CJI Chandrachud & SG Mehta Weigh In On Wealth Redistribution During Constitutional Bench Hearing

There was an interesting conversation between CJI Chandrachud and the solicitor general during a constitution bench hearing on 30th April, in which the topic of wealth redistribution which has been at the centre of a political faceoff between PM Modi and Rahul Gandhi came up. SG Tushar Mehta said that it would be rustic and juvenile to suggest that the nation's wealth could be computed by totally the wealth of all citizens, and then re-distributing it - something that the 9 judge constitution bench headed by CJI Chandrachud seemed to agree with. This came up while the constitution bench was hearing the process of interpretation of article 39(b) of the constitution, which basically allows the government to acquire and redistribute privately owned properties if they are deemed material resources of the community. Watch!
#rahulgandhi #justicechandrachud #supremecourt
Want to make your money go further & work harder for you? Here are 20 Personal Finance Strategies from Mint. Check out our new coffee table book authored by Neil Borate & the Mint Money team. Download your digital copy here! shorturl.at/dDUV1
Mint is an Indian financial daily newspaper published by HT Media. The Mint YT Channel brings you cutting edge analysis of the latest business news and financial news. With in-depth market coverage, explainers and expert opinions, we break down and simplify business news for you.
Click here to download the Mint App
livemint.onelink.me/MrDS/p0kx...

[@varadharajanranganathan3761]

RaGa has no idea of how difficult to earn a monthly salary. An unemployable bum. Obviously he comes up with such bizarre ideas.. and we waste our precious time, discussing this..

[@ronwilson5075]

Rahul Gandhin never said anything about wealth redistribution. Please do a 'fact-check'. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqTNhq2plLl5npo

[@sakalasiva]

If you don't discuss today, tomorrow Congress may come to the power and do exactly same then you will have all the time to discuss about impact of it in addition to poverty. So you want to discuss now and make country aware of its negatives or experience it and then talk about it.

[@GururajBN]

We have to discuss because there are a few crores of pappus in India who have been regularly voting for congress.

[@sr2.044]

However, the bizarre idea is we should promote discussion as many people like RaGa don't have the common sense to think more broadly.

[@yoganandmantravadi1993]

See how many pappu sit at home without voting Their wealth should be taken away

[@pubgaf3356]

PAPPU needs to go back to Thailand again to recharge his last 2 brain cells

[@soumyapramanik1891]

Nehi Thailand mein Jake itne moj karenge ki last 2 brain cells fused ho jayega

[@gopaakrishnanmvenkataraman9129]

One needs brain to have cells in it

[@harshildhaduk3766]

Is pappu having brain. I doubt it😂😂😂. Shame on Congress.

[@vasudevabhats1600]

Pappu, and Brain ? 😂😂😂

[@NeuzEmo]

My neighbour name is PAPPU😝😝😝😝😝

[@SantoshSinghal-rz7gb]

Hindu earn and congress distribute hindus money to in muslim only

[@mrshah2832]

Bro when did government distribute wealth we are paying tax on each and every thing.

[@user-vf3sh2jh4z]

Kya pagal panti hai😂😂😂Kuch Bhi ho Hindu -Muslim

[@Sam-dd1he]

​@@mrshah2832first go and read about WAQF ACT. Land ownership to pehle hi ja chuki h jwellery hi bachi h bas😢

[@atntaltd]

@@mrshah2832 government giving salary to MAULANA , taxing mandir bur mosque is tax free ? inequality right there , lets redistribute WAQF property built schools , toilets and hospitals

[@atntaltd]

@@mrshah2832 9cr toilets ? who is using it ? dalit, muslims are the prime beneficiary , this is were your taxed money is going

[@bose6483]

First khangress should return the money they have looted for 65 years from our nation .

[@amangadpale9284]

Which Money

[@saptarshiadhikary3736]

​@@amangadpale9284 corruption money maybe.

[@sakshamsinhax]

​@@amangadpale9284corruption like 2G scam ,coal scam ,bafoi scam.....

[@uditkumarsingh202]

@@amangadpale9284 Starting from Army Jeep Scam.

[@user-ts5dq2kk3m]

Ask your father raga​@@amangadpale9284

[@gagswag]

Wealth distribution sounds like a screwed up concept...it is not fair to take others hard earned money and distribute to someone else. Enough opportunities and discounts are being given to SC, ST, OBCs to improve themselves..

