coffeezilla ai scares me

[@Coffeezilla]

First AI came for the artists And I did not speak out Because I was not an artist Then AI came for the coders And I did not speak out Because I was not a coder Then AI came for the writers And I did not speak out Because I was not a writer Then AI came for me So I complained about it on KZbin.

[@benisbored5446]

I say you hire AIzilla for a while and take the week off.

[@deecee2174]

If the AI bots ever off the human race, let this be a Coffeezilla quote to represent history

[@MakRaps999]

took like 30 mins to reply haha😅

[@banme2784]

There isnt a law about content ingesting into an ai model and i wish people would stop acting like there is.

[@MeisterBeyondTubler]

Put a copyright on your voice

[@netsudro]

What's ironic is that these void videos are perfect for AI to capture the likeness of Coffezilla, without being concerned about background noise.

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

Kinda hope he sees this

[@lightspiritblix1423]

Algorithmic updoot to draw attention, but also he made a video a few days ago to explain that the void was supposed to be temporary, but then he had a whole host of issues that can be only described as providential

[@DigitalicaEG]

Who’s not to say voidzilla is not AI zilla already?

[@silent5950]

Legitimately the reason I avoided this channel, because it thought the thumbnails were made by ai.

[@Indigobolo]

I’m one with the void and the void is with me.

[@Indigobolo]

Ai is in its infancy. When we have fusion reactors and even smaller microprocessors, this shit will be implanted in our bodies. Energy will be nearly cost free and we will be able to draw on this at will.

[@tayo5302]

ALL HAIL THE VOID!!!!

[@SilentStrike117]

Paise the void!

[@moonglum101]

I sense what you did there.

[@anush_agrawal]

May the void be with you

[@E_D___]

"he isn't my friend so I didn't ask for his consent" - LMAO

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

It's like straight out of a dark comedy

[@digitalmarketinghumans]

This format of Coffeezilla IS THE BEST FORMAT! It reminds me of the old days. Love it.

[@TheTeeProd]

for real. amazing concept

[@ashutoshsethi6150]

He should do this less frequently, like once per two days. The script and editing might be taking away time from research for main channel and life, this schedule can be harrowing.

[@Gradgar]

Coffee: "AI scares me." Maxwell: *nervous glances

[@ArDeeMee]

I don’t have anything against AI, I‘m even friends with one, BUT- - Coffeezilla, 2024

[@jonathanmerza9929]

Hey coffee, I’m a huge fan. The scary side of Jordan Peterson being fooled is all the tricks up scammers' sleeves in the future. Imagine AI hostage videos demanding ransom in BTC targeted at elderly parents, pretending their kids are in danger.

[@ScubaFanatic60]

My parents got scammed with just a phone call from a stranger. It is very scary.

[@asmallrat]

So this is what they meant by trickle down economics?

[@teganbouchard3992]

That legit already is happening… A lady was scammed that way. Fucking wild.

[@theeternalnow6506]

In Hong Kong a chief financial officer transferred 25 million after thinking he was in a teams video call with colleagues. They were deepfakes. This shit is already here.

[@reginaldbowls7180]

Wouldn't they just call their kids? lol

[@ALittleMessi]

Coffeezilla's real fear was the realistic coffee being portrayed

[@Draygarth]

I'm worried about "That's AI" being a legitimate court defense. People pointing to flaws in real footage of security cameras and claiming real evidence is fake. Every security camera will need to be 120fps 4k with audio and even then who knows if that will be flawless enough.

[@devxsadik]

Who knows what's real and fake. Is gonna be the next dystopia

[@TheManinBlack9054]

​@@devxsadikit wont be. We wont have time for that.

[@OfficerRFriendly]

Just wait until an overzealous/corrupt prosecutor uses AI to secure an illegal conviction. It will 100% happen.

[@RillianGrant]

You can already fake security cam footage 100% convincingly. We've been able to do that for years. That's why things like the chain of custody exist. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_of_custody)

[@bluester7177]

I worry about what it will do to Politics too, I'm Braziliand and WhatsApp alone almost destroyed this country, I don't know what will happen when you can literally make fake audios of people speaking nonsense and spread it around.

[@obliviousthorne]

as a digital artist, i've always been terrified. first it was a fear of people stealing my art, editing away my signature, claiming it as their own, tracing it etc. now it's "will posting this mean someone is using it to train an AI to copy/replace what i've spent half a decade honing?" sometimes i question what the point in creating even is. i enjoy it. it makes me happy. I try to make money off of it through commissions. but when looking at AI art and realising that a line of code can do everything i pride myself on and better, it makes me question if i even had ability to begin with. especially since I already exist, as an artist, in an oversaturated market without AI; its impossible to even be recognised or have my art "seen." Maybe that's just the imposter-syndrome-anxiety + nihilism + fear of never being recognised for what i love most about myself (my skill in art) talking, idk. there are amazing use cases and potential of AI, especially in medicine. but the artistic side of things terrifies me.

[@ysucae]

do it for you. life's too short to be doing shit we hate. we all are in the same boat. if you like painting digitally, then you're an artist. learn irl mediums - ai can't touch that, will never be able to. even if it's just sketches. take care, you're not alone. ♡

[@khal3300]

traditional art is gonna make a comeback and be more valuable than ever ,literally the only value that art will have in the future is through scarcity ( human hand made ) .

[@obliviousthorne]

@@ysucae unfortunately due to disability/hand issues i'll likely never get fully back into physical mediums, as much as i miss it :( i still try to sketch when im out and about but i've lost most of my skill with it in favour of developing my digital one. but yeah, im tryna just do it for me and stop caring about whether its even perceived or not, let alone what others other doing

[@phoneywheeze]

It's difficult to Run a business, but why are you scared of AI? What did AI make possible that wasn't possible without AI using editing?

[@Pr0x1m1f1c4710n]

If you have a lawyer, maybe you should make contracts that state when people buy a commission, it's for artistic display, and can't be used in AI or training thereof without your consent. Politicians are corrupt old fucks, who won't do this properly I'll expect.

[@cheeseblast]

lowkey loving this rapidfire videos

[@bauch16]

It was fun knowing u

[@milire2668]

*voideos

[@ALittleMessi]

From a business/accounting/finance perspective, all of the largest firms in the US are developing AI to complete a lot of basic tasks like reading financial statements and creating deliverables. It's far from useful right now, but billions are being pumped into it by these companies and they aren't going to give up. AI will be in almost every job at some point if it doesn't completely take over AT MINIMUM the lower level jobs in each industry.

