CNN Special Correspondent Philippe Cousteau explains why deforestation occurs and its negative effect on the environment.
Пікірлер: 175
@queenbob55434 жыл бұрын
Anyone else using this video for homework in lockdown 2020 anyone??
@lezzei4 жыл бұрын
lmao me
@yt_Jamsey4 жыл бұрын
Queen Bob me
@zeppinator77254 жыл бұрын
me
@gallandrojnr48084 жыл бұрын
For my tech
@airianna76264 жыл бұрын
Yeah, for global studies lol
@SomewhatSummarized3 жыл бұрын
Homework gang?
@Bossfun_13 жыл бұрын
Yup
@tylerengebrits85373 жыл бұрын
yes
@txic26653 жыл бұрын
right here
@klas-63 жыл бұрын
Yep
@JD-gh4tr8 жыл бұрын
Cuts down trees Makes paper from it Writes "Save the trees"
@harvarduniversity92307 жыл бұрын
Really original...
@anged.reprobate56176 жыл бұрын
The paper "save the trees" is written on is usually written on recycled paper..
@skinnyism97796 жыл бұрын
the paper "save the trees" is written on is usally written on is usually written on recycled paper thats usually written on recycled paper so that the environ can have a very rrly good chances of the surviving the radiation that the earth has provided the people of the solar system that has conqured many different forms of land which caused many drastic advancements on the agriculture industry which majorly benefited the underworld that has caused tragedy of some kind that no one has ever known justifying the impact on society because it has affected many of the corriplastesoruous planstatanianiously vigerous chimpanzee. #kalejuice #instamodel
@talarabajian89334 жыл бұрын
Save the trees!
@mariaa54044 жыл бұрын
legend says you never searched for this
@linus29744 жыл бұрын
legend says my geography teacher made me watch this
@linus29744 жыл бұрын
@@robertcrawshaw9978 legend says it was actually my geo teacher
@tigercarings3 жыл бұрын
legend says your biology teacher made you watch this
@a_little_closet_moth.3 ай бұрын
@@tigercarings legend says your social studies teacher made you watch this because what in the heck do trees have to do with history
@georgepitsounis47588 жыл бұрын
Great video!!
@sirwamz10 жыл бұрын
Hey guys, Im part of a team working on a documentary in the Peruvian Amazon. We are telling the story of the Maijuna Indiginous people as they try to fight a road from being built across their ancestral lands. Help us protect the Rainforest! Search for Maijuna Film Project on Indiegogo to learn more and to donate
@raafipradhana79079 жыл бұрын
thats good and i like the presentation
@thinhla59067 жыл бұрын
Can I have a script for this video? Thank you
@DeeReject6 жыл бұрын
what about china and india? Ouch...I forget no forest there so, no deforestation
@YK-xl2ed Жыл бұрын
in japan , deforestations aiming to prevent global warning have happened everywhere, which i think is so contradictory.
@nguyentranannhi8564 жыл бұрын
Why CNN doesn't have closed caption for videos?
@scaratarthemsmsitarbug83044 жыл бұрын
I just witnessed about for a year a small Forrest being cut down in our little neighborhood to make more houses....it was terrible.
@DynomanYT273 жыл бұрын
HOMEWORK Homies? 2021??
@OdynPW3 жыл бұрын
school got me like:
@JJ-te2pi7 жыл бұрын
Always look for sustainability labels like FSC on your paper and wood furniture products ALWAYS.
@chickenpotatogod4 жыл бұрын
I came here because my teachr told us to, its obligatory, but I cant understand what he says in minute 0:50.
@sjmaharaj4 жыл бұрын
It means that they are cutting down forests to build houses.
@chickenpotatogod4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Chelenger7477 жыл бұрын
Hello, people! I am learning English. I am Russian. Please tell me where the difference between Clear-cutting and Cutting down. Thank you!
