Civil Procedure MBE Favorites first video

[@DonYutuc]

Who's watching in 2024? JD Advising is my favorite KZbin Bar 🍸 Prep channel!

[@amrsalah4]

Please post more of this, very good explanation into the point

[@ReadBetweenTheFrets]

Best explanation of impleader I’ve heard. Thank you!

[@JDAdvising]

You're welcome! We are so glad it was helpful!!

[@Lawtina2023]

Found this video super helpful! Civ Pro has been my weakest MBE topic, and this video has definitely helped me narrow in on my frequently missed questions and where I was getting lost. Going forward, I feel so much more confident, and I am 1000% sure after watching this video, my Civ Pro MBE performance will be greatly enhanced! Also, I have their one-sheets, and they are a lifesaver for my nighttime memorization routine! 1000% recommend on top of any commercial courses you already are using. I literally love all JD Advising bar prep materials, and I have been recommending them to all my friends! 10/10 recommend :)

[@JDAdvising]

Thank you SO much for your comment and for recommending us to your friends!! We are so glad you find our materials helpful :) Best of luck on the bar exam!!!

[@msmama2258]

I found your videos after my melt down. I’m enrolled in a program but learning the law from so many outlines has been slow. Ordered your One sheets & can’t wait to start!

[@JDAdvising]

Thank you so much for your comment! So sorry you had a melt down (that happens too often during bar prep!). We hope you LOVE the one-sheets!

[@psalmistmarcias]

Exceptionally helpful. Thank you very much

[@JDAdvising]

Great to hear! Thank you!!

[@amrsalah4]

Thank you so much

[@JDAdvising]

You're most welcome!

[@Foohh]

Thank you so much! You just helped my understanding further.

[@JDAdvising]

I'm so glad! You are very welcome!!

[@kyle9380]

So is Erie for procedural and klaxon is for substantive law? They seem to get mixed in with each other.

[@JDAdvising]

Great question! I guess you can kind of get to that result, although it is not quite that simple. Erie applies when a federal court (which has diversity jurisdiction) is deciding between state law and federal law (when state and federal conflict, which should be applied). Klaxon is relevant when you have a federal court (which has diversity jurisdiction) that is faced with the choice of whether to apply State A's law or State B's law. And it is likely only going to be applying state law to substantive issues, hence why Klaxon will be relevant more to substantive issues. But the main difference relates to what the conflict is: state vs. federal or state v. state. Both rules have the same goal though: trying to guarantee that the federal court is reaching the same decision that the state court in that same state would so that there is no forum shopping opportunity for a plaintiff that is trying to decide between filing in state or federal court. Great question, Kyle. Good luck studying!