CNN Attorney Grills Navy Veteran Over Alleged Fake Afghan Rescue Program

[@lawandcrimetrials]

Watch More Trial Clips: bit.ly/ZacharyYoungCNNCase

[@Boundariesarekey]

CNN attorneys have done an outstanding job of establishing the price of tea in China 😂

[@pokerpegg1623]

Question is…. How many people did he get out of Afghanistan ?

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

@@pokerpegg1623 stipulated? 22. Proven? Zero.

[@ttfahd]

Grown man who served decided to work for corporations to go into a war zone to save humans........He got paid like you get paid if ya work? by your boss...... Maybe he should of stayed home and left them there ? problem solved

[@jjj-z3t4j]

He didn't go into the warzone, he was sitting at home in Austria

[@nicholasflorida1994]

What in the CNN Bot commenting is going on here??

[@TheEndisnear928]

I know right!! Every other law and crime video I watched on this case has been heavily on plaintiff side ..

[@8_bruh_8]

No kidding. All I’ve ever heard online is that CNN slandered this poor guy and now there’s all these comments calling him a grifter. Lol wtf?

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

@@8_bruh_8 we believe him to be a grifter independently of CNN.

[@8_bruh_8]

@@HomesteadAfghanistan Get back to work. Doesn’t Jake Tapper need some coffee or something?

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

@ it’s Friday in Kabul. Day off.

[@janetrogers4738]

Are you all watching the same trial as I am. Journalists acted unethical in my personal opinion. Gave him little time to respond. Jourmalists looking for the truth hold the report and give adequate time for a response. A few days to a week. Journalists also don't send emails such as he has a punchable face. Actual malace is a real possibility in my opinion with the emails on the record. The report, headlines, supers/titles should all have been reviewed by an attorney for CNN along with teses, bumps, items to promote the story called promos. Web stories unless exactly the same should also be reviewed and approved by the station attorney. I don't like his exaggerations. I don't like what i see as misleading actions. Explain what on the record is and off the record is to all sources or people your talking to who don't understand.

[@janetrogers4738]

Even video you use can get you sued. Have the attorney review that too.

[@TheEvilQueenHasSpoken]

Yep. They were so desperate to tell a story but had zero facts. So, instead, they created a fake story that implied the same thing.

[@chickensandwich77]

CNN lost the case. Big Time.

[@moda78z]

Very interesting trial. I haven’t formed an opinion yet, because I haven’t watched it all, but I will go back 👍👍

[@JASONBROWNSTONE]

Never in my life would I ever do anything like this at all. Talk about a dishonorable discharge. Unless this is after his commitment was fulfilled and he did it as a defense contractor or something along those lines and even though it's still dishonorable to act in such a mannor.

[@snippetsordinarylife]

He has long since left the army and CIA and had his own company (or was working for someone, can't remember). At this stage, the US government stopped evacuating anyone as they considered the country "closed", even though Biden created the problem. I would imagine anyone continuing the evacuation would be doing it at quite a risk to themselves. He helped evacuate employees from a few large corporates as well.

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

@@snippetsordinarylifehe never evacuated any Americans or foreigners. The us government was absolutely chartering flights in the fall, as were NGOs and volunteer groups, and the USG continues to do so until today.

[@geraldbaudoin336]

@@snippetsordinarylife This was originally Trump’s plan.

[@joseyzadoria7815]

He wasn't dishonorably discharged, he was working as a private entity to which corporate sponsors were paying him. He was providing a service to the corporations such as Dyna Corp in assisting people to evacuate a war zone. Remove the plank from your own eye before passing judgement on someone's situation that you yourself have no idea about!

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

@@joseyzadoria7815 interestingly, of the three of us, only one of us has local experience, local contacts, and have *personally* coordinated evacuations, in person in Afghanistan. And that person is neither you nor Young. Guess who it is.

[@jimhollywood2763]

No one should be surprised that getting help in a country like Afghanistan under these circumstances does not require paying large sums that ignorant folks in the West have no understanding of. When the CIA or other agencies deal with people in this part of the world they must bring bags of cash. You pay for a person who knows a person who knows a guy. Everyone gets a cut. I am speaking about people in Afghanistan. Getting a car to take someone out of a country is dangerous and you will be exploited none the less. In the end it is the US government who owns this situation.