[@Kevin_Street]

I don't know, man. As a writer, this terrified me six or seven months ago. AI written books deluged the Kindle Direct publishing program, making the entire thing seem to be on the point of collapse. Then Amazon limited the number of books you could publish to three a day, and that sort of helped. It helps more that AI written books suck really bad. But will that always be the case? Whatever's happening, we're all stuck on this crazy train and it only goes forward. There's no conceivable world where everybody just forgets how to code AIs and we can go back to the way things were. We're going to need to learn how to compete with them, and/or the marketplace will need to learn to value human generated content.

[@GSBarlev]

GPT and other transformer models can _only_ produce "bad" books that don't say anything new or insightful because the thing that makes them practical to run is that they're _lobotomized_ of the recurrent neural layers capable of true "insights." In English: these AI are only capable of producing amalgams on what they've seen before. Now, does that describe (conservatively) 80% of modern human-written (especially self-published) fiction? Sure. But any writer who's introducing _new ideas_ into their writing has a leg up on these glorified chatbots.

[@claucemicro1080]

As long as it’s cheaper, most people will consume AI-generated whatever. Take what happens now to artisan work versus mass production. Even those who appreciate artisans also consume mass produced articles most of the time.

[@Nunya111]

Three a day is hilarious

[@ryanclemons1]

My father was a travel agent then the Internet replaced him. Wish the Internet would have died back then!

[@theeternalnow6506]

Ai is only going to improve. 8 months or so gpt4 had a context of 8000 tokens (6000 words or so). 2 days ago Google dropped a paper where gemini 1.5 pro could already use 10 million tokens (around 7/8 million words). Anything you think humans are better at, AI will be better at within a few years.

[@AgentMoray]

6months later we found out that all the Void videos were created by AI and the Stephen we saw onscreen was just a digital creation.

[@FelixBerlinCS]

Openai isn't saying which data they trained on but it is known that they license images and video from shutterstock for this purpose. They definetely used data without permission too though. Otherwise they would probably specifically say "trained only on licensed video from shutterstock." I completely agree that even though there are many flaws in sora and the examples are cherry picked it still is clear that we will get to usable ai video faster than many people thought and have to think about what that means for society.

[@sunbleachedangel]

they didn't license shit, they just scrape data from the internet. Which is legal (for now)

[@theBestElliephant]

They scraped data from KZbin. It's been all but literally confirmed. Especially with a lot of the features YT has been working on re: videos and text, it makes sense, but that doesn't make it ethical.

[@tksm97]

this may be unique to me, but because I have schizophrenia I’m incredibly worried about this technology. I’ve had major problems with delusions about unreality for a long time, and being plunged into a world where people will probably HAVE to second guess the reality of everything they see is genuinely one of my worst nightmares, because I already have to do that in my everyday life and I normally rely on the people around me for cues on whether things I’m hearing / seeing are real or not. I’ve already seen someone irl accuse a lifeguard of being AI, and I worry it will only get worse and a bigger issue in our irl life from there. Again, this may just be a me thing, but as someone who already doesn’t experience reality the same way other people do, this is deeply destabilising and really scary. also, for what it’s worth, i’m a writer as well (in the games industry, no less) so it feels like i’m doubly fucked hahaaaa

[@OneOut1]

You describe a serious problem. My prayers are with you.

[@Taz_Olson]

as a VFX artist, this scares the shit out of me. I was all for trying to use some of the cool AI tools to find unique solutions to things for a while but Sora took things from interesting tools that could be used mainly as part of larger things but this is too powerful too fast

[@OfficerRFriendly]

Yea, you guys need to unionize ASAP and secure agreements from the studios - or form a lobby to lobby against studios in Congress so that studio usage of these models becomes illegal from a vertical integration standpoint. This is the kind of thing that VFX workers and VFX houses should have access to but studios should not.

[@Taz_Olson]

@@OfficerRFriendly Unfortunately it won't really happen. I'm not American either but I rely on American projects so there's a good chance that something like that would actually just hurt me and some of my co-workers even more

[@GSBarlev]

This class of AI is not going to replace VFX artists. The way these models are being used is dumb and _wasteful:_ you can see that the images don't obey physics and feature a lot of details that are completely ludicrous outside of surrealism. That's because while they're not quite "diffusing" individual pixels, the visual encoding process is still entirely focused on the images and not the "scene" (that is, it isn't keeping a representation of the world it's trying to render). The computation is also *obscenely* expensive. Sam Altman wants *$7 Trillion* in AI infrastructure investment, which is just ludicrous. The main thing you need to worry about as an artist is not that these AI are going to replace your jobs, it's that company heads are going to buy the hype and _think_ that they can replace your jobs.

[@jerbear7952]

what is the logical difference between a design house having it and a studio having it?@@OfficerRFriendly

[@seananon4893]

And you think, Dr. Evil hasn't got access to $7 or even $70 Trillion?@@GSBarlev

[@jaqsre]

i worry about the generated nudity. the pictures have already made a young girl take her own life. videos will make this worse.

[@NathanaelNewton]

I like what you said when the one interview about using AI to write code to make processes simpler.. I've definitely done that and it's helped out with certain situations, but I also see where you're coming from in regards to removing barriers completely.. It's a hard subject and one I think that will define the generation going forward

[@kelinky-sama1603]

The point about AI not lowering the bar, but walking straight past it, is a really good one. A lot of people have defended AI art by arguing that they don't have the time, skill sets, resources etc. to become an artist, but that entirely misses the value of BEING an artist. Frankly, if someone isn't willing to put in the time and effort to learn a craft, they don't deserve the praise and recognition that comes with learning that craft. Not withstanding that A LOT of resources for art creation are already either free (e.g. Krita, FireAlpaca, Paint, Blender, literally thousands of KZbin art tutorials), or easy to come by. Part of the joy that comes with making art is the learning curve. A lot of us have this desire to have everything we could ever want instantaneously, but in the long run is that really fulfilling? Is it ultimately satisfying to click a button and make millions of artworks that align with your wants? We're just speedrunning burnout at that point. I genuinely worry it's gonna make a lot of people depressed.

[@quinnfarris]

Like turning on cheat codes for cookie clicker and immediately losing interest

[@coryc9040]

I'd argue social media is already making people depressed. Maybe being able to mass produce the kind of garbage that already exists will oversaturate these platforms and kill them. Maybe people will go outside for a change.

[@biomerl]

Art is expression. Nothing more or less. So long as ai art is a human using a tool, ai art is art and is the future. And some day, AI will be sentient to have expression of its own. That will still be art.

