting together these very informative video. Your channel has been extremely helpful to me and getting my photography game into more serious territory. Thank you very much.

[@gurudeclan]

My favorite lens of all time, for its combination of value, sharpness, usefulness, weight, build, etc, etc, etc: . .. . Canon 35mm F2 IS

[@edwaggonersr.7446]

Chris, you provide an invaluable service, especially to those of us who are fairly new to photography. Thanks.

[@sebpica6032]

Ed Waggoner Sr. I agree with you I am a beginner myself there's so many lenses that it's nice to get some information like this video

[@ionv8573]

40 mm STM, for me, it is like magic, without IS, but razor sharp wide open, and very cheap ideed.

[@Bevieevans8]

Thank you Chris for taking the time to put this video together; very useful

[@BlueSkyPhotography]

Great video Chris . Thanks for doing it. God bless.

wow the video I was waiting for! I thought samyang 135 would have been the first XD

[@Gandalf_The_Jacked]

Any other semi popular photography channel on youtube would be flooded with insults and "YOURE STUPID AND WRONG" Here though, at least so far, not one offensive insulting comment and 100% like ratio and lots of reasonable discussion. Love it. I guess thats the benefits of having a decent size, but not too big audience.

[@biolinkstudios]

Fuck off mate

[@slabbyrider8665]

@@biolinkstudios ha ha!!

[@GinAmber]

I'm planning to get Sigma 30mm 1.4 is it big difference from Sigma 50mm 1.4?

[@christopherfrost]

+Gin Amber It's certainly a lot wider, and not as good optically. Watch my reviews for all the info you need :-)

[@BrianBerneker]

Not sure if vintage glass qualifies here, but I've found stellar results with the Pentax Super Takumar f1.4 50mm You should check one out some time!

[@richarddouglas6838]

+Brian Berneker i have a pentax 50 mm 1,7 smc (automatic) 35 years old and beleive me, its my best lens, most sharper and brigther than any other lens I have, even the digital ones. Shooting in evening or inside , the best results is with this marvelous lens,,,,, sorry they dont make like these today.

[@gitithadani]

+Brian Berneker I love the lens - have the smc version as well and the 55/1.8. The yashinon 50/1.4 is also sharp - another legacy lens is R hexanon 55/1.4 and slightly closing the iris the sharpness can be stellar

[@yoramse]

One of the best comprehensive videos I saw and I have seen many. Not Litigious, very professional and thinking about the common photographer with his budget limited while looking for the best sharp images. Thank you very much for your review, a real candy

[@UlricWolf]

Can You try out please new Tamron 35mm f1.8 VC lens and maybe compare it to Sigma 35mm art? :) It would be very nice test and comparison, I'm waiting more info about that lens before buying. P.S - it's shame that Samyang 135mm has no AF :(

[@guitarist6494]

I love your videos man, there so helpful and informative, i learn so much from them Also you have a nice sounding voice (no homo)

[@TechMeNowTV]

I have the Sigma 30mm F1.4 Art Lens and I think it is dope

[@ArthurLevonyanEarthman]

Tobias Dahlberg especially for its price. I bought for 280$, a little bit used but in mint condition and it gorgeous. I’m using it with canon 650D and photos are Bokehlious 😄

[@emmanuelhernandez603]

Nice video, the music, your soothing voice and the info was great.

[@zijunryanmeng3921]

i like it when you say mortal humanbeing

[@couchgaming5577]

Great video Chris. I was lucky enough to get a 50D, 16-35 2.8, Speedlite 580EX II, and the 85mm 1.2 for $375! I’m still not believing it. Lol

[@wanneske1969]

What about the Canon 70-200 mm f2.8 IS II ? I think it's a lot sharper than version 1 which I also owned

[@christopherfrost]

I haven't tested it. I'm sure it is, though

[@Teeb2023]

Given the amount of kit you've had / tested, this is a huge omission. You owe it to yourself to own this lens. It's the sharpest, fastest, most versatile sub-£2000 lens available.

[@christopherfrost]

I know it's amazing: I can't afford it!

