Professor James Duane shares some helpful tips on the law of hearsay for the bar examination.
Пікірлер: 178
@psimos65727 жыл бұрын
I'm happy to see everyone is saying the same things. I feel so cheated. This professor is the best. I truly would have enjoyed law school and bar prep more if he was there. I paid 2500 for a program and this guy is making quality videos for nothing. (More people should be benefiting!!)
@rvegas815 жыл бұрын
I agree. Some of these videos do a great job of helping to supplement bar prep programs!
@WILMA_4 жыл бұрын
- couldn't agree more!
@ronmaritvold22973 жыл бұрын
J
@michaelfulton89722 жыл бұрын
I have no intention on taking the bar exam. I’m just an insomniac who clicked on this video at 3:34am.
@missfit49432 жыл бұрын
@@michaelfulton8972 me too lol
@erikaostergaard-qqc-c25525 жыл бұрын
Unbelievably helpful! and actually fun to listen to -- who knew that was possible??? This professor is like the Attorney version of Mister Rogers!
@sconnell17913 жыл бұрын
He is genius Bugs Bunny on Speed lol. Just try having him in class.
@darliheanacho94613 жыл бұрын
This Professor should teach every bar course and subject.
@bryanandrews7391 Жыл бұрын
This man is a hero! I wish he did more videos. I feel like I had a good professor, but this man taught me more in one hour than I learned in 6 weeks covering hearsay! And the "hacks" to simplify questions saved me! Will never forget this!!
@ThatSundaySchoolGirl5 жыл бұрын
Where have you been all of my law school and bar prep life??? What a blessing this video has been! You should be making full bar prep courses!! #Awesome
@DanaLynnette6 жыл бұрын
This video helped me to finally pass the MBE!! Thank you so much, and God bless you!
@sofabkiki845 жыл бұрын
Congratulations!
@baba-ganoush4 жыл бұрын
Just this one vid? There’s 14 fields of law this A topic amongst many under 1- and that’s not to undermine the sheer importance
@lia.is.on.4 жыл бұрын
@@baba-ganoush You idiot! You're so consumed with trying to insult her that you failed to realize she said the MBE! The MBE does not have 14 areas of law, dummy! Don't you feel like trash now? Furthermore, any logically thinking person knows that her comment's intent was not to say she passed the MBE just by watching one KZbin video. Go straight to hell hater!
@baba-ganoush4 жыл бұрын
My comment was clearly a sarcastic one, the only person filled with hate is you. You just unloaded and projected probably a years worth of anger, hopefully it was cathartic. I feel no differently. Hands down if this truly helped you, absurd.
@baba-ganoush4 жыл бұрын
LegallyLia also don’t ever call me an idiot again i didn’t disrespect or name call or inject a level of toxicity so early in the morning on a vid of a dude playing the banjo, think about that.
@josephfayia91746 жыл бұрын
What a masterpiece! Thanks, Professor James Duane.
@rube19046 жыл бұрын
Agreed !!!
@daniellelsimpson7 жыл бұрын
Wow. .. I've never heard it explained so simply. I'm excited to get to these hearsay questions and answer them confidently and CORRECTLY!!
@anniecnt8 жыл бұрын
This was super helpful. The information is organized so that it makes sense and the pacing is very good. Thank you!
@cassandracooper856510 жыл бұрын
Perfect timing -- I wish the bar review courses provided these methods!! Thank you!
@rube19046 жыл бұрын
I'm not an attorney. I just play one on TV. I'm a US History Professor, and this is absolutely fascinating to me.
@stanh50763 жыл бұрын
He explained the practical way of answering the Hearsay MBE questions and a practical rationale behind. It takes someone who truly understands and sees the true law behind things to be able to summarize them like this.
@JMDarielle9 жыл бұрын
This was extremely helpful for bar prep. Thank you!
@meganbecker8 жыл бұрын
Wow, this is going to save me so much time and has given me a lot more confidence for my second go-around! Thank you!!!
@officergregorystevens57657 жыл бұрын
Good luck.
@meganbecker7 жыл бұрын
Haha! I totally forgot that I posted this. I did pass the second time, btw. 😊 Thanks!
