God set us free, mankind imprisoned us. The moral laws that God issued are restrictions that each of us should have written on our hearts from conception. Considering this….are the moral laws restrictions? Or are these laws for love, self, God & others? Gods laws are not restrictions but love.
@Meton2526Ай бұрын
That's just dogmatic nonsense. Other than your mythology book, what evidence do you have that 1) There is a God 2) That he's the God you think he is 3) He gave any laws at all What is your evidence? God's laws are not restrictions, they're fictional mythological nonsense.
@Meton2526Ай бұрын
And next time you get the impulse to preach in public, just remember "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites. For they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. Truly I tell you, they already have their full reward. But when you pray, go into your inner room, shut your door, and pray to your Father, who is unseen. And your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. " and then don't preach in public.
@YeshuaMessiah1225Ай бұрын
@@Meton2526 Evidence that you have rejected. Prayer that you do not recognize. Hypocrisy that you use as an excuse. Darkness that you love. Light that you hate. Preaching that you refuse to accept. For out of the treasure of your heart you speak. The evidence is in front of you, yet you are too blind to see. Blindness you have chosen, death awaits. For evil always asks for a sign, but they will receive none.
@Meton2526Ай бұрын
@@YeshuaMessiah1225 Blah blah blah, a whole lot of nonsense. You've chosen to accept nonsense as being fact. You have chosen to have zero epistemological standards. I have chosen to only believe in that which has real objective evidence. Of course I reject your idea of evidence, because it's not real evidence, it's dogmatic faith. Of course I reject prayer, since there's no evidence that it's heard by anyone, it's just dogmatic faith. I have no love or hate of darkness or light. They are simply the presence or absence of photons, photons that are emitted when an electron goes from a high energy state to a lower energy state. The conservation of energy means the energy emitted by a photon is the exact change in energy of the electron orbitals. Of course I reject preaching, it is by definition dogmatic faith that has no epistemological basis, and I've chosen to reject all such appeals to faith, and only accept things as fact when they have demonstrable evidence. You call me blind, but I inspect, I assess, I critique. You blindly follow your dogma without question.
@Meton2526Ай бұрын
@@YeshuaMessiah1225 Blah blah blah, a whole lot of nonsense. You've chosen to accept nonsense as being fact. You have chosen to have zero epistemological standards. I have chosen to only believe in that which has real objective evidence. Of course I reject your idea of evidence, because it's not real evidence, it's dogmatic faith. Of course I reject prayer, since there's no evidence that it's heard by anyone, it's just dogmatic faith. I have no love or hate of darkness or light. They are simply the presence or absence of photons, photons that are emitted when an electron goes from a high energy state to a lower energy state. The conservation of energy means the energy emitted by a photon is the exact change in energy of the electron orbitals. Of course I reject preaching, it is by definition dogmatic faith that has no epistemological basis, and I've chosen to reject all such appeals to faith, and only accept things as fact when they have demonstrable evidence. You call me blind, but I inspect, I assess, I critique. You blindly follow your dogma without question.