[@Teeb2023]

Christopher Frost Photography It's nearly Christmas... pester the family into organising a kitty. :D

[@JeremyGalloway]

I think he probably left that one out because the 200mm f/2.8 USM was slightly sharper!

[@FabioSub75]

Very good review Christopher!!! Thumb up for you!!!

[@jacquelinephan4791]

Canon 24-70 f4 vs canon 24-105 f4 which one do you recommended for all in one? Landscape + portrait?

[@PrinceMascara]

canon 24-105 f4 is a better choice because of the added focal length, But it is not great with landscape. Because it is not that wide. 24mm is not wide enough for landscape.

[@bentoms-lucy295]

I have used both canon 24-70f4 is better and sharper

[@wiktoriaheinz9244]

Hi Chris. I'm a great fan of yours and your camera testing for more ordinary people. Just wanted to say that. Keep ut the good work.

[@calaverasgrande]

Other reviewers have found the Canon 85 1.8 to be sharper than the 1.4. So you essentially pay about a $1000 for one more stop.

[@TalesOfWar]

+calaverasgrande You're also paying for higher build quality.

[@brettmann2922]

You mean the Canon 85 1.2, not 1.4. The difference between 1.2 and 1.4 is 2/3 of a stop itself. You pay for the amazing bokeh on that lens though, more than you pay for the extra light. It has a magical quality to it. That being said it is so expensive and has so much heavy glass a lot of times I use my Rokinon 85 1.4 instead for fear of breaking the canon 😂

[@TalesOfWar]

Brett Mann I wish Sigma would hurry up with their 85mm Art. If it's as good as their 35 and 50 Art lenses it'll be an instant buy for many, including myself.

[@brettmann2922]

+TalesOfWar I don't think I could justify buying a third 85mm but I'm sure I could talk myself into it somehow 😜

[@smokey267]

+TalesOfWar the current sigma 85mm is actually sharper than all the current canon versions

[@pankajmistry4600]

Excellent review as always. I agree Canons L series lenses can be prohibitive in their astronomical price - especially when newly released. I shall now look at the other brands you suggested. Thanks mate

[@renagadetechtog655]

The Sigma 17-50 ex OS hsm!? For the money its a beauty

[@alexanderzimek120]

Hey Chris, I deeply enjoy your reviews. Take care and best wishes.

[@HectorSuzy]

Speaking of sharp 50,s. You should do the Samtang 50 1.2 for aps-c mirrorless! Didn't you have an M3? :)

[@christopherfrost]

I should be taking a look at that quite soon

[@HectorSuzy]

Yaay! :)

[@Alright_Dave]

just subscribed you are one of the best reviewers on KZbin you really go into a full depth review with test shots absolutely outstanding mate well done big things up 👍👍

[@younisalaa]

i think the 100mm 2.8L IS should be on this list.. it's almost too sharp!

[@HMatthewHowarth]

+Alaa Younis +1 to that - shooting at f/3.2 for classic headshots I've had numerous subject complain about its ability to resolve their fine lines and blemishes.

[@Oliverkavanagh2108]

+H Matthew Howarth photoshop......

[@HMatthewHowarth]

+JKOK Gaming No kidding! Shooting tethered, reviewing shots, etc. there's clearly a first phase when people need reassuring. It's easy to fix, and a very nice problem to have.

[@SpeckyNation]

+tyvek05 hahaahahhaha, noob

[@TalesOfWar]

+tyvek05 May as well say developing kills photography. Same thing if you're dodging and burning. Even the concentration of the chemicals will change the final exposure etc.

[@davidadelaide]

Thanks for putting this video together. I'm an amateur and didn't know there was so many differences between lenses. So now I am more aware when I buy a lens next time. Thanks again.

[@ganzonomy]

I would have added the 100mm f/2.8 L IS USM Macro lens. It's terrifying

[@annicerory]

It is a great lens. worth every penny

[@minstryl]

I think I've seen this video more than a couple of times now and I've **JUST** got the WatchMojo reference. This video is a gift that just keeps on giving :)

[@linusfotograf]

I just ordered your number one lens there.

