Buddy Swan as the young Charles Foster Kane in Orson Welle's 'Citizen Kane.' Haunting photography starkly shows the solitude of the boy, hinting at the forces which will shape his life.
Пікірлер: 188
@zakbrownrigg14 жыл бұрын
This movie is like the antithesis of Its a Wonderful Life
@richardsiciliano71172 жыл бұрын
Notice how the father stands with his hands behind his back. We see Kane stand that way a couple of times later in the film. The attention to detail in this film is incredible.
@jordanenby9734 Жыл бұрын
I watched the film recently and I didn't see that until I read this, that really is good attention to detail.
@notnek2022 жыл бұрын
As children we can’t wait to grow up and as adults we long for childhood.
@josetrevino7303 жыл бұрын
I read up on this film long before I watched it, I knew what Rosebud was going into my first time seeing this. Even though I knew, I found it difficult watching this scene without getting all choked up. All I could picture was my son, how anyone could do something like this regardless of the money. This was Kane in really his only moment that we the audience see him truly happy, a moment that he would long for at the end of his life.
@joshmclendon371810 жыл бұрын
"I'm asking you for the last time...anybody who thinks i haven't been a good husband or father....." "The sum of 50,000 dollars a year will be paid to you and Mr Kane as long as you both live" "Well let's hope it's all for the best"
@MultiCrimsonRain9 жыл бұрын
Money, the most persuasive force on the planet.
@TheSMLIFfilms8 жыл бұрын
Foreshadowing?
@andrewmcdonald16146 жыл бұрын
lol
@catsadilla3245 жыл бұрын
you have to remember that USD$50,000 in the later part of the 19th century is equivalent to about $1.5 million today. I mean.... a grubby boy or a good fortune..... is there even a question?
@Gr8Layks5 жыл бұрын
m I o . o I m You’re sick in the head.
@Ofinfinitejest3 жыл бұрын
This is one of the harshest, most meaningful scenes ever put on film.
@MissKateSamuels10 жыл бұрын
Rosebud represented his childhood. He lost it when they sent him away
@Rodrigoteacher9 жыл бұрын
Sezja Atrinae Orson once said something like"perhaps human's greatest tragedy of all is the lost of innocence" Rosebud!
@MissKateSamuels9 жыл бұрын
Rodrigo Serrano Hm, that's a good one...
@TheSMLIFfilms8 жыл бұрын
Rosebud. Incredibly profound, yet oh so simplistic.
@summer-c7i3 жыл бұрын
Rosebud, his only true friend
@scmayo3 жыл бұрын
spoiler alert!?!?
@Jojoateyt8 жыл бұрын
I love how they talk over each other.
@crimsondynamo6152 жыл бұрын
It actually feels like a natural conversation. It’s something that this and Howard Hawks movies i love that do this.
@killer92173 Жыл бұрын
@@crimsondynamo615 even Steven Spielberg and Martin Scorcese use this technique.
@christophercompton274 Жыл бұрын
I interrupted someone while they were talking once and mum told me off. So after that I would wait until the other person had finished speaking before I spoke.
@chloesheler19274 жыл бұрын
This was heartbreaking to watch, but in a good way. Beautifully done, complete artwork.
@ProffesorObvious12 жыл бұрын
I love the way he's framed in the window; it's like Thatcher might as well say "I want that boy--the one in the window!"
HOLY SHIT I JUST NOTICED SOMETHING!!! 3:10 “You’re gonna see Chicago and New York and Washington maybe!” Chicago - Kane built the municipal opera house. New York - Kane put his headquarters there. Washington MAYBE - Kane wants to MAYBE be president before shooting himself in the foot.
@sha11235 Жыл бұрын
He didn't run for President, but Governor.
@ravishingravi8 жыл бұрын
The kid looks quite like Orson Welles.
@anggaperkasa81197 жыл бұрын
I watсhееd Citizеn Каnе full mоviееe hеrе twitter.com/599e5c352338de337/status/795841908022984704 Citizеn Кaanе bоуhооd
@ashtonreid8496 жыл бұрын
ravishingravi uyww
@bazookabrett41362 жыл бұрын
hardly a cut in the whole sequence. masterful work
@pedrobakale71804 жыл бұрын
these nasty adults prepare the future and the rest of Kane's life, while he has fun in the snow. that's cruel
@lordalessan3 жыл бұрын
Preparing him for a good education as he makes a lot of money. Those bastards.