@Babiscolo8 жыл бұрын
Lifesaving Professor. Thank you!
@burrujack3062 жыл бұрын
Professor, a million times, thank you. you made this subtopic of hearsay quit manageable. My level of understanding just went up by .>...%.
@arafatsa34795 жыл бұрын
So grateful Professor Duane and Regent University. Thank you!!
@djdarez23068 жыл бұрын
so much better than barbri's lecture on evidence
@LadyK0079 жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you for posting!! I am very grateful!
@semitavitae47295 жыл бұрын
Can this guy create and moderate an entire bar review course!?
@jaksbekalskkz19612 жыл бұрын
This is so well-explained I cannot find a better explanation video on hearsay. Thank you professor. Can you upload more teaching content regarding objections?
@petermcevoy26084 жыл бұрын
Thank you Regents University I love you.... passed MPRE at Regents a long time ago too. Great lecture Professor.
@shawnetuma10 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant -- just as I would expect from Professor Duane!
@daisyladyklg85384 жыл бұрын
I am appealingly my Criminal circuit court case in Wisconsin pro se and you had me at the 5th note of that song. When I tell people what my all-time favorite song is, probably 1 in 40-50 say that they may have heard of it. Lindsey Buckingham is a genius. Btw, thanks sooo much for breaking down the law enforcement report situation. That and quite a few others has helped me tremendously. ✌️💞
@HurricaneChise8 жыл бұрын
This was incredible.
@jitesg9 жыл бұрын
You are amazing. MAY GOD BLESS YOU ABUNDANTLY..
@soy_0scar73 жыл бұрын
May God bless and protect you!
@angelahamon67303 жыл бұрын
Professor has us all with his humor. What does the Fox say? Killer example! i'm not in school but I love watching this attorney on KZbin.
@sesanglovel6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! This was immensely helpful!
@poshaMillanbel9 жыл бұрын
This is Perfect ! this will definitely be very helpful for me in February ! Thank you so much.
@verajumah51942 жыл бұрын
I'm from Kenya and i just want to say thank you Sir for the video 💯
@johnclarkmartin6 жыл бұрын
I wish this guy was my evidence professor. So easy to understand!
@desireewatson72384 жыл бұрын
He is amazing!
@natashamatias45343 жыл бұрын
this has been so helpful, thank you thank you thank you!
@elijahhaar45846 ай бұрын
Professor Duane is a legend!
@SusanBassi2 жыл бұрын
Adore you, thank you for always educating and informing !
@natcalverley43442 жыл бұрын
This professor makes law fun. I love his lecture don’t talk to the police. I have made all my friends and children watch it.
@aangitano3 жыл бұрын
so so helpful for my evidence MP choice final exam! thank you!
@laurenfalkowitz11337 жыл бұрын
Wow, this was incredibly helpful.
@LindsayLane85 жыл бұрын
Perfect. This is where it's at!!! Thank you!
@moohaloful10 жыл бұрын
Amazing video and super helpful!
@shahidmahmood30519 жыл бұрын
perfect professor thank you and appreciate you for your volunteer help
@kashewesiyubo60644 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this information.I have learnt alot
@bench27603 жыл бұрын
This professor is awesome.How I wish I was under his class.It could have been easier🤩💜
@crackerjax43302 жыл бұрын
This was excellent. Thank you.
@AlexIsUber2 жыл бұрын
Amazing professor.
@tylerwarner69749 жыл бұрын
On point. Thank you!
@cheffboyaryeezy24962 жыл бұрын
I want to meet this professor. From his dont talk to cops video to this. He seems like the best kind of person
@carlosgoetz7185 жыл бұрын
this gentleman is awesome!
@illegallyblonde2324 жыл бұрын
Thank u ❤ I'll be taking this test soon
@fdt7v7 жыл бұрын
OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS!!
@amanihaddad3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Professor
@nataliem77809 жыл бұрын
Very helpful!
@garglinghermenstural8 жыл бұрын
this is awesome!