[@sakalasiva]

Sorry this money is not to distribute among sc,st,obc rather collect from all Hindus and give it to Muslims. Remember Manmohan Singh golden words Muslims have first right on resources of India.

[@gagswag]

@@sakalasiva yes..that is also true..maximum favors are given to that community and yet they act like victims..

[@sr2.044]

@@gagswag They always act like victims in a democracy until they are significant in number after that they will do everything to make you a victim and lastly they will demand shiria law. If you think otherwise look up to Bangladesh.

[@pipipupu5104]

​​@@sr2.044 what's happened in Bangladesh

[@Sangama333]

They won't be taking from anybody But They will make portions from the budget and then distribute I guess More like freebies from government a/c

[@harshildhaduk3766]

CJI is clearly saying respect privatisation. Government have no trees of money. Major portion of economic development is private investment. But shame on Congress. They will always criticise adani, Ambani.

[@jdsriharsha295]

Kuch kehna hai av?

[@moonku_1312]

Bhai ab Modi also criticizing what about that 😂

[@jhkblr2600]

Wealth Distribution was done in 1947 by Nehru through Zamindari Act. When CPIM came to power in West Bengal for the first time, they introduced the same and we have seen the downfall of Bengal since then. INC is now filled by jobless jerks of DU, JNU, SFI and they come up with ideas like providing reservations at secretary level jobs, reservations in private sector. Commie mindset needs strong strikedown

[@catfish9391]

Exactly I was going to support Congress. But now not anymore.

[@user-wb8ql4ky7j]

Your last para😂,,, is the real BIG truth,,which some people don't understand​@@catfish9391

[@abhaypatel4292]

Zamindari act was actually necessary very necessary and a really great way

[@jhkblr2600]

@@abhaypatel4292 and its bad economics. Small farmers did not and could not take benefit out of land holdings as they were very small. Units Economics could not work out and they remained poor and more marginalised.

[@noobgamer-xl3jk]

​@@abhaypatel4292 It was actually necessary at that time but doing it now will scatter our economy.

[@leelajaala6448]

Why the SC is wasting the national time on the stupid ideas floated by the headless chicken, I don't understand.

[@pankajsamanta1602]

It's important bro SC have to take the case and dismissed it otherwise if some day congress comes to power they will apply this rule

[@thatspp4503]

SC is validating what the majority of hard-working and tax-paying citizens think. Its important for the CJI to clear the air since the idea itself was gross.

[@georgecarlinn6288]

It is not stupid idea it is an cunning idea which is waqf act

[@prasvasu4217]

Thank you Justice Sir for shutting down this conversation. It is the 21st century; and politicians (leeches of the economy) can divide the vote bank by such junk ideas is honestly discouraging to see; especially in a growing democracy.

[@sierra_117rj]

Disband WAQF board, and redistribute its property to people needed cuz the property under WAQF is of government plus some private.

[@shivanepal1433]

Zimbabwe distributed land and is facing the agricultural problems

[@NeuzEmo]

Never ever going to vote for congress

[@Terabaap123.]

Capitalist theives.......

[@antareshmondal7157]

Why? Will you please explain sir? Jai shree Ram,Jai Hanuman, Jai Mahadev,Jai shree krishna.........,.........

[@amankumar-ob6sh]

​@@antareshmondal7157congress ko iss bar vote dene ka socha tha par jab se usne ye wealth vali bat boli ab toh jivan mai na du khangress ko vote

[@SUBWAYWALAGAMER-rt5kp]

​@@antareshmondal7157bjp is better

[@antareshmondal7157]

@@SUBWAYWALAGAMER-rt5kp chauvinism is not good for anyone.

[@WBSchoolOfMaths]

Man work hard to earn money and pappu want to snatch it and give it to the father of 10 children.

[@ismartshankar215]

That is why he is pappu idk why he is forcing peoples to vote for bjp 😂

[@amankumar-ob6sh]

​@@ismartshankar215bhai bjp hi thick hai kam se kam aise pagalo se toh acha

[@harshildhaduk3766]

USA economy Will collapse if Google,Meta, apple,tesla,etc will be out from USA or not encourage. Like that if private companies like TATA, Adani, Mahindra, Ambani,etc should also be encouraged. Because without all this indian economy will collapse.

