The MOST WANTED Unity Feature is FINALLY here!

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

🌍 BLACK FRIDAY Deals ENDING SOON! cmonkey.co/blackfriday24 ✅ FREE C# Course! [12 HOURS] kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4vTfotuh8qSaLM 🌍 FREE Game Dev Report Newsletter cmonkey.co/gamedevreportnewsletter 🔴 RELATED VIDEOS 🔴 How this Indie Game sold 3 MILLION COPIES! kzbin.info/www/bejne/noSlgpmZrrSIbMU The FASTEST TOOLS in the World! kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5mnk6qobLWsgJY THIS Game Dev Spent $600,000 on YOU! kzbin.info/www/bejne/sGSpqouOqLqsnc0 TOP 5 MISTAKES to avoid as a Game Dev! (feat. Steam Marketing Expert) kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZzWZqqLrpyNosU

[@Ced3kGama]

My most wanted feature is to chose the features integrated in the core engine and cut the load time by 95% and the build size by 99% for an empty project.

[@stevenpike7857]

Dang it! You got me.. I was trying to blow the hair, and then use my fingernail to carefully remove it w/o leaving a smudge mark on my monitor!!! Well played sir! /tip 🎩

[@ArcadiaCv]

I can't see why anyone wouldn't want 17 different depreciated or unsupported legacy pipelines in every new project.

[@FireF1y644]

Wait till you see Unreal Engine minimal empty build size (around 100 megabytes)

[@Ced3kGama]

@@FireF1y644 ikr

[@ArksideGames]

😅😅😂😂

[@claudiosalvatico58]

If I ran Unity, I would make the splash screen only appear in the best games through a contract that reduces revenue to encourage it. This way you prevent your logo from appearing in "bad games" and only appearing in the "best games", in the eyes of others the engine only produces "the best of the good games", thus preventing them from thinking that it is the fault of the engine when it is from the developer.

[@rapidstress2008]

The problem is... The reputation is already bad... So changing it like that would make it seem very desperate. When it first started it needed to acquire customers, so they added the splash. Their miss was that they kept it. It became a symbol of bad games.

[@hawns3212]

5:35 the reason you don't see much difference here is because the render pass is GPU bound, so by adding the occlusion to the GPU it makes the GPU take even longer. You can see this by CPU main timing and render thread timing. The CPU main has to wait for the render thread before it can finish the frame, and so it always is higher than the render thread timing. This is a good option if your game is CPU bound rather than GPU bound, however because you can take some load off the CPU

[@Magnos]

Could you explain how exactly we can tell this from the CPU and Render Thread timing? they both go down after enabling occlusion culling, so doesn't that imply that running OC is harder on both the gpu and cpu? Also in both cases the CPU has the longer timing? I'm pretty new to doing any optimization so i'd be thankful if you explained this to me! :)

[@hawns3212]

@@Magnos When enabling the gpu occlusion culling the gpu timing is 8ms, whereas before it was 4ms. The CPU timing was only about 1ms slower than the GPU timing (because of backend stuff it is always higher). Little table to help with the timings Before After CPU ~4-5ms ~8-9ms GPU ~3-4ms ~7-8ms After the GPU occlusion was turned on, the CPU timing went to about 9ms, because it has to wait for the GPU, which now takes twice as long, to finish before it can finalize the frame. The CPU will always wait for the GPU render thread to finish before it proceeds, which is why it is always longer.

[@Einxeld]

@@hawns3212 thanks for explanation. So when would you suggest enabling gpu culling?

[@hawns3212]

@@Einxeld If you are making a very CPU intensive game. I.E. Cpu timings 10ms, gpu timings 2-3ms, take some load off the CPU and offload it to the GPU. If your game is GPU bound, don't.

[@Einxeld]

@@hawns3212 thanks man, it's a shame the finals are not using this(

[@Pauglin]

I think the unity splash screen actually did hurt unity's reputation as a serious engine. The reason is that you only see the splash screen in crappy internet games and not that often in serious ones. On the other hand, when I wanted to start making games, I went straight to Unity tutorials because I didn't know I could do anything else.