@ellajones97873 жыл бұрын
@@lordalessan And what good did it do him? Two failed marriages, his only child dead, vultures picking at him, enemies everywhere, virtually no friends, family gone, and finally dying alone and almost forgotten surround by hoarded junk. Yeah, those bastards.
@NKW8972 жыл бұрын
Well it’s also kind of hinted that the father is abusive and that is why she wants to send the boy away
@CommentGangStrong3 ай бұрын
@@NKW897 spare the rod spoil the child, it's his mother who is worrisome.
@tammiwhami9 жыл бұрын
Yep that Very Deep Focus. Anges Moorehead is Excellent. One of the Best 4 minute in film history.
@doublenegativetactical14023 жыл бұрын
I'm a single father. This shit breaks my heart so much.....
@brianvirgin29953 жыл бұрын
This scene is really heartbreaking.
@wvcricker56835 жыл бұрын
Agnes Morehead was such an under rated actress... She was not only an amazing actress, but also beautiful
@aslater5 Жыл бұрын
I just realized this was the mother in Bewitched.
@erikfreitas70937 ай бұрын
She was great in “The Magnificent Ambersons”, another Orson Welles film
@Coganboy10 жыл бұрын
This to me is the definition of a true irony. The father, while he's tough and abrasive (implied abusive), probably would've done better for the boy considering how the movie ends. Kane missed his childhood and innocence more than anything.
@dkupke10 жыл бұрын
While the father does come across as borderline abusive, he is actually showing a genuine interest in his son. The mother passes him off to a practical stranger with a gesture. Kane's relentless pursuit of excess in his later life is overcompensation of his feelings of loneliness from being raised in an unloving environment that was forced onto him, and his tendency to push away the people who actually do care about him is because he fears abandonment, as his parents abandoned him.
@Coganboy10 жыл бұрын
Daniel Ryan Bingo. But honestly, I didn't think the dad was abusive. It's strange, but my dad spanked me when I was younger, and I don't look at it like abuse. I look at it like he cared enough about me to care that I did the right thing and acted appropriate. While the mother is almost in a friggin trance!
@dkupke10 жыл бұрын
Coganboy I'm crossing into fanfiction here, but I think it is obvious the parents do not have a good marriage. The father is noticeably older than the mother, and is, for lack of a better term, seems to be a simpler man, not quite as sophisticated as the younger mother. Her complete lack of emotion and the fact that she seems to have deliberately intended for the property that produces their sudden wealth to be in her name alone implies a longstanding marital split. So I suspect she is transferring her emotions onto her son; in her mind, by getting him out of these humble surroundings and away from the man she so resents, she is ensuring a better life for her son. But what she really wants is those things for herself, and by pushing them on her son she is actually setting him up for a lifetime of personal failures.
@johnbonaccorsi8 жыл бұрын
The mother doesn't pass him off with a gesture. She's obviously numb with pain, as she's about to send her son away forever. In the scene's first moment, while Thatcher is patiently waiting for her to sign the documents, her attention is entirely on Charles, to whom she's calling, whom she's advising to bundle up, against the cold. It's only as the moment of truth approaches that she steels herself, calls with a voice that she struggles to keep sober, firm, but that breaks: "Charles!" What genuine interest is the father showing? In front of Mr. Thatcher, yes, he's gentle with the boy. Do you think there are no abusive fathers who manage to appear fatherly when their children and they are in front of others? The moment he's under stress, the façade breaks: "What that kid needs is a good thrashing." The mother has no choice but to get Charles out of there.
@ashleymorris96573 жыл бұрын
@@johnbonaccorsi Exactly, the mother knows it’s only a matter of time before the father starts abusing Charles the same way he has abused her. Hence the line, “That’s why he’s going to be brought up where you can’t get at him.” She would rather send her only child away and never to see him again, than watch him endure the same abuse she has had to endure over the years. It doesn’t get any more self-sacrificial or motherly than that.
@ralphmoran681 Жыл бұрын
You can see the influences of this film in so many movies today. People take for granted the evolution of cinema. We had to evolve to the point we’re at, and while it seems like it took forever, it was actually pretty damn fast.