@koolntangy52823 жыл бұрын
Clear-cutting: Cutting down a lot of trees in a region Cutting down: Literally just cutting down one tree
@iconicnini29093 жыл бұрын
Anyone else using this vid for a google slide or assignment?
@ayanchakrabortygreendaless1387 Жыл бұрын
i don't think 0:06 is class-friendly
@a_little_closet_moth.3 ай бұрын
@@ayanchakrabortygreendaless1387 suing the school rn
@vnavarro1411 жыл бұрын
NO...we just need better management of these areas (such as community-based programs) so that people have other economic options and don't need to clear forests. Eco-tourism is a great example of this
@christopherstocks84752 жыл бұрын
precisely why communism is the way to go
@Aaron-zn1yz7 жыл бұрын
Is it ok if i Use this Video in one of my school projects? I have to explain deforestation and show how it connects to God, Jesus and modern day deforestation. I will Credit your you tube channel and the actor in the video.
@gallandrojnr48084 жыл бұрын
Copyright
@amnaaslam99010 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what background music they used?
@lol-zd8vs6 жыл бұрын
Amna Aslam it’s called The geibler squad
@nashbaltazar6689 жыл бұрын
wow naman edi wow
@nirimo54576 жыл бұрын
Ho yes it s amazing
@bloodfart66855 жыл бұрын
i left a like so this better get me an A on my report
@ayah32233 жыл бұрын
Did it
@angelpygs7210 жыл бұрын
shoutouts to teacher! XD
@slimyanimations92614 жыл бұрын
Who are you
@svenmauch38737 жыл бұрын
Hey, uploaded a video against deforestation, cause I care about and I think everyone can do something against it. Would be super glad if you give me some review!
@slavzy_98873 жыл бұрын
@Max Fu its practically inevitable to use paper.
@FCAJO3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting umm
@roseallen65613 жыл бұрын
I heard a rumour that this is ur homework
@CamilaJoy023 жыл бұрын
Close captioning next time please :)
@aarononeal98302 жыл бұрын
Cnn needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress
@iroh83433 жыл бұрын
Using this for school loll
@googlemeets96723 жыл бұрын
Same
@bornb32507 жыл бұрын
Myth: Deforestation in Canada is increasing. Fact: Canada’s deforestation rate is among the lowest in the world. The annual deforestation rate in Canada in 2010 was less than 0.02% of our forests and the rate has been declining for over 25 years. In 1990, 63,100 hectares were lost to deforestation and in 2014 this figure dropped to 34,200 hectares. Today, Canada’s 348 million hectares of forest lands represent about 9% of the world’s forest cover, but account for only 0.3% of global deforestation.
@CameronKerrBocher10 жыл бұрын
Simplistic little piece on deforestation. It names some rain forest locations, which one can only conclude he is referring to present large scale deforestation. The main culprit is corporate industrial logging/ farming. These areas are being raped at unprecedented levels. European forests were decimated during the middle ages for fuel and materials without any regard for replacing what was cut. Once those forests were pretty much gone, Europeans began exploring for new sources of raw materials, and when they were discovered those areas also came under the ax to enrich the elite, and provide fuel for the peasants.Then after Jamestown, Plymouth, and other sites were established, the plunder began anew. In those days it was said a squirrel could climb a tree in Florida, and travel to the northern most settlements without ever leaving the safety of the trees..Previous cultures in north, south, and central America were not blameless or even much smarter. as they too cut down forests for similar reasons resulting in their decline when the consequences of deforestation brought on climate change, soil erosion, flooding, etc markedly decreased their ability to successfully grow enough food. That created war to expand their territories to gain more resources, and on and on and on. Great civilizations were born and died in place like Chaco Canyon Anasazi cultures, the Mississippi tribes, Central American cultures of which we are now just beginning to learn of these factors. Even the jungles of the Amazon at one time had great cultures in pre-history. Here in the US, major clear cutting still exists,without any meaningful or adequate replanting programs. A large percentage of the northwest that used to be heavily forested now consist of a strip of trees along highways where just beyond the decimation has occurred out of sight. The numbers of trees logged over the last few hundred years, and not replanted is incalculable, and in all likelihood the main cause of climate change, increased CO2 and decreased O2 for us to breath. It is long past time for the practice of deforestation for the profit of a few greedy corporate players to stop, and a meaningful world wide effort begun to replant our planet, or our society will simply and eventually go the way of the dinosaur. WE ALL KNOW BETTER. Deforestation is not a simple rain forest problem, it is worldwide, and focusing on the rain forests is a way to draw our attention away from fixing what we have allowed to already occur. .
