SMOrc the Deck Aggro Druid | Galakrond's Awakening |Hearthstone

[@ChumpHS]

AAECAZICBK8E9v0CtLYDn7cDDQxA9wPmBZoIpu8CwIYDxoYDzpQD+a0D/60D6rADurYDAA==

[@florianvanloo4109]

I made this deck ages ago and took it easily to rank 5. Here's my list: AAECAZICBK8E4QTmBZ+3Aw1AtAW3BqbvAu/xAsCGA8aGA+SKA86UA/OnA/mtA/+tA/m1AwA= You could probably fit in Felwing somewhere.

[@Shuhister]

Glinda + Felwing maybe?

[@21centdregs]

keep em comin. i love the quick deck analysis pre-match and the creative off meta/non-blizzard brand stamp approach

[@RobotMax]

Everytime I dust a trash card Chump makes a deck around it

[@ser6Ijvolk]

Don't make a habit out of dusting cards unless they have rotated out or you absolutely need to in order to craft a competitive deck. And even if they did rotate, keeping enough for a deck is recommended in case you ever decide to try Wild, and most people do at some point. In Classic for example, there have been enough nerfs and buffs for players who stockpile duplicates to get several times worth the dust they normally would have gotten from disenchanting.

[@barrytschirpig9328]

That second priest game felt so satisfying after how the first one went.

[@ian251]

I bet he was salty after that game

[@dragodin]

I paused your video by mistake and it took me a full minute to understand it was indeed paused

[@ser6Ijvolk]

3:45 Builds a deck around a card. Doesn't read that card's text. That's our Chump!

[@akaliislifeakaliislove5968]

that was the first ever psуchopomp off a psуchopomp I've seen...

[@TheDragonLord12341]

That face when te priest played the water bearer pretty much sums up the priest matchup experience

[@MasterWhimp]

That priest game was brutal. Funny seeing a salt chump.

[@themaharishi8160]

I like that you sprinkle in a loss here and there. Makes you one in a billion of game content creators everyone else has 100% win rate on youtube ^^

[@WheezyShotta]

Love getting hearthstone ads on a hearthstone video. Really seals the deal

[@flimpeenflarmpoon1353]

17:03 I hate priest too lmao

[@TheNewton]

Flimpeen Flarmpoon the problem is the graveyard mechanics are too easy to cheese and harder to disrupt

[@ramonestefano]

Where my boy Gonk at?

[@kjlh9]

Stuck in combo purgatory

[@dwreanchinotan]

goin feral

[@Shivertehtimbers]

Everyone's face after losing to mana addict druid dafuq.gif

[@ser6Ijvolk]

Always enjoyable seeing someone outSMOrc an orc.

[@fracktar]

Priest feels horrible to play against with half of the decks in the game

[@TheNewton]

Joe Simpson the graveyard shouldn't be infinite, one goes in one comes out its empty

[@fracktar]

@@TheNewton Perhaps. Or maybe just they could not print several of the best board clears at the same time as resurrection support.

[@Athanatov]

@@TheNewton Better make sure Priest doesn't have a single viable deck!

[@ser6Ijvolk]

@@Athanatov They can't balance Priest worth shit. Either it's a monster or a meme, either you kill them easily or get locked-out, either the match-up is 10% winrate or 90%.

[@Athanatov]

@@ser6Ijvolk except Priest currently is neither

[@victorkenrick2088]

Longer or more, best hearthtuber

[@wholemilky]

I think an odd deck of this in wild would be pretty cool.

[@jewishdictionary1715]

HELLO DADDY CHUMP

[@wasabi25J]

trading off psychopomp before rezzing zill, what kind of legend players are these... the netdecking kind

[@wasabi25J]

maybe i am wrong but there was definitely more thought required, or maybe he needed the 1 in 3 to win, i think there was a more consistent play involving the 50/50 res first

[@matthiasp3225]

The only minion in his respool was Zilliax at this point, so no 50/50 involved, it was guaranteed Zill res before the trade. He just blundered. Should have played Psychopomp first, then trade, then breath, and he would have a almost fresh Zilliax still on board after it + even more Zilliax in the res pool.

[@ser6Ijvolk]

@@matthiasp3225 Not how the res pool works. It's always an equal percentage for each minion type dead regardless of copies dead. That's how players pull off resurrecting the good minion they need to win with their graveyard full of tokens in those salt highlights.