@emily71033 жыл бұрын
Wow. Absolutely stunning cinematography for the time.
@markhager22163 жыл бұрын
“that property is as much as mine as it is hers, now that it’s valuable...” lol. The kid playing young Charles is fantastic. This cuts out before one of my favorite scenes where it’s “Merry Christmas, Charles” to the young boy “and a happy new year...” as he’s dictating the letter to Charles when he comes into full inheritance.
@lordalessan3 жыл бұрын
The way Charles greets his father shows that even though he is abusive, he loved his father and probably would’ve had a happier life with him.
@SymphonyBrahms3 жыл бұрын
No child can have a happy life with an abusive parent.
@KarasuInaiga3 жыл бұрын
@@SymphonyBrahms Subjectively happier, not objectively happy. It's a matter of perspective, not absolutes.
@Literallyryangosling777 Жыл бұрын
@@SymphonyBrahms times were diferent back then
@JV-jg1tn Жыл бұрын
@@SymphonyBrahms happier than a worse foster system or the streets
@killer92173 Жыл бұрын
@SymphonyBrahms I don't think he comes off as Abusive. Back in those days, parents would think it's okay to whip you with a belt. what I think is despite his harsh punishment, he seems to be a caring father and you can tell he's trying hard to cheer up the boy. Honestly if you ask me, the mother is the true villain of the story cuz she's the one that sent him away, and what led him to a unhappy life.
@p_ash2591 Жыл бұрын
Peut-être la meilleure séquence jamais réalisée. Le reste du film et les décennies qui suivront pourront me donner tort, mais TOUT y est parfait. La mise en scène, le jeu et les mouvements des acteurs (rien que le père qui se tient voûté pour ne pas être plus grand que le banquier). Tout est parfait
@theboombody14 жыл бұрын
I can't believe the lady in this scene is Endora from Bewitched. Who would have ever thought that she was a gorgeous woman earlier in her career? Seriously, I can't even recognize her.
@the.seagull.3510 жыл бұрын
That deep focus
@rameshsunar201Ай бұрын
This scene has so much depth. And gives meaning to the ending. Makes my eyes watery
@fw59952 жыл бұрын
I just realized how this was clearly mirrored by George Lucas when he wrote the origin story for Anakin Skywalker. Hell, Darth Vader really is Charles Foster Kane in space lol
@scummbaggery Жыл бұрын
Old movie but damn heart breaking.
@pookerville8 жыл бұрын
I recognize the music...I heard it in the TCM doc "100 Years At The Movies."
@machinerage69414 жыл бұрын
lol im here because of a senior project about deep focus
@sarans40043 жыл бұрын
I'm also here because of deep focus lol
@borbetomagus5 ай бұрын
Another explained the deep focus here as 'Depth as Fate'.
@ragejoona4314 жыл бұрын
Just think how hard it was to block the end of the scene so that nobody could see what's written on the sled. I know it's kept off screen most of the time, but when Charlie hits him, the actors had to be positioned perfectly so that nobody would see it.
@jamesm20788 ай бұрын
I watched this in my Video Production class when going over shallow/deep focus and this is a really good example of that.
@jamesmcdonough65239 жыл бұрын
The outfits look like they're out of Charles Dickens work.
@aslater54 жыл бұрын
Well it is supposed to be the Victorian era
@quinna55373 жыл бұрын
It's 1871, the same year Chicago went up in flames
@jeffreyyoung436411 жыл бұрын
my five favorite american films: citizen kane, the godfather, raging bull, city lights, vertigo.
@bigstar664 жыл бұрын
All great picks
@user-pw4rw3nz7y3 ай бұрын
The pivotal scene in this film! Everything about it is fantastic. Prof. Dr. Dr. H. James Birx, New York
@AndNowLadiesandGents9 жыл бұрын
Money, who needs it, I'll settle for a sledge.
@rappadapp10 жыл бұрын
RooooseBuuudd.....
@Crackmode1193 жыл бұрын
🐻 Bobo
@beyondz554 ай бұрын
One of the most amazing cinema scenes in history
@directedbyerick16529 жыл бұрын
"You almost hurt me!" lol hilarious
@RootbeerAndBeans11 жыл бұрын
and both have beautiful scores!
@ivorharden4 жыл бұрын
Rosebud was the name of his sled which gets burned at the end of the film. Although he had money and a marriage, Rosebud was the only thing to give him happiness within his life.