[@Pedro_Marangon]

I think that's largely a problem of the past, back when the indiepocalypse happened and lots of "indie" low quality asset flip were released in masses on Steam and were made with the free Unity license (therefore the splash screen showed up). Nowadays this isn't really a factor, in part due to Steam's new algorithm that hides low quality games like those, and the fact that there's gigantic indie hits like Hollow Knight are well known as been made with Unity (the reputation they have now is more for the runtime fee fiasco from last year)

[@Pauglin]

The runtime fee was one of the dumbest things I've ever seen

[@fus3n]

it was an issue, and battle bit was one of those exceptions

[@elektra81516]

I never understood the Unity hate train. The higher-ups have made some awful decisions but that doesn't ever reflect on the quality of the engine its self. Love using Unity!

[@Chronomatrix]

It's still the most accessible game engine out there.

[@Jorendo]

I tried Unreal and Unity when I began my journey with game engines a few years ago. I didn't like the Unreal engine all that much, all the decompiling and what not just to test your level, it took ages. It wasn't very newbie friendly in my eyes either, bought several courses and sure I could work along with the videos, but as soon as I had to do things myself I just couldn't figure it out. I also didn't like the lighting in the engine and honestly when I look at the Unreal engine games, they feel samey to me in looks and I'm just not sold on it (as well as several other engines like the Frostbyte engine, I hate that one with passion, those games are just ruined by that engine). Also, try anything with vehicles and the physics are just not great for it, where in Unity I got a great asset for vehicles that make it feel proper to drive cars around in (Realistic Car Controller). Unity however was much more friendly to learn, with tons of tutorials, templates to use, different visual coding ways, massive shop to buy assets, etc. The lighting in my eyes was much better and after a few courses I was able to do some simple things without having to redo tutorials and courses again and again. When the big Unity F'up happened i did try Goddot, but that engine is not doing it for me either. Not enough to help me to learn it and honestly I'm just used to Unity and I don't plan on releasing any real game soon anyway so the whole controversy didn't even apply to me I figured. Now they have a new management and seem to try and do better so that is a win for everyone. I'll stick with unity, it's still the most easy to learn one out there thanks to how big it's community is.

[@w1-w2-w3]

@@Chronomatrix Most accessible? Not even close. There are tons of other options. The only reason of using Unity is because of its asset store. The asset store make using Unity a lot more convenience and can save a lot of time. The asset store is the only reason I'm using Unity. The engine itself is nothing special than other engines.

[@ragerungames]

Unity is the best 🎉

[@Metaldude-th1rte3n]

@@w1-w2-w3I’m learning unity cuz I also want to learn c# and since the documentation and guides are extensive I think it is a good choice

[@josephhirst4188]

Thanks - the video I've been waiting for!

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

Thanks for the super thanks!

[@gameworkerty]

6:53 this one isn't really "based on CPU" as much as it is precomputed. It doesn't work on procedural or very large environments, where the new one can provide a performance benefit in those types of environments

[@stevenmonster]

Creating a new project takes 10 minutes. Empty projects are 1.6gb. Changing a single variable in the only script causes 10+ seconds of recompiling before the editor will work again. I really want Unity to do well. I like the structure, but it is so incredibly large and slow.

[@Ced3kGama]

I'll tell you a story about Unity. I'm a game developer and in our city there is a Unity studio. I go there a few times per year. In the past it happened I talked with a few employees. I even applied for a job that I didn't get after 2 months of procedures, meeting over 10 people and passing the exam with twice the passing score. It turned out the last interview I had, the interviewer asked me what I thought about a specific feature. I said it wasn't designed good enough and explained how to make it better. There's a culture of ass kissing and even hypocrisy there and they didn't like my answer. The interviewer said I wasn't "interested" enough... I talked with the recruiter and the recruiter told me I should lie to create "better impression". Now about the environment and people, I talked with UI designers and UX experts they hired. Besides the fact I thought they looked young... those people never used Unity for anything, they have no technical skills and no computer sciences knowledge. It would be like HR doing tech support; can handle the people, but can offer very limited help. Those people are the ones deciding what us as users will have to deal with. As much as it sucks to admit, Unity's marketing revolves around making the Engine accessible to non tech people (incompetents is the taboo word). So they hire people like that. Unity LOVES when their non tech staff showcase the engine with premade projects like if everything can be done by the press of a button. Those non tech people are ecstatic when doing so because they are amazed to have any kind of results without having any skills. So, yeah...

[@xurfin]

may be your machine, it usually takes me 2-3 minutes to create a new project and it's pretty much instant when I change anything in a script.

