Classroom Dividend-Growth Stock Portfolio 22.58% Per Year, Hi-Yield Portfolio 44% Annualized-Week124

[@ytofjt7823]

Great as usual. Don’t stop updating your portfolios; I do honestly learn a lot from your videos!

[@RexJacobsen]

Thanks, YT!

[@misterbeach8826]

I am keen to learn about the valuation formula you are teaching. DCF, Graham, Lynch, or some special score system? For instance, I came to the same conclusion on CMCSA, ALLE, IPG, CI, SWKS, but my formula valued MA, MSFT, V, FDS, PZZA, APD, and NKE as overvalued, especially APD. Therefore, I would highly appreciate an intro to your model and formulae? As it is interesting to see what rates you use, how you discount. Just curious. Oh, and: It is a fantastic idea to teach students investment this way.

[@RexJacobsen]

When trying to determine if a stock is over or under-valued, we want to make sure that our methodology is looking at the company’s future and not ONLY the recent past. This is so we can avoid buying a company whose business is about to tank. For example, if a drug company’s main source of profits is a single drug and that drug is going to go off patent, simply looking at the company’s Price-to-Earnings ratio won’t give you a warning sign. So we don’t use a simple formula that looks at past data to determine if a stock is undervalued; we need to look into the future which involves making estimates. And that’s where utilizing the time and effort of “trusted” analysts comes into play. Their full time job is to look at each individual company’s future outlook, something we obviously can’t do since we start with a database of 6,700 companies. And I say “trusted” analysts because many analysts are NOT independent and are simply courting companies with “buy” ratings on their stock in order to earn that company’s investment banking business (one such analyst company notoriously has a “sell” rating on only 0.4% of the stocks that they cover; when everything is a “buy,” then that company’s ratings are worthless). We are always tweaking our methodology, but for valuation, we use the target prices of independent analysts (preferably multiple analysts employing multiple philosophies, such value and growth-at-a-reasonable-price) and combine that with the company’s risk profile to determine the company’s margin of safety (ala Warren Buffett and Benjamin Graham). Margin of safety is important because we’d rather invest in a low-risk stock that is 10% undervalued rather than a high-risk stock that is 13% undervalued. And of course, from there we do a deep dive into the company’s accounting practices to look for red flags/accounting irregularities to hopefully avoid frauds like Enron. And we look at dividend sustainability, growth potential, buy-backs, etc.

[@misterbeach8826]

@@RexJacobsen Wonderful. I'm amazed at your effort in teaching them a detailed analysis. I'm pleased it's not just DCF, EV/FCF, or some Graham number. I googled your name and discovered BeatTheStockMarket and that you are an actual professor? Great. Nice to meet you. ;) A little surprise I didn't see coming. I would be very grateful if you could/would like to share more analysis information and theories occasionally on KZbin. You have a new follower. And I am more than keen to see how your portfolio will perform the next 12 months should the market tank for a while again.

[@RexJacobsen]

@@misterbeach8826 Thanks, I'm also fascinated to see what its performance will be during the next bear market.

[@aspectsman9919]

thank you so much for a good video.

[@RexJacobsen]

Thanks!

[@Ahmed-qk8fe]

keep it up hope ur wishes come true

[@RexJacobsen]

Thanks, Ahmed!