Climate Change is Here. Now What?

[@reaality3860]

No matter what we do mankind can not avoid the next ice age.

[@Patrick_Ross]

Mankind will have been extinct thousands of years before the next ice age arrives.

[@wolkenbummler]

I am living next to medieval wineyard, which is now much too cold for wine. How can that be? Somehow these people do not like it to show real (raw) data. I don´t belive a word.

[@wolkenbummler]

This modeling is closer to theology than to science. Science is very simple. It is all about data. And the raw unfiddeled data do not support the claims made by these guys. A hypothesis which does not fit to the data is simply false. And all predictions made by these modellers have been wrong so far. Spending tax money on this nonsense is fraud and should be persecuted as such.

[@wolkenbummler]

Devoti I do not blame these poor scientists. They are only tools. They did not find a good job in industry and have to scratch a living by doing this nonsense. I blame the decision makers behind these poor guys. And in the end when the hoax is exposed the decision makers will excuses themselfves by saying "I am not a scientist, I belived these scientists.". These poor scientists are traped in thier net of lies. I know what I am talking about. I studied physiks and Chemistry. I am working for more than 20 years as a scientist in the chemical industry and I see how my old friends which stayed at the universty have to stuggel for research funds.

[@wolkenbummler]

Based on your last answer, I assume that you have no scientific background at all and you have not the ability to understand even the most basic physiks and chemistry of this issue. This makes you an easy prey for this propaganda. In case that you have not the time to go into the basics of physiks and chemistry, check the original data against the claims made by these computer gamers. Or have a look at the climate gate mails. Even without any formal education you will realise that somthing strange is going on there.

[@wolkenbummler]

I don´t have to be a theologian to see, that theologians are lying to us. I realy enjoied our "discussion". Exchanges like this give me an idea how the green propaganda influences people like you. I am sure you are a good guy who feels responsible for the "world". I would recomend, that we continue this discussion in approx. 20 years, when we are deeper in the comming solar minimum. Meanwhile I will continue flying my privat airplanes and having fun burning huge amounts of fossil fuel.

[@strangemosaic2985]

Ignorance must be bliss, eh?

[@matthewstone1362]

How did mankind come out of the last ice age without human intervention? Without manmade CO2?

[@andrewvare3173]

It's about time. Young people are completely saturated with this despair. Completely.

[@williamjamieson9075]

Living on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean from Florida, there is no sea level rise here I thought any ice melt would distribute itself evenly around the world.why hasn't that happened????.

[@Patrick_Ross]

There are many reasons sea level rise is not equal around the planet. There are plenty of valid resources at your disposal.

[@mattdorsey2244]

@@Patrick_Ross Only an idiot would believe that. Wow!

[@drpsionic]

Anyone who says that "Society is going to have to X," is wasting their breath.

[@johnwalters6800]

The number 26,421 views is sad. If mankind was to have a future there should be 26 million views. My former heavy duty Christian wife and large heavy duty Christian family were all climate change deniers. I feel this is a reflection of why mankind is doomed. They will do nothing until climate change firmly hits them in the face and then they feel their only option is to pray for the second coming. Clueless people terrify me.

[@sodalitia]

Sustainability means bargaining. The patient is terminally sick and we are in the fifth stage of grief. There is no survival and keeping this economy at the same time. The sooner we accept that the better our chances of staying alive.

[@waynepatterson5843]

pafnucek --- Sustainability means bargaining. The patient is terminally sick and we are in the fifth stage of grief. There is no survival and keeping this economy at the same time. The sooner we accept that the better our chances of staying alive. Wayne Patterson --- Your behavior is delusional, because you are basing your decisions upon imaginary and delusional disinformation. Until you bother to investigate and discover the imaginary basis of the disinformation you are using as the basis for your misinformed actions, you will be responsible for continuing to delude yourself. Look at the imaginary source evidence.

[@jayhall7887]

Bill responds to the question of the economic impacts of reducing carbon emissions, sighting Germany and California as examples that have made changes and are still doing well. Both of these states are relative economic juggernauts that could perhaps absorb the economic mitigation of such policies, what about poorer states or nations? Developing nations? I agree that the future costs of not acting is something we must factor in, but what about the weaker economies now?