[@diliupg]

Are you using a pentium processor with 32mb ram? 😢

[@internetexplorer7880]

​@@xurfin imagine waiting for more than a minute just to create an empty scene 😭🙏

[@disobedientdolphin]

I think the Splash Screen really did matter. As others already pointed out in the comments - the human mind remembers bad experiences more vividly than good ones. Since Unity was (and mostly still is) the more popular Game Engine for indie devs than Unreal, and games by indie devs are more likely to be horrible than games by big companies, the Unity Splash Screen got somehow associated with bad quality games. Therefore even the few professional game studios that make their games with Unity are most likely using the Pro version and are able to remove the splash screen and do so in fear of reducing the game's success. But that makes the problem worse since those good games weren't associated with Unity (because they had no splash screen). So I think it's a really good thing the splash screen became optional, especially because it's such a minor change for Unity.

[@joshb8215]

It was a stupid way to force people with extra funds to pay extra to remove the splash screen , in the end i can only guess buy the multi millions it likely cost unity in the end..

[@feidry]

Yeah, I gotta agree. I've seen far too many Steam Discussions talking about how, because this game or that game was made with Unity, they're Bad Games, completely misunderstanding how any part of the game development process works. The splash screen was bad and making it optional is the best move Unity Technologies has made in a long time.

[@DOSRetroGamer]

Let's put it that way, games from developers that are too cheap to buy pro (like me) won't usually be in the top 5% of quality games (like mine). So yeah, it's probably a good move for Unity to allow cheapskates not to associate their mediocre games with the engine.

[@JohnVanderbeck]

People will STILL know if your game is made with Unity or not.

[@william_coyne]

​@@JohnVanderbeck It's possible, but most people aren't looking at the binaries, just the splash screen.

[@ristopaasivirta9770]

With the occlusion culling you get more benefit when the materials and meshes are complex or they have high resolution textures. Because the Synty assets are so simple rendering them is no problem, making the occlusion take more time it would be to just render all the occluded meshes. So for high quality PBR materials and high polygon meshes it should result in net positive result.

[@Guywiththetypewriter]

The thing about the splash screen is unity shot themselves in the foot PR wise. I remember back in the day Unity was seen a slow clunky "ammeter hour" engine that was a red flag when i was just a gamer. I realised why later... because it was compulsory ... every cheap indie game had the splash screen. By making it free, you add the splash screen if you feel like Unity deserves the recognition. I think that, game wise, this will do a lot for Unity's rep in the long term, as soon all the "bad / poorly optimised" games will no longer have Unity directly associated with them. Splash screens should be a badge of honor Unity should now do a double down of making splash screen removal free, and now focus on aiding Developers so much, that those Devs then feel like the Engine deserves to have recognition, and hence actually be proud to wack Unity onto their splash screens.

[@Octamed]

Exactly. Ever pro Unity game never has it, and every asset flip shovelware has it. I think Unreal does the opposite because... well they actually make games.

[@sabbracadabra7083]

*Me, hearing about no splash screen within the first minute of the video*: I heard enough, I NEED it

[@abdiel_hd]

0:16 #1 is still readable lmaoo

[@zatelliti]

*open video, read the blurred one, close the video*

[@shijinmohammed448]

Jokes on you cause he blurred out a bait text, its different, watch the full video

[@zatelliti]

@@shijinmohammed448 No way AHAHAHAH that's genius

[@shijinmohammed448]

@@KZbinrUser000 🤫🤫

[@fv4202x]

I'm sure he knew it, but I think its better this way

[@KageBlink]

I want a true universal pipeline. Everything under HDRP working with URP. Like let me use shadergraph with particle graph.

[@RobLang]

In Unity 2022 URP I was using shader graph shaders with VFX graph quads, or is that something different?

[@KageBlink]

@ that and let’s say you want to make your project URP, you can’t just go from one thing to the other. I always have to deal with the project forcing me to redo all my materials. None of the built in things do it xD Would be much easier if both worked with both.

