Siraj ud dullahs grandfather murdered his own Nawab and bribed the Mughals to become the Nawab of Bengal,Siraj in turn was betrayed by his uncle Mir Jafar who collaborated with Clive to become the new Nawab. There are no good guys ... real life game of thrones
@moonhunter982 Жыл бұрын
The British were the greater evils
@NasimulHaque-ry1th24 күн бұрын
Absolutely
@13strange673 жыл бұрын
The man for whom the phrase : 'embarrassment of riches' was invented.
@mspenelope6874 Жыл бұрын
The term is ‘nabob,’ from ‘nawab.’
@davidroberts88743 жыл бұрын
Well balanced, history should always be considered comparatively. Clive was a man of his time, not perfect but then neither was nawab
@keithferns62123 жыл бұрын
The land of Fagin..The Artful Dodger..Oliver Twist..in Charles Dickens novel.
@abhishekkhandelwal35822 жыл бұрын
What about locals who suffered because of him?
@edwardkenway17432 жыл бұрын
@@abhishekkhandelwal3582 My friend,they were the same locals who didn’t care about the conflict between the Nawab and the Company because of the distance the monarchs created with the people.Let's just accept it-Monarchy is monarchy.Only a few rules the nation,the people suffer every time.Clive was pathetic,yes,but the Nawab,or any other monarch, was no less monstrous than him,if not more.
@abhishekkhandelwal35822 жыл бұрын
@@edwardkenway1743 Nawabs at best fought with other kashatriyas but Clive and his rogues wreck economic havoc and made indians poorer than dirt.
@cezanneshaik36112 жыл бұрын
@@edwardkenway1743 if nawabs truly did the same things as clive did, england wouldn't have stepped into India in first place because there wouldn't be anything to steal
@mcchuggernaut93782 жыл бұрын
I'm always surprised that nobody takes the base-line corruptions of local leaders into account when weighing foreign rule that enters an area. Especially Colonial rule. Nobody bothers to say "Yes, they conquered, but did they make life better for the average inhabitant?". We look at the actions of the local rulers and their extreme cruelties and decadence, dismiss it, and say "white people bad" without batting an eye at the things that went on without any outside influence. Because it is "fashionable" now to do this. That doesn't really balance the books, so to speak.
@uberdonkey9721 Жыл бұрын
Because of modern left wing poltics. Everything now has to ve framed as anti white male. A shame, cos it takes away from proper history where we can understand people's motivations.
@ahxishwe5664 Жыл бұрын
'peaceful' academic😂
@arishemthejudge6780 Жыл бұрын
our anti-british sentiment makes us think that our rulers were angels. there was something wrong with india. a nation so vast and rich yet so incompetent that we got raided so many rimes. our rulers were incompetent and not far-sighted at all
@faisal.comilla.98 Жыл бұрын
Clive was a terrorist.
@arvind1311 ай бұрын
in the case of India atleast, they didn't make the lives of the people better, they made it much worse
@LastHussar1812 Жыл бұрын
So nice to hear a well-educated, unbiased person presenting a well-defined, impartial view of a multi-dimensional character like Clive.
@faisal.comilla.98 Жыл бұрын
Clive was a terrorist.
@joeschmoe218 ай бұрын
Lots of well-defined, well educated, multi-dimensional characters are arriving every day in UK, on small boats. They will all be Clives tomorrow, UK should welcome them and celebrate them. 😂
@owain69324 ай бұрын
Can't blame a lion for preying on rabbits.
@kicksomeup69982 жыл бұрын
Next up:- Hitler was no mass murderer, but a German military leader, economist, and self-made success story.
@denverbritto5606Ай бұрын
Hitler was not a good military leader or economist
@bharat71699 ай бұрын
He was a successful thug
@achalkhare39623 жыл бұрын
Another Indian origin historian, who is very keen to defend his colonial masters in a proper British accent to get some praise from the masters' community.
@julianshepherd20383 жыл бұрын
There is a good living in it.