@hcombs01044 жыл бұрын
The late, great Agnes Moorehead.👏 The beginning of her film career. Too bad she couldn't get an earlier start in film. Would she have had more of a chance of playing leads?
@lxH4WK3Rxl9 жыл бұрын
This movie is heaven
@bruisemeister6 жыл бұрын
I swore when I first saw this on VHS that he uttered the word Rosebud when he was out playing.
@christophercompton274 Жыл бұрын
Notice that the interior scene was all done in one shot. Likewise with most of the following exterior scenes. All credit goes to the cameraman, cast and director who all have to work as one. These days there is a lot of different angles and editing of short clips in films.
@andrewmcdonald16143 жыл бұрын
Why would Mr. Thatcher want to raise a kid who obviously hates his guts? If I was Thatcher I'd be like "I already have more money than I ever could possibly spend. I don't need this shit."
@petersmithyy45562 жыл бұрын
The music steals me
@rufuspipemos3 жыл бұрын
$50,000 per year in 1871 is now $1,096,000 per year. "Well... hope it works out for the best!" LOL.
@temmy96 жыл бұрын
Charles had a weak father. Everything else flows from that.
@moonsmonsters4 жыл бұрын
There's a scene analysis that does it better but here's a paraphrase The father had no power in this scene. The bank guy didn't pay him any attention. The mom had all the power. She sold her son away. This is still the case for many fathers today.
@aa-th2vj4 жыл бұрын
But what is a weak father. How do you become one. We must think fundamentally
@TheCoolProfessor4 жыл бұрын
What some consider the best is an incontestable act of cruelty.
@rowandavis33768 жыл бұрын
THE CHAIR MOVES 1:57
@VixxKong24 жыл бұрын
The crew moved it out of the way of the camera
@hanksam98543 жыл бұрын
Music in this movie at times reminds one of the music of Taxi Driver. No surprise, since it's the same composer.
@disgruntledpedant27554 жыл бұрын
The father seems like a good guy to me
@kamdan20116 жыл бұрын
Is this when they digitally removed the snow falling because they thought it was grain?
@davegray24283 жыл бұрын
Look at that camera movement
@malloryavila97623 жыл бұрын
how many cuts are made in this scene?
@CutHardstylez9 жыл бұрын
why did he adopt the boy in the first place?
@bigstar664 жыл бұрын
The mother gave him away so the father couldn’t beat his ass anymore
@brendaluv20172 жыл бұрын
What kind of like did Charles lived? They believe being rich was the best thing for happiness but it’s not. This movie isn’t far from reality, I can take it that there was real life events that inspired this movie but who knows how many people heed this warning ⚠️
@DavidJones-ye2if5 жыл бұрын
0:01-0:19 TCM Presents 100 Years at the Movies.
@NicholasABerk5 жыл бұрын
anyone else thinks Jim Kane sounds like Mr. Magoo?
@Vollidiot3912 жыл бұрын
padme amedala stole her hair
@johnisaacraj89086 ай бұрын
Why did the mother send him away? Whats the reasonm
@H812346 жыл бұрын
His mother clearly didn't love him. She wasn't torn up about it or anything. She was so quick to sign those papers.
@domenicomarzolla30456 жыл бұрын
I believe she was trying to get him as far away as possible from his abusive father and to a better future of wealth.
@axyboo3 жыл бұрын
she was torn up about it, pay attention to details !!
@itskelvinn8 жыл бұрын
wtf was the point of 2:07 "CHARLES" and then ive got his trunk all packed... ive had it packed for a week now
@johnbonaccorsi8 жыл бұрын
Knowing she's about to send her boy away forever, so he'll be out of reach of an abusive father, she has steeled herself for the separation. In the scene's first moments, as I said below, to another commenter, her attention is entirely on young Charles, whom she lovingly advises to bundle up, against the cold. As the moment of truth approaches, she suppresses her emotion and calls to the boy with a voice that she struggles to keep firm, sober, but that breaks: "Charles!" It's a masterpiece.
@jonathanblaze16484 жыл бұрын
Also great subtext by Agnes, knowing the mother may be thinking/feeling this is the last time she'll call out to her son, it was a moment for her.
