Cisco ASA Version 8.3 Network Address Translation (NAT)

[@CiscoCommunity]

Watch this video as it outlines the basic concepts behind configuration Network Address Translation (NAT) on the Cisco ASA platform in software version 8.3. cs.co/6266jRgp

[@velavanvijayakumar9759]

This is one of the best video i have seen which explains the new Cisco NAT polices. I really appreciate the effort that you have taken to give a clean explanation

[@ioannis69k]

Thanks ! Your explanation was clear and loud ;-) Great video !

[@CiscoCommunity]

@ioannis69k Thank you for the feedback. Take a look at other videos as well on this channel. We hope that you'll find them useful as well.

[@SYK2014]

EXCELLENT DETAIL Thanks for the info

[@mohammedkayed6253]

Thanks for the explanation, but I have a question regarding last part why did you used static no dynamic ? I am a little mixing in between , is the static used if someone established a connection from the out side that no exist in the routing table ? or its applied for both direction and the dynamic only from inside to outside please someone clarify for me.

[@ciatsite]

this is a very good instructional video for those like me who are new to the ASA. Can you please add the link for the ASA 8.3 command line configuration guide. Thanks

[@wolfrm3]

very helpful video. I have a question though. how do you do multiple ports for the same global ip to a single internal ip. this version is confusing me so much. pre 8.3 was a breeze.

[@opusofthenight]

Great Video and Explanations!!

[@MrJimmychern]

On the example of converting the DMZserver, he says we can use global IP address 209.165.201.28. The diagram shows one external IP address 209.165.201.2/27. If the is only one line to the internet, can you use the .28 address?

[@freqcy]

Good tutorial, fast but clear. Like to get the command line document. Can't see link

[@jesusbastardo-sosa5045]

Nice info. Thanks !

[@velavanvijayakumar9759]

Thanks a Lot Jay ....

[@patg5560]

fantastic stuff

[@todierik]

anyone know what program is used for demo? tx

[@sukki151190]

Awesome..

[@geekpuppet]

Thanks!

[@RogueDire]

It will always be difficult if all you do is memorize commands, it all makes sense if you understand how it works.

[@rajat21241]

thanks ... :)

[@MrSynapse81]

NAT translation is much more frustrating. I'm a little pissed they screwed with it. Before it was simple to understand.

[@PaulGilbert-CCIE]

the video is good but I still don't like this new NAT configuration.

[@boborg13]

"show run object" and "show run nat" combination is OK if you have just a couple of statements, but if there are 10's or hundreds of them it becomes a nightmare! shame on you cisco

[@steveeyler]

The new NAT rules absolutely suck! Why take something that was easy and make if more complex? Ridiculous.

[@camrober]

I agree. This new NAT method is counter-intuitive. The cisco developers must have been on some bad granola to produce this shite.

[@2wados416]

... its actually very straight forward if you've ever done any programming. you define an object which is an IP range, then perform an operation on that object I don't see what is so hard about any of that

[@shadkhan7985]

can't you make it simple....