[@Ajor777]

Why they wil be out, they are owned by Amecians.

[@SahilSingh-nx5yx]

Exactly and some stupid people are busy in hating them for absolute no reason

[@fact_tronix6993]

Bro but chronic capatalism nhi hona chahiye na dusra yeh chutiye congress vale jo Halla gulla macha rahe yeh toh modi ji se bhi jyada Ambanis ko uthane mai Lage Thai dhirubhai Ambani

[@TheBatman565]

See economic inequality in USA and India In india its too much compared to USA

[@fact_tronix6993]

@@TheBatman565 because India don't have that much companies compare to usa and china that why inequality is to much and for that level of companies India have to continuously built companies with fdi for over 40 years like america and china do

[@yourstrulytk12worldaffairs]

It's equal distribution of poverty not wealth

[@ChandranPrema123]

This is literally looting General Caste people and giving to illegal Immigrants from Bangladesh

[@amit6468]

I will not take your share of poverty. Why should I? I earn my money with hardwork, no freebies for loosers.

[@sh-chhotoo]

First Rahul Gandhi give Congress party to non family person

[@yourstrulytk12worldaffairs]

@@sh-chhotoo Are wo naamdaar hain... Unpe.prashna mat karo... Humari aukat nahi hai naamdar ko question karne ki...

[@yugeshncr3499]

Why should I engage with you?.....go and work hard man

[@vasumanu]

It would be utter stupidity to suggest that wealth should be grabbed from one person and given to other...it is stealing the labour of one and giving to another may be lazy person..utter chaotic , demotivating and devasting step is suggested..this is what maoist and naxalbaries are also suggesting

[@SM-sb9fg]

Exactly

[@pratapkurup1113]

That seems the idea behind the move, to distribute the wealth between a certain minority and tukde tukde groups

[@gauravg9810]

It is a planning to destroy Indian economy, congress is already taken over by China loving communists.

[@TheDURWAS]

Abe paap, My parents stayed a slum in Mumbai... They worked for the past 30 years and saved a ton of money, paid loans hence they have wealth. Stop mocking people's hardwork.

[@narayancrakshit2368]

Fantastic assessment by respected cji.❤❤ Rustic & juvenile R behold .......😊

[@lazydamsel]

Kya bole

[@kamalsh6123]

RaGa should put his theory into practice by first acquiring the wealth of the WAQF board and distributing it among the poor Indians of all faiths. Has he got the guts to do it?

[@ChandraPradip]

If this happens, mark my words, everyone who is earning well will leave India ASAP.

[@SnehaSingh-qw2id]

Everyone can't leave no. That's what is the challenge.

[@subhasiskumar6906]

Did Congress won the election? Govt formed? Why the hell is this being discussed on supreme court 😆

[@eklavyajain09]

They're just discussing about interpretation of Article 39 and this was pointed out by SG as an example.

[@vishalrao4073]

​@@eklavyajain09if someone is doing MBA and he gets any MNC job worth 12LPA or 25LPA, then if they will snatch all money from him and distribute it in few people who just did 10th or even who would be just 4th-5th class pass without any knowledge or experience....then why someone would do MBA or higher salary jobs and businesses.

[@eklavyajain09]

@@vishalrao4073 exactly my point too

[@gauravg9810]

This gives us social security that concerned matters are time to time discussed in Supreme Court. Discussion is an important aspect of Democracy.

[@BoomBoom-sc7ek]

​@@vishalrao4073reason for good scholars going foreign This politicians is not even get matured to take what action should be they doing politics

[@conscons5776]

who would like to GENERATE WEALTH if this is to be implimented... its a failed policy of many nations.. and many will invest abroad than in india

[@hrudairoshan]

You can never have equality of outcomes, so the govt should strive for equality of oppurtunity. So concentrate on public health, transportation, education, access to clean water and toilets

[@subhrajitgupta5535]

Jaya Pakash narayan?

[@atntaltd]

@@subhrajitgupta5535 old days are gone

[@atntaltd]

@@subhrajitgupta5535 if you talk JP look at bihar where it is right now ?