@ArmyJames10 ай бұрын
"The Union Forever!": as his guardianship is signed over to a stranger by his own parents.
@ringkunmori11 ай бұрын
It's always so jarring to hear that the dad is abusive towards Charles when with very little we see of him, he comes off as a nice guy who occasionally disciplines his kid. It makes me think there is a lot more we don't know about the family.
@taraterm35 жыл бұрын
I dont understand why the boy was sent away...couldnt Mom have gone with him? she had zillion dollars at her disposal, she could have left her no good husband and gone off to raise the boy herself, or at least put him in a great school and visited him all the time. There doesnt seem to be a coherent reason why she couldnt have been part of the boys life.I always thought this was a major plot fail...and assumed she was terminelly ill and wouldnt be around for the boy and wanted to make sure he was in good hands {not the fathers} before she passed on, but there's no indication that she was dying.Would have been so easy too...they could have had her watching through a window and then focused in on a bottle of pills or given her a tubercular cough or something.
@brendaluv20172 жыл бұрын
On another track it could be she never wanted the boy or believed there was no other way that’s just theory
@HenryConway0074 жыл бұрын
And we got STAR WARS: EPISODE I - THE PHANTOM MENACE because George Lucas wanted to recreate this scene. I know I’m right.
@name-tn2or4 жыл бұрын
HenryConway007 what do you mean. Edit: nevermind
@Demille402 жыл бұрын
There’s no way Vertigo is better than this film.
@ThisbeandPyramus8 жыл бұрын
Was Fred Graves the boy's biological father?
@paulb447310 ай бұрын
Rosebud in the very first scene
@sarafox57922 жыл бұрын
but why do they want the boy anyway? how is he worth so much??
@JustSomeCanadianGuy10 ай бұрын
The Bizarro version of Bruce Wayne’s upbringing. He loses his parents without them dying!
@5ilver425 жыл бұрын
I dunno... I've seen the rest of the movie, a good thrashing could have been exactly what he needed.
@nirgru4 жыл бұрын
0:12
@disgruntledpedant27554 жыл бұрын
Yeah....she shoulda consulted an attorney before making ironclad contracts with this cityslicker.
@haanerhhs11 жыл бұрын
its because she wants him to be safe from his father's abusive and alcoholic behaviour
@CharlesXavier2 жыл бұрын
"Charles, would you like to continue living with your loving, natural parents... or would you rather live with this twisted, loveless billionaire?” Charles: (jumps into billionaire’s car) *”Let’s roll!”* 😎
@ggj19877 жыл бұрын
Can anyone explain what happens in this scene? It's probably the most important scene in the whole movie but I don't quite understand it. What happens and why do his parents sign papers to send him away?
@annakimborahpa7 жыл бұрын
Mrs. Kane saying "That's why he's going to be brought up where you can't get at him" (4:01- 4:03), in response to her husband saying that young Charles needs a good thrashing, indicates her fear of extreme corporal punishment for the child. It was Mrs. Kane who forces the situation because she alone owns the mining shares and is determined in the hope of getting a better life for her son. Her dour expression throughout the scene indicates the unhappiness of her life which she feels chained to.
@ggj19877 жыл бұрын
But how did they get all that money all of the sudden? I don't get that. They were poor at first, weren't they?
@annakimborahpa7 жыл бұрын
Yes, they were poor at first. However, quoting Charles' father from 0:50 to 1:02: "A boarder that beats his bill and leaves worthless stock behind ... that property is just as much my property as anybody's now that it's valuable, and if Fred Graves (the boarder) had any idea all this was going to happen, he'd have made out those certificates in both our names." As owner of the boarding house, Mrs. Kane came into the possession of certificates granting her ownership of a mine, elsewhere referred to in the film as 'the Colorado lode, the world's sixth largest gold mine' or words to that effect.
@titan133760 Жыл бұрын
@@ggj1987Because the seemingly worthless mine that Charles Kane's mother inherited, turned out to have a large deposit of gold, thus making her family instantly weathly
@diamonddog1311 ай бұрын
@titan133760 I get all that, but why was the contract with Thatcher dependent on giving up guardianship of Charles? Why could the same financial arrangement with the bank not be made without that? And what did Thatcher have to gain by taking on the responsibility of raising the boy?