[@DreadKyller]

This exact thing has been confirmed for Unity 7, but that's still a ways off, but it is coming, just that because Unity has decided to do 2-year cycles from what I understand it'll likely be at least 1-1.5 years before we have beta access to Unity 7 Even so, not everything in HDRP will work on the equivalent of URP. The Universal part of URP comes from the fact that it targets an older set of hardware, because of this it's limited in what GPU features it can use. Modern high-end GPUs have lots of new features developers can use, but using them means your product is no longer compatible on lower-end hardware. Many of the features in HDRP are possible because of these new GPU features, and thus can't just simply be added to URP, because URP would then require higher-end hardware and break the point of URP, being to have broad compatibility with lots of hardware. They will be unifying the pipeline, but the unified pipeline won't entirely fix this, the unified pipeline will allow enabling and disabling features, and certain features when enabled will still prevent running on anything less than hardware that supports that more modern standard. If it's done right there should be fallbacks, where if a user lacks a GPU capable of these new functionality, that it falls back to a lower-quality approximation, so that users on older hardware can still play the game, but users with more modern hardware can take good use of their GPU for a better experience.

[@ArksideGames]

Unity 7 😉😉

[@MrSwan-tm5wj]

@@DreadKyller Can't you just swap materials ie urp mats for urp, and hdrp mats for hdrp. A simple script would do this.

[@MemeGene6969]

after fighting with both unreal and godot, im thankfull unity is correcting ship!!!

[@harko705]

SRP Batcher is hidden in Advanced Propierties (three dots at the side of Rendering)

[@tonyzaddo]

Thank you very much!!! You probably saved me hours trying to figure this out :)

[@antonandev]

The result of the work of these settings depends on the type of scene, in my project (RTS, city builder) the camera is at an angle of 45 degrees with FOV 10, my custom implementation of the terrain (chunk mesh), I launch the game with the terrain only and get 240 FPS, I enable GPU Resident Drawer and get 170 FPS, enable GPU Oclussion Culling and get 140 FPS. So it’s not all that straightforward. Also change Forward+ back to Forward, +10 250FPS.

[@Shadalac]

Thanks for posting! Can’t wait to check it out!

[@danielfowler390]

3:15 I do not have the SRP batcher checkbox or anything below GPU Occlusion Culling in my URP asset.

[@danielfowler390]

I did eventually find it by clicking the three dots in the inspector and clicking advanced options.

[@rikuleinonen]

@@danielfowler390 it's also enabled by default in new projects. Disabling it is almost pointless, thus the abstraction.

[@lordviator]

I thought my Compiling Scripts coffee breaks were about to be over.

[@paulblart7378]

Script compile times were never a problem honestly, at least for me. A few well-placed assembly definitions fix it all

[@sannanch7564]

if gpu resident drawer is such a good boost for performance then why don't they make it built in, why we have to toggle it and then we get the performance boost?

[@digital_hoboz]

Most tech demos work in the exact conditions that they are demoed in. Based on this demo, resident drawer probably doesn’t work on dynamic objects or different levels of LoDs

[@mandisaw]

Because like everything, whether it's useful or appropriate depends on your project.

[@swoobie]

Not all devices have a supported GPU to handle the draw calls. Everything can do it CPU side, so it's opt in for enabling it with GPU. From what I understand, it can be modified at runtime. If your game would benefit from it, do a check at start if there's a supported GPU and then either enable/disable the resident drawer feature as needed.

[@rikuleinonen]

@@digital_hoboz it works on both cases actually. It just sucks for low-poly meshes.

[@purpl3grape]

For GPU Resident Drawer requirements, keeping all shader variants will increase build size. If I'm considering this on a mobile device build, the additional shader files may very well exceed the build size limit on certain publishing platforms. - Which leads me to then wonder how would one go ahead and build these shaders externally and then load them in at runtime via a CDN? Or would I need to compile them at runtime if I can only load an uncompiled shader... so many questions, and more research for me on this one.

[@StarDynamics]

The most wanted Unity feature for the past 20 years has been a working multiplayer solution that has client-prediction and preferably lag compensation implemented. Unity never delivered that unless you are willing to hop onto the dots train and write 20 lines of code for defining a float.

[@rikuleinonen]

currently on the dots train, defining a float so far has been incredibly easy the issue is the documentation not the implementation

[@StarDynamics]

@rikuleinonen defining it for sure is a single line. Getting it into your actual game and turning it into an entity needs a 20 line baker a$$ class. Dude do u think we live under a rock and havent seen unity's ecs code ?

[@stevenpike7857]

If you are toggling a couple buttons and going from 60 to 200 fps... that should be done by default. I would have loved for you to talk about why you wouldn't do this... or provide an explanation on why this isn't default settings in the first place. What would be the reason NOT to do it?

[@MechabitGames]

It doesn't work in every scene and device, you really have to test each one to see if it's better or not.