[@chaitanyavelamala7268]

This sounds like something JP would say I meant Jordan Peterson

[@atntaltd]

@@chaitanyavelamala7268 yeah lots of western shit is gona come our way , we need desi JPs , like J sai deepak

[@GururajBN]

Income and Wealth survey and its redistribution is juvenile economics. What else can one expect from the wise men of congress led by Rahul Gandhi? The idea seems to be “If we can’t lift the poor, let’s pull down the rich.”

[@kantvx]

CJI speaks of “We” and “Policy” in the same sentence and there goes separation of powers in our republic.

[@IM_NO_BODY_]

Why court giving their precious time to discuss about even when things not executed till now and also remake of RAGA in broader interpretation, And why court have enough time to discuss about even so many important case still pending please be focused on these cases

[@arvinbhat8921]

So were you against SC discussing on NRC when it was not executed.

[@castiel1115]

What broader interpretation? It is explicitly said who will lose wealth and who it will go to, in their speeches. Also the opposition moves to court if Modi didn't shower for one day. Is this a one-sided judiciary?

[@Kaafiristani]

Brilliant just brilliant. Justice Chandrachud won a new fan in me. The Russia Dictated policies, like nationalization, 5 year plans, high taxation on entrepreneurship kept us in Ration Ki line, only after we adopted the US's free market economy model in 1991 did we prosper.

[@sachbol3912]

REFORM JUDICIARY SO THAT BUDDIES WHO HANGOUT DONT CORNER AND HIJACK THE SYSTEM. THE SAMEVUNCH OF LAWYERS ACTIVIST AND JUDGES HAVE BEEN GRINDING THE SAME SET OF ISSUES THAT DONT SERVE NATIONS INTEREST BUT SERVE VESTED INTERESTS. A COMMON MAN SUFFERS DEPENDING ON DILAPIDATED JUSTICE SYSTEM AND LAWS. NO ONE FEARS LAW NOR RULE OF LAW

[@ashokp1027]

Give ur weath to whoever u want don't think about others , we pay tax our whole life .after death whatever left is for our family not for some unknown fellowa.they have produced 10 kids and it's their responsibility to take care of them not us

[@madhavant9516]

Let congress party and its leaders distribute all their wealth to whomsoever they want. That will be a good start.

[@dr_sriraviteja]

Forget entire Nation, this kind of logic wouldn’t even be applied to a Family! The fact that this thought is even being discussed in 2024 is scary. Where r we going as a country n society?

[@Madhugargeya]

In such case i will eat all my wealth before i die. Also i will ensure i will not spend money in this country

[@abhijitksinha8296]

Extreme left, generally left and generally right, extreme right is the process. Now we are generally right.

[@ShashankSingh-hb8uf]

4th june ko public karega vote distribution....😂😂😂😂 pata chl jayega

[@funtimefunny2153]

Even this super woke cji is bemused

[@anantsaini]

Long Live Free Market Capitalism! Socialism Haye Haye!

[@senthilkunnur]

Congress should their policy in Karnataka first

[@mandarp9472]

Individual wealth or assets are not for public consumption. Government already taxes everything using GST, Capital Gains Tax, Securities Transaction Tax, Customs duty, Service Tax.

[@kalyanchatterjee1617]

Guru, Mr Ram Churis and Disciple Rahul Bangles to note this observation.

[@fawa.z]

Wealth distribution will be immoral. Creating systems of spending on social causes will be more beneficial. Better schools, hospitals, good infrastructure. These are also wealth.

[@jrelax8236]

Kamaye koi aur khaye koi...where is the incentive then...socialism is a regressive philosophy...aaj ka Bharat needs capitalism with a degree of socialism...to move ahead...Nehru regime experimented a lot with socialism and enough of that pls...

[@Wiggie_Wiggie]

It's a common sense. If you take all the wealth from Ambani, then how will he pay salaries to millions of Indians working in refineries, telecom, reliance marts , trends etc. How will they maintain profit and how will they expand? This is the most disastrous idea a government can think of. In odisha the govt has started giving rice to poor people at rs 1. This has made them so lazy that they don't want to do work. They have no will to get rich , they know that they have enough money to feed their generations because they have thousands of rs 1. 😑 This is the reality.

[@Indobachi]

Reservation is one part of this idea Becoz of that some people have birth privileges to own a luxury without earning it....