[@bogdanovicdavid]

Linus Wärn good for you

[@AdvaitThakur]

Its very good, that you considered both quality and price of the lens. Also, I can imagine how hard it must be to choose the sharpest 10 out of so many lenses. Great work !

[@rangey7096]

I wish I have a good lense....I have a 18-55 :(

[@Eric-ue5mm]

Save up for 1 Sharp 50mm. Its very versatile, you just have to move some!

[@aantonic]

actually i found out Canon 18-55 lense to be pretty good and sharp, i mean newest versions with IS. Its kit lense but i think there is nothing wrong with it,

[@Matthew-ej3pg]

at least you have a camera. ive been saving up for a t3i for a while and still don't have the money for one.

[@flickerhorror3058]

I have a lot of money. I just don't know which lense to get.

[@PeterKKraus]

Hammy Orange It's spelled lens

[@nevillegrowcott1824]

Great and a very informative clip. Precise and clear. Thanks Chris from New Zealand

[@MakeUpJunkie2285]

I agree, sigma makes some good glass!

[@gojoe36]

By some Canon L lenses and then talk to me. They don't compare on a canon body. I have several Sigma lenses and several top line Canon L series lenses.....you must not, otherwise you wouldn't say what you said.

[@RyuPatterson]

+Go Joe shut the fuck up lmao

[@enterBeastmode1]

Well, I have several L lenses, so let's talk. I have both the Sigma 35 and 50 1.4 art, and they definitely are sharper than their Canon counterparts. They do have flaws, for instance, the matt finish looks good but isn't a wise choice because scratches will be more visible. And since they are third-party lenses, the AF needs to be callibrated with the USB Dock. I am a straight-up Canon user, but you sound like an ignorant fanboy. Another personal experience, the Tamron 24-70 is sharper than the Canon 24-70L (mark1). Tamron 70-200 2.8 is pretty even with the Canon m2, and has even less chromatic abberation. The focal length isnt "real" like the Canon though, it's shorter than 200mm at 200, making the Canon's bokeh smoother. Nobody's saying that you are wrong about the Canon's lineup. But it's obvious that you absolutely have no interest in other options. If you blindly think that Canon lenses are the best for Canon, then you are the one who shouldn't be talking here.

[@ygtx44]

Chris you have Really good content and Reviews 👍❤️ i was happy when i saw that the lens i ordered Canon 70-200 f4L is usm was on the list 😀❤️ have a great day god bless you!

[@HassanETECH]

one of the best reviews i've seen. well done, and great channel 👍

[@guimz_audio]

As always, great and professional review. Packed with helpful informations ! thank you !

[@fraghetti]

now this is a video i urgently needed. perfect for people who are not totally familiar yet with the lenses on the market to show that not always the most expensive lens is the best. thanks a lot.

[@markharris5771]

I'm proud to say I own three in the list, including number 1, and 1 honourable mention. I'm a little surprised you didn't mention the Tamron 24-70 as it's easily my sharpest zoom lens and I bought it because of your review. I also bought the Sigma 20mm and the Samyang 14mm following your reviews, not that I've gone out and bought all lenses you have liked, but when buying a lens I look at your reviews before I make the purchase. Another lens I'm surprised wasn't mentioned is the Canon f2.8 macro which is a great lens both as a macro and as a portrait lens.

[@paulpontillo742]

Mark Harris I'm looking to get the 24-70 f2.8 from Tamron next week I was just wondering how you liked it? I shoot a lot of weddings and I love how versatile and sharp people say it is. but there were some reviews that had me thinking. some say it's very soft.. and some say it had problems with connecting to the Canon camera

[@markharris5771]

paul pontillo I love it, it's as sharp as any other lens I've ever used and I honestly have no idea why anyone would say it's soft. The only drawback, and I'm not sure if this will affect you much, is the massive diameter and getting filters to fit. I wouldn't recommend a lens unless I was absolutely confident in it as they cost too much for that. I love this lens for both digital and film and it's my first choice for grainier film because of its sharpness.