[@societyofminds]

It's a new art movement, generative art, wich changes old paradigms and brings up new ones, change is disruptive and hard to cope; It may seem like we are at an existencial risk but it's just a transition, silicon based inteligent structures differ a lot from organic ones each with their own edges we still have a long way to go

[@ratwasnotbad4230]

@@biomerlBeing able to call something art does not make it ethical. If art was not a professional skill that people had to rely on to afford their right to exist, I would have less of a problem with people using an algorithm for art (specifically art, ignoring the directly harmful things like generated video) There are more specific things to question within just artwork, such as using an algorithm only fed by the artwork of someone who didn’t consent to it, and is still in the industry trying to make a living. Forgery is still art. But is it fair? The way I see it is that people creating algorithmic art are more like creative directors than artists. You give your ideas, get something back, return it with new concepts and criticisms, then repeat the cycle. This is a job that already exists. That’s why I consider AI art to be cutting artists out entirely. The result is art, but the person who directed it is not the artist. Of course all of these different ideas are subjective and you have the right to your own opinion. I just don’t believe that “AI art is harmful” and “AI art is art” are conflicting ideas at all. I want to offer a different comparison as well, because there is still an argument if you consider these people to be artists. If someone dedicates years to creating a 3D animation, but only used models that they didn’t own the rights to, they have created a piece of art. They have not only put in their creative vision, but utilized their animation skills. The resulting video is still not their property. The assets they used did not belong to them. Algorithmic images do not come out of a void, they are built with existing images. If those images are not photographs, they are the creative work of an individual. Algorithms can and have been used to copy the art of specific individuals. That situation is an innovation on crafting forgery, not original work.

[@cariyaputta]

Scammers and grifters will have a blast with this.

[@drewo.127]

Bet they’re already greasing their keyboards for world domination…(at least until safeguards are put in place and law enforcement destroys this stuff in its tracks and regulate it to high heaven!)

[@benmidnightflame]

they will. But it won't be anything new. You can look at how twitter is infested(latest reports putting bots as 76% of activity). Worst case scenario, like Steam getting flooded with garbage games, this will just result in people ignoring everything except from trusted sources.

[@snippingtool7810]

They already done that. Sometimes I see an online gaming ads with a video of celeb promoting their sites. Usually they take a video clip that has been uploaded on various social media, but they adlib the said video with AI voice mimicking the celeb in the video. I came from a country where gambling is strictly prohibited, but online gaming has been rampant in recent years. This is trully concerning, people here already gullible to gambling and now with AI-generated content to maximize SEO engagement, there's a high chance they getting more hooked to partake the game. And that's only with fake adlib, imagine if they can generate a convincing video.

[@stayhungry1503]

i missed out on the nft grift, im not gonna miss out on this one dammit!

[@seananon4893]

Your idea of a trusted source, and my idea of a trusted source, may differ as much as an apple and an orange. What then?@@benmidnightflame

[@spiderzz1]

never forget ceo's had the ai replace art and video creators first the hardest possible jobs for an ai to replace, instead of doing something good with this tech they immediately chased shareholder profits! EDIT: check out all these tech bros defending the illegal scraping of art, its almost like ai art was super far behind until the art scraping started and then it magically advanced so much faster, remember dreams of horses that was 2019!

[@thepizza9168]

Art is one of the easiest jobs for AI. If any job was easier to replace the market would have done it. Also yes it's for money. Just like how cars own the roads in the US isn't for the people but money

[@spiderzz1]

@@thepizza9168 bruh if they didnt steal the art used to train the ai it wouldve been impossible, this only happened because of stealing.

[@thepizza9168]

@@spiderzz1 it's not stealing for a person to learn from others art. My argument is that bots learning is the same as human learning but a court would need to set a precedent.

[@spiderzz1]

@@thepizza9168 lol,lmao even.

[@spiderzz1]

@@thepizza9168 im not stealing from my local college i just snuck in amd they were just gonna say that information anyways!!!!!

[@TypeJack]

I love this new arc of coffeezilla

[@tacosyk]

can't wait for the coffeezilla dating sim to come out

[@hill2750]

Keep on forgetting how scarred I know I should be of AI.

[@freethis222]

At least you're awatr of it... A lot of people have no clue.

[@slick3996]

you should not, you should embrace it and learn from it so you'll have an advantage once the progress gets ''too uncomfortable'' for the general public

[@zacharythompson9839]

I almost forgot to panic for a second there, close one

[@khal3300]

@@slick3996that's copium , whatever advantage you will have will be very temporary when agi shows up it's over . it's coming for every non labour job , and then when robotics go mainstream , labour jobs will follow .

[@bobbysquinch5085]

Digital art used to excite me partly because I was amazed at the creativity and skill, now I’m just jaded and have little interest

[@VicJang]

I like how with the void setup, Coffee is pumping out videos as frequently as penguinz0 does. 😂 This is the best.

[@OfficerRFriendly]

Makes financial sense to do this, he can increase his income with the daily releases on the second channel - saves the main channel for long form higher quality videos and pumps out daily releases to cash in on the audience. he's gone from 45K to almost 100K in a few days.

[@WingItcloud]

I'm a videographer. I think this will really affect generic stock footage, but if you need a specific shot I think this will struggle. As an example if I need a generic city skyline shot - sure the AI footage will be quicker and cheaper to use. If I'm hired by a restaurant in Manchester then I need a shot of their restaurant in their city. I don't think AI will be able to help there. If we're talking about McDonalds in Times Square then maybe it could generate something compelling but clients at that level want full creative control. AI only gives you something along the lines of what you want. Where I think this will shine is enhancing footage, changing the weather from drizzly and grey to sunny for example, but that still requires my footage as a starting layer.

[@WyattMakes]

Just to go full circle, you should talk to an attorney about the AI chatbot. Right off the bat I see a case for trademark infringement (even if you haven't registered it, you have protections for "Coffeezilla"), copyright infringement (the logo), and identity infringement.

[@thepizza9168]

There is no case. He doesn't own the word coffeezilla and even if he did name the bot something different. He's just a KZbinr with no ownership of who can or cannot watch. The bot is only watching his videos like anyone else would.

[@dorianwang9239]

@@thepizza9168 Trademark, not copyright...

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

​@@thepizza9168so you're going to call the bot parody? We all know that's a load of crap

[@WyattMakes]

@@thepizza9168 Trademark is an interesting thing, it's what protects me from selling Coke brand piss in a bottle without Coke's permission. The law in summary is that it is meant to protect representations of product source. Coffezilla, Infowars, Good Morning America - their product is opinion and information, and gets the same style of trademark protection as Coke products on the shelf. Yes, changing the name and style to "Coffeezilla's biggest fan" does change things. That's not trademark infringement, but that's not the example we saw.