[@Sylfa]

Knowing Unity's focus on stability and QA… It'll probably randomly crash the game if you use anything outside of their expectations. Or at the very least they feel they couldn't promise it to work so they make it a "you should have made sure it worked first" situation instead of taking responsibility for the feature breaking.

[@Fangh44]

It's crazy that when you are using Fantasy Kingdom which is the demo made for showcasing GPU resident Drawer and GPU occlusion culling, and you enable the features, you are totally doubting the fact that it's working and the fps and batches gains are not great

[@beefy___]

I made it show my (and my partner studio) logo instead of the Unity logo

[@j.j.maverick9252]

hey Hugo, thanks for your great content, looking forward to getting stuck into the ECS tuts over the coming break! Just wanted to point out that 70 into 210 goes 3x not 5x lol. It’s still more than I expected for a few button presses!

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

heh yeah it was 5x when I was researching and writing this video, it went up to 300-350, but because of adding the video recording on top it only went to 200

[@miracleteastudios]

Thanks for the video! :)

[@lstprj]

5:15 yep, indeed working! increase your batches and tris count... nice option but what the point?

[@tatoforever]

With GPU resident drawer and GPU occlusion culling, you will get massive boost with scenes that has shared materials. The synti demo might not be the best to try those features. Also if you have a powerful PC, you might not see substantial gains unless you are really CPU bound (for the drawer) or GPU bound for the upscaler.

[@-pcmr-108]

Thought you were going to cover the behavior tree. Would really like to see something covering that.

[@harko705]

My favourite feature is the option to show what's under the mouse and select it

[@Harjawalda]

Wow, switching into forward+ dropped the batches from 28k to 4k, and the shadow casters from 1500 to 350, while the tri count remained the same. This is Voodoo!

[@gamogis]

You should only use the static occluder for large objects, or at least only for objects that can actually occlude something, otherwise you will end up with a very slow and huge occlusion data file.

[@ivans8713]

Thank you for this tutorial man, you are helping us rookies so much!

[@benpielstick]

I'm really curious why your supposedly more optimal GPU based occlusion culling actually lowers your frame rate. I think it would be worth tracking down why exactly this is happening using the profiler or even reaching out to Unity to see what they have to say.

[@nullid1492]

The GPU occlusion culling will add overhead when objects are very cheap to draw (i.e. the simple opaque objects in the demo scene) since doing the intersection test will take more time than the actual rendering.

[@SamMcIntosh-my9fb]

cant wait to make my first unity game!

[@greenheart5334]

Already scared

[@GemTappX]

Have fun programming your inputs!

[@SamMcIntosh-my9fb]

@@greenheart5334 I understand why, everything will be complex, I'm still stuck on that 10hr course, It's been 2 weeks since I started...

[@greenheart5334]

@@SamMcIntosh-my9fb that is what I meant. No matter what you use, first game will be rough.

[@while_coyote]

For GPU resident drawer do you need to set your materials to be GPU instanced? Also I noticed you had both SRP batcher an dynamic batching, are they both supposed to be on at the same time? I swear I was told it should only be one or the other, no?

[@musicbyethan]

Just getting back into it after a long break. Unity Engine has always been my IDE of choice. Good video.

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

Nice! Best of luck in your game dev journey!

[@pivinis]

I used Unity 6 the editor is very laggy and slow. So, I just switched back to unity 2020.

[@ThiagoJaqueta]

That upscaler doesn't look half bad, I wonder how it compares in terms of image quality and performance vs. FSR 3.1, DLSS and XeSS.

[@MarvinDietrich]

Cool! How can I open this "Rendering" in the Inspector? I cant find it

[@cristiancaze]

This options are disabled by default? can't understand what are the counterparts to not make this enabled by default

[@corriedotdev]

Just launched my game using 2022. Going to do a test migration today to unity 6 and see if there are any issues. Hopefully VR support is good. Thanks a tonne for the humble links too :)

[@jbdh6510]

It has never been an issue indeed. It would be way more cooler to not have separate Render Pipelines. Or only 2 instead of 4

[@zaferyilmaz6057]

Do these features in Unity 6 have benefits for mobile? Especially in terms of using devices without overheating too much, like how lowering the resolution was very effective in this regard. Could you also make a video about performance settings in Unity 6 for mobile?

[@kd_w4110]

I most wanted feature is that the toolbar and the title bar can turn black.