[@pensiring7112]

Make no mistake, Germany has not raised wages in 20 years, hast cut social spending drastically in the same time frame, and halved wages by introducing the Euro (prices largely kept their numerical values from D-Mark days, while wages did not), has neglected its infrastructure and is deeply in dept. Just recently, one of our last big turbine manufacturers left the country, and one of our most prominent steel manufacturers was bought by an indian company. Energy prices have risen extremely: About one third is just for funding renewable energy. Add to that the influx of some 1-2 million illegal immigrants, which will generate additional costs in the billions. So, "doing fine" is really relative, and none of those problems is solved by current policies regarding climate change, so I wonder how politicians will try to convince a populace that is growing poorer and poorer to invest even more of their money, that they don't have, into expensive climate-friendly technology. And disregarding all that, Germany adds about 4% of gloabl CO2 emissions. I forgot the number, but look at what China is doing and is projected to do, look at the projected population growth in Africa, and it becomes very clear, to me at least, that every effort that we undertake will at the best help a little, and at the worst help not in the slightest while at the same time plunging the country into poverty. Oh, and the "30% renewable" number is literally fake news: It was reached for a few days last year, and our installed capacity in renewables is already as high as our consumption. The problem is just that the sun does not shine for half a day, and the wind does not blow constantly.

[@jayhall7887]

That all sounds very familiar. I live in California... for now.

[@pensiring7112]

Yeah, I listened to a Victor D. Hanson talk about California and immigration. I've got no clue if he is considered a persona non grata, or on what point on the political acceptance spectrum he sits, but he sounded pretty reasonable, and his points very familiar.

[@vthilton]

Save Our Planet - Sharing, Justice and Peace for all.

[@warrenpeece1726]

Solution? Cost? Please show us the modeling that demonstrates the relationship between carbon taxes and climate modification.

[@deborahsailor7436]

Costs are not high enough for climate change yet.

[@johnoleary7519]

Expect 2 C above base by 2018 and 3.5 C above base by 2020. Have a nice Global warming Day.

[@andycroucheaux4568]

Wanna bet on that figure 3.5c (6.3F) by 2020 ? I bet it wont reach anywhere near that. Its going to get colder!

[@johnoleary7519]

Really . Tell me how. I might have missed something . Expect 10 C above base by 2025 to 2027.

[@andycroucheaux4568]

What do you call base ?

[@johnoleary7519]

Baseline temperature is based on pre industrial revolution temperature when CO2 levels were 280 ppm. Today we are at 405 ppm of CO2.

[@andycroucheaux4568]

I need temperature. Time & place. Thank you.

[@johng2075]

Economists suggest a three-step policy to reduce greenhouse emissions: 1) put a price on greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels; 2) return the money to households or do a tax swap; 3) border carbon adjustments. Here's the policy: citizensclimatelobby.org/basics-carbon-fee-dividend and here what everyone can do to make it happen: cclusa.org

[@mve6182]

I understand the earth's temperature has risen with 1C in 150 years. I assume this means the seawater has gotten warmer and has been expanding. I also understand that ice has been melting for 150 years now. Given this information, I would expect the sea level to have risen with about 1 meter (based on the explanation at 9:00). However, the real rising of sea levels in 150 years is about 30cm. Can someone explain this difference to me?

[@waynepatterson5843]

M V E --- I understand the earth's temperature has risen with 1C in 150 years. Wayne Patterson --- That is incorrect due to inaccuracy, because the Climate Change Alarmists have proposed a range of temperature increases greater than 1C; i.e.1.5C, 1.6C, etc. The total change in temperature over a stated period of time is always expressed by the Climate Change Alarmists as a fraction of a degree C/F per decade and for the total time period. The use of fractional degrees by the Climate Change Alarmists is one of the many reasons why their claims are instantly falsified in science due to the mathematical impossibility of using the original temperature observations recorded as rounded whole numbers of degrees F/C to subsequently compile the Climate Change Alarmists' pseudoscientific average expressed in fractions of degree which did not exist in the precision of the original observations, real and imagined. That is just one of many inaccuracies in the temperature data which are due to imaginary data claims fabricated by the Climate Change Alarmists. M V E --- I assume this means the seawater has gotten warmer and has been expanding. I also understand that ice has been melting for 150 years now. Given this information, I would expect the sea level to have risen with about 1 meter (based on the explanation at 9:00). However, the real rising of sea levels in 150 years is about 30cm. Can someone explain this difference to me? Wayne Patterson --- The discrepancy in the sea levels hypothesized by the Climate Change Alarmists versus observed is due to the imaginary temperatures and sea level data used by the Climate Change Alarmists to fabricate their sea level claims and Climate Change pseudoscience.