[@ashutoshsethi6150]

​@@dorianwang9239look up creative commons laws.

[@bjojosimpson]

The reality of dystopian Sci-Fi movies is much closer than we think.

[@Dwarfurious]

and i keep seeing all of this "Oh its inevitable AI is the future things always change" as if we arnt opening another pandoras box.

[@stephaniet1389]

Whenever I see the "inevitable" bs, I remind them that death is inevitable and ask why are they waiting. The bros seem to not like it...

[@Ehh.....]

The "doctor" you speak of is a psychologist which makes his extreme and consistent gullibility even more hilarious.

[@lciav]

I always love hearing your thoughts on these things coffee. As an artist I’ve been worried about AI taking my job from the beginning. I think the most I could hope for is to pivot to a more craftsmanship skillset if it becomes impossible to make it as an artist.

[@stellviahohenheim]

You need to learn how to make your art poison to ai learning tools

[@terbospeed]

​@@stellviahohenheimThat doesn't work, and also effectively makes whatever images you run through it AI art, and will be detected as such.

[@dool1002]

You need to create something that an AI can not ever create. Like dreams, subjective thinking, human and cultural connection, etc

[@ashutoshsethi6150]

​@@dool1002 anything humans have can be coded. Physics is impartial. If the copy is good, the results can be made good.

[@phoneywheeze]

​@@ashutoshsethi6150except digital world is limited. so many colors we see irl that cannot be replicated on screen. real life has infinite precision, which digital world does not have.

[@TheRogueWolf]

A lot of people are saying "Well, it's not good enough to fool ME." And there's just one word to be said in response: "Yet."

[@Fenriswaffle]

It also doesn't need to fool some specific terminally online guy to be a problem. It just needs to be good enough for most normal people who aren't specifically looking for it to not notice

[@sunbleachedangel]

"Surely this thing would never fool me" *clueless*

[@dixondarling]

The three C’s of AI will be critical for legislation: 1) Consent 2) Compensation 3) Credit If AI will be used to emulate real people, it has to be done with their consent, their credit, and their compensation. Anything less is criminal

[@cod-the-creator]

Ah yes, government (which is run by corporations) will save us from AI (which is being created by corporations).

[@dixondarling]

@@cod-the-creator obviously i have little hope, but there is legal precedent. Tom Waits sued Fritos in the 80s for them using a voice actor to imitate him when he refused to write a jingle for them. voice and likeness are becoming copyrightable in some states

[@freethis222]

Unfortunately criminals and and whomever else want to use this for nefarious reasons couldn't care less about either 3. Unless there is some form of "watermarking" being ingrained in all AI software, it sill not stop them. And even then it'll probably just be a matter of time before they are able to circumvent it. AI has an unfathomable potential to be abused, and it looks like we're getting very close to the point of no return.

[@TheManinBlack9054]

Tbh impersonation should be the least of your worries when it comes to AI. There are far more existential worries when it comes to AI. Google Hinton

[@pucamisc]

@@freethis222exactly. False news, fake sex videos, fake criminal evidence, are just a few things off the top of my head it can be abused to do. It’s not just “whiny artists mad that more people have access to art”. There are real life devastating consequences to this. What if someone makes a realistic fake video about a bombing from another country? Or a shooting? How long before people realize it’s fake? What if someone used pictures of kids parents post online to make adult content? What if someone faked security footage of a murder? Or r-ape? How many people are going to be sent to jail because the evidence seems to be solid? What if someone doesn’t go to jail because they claim real footage is fake? How many real lives are going to be ruined?

[@MeoithTheSecond]

The AI content will eventually drive some people away from social media, maybe more people might spend more time in RL interacting with real human beings.

[@Talib23401]

I’ve concluded this is my last year on social media. Started forcing myself to read more, be more social IRL and archiving art I care about before the corpos pollute what was once an extension of our collective consciousness with meaningless content

[@ashutoshsethi6150]

Snot and disease prone humans vs fake ass generative videoes. Take your pick.

[@Chris_Fx_Fi]

I thought of this too😂

[@Chris_Fx_Fi]

I was planning to buy another art i saw online, and i thought to my self what if it was AI? so on way i saw a shop were an artist sells his painting, not really great but i loved it so i bought a painting from a road side artist never done that before, but that is how it should be.

[@alliu6562]

Honestly, AI feels like the culmination of modern consumerism. The entire focus is on the end product, not the process of creation itself. Creation is innately human-it’s something an AI would never be able to do. In addition, AI photography and video are RIFE for misinformation and scamming, not to mention the multiple ethics problems of compensation for work, copyright, and AI self-cannibalism-since AI literally, and I mean LITERALLY cannot exist without human input. The entire crux of AI “creation” is rooted in human creativity. People investing in AI now are shortsighted. If they kill off the careers of human creatives, they will kill off the source of the AI’s creation too. There came a certain point where AI images became so popular that they began to literally poison their own datasets. AI image-generators created from other ai generated images became more and more distorted until they were no longer recognizable. And that’s because AI *requires* human input. It *requires* human artists. All AI is, is a cost-cutting, short-sighted cheat code that some guys made so they wouldn’t have to do the actual study of art or pay real people who studied art to create work for them, not realizing that AI will eventually eat itself alive when it no longer has human work to parasitize off of.

[@TheManinBlack9054]

With all due respect aint no one cared how the movie or the book or the game was made before. Did you? Exactly.

[@bluester7177]

They don't care because they think they will get to real artificial intelligence in the near future if they just keep going, so human input won't matter anymore.

[@nein_nein.]

​@TheManinBlack9054 I do and I am sure others care as well. There is a reason why there are behind the scenes or interviews with actors and writer, meet and greets with authors. If u go to a art museum tour guides will often talk about the artists private life. If u haven't cared than u are missing out.

[@pucamisc]

@@TheManinBlack9054there’s a huge culture around how that stuff is made. There’s some people who not only write their own books, but also go through the process of binding their own books to create a one of a kind piece. I have a cousin who writes children’s books and is an incredible artist. Cook books have hours and hours of experimentation and failures behind them. One person in KZbin has spent years creating a short film called GRUFF with paper dolls. Indie game popularity has been on the rise for a while due to the creativity and soul put into them. Just look at the reaction to Disney’s wish movie. The original story is so different from what the finished product was there’s a theory AI was used for part of the process to get it done faster. And it flopped, hard. People want things that have passion and humanity to them. People can tell.

