Cohen v. California Summary | quimbee.com

A video case brief of Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971). Read the full-text brief at www.quimbee.com/cases/cohen-v...
The Los Angeles Municipal Court convicted Robert Cohen (defendant) for violating the state penal code prohibiting “maliciously and willfully disturbing the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or person by offensive conduct.” He was convicted after wearing a jacket bearing the words “Fuck the Draft.” Women and children were present. Cohen argued that he wore the jacket as a means of expressing the depth of his feelings toward the Vietnam War and the draft. He did not engage in any threatening conduct in conjunction with this speech. Cohen challenged his conviction on First Amendment grounds against the State of California (plaintiff), but the California Court of Appeal upheld the conviction. The Supreme Court of California denied review, but the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

[@mactastic144]

"The free exchange of ideas, even offensively expressed ideas, is a *virtue* worthy of First Amendment protection." - Justice Harlan These words are a blessing to my ears. People don't realize the importance of this decision.

[@LegalEyesFreedom]

Amen to that.

[@jokeduder]

Preach!

[@HistoryCollectorsForum]

Case law that is still relevant today.

[@mactastic144]

Did you hear about Dillon Shane Webb?

[@kitamuraken5042]

lll)lllll

[@kitamuraken5042]

ｂｂｂｈｈｈ9

[@kitamuraken5042]

.

[@charlesallen4984]

EXACTLY being under police monitoring and being targeted personally for getting someone butt hurt. They’re messing with someone’s life and livelihood. All I wanted was to be left alone and that was my message. Don’t mess with me. They could have easily left me alone as soon as I got my own weapon to protect myself from the person breaking into my room.

[@Toshineko]

Just like the ''Eff the draft'' t shirt is protected speech, so too is the ''Eff the police'' t shirt. Isn't that right, officers?

[@TheJosherrs]

Lovely video

[@Cjephunneh]

As long as tyrants exist, Free speech limits will continue to be controversial.

[@Rihardololz]

UK and Australia.

[@philipcearley1992]

It's a freedom of speech, but keep it low in front of the children.

[@isaacrios8392]

this was on the 2024 ap gov exam lol

[@ItmeFatima]

hahaahahaha!

[@giordanobruno1333]

Try pulling a camera like a GoPro or your cell phone camera in a courthouse, courtroom or even out on the steps and you risk assault from law enforcement. Go ahead. Try to express your free speech in the most public building in your community. Just pull out a camera. Don’t say a word. Just record. Good luck.

[@Cjephunneh]

This is because the judges want to get away with their dirty deeds away from cameras. Especially in family courts

[@billywayne6104]

fuck judges

[@MrPapageorgio]

Example Westboro Baptist Church