[@rosawilkerson519]

Aarastrettt at taaaeta😊sta

[@rosawilkerson519]

Aarastrettt at taaaeta😊wtwar area ts tete😊😊a Tete r Ateee sAtwater 😊😊ad ts ya 😊a a

[@Replevideo]

Wow. I'm not even going to watch all this video as the first speaker is putting out misleading information. We have not changed the composition of the atmosphere dramatically at all. It is still nitrogen 79%. oxygen 20%, Argon just under 1%, and trace gasses combined just over 0.04%. The most prominent trace gas is CO2 at 0.04%, up from 0.028% a couple of centuries ago. It is highly unlikely this tiny increase in a trace gas would be detectable from space. Just because people give an impression of intelligence, does not mean they are always right. All humans are prone to subjective opinions including the best educated.

[@dannygjk]

Moderator-you are verbose. This isn't an English literature lecture, it is science.

[@theevermind]

Now what? How about doing something other than myopically ignoring everything except CO2? The issue is the earth's net energy balance, and CO2 is only a (small) part of it. We can also affect how much energy enters the environment. We can change building codes in all warm areas to require white, heat-reflecting roofs on all buildings. These roofs send the sun's energy back into space without being absorbed, thus dramatically reducing the energy available to warm the climate. A "cool roof" can reflect 80% of the sunlight that hits it while traditional asphalt shingles absorb 80%. Cool roofs reduce energy consumption by ~30%, which reduces fuel use and pollution to produce it. Local temperatures (urban heat island effect) are reduced by several degrees. This one change--which doesn't require treaties, taxes, carbon markets, or extra policing--reduces warming, improves comfort, reduces fuel consumption, and pays for itself. Yet these folks don't talk about it because it isn't "carbon." Similarly, parking lots can be covered with heat reflecting canopies to provide shade, and floating heat reflectors can be installed in reservoirs to reduce evaporation and prevent warming. It's also shocking that if we really believe we're at a tipping point, why aren't we testing aerosols? Many experts claim we already have the ability to completely stop warming. Where are the experiments (or rather, the funding) to prove/disprove the claims? Those claiming it should be a last resort are like a doctor in a community ravaged by smallpox and polio holding off on using vaccines.

[@rayconlogue9221]

That you are not a professional scientist is evident in your observations about "earth's net energy balance". Your unfortunate remark that "folks don't talk about it because it isn't 'carbon'" reinforce my observation. I'll grant that you are correct in the limited sense that a "cool roof" is better than a black, solar-radiation-absorbing one. But the notion that covering buildings with "white, heat reflecting roofs" will reduce that kind of heating by eighty per cent requires documentation, which you don't provide. Your conclusion that "folks don't talk about" this solution because they are brainwashed by carbon fanatics takes us into the realm of denial and dishonest science. If you have evidence against my assertion, please provide it. As for aerosols, wouldn't it be great if that worked? But aerosols are dangerous.

[@WesternReloader]

The solution the overlords have in mind, is like a final solution…

[@SonicPhonic]

What is necessary is for arrogant deniers of climate change to educate themselves, stop spreading lies and behave in an ethical manner. We ALL need to adopt a Precautionary Principle which means preventing more injury to our Earth from mining, unethical agriculture, pollution and waste. For the climate change deniers, your opinion is uninformed, and no one is interested in your opinion, so keep your uninformed opinions to yourselves. I have much more faith and trust in the tens-of-thousands of scientists who have dedicated decades of their lives to research on the topic. When the Canadian government, Greenpeace and the Council of Canadians decide to work together on Climate Change, you know it's serious. I live in Edmonton, Alberta. North of us is the oil-sands where explosives blow up acres of Earth to mine soil containing oil. The oil is derived from the soil using water, with a by-product of sulfur. They have created mountains of sulfur. Next, the "oil" is shipped by pipeline to Eastern Canada, where it is shipped to ? This is insanity. There must be a better way of creating jobs. And we give Billions of dollars in subsidies to oil companies. Why? It's called politics. Politicians only care about there 4-8 year terms. This is the cause of Global Warming: Bad Politics.... And human greed.

[@hippiemike503]

Dude, what is the significance of who's at fault. Politicians have an agenda, deniers have an agenda, the polluters have an agenda. Ok, should they should be held accountable, but Artic sea ice cover is in decline; in Nov., the Siberian Artic Shelf is, as we speak, belching enough methane, an inarguably more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, to increase the atmospheric CH4 level by 1000%, and ocean acidification is well on it's way to destroying the base of the food chain. The trick now is to survive this, which will almost certainly prove impossible.

