Why Are Programmers Switching from ChatGPT to Claude 3.5

[@AITester-j3u]

Claude is ridiculously expensive and the rate limiting will destroy your project. There, I said it for you.

[@MeTuMaTHiCa]

Agree with you

[@astronaut22]

What is the rate limit for claude ?

[@robind_001]

Yeah, I agree. I get locked out of Sonnet real quick and can't upload Excel files. That said, sometimes it reads and extracts PDF data better than ChatGPT.

[@AITester-j3u]

@robind_001 They sent me a email after I complain saying there GUI is not for extensive use. It is over hyped crap that has no commercial value whatsoever. Gemini also

[@DefineDeft]

It's so worth paying for projects is where it's really at.

[@jonnythebutcher]

Dude, Claud came up with the canvas feature before ChatGPT copied it :D

[@jevans1017]

who cares lol

[@alesholman801]

From my experience, Claude 3.5 has more recent data that I need from the ai model. For example when I am asking about svelte 5 new runes features and to review such code - Chat gpt completely fails to deliver quality code and whats worse, doesnt even admit it cant help me and instead provides me with bad code full of errors. On the other side code from claude works magically on the first try most of the time.

[@gregoriusmike]

Have you tried 01-preview with chatgpt? Just wondering what you think the difference is like if you have.

[@agentofenhanced2428]

Yeah but the limit on claude is just horrible you run out of limit very fast

[@rubyciide5542]

​@@gregoriusmikestill doesn't read through the latest docs

[@gregoriusmike]

@@rubyciide5542 gpt or claude?

[@IDK-di6bd]

@@agentofenhanced2428 for me i dont have an issue can be coding for a long time with it once i was dealing with a big project all i did was ask it to produce first half of the code then the secound and if its like really really long then i would ask it to cut it into 3-4 chats so i would not hit token limit or run down my times quickly

[@JackMowery-g6o]

enterprise-ai AI fixes this (Code complete projects in PHP or Python). Programmers switch to Claude 3.5.

[@engenheiroluizh]

I need an AI tool, regardless of whether it’s paid, that can handle large C++ codebases used in microcontrollers-most of which exceed 2,000 lines of code, amounting to approximately 25,000 tokens. I need a tool that allows me to request implementations, modifications, or the unification of two codes, and the tool should rewrite the complete code, applying the required changes or corrections in a way that compiles without issues. I’ve even tested local AI models like LM Studio, but despite having the hardware and being within the allowed context limits, all of them fail and get lost when handling large contexts. However, I know this is possible because... When the O1 Preview was first launched, it had no restrictions. I asked it to integrate two microcontroller codes, each over 2,000 lines, and it merged them into a single project with a total of 3,860 lines. It compiled and worked perfectly on the first try. However, they gradually started cutting its features, and now not even the full O1 model can implement functionality in a 400-line code without completely losing track.

[@hilawes]

did you find a solution for this? I have some 2000+ lines of code and both LLMs choke on it and give me summaries instead of solutions

[@engenheiroluizh]

@hilawes yes I managed to solve it, I bought a motherboard on AliExpress for the E7 processor model and the motherboard uses 4 E7 8890v4 processors with 2 teras of RAM and I am running locally llama 405b with a 200000 token context window running everything with CPU

[@hustlecodes2024]

​@@hilawes​ open the project in cursor and use claud model. it will do the job

[@enthasia]

Do you know why after 7 or 8 prompts the daily limit of 1mio tokens is reached? This really sucks in claude, it's not possible to really code something

[@kerkertrandov459]

Buy paid version then

[@ydkme-reborn]

​@@kerkertrandov459Even the paid version has terrible limits. I can make a chat go on for weeks on chatgpt whereas on Claude it's probably just 20 messages.

[@kerkertrandov459]

@@valeriek8077 maybe it only does that on the free version to incentivize u to pay which is fair enough as if u dont pay they dont owe u anything

[@Emanuel-Sampaio]

@@valeriek8077 I didin't get you. Can explain a little bit more?

[@vncstudio]

Use the Projects feature and paid version.