[@ser6Ijvolk]

@Radjon That would be the more intuitive mechanic, yes, doesn't mean it's the case though. The way I described it was the way it absolutely certainly was some years ago. Maybe it was meant to be the way you described it, but was also bugged to hell like so many other parts of the game. I've seen res games that made absolutely no sense if you go by dead minion copies. Regardless, the res pool is far from being a precise mechanic.

[@ser6Ijvolk]

@Radjon No, you see, it isn't how chances work. High-rolling several times in a row happens quite rarely in real life. But clown fiestas are incredibly common. There are either bugs no one bothered to fix or intentional biases in the code toward more impactful outcomes to make the game "more fun". Seeing an opponent who had swarms of tokens die consistently resurrect the one good minion in his pool isn't something that should happen if each death has an equal chance of being rolled.

[@TheNewton]

Sticky fingers seems like a good tech for this with dragon hunter and Lance warriors

[@ser6Ijvolk]

Why would you randomly propose tech for those match-ups? Are they very likely? Does this deck struggle against them without Sticky Fingers and wins with his inclusion?

[@kemp10]

Your voice reminds me of the Gay Robot sketch with Nick Swardson from early youtube

[@ElBandito]

Chumpmaster.

[@badwulff]

9:15 I feel this was a misplay: it seems better to take the trade with the Treant here, as Mana Addict represents way more potential damage. I see no reason to send 3 face instead of trading to protect your Addict, but maybe I'm missing something.

[@lemniskuslateralis7996]

Mana addict is good only if you can pump spells into it. And missing 3 dmg was probably not worth to protect him when you have 1 non-spell in hand. Also, opponent then took a bait and attacked Addict while it was less dmg on board, so all and all, it was a good play imo.

[@wasabi25J]

my first thoughts after watching intro is that 1mana stealth draw engine, or do you only ever draw 1?

[@ser6Ijvolk]

Spirit only has value if your deck strategy is board control. It synergizes with some cards in the deck but not the aggro deck type.

[@JohnMatayas]

What about Questing Adventurer instead of Thug?

[@ser6Ijvolk]

Certainly not instead of Thug, that card is too good in anything that hits with face. And this is an aggro deck, even though mana costs are low, the only time his hand is full is when he completes the quest. This pretty much turns Adventurer into a card he can only consistently stick and buff during his endgame push.

[@RickyMuzakki]

Why no gonk and spirit for extra control and card draw

[@ser6Ijvolk]

Gonk is slow and Spirit is a 0 tempo draw that only has value if your deck strategy is board control. They synergize with some cards in the deck but not the aggro deck type.

[@Ramen10420]

Seems like questing adventurer would be better than thug in this deck.

[@ser6Ijvolk]

I'll essentially copy my comment from the answer to another guy who proposed Adventurer: this is an aggro deck, even though mana costs are low, the only time his hand is big and he has enough mana is when he completes the quest midgame. This pretty much turns Adventurer into a card he can only consistently stick and buff during his endgame push.

[@umbrawolf950]

This doesn't look like a hunter deck? are you surreee its aggro?

[@fumioshwartz7114]

priest players need psychiatric help

[@Bruh-el9js]

Do you plan on playing wild at some point ? You're way too creative for standard

[@rawovunlapin8201]

Dude, he literally made 2 wilds vids like 2 weeks ago

[@wxyzmarkus6834]

Go check Dane's video if you like off meta decks. He is doing a oretty good job too!

[@Bruh-el9js]

@@wxyzmarkus6834 I know and like dane, but he's not nearly as creative as chump is

[@Bruh-el9js]

@@rawovunlapin8201 I don't watch every single hearthstone video from every channel I follow except for Trump, I was talking about him getting an entire month or two and focusingn on wild for the time being

[@rawovunlapin8201]

@@Bruh-el9js I don't watch every video of every channel I'm subscribed to either, just thought you'd like to know. Seeing as you appear unaware of Chump's opinion of wild, I'll just recount what I remember of it: It's a toxic wasteland that only contains the dredges of humanity. Or maybe it just contained hyper aggro & combo decks refined over the years with a carpool larger than any other in hearthstone? Anyway, the point is that the decks are so powerful that trying some of his whackier creations becomes pointless since they'd be mercilessly crushed to odd paladin, secret mage, even shaman, renolock, quest mage and the other giants of the wild meta. I'll admit that I'd like to see more wild content from Chump, but it is what it is and I can respect his reasons for avoiding it.

[@0226roger]

😩 Chump can SMOrc me anytime he wants tho 😳🤫

[@cinomin228]

The only FACE I care about is his 😯😯🥵🥵