@davidroberts88743 жыл бұрын
Just perhaps he is sincere in his view. I wonder how the change in regime impacted on the ability to prosper and personal freedoms of ordinary people. In a parallel universe of Ireland we always bash Cromwell. But for ordinary people the legal changes in status from a sort of serf to a Tennant could be argued to be a marginal improvement in leading to many personal rights and escape from tedious older obligations. There’s always many perspectives. The day we ditch Cromwell bashing will be a milestone in our growth of confidence as a nation. Perhaps it’s a bit like that in clives case? It’s an I’ll wind etc…
@malpreece50083 жыл бұрын
He’s actually quite original. Unlike Shashi Tharoor (with his ridiculously pompous English accent) and Partha Chatterjee (with his slightly cliched Asian accent) who continue to deride the British in India, without acknowledging any of their achievements. 👍🏻
@sivaramakrishna2693 жыл бұрын
A brown sepoy.
@timothydavy9683 жыл бұрын
Much of the history of the world is about one nation invading another and the cruel treatment of the conquered, this was completely normal for the times , I don't think that the British were particularly barbaric for the time, many in the western world seem to be going through a period of self loathing and guilt ridden hand wringing, for those who made disparaging remarks about the historian being interviewed, I am English born and educated in India, in my early years spoke with an Anglo Indian accent, a number of Indian colleagues of my father went to boarding school and then university in the U.K and had exactly the same manner of speaking as this gentleman .Britain should be proud of it's history
@runeguidanceofthenorse9 ай бұрын
Ummm yeah. From the occupier's perspective..."successful" but, ugh. Tyranny.
@barryobrien18905 ай бұрын
He was a nice but naughty school boy, who had a bad temper and quarrelsome. But he was not violent and a loving husband and father. He was a little worried about ending up poor so he amassed over a billion dollars of war booty in today's terms to make sure he did not go hungry. Obviously he was a good man. 9 million fammine victims unfortunately could not benefit from this. At least he could afford 4 mansions on England and ireland
@mspenelope6874 Жыл бұрын
Many British aristocrats such as Buckingham recorded accounts of the violent monopoly that excluded British business men, not just Indians, using criminal methods from conducting a civil life in India. He sent out personnel to be violent. This really is a misrepresentation, overly simplistic response and disappointing.
@ukrandr Жыл бұрын
I've just finished Robert Harvey's lucid and well written biography of the great man. Truly fascinating look at a giant and the times in which he lived and died.
@alinurmiah60386 ай бұрын
3 ships full of Gold were taken from king Nawab shiraj-uddawlah by The lord Clive
@AlanRaz8410 ай бұрын
Those time people live in chaos. War broke everywhere. Today we may just say Clive is bad guy but in those time who is strong, he is the king.
@edin-burgher28812 жыл бұрын
Isn't revisionism marvellous! The torygraph empire lovers will be delighted that Edgington has uncovered Mr "There is no evidence" Masini
@uberdonkey9721 Жыл бұрын
If Clive was black, the left wing would ne giving him posthumous medals. Seems painful to the left that white men are not demons.
@Pz21113 жыл бұрын
Please don't forget what he did to the Indians. What British raj did to the Indians!!!
@malpreece50083 жыл бұрын
What did he do? Deliver them from the vile government of Siraj ud-Daulah?
@kicksomeup69982 жыл бұрын
@@malpreece5008 India should deliver the Brits from the vile government of Boris Johnson.
@malpreece50082 жыл бұрын
@@kicksomeup6998 Perhaps they should! But then again, I’m not sure Narendra Modi is much better!
@theoraclerules50562 жыл бұрын
@@kicksomeup6998 : Maybe Rishi Sunak soon will do that?!! Then afterwards he can rescue India from Narendra Modi & his BNP Wallahs too?!!
@kicksomeup69982 жыл бұрын
@@theoraclerules5056 I think he can barely rescue his own appearance, let alone rescue India. Dude looks like a brown Jeremy Corbyn.
@julianshepherd20383 жыл бұрын
At the time Britain thought he was a thief
@bl00dhoney3 жыл бұрын
A vicious murderous thief
@Skymaster.47 Жыл бұрын
He was known as a vandal in rural Shropshire who ran a gang of protection racket targeting shop owners. Empire apologists have made him into a saint.
@theoraclerules50562 жыл бұрын
Obviously, a man who is ambitious & capable as Robert Clive was, was going to upset many people & vested interests either intentionally or incidentally! However, he was also a man of his times, so how can we two & a half centuries or more after he lived & in the places in which he resided & worked, hence impartially then judge him??!! Life, people, societies & their criterion of values from varying points throughout History were always very different, constantly changing & often contrary to those what are familiar & acceptable to us nowadays! Such comparisons are difficult to draw accurately, & raises doubts as to their serious relevance to anyone or anything! Consequently, it perhaps prompts one to thus ask the obvious question as to why should they then bother in the first place, to make it, at all?! For what good purpose, or else authentic knowledge would they glean from doing it?!!