@andrewholcombe45652 жыл бұрын
"Can you tell us, what does the fox say. . ." - old meme lord Duane 19:52 lol
@rashdakhan83027 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@JCResDoc946 жыл бұрын
22:00 exceptions to hearsay as written (present sense/excited utterance/emotion, mental, physical condition)
@AllfatherBlack2 жыл бұрын
Internet legend James Duane. *salute*
@mc4ndr36 жыл бұрын
Interesting talk. Are these qualifications of admissible vs inadmissible hearsay specific to Virginia law, or are they just about applicable everywhere in US / federal law?
@hannahlauer2 жыл бұрын
Professor Duane, thanks much for the video! Quick question for you on something I am stuck on. Wouldn't the statement "I HAVE HAD pain in my back for three weeks" be considered present perfect tense (actions started in the past and continue in the present or the future) and therefore be admissible under the Then Existing Present Mental, Physical, or Emotional Condition exception? Whereas the statement would need to read "I HAD pain in my back for 3 weeks (or for the past 3 weeks)" for it to be a statement of a past tense memory or condition and therefore not admissible under the exception?
@luckyswine4 жыл бұрын
I foolishly thought my two favourite and separate discoveries at the moment were Professor James Duane and thumbpicking. Here I find the Alpha and Omega.
@ashkiek13 жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@joeysixstring24426 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!!
@officergregorystevens57657 жыл бұрын
"Never Going Back Again"? A lawyer and professor who plays Lindsay Buckingham guitar parts.. that's pretty awesome, sir. I love studying law just on my own,.. not even 'reading law' really because I doubt I'll ever get my J.D. or anything like that, it's just very interesting. Maybe Norman ancestry is what put this interest in real property law in my blood.. not sure :) [My ancestor was one of 20 men known who fought in 1066 to get William I into power, and then became basically the first 'land developer' of England.. ] :)
@amrsalah42 жыл бұрын
Does this Professor have any others videos or page or website ???
@brucedavid87357 жыл бұрын
hearsay is so instrumental in my life my song was as follows ""she told a lie""it made me wanna die"" but now I live with it for the rest of my life
@melisainfresnofelipecastan1632 Жыл бұрын
💥IMPECABLE👌🏼ABSOLUTELY APPRECIATED💥
@sbrenner25612 жыл бұрын
Beautiful D-55!
@raneenalsayegh2950 Жыл бұрын
THANK YOUU!!!!
@amandabumgardner27512 жыл бұрын
I'm a fan now since he played Fleetwood Mac
@donbush90914 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Msangel06 Жыл бұрын
Where can we find evidence practice questions for the bar exam?
@CameronPresident10 ай бұрын
This is high art.
@adaml29324 жыл бұрын
I have a question. 1. Anything said by a party opponent is automatically admissible. 2. What about double hearsay? Ie in the instance w/ Jeff, Sam, Carol, Pat
@oklahomaproud66653 жыл бұрын
The tune is Never Going Back Again
@anthonysclafani3963 Жыл бұрын
lol i recognized that Cornell font immediately
@danmorgan7122 жыл бұрын
At the 30 minute mark he uses the line "I have had..." as past tense, but this is present perfect and would include not just having had pain, but still having it. "I had..." would be past tense, meaning that statement should be an exception as listed.
@amandabumgardner27512 жыл бұрын
Oh it Regent no wonder I like this Instructor.
@devenwithtwoes58562 жыл бұрын
Did you do the lecture on don’t talk to police ?
@l.w.paradis21086 ай бұрын
Yes. That was great. A police officer then had the right of rebuttal, and he basically agreed.
@saizai7 жыл бұрын
30:14 "I have had a pain in my back for three weeks" could include the present too. So that's partially exempt as present, partially ? as memory?
@gkfamily71723 жыл бұрын
That is what I was thinking- Like " I have continued to have back pain in my back for three weeks"
@googlyeyes3403 жыл бұрын
In this context, there is no "partially" category: either the statement is admissible as evidence, or it isn't. It is in the past tense -- "have had" -- meaning for a period of past time ending just now. It is possible that the declarant intended to include the present moment, so it's correct that it *could* include the present. But that speculation would not persuade most judges.