@CameronKerrBocher10 жыл бұрын
The major timber cutters in the US and Canada are cutting out of country for less money and regulation. I lived in the Pacifric Northwest for nearly 20 years, and watched most of it go from semi pristine to a patch along the highways. Now that the root structures are gone, the slides become more frequent and soil erosion muddies up creeks, and then rivers. Its an unfolding man made catastrophe.
@natalienelson96995 жыл бұрын
WE NEED TO SAVE THE TREE'S!!!!!!!!!
@angelpygs7210 жыл бұрын
deforestation sucks, I have it at my house, while not much, it's ugly and trashed. WHY HUMANITY?! WHYYY!?
@talarabajian89334 жыл бұрын
Angel Pygs, I agree with you
@talarabajian89334 жыл бұрын
Humanity is sometimes clearly horrible to Earth and all the animals. WHY!?!?
@ayanchakrabortygreendaless1387 Жыл бұрын
cos we want land for commercialization and to build houses. U may call us selfish but we are literally humans
@ishi59413 жыл бұрын
Anyone here due to Individuals and Societies or Design?
@chainreactorz20574 жыл бұрын
1:27 ................... Woah, dude chill!!!!
@gallandrojnr48084 жыл бұрын
Lol
@the_jzapata7 жыл бұрын
I'm skeptical when CNN explains anything. Nonetheless this was very informative, factual, and simple to understand.
@AzRill52 ай бұрын
ursäkta mig, har du en utskrift av detta?
@lezzei4 жыл бұрын
quarantine xd
@DeathAnglelover10 жыл бұрын
I think people should try harder not to cut down trees and also try to live with in forest and not kill so many things for no reason.
@mustafaa14588 жыл бұрын
there is a reason!
@andrewpollard80627 жыл бұрын
Knowledge From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Knowledge (disambiguation). Knowledge is a familiarity, awareness or understanding of someone or something, such as facts, information, descriptions, or skills, which is acquired through experience or education by perceiving, discovering, or learning. Knowledge can refer to a theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. It can be implicit (as with practical skill or expertise) or explicit (as with the theoretical understanding of a subject); it can be more or less formal or systematic.[1] In philosophy, the study of knowledge is called epistemology; the philosopher Plato famously defined knowledge as "justified true belief", though this definition is now agreed by most analytic philosophers to be problematic because of the Gettier problems. However, several definitions of knowledge and theories to explain it exist. Knowledge acquisition involves complex cognitive processes: perception, communication, and reasoning;[2] while knowledge is also said to be related to the capacity of acknowledgment in human beings.[3] Contents [hide] 1 Theories of knowledge 2 Communicating knowledge 3 Situated knowledge 4 Partial knowledge 5 Scientific knowledge 6 Religious meaning of knowledge 6.1 As a measure of religiosity (in sociology of religion) 7 See also 8 References 9 External links Theories of knowledge[edit] Robert Reid, Knowledge (1896). Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C. See also: Epistemology The eventual demarcation of philosophy from science was made possible by the notion that philosophy's core was "theory of knowledge," a theory distinct from the sciences because it was their foundation... Without this idea of a "theory of knowledge," it is hard to imagine what "philosophy" could have been in the age of modern science. - Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature The definition of knowledge is a matter of ongoing debate among philosophers in the field of epistemology. The classical definition, described but not ultimately endorsed by Plato,[4] specifies that a statement must meet three criteria in order to be considered knowledge: it must be justified, true, and believed. Some claim that these conditions are not sufficient, as Gettier case examples allegedly demonstrate. There are a number of alternatives proposed, including Robert Nozick's arguments for a requirement that knowledge 'tracks the truth' and Simon Blackburn's additional requirement that we do not want to say that those who meet any of these conditions 'through a defect, flaw, or failure' have knowledge. Richard Kirkham suggests that our definition of knowledge requires that the evidence for the belief necessitates its truth.[5] In contrast to this approach, Ludwig Wittgenstein observed, following Moore's paradox, that one can say "He believes it, but it isn't so," but not "He knows it, but it isn't so."