[@mihawk1096]

For me personally who used both paid chatgpt and claude. I prefer ChatGPT cause it gives me more worth of my bucks. In Claude I really hate their pdf restriction and csv restriction. Cause whats the point of adding the data analysis feature and visual pdf when you cant even upload it. Also their 40 prompt contraint really pains me alot. The onlt feature i loved was their project feaature whoch I really like cause it understands the file way better than ChatGPT. I would prefer to use its API for flexibility next time

[@MeTuMaTHiCa]

O1 bigger better than Claude

[@kobi2187]

Custom instructions for Claude is not as limited as chatgpt. that's also a big positive

[@nashh600]

@@MeTuMaTHiCa o1 is limited at 50 messages a week lol. And it's not even that much better, and takes 1mn+ to answer

[@douglasdyer366]

Claude can use up it's maximum tokens unless you really become efficient with it. Using something like cursor ai you can enable the five minute cache on it you help save on retrieval token use. Plus try to pack as many direct queries into it as possible per prompt. The Claude AI Reddit has actual good references on how to get the bang for your buck.

[@MeTuMaTHiCa]

@@douglasdyer366 u say : when dealing Claude u must act like prompt ai

[@ShadyRonin]

Just found your channel and I'm impressed by how much content you packed into this video. Please make more quick "how to get started" type videos like this. And also going deeper :)

[@akashsxo]

tbh I always used Claude only for programming, I just like their Ui

[@vncstudio]

Very clean interface. I stopped using ChatGPT because Claude has very low hallucination and high accuracy.

[@akashsxo]

@ exactly,i don’t understand why these $billion OpenAI suck at UI

[@PaleyBlog]

Clickbait title

[@Codemanlex]

No it’s not Lmao

[@---David---]

Both Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini have their pros and cons. At the moment they complement each other in my opinion. While Claude can be really good at writing code, it does at times write overly complicated code by adding unnecessary lines of code that you didn't ask for. ChatGPT then can offer a simpler solution with fewer unnecessary lines of code. That's one option. Another option is to specifically ask Claude to write the code in a simpler way without unnecessary lines of code that you didn't ask for.

[@vnzandroid]

for me, chatgpt always give a unnecessary line of code, and sometimes that line of code broke my program. i lost count on how many times i got frustated when chatgpt always give me a useless answer or a buggy code. now i just use chatgpt for a non code question

[@fortytwo244]

what did they do to chatgpt? it sucks now

[@skate1]

which version?

[@fortytwo244]

@skate1 every version, it writes garbage code and it's super slow and laggy

[@ibeetellingya5683]

Well, as a non-business user, I switched from ChatGPT to Claude because I find it's more stable, hallucinates less, less repetitive, less lecturing and incorporation of inane qualifications/equivocations of answers, remembers more, generates more coherent and natural output, and generally understands and converses with me much better.

[@RishabhMathur-fv5tq]

Practically i use chatgpt when i need to generate documentations or draft a reply , in short for writing good content ,claude however is purely technical tool, its not very creative, however claude leads in programming based tasks, it created better diagrams better svg's, i think anthopic is making claude more and more optimized for programmer , developer community...

[@VivaLaDirt]

I've been using both for over 8 months. i can say Claude is far superior in programing and software related tasks, only downside is rate and token limiting

[@jessedv5915]

Why not just get copilot and use claude in vscode?

[@iBasskung]

Thanks so much.

[@sunnyahmed5935]

so i am quitting to learn python or programming languages ? what a bad time to learn code

[@tomascaetano4270]

Don't give up. People with solid coding knowledge use these tools best.

[@Torkroodld]

​@@tomascaetano4270 actually I just study a literature career and im making a plugin for wordpress just with claude 😮

[@douglasdyer366]

Indeed. My printed code was shit until I brushed up on my coding skills. I work in finance with a trade hedge fund company and Claude AI has been such a boon after I brushed up on my Java and pinescript.

[@vncstudio]

No. Python helps you solve complex text/data processing problems in fewer lines of code and these tools are helpful assistants since Python is quite vast in the number of domains it can be used in and libraries available.