[@swift_3D]

are the gpu resident drawer, gpu occlusion culling and spatial temporal post proccessing relevent to mobile games as well? or mostly PC?

[@N1ghtR1der666]

is the process for enabling the GPU batching different if not using URP?, also for the culling issue perhaps its a bug and is disabling the batching at the same time?

[@occularmalice]

This video is only 5 days old but the version I installed (clean URP project) Unity 6000.0.30f1) doesn't have the SRP Batcher option available. It stops at the GPU Resident Drawer. Not sure where they moved it to or what's going on.

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

What is your target platform? Is it mobile? Some platforms don't support all features. Set your target platform as PC and you should see the exact same options as me

[@occularmalice]

@@CodeMonkeyUnity Not sure what happened but yeah, it was set for PC. I'll take another look at a new project and see if I can get the SRP Batcher option back.

[@lief_leaf]

I was also having this issue. I created a Unity 6 project from Unity's Universal 3D SRP core and it created a PC_RP asset as well as a Mobile_RP asset. Neither had the SRP batching option. However, by clicking the three dots to the right of the Rendering tab you can select Advanced Properties, and you'll see the SRP Batcher is ticked on by default =)

[@SoutickPal]

Bro I have a question There are two types of licensees in unity assets store that are free and made by unity technology 1. Non standard EULA 2. Standard Unity Asset Store EULA Please tell me which type of license is only for educational purposes and for Noncommercial use only and which type of license can be used for commercial projects. Because I am new to this industry so it's a little bit confusing to me. If you find my comment then please reply to me.

[@andersmartensson8659]

I don't mind the Unity splash screen, but I would like the option to put it as the second splash screen that shows, after my own. I don't think that is possible currently, right?

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

There's no built in option for that but you can just start your game off on a scene and do some UI animation to show your own logo

[@Rook1e0ne]

Resident Drawer is not as simple as you make it out to be. As one does i was recently checking all my options recently in my project regarding the pipeline settings, after having recently upgraded to U6. when enabling this specific option i got some weird effect where many of my textures where changed for other textures, breaking my visuals (also no performance increase was there). Now i am not sure exactly what caused it and its possible that with some tweaking i could get it to work, but since i am not in an optimization phase i switched it off again for the time. (i am using Version 6000.0.24f1)

[@J0nasBern]

For the GPU Resident Drawer is there any downside to it? I ask this because I would have thought that a feature that gives such a big performance boost as this one would probably come enabled by default, instead of having to be manually enabled or even stay disabled in some cases

[@DOSRetroGamer]

Maybe I shouls try my luck switching over from the ancient version (2021 something) I am using. Just worried that half of the shaders will stop working.

[@BrentonWoods774]

I could read the blurred feature before it was unblurred

[@manuelrodriguezmatesanz7706]

My most wanted unity feature for years has always been serializing dictionaries to inspector without debug menu nor third party assets like Odin... :(

[@haachamachama7]

1:30 I disagree, as someone who works with Unity now, before i really knew much about Unity, i thought it was the "poor man's game engine". Honestly seeing a game with the Unity splash screen lowered my impression of it quite a bit, and looking back now i see that was unjustified, as Unity's actually a bit harder to learn than say Unreal, but it's also not the "poor man's engine" that i originally thought it was. It honestly felt as bad as seeing "Source engine" on a game lol

[@D.KRyley-mq1do]

But we're you just a gamer or working in the industry

[@haachamachama7]

@@D.KRyley-mq1do Just a gamer

[@SebSha0]

Actually the forced splash screen can be an issue if it goes against the artistic direction of a game. So it was an issue, but not in the way most people saw it.

[@suspecm6316]

Is the forward+ rendering needed for the resident drawer? Unfortunately it still has serious limitations when it comes to how many lights can affect a single object as far as I can tell so deferred rendering is kinda needed for me.

[@SkeleTonHammer]

Not sure what you mean, Forward+ has no limit on how many lights can affect objects. That's the entire reason Forward+ exists, it's Forward but without the 8 light limit. The only reason you'd get hit by a light limit in Forward+ is if you're using custom shaders that don't properly implement Forward+ (it requires a special lighting loop).

[@Jaimekk]

I'm finally finishing high school and I'm already employed, now I'll have free time to try to start my projects

[@AlexGorskov]

Good luck!

[@PetrVejchoda]

prefer optimizing graphics before using upscaler.

[@metall7331]

Any downsides to updating to Unity 6?