[6] He goes on to argue that these do not correspond to distinct mental states, but rather to distinct ways of talking about conviction. What is different here is not the mental state of the speaker, but the activity in which they are engaged. For example, on this account, to know that the kettle is boiling is not to be in a particular state of mind, but to perform a particular task with the statement that the kettle is boiling. Wittgenstein sought to bypass the difficulty of definition by looking to the way "knowledge" is used in natural languages. He saw knowledge as a case of a family resemblance. Following this idea, "knowledge" has been reconstructed as a cluster concept that points out relevant features but that is not adequately captured by any definition.[7] Communicating knowledge[edit] Los portadores de la antorcha (The Torch-Bearers) - Sculpture by Anna Hyatt Huntington symbolizing the transmission of knowledge from one generation to the next (Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain) Symbolic representations can be used to indicate meaning and can be thought of as a dynamic process. Hence the transfer of the symbolic representation can be viewed as one ascription process whereby knowledge can be transferred. Other forms of communication include observation and imitation, verbal exchange, and audio and video recordings. Philosophers of language and semioticians construct and analyze theories of knowledge transfer or communication. While many would agree that one of the most universal and significant tools for the transfer of knowledge is writing and reading (of many kinds), argument over the usefulness of the written word exists nonetheless, with some scholars skeptical of its impact on societies. In his collection of essays Technopoly, Neil Postman demonstrates the argument against the use of writing through an excerpt from Plato's work Phaedrus (Postman, Neil (1992) Technopoly, Vintage, New York, pp 73). In this excerpt, the scholar Socrates recounts the story of Thamus, the Egyptian king and Theuth the inventor of the written word. In this story, Theuth presents his new invention "writing" to King Thamus, telling Thamus that his new invention "will improve both the wisdom and memory of the Egyptians" (Postman, Neil (1992) Technopoly, Vintage, New York, pp 74). King Thamus is skeptical of this new invention and rejects it as a tool of recollection rather than retained knowledge. He argues that the written word will infect the Egyptian people with fake knowledge as they will be able to attain facts and stories from an external source and will no longer be forced to mentally retain large quantities of knowledge themselves (Postman, Neil (1992) Technopoly, Vintage, New York,pp 74). \suggested by Sandra Harding, one which "offers a more adequate, richer, better account of a world, in order to live in it well and in critical, reflexive relation to our own as well as others' practices of domination and the unequal parts of privilege and oppression that makes up all positions."[10] This situation partially transforms science into a narrative, which Arturo Escobar explains as, "neither fictions nor supposed facts." This narrative of situation is historical textures woven of fact and fiction, and as Escobar explains further, "even the most neutral scientific domains are narratives in this sense," insisting that rather than a purpose dismissing science as a trivial matter of contingency, "it is to treat (this narrative) in the most serious way, without succumbing to its mystification as 'the truth' or to the ironic skepticism common to many critiques."[11] Haraway's argument stems from the limitations of the human perception, as well as the overemphasis of the sense of vision in science. According to Haraway, vision in science has been, "used to signify a leap out of the marked body and into a conquering gaze from nowhere." This is the "gaze that mythically inscribes all the marked bodies, that makes the unmarked category claim the power to see and not be seen, to represent while escaping representation."[10] This causes a limitation of views in the position of science itself as a potential player in the creation of knowledge, resulting in a position of "modest witness". This is what Haraway terms a "god trick", or the aforementioned representation while escaping representation.