[@skate1]

Python, Kotlin, C++, C#, JavaScript, Swift and Rust are all going to be around and useful for a long time obviously Ai will take a lot of the load off but mastering any of them will give u an edge over everyone depending on what you plan on doing. me I am working on being a Unity Dev so my goal is C# and C++ but I still want some Ai Help with the coding. Lol

[@Jberv]

I use claude to replicate flappy bird using vite+reactjs and damn, Claude really did it well than chatgpt, even o1 cant beat sonnet 3.5

[@omorfarukmahfuj]

Can you please make a free course on AI for developers.

[@CodexCommunity]

It's in the works!

[@softwarenogood]

I personally think these kind of channels are being viewed by people like me, people with no formal education. There is a lot of hype around AI, but it seems there are fallacies at play. The idea is that these videos are meant to attract just about anyone to tune in and hopefully catch up but there is a lot of missing context. If you've ever been neglected as a student and you've had the experience of seeing how the teacher has a preference for the ones who already get it, you would understand. So the question is, can these videos really be effective at teaching or are they just a showcase for people who already know? Cause it seems all of you speedrun through the process like it was a videogame, you might have to encourage people to initiate rather than force through it

[@softwarenogood]

Thanks for the video❤​@@CodexCommunity

[@martin777xyz]

@omorfarukmahfuj please clean my house for free 🙄

[@obiforcemaster]

Claude's generations are very good, but the lazy generations are quite annoying, and the longer the context, the worse it gets. Additionly, when using the web chat service (Claude Pro), the limits are too low, causing a project to be cut off in mid-flow is enraging. Both are unacceptable for any serious work.

[@bingusarapathirana5159]

2:20 Hello, Could you please provide the steps on how you created with guide? Is it completely AI?

[@renevelasquez4478]

Hello, I am a university student of ING.Informática, I am from the country of Bolivia. Can you help me by knowing which AI is better to access the premium version, Claude or ChatGPT. in Development and code issues, both in quality, price or quantity. I need it to develop software and I do not have enough money to pay for 2 Pro versions.

[@iegfriedc0de891]

Yo he usado los dos para codigo, y creo que el que tienen mejores resultados y respuestas mas precisas la tiene Claude AI.

[@18hourgaming66]

can we have some youtube videos that do more than html, css and javascript ?

[@amanrouth6828]

In ChatGPT plus account under GPTs there is Claude gpt. Isn't it the same?

[@kobi2187]

sonnet 3.5 and sonnet "new" are really good at coding, they understand well. new can even design and understands your intent very well, but sometimes it may lose the context or try to redesign or reimplement sth you already did.

[@FunNFury]

True

[@Indiaraj-t7o]

📝 Summary by TubeOnAI 🎉 Introduction to Claude 3.5 - Claude 3.5 is developed by Anthropic and claims to be superior to ChatGPT. - New features include the ability to read PDFs (text and images) and control your computer. 🛠️ Project Workflow Demonstration - The creator demonstrates using Claude for: 1. Design Analysis: Uploading an image of a TikTok button to replicate its code. 2. Live Code Preview: Claude generates code and provides a live preview, including hover effects. 3. Integration into Website: The generated code is successfully integrated into a no-code platform (Wick Studio). 📊 Advanced Project Management - Claude 3.5 can manage entire code repositories effectively. - The user attempts to upload a Mid-Journey document, facing file size limitations but successfully compresses and summarizes the content. 🚀 Complex Project Replication - The creator tests Claude with a more complex project by uploading a Next.js app. - Claude replicates the homepage layout and design, saving 4 to 6 hours of manual coding time. 💻 Integration with VS Code - The user explores a VS Code extension for Claude. - After setup and API key generation, Claude is queried to run a Next.js project and add a hamburger menu. - The application runs successfully, showcasing Claude's ability to modify and create files seamlessly. 🏆 Overall Impressions - Claude is portrayed as a powerful tool that enhances programming efficiency. - The user expresses satisfaction with Claude's performance, stating, "it was like I was shadowing a professional coder." 📅 Notable Features of Claude 3.5 - PDF Reading: Can read images and text from PDFs. - Project Management: Capable of managing entire codebases. - Live Code Generation: Offers live previews and code modifications. 🔔 Conclusion of Features - Claude 3.5's advancements suggest a significant shift towards more intelligent AI coding assistants, potentially marking a trend among programmers to seek more robust tools than ChatGPT.