[@europaeuropa3673]

I trust Puxatawny Phil more than any Climate Scientist.

[@dwightehowell8179]

There are 30,000,000 cubic miles of ocean according to google and it holds vastly more CO2 than the air. 30 yrs ago Al Gore and friends started to make big bucks pushing global warming. Watch an Inconvenient Truth and see how right he was. By the way Methane is food to many organisms and has a half life in the air of 7 yrs. How long does CO2 really last in the air? Due to nuclear testing and the C14 it produced we know. It virtually all vanished in 10 yrs and you couldn't even find a trace of it in 20. Plants and other natural sinks grab it and by the way only a tiny fraction of the increase in CO2 appears to be actually due to burning fuels. The rest was due to warming. This may be too bad because even a modest increase in CO2 does wonderful things for plant growth. You have fun.

[@kevinmichaels6231]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iIvPenaaltx7iKM

[@kevinmichaels6231]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iaq4dXqceLN2Y80

[@pmcMatilda]

Best thing to do is give Fleishman and Pons a Nobel Prize for low energy nuclear chemistry and get fundin to produce practical products. Most important prevent monopolies in LENR.

[@zzebowa]

"the planet is in good shape" Enough said, because for decades we have been told that by now it wont be. Therefore you are saying they were all wrong.

[@ututura]

stop breathing and save my ears from this climate bullshit for a change

[@petergadd1358]

What about the amounts of methane gas which is in the artic which is melting? ????

[@howardwhite1507]

it can't "be here" if it's an ongoing process that is not independent of other processes...

[@curtjames1943]

Turned off when ca. Ecconomy good. Not. Peple leaving. 1% group. Small group pay 50% of ca. Tax. They are leaving. Why doesnt he say. Tax group is leaving . Polititions are making hard to live with too many laws .

[@waynestrode3954]

fill up lake Meade - with Bernie's/EPA - WPA north america - Fresh water pipelines… An infra structure idea...

[@mrcuttime22]

That's what I've been thinking. Water is HEAVY to send over a mountain, but we might wonder if Colorado couldn't SELL a bunch of snowmelt from the western Rockies to Lake Mead by a massive pipeline. Or maybe from mid-system of the Rio Grande... just when major supercells roll thru. It might even reduce flooding eventually. I need a better map, but if we were gonna build a pipeline for OILSANDS Canada to the Gulf. Why aren't we hearing about this obvious idea?

[@luisfelipe7351]

One little problem the paper seems to outrageous in terms of proposal...the speed of light that I used is faster than the speed of light...and the gravity speed is increases exponencially and decreases expnencial rate of 10 and 0.1...and just to show that the talk i not balloney...the earth is considered flat ( sorry ) equivalent if it had 631 degrees instead of 360 but the numbers round up precisely ...so if the gravity value is taken off...it does not sustain....

[@CreativeMerits]

Methane, TRASH and over usage not energy, energy production is the least of our troubles! before I get to my dollar burger at a fast food joint; I have a pound of trash to be discarded, cause is the issue that needs to be addressed here! stop, regulate trash production in the marketplace is a start.

[@Musicpassion418]

Eat fresh fruits veggies hunt fish..no packaging needed.

[@Ilovecoffee101]

In August some it’s in California

[@Ilovecoffee101]

Guys our dates were actually were not going to be assisted when we die And the lions were actually the dates were actually die in our dates will not always be assisted leg Henry February March April May June July August will not be assisting

[@goodtogodoug]

HOPEFULLY CARBON WILL INCREASE FURTHER AND WE WILL GREEN THE PLANET AND BASK IN THE WARMTH

[@Patrick_Ross]

You’ve never been accused of being very bright, have you.😂

[@A3Kr0n]

Seven years later it's still business as usual with the predicted results.

[@walkyourdog6584]

It is the rate of change that is main problem. Dont you see that it is too late when 70 percent of insects gone? You are still talking about modelling?? Get real!!!

[@accorddeparis4379]

Since all life including humans will be extinct in under a decade, why does Berkeley or anyone else spend hours talking about the past and present rather than the wild ways we need to test and deploy innovative mitigation to try to dodge extinction?