[@paulpontillo742]

Mark Harris awesome thanks!

[@annicerory]

I love the Canon 100mm 2.8L lens too. It is great

[@latincoder]

Have you tested rokinon/samyang 10mm for APS-C cameras? :) Great videos! Regards

[@christopherfrost]

I'm keeping an eye out for one to review

[@latincoder]

awesome! let´s hope that it is possible. cheers

[@jeanpierreguaron9222]

LOL - Cris, I only have 5 lenses - the kit lens that came with my half frame, two Zeiss lenses that you say you're excluding from your list for sensible reasons (the target audience for your list isn't the target market for those two lenses), and the other two are both on your list of 10 lenses. Which is quite surprising, taking into account that I use Nikon, and you're really addressing the "top 10" as a Canon user. But perhaps not so surprising, looking at them. The two we both regard as worthy entrants in the list of 10 are Sigma's two Art prime lenses - the 35 and the 50. VERY good lenses, and very affordable when compared with other lenses of the same quality.

[@miamidolphinsfan]

Excellent list and Christopher your # 1 is already on my Amazon Wish List. I am saving to buy it for my next birthday in June :). God bless you brother and may His grace fill you this weekend.

[@GabrieleCripezzi]

compliment for the video. really. I value sharpness over anything else and this video is absolute marvel as in simple, fast, clear, exhaustive... excellent. subscribed

[@carson294]

Very nice. Thank you for taking the time to do the test for us.

[@teullet1]

This was actually a very awesome video.... Yep I watch all your videos.... Very good job

[@kevinalexopoulos3238]

Hi Chris hope you have a lovely Easter, Can you tell me if the older lenses like Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS or Sigma 24-70mm IF EX DG are still ok to use and have the resolving power the Canon 90D needs. Or is it best I purchase the newer models like Tamron 24-70mm G2 / Sigma 24-70mm ART. Many Thanks

[@CloverStarz]

i love your video better then most other on youtube, your straight on point, very informing.

[@eyesonyouphotography2608]

Once again GREAT job Chris! I truly value your opinions. I'd like to see you do the same type of video with mirrorless mount (M4/3) lenses.

[@haythamfpv]

What would you choose for a full frame, the canon aps-c 55-250 is or the Tamron 70-300 vc 4-5.6? Would the 55-250 work at some focal length or would it be covering only part of the frame all the time?

[@kiranreborn5875]

i never seen such a great informative video ever... specially for lenses ..thanx👌👍

[@hax3r1]

Thank you for making quality videos,keep up the good work! ☺

[@bbmatthews2002]

Thanks Chris for this detailed review! I just un-boxed my shiny Canon 80D two days ago and have a random collection of lenses from my 400D (US name - Rebel xTi). Your synopsis will make me much poorer in days to come, but helps me matrix my next purchase (probably a mid-focal-length, high aperture all-around lens) against cost and features. Excellent review! Thank you.

[@amarjeetdikkant]

Excellent list ! I always admire your work and the way you present things are very professional and informative. Keep up the good job that you are doing !!!! Very informative and i am happy that most of the lenses on the list are from Samyang ..i am a big fan of their lenses.....

[@darinwynder7207]

Having used several of the art lenses and owning one of them i was glad to seem to test why by someone shooting at a pro level. I was also pleased to see you address the Samyang lens having just look at one today at my local shop. At the price it seems a solid value and for your #1 lens solidifies for me my intention to purchase one. Well done. I would like to see you do something similar with a lens list for video shooting on dslr's.

[@richmck007]

Wales is indeed a beautiful country. You make even more so, with your tests! A happy new year 2017 of more testing.

[@CmanVlogga]

This is my goto video when I'm trying to decide what to buy next! Thanks for having the best reviews, EVER!!

[@RanjiRamesh]

Super helpful. Haven't found a better review on youtube! Exactly what I was looking for : D

[@Sama3L]

Nice to hear that the 55-250 IS STM made it to honourable mentions. I love this Lens. For it's price its amazing.