[@intercoldebtcollectionagency]

Tried both for MT4 Metatrader EA coding...they are both "useless"as you will end-up in infinite but fixing loops :(

[@Island_Algorithms]

I find Claude excellent at MQL5 coding. Maybe its the prompting?

[@intercoldebtcollectionagency]

@@Island_Algorithms no, with MT4 it's keeps entering in fixing bugs , fixing 5 errors and creating 8 news ones...forgetting pieces of the source code.I had much better and stable results with GPT 01-Preview but it is limited to something like 25 questions max, then blocks you for a week...

[@IDK-di6bd]

@@intercoldebtcollectionagency I use claude and love it. Im guessing why gpt 01 is better for much more complex code as its able to look over it again and correct it self like a human does while claude doesn't have the ability to do so

[@stevrgrs]

@intercoldebtcollectionagencyso take the core code and tell it to always make sure that is there when it iterates . There’s always a way to figure it out ;)

[@jaspercool629]

"Why Are Programmers are Switching from ChatGPT to Claude 3.5" the grammar of the title is not correct haha

[@softwarenogood]

There are two "are" pick one lol

[@PlayOfLifeOfficial]

When AI takes over, the first thing, people will forget to do is read and write. 😅

[@arturfil]

Guy used gpt to grammar check instead of claude

[@CodexCommunity]

this is how you know it was written by a human!

[@BxoxbxbxyxBxoxy]

this also is not programming... lol

[@KylePrinsloo]

Woah, this is cool!

[@MeTuMaTHiCa]

Claude finished itself on august(laziness)

[@Tom-ms5ot]

Like Jean Claude?

[@eLASTICs709]

Absolutely exorbitant prices if you really want to work with it normally as a developer. But even if you spend the money, there is still the constant interruption due to rate limits, which lasts for hours and destroys the entire workflow. Sorry but this is rubbish

[@ononaokisama]

The title reads as if it was written by ai. Programmers are switching are to ai lol

[@CodexCommunity]

Haha, yes, but Adrian's intelligence!

[@kowaihana]

Companies should just remove the middle man and replace them with AI

[@loc5706]

AI wouldn't make that mistake. To err is human :)

[@Zikuth]

it is way behind o1

[@torquebiker9959]

This video sounds like a sequence of ads.

[@javajoint]

jeez, slow down, take a breath every few sentences. It's like listening to a hyper small dog. Yes, I get it, you can edit tight.. but, checked out after 1 minute of it - it's a wall of talking.

[@Mr.Nobody_7]

No one is switching gpt to Claude now don't get fool, GPT was still top till now.

[@vncstudio]

I left the GPT subscription for Claude. Claude is much better. I also use Perplexity.

[@hanesmitter1469]

Frontend development shall be automated by AI

[@dacam29]

and now to DeepSeek...

[@i_youtube_]

I assure you that you cannot leave ChatGPT for coding. ChatGPT writes better code and explains better.

[@albizutoday2754]

This is so stupid is not worth a comment. Do we still doubt that we have reached a plateau?

[@Sindigo-ic6xq]

Then i am sure you are fine betting 1k that there is no plateau

[@Zikuth]

Yes, its silly. But o1 was there and was better for a month. In Christmas came O3. No plateau

[@QuantumXdeveloper]

For web designing, fancy and visually appealing work Claude is good but not for complex tasks. Where gpt perform better.

[@MichaelDomer]

For Pete's sake, can you all just stop talking about coding when we discuss AI..... flippin' nerds.

[@abhishekdas8807]

try cursor

[@Lemure_Noah]

Claude Sonnet 3.5 simply destroys ChatGPT 4o.

[@Zikuth]

O1 destroys Sonnet 3.5. O1 Pro is even better.

[@MichaelDomer]

Who the hell cares about programmers... get another job, AI will replace them soon.

