Climate Change Recalculated | Saul Griffith

[@psikeyhackr6914]

What has the annual depreciation of automobiles been since Sputnik? How has planned obsolescence affected that? How much CO2 in the atmosphere is the result of unnecessary manufacturing due to planned obsolescence?

[@donavonwayne1102]

pressure at deepest part of ocean floor possibility of causing plate tectonic and volcanic activity. Increasing volcanic ash in atmosphere... Could this be a negative feedback.

[@Jimi_Lee]

You could probably just calculate your footprint based strictly on your income or wealth without itemizing every thing you own and use.

[@matthewdolan5831]

Cyclical universe means eternal existence/ non existence cycles are feasible, even inevitable. Our 'long now' is about to end with an event horizon like experience as described by Andrew Glikson - the only debate is exactly when.

[@Praisethesunson]

As of today we are at 416ppm of C02 in the atmosphere. Our global rulers have resigned us all to 2.4 degrees of climate increase at a minimum.

[@busted276]

is this true ? Can you share a source ?

[@anthonyburton7189]

If you want to know what is is important to people or government then follow the money! People\ governments invest in what is going to be of importance to our future. That's why fossile fuel subsidy is the government investment into the next extinction event. It is why we will not tackle climate change! If we do it will be too late!

[@christinearmington]

Brilliant 🔥⚡️💥

[@hascleavrahmbenyoseph7186]

Reversing climate change requires that we correct the dictionary definition of profit and create a Global Economic Model GEM that fits well with the new 'profit' definition. I recommend the following dictionary definition of profit: "Profit = our gratefulness and loving care for our Environment, and for the sustenance that it provides to all of us". Clearly this definition does require a completely new Global Economic Model. The central part of the new GEM should be the EPA. EPA members will vote on the best 'Profit' definition that states sustenance is our only actual 'gain' without which we can't live, and states that the environment is our only source of sustenance. As the central hub of the new GEM, EPA members will establish, by vote, all directives related to both, the GEM and climate rescue strategies. Here are just some rough ideas of what the EPA directives might be: 1.) Population: Initially we need a one child per family directive. 2.) In place of income, jobs would have an 'equivalency rating'. Some jobs are still more important and more difficult than others. 3.) All equivalency ratings will increase at the same time if and when the environment becomes healthier. The lowest EquivRate must still be livable. 4.) Everyone who can work will be able, and required, to get jobs. No more expenses, so no more cutting jobs to reduce expenses; thus, virtually no more homelessness. 5.) No manufacturing of useless and unnecessary products. All products will be scrutinized by various rating methods. 6.) Whenever possible products should last a lifetime and or be easily upgradable, so we don't buy the same products repeatedly. 7.) EPA will direct "Work Force Flow". Example: Shoe manufacturer will produce 100yearLife shoes for 3 years, then reduce output to about 1/10 of full capacity, and the majority of shoe employees will be shifted to other work assignments by the EPA. Employees still keep their EquivRate in-between jobs. I know that this is just a rough outline of what we must do, but it's a good starting point. This is our Ark. Please help build it! Questions, suggestions and any comments for or against this idea will be very deeply appreciated. Thank you! 💖

[@Stupidityindex]

Everything is a lie. Peak global oil was expected around the year 2000, by math done in 1956. Greenhouse gases were expected to cause a crisis about now, by math of 1979. The State has no plan for you.

[@hascleavrahmbenyoseph7186]

@@Stupidityindex If we switch from fossil fuel to solar energy before we correct our behavior towards the environment, then (mass environmental destruction we have caused already) + (mass destruction that will be caused by creating the solar energy infrastructure) = (The end of life on earth). Our current behavior towards our environment is guided by "profit = income - expenses". This profit definition puts the entire environment, including us, on the expense side of the equation. Businesses want to eliminate expenses; thus, "profit = income - expenses" is a recipe for the destruction of everything. I think we need a new GEM that is based on "Profit = our gratefulness and loving care for our Environment, and for the sustenance that it provides to all of us". This is our Ark. Questions, suggestions, and any comments for or against the new GEM idea will be very deeply appreciated. Thank you! P.S. When you said, "Everything is a lie", I assume you mean that none of us is 'farting golden marbles', not even you or me... but is "Everything is a lie" also a lie? Do we need a new GEM or is that also a lie? You also said, "The State has no plan for you", but we are all 'the state' and this particular member, 'me', does like this idea for this new Global Economic Model as being the only way to get us out of Overshoot and end the climate crisis. Please be for or against this new GEM and please say what you do and don't like about it. Thanks! 👍

[@hascleavrahmbenyoseph7186]

These are more 'future EPA' directives that other members have recommended. Thanks to all of you! 8.) All recyclable items will be recycled. All stores like wal-Mart Target etc. will carry both recycled and new products. Recycled costs far fewer EquivRate credits. Items that can't be recycled as is will be reprocessed for other purposes. Virtually nothing gets thrown away. 9.) Teach us all, especially young students, how to manage the new Global Economic Model.

[@daysofourtime]

Lol

[@SuperTonyony]

#DEGROWTH

[@johnb8854]

The human influence on *'Global Warming'* , is the use and promotion of *ENERGY BASED TECHNOLOGIES* , as you are Dumping *Thermal Energy* Directly into your Environment, which accentuates change, having an adverse affect on all areas... You don't need to drop *'Technology'* , you just need to use *DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES, NOT* based on *"Energy"* ... To Discover more *Advanced Technologies* , requires you to Discover and Learn *HOW* to Access *"The Processing system of LIFE"* , and its Permanent Libraries for the answers.

[@lukebieniek9069]

Again with the Hoover dam. Ok lets go to China. I'm pretty sure we dont have time to invent a new country. Are you familiar with the compound word: brasstacks? Oh noooooooe hes driving again. Now he's cracking out the wine. Pie. Energy drinks. 😳 Wine. 👁👁 fusion☄️Citrion. 🚕 Next week.🤓

[@lukebieniek9069]

Watts?? Slightly humorous but nonsequitor. What do suppose is the average cost of time? Ok back to watts. Ashuming you have effectively changed the meaning of watts, why have you changed the meaning of watts??. Now youre talking: ACTION😃###oh no!! Its been a year already?🥴🥱😵‍💫