@saizai3 жыл бұрын
@@googlyeyes340 That's not past tense. "I had a pain" is past tense. "I have had a pain" is present perfect. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/have#Conjugation
@saizai3 жыл бұрын
Also, things can be admissible for some purposes but not others - aka partially. Lots of that in the FRE. For instance, settlement offers.
@seanleeroy52395 жыл бұрын
I found the part about a persons statement who's about to die, or believes they are about to die being admissible somewhat interesting and a bit common sense...if you will. Then wondered, if the person was an Atheist, or known Atheist, would their statements still be taken as that of a known "God fearing" person? Thanks!
@googlyeyes3403 жыл бұрын
Yes, it would; the declarant's religious belief or lack thereof doesn't matter w/r the hearsay rules.
@withgoddess71642 жыл бұрын
My hero...re: Don't talk to the police. I watched it and am so glad I did.
@ljp94024 жыл бұрын
god bless you
@user-pp3bf3he1c5 жыл бұрын
what about testimony on hostile witness?
@JCResDoc946 жыл бұрын
12:00 "may be used against you" - you can not claim that things others claim to have been said by you are hearsay. If you acquiesce - that is the same as making a statement. Your agents all also speak as you.
@googlyeyes3403 жыл бұрын
You can object, on the basis of the rule against hearsay, to a witness's claim that you said something unless the witness's testimony is covered by a hearsay exclusion (e.g., party opponent) or exception (e.g., excited utterance).
@RavnerRavner6 жыл бұрын
sweet Guild.
@enteringthegrayzone40203 жыл бұрын
2 times in court I was guilty. Both times during my first appearance, I expressed my guilt immediately without legal representation. Both times my statements were thrown out until I received legal counsel. Both times I was guilty and received minimum sentence. Once I thought the judge was going to cry.
@kingofgrim47612 жыл бұрын
Why would u say it tjo
@JCResDoc946 жыл бұрын
9:44 declarant being present, under oath, does NOT mean it is not hearsay to repeat a statement THEY THEMSELVES made. That is still hearsay.
@christinamariehicks10782 жыл бұрын
I dont have instagram ..
@vlxxx3 жыл бұрын
This is is a very complex topic. Professor Duane does a nice job of easing its difficulty but the written info is confusing. Primarily the early info presented that was lists of wrong answers made up of positive statements that start with 'yes', weirdly. That's confusing, like writing a sentence with a purposeful double negative
@shivasirons61592 жыл бұрын
It almost sounds like any " confession" is hearsay, " tell me detective, did the defendant confess"? If the defendant DID confess but was actually lying when he did, what then?
@maranatha46137 жыл бұрын
exceptions and rules against hearsay evidence
@djjoshua0074 жыл бұрын
It would be funny if his Client went to jail for life and then he started playing his guitar like that
@peruanopr18 жыл бұрын
What the fox say?
@andreavilla54668 жыл бұрын
+Manuel Figueroa LOL literally all I could think about when I heard it.
@MiguelAJeffery3 жыл бұрын
51 people didn't pass the Bar even after listening to this video
@panagiotiskostastheoktisto67093 жыл бұрын
Truly I say to you seek and do the work of truth for the truth will never fail for you that holds to a future telling book seek true forgiveness wile you can
@GeorgeHawirkoStyroHome3 ай бұрын
Yes, I've heard of this theory... :-/
@mattlogue13002 жыл бұрын
Hi I just farted so hard the walls shook.
@evanhdez3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else not even win law school or ever planning too? Hell I didn’t even go to college.
@maranatha46137 жыл бұрын
plz I have exam tomorrow plz help me
@trollking61112 жыл бұрын
The only things that really matter are: A.) Have you persuaded the judge? B.) Does the judge fear that you will kill them for their dishonor? That's it. That's all that matters in a US court room.
@nemo-nb3gh2 жыл бұрын
for us mere earthlings: you have to buy professor Duane's book "the right to remain innocent "
@nemo-nb3gh2 жыл бұрын
It is better that 10 guilty persons go free than one innocent man be convicted and punished --Sir William Blackstone English jurist, judge 18th century