[@debbieburke-gravetter1623]

It wasn’t an exaggeration, buddy. It was a lie.

[@theempath508]

This is more like a case for Congress in many ways.

[@jaeheatherJD]

Has this defense lawyer ever heard of HACKING?! Whether the plaintiff was in Austria or on the moon- is irrelevant. Devices are able to be hacked.

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

@@jaeheatherJD who would be interested in hacking him and why?

[@noracollins2040]

Slippery 🐍

[@geoffreymilke5176]

CNN sure is

[@XinyiLHBF]

The trial is over. CNN lost the case.

[@debbes9517]

FYI CNN lost this cast and paid at least 5million....and punitive damages(which CNN will never tell the amount)

[@debbieburke-gravetter1623]

Lies, more lies, lies to cover-up lies and on it goes.

[@dgod62]

hope the jury sees through this slippery individual

[@monicawestrn]

The defendants attorneys are buffoons

[@HomesteadAfghanistan]

A grifter hires grifters. 🤷🏼‍♀️

[@belleslettres354]

The defendant is CNN. Their lawyers are awesome. Young is the plaintiff and he is a buffoon, lol.

[@TheEvilQueenHasSpoken]

@@belleslettres354 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@robertwest2879]

@@belleslettres354 CNN are the liars

[@toneloke454]

Ok cnn bot, how does it feel now that you lost????

[@sweetpeas2898]

He seems delusional

[@droptableaccount1820]

You have no idea what you're talking about.

[@nicholasflorida1994]

@@sweetpeas2898 you’re a bot

[@jimhollywood2763]

While I would disagree your comment is irrelevant. It does nothing to prove that CNN did not operate with malice. So it is an obfuscation at best.

[@thetrainwreck1469]

I like how the judge smirked at the unprepared defense attorneys fumbling through his files. He knows how the case is going to end 😂

[@MildredWilliams-g4b]

Monday grab and I don't think Young is winning.

[@TheEvilQueenHasSpoken]

I suggest you don't think anymore...

[@MildredWilliams-g4b]

@TheEvilQueenHasSpoken I suggest you don't tell me what to do, appeals are on the way it's not over.

[@MrPickledede]

​@@MildredWilliams-g4b appeals are based on procedural errors not meritt which has already been established by the Jury

[@MildredWilliams-g4b]

@MrPickledede CNN has the ability to appeal the lawsuit, it is not known yet if they will and civil court is different from criminal court,know your facts.

[@MrPickledede]

@MildredWilliams-g4b they can appeal sure but the chances of success are another matter.

[@KunoØstergaard]

Bro suffering from mild form of down sindrom ,

[@brbrknndy]

I would never give this guy a dime. If I were on the jury I would not compromise even if it meant giving him a penny.

[@robertwest2879]

you're a fool and he won!

[@disgusted3191]

@@brbrknndy . That is precisely why someone like you is not selected for jury. If they even suspect you're going to be biased they send you home. You have to be objective.

[@Ironblood4564]

He won. CNN LOST! I wouldn't give you a penny for your opinion!

[@disgusted3191]

@@brbrknndy . Don't worry about being on the jury. Jury selection weeds out bias + idiocy both.

[@americansunbeam]

I do not believe the defendent. He is not believable, too whimpy.

[@toneloke454]

CNN bot found

[@TinaODell-f7f]

How is this not human trafficking!

[@chrishackett554]

Because it’s not. Maybe do some research what human trafficking really is.

[@disgusted3191]

Cnn fooled you too didn't they? Guess what? They lost the case. They didn't fool a lot of us, including the jury, the verdict is against CNN. They defamed him.

[@pugachevskobra5636]

Classic example of "guy gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar, gets mad at the people who told on him".

[@janetrogers4738]

No hand in the cookie jar.

[@disgusted3191]

Classic case of mindless remark. He was the plaintiff CNN defamed him they lost the case they had to pay settlement. Like loyal CNN viewers, you fell for their deception also.

[@jimhollywood2763]

Your comment seems like a BOT. But in case you are just obtuse it is clear that CNN attacked him personally with malice. This is all that matters.

[@disgusted3191]

@@pugachevskobra5636 . If the guy you're talking about is Alexander Marquardt, I agree with you 100%

[@Ironblood4564]

CNN Guilty by Jury.