[@atultejaswi22]

After becoming rich , have guts to leave reservation

[@Sanatansister5623]

They will give the right to the wakf board to claim and occupy any property without allowing the owner to go to the court and file a case. But whenit comes to distributing resources they will not touch those 7 lakh crore of wakf lands

[@krishnabhagath2405]

Waqf board was allowed and made legal by khangress leaders so u don't u ask this question to khangress and the supreme court judge who made this as legal

[@Sanatansister5623]

@@krishnabhagath2405 This is a question mark for Hindus, who never protest against such atrocities against their community, that's why Khangress was able to rule the Country for 60 years

[@soumengorai8346]

​@@Sanatansister5623i know secular hindus have fault but Supreme Court can also remove it because people don't interested in any type of politics 😁

[@Sanatansister5623]

@@soumengorai8346 Supreme court cannot remove any law, ite should be done through the Parliament. Supreme court will only follow the law from the Constitution and unfortunately the Constitution of this Country is Anti Hindu

[@Sanatansister5623]

@@soumengorai8346 Supreme court cannot remove any law, ite should be done through the Parliament. Supreme court will only follow the law from the Constitution and unfortunately the Constitution of this Country is Anti Hindu

[@DEVENDRASAGARMAHTO]

It is very easy to say distribution of wealth among people equally which is a difficult task.

[@santoshbannur]

What's the role of Judiciary in this. Why is Judiciary getting into politics..?

[@cnxindustries3276]

Surplus law needed once again in every way

[@RK-es8oj]

Yes, start from supreme court lawyers, they were drawing 25 lakhs per hour.. as fee... then people of India will appreciate.....

[@meenusharma2288]

This video should be viral

[@gopaakrishnanmvenkataraman9129]

To create incentive for be idle or lazy is not the job of govt . Welath is respect earned not a gift of govt nor anyone Pride of nation and being prowd to contribute to nation development is one and the same

[@SM-sb9fg]

Taxes are being paid for the same purpose. Higher income higher tax..simple logic 🤔 how come big people are missing this?

[@hansvonmeinstien3660]

Robert vadra worth around 2.1 billion and inheritance tax should be put on gandhi family first .

[@kamakshiyadav5980]

Already temples r taxed Middle class. Taxed Ab toh inheritance bhi taxed Pappu agar galti se bhi aaya toh tata bye bye

[@adarsh_mishra451]

Mai to iss desh se chala jaunga 😢💔

[@atul58]

If all the wealth of the world is distributed equally amongst all, within a few hours some will become super rich and some will become extremely poor. This is the nature of human behaviour. 😂

[@eklavyajain09]

Yaha ek mahine ki salary kamane me halat kharab ho jati hai aur wo v baant di jayegi ab?

[@nickhartnet4192]

Why are we tax payers having to pay for this nonsense, let Rahul pay for the court's time

[@Mhmdwazpedo21]

Ambedkar ji wanted complete exchange of population after partition. He even compared muslims to german dictator. Ever wonder why?

[@Sagar_Retwal]

I am brahmin from the poorer sides. My family does not own any lands. If I get fraction of wealth from adani who is a jain (minority) or Yadav's (OBC) Owaisi and Pataudi (Muslim minority). I don't mind voting for congress infact I will be the first to vote. who would want to work hard when you generational wealth and power like my dear idol Raga.

[@ismartshankar215]

Conceptually you are wrong because there is more jobless peace full people with 10 to 20 member in a single family ,so if this fking redistribute happens you didn't get a single penny infact your hardwork money goes to the uneducated jobless peacefull peoples Have some morals if you have guts then go outside do hardwork earn money income should be directly proportional to your hardwork only

[@vidyamadamanchi7091]

But they worked hard to get their wealth. You can do the same

[@arohik1901]

According to you success belongs to everyone, everyone have right on its wealth, but failure belongs to individual. If a person default on their loan , no one will try to help him or her. But that person becomes successful, everyone start hating and want share in it.

[@adarsh_mishra451]

​@@arohik1901sister ,,, understand sarcasm 🫂

[@adarsh_mishra451]

​@@vidyamadamanchi7091 Our constitution can allow caste politics,,,reservations ,,, subsidies and schemes to a special group ??? Just because they are marginalised ,,,,,so this is also possible if congress wins 💪🏻🔱

[@t1621]

*Every Khangressi wants wealth distribution. They want everyone's wealth to be distributed except their own.* 😂😂😂

[@krishnanvc5767]

Why are we becoming so stupid. Discussing and wasting time on a stupid idea taking Bharat back to the dark ages. WE DO NOT NEED A POL POT REGIME.The SC should THROW OUT THIS CASE.