[12] In order to avoid this, "Haraway perpetuates a tradition of thought which emphasizes the importance of the subject in terms of both ethical and political accountability".[13] Some methods of generating knowledge, such as trial and error, or learning from experience, tend to create highly situational knowledge. One of the main attributes of the scientific method is that the theories it generates are much less situational than knowledge gained by other methods.[citation needed] Situational knowledge is often embedded in language, culture, or traditions. This integration of situational knowledge is an allusion to the community, and its attempts at collecting subjective perspectives into an embodiment "of views from somewhere." [10] Knowledge generated through experience is called knowledge "a posteriori", meaning afterwards. The pure existence of a term like "a posteriori" means this also has a counterpart. In this case, that is knowledge "a priori", meaning before. The knowledge prior to any experience means that there are certain "assumptions" that one takes for granted. For example, if you are being told about a chair, it is clear to you that the chair is in space, that it is 3D. This knowledge is not knowledge that one can "forget", even someone suffering from amnesia experiences the world in 3D.[citation needed] Even though Haraway's arguments are largely based on feminist studies,[10] this idea of different worlds, as well as the skeptic stance of situated knowledge is present in the main arguments of post-structuralism. Fundamentally, both argue the contingency of knowledge on the presence of history; power, and geography, as well as the rejection of universal rules or laws or elementary structures; and the idea of power as an inherited trait of objectification.[14] Partial knowledge[edit] One discipline of epistemology focuses on partial knowledge. In most cases, it is not possible to understand an information domain exhaustively; our knowledge is always incomplete or partial. Most real problems have to be solved by taking advantage of a partial understanding of the problem context and problem data, unlike the typical math problems one might solve at school, where all data is given and one is given a complete understanding of formulas necessary to solve them.[citation needed] This idea is also present in the concept of bounded rationality which assumes that in real life situations people often have a limited amount of information and make decisions accordingly.
@scaratarthemsmsitarbug83044 жыл бұрын
Andrew Pollard wtf dude you took like half of the comment section that people don’t care about I think around 96% of people did not care and just skipped that whole thing so HA.
@MadfellaDuke5 жыл бұрын
Hmmm why not just plant more trees
@Phantom_Kraken5 жыл бұрын
Madfella Duke because the land is in use by the business and it’s not that easy to expand a rainforest. The solution is to give the land to less businesses( only necessary ones) and replace land not in use
@Phantom_Kraken5 жыл бұрын
But you can do that in your local area like your garden,donate to tree planting charities, ask your local mp to plant trees to be in an area you’d like or if you want refuse to buy wood products from non renewable forests. As a side note if you have a garden at least one tree or multiple small ones(fruit trees included) would help a ton just think about it every house owner plants a tree that would definitely help.
@littlemaccasias86835 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@littlemaccasias86835 жыл бұрын
They really should
@kchlodny5 жыл бұрын
In 1989, environmentalist C.M. Peters and two colleagues stated there is economic as well as biological incentive to protecting the rainforest. One hectare in the Peruvian Amazon has been calculated to have a value of $6820 if intact forest is sustainably harvested for fruits, latex, and timber; $1000 if clear-cut for commercial timber (not sustainably harvested); or $148 if used as cattle pasture. Huge, wealthy corporations and even governments(China, USA)stay behind global deforestation, so it is fight we cannot win...Unfortunately, most people give a shit about environment, consumption only matters and each year is worse and worse. Only solution is to limitate reproduction of people with low IQ , pedophiles, terrorists. But it;s impossible - political correctness rules and today fools are favored.