@kicksomeup69982 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Hitler, Stalin and Mao were products of their time, as was Chengez Khan. Mass extermination was part of mainstream politics in the 20th century,
@philangezwitebethusi9364 Жыл бұрын
The problem with that point is that it seems to insinuate that corruption and cruelty were things that were acceptable in those times, they weren't! Now, Clive was a corrupt man, considered so by the Indians of the time and the Brits as well.
@frederickanderson18603 жыл бұрын
The Islamic mughals massacres of the Hindus is more horrendous.
@onemancinema42152 жыл бұрын
More than Maratha?
@Concerned_one2 жыл бұрын
Just because others did it doesn’t justify the harm British did to india.
@rahmanreshad49092 жыл бұрын
Muslims will take blood of britishers... We still don't take the revenge of 190 horrific years.
@moonhunter982 Жыл бұрын
@@onemancinema4215Marathas are real heroes❤
@Shahi-bangalah_13529 ай бұрын
Which massacre?
@nitinchalla7827 ай бұрын
Except for cultural and religious aspects, India never existed as a single political, military and Economic Unit just like Europe. It was Clive who can be called the founder of the concept of India as we know it.
@robhuhges11 ай бұрын
There were no women incarcerated in the infamous black hole of calcutta event.
@nitinchalla7827 ай бұрын
really🤔
@mauricebuckmaster9368Ай бұрын
There was at least one - Mrs Carey.
@ep43603 жыл бұрын
Clive of India was hungry for Indias natural resources.... 😆
@julianshepherd20383 жыл бұрын
It was fabulously wealthy before western civilization fixed it
@elkpaz5603 жыл бұрын
@@julianshepherd2038 And how was wealth distribution? No-one disputes the wealth of the Maharajahs.
@ep43603 жыл бұрын
@@julianshepherd2038 it was indeed and then a hole was found which somehow started leaking wealth into England!
@abhishekkhandelwal35822 жыл бұрын
@@elkpaz560 Whatever might have been wealth distribution, no one went hungry and died of hunger as happened during british empire. More than the number of people died in WW1 and WW2, people died of starvation.
@Daredevil311-g9l Жыл бұрын
@@abhishekkhandelwal3582bhai don't even bother the British will never accept the wrongs they did in India. They even named him Clive of India as if he belonged to the country when all he did was make sure most of the country belonged to him. When he was accused of corruption in India his defence was I was offered gifts and told I could take whatever I wanted and gentlemen I was modest and only took a couple hundred thousand pounds worth of stuff. He forgot to mention that both leaders at the time where on the British payroll. On KZbin there's a lecture called the history of British India. Everything is outlined there. Shashi Tharoor said it best. The sun will never set on the British empire because God can't even trust the British in the dark.
@uberdonkey9721 Жыл бұрын
Very informative.
@DevenErwin2 жыл бұрын
I live down the road fro where he is buried in a village called moreton say. I’ve always wondered what he was famous for.
@joeschmoe218 ай бұрын
Hah! We were forced to read about him in our school history books in Bengal! And yes, we had to recite Tennyson's poem about the 'charge of the light brigade' in Crimea... had no idea where Crimea was either.
@julia2k8 Жыл бұрын
Robert Clive is the real founder of India
@JOMfan Жыл бұрын
India already existed and was a thriving economy. Listen to Shastri Tharoor. Roberta Clive helped the evil monarchs and the bankrupt ‘aristocrats’ loot India and become wealthy so that they could support their decadent lifestyles.
@Prachi_Singh8 ай бұрын
Source: trust me bro
@Prachi_Singh8 ай бұрын
That's like saying I'm your father 💀
@ijumpjudyy8 ай бұрын
@@Prachi_SinghBUT SIR MY INDIA IS THE REAL SUPERPOWER 🤗🇮🇳 WE HAVE THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND HIGHSPEED RAIL 🤗🇮🇳 THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳 INDIA SUPER CLEAN
@NasimulHaque-ry1th24 күн бұрын
Siraj was not fit for the throne in the first place 👑
@tonyt79488 ай бұрын
Clive beat the Indians at their own slimey game
@nlbroomhall3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for putting this up, it's good to see unbiased history in this day and age
@krishanmohanpratapsinghgau802 жыл бұрын
Shussh
@ORDEROFTHEKNIGHTSTEMPLAR13 Жыл бұрын
@@krishanmohanpratapsinghgau80🤫
@ajaypal14121 Жыл бұрын
Defeated by Mahad ji Scindia in 1771 at allahabad after which maratha freed shah Alam from Britsh imprisonment
@sutirthabanik34182 жыл бұрын
Tell me this is a propaganda video…
@rohanxdavis Жыл бұрын
100% brother
@keithferns62123 жыл бұрын
Churchill was not considered at that time a sociopath or Dictator like Hitler..or Franco..or Pinochet..but yeah..Birds of a Feather.. FOR QUEEN AND COUNTRY..