[@tramayneyoung297]

Thanks for the video. You didn't have to put your views and opinions out there for people to blast. But, thank you for providing a decent video and shedding some light on some optical options. I don't have any suggestions as far as lenses are concerned. I think you covered the base for the most part.

[@medunkt]

I'm about to get your number 1 lens. Thank you for your thoughtful, informative and not-too-technical reviews. Just right for me. Best wishes from Aus.

[@christopherfrost]

You won't regret it :-)

[@avarmadillo]

Christopher, lovely presentation and some great lenses to consider. I shoot video almost entirely and own the Sigma 1.8 zoom. It is fantastic, but I also have some Rokinon cinema lenses that yield a wonderful image. I understand Samyang and Rokinon produce the same product. I must say I've not looked into the wider angle lenses from Samyang---mainly because I don't do much of that type of shooting, but your commentary make them a point of interest for me. Thanks again for all your kindness. God bless you!

[@richmck007]

As per usual, you leave us wanting more...more reviews of lenses... I was dieing to get to number one on your list as it was such a good video, if you get my meaning. However, the pictures you have taken, are they pre-lightroom or post lightroom development? I ask, as the clarity of some of your photos are incredible! Many thanks for yet another fine video.

[@christopherfrost]

+rich Mck The pictures I've taken have been edited just to tweak their colours and contrast etc. :-)

[@stefantotev]

Great video and I mostly agree with the choice of lenses. I don't have any experience with Samyang so I can't comment on them, but it was interesting to see them so high in the list. The most critical con of them is the lack of autofocus and IMO for a portrait lens, this is a must. I'd personally list the Canon 16-35 f4IS which is the sharpest and most affordable wide zoom available. I'd also swap the 85 1.2L II with the 70-200 2.8 IS II. They are relatively the same price and if one has to choose, I'd say 9 out of 10 will go with the zoom, which is rightfully called 'a bag of primes'. It's biggest con is the size and weight. The 85 is also quite heavy, but a lot smaller and can go in almost any bag. Sigma's Art line absolutely RULEZ, so when they release an 85 and 135, I believe the list with top 10 affordable sharpest lenses will change quite radically.

[@karikaru]

I have the 14mm f2.8 except branded as Rokinon. Great lens for the value - I used to use in on my crop sensor, but now on a full frame, I notice more the vignetting and distortion. Thankfully, lightroom has a profile now for the Samyang 14 f/2.8 that corrects this very well. I will just say that I haven't been too pleased with the build quality. One of the outer rings on the lens came loose which makes it more difficult to see what f-stop I'm at. Also worth mentioning that it has a fixed lens hood so that to get an ND filter on there, you need to buy a really expensive (almost as much as the lens) ND filter mount custom made for it.

[@natiphotoshop]

hi and thank you very much! what about the canon 100 mm f2.8 macro? Is it considered a very sharp? And whether the new version is much more sharply from?

[@elverdaderoevangeliodejesu8070]

hi Chris, have you ever compared the Canon 50mm 1.8 STM vs Sigma 50mm 1.4? which one do you thing is much better for a Canon 70D?. thanks

[@christopherfrost]

Take a look at my 50mm lens comparison video :-)

[@RichardThorneanorak]

Thanks for your reply, Christopher. Since I wrote that I saw just how many up to date lenses you have reviewed. I enjoyed the above video and can also point people to your review of the characterful small 'Industar' lens. There are other photographers who review legacy lenses online. My advice to people is to always inspect rear and front lens photos closely, whilst cosmetic condition is great if the seller fails to mention optical condition, avoid. Pay the going rate too. Minolta and MD mount lenses are good value as are Praktica Bayonet because they aren't trading any more. Condition is everything though, seek a loyalty lens that states it has no fungal, scratch or aperture issues. There are as many good ones out there as duds.

[@namo80]

Great test Christopher :) About the hidden gems.. You should really try out the old Pentax - Super Takumar. 50mm/f1.4 for example.. Looking forward if you get those. Take care and good luck in the future.. BR.