@manit775 жыл бұрын
How do you like your wood house and your wood furniture and your hard wood floor?
@Phantom_Kraken5 жыл бұрын
M C furniture isn’t the issue as it can come from renewable sources it’s the businesses on the deforested land that use to much of the space.
@littlemaccasias86835 жыл бұрын
Bro you a brick house and carpet
@imAtreeWasTaken9 ай бұрын
Loraxx says no cutting down trees 😡❌🪚🌲🌳🌴
@Izzy-tt7id4 жыл бұрын
our teacher put this link in a video of her clicking through a powerpoint god I hate this school
@Izzy-tt7id4 жыл бұрын
I had to type the whole ass url out
@autocorrect2.0703 жыл бұрын
@@Izzy-tt7id you couldn’t just copy and past
@aristotlechange14243 жыл бұрын
Don't buy beef and save the forests.
@antoniomagdaleno56647 жыл бұрын
you forgat usa
@connormtb88333 жыл бұрын
yo who else is doing this on online classs
@bottleboy55763 жыл бұрын
me
@lol-zd8vs6 жыл бұрын
#Geiblersquad
@GOST_YT123 Жыл бұрын
noooo not capybara
@jamesharris93355 жыл бұрын
Tree huggers need to understand the loggers aint hurting shit
@autocorrect2.0703 жыл бұрын
yes they hurt the trees i mean can you imagine getting your legs cut
@narenkrishnareddyadala75637 жыл бұрын
it's a world's problem wake up guys it's time to save nature
@jacklees4219 жыл бұрын
U know, people r all like "deforestation sucks ermagerd it should be banned" and its probably true, but when you go higher up the scale, deforestation branches into things that are important and for the people that own companies need too do it or else they will go bankrupt and economy would die and there would be less housing than there already is an stuff.
@Hmonks7 жыл бұрын
a scale between a dying company or for the future of Humanity you pick.
@darkmatterhafnium15226 жыл бұрын
Because this is a USA news they say Russia do this to
@mrdeez78872 жыл бұрын
E
@YOURLOCALROUGHNECK4 жыл бұрын
Stop killing trees
@jimmyfaustjr73737 жыл бұрын
leave the trees alone. use steel and concrete.
@shi77e207 жыл бұрын
...
@littlemaccasias86835 жыл бұрын
Yes bro yes
@talarabajian89334 жыл бұрын
YES!!!!
@Bossfun_13 жыл бұрын
Who's here from rs lmao
@NATIONALCOMMUNISM66611 жыл бұрын
this was actuly A very good vedio this is A problem feuled by A number of thing capitalism over population so on but regardless it need to end.
@bimboccetta2 жыл бұрын
Xeropan
@lorenzodiaz30693 жыл бұрын
falopa
@calebjohnson79183 жыл бұрын
0:06 everybody
@KurumiSekane7 жыл бұрын
GO VEGAN.
@anonydeath14957 жыл бұрын
Even if you are vegan, you're still going to buy crops from the agricultural industry, one of the leading causes of deforestation.
@peteypete725 жыл бұрын
@@anonydeath1495 agricultural for direct consumption is a small fraction of what agricultural land is used for. Most of it is for cattle. So yea, GO VEGAN. And we can eliminate use of agricultural land all together with vertical farming like what signapore is doing. But not if people insist on eating meat. It won't be sustainable to be raising billions of animals for slaughter for consumption year after year!
@jacksonsimon98514 жыл бұрын
Guy probably just chopped one down in his front yard
@nguyenquangphuoc82614 жыл бұрын
save the tree noooooooooooooooooo
@autocorrect2.0703 жыл бұрын
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees
@jasperpattison66954 жыл бұрын
rudish
@DEzzynutsu2 ай бұрын
Terrible video yes I am a hater I have to do this for social studies not even science
@artsandcraftscrazynessarts91408 жыл бұрын
do u know what u cut down the trees and then waist the land so boooo