[@vidyamadamanchi7091]

But the efforts are different right ? Somebody has put lots of effort, blood and sweat into wealth creation and somebody just sat and got wealth. So something very stupid is being discussed

[@hrishikeshsarkar6513]

No businessman, no startup company will work hard when the Government distribute their money randomly. Even common people will be lazy. Instead of this, government should make policy on salary and tax slab for low and middle class people.

[@saamywaad]

Here people are talking about st, SC & obc and not even considering the ews reservation. 😅😅😅 As a court you do not have right to decide political economy of Bharat. Are you an economist?

[@13rohitv]

Wealth distribution from government employees & politician, that includes judicial department also will be perfect

[@s.t.chandrasekharbabu132]

Equitable wealth is different from equal wealth.

[@judewarner1536]

The problem is not so much Wealth distribution as it is Income distribution. There are HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS whose incomes are so low that they can neither actively engage with the country's national economy nor contribute to it. This actually inhibits the growth of businesses and thus reduces the potential GDP and the country's wealth to the DETRIMENT OF ALL.

[@girishpai4538]

Does Raga know how hard it is to make wealth to Redistribute it why doesnt he redistribute his wealth of 10000 crore

[@PinakiGupta82Appu]

Wealth redistribution is a complex and potentially challenging policy to implement. It is a bit extreme, a recipe for disaster. There have been historical examples, such as in the Soviet Union under Stalin, where the state sought to abolish private property and seize the means of production through communist policies. In a communist system, the state owned everything, and individuals were expected to align themselves with the state's ideology, with no room for other political or religious beliefs. There was no discrimination as long as one aligned with the state's communist views. While this approach may have worked for a time, it raises concerns about individual freedoms and the potential for the state to essentially "enslave" its people, reducing them to mere cogs in the state's machinery. The motivations for personal development and progress could also be stifled in such a system. Once I had a conversation with a Bangladeshi person in 2019. That person asked me why India cannot get out of the labyrinth of sect politics while Bangladesh can do away with reservations. I explained to that person what is possible in Bangladesh due to its demographic composition is not currently feasible in India, at least at the moment. However, one thing must be kept in mind implanting a policy in a socialist democracy and partially capitalist country by grabbing it from a communist regime of a particular era in history will not be effective. In a more democratic and mixed-economy context, like that of India, the implementation of redistributive policies would be vastly different. Reservations, for example, are not inherently problematic in our situation, but they should be carefully designed and implemented based on objective criteria, such as financial instability, regional backwardness, and physical disabilities, rather than on discriminatory grounds. The benefits provided through reservations should be reviewed periodically to ensure they are still necessary and proportionate. The status of individuals benefiting from reservations should be periodically reviewed. Discriminatory reservations can create grievances and make certain groups feel marginalised, which goes against the principle of treating all people with equal dignity and respect, regardless of their background. People should be treated with dignity for everyone has equal potential, nobody is small. In summary, while reservations and related policies can be considered, their implementation must be carefully evaluated and tailored to the specific socio-political and economic context of a country. Blindly adopting approaches from communist regimes of the past, that too, after distorting the intent, may not be effective or desirable in a democratic, mixed-economy setting.

[@Chomusuke71]

This is a bit unclear, the court is discussing on the interpretation of the article 39(b) and not on anything mentioned by the congress. It was about the fact that India is moving forward towards more of a free market than a socialistic approach and thus the article should be interpreted in similar light. The discussion wasn't political but the video tries to make it sound political and that the court is condemning a socialistic policy by mentioning congress' survey

[@kamakshiyadav5980]

Congress needs to srsly get their priorities right

[@lokendrapushpad4436]

Articles 39(b) and (c) do emphasize the redistribution of wealth and prevention of wealth concentration, but they do so within the framework of a democratic and mixed economy, aiming to balance individual rights with social justice. This is not equivalent to advocating for communism, but rather for a welfare-oriented economic policy where the state ensures that economic inequalities are minimized and resources are used for the common good.