@Klemeron6 жыл бұрын
If I could be as well as Orson Welles, I think I'd be well in my mind to swell with wellness that quells the welling smell in my literal well and all would be well.
@biancanapoles17253 жыл бұрын
I LOVE your avatar!!!!!!!!
@Klemeron3 жыл бұрын
@@biancanapoles1725 thanks, i drew it myself quite a while ago
@justoutofframemoviereviews656Ай бұрын
Rosebud...
@calebrodriguez90422 жыл бұрын
I have bad diarrhea
@calebrodriguez90422 жыл бұрын
nice
@GeraldinePng10 жыл бұрын
FREE DOWNLOAD OF SONG ABOUT CITIZEN KANE www.reverbnation.com/geraldinepng/song/1625334-hello-mr-kane
@qhdevon435 жыл бұрын
I have analysed this film in comparison with the ending of the movie where it shows the sled with the rosebud word on it. This sled is NOT the same sled as is used at the end of the movie. Yes I know rosebud is most likley a symbol of his childhood but this movie has a huge error in it in which during the filming of this , they did not use the same sled. No where on this sled i nthis shot do you see the "accent" marks on the sled or the words "rosebud". Yep...Nick at nite classic rerun error!
@aa-th2vj4 жыл бұрын
you see part of the rose petal in this scene when he attacks the guy but not the word
@user-qi6eh2vr6t4 ай бұрын
That lady pimped out her own son. That's cold.
@disgruntledpedant27554 жыл бұрын
"We have to stay here." WHY???
@merrimac2902 жыл бұрын
The real villain of the movie was the father. His mother should have just divorced his ass and made him poor.
@lh9591 Жыл бұрын
Messed up. His mom didn’t do it just for the money, but so Charlie wouldn’t get hit.
@atreyu45922 жыл бұрын
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhadrien
@Ayvaliklis4 жыл бұрын
bobo, bobo! I meant lobo, they never should have cancelled that show! Lobo, lobo, bring back sheriff lobo!!
@JustSomeCanadianGuy10 ай бұрын
The mother is so vile to do this. She could have just killed the father and done more for Charles. 😂
@daborshy40897 жыл бұрын
I don't get why people say the dad was bad. There's not enough evidence for that. Charles genuinely deserves an ass-whooping in this scene.
@GuruJudge217 жыл бұрын
An ass-whooping for a child lashing out at the man trying to take him away from his home and separate him from his parents? The fuck? Also, his dad is a bad because he's willing to sell his son for money.
@daborshy40897 жыл бұрын
It's the best decision for all parties involved
@H812346 жыл бұрын
Best decision. He died miserable. He was never happy. He was ripped away from his parents. His parents gave him away for money. They didn't love him. Imagine growing up knowing your parents sold you? I would rather have my parents than all the money in the world.
@itskelvinn8 жыл бұрын
3:15 why is the dad so fucking creepy
@johnbonaccorsi8 жыл бұрын
Because he's a creep, which is why the mother's getting the boy out of there.
@ToonReel0017 жыл бұрын
Did he have to stare blatantly at the camera like that? :P
@mygoogleemail20632 жыл бұрын
The problem with millennials is they never got a good thrashing.
@TheSMLIFfilms8 жыл бұрын
This movie sucks 2/10. It's supposed to be winter, but you can't even see the characters breath. It's like they shot this scene on a soundstage in Chicago covered in cornflakes instead of a snowy field in Kenosha.
@abbygus18 жыл бұрын
+TheSMLIFfilms It was 1941. The cameras weren't exactly 1080p.
@abbygus18 жыл бұрын
+TheSMLIFfilms The cinematography was in fact hugely innovative for the time, especially with its use of deep focus and extreme angles.
@CODMarioWarfare8 жыл бұрын
+Adam Gustafson Film has a tremendous resolution. Also, you're replying to a grade of trolling that's remarkably vapid, even by post-Google+ KZbin comment standards.
@manantial7737 жыл бұрын
You suck.
@MurrTV5 жыл бұрын
Why do you think this was shot in Chicago? Gone with the Wind wasn't shot in Atlanta. 2001 wasn't shot on a space ship. Kane was shot on a sound stage at RKO. You are looking at an incredibly compressed image that was recorded off air, probably on VHS tape. My guess is you've never seen this film projected from a clean, 35 mm print, otherwise you wouldn't make such an observation.