[@steviesteve750]

Great review. Would be interesting to see where you place the popular zooms like the 17-40 (or newer 16-35) and the workhorse 24-105? Unsurprisingly, the sharpest are mostly primes, so how does the cheapo nifty fifty compare?

[@knorke3642]

I don´t know if you´ve tested the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, but the copy I own is fantastically sharp for a standart zoom lens for an APSC sized sensor camera, and I love it to bits.

[@jameslarsen9814]

Has someone done a review on the Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art vs the Tamron 35mm f1.8 VC? The VC on the Tamron intrigues me, as I do a lot of handheld shooting, but the CA is not as controlled as I wish, which is making me think Sigma...what are your thoughts?

[@npmeilleur]

Hi Christopher, have you ever tested or compared the Zeiss Milvus lineup for Canon? I've got the 25mm 1.4, 35 f2, 50 1.4 and 85 1.4 and really like them (primarily for video). Would love to know your input on how they perform in your tests.

[@Lautaro_Guindulain]

I really appreciate all your videos. God Bless you for taking the time to share with your audience your experience and knowledge. I have a question I hope you can help me with. I just bought the Canon 6D (finally jumped from a 7D to a full frame). I'm planning a trip this summer to Iceland and then Russia. In Iceland my plan is to focus on landscape (I'll be also buying Lee filters), and for Russia, there will be several interior photography i.e. churches, museums, etc. What lense do you recommend in my case? should i buy two separate lenses? thanks!

[@christopherfrost]

+antananarivo201 The Canon 24-105mm f/4 IS USM is a nice option :-) all the best!

[@HorseRadish138]

Hi Chris do you plan to review the Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS lens over the next few months?

[@christopherfrost]

+Horse Radish Not in the next few months

[@jacoriat]

Thanks a lot! have you try the tamron 70-200 2.8? I love its sharpness!

[@gunlokman]

An extremely helpful and well put together offering. Thank you for taking the time and trouble to help us all out there . . . here . . . you know what I mean.

[@ChristopherAndreou]

Great roundup, thanks Chris!

[@tonizuz]

Hi Christopher, I started panning photography since know I'm using the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM on my 550D, some times I'll get darker images and whenI increase iso I'll get noise in my images . What other lens will you suggest ? Thanks and keep it up with you useful videos.

[@christopherfrost]

+tonizuz Try a fast standard zoom lens - take a look at my comparison video

[@tonizuz]

+Christopher Frost Photography Thanks a lot ! Really like you videos they are interesting.

[@starskullyrulz2421]

Hello, I am looking to buy my first dslr soon along with a lens however I'm not sure what lens to buy. I do a lot of landscape and nature photography, so what can you suggest would be the best lens I can buy? I want to buy the canon 70d (if that helps) thank you

[@smaakjeks]

I'm not surprised that Sigma featured heavily on this list. Well done! A lens to check out (that I've mentioned before): Sigma 180mm APO Macro f2.8 OS. Soft at 2.8, but crystal clear at f4 and beyond.

[@cbdougla]

Nice roundup. Thanks for posting. I don't shoot Canon but I am always interested in seeing what other people shoot and I really like the Sigma and Samyang lenses myself (and I certainly respect Canon glass). Subscribed. My sharpest lens is probably my Pentax FA 77 f1.8 Limited. I don't know that it competes with the art lenses but I really like it.

[@leehaze1]

Interesting 100mm f/2 I haven't tried that one. I figured the 100mm f/2.8l macro would be on the list, why not?. I might have to try the 135mm f/2 rokinon as well. Love canon version but don't own it anymore. I knew the sigma 35mm f/1.4 would be on there. The focus rollers in mine broke after 6 months use and had to be replaced under warranty. Keep up the good vids.

[@christopherfrost]

+leehaze1 Everyone asks me that. The 100mm f/2.8 macro is fantastic but it needs to be stopped down to f/4 for best results

[@teashirt]

Shows how much I value your reviews. I own more than half of the list. Partly due to your reviews. Thank you. You have reviewed Canon 15-85 APS-C and that is sharp lens. However it is particularly nice to have a fast lens that is sharp.