[@AnalystRK]

Congress should make example by donating its entire wealth to poor people. They should make condition that anyone who wish to join Congress or wish to stay in party should do by donating their entire wealth like Jain saints.

[@harip394]

We are trying to follow failed idea, we have enough time to debate but supreme court do not have time to dispose pending cases.

[@narayanjoshi9346]

CJI IS FORGETTING COMPLETELY ONE THING THAT GOVT INVESTMENTS AREN'T COST EFFECTIVE AND TIME BOUND IN PROJECTS. IN DEFENSE PRODUCTION L& T AND GODREJ ARE SUCCESSFUL IN EARLY DELIVERY OF ORDERS.

[@akapandeo]

Nobody is asking for a rustic way of looking at the economy , common

[@RaviIndranSR]

Even if the wealth is distributed the fool and his wealth will soon be seperated.

[@RafaelSoriaGarcia-gs8ud]

रखना एक बुद्धिमान निर्णय लगता है।

[@bharatbhandari8825]

How see idea is good but this kind of especially Rahul idea is more brutal and dangerous whelth will be distributed but not from india but from the other countries earning from export by products is the only possible solution

[@ashishpandey8537]

Cji also knows that growth can only be done via privatisation pr yeh saale bolte hai desh bech diya 😂😂😂

[@callmeYK]

Why the lawyer in background has something unusual

[@hrishikeshsarkar6513]

CJI is absolutely right.

[@AashraiRavooru]

All good and correct but why is such a philosophical case even being heard, do we have no other pressing cases. Sounds more like a podcast than a courtroom.

[@nareshshingote8081]

But we don't need courts to talk on economic issues, rather they should focus on solving cases

[@abhijeethatti9095]

Before this Let Pappu and His Party Leaders Declare Their Assets and How Much Part Is Going Redistribute It and Also Same With CJI

[@avd2111]

Even Pakistan agrees with Raga on wealth distribution

[@yourstrulytk12worldaffairs]

Show me the convo cut your noise

[@Existential_Bengali]

Progessive welath tax must be these, and the money must be reinvested in government free healthcare and education.... Supreme Court has no authority over public economic policy, supreme court judges must have public accountability.

[@theconfusedgod6866]

Bhailog sirf idhar hi aag nahi lagani hai. VOTE VOTE VOTE!!! MODI KO VOTE!!!

[@ajayahuja3339]

The new government first task should be to replace wakf act with a minorities welfare act which will fund all welfare actives and disbursement to all minorities and disadvantaged group. The uplifting of everyone will pave the path to bring parity and also phase out any reservations to anyone except economically disadvantaged people

[@sahibvirk]

Who the hell is a CJI to even suggest such policy decision to the Government that are not related to law at all. Even if I agree with his ideas but still. Today he is commenting on this policy tommorow he may give his ommentary on anything. How many such CJIs will we have to bear?

[@chinmaykapasia4806]

Tehata court nadia case no - ST -167-1 0/OKGI

[@rkrishnamoorthy1785]

My view is Congress party should declare itself a communist party and if people vote for it Communism will be the policy.Why beat about the bush.Taking wealth in excess ( what is the bench mark has to be defined and how it should be computed)from the person and give it to a poor man and how this poor man should be defined for eligible to receive that wealth and in what way. A pathway to Erewhon.( No where)

[@kartik5001]

The CJI is a smart man

[@nagraj2k1]

What is the need for background music in this video? The tiktokisation of media continues…

[@akashzz4347]

just when i think Rahul is getting matured...pappu will be back

[@PranabS.]

Well getting land of Hindus without civil war is impossible. This kind of decesion cannot be realise because from army to police hindus are in majority. There will be no India without them. As per as RAGA concern as soon as they do such experiment I don't think any from congress party from villages to delhi will be alive.

[@harshildhaduk3766]

CJI best answer that interpretation of article in constitution evolved as per nature and time we are living. Some laws and interpretation of 1950 will not work as per 21st century. So modiji want to change some laws in constitution. So vote as per statement. "survival of the fittest "

[@shreekr69]

No issue wealth distribution can start from sonia gandhi and other congress leaders

[@RaviKiran-lx2kw]

Pappus has20 crore immovable asset.. Let's acquire it first

[@smitaghia443]

We are living in free India..dont dump laws on tax payers.