[@Ced3kGama]

Not as I know. Maybe the license management and actually doing the upgrade. It is still Unity regardless.

[@metall7331]

@@Ced3kGama what about the whole "charging devs after a number of installs", is that still a factor?

[@Ced3kGama]

@@metall7331 before Unity 6, they rolled it back after a serious backlash.

[@Ced3kGama]

@@metall7331 by the way, they increased the fees, but they also increased the revenue ceiling for the free version from 100k to 200k.

[@metall7331]

@@Ced3kGama oh aight, I'll consider updating then

[@PotatoManager420]

Man I wish a day will come, when some top AAA game will be developed on Unity and published The game, ultimatelly would be well received by public and get 9/10 and be super successful worldwide And a "Made with Unity" splash screen would remain to show everyone that devs are talented, as well as Unity itself is a capable engine. … But nowdays I see lots of Unreal devs try to advertise their game with "Made with Unreal Engine 5" mark, as some kind of mark of high quality, whilst the game on launch being buggy and poorly optimised. And only top spec PCs deliver good experience, whilst middle and low specs are unplayable and horrible looking. I'm not hating Unreal, I beleive it is also a GREAT engine if used correctly and in full potential.

[@ThisIsAUsername69]

Well if you want a Unity game raking in billions, you've got Genshin Impact. Although I don't think they have the splashscreen. :D

[@DexteryWoT]

Genshin, Subnautica, Valheim, Escape from Tarkov =)

[@IrtezaMasud]

the most wanted feature in unity urp is screen space reflection for forward renderer

[@hansfritz6026]

Is the unity gpu resident drawer also working for mobile platforms?

[@alexanderkulaev541]

Thank you for the video! So do you recommend to switch to Unity 6 already, or wait for a more stable version down the road? I'm on 2022 LTS now, and I heard recommendations to stay on it since it's greatly tested and stable. I don't get how the new rendering pipeline works, and I fear that my post-processing assets I bought for URP won't work in the new render pipeline. Could you clarify this a bit, if you please?

[@alsantour8835]

What tool did you use to show the fps in build ? 10:50 thanks !!

[@abdrnasr]

I belive if you check the development build toggle in the build settings, you can view this menu.

[@Adrian-ld4oz]

Looks like the gpu occlusion culling hasn't been implemented properly. They need to hide the pipeline stall by running it async and using the results from previous frames.

[@nullid1492]

They do state on the docs that they use "depth textures from the current frame and the previous frame". The overhead from the GPU occlusion is the fact that each object's occlusion state must be updated each frame by trying to 'draw' (without actually drawing) the bounding box and then the results sent back to the CPU.

[@Adrian-ld4oz]

​@@nullid1492 I assumed they were using hardware occlusion queries, it seems not.

[@MarushiaDark316]

I saw "Most wanted feature" and my first thought was, "Oh! They finally bought Odin Inspector?"

[@81gamer81]

@@KZbinrUser000 hethen

[@MarushiaDark316]

@@KZbinrUser000 If you need to do custom Inspector or custom Editor work, it's amazing. So intuitive.

[@juleswombat5309]

Well a SINGLE (configurable) Render Pipeline would be top of my list. So much hassle, and asset compatibility issues.

[@ugorjichristopher3370]

Does it work for mobile game builds?

[@MOONtyzoo]

Honestly, my most wanted Unity feature is still a true fullscreen playmode 😅

[@paulaitix77]

great stuff thanks so much!

[@fv4202x]

I wish STP supported stacked cameras. I dont want my screen space camera UI to clip through world if I dont use stacked cameras. I need it for curved UI.

[@Anonymous-2981]

i started you course for unity but it did not use unity 6, should i use it?? the course is free and here on your channel man, thanks.

[@sebas1111_]

Does the gpu resident drawer work with built in render pipeline?

[@-OmShinde]

I am not able to find the enable srp batcher option. I tried using another urp renderer

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

Are you using Unity 6?

[@-OmShinde]

@CodeMonkeyUnity yes, I shifted my project to Unity 6 but the srp option is not there. I am on Android build, maybe due to some settings changed in Player settings it must have been removed.

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

Oh yeah some of these features don't work on mobile so if your project is set up to target Android then I guess the options might not even show up

[@-OmShinde]

@@CodeMonkeyUnity Thanks for replying 🙏

[@ethanwimsett]

We make mobile apps that aren't games, mostly to leverage AR experiences. Seeing the splash screen on other AR apps sets an expectation of being low quality, and makes for a bad first impression.