@nickelmouse4513 жыл бұрын
`Birds of a feather' doesn't make any sense in this context. He didn't flock together with facist leaders, he actively fought them...
@sivaramakrishna2693 жыл бұрын
@@nickelmouse451 Churchill is a monster who has the blood of many Indians on his hands.The genocidal British empire was based on drug trafficking and the Industrialization of the west was possible only because of colonialism and imperialism.
@Concerned_one2 жыл бұрын
The queen is dead and the country is dying.
@joeschmoe218 ай бұрын
Every illegal immigrant entering UK is a Self-Made success story in the making! Britain should be proud of them if they are proud of Clive.
@lesliesutain197 ай бұрын
hahaha- so true... financed backed TERRORISM!!
@independentguy4357 Жыл бұрын
Trying to glorify bad rule of British Govt in India...this is ridiculous
@maorongnonnosheng86713 жыл бұрын
Ambitious😱
@babaiyermanispiritualandpo20622 жыл бұрын
Today's digital world anywhere and everywhere truth speaking or writing Karo and Maro and jhoot bolo jiyo.
@leifurthorleifs986910 ай бұрын
Wasn't Julian Assange a bit self-made journalist? Look what happened to him ... Journalists today, dhuuu ....
@babaiyermanispiritualandpo20622 жыл бұрын
Bahut Jaan Hain aap ki baat and looks mein.
@krishgetz4 ай бұрын
Lol... 25 mins of making excuses. One thing people have to understand is; no one has to justify the actions of folks who lived generations back!!! The standards of those times were different. No one is a hero or villain; it just depends on the perspective one views it from.
@kudaisiaduntola25234 ай бұрын
Sure, and I've been to both Mars and Jupiter.
@SapnaMansukhani-k8t10 ай бұрын
It made my stomach churn ...but isnt that what good presentation supposed to do😮 right or wrong is a different debate altogether
@krishanmohanpratapsinghgau802 жыл бұрын
This is very biased highly in accurate this guy is not accurate in his assessment
@LastHussar1812 Жыл бұрын
Care to back up that claim with some hard evidence?
@MrX-il2jt2 жыл бұрын
Well is his statue still in Britain ,, what a shame.
@quintusmurphy17413 жыл бұрын
A perfect person is full as dishwater. Clive mastered his weaknesses to more good than harm. We should be proud of Clive.
@sm40632 жыл бұрын
He was a king
@bl00dhoney3 жыл бұрын
what crazy misinformation is this.... ? lol
@Ultra_timelord3 жыл бұрын
British raj
@theoraclerules50562 жыл бұрын
@@Ultra_timelord The British Raj? This only came into existence & happened 100 years or so after Robert Clive’s age & times!
@Concerned_one2 жыл бұрын
@@theoraclerules5056 nope
@theoraclerules50562 жыл бұрын
@@Concerned_one Yep! The British 🇬🇧 Raj, 1858-1947 (Imperial Raj - Imperatrix/Imperator Indiae 1877-1947 - Empress/Emperor of India)
@Ultra_timelord3 жыл бұрын
Long live British Raj!
@anitathakur93402 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂🤡
@Concerned_one2 жыл бұрын
The British raj is long dead lol.
@gabbar51ngh2 жыл бұрын
Not only british raj is dead, current UK is US puppet since Suez canal crisis. While india is more of an independent nation.
@birutybeiruty4469 Жыл бұрын
Hahahaha
@rakeshkumar-kv7ii Жыл бұрын
What a joke... Yes Clive was a holy man who never fought a battle or killed anyone and he came to india as a flag bearer of humanity who preached everyone to love each other.. 😂😂😂😂
@BJM34972 жыл бұрын
The definition of purposeful ignorance; this piece of nonsense.