Church’s Shoes | Antony and Paul Examine a Pair with a Surprising Fault in the Leather

[@adrianevans9575]

I'm surprised the customer didn't send the back. 👍👍👍

[@wonkydonkey7899]

The customer perhaps didn’t even notice that, thanking that it’s just a crease from wearing.

[@ianarn]

Should have bought a Cheaney shoe in the Imperial collection! He’d have a way better sole on the shoe as well and probably save a bit of money also.

[@shoehealer8853]

Absolutely spot on 👍

[@holymoly6829]

Well spotted guys Will Mr Church compensate I wonder They are great shoes though ✊

[@olatusijazz8155]

I believe the shoe is sold as a factory second, this can't be first-quality. 3:02

[@shoehealer8853]

Couldn’t see it marked anywhere, will try to find out from the customer.

[@DavidBoyes]

Should’ve bought Crockett & Jones.

[@witzendski]

Will that vein affect the durability of the leather in the vamp area or is it 'just' a cosmetic issue?

[@syednaumanhussain6658]

The latter.

[@Yorkshiremadmick]

Gorgeous Shoe But that needs sending back to Churches

[@colinfarrell6444]

Church's quality has definitely reduced over the years in my experience

[@JamieW-o7b]

That was a shame to see. I had always wanted a pair of truly well made shoes. Quality seems a little alien in the UK these days?

[@shoehealer8853]

Thankfully we don't see much of this.. And Northampton is still the epicentre of the world for good shoes. Thanks for your input 👍

[@jackster285]

Gone down hill since Prada took over and cut corners. Not worth the money these days.

[@Mk-oy9ns]

It'll be that Chinese leather,...................................😂😂😂😂😂😂 " price is no measure of quality " sadly!

[@mikewinston8709]

The stitch density on the sole is poor too. Thirty years ago it was higher. Church’s are very poor these days; Barker or Loake quality.

[@shoehealer8853]

Seen that mentioned a few times on here