[@pushthebutton4602]

To get rid of the Unity splash screen is good for those who make stuff for companies.

[@ivancarranza2473]

Excellent to the point guide on how to use those new features in Unity 6. Thank you! I'm still on the fence about Unity 6 fix on their terrain tools, I don't know why but the shortcut keys don't work for me (F1-F7) for (Raise, Height, Smooth, Texture, etc) Does anyone else have this issue on Windows?

[@pushingpandas6479]

I dont have that SRP Batcher option?

[@changemaker9751]

Are they working for HDRP too ?

[@MagicPigGames]

Wait, they're finally doing Nested Prefabs?!?! :D

[@GeorgeMice]

No matter what good game is being made with Unity,no matter if its 3D 2D or High quality Unreal Engine level game. People still dislikes the engine even after removing the Runtime fees. The sad reality 😞

[@helleye311]

Still waiting for modern c# compilers/runtimes. At least they're working on it, I know it's a lot of work to migrate a game engine into a completely different runtime, especially with years of optimisations behind it, but I want some of the fancy stuff. And non hacky Linux intellisense.

[@gakebagiannama4401]

I want unity can update the editor just like patch for its small update instead of downloading whole new editor and treats it as like totally different editor. its ok for update like 2023.2 to 2023.3. but 2023.2.21f to 2023.2.22f ??

[@hiTocopter]

Most wanted unity feature has to be orthographic cameras in deferred rendering, no?

[@DaRealGoosebumps]

thanks mate for this amazing video! is this working also for HDRP?

[@Nice.Creeper]

i realy hoped it was beaing able to serlize interfaces and or dicenary. No searisly. after following a turtoral that made a system that made it posseble i can,t understand why its not a defalt system inplemented sorry four my english i am tired and have Dysleksi

[@00ZeroCoolGaming]

I thought for sure this was going to be about Motion Matching... or maybe an easy way to disable parts of the engine not in use...

[@vycdev]

Glad to see that unity is giving the developers what they want.

[@TheUKDude_]

Sadly you are not 100% correct about the Splash Screen being shown being an issue. I have seen several streamers sigh when they see it and I have seen a few just refuse to play the games if it shows the Made with Unity Splash Screen. I myself don't care, if the game is good I will play it. But I do get why some people do sigh when they see the Made with Unity Splash Screen, its due to all those downloaded slap together asset games that plague Steam now and then just for a money grab.

[@kenktheGD]

While I doubt it made much difference, a lot of people pay attention to user ratings before buying a game... so if there is a signifcant number of idgits who go around hate bombing games the moment they see the logo, I could see it doing damage to a game that didn't advertise much. I think they have bigger problems if they are relying on store findability but throwing that out there.

[@michaelwilson8461]

I think the stigma around the splash screen comes from the low effort crap and asset flips that tend to be predominately attributed to Unity. It's a bit of a double edged sword, the availability of great information (like this channel) and ease of use of Unity ,makes it a great place to start for solo and hobbyist devs. Unfortunately it also attracts some less then ethical "devs".

[@williamhiciano394]

unfortunate this only works on URP projects, hope the put it out for build in pipeline

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

Yes this is a SRP feature, so URP and HDRP

[@ghod2114]

I don't gave the SRP Batcher option in Unity 6, but have everything else

[@CodeMonkeyUnity]

Is your project set to make a Mobile build? I believe if the platform target does not support it it won't show up

[@ghod2114]

@@CodeMonkeyUnity No, just checked it. Windows version. I have the GPU redident drawer option with its occlusion culling, but I have nothing more up to Quality setting. I have every thing from this video, except SRP Batcher and things below it. Didn't feel any results. Maybe because I have mostly terrain grass and trees which it doesnt affect, idk.

[@MarsLaaars]

​@@ghod2114 Put your inspector into Debug mode instead of Normal. (I found that SRP was enabled by default in my project at least 😛)

[@ghod2114]

@@MarsLaaars Thanks. It helped. I found the toggle and it was already on. Maybe it is the case for me, because originally project was built in the latest version of Unity before 6 and then transported to 6.

[@rob7422]

i thought unity finally implemented auto save in editor

[@MechabitGames]

Too bad most of these features reduce frame rate on quest, there is a workaround but you have to do some digging around to find it.