[@Patrick_Ross]

😂

[@MrTageamu]

We can see the difference fra space? Really! Al Gore is living by the sea in Florida :-)

[@luisfelipe7351]

Serious now...If I have a paper that is urgent to be guaranteed the authenticity of the publication...and it is ready...it prooves the necessety for the existency of imaginary gravity...all the numbers fit from begining to end...to prove a rule of definig or finding a imaginary number i had resort to astronomy and to physics so that the math can be validadated..along the way i steped into the gravitons but the paper is in portuguese...i am not related to a university right now...it is important to climate change computatiions.. the mathmatical formula can relate if a number was already imanginated ( converted to imaginary number or if it is a pure imaginary number ), the rule has been checked for an imaginary value of gravity and it holds with the gravitational constant number 6,67, if I take out the imaginary number of gravity that is used the numbers do not sustain truth... in many instances it rounds up to Pi-1 or Pi-2, I am not a physicist but a pharmacist and physician...I do not want to loose the credibility for the findings...it is a work that i gave up longer than 20 years and that I was iintrested to send to some one interested in checking without the securenness that the paper will remain inedit....can someone give me an institutional credible name for it? The paper was already averbated for registration of ineditiicity and one not ready copy sent to a journal of astronomy in the attempt to bring about the importance of these findings...if some one can help me please at CERN, send me message with an e-mail at my page....thank you very much...

[@Kelpy]

the moderator is trying to be way too glib. His snyde, humorously-intended comment about housing 200 million climate refugees in tents was extremely insensitive, and typical of a priveleged white male totally insultated from the harsh impacts of refugee migration on women and children. Just appalling. This is not Saturday Night Live or Letterman!

[@Stupidityindex]

Starting out with trying to be optimistic & pretend there are solution & there is something wrong with people leaving feeling down. It's pretty screwed up way to present doom.

[@rayconlogue9221]

Your thoughts about privileged white males achieve one thing: they underline your complete absence of information about actual climate science. You may be a nice person, but you need to demand a little bit more of yourself.

[@AS-cy1jt]

don't despair, we want you to leave feeling good about the catastrophe about to envelope the planet, what the ,,, a not so brilliant intro for those living in indonesia, bangledesh and coastal regions about to be inundated by major storms drought flooding, heat waves, your sounding like a religionist that maybe we can do something to change these events, maybe a group hug or prayer,, at the end will help

[@kl.johnny2232]

Its NOT CLIMATE change that we hv to fear, its the MELTING of the ice MOUNTAINS at BOTH poles!!

[@jamesday3957]

AT ONE POINT IN TIME THERE WAS NO ICE ON EARTH IT WAS A BUTIFULL GARDEN TROPICAL FORESTS WARM DAYS WARM NIGHTS IF ALL THE ICE ON EARTH WERE TO MELT IT WOULD ONLY RAISE THE OCEANS ONE INCH. DO YOU REALIZE JUST HOW MUCH WATER THERE IS ON EARTH. 2/3 RDS OF THIS PLANET IS WATER. THE EARTH IS A LIVING ORGANISM IT HAS SAFE GUARDS AND RESTORATIVE ABILITIES IT CAN ADJUST AND CORRECT ITSELF. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO FEAR FROM WARMING AND COOLING OF THE EARTH. ITS ALIVE AND WELL. THE PROBLEM IS WHAT ITS ALWAYS BEEN POWER HUNGRY POLITITIONS WILLING TO LIE CHEAT AND STEAL ANYTHING NOT NAILED DOWN FOR WEALTH AND POWER. THE TEMPTATION IS JUST TO GREAT FOR THEM TO CHANGE. THIER IS NO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE. A BIG SKY IS FALLING EVENT. MAKE BELIEVE. H2 O. 2 HYDROGEN ATOMS ONE OXAGEN ATOM WATER EXPANDS WHEN FROZEN AND CONTRACTS WHEN THAWED ONE SQUARE FOOT OF ICE TURNS INTO 1/2 SQUARE FT. OF WATER. THERE ISN'T AS MUCH ICE AS YOU THINK.

[@Patrick_Ross]

@@jamesday3957 - quite obvious you played hooky and never attended science class!

[@philosophy2051]

I made a crude calculation of the exhaust pipe area of all of the current registered vehicles in the world...a hole the size of Lake Pontchartrain (North of New Orleans) This is a large lake that can be seen from space.

[@mannyfreeesh5256]

I don't have a tail pipe. My car is powered by coal power plants because the solar and wind farms in my state is shit at making power.

[@Peter-nv3wu]

It's extremely difficult for anyone like Dr Bill Collins to be totally honest when answering questions relating to climate change and it's effects, if he were to tell us how bad things really are and what the future is likely to be from experiments he has run, it would not be long before he found his funding streams cut off, it would then only be a matter of time before he was unemployed and almost certainly unemployable !