[@eygs493]

f vscode

[@dgden8483]

So where is the comparison to ChatGPT - I assume it can't do what Claude did or you're just trolling us 🧌

[@justwanderin847]

I have tried 4 different AI for coding and even joined X to get Grok (paid).. the other 3 were free. Here is my opinion on Best to Worse on writing code, specifically Cobol. Claude Copilot Grok chatGPT Just my opinion. But None worked Out of the Box and required some fixes. But Claude did the best job. And of course it IS how you ask and give specs to what the results will be.

[@Indiaraj-t7o]

📝 Summary by TubeOnAI 🎉 Introduction to Claude 3.5 - Claude 3.5 is developed by Anthropic and claims to be superior to ChatGPT. - New features include the ability to read PDFs (text and images) and control your computer. 🛠️ Project Workflow Demonstration - The creator demonstrates using Claude for: 1. Design Analysis: Uploading an image of a TikTok button to replicate its code. 2. Live Code Preview: Claude generates code and provides a live preview, including hover effects. 3. Integration into Website: The generated code is successfully integrated into a no-code platform (Wick Studio). 📊 Advanced Project Management - Claude 3.5 can manage entire code repositories effectively. - The user attempts to upload a Mid-Journey document, facing file size limitations but successfully compresses and summarizes the content. 🚀 Complex Project Replication - The creator tests Claude with a more complex project by uploading a Next.js app. - Claude replicates the homepage layout and design, saving 4 to 6 hours of manual coding time. 💻 Integration with VS Code - The user explores a VS Code extension for Claude. - After setup and API key generation, Claude is queried to run a Next.js project and add a hamburger menu. - The application runs successfully, showcasing Claude's ability to modify and create files seamlessly. 🏆 Overall Impressions - Claude is portrayed as a powerful tool that enhances programming efficiency. - The user expresses satisfaction with Claude's performance, stating, "it was like I was shadowing a professional coder." 📅 Notable Features of Claude 3.5 - PDF Reading: Can read images and text from PDFs. - Project Management: Capable of managing entire codebases. - Live Code Generation: Offers live previews and code modifications. 🔔 Conclusion of Features - Claude 3.5's advancements suggest a significant shift towards more intelligent AI coding assistants, potentially marking a trend among programmers to seek more robust tools than ChatGPT.

[@Indiaraj-t7o]

📝 Summary by TubeOnAI 🎉 Introduction to Claude 3.5 - Claude 3.5 is developed by Anthropic and claims to be superior to ChatGPT. - New features include the ability to read PDFs (text and images) and control your computer. 🛠️ Project Workflow Demonstration - The creator demonstrates using Claude for: 1. Design Analysis: Uploading an image of a TikTok button to replicate its code. 2. Live Code Preview: Claude generates code and provides a live preview, including hover effects. 3. Integration into Website: The generated code is successfully integrated into a no-code platform (Wick Studio). 📊 Advanced Project Management - Claude 3.5 can manage entire code repositories effectively. - The user attempts to upload a Mid-Journey document, facing file size limitations but successfully compresses and summarizes the content. 🚀 Complex Project Replication - The creator tests Claude with a more complex project by uploading a Next.js app. - Claude replicates the homepage layout and design, saving 4 to 6 hours of manual coding time. 💻 Integration with VS Code - The user explores a VS Code extension for Claude. - After setup and API key generation, Claude is queried to run a Next.js project and add a hamburger menu. - The application runs successfully, showcasing Claude's ability to modify and create files seamlessly. 🏆 Overall Impressions - Claude is portrayed as a powerful tool that enhances programming efficiency. - The user expresses satisfaction with Claude's performance, stating, "it was like I was shadowing a professional coder." 📅 Notable Features of Claude 3.5 - PDF Reading: Can read images and text from PDFs. - Project Management: Capable of managing entire codebases. - Live Code Generation: Offers live previews and code modifications. 🔔 Conclusion of Features - Claude 3.5's advancements suggest a significant shift towards more intelligent AI coding assistants, potentially marking a trend among programmers to seek more robust tools than ChatGPT.