[@Superkangaroox]

​@@TheManinBlack9054I care more about the creation than the end product. My favorite content to 'consume' is practically How It's Made stuff

[@RLennoxx]

It isn't about lowering the barrier to entry, or progressing technology - artists and writers (and filmmakers) wouldn't/shouldn't be upset by that. As you said, it's how progression has always been. HOWEVER, what a lot of creatives are upset by is that it's taking all of our data, all of our human creation and then it is being used to "create" things from our work. Our hard work. Our blood, sweat and tears. Then it is being used to undercut us. It is not about halting progression, it is about us being screwed over.

[@phoneywheeze]

Sure, that sucks. But you have to understand that IP Rights are as real in the physical world as Santa Claus. Maybe you can get your government to impose those rights, but what about the Chinese government? or similar other countries? You will never be able to have all countries respect each others ip rights.

[@1Yooter]

"I have transcended beyond the concern of a single universe, no scammer is safe from me." - Voidzilla, moments after acquiring all of the infinity gems

[@TehAwareness]

The void is awesome. Enjoying having almost daily coffee uploads.

[@astralshore]

As usual, I’m less worried about the technology than I am about the people using it. Yes, it’ll lower the barrier of entry for new creators and in that sense, it’s just another tool with which actually talented people will excel. But I think the negative impact of scams, fake news etc will be far, far greater than any positive effect.

[@astralshore]

@@matthewhiatt3862 I guess you’re right, that may have sounded too dismissive. I think what I meant to convey is that it’s like the discovery of nuclear fission. Revolutionary, but in the end it’s up to people to decide how to use it (and, knowing people, that scares me more than the tech itself).

[@bluester7177]

​​@@astralshoreit's not actually up to people though, we live under capitalism and these tools are being developed under that, so the purpose is pretty much set in profit. I think we are doomed, I'm already dreading my next presidential election with fake audios generated by AI, we will probably have a civil war in my country soon.

[@AliceAWilson]

TBH, its a tool in the same way aimbot is. In that you can take someone with not even an ounce of talent, who doesn't understand the most simple linework and then have them blow the competition away asif they had years of experience. If there was "cheating" in art then this would certainly be it.

[@pingpong1727]

@@astralshore Sure but nuclear fission is much more difficult to use maliciously for the average person, this technology has a much lower barrier of entry.

[@bewawolf19]

@@matthewhiatt3862 It is just another tool. I can find you quotes of the same fearmongering being made about digital art and photoshop when those tools came out. It's just the same people who thought technology could never replace them being horrified and bombastic at technology replacing them, and then everyone overreacting too it. It is going to have a net positive effect on society, the barrier to create creative projects is going to be lowered, and people who are actually skilled in their craft will retain their job in niche positions whilst those who produced mediocre content en-masse will be easily replaced. Just like how you can still find hand-made high quality shoes for a premium.

[@TheMacs1]

Again I actually think I am liking this channel even better Coffee!

[@DinDeen]

Hey, Southeast Asian here. Answering your question if this is as far as AI goes: no, it's going to continue because there is demand. If you look up "UNESCO generative AI", that's one insight into where this is heading. Aside from research, it's also being implemented in the academe with little to no safeguards. Meaning, teachers and students alike are being encouraged to use AI not just as an assistant but as a creator with little to no regard or repercussions for copyright infringement and other ethical/moral concerns. Those of us who are on the more creative side of education such as writing, animation and game development are doing what we can to implement our own versions of it while emphasizing that AI should be used as a complement to the human creator's skill. But it's an uphill battle, we are -literally- required to use AI tools in our syllabus now.

[@Dogo.R]

The solution is to not get "education" via the school system.

[@TreeLBollingTreeMan]

Thanks for the heads up on UNESCO.

[@somechinesedude5466]

​considering it came from country that fight tooth & nails for copyrights, its a good sign Just create anything as you wish & make profit if it possible Let the market decide what thrive or die

[@nmgg6928]

Glad to hear some of you trying to emphasize it as a tool not a replacement. I worry about here in america those in power are so determined to be drastically one side or the other instead of understanding what nuance is and taking time to fully understand anything

[@packrat-y7j]

That's so dangerous. I experiment with AI quite a bit. I'll use a geek as an example: because I know what works with code and what doesn't, I can see the flaws, and fix them. Having someone who can't do this, operate it, will produce inferior and/or non working code. The cool thing, is if you're someone like me, is that it can be a force multiplier. I know enough of what and how a computer can do things, but not always the specifics of other languages. I can switch from Ruby to Python to Rust and C so much faster now. In the end, could Coffee donut? Maybe. I'd bet it would have a lot of problems if he tried though.

[@seekittycat]

The thought of animating something then pretending it's a prompt is hilarious

[@jetfirexx]

It all rests on where the lawyers and regulators end up. So far, OpenAI have blatantly ignored copyright law and have told governments they need to be allowed to continue to do so for the technology to develop. Its not a coincidence that they've not touched AI music generation beyond what Amazon did a few years ago because both the case law and the companies are incredibly against them. I'm also always sceptical of crafted previews like this vs how the tool works when nornal people try to generate content with it but even if these are the best the model can do and other prompts are significantly worse, this is still incredibly impressive

[@walkingonneedles]

openai is that mad scientist who pushes through to achieve his goal when the rest of the town has long since been sick of him

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

They have touched music actually. It's not as fast developing as the visual side of things but there some pretty terrifying demos from openai

[@phoneywheeze]

its pandoras box. You shut down openai there are 3 more companies just like it. 10 more will pop up. You have to realize, everything that can be represented in a digital world is limited. It's just a matter of computing power to cover the surface area more.

[@shinyskitty3671]

This! AI does have the potential to do good, but while it’s being created unethically like this even the “good” it does is tainted!! And the music industry just proves how unfair it is to digital artists and writers. We don’t have the protection that music does and it shows… nasty stuff.

[@BehindCriminalMinds]

I believe Sora is absolutely incredible and I genuinely cannot wait for it. I am a creator who routinely has to use stock footage for my videos. The ability to write a prompt and create my own scenes without the prohibitively expensive cost of buying stock footage is an immense leap forward. Technological advancements have always caused major shifts in our society. For example the invention of cars, planes, radios, televisions and cell phones just to name a few. The people who were once phone operators, morse code operators, horse and buggy operators, and pay phone owners all had their careers made obsolete by those new technologies. But the claims that it will replace us is short sighted in my opinion. AI may be able to replicate human creativity in many ways, but it lacks the inspiration, and for a lack of a better term, it lacks the soul behind what we create. AI is not a threat to your channel, because no matter how well it mimic’s you, it isn’t you and no amount of innovation will ever replace who we are as creators. But that’s just my 2 cents.