[@svlonestar7645]

Foam Showers in High rise structures,,

[@richardnail]

This guy's optimism is based on one philosophy, 'do more with less' because he wants to keep the 'party' going..... what do I mean by party? The continued population rise world wide, he does not want to interrupt the irresponsible immense human expansion on planet. I do not want to live on a planet of his dreams, it is unaccountable stewardship of our ecosystem. I don't like the concept that everyday, when another human is added, I have to think about doing with less because some in the society believe no amount of population is ever enough - that is not intelligent thinking, it's moronic thinking. As usual this 'Berkeley' thinker will never confront the hard decisions facts dictate. Collins always comes up with another idea for a new gadget to keep everything going without any major change in social behavior. Renewables, right, he should check out the giant wind turbines laying over in farmers fields that will cost a million dollars to clean up (run cost in your super computer to calculate benefit of wind). This panacea to run to renewables is a absolute desperate attempt to not face the world we have created. WE CURRENTLY HAVE 6.2 BILLION TOO MANY HUMANS ROAMING EARTH POLLUTING, EXPLOITING OUR ECOSYSTEMS - LESS THEN 2 BILLION IS THE MAXIMUM # PLANET CAN SUPPORT W/O DESTRUCTION.

[@richarddao7054]

There is nothing you we can do! The world is doom!

[@ADEehrh]

Defeatist attitudes like that certainly aren't constructive!

[@mjimih]

Hey Kids! Read the KZbin Global Warming banner from Wikeepeedeeya first, so ya don't get confused!! kay? Weeeee

[@drpsionic]

Of course for those of us in the Midwest, climate change is a good thing. We get rid of winter. Florida and the seaboards are no great loss in comparison to that.

[@lovelygirl2141]

Are you stupid?

[@Ominousheat]

He obviously has no love for the deep south.Amayzing how the perspective of peolple can be connected to the land they live on.Ignorance posseses's no compromise in the human pshyce.

[@OnizukaKakashi47]

Do you not understand how seasons work? What causes seasons? Climate change or no climate change you will still get winter.

[@Ominousheat]

the equatorial latitudes don't really experience seasons.Winter isn't just shorter day time hours for the northern latitudes.Its a time when plants shed their leaves and animals migrate.As the globe warms these changes will not happen and the eco-system will and already is changing.I have a plum tree which is supposed to fruit every two years but now it is flowering every year and has even started to sruce twice in one year.Snow is becoming a rarity for britain and Greenland is melting all year round.winter is becoming just a word to describe the months of the year surrounding the western new year.As it is summer in the southern latitudes.It is not good at all.

[@OnizukaKakashi47]

bluegold21 Exactly thank you, my point (which was directed at the OP) is that climate change does not change the Earth's tilt or orbit. Winter is winter with or without snow. To say we get rid of winter is nonsense. January through March will still be significantly colder in the northern hemisphere and July through September will still be significantly colder in the southern hemisphere. Plants will shed their leaves later and grow back earlier. Animals will still migrate when the temperature is uncomfortable for them, their destinations will change however the direction will not. I absolutely agree with you and disagree with the OP, it is definitely not a good thing.

[@mannyfreeesh5256]

24:34 They're not burying their heads in the sand, they don't want to hear bull$h*t.

[@geraldspezio1373]

Multi-campus suffering & death???

[@jkovert]

lol

[@andrewmah5605]

Droned the None Believers. !

[@kimlibera663]

Phony alarmism. Climate always changes-there are external feedbacks from the different spheres. Pollution for the most part is anthropogenic. Pollution is not equal to climate. It can be alleviated, probably not all eliminated. Entropy is a natural law of physics. It forms in urban heat islands lots of which is created by the high traffic congestion in California. Note the co2 did not create the entropy. Laws of energy say energy conversion is never 100% efficient. The loss is in the form of heat. With regard to the amount of plastic, yes we are all slobs. Reducing plastic garbage will definitely keep space free in landfills & not so dirty the landscape. The biggest problem is plastic in the ocean. China just dumps theirs there. There are vacuum boats that can vacuum this up. Oceans & forests absorb co2. We will not have the runaway greenhouse effect that Venus does. Co2 still remains at 0.038% of the gas composition; it stays int his balance because we have large sinks. The rest of the stuff is bunk.

[@Patrick_Ross]

You skipped science class in high school, didn’t you?!😂

[@mannyfreeesh5256]

13:18 Busy getting paid on a solving a "problem"...