[@Slashart666]

Love the 50mm Art, purchased it last year and now looking at getting the Sigma 24-105 to replace my "kit" lens? your thoughts?

[@christopherfrost]

It's a v nice lens. Take a look at my review of it :-)

[@Slashart666]

Yes,have already ,cheers..But should it better to stay with a Canon lens? My kit lens is the 24-105stm. The series 2 24-105 Canon is out now but twice the price.Am i still better off with the Sigma? Love ya vids,cheers for the reply

[@christopherfrost]

I would go with the Sigma lens myself. Check out my review of it

[@sam1741]

hi Christopher, how you think about the canon 100/2.8 macro usm lens? I have own very limited lens in my collection, but to me the 100/2.8 macro is the sharpest among all that i own

[@leojonkers3181]

Not surprised with the number 1, the Sigma 50 mm art. I own it myself. It is nice that you keep in mind that most photographers are just ordinary people where the price is important. And show that there are good alternatives for the expensive Canon (L) lenses.

[@karinroh]

I love Canon lenses, but I use them on a Sony a7R II camera. Chris, I know you are a Canon shooter; I used to be too. Two older Canon non-IS prime lenses I really love for wildlife and sports are the Canon EF-S 300mm f/2.8, which I own, and the Canon 400 mm f/2.8, which I have rented.The difference in price is 4 to 5 times lower respectively, due to the lack of image stabilization. With the Sony A7R II body and Metabones IV adapter every Canon lens I use is stabilized. When compared to shooting on a 5D Mk III with the newer stabilized lens versions, these non-IS lenses appear to actually preform better in sharpness. This may be due to the higher resolution sensor of the Sony.

[@elverdaderoevangeliodejesu8070]

hi there which lens would you recommend me for star photography, widest focal length posible. thanks

[@elverdaderoevangeliodejesu8070]

forgot to let you know that I got a crop sensor Canon 70D....

[@christopherfrost]

The Samyang 16mm f/2 or Tokina 14-20mm f/2 should both be good (although I haven't tested the Tokina lens yet)

[@thegrowthculture]

Nice review Chris! We have 8mm Samyang and we are happy with it too. Will definitely check the Sigma ones!

[@cglasadventure8473]

hello chris why canon 70d when i zoom the video of 3x the lens canon 55-250mm stm is disable the auto focus? and when not zoom 3x if u zoom 250mm the focus will.always hunt

[@christopherfrost]

That's just the way it is, I'm afraid: the dual pixel AF system doesn't work properly in zoom mode

[@cglasadventure8473]

ah..how about the sigma 18-300 and tamron 16-300 ..which is sharper for video of birds for wild life.. which to you recommend and i saw your review already ..all around lenses...

[@cglasadventure8473]

ah..how about the sigma 18-300 and tamron 16-300 ..which is sharper for video of birds for wild life.. which to you recommend and i saw your review already ..all around lenses...

[@cglasadventure8473]

pls add me on facebook .. [e-mail] or cg las .... or i will add.you.

[@christopherfrost]

Take a look at my reviews of those lenses, or check out my superzoom lens comparison video. The Sigma lens is a little sharper at the telephoto end

[@Secure-IT]

Absolutely great effort, I wish I could test as many lenses as you did and play around with them. As an amateur I would like to suggest testing out Canon’s EF 35mm f/2 IS USM and Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Zoom Lens for Canon and give your results/review on these as well.

[@aliitrat]

I currently have a canon's 18-55mm kit lens and the nifty 50mm f1.8 lens. I am looking forward to buy the Canon 70-200mm f4L usm lens, what are your thoughts about it and do you guys have a better recommendation than this lens in the same price range.

[@christopherfrost]

Take a look at my review. The 70-200 is nice but the 55-250 IS STM might offer you a little more

[@jeromemundy7189]

I have a canon 5To with kit lens but recently purchased a Sigma 120-400 lens. But using the Canon 18-55 in AV mode is the lowest f-stop best for sharp focus. So confused on f stop. But I did like your review. So much to learn with this new camera