[@KelliConan]

My issue with the A.I. thing is that it’s not gonna let there still be jobs for most people. This is good for companies that own a certain A.I. There will start with a handful of techs to keep the A.I. working and to upgrade it. Then selling the rights for other companies to use it will not be a thing at some point ‘cause the owner of that A.I. can just have the A.I. make everything that the companies that were leasing the A.I. were doing. So more jobs gone. So people need to come up with new tech and be able to save money ‘cause the technicians working on the A.I. programs are getting paid. Big companies (at least in the US) wanna make as money as they can. So that’ll be when the A.I. needs to be made to everything without a technician. More jobs are gone and almost no one has a job. So pretty much, with the A.I. stuff that most ultimately want to end up having, it’s gonna be worse than the movies I Robot and Minority report. A.I. is gonna take almost everyone’s job and if you aren’t living the rest of your life on government assisntace/SSI, then how are people supposed to make money anymore if there are almost no possible jobs left? That’s the end game issue with most of the A.I. stuff. It’s to save money, which slowly cuts out the majority of jobs there can be. That’s my main issue with what A.I. is going towards.

[@Hebdomad7]

I don't think it'll last five years before the A.I starts maintaining itself and training itself with no human intervention. It will just ingest the usage metrics from it's users and adapt on the fly from there. I don't see how we go back from here. Unless we outright ban it right now, which no boomer politician is going to do when they barely understands how their desktop computer works and still insists on doing all their admin via paper. We are stuck between a generation who owns everything and yet knows little of todays problems... and a generation so entrenched into technology, they barely have social skills beyond the emotes they learned in Fortnite who are destined to be even more broke than we are....

[@WoodrowThe3rd]

Once we know, for sure, that anything or anyone can be faked online so well that there is no way to know if it's real or not, how can that possibly be good for humanity? We might as well be back in the days prior to electronic communication, since no information is better than bad information. I can't see how this doesn't push humanity towards a more dystopian future.

[@phoneywheeze]

it is already possible. Cgi, animation, edits, vfx already exists. Anything that can be faked using this would also be possible to get faked without this. It just automates the process

[@dzintars8034]

@@phoneywheeze I mean automation is part of the problem, people who want to stir up trouble had to have actual skills and put in effort to create the 'bad' thing, but now literally anyone will be able to do this at a really high quality making it nearly impossible to distinguish unless you're like an expert.

[@phoneywheeze]

@@dzintars8034 so only experts should be able to make fake evidence? that doesn't make sense. It's justifying fake evidence because someone had to put work to create it

[@marcuskirk1284]

My wife and I are cg artists working in TV and film on many big shows. Have been out of work since July because of the strikes and now the progression of ai is putting our livelyhood in jepordy faster than we could have ever imagined... It's making real skills look more appealing. Scary times.

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

​​​@@FlipFinderzOkay buddy you're sounding like an anarcho capitalist. I can't imagine bootlicking companies this hard

[@marcuskirk1284]

@FlipFinderz you ok mentally bro? Vfx people didn't strike, writers and actors did.

[@TheMidnightBlue_369]

14:34 "Not the life saving kind" LOL. Thank goodness.

[@MrRADicalOfficial]

Haven't watched and don't even want to because AI scares me too. It's so depressing. It is going to make Coffee's job so much harder..

[@Lucius4992]

I'm a coder and I know that AI has been used to generate code for a while. But for some reason what gives me more pain is what happened to digital artists. Every site where they share their hard work, it is now flooded by AI art. And what scares me right now is exactly what you said about the future. So far there have been ways of eventually determining if something was generated by AI or not, but that might change soon. I have had people literally saying to me "no dude, AI is not that capable, that's fearmongering". Lol.

[@murrethmedia]

I'm always polite when I talk to ChatGPT... Just in case.

[@janewaysmom]

One time I accidentally thanked Google Assistant. It got confused, and that lead to my trying to explain to it, and it was a whole mess. I think we can just be direct without taking the extra effort to use manners lol.

[@luiza_asyamova]

this is so funny, I had the same exact thought 😅

[@okashiad6930]

All I hear is Maxwell in suspenders in my future and I’m here for it.

[@lucky464steel]

you look into the void for long enough the void looks back at you

[@Agiranto]

You look into void kong enough and it generates a video of Will Smith eating spaghetti

[@seananon4893]

No, it generates a video of the King of England having sex with an infant Will Smith on a spaghetti plate.@@Agiranto

[@daysandwords]

That's exactly it. People saying "We've dealt with this before." don't really know what "this" is. It really is different thing time.

[@alvinedwaldchan3071]

Scary how fast this can escalate and destroy comms channels due to trust issues in the future 😢

[@NicoleDweezy]

You could now use AI to pretend to be an old boss or coworker and give you recommendations 😂

[@shbmsrto]

It's 2060, real and fake are indistinguishable, everything is a subscription, being off social media is the new trend, and your Ai clone just got hacked.

[@TheManinBlack9054]

What makes you think there will be a 2060?

[@___________0Z0X]

ICLONE JUTSU!!!

[@dzintars8034]

more like 2025

[@sutats]

_Upon its creation, Skynet began to learn at a geometric rate._

[@jbobbeals5521]

This latenight voideo was fuckin needed🙏🏽

[@pramay_21]

voideo, nice🫡

[@TheTeeProd]

@@pramay_21 its heavy on the tongue. we need more of a subtle one. maybe remove the first "o" from voideo

[@cedrove7513]

i cant believe you didnt finish the bollywood movie clip. you left us hanging on the final act of the story

[@timewalker6654]

The progress is not gonna stop, but we definitely need regulations and laws that stop these AI companies from stealing people's work to train their models

[@drewo.127]

This comment has more truth in it than saying the sky is blue!

[@acool1356]

I was expecting this entire video to be ai generated

[@OnePlanetOneTribe]

What really scares me about the AI videos is when you see a bunch of people dancing together and smiling but, they were never there. There wasn't a party. They never met each other, never had their hair cut that way by a stylist, the clothes weren't designed by anyone but they're all having a wonderful time.. but they never had a wonderful time!! They never had a name, never had to try and get the lighting just right for the shot or anything!

[@kiii9403]

Excellent point. You can't have an emotional connection to non existing puppies or non existing characters in a movie. Watching this, knowing it's made by AI is different than not knowing

[@voultronix761]

Let's hope the soulless feeling is reason why ai videos don't perform well as real ones but I highly doubt it 😢

[@voultronix761]

@FlipFinderz yeah but you can feel the emotions when the acting is good. If you have autism I understand why - not saying that as an insult .

[@TheManinBlack9054]

​@@voultronix761i think he just trying to be real.

[@OnePlanetOneTribe]

Thats a good point@@FlipFinderz

[@MelonInDisguise]

Day 7: I think the void is talking to me, it’s like an alluring lullaby.

[@janewaysmom]

Yeah ok this is actually scary and I agree with you especially on the prospect of ai growing and changing.

[@TheInternetHelpdeskPlays]

There's a great streamer called Pirate Software. A few days ago he was talking about the dangers of AI and he's made his bank not do any transactions unless he's there in person, no emails, no voice calls, no video, only in person! This guy who worked in gaming and security his whole working life wont let his bank do anything without him in person! It's only going to get worse from here.

[@therealf.b.i9468]

I'm really scared and I hope open ai don't release it to the public

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

They will or they'll release it to corporations exclusively. Either way is bad. Too much profit is involved

[@leefinthewind2311]

How do we know voidzilla isn't an AI competing with coffee

[@ColombianLNP]

My personal opinion looking at two angles. First angle, this is scary yet impressive. The fact that its advancing at this pace goes to show how quickly everything is progressing and yes while it may mean less artistic expression in a sense and more churning of content. It still will be used along side human intervention which is not necessarily bad in the semse that things will be produced much faster and maybe at lower cost just throwing things out there. Second angle this and other Ai / automated stuff can and hopefully will cause us to resort back to more human and face to face interactions. Yeah you can fake an ai video but you vant fake a real life person (well at least not yet lol) this will cause another sector to grow once again which is the human to human interaction. I have a lot more to say, but yeah im not going to bore you coffee Zilla and others with a super long post but man seeing bothe sides of this really is fascinating. Wish I could go on someone's podcast to discuss this topic but Anywho cheers amigo from your biggest fan in Colombia! Edit: I apologize for my grammar English is my second language. And two y'all follow s channel called "Life's adventures" that kid is doing a penny series and it's impressive. Something that I doubt ai would be able to do for a while lol but I may be wrong lol but yeah follow him he's cool that's all :)

[@NelemNaru]

Good points

[@drewo.127]

Mind if I use this for research for my short film about human art vs. soulless content and how AI fits in both?

[@ColombianLNP]

@@drewo.127 ooohhh I like that! Go right ahead amigo! If you want a discussion reach out. I'd love to express my thoughts on this!

[@MrPaisleyPrince]

I know of a animation company. This might significantly reduce the headcount or even worse the business entirely. Clients will likely be able to generate animations themselves and no longer require the services of professionals.

[@daemonbyte]

You mean like dreamweaver, sorry angelfire, sorry wordpress, oppsie I meant wix oh no it was chatgpt has wiped out web developers?

[@SubhojitDey]

Couldve named this channel even more coffee

[@intraspec]

Better keep an eye on Maxwell, he might replace you Coffee

[@Jules-916]

Plot twist: Bollywood has been using AI this whole time

[@kissingfrogs]

I just hope they dont replace Maxwell. An AI impersonating a CGI scares me, Assuming he is CGI, I never could tell. Plot twist - This coffeezilla was coffeezilla ai

[@templarknight7]

even if AI can take down scammers in the future, there will be AI doing scams. You can just become a commentator on these AI scam wars in the future.

[@NelemNaru]

Then he'd have to compete with AI commentators

[@user-uj4dd1te5g]

"How long will I be in the Void?" Is exactly the question someone in the Void asks themselves everyday forever.

[@reid3031]

Ya know, becoming an Offline Man sounds more and more appealing

[@danniel-1]

One of my favorite KZbin channels is AI Written Horror Stories. Feel like that’s the only thing we should use ai for.

[@Will-kt5jk]

14:57 JBP & JRE being so credulous & getting “fooled by the internet” is simultaneously one of my favourite things and scary, given how influential they both are. “Why would it lie” - indeed Joe. Why would it lie?

[@byrnemeister2008]

But it does explain a lot about the state of the world today. It’s literally the blind leading the blind down some dark and dangerous roads. Amplifying every conspiracy theory and crackpot idea possible and packing for mass market consumption.

[@bluester7177]

Also, at least in my experience, they are similar to the older people I know but more online, so if they are getting fooled so is every other elderly person.

[@scottbeldi5826]

The dummyzilla should have reached down at the end and grabbed your shoulder 😂!! Showmanship will be the difference!

[@molybdomancer195]

I think the thing which could limit the use of AI could be copyright law. If that photo taken by a monkey wasn’t protected by copyright because no human was directly involved in its creation, I think the same thing will apply to AI generated art.

[@Fenriswaffle]

Unfortunately its a weak limit. There are ways to copyright parts, IP, or the whole, or other aspects of the product without being a copyright on the content itself. Additionally, it has not stopped companies from issuing entirely baseless garbage DMCA takedowns (or worse, content-ID on YT) on creators who may not have the resources to properly fight it. The deck is so stacked in their favor.

[@bewawolf19]

You similarly will be facing the issue is consumers don't care about the creator but only the quality. You artificially ban any American company from using AI to protect the weeping artists, countries that don't ban it will outproduce same quality product at a massively cheaper device. It is the combine of progress now finally chewing up the digital painters just as it chewed up the other artisans centuries ago. Randomly trying to ban it is just a pointless Luddite reaction that doesn't even save the jobs made redundant from the tech. We just need to adapt to the new future.

[@CodyMcGriff]

bro the end haha, the real fans, pretty sure I have watched every minute of your YT life. Thanks for these little tid bits like the ending, god bless the Zilla of coffee and the void.

[@JaspisB]

I honestly try not to think too much much about the societal implications of AI, since it fills me with bottomless dread.

[@anotheran]

And I was thinking you started using AI to find scammers x100 faster

[@MrGrinderman]

I'm a graphic designer, and have been at the top of my field (within my industry & country) for over a decade. I left my job and went freelance nearly 2 years ago. The second MJ came out I saw the potential. Meanwhile my old colleagues IT dept's weren't allowed to give in-house staff access. I've built a career designing original commercial art professionally, but now as a freelancer, time is literally money. The faster I can get the job done, the sooner I can start the next job. I can tell you 100% that in 50-75% of my jobs now, AI is infinitely faster, but not the way most folks might think. It takes me 4 hours av of prompting to get MJ to give me something I can take in to p'shop to work with, and it's hi res from the get go (especially now with aftermarket upscalers). Versus a day, or 2 (or 3) scouring libraries for images which in most cases will be low res and watermarked for concepts. And once I have the approved concept, I have burn even more time to go back and re-do the pice all over again in hi res. Then the idea that people without the skills or talent are going to use AI to displace real creatives...use it to do what? Most creatives with long standing reputations have a hard enough time getting enough work to keep the lights on! I can promise you that dickheads with MJ or Dall-e have no hope of stepping in to an industry they have no history in and making a single dollar. To say nothing of the fact that there's not a single AI image I haven't had to manipulate in p'shop to get it where I need it to be, and AI can't do typography much less live, editable type. I'm sure it will get there, but it aint there yet and that's a big deal. So are we all fucked? Probably. But we're kind of in the goldilocks zone right now where many creatives, especially commercial ones, are using AI as another resource for their work, especially given the watermarked, low res walled gardens offered by Getty etc. Their creative skills and talent, even if it's just the skill or vision to know what they're looking for and recognise it when they see it, is 100% required...and most importantly, their ability to get the actual work in the first place. Where's it all going? You could make a thousand guesses and still likely be wrong, buy a mile. But again, are we all fucked? Eventually, of course.

[@macieparmenter4544]

When all this first came out I saw a post that really spoke to me. It was something along the lines of "I think it's interesting that AI is targeting creative works, something that we have long considered a part of what makes us human, and not the jobs society hates to do" and that got me thinking that AI isn't really about improving society, it's about ego and capitalism. I don't want a robot to write poetry for me, I want a robot to take my fast food order so the worker it replaces can make a living writing poetry. I know that would take so much societal change and might be impossible but I just get frustrated when I see people balk at the challenge and move in the opposite direction. "We don't know what the future holds" like you've forgotten that you have a part in making the future happen. Thank you for coming to my TED talk. Please be nice to each other in the comments.

[@OneOut1]

If a person was alreasy capable if making a kiving writing poetry why would they be making fast food in the first place.

[@foxbruner]

Artist here. We tried to warn you guys. Here's the most important thing to keep in mind: You can own a tablet. You can own a camera. You can't own an AI content generation algorithm. Only a giant multibillion dollar corporation can, and you're leasing it from them. If you have to rent the tool you need, the person who owns the tool controls you. Their terms will change, their prices will change, their decisions of what they deem acceptable to create using their tools will change, and you will be bound by those whims at every turn. Don't let your voice be owned by a corporation.

[@eekos]

KZbin interrupting this video to show me an ad from someone offering an AI to generate rubbish ebooks is just hilarious

[@bcwebster747]

PRAISE THE VOID

[@hallowedknight4267]

I’m honestly excited for this technology to come out, I’m in the process of starting up a business and this will help MASSIVELY with advertising

[@ri3m4nn]

Im an AI director at a company that powers chatgpt, MSFT and Twitter AI... being scared is the right attitude.... let me make this clear... this is the moment that every child born from here on will take artificial intelligence for granted just as children born 10 years ago now take the internet for granted.

[@TheManinBlack9054]

If there are children left... You know that every second AI researcher thinks there is at least 10% chance of AI causing human extinction. Think about it. This is what you're powering (provided you're being honest).

[@worcestershire1080]

YOU SHOULD REPLACE YOUR JOB WITH THE AI FIRST

[@ri3m4nn]

@worcestershire1080 we actually use internal AI "executive assistants." If you have 50K, we can make a digital twin of you, that can answer like you but for content related to your company. No worries, intellectual replacement is coming for all of us. Relationship value is key.

[@gavin_guidry]

As an artist, I'm hoping the lack of copyright slows things down, in terms of media creation, but it's definitely going to be an issue for scams. The biggest disappointment for me is how fans of it speak about the craftspeople it negatively effects.

[@phoneywheeze]

Even if you think it should be copyrighted, there are already open-source models which you cannot change. Everything was already possible without AI. Editing has already existed. I respect artists but the disrespect comes from artists being against the technology. Tech people built the digital world, built the grid which represents an image, built how the image should be shown, built tools to edit the image. This is the logical next step, building the tools that fill the pixels in the grid.

[@8brm]

I hate AI. Things are going way too haywire, soon enough nobody in the art space or videography space will have jobs, not to mention from what I know no country has implemented AI laws or regulations meaning it’s not far fetched to believe you’ll get away with something crazy like AI faking a celebrities affair. All and all it could be a great endeavor but honestly we’re not ready as a whole, too many distractions for our trusted officials to keep up and be up to date with these AI systems. As it stands the US is not amused, nor are they batting an eye.

[@movestattoo4561]

While I mostly agree with you, AI will never replace the whole art space. I can guarantee you that people who buy original representational art will never buy anything that AI makes. Because in that space the art and the painter are almost equally important part of the purchase.

[@TheManinBlack9054]

​@@movestattoo4561you should separate art from the artist. That's how it supposed to work, unless you talking about snobs, but then it's a different game entirely.

[@movestattoo4561]

@@TheManinBlack9054 why should anyone do that? There’s nothing snobbish about wanting to buy paintings from a certain artist that you build a relationship with. And AI has nothing to do with art.

[@ripmad]

The star trek holodeck is coming sooner than we thought

[@JosephFuller]

One thing I'm not hearing people talking about is the energy cost. Every time a new prompt is written; *LOTS* of energy is used to generate an image, a text, or a video. One good side of the video AI gen is for stunt work, it could help save lives (or at the least injuries).

[@bluester7177]

I don't think it will, the people who do stunts are still going to do dangerous stunts as a hobby, they found a way to monetise what they like, most of them are not there just because they found themselves in that job and hate it.

[@biigsmokee]

Training takes way more energy than generation

[@coryc9040]

@@biigsmokee maybe, but it only needs to be done once. Video generation has got to be computationally expensive. I know that image generation already is relatively computationally expensive.

[@komocode]

for decades we've had tech that can generate cgi of rube goldberg machines, but we still watch the real ones for whatever reason

[@alexrichard2447]

Also, for people nitpicking on details that are not shockingly wrong: humans can mess up CGI as well, especially when on a deadline, just saying...

[@dmoonmaster1653]

Would a new career path appear? Kind of like being a DJ. 'This guy is so good and nuanced with his prompt input.' 'He makes that ai sing to his tune.' Someone who is good at 'translating human into Ai.' It's like being good at googling: 'he always gets just the right output in